Integrated Training Area Management EA and Final FNSI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cumulative ImpactsAll past, current, and planned construction projects and training activities have local air quality impacts.These impacts consist of dust generated from ground and vegetation disturbance due to construction andtraining, increased use of unimproved roads for Stryker training, and use of motorized constructionequipment. Emissions generated by construction equipment would be temporary and insignificant. Theproposed action would mitigate dust generation through use of dust control best management practicesduring construction activities. Therefore, the overall impact of the proposed action to cumulative airquality at all locations would be minor._____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, Integrated Training Area Management ProgramManagement Plan 71
CHAPTER 4: PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORSCarrie Barta, USAGAK NEPA Coordinator, USAGAK, CEMML, Fort Wainwright.EA Contribution: Agency Consultation, Document Review.Brandon Berta, ITAM Coordinator, USAGAK, CEMML, Fort Richardson.EA Contribution: ITAM Management Plan Preparation, Document ReviewAmanda Brashear, NEPA Analyst, CEMML, Colorado State University.EA Contribution: Document PreparationEllen Clark, ITAM Coordinator, USAGAK, CEMML, Donnelly Training Area.EA Contribution: ITAM Management Plan Preparation, Document Review.Jeff Durham, Program Administrator, Salcha-Delta Soil and Water Conservation District.EA Contribution: ITAM Management Plan Preparation, Document Review.Gary Larsen, Conservation Chief and ITAM Coordinator, USAGAK, CEMML, Fort Richardson.EA Contribution: ITAM Management Plan Preparation, Document Review.Glenda Lesondak, Technical Editor, CEMML, Colorado State University.EA Contribution: Editing.Kellie Peirce, RTLA Coordinator, USARAK, CEMML, Fort Richardson.EA Contribution: ITAM Management Plan Preparation, Document Review.Julie Raymond-Yakoubain, Archaeologist, USAGAK, CEMML, Fort Wainwright.EA Contribution: Cultural Resources Editing and Review.Jessica Resnik, NEPA Analyst, CEMML, Colorado State University.EA Contribution: Document Preparation.Rees, Dan, Forester, USARAK, CEMML, Fort Wainwright.EA Contribution: Fire Management Editing and Review.Russ Sackett, Cultural Resource Manager, USAGAK CEMML, Fort Richardson.EA Contribution: Cultural Resources Editing and Review.Roger Sayre, Fort Wainwright NEPA Coordinator, USAGAK, CEMML, Fort Wainwright.EA Contribution: Agency Consultation, Document Review._____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, Integrated Training Area Management ProgramManagement Plan 72
Page 1:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUNITED STATES
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1: PURPOSE
Page 7 and 8:
Table 3.9 Summary of Impacts to Hum
Page 9 and 10:
and Training Land Program, the rang
Page 11 and 12:
• Establish a defined land condit
Page 13:
Donnelly Training AreaDonnelly Trai
Page 17 and 18:
determine whether additional NEPA a
Page 19 and 20:
Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFEC
Page 23 and 24:
Maneuver Trail Maintenance and Upgr
Page 25 and 26:
Mungoven 2001). Engