CHAPTER 5: REFERENCESAlaska Department of Commerce, Community, <strong>and</strong> Economic Development. 2004. Alaska EconomicInformation System website. Date visited: November 11, 2004.http://www.commerce.state.ak.us/dca/AEIS/AEIS_Home.htmAlaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). 1996. Water Quality Assessment Report.Division of Air <strong>and</strong> Water Quality: Juneau, Alaska.Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). 2002. Website. Date visited: February 8,2005. .http://www.state.ak.us/dec/water/wqsar/waterbody/cat5-303(d)list.pdfAlaska Department of Fish <strong>and</strong> Game (ADFG). 1998. State of Alaska Species of Special Concern.http://www.wildlife.alaska.gov/aawildlife/endangered/es_ssc.cfmAlaska Department of Fish <strong>and</strong> Game (ADFG). 2001. Proportion of Military Fishing <strong>and</strong> Hunting to TotalLicensees. Alaska Fish <strong>and</strong> Game 2001 License File (CD-ROM): Juneau, Alaska.Alaska Department of Fish <strong>and</strong> Game (ADFG). 2002. Statewide Stocking Plan for Recreational Fisheries,2002. Sport Fish Division: Anchorage, Alaska.Alaska Department of Labor <strong>and</strong> Workforce Development. 2004. Workforce Info website. Date visited:November 12, 2004. http://almis.labor.state.ak.us/Alaska Fire Service <strong>and</strong> State of Alaska. 1998. Cooperative Fire Protection Agreement between U. S.Department of the Interior, Bureau of L<strong>and</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, Alaska Fire Service <strong>and</strong> State ofAlaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry.Alaska Natural Heritage Program. 2005. Alaska Biodiversity webpage. Date Visited: February 22, 2005.http://aknhp.uaa.alaskaedu/Alaska Wildl<strong>and</strong> Fire Coordinating Group. 1998. Alaska Interagency Wildl<strong>and</strong> Fire <strong>Management</strong> Plan.www.dnr.state.ak.us/foreestry/pdfs/98AIFMP.pdf Date visited: February 16, 2005.Anderson, G.S. 1970. Hydrologic Reconnaissance of the Tanana Basin, Central Alaska. Map fromHydrologic Investigations Atlas. HA-319 (sheet 2 of 4).Anderson, B.A., R.J. Ritchie, B.E. Lawhead, J.R. Rose, A.M. Wildman, S.F. Schlenter. 2000. "WildlifeStudies at Fort Wainwright <strong>and</strong> Fort Greely, Central Alaska, 1998." <strong>Final</strong> Report, U.S. ArmyCold Regions Research <strong>and</strong> Engineering Laboratory <strong>and</strong> U.S. Army Alaska: Fairbanks, Alaska.Andres, B.A., A.J. Sorenson, <strong>and</strong> B.T. Browne. 2001. Inventory <strong>and</strong> Monitoring of Neotropical MigratoryL<strong>and</strong>birds on Fort Richardson, Alaska.Bailey, R.G. 1995. Description of the Ecoregions of the United States. Second Edition. MiscellaneousPublication Number 1391. USDA Forest Service: Washington, D.C.Benson, C.S. 1970. Ice Fog: Low Temperature Air Pollution. Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army. ColdRegions Research <strong>and</strong> Engineering Laboratory: Hanover, New Hampshire._____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 73
Benson, A.M. 1999. Distribution of L<strong>and</strong>birds among Habitats on the Tanana Flats <strong>and</strong> Yukon Maneuver<strong>Area</strong>, Fort Wainwright, Alaska 1998. Alaska Bird Observatory: Fairbanks, Alaska.Boreal Partners in Flight Working Group. 1999. L<strong>and</strong>bird Conservation Plan for Alaska BiogeographicRegions. Version 1.0. U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service: Anchorage, Alaska.Bristol Environmental <strong>and</strong> Engineering Service. 2003. Draft Sampling Report Range CharacterizationJarvis Creek, Fort Greely, Alaska. Contract Report to U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska.Bureau of L<strong>and</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (BLM) <strong>and</strong> U.S. Army. 1994. Fort Wainwright Yukon Maneuver <strong>Area</strong>Proposed Resource <strong>Management</strong> Plan <strong>Final</strong> Environmental Impact Statement.CH2M Hill. 1994. Comprehensive Evaluation Report, Eagle River Flats, Fort Richardson, Alaska.Prepared for Department of Public Works, Fort Richardson Alaska. 193p.Cold Regions Research <strong>and</strong> Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). 2004. Website. Date visited: February 8,2005. .http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/erf/currentactivities/Denfeld, D.C. 1988. Nike Hercules in Alaska. Anchorage, Alaska: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, AlaskaDistrict.Denfeld, D.C. 1994. The Cold War in Alaska: A <strong>Management</strong> Plan for Cultural Resources, 1994-1999.Anchorage, Alaska: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District.Department of the Army. 2002. Army Wildl<strong>and</strong> Fire Policy Guidance. Assistant Chief of Staff forInstallation <strong>Management</strong>. Washington, D.C.: August, 2002.Department of Defense, Directorate for Information Operations <strong>and</strong> Reports. 2004. Atlas/Data Abstractfor the United States <strong>and</strong> Selected <strong>Area</strong>s, Fiscal Year 2003. Date visited: November 11, 2004.http://web1.whs.osd.mil.mmid/L03/fy03/03top.htmEngebretson, Sara L. 2005. Gravel Material Site Inventory, Yukon <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>, Fort WainwrightAlaska. Salcha-Delta Soil <strong>and</strong> Water Conservation District: Delta Junction, Alaska.Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise (FICUN). 1980. Guidelines for Considering Noise inL<strong>and</strong> Use Planning <strong>and</strong> Control. Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise.Ford, J. <strong>and</strong> B.L. Bedford. 1987. The Hydrology of Alaskan Wetl<strong>and</strong>s, U.S.A.: A Review. Arctic <strong>and</strong>Alpine Research 19:209-229.Gossweiler, W.A. 1984. Fort Richardson Natural Resources <strong>Management</strong> Plan. Natural ResourcesBranch: Fort Richardson, Alaska.Higgs, A.S., B.A. Potter, P.M. Bowers, <strong>and</strong> O.K. Mason. 1999. Cultural Resources Survey Report of theYukon <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>and</strong> Fort Greely Army L<strong>and</strong>s Withdrawal, Alaska. Northern L<strong>and</strong> UseResearch, Inc.: Fairbanks, Alaska.Hultén, E. 1968. Flora of Alaska <strong>and</strong> Neighboring Territories. A Manual of the Vascular Plants. StanfordUniversity Press: Stanford, California._____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 74
- Page 1:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUNITED STATES
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1: PURPOSE
- Page 7 and 8:
Table 3.9 Summary of Impacts to Hum
- Page 9 and 10:
and Training Land Program, the rang
- Page 11 and 12:
• Establish a defined land condit
- Page 13:
Donnelly Training AreaDonnelly Trai
- Page 17 and 18:
determine whether additional NEPA a
- Page 19 and 20:
Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental
- Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFEC
- Page 23 and 24:
Maneuver Trail Maintenance and Upgr
- Page 25 and 26:
Mungoven 2001). Engineering soil ty
- Page 27 and 28:
projects and would result in wide,
- Page 29 and 30: growth. Wind and sand fences would
- Page 31 and 32: iological impacts of military train
- Page 33 and 34: willow scrub communities are common
- Page 35 and 36: disturbed. Further, hardening low w
- Page 37 and 38: disturbance or removal, best manage
- Page 39 and 40: SRAThrough the SRA program, soldier
- Page 41 and 42: Ship Creek (from the Glenn Highway
- Page 43 and 44: effective site drainage. Required p
- Page 45 and 46: Game 1998). More information on wil
- Page 47 and 48: Fort Wainwright and associated land
- Page 49 and 50: Long-term beneficial impacts to wil
- Page 51 and 52: 1998).The Alaska Interagency Wildla
- Page 53 and 54: Prescribed burns, mechanical thinni
- Page 55 and 56: unplanned fires, soldiers are direc
- Page 57 and 58: USARAK also implemented the USARTRA
- Page 59 and 60: LRAM projects beneficial to public
- Page 61 and 62: Cumulative ImpactsPast military act
- Page 63 and 64: Two surveys conducted on Yukon Trai
- Page 65 and 66: LRAM activities under Alternative 1
- Page 67 and 68: 3.9.1 Affected EnvironmentFort Rich
- Page 69 and 70: SRA program, which educates soldier
- Page 71 and 72: 3.10.2 Environmental ConsequencesAl
- Page 73 and 74: Fort Richardson receives few compla
- Page 75 and 76: Table 3.11 Summary of Impacts 1 to
- Page 77 and 78: oads and hauling fill and rock mate
- Page 79: CHAPTER 4: PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTO
- Page 83 and 84: Neely, R. J. 2001. Early Mining His
- Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER 6: AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS
- Page 87 and 88: Project NameBulldog TrailWidening P
- Page 89 and 90: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Demo
- Page 91 and 92: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Firi
- Page 93 and 94: Project NameEddy Drop ZoneVegetatio
- Page 95 and 96: Project Name33 Mile LoopRoad Shortc
- Page 97 and 98: APPENDIX B: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTIC
- Page 99 and 100: Sediment Trap(Permanent) SeedingSil
- Page 101 and 102: APPENDIX C: SAMPLE RECORD OF ENVIRO
- Page 103 and 104: APPENDIX D: ITAM PROJECT ASSESSMENT
- Page 105 and 106: Fire ManagementYes No□ □ Could
- Page 107 and 108: APPENDIX E: AGENCY COMMENTSThe foll
- Page 109 and 110: ___________________________________
- Page 111 and 112: ___________________________________
- Page 113 and 114: Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:00 PM
- Page 115 and 116: Second paragraph - I do not underst
- Page 117 and 118: sentence could read, "The trees are
- Page 119 and 120: The third paragraph seems too speci
- Page 121: USARAK does not have a current five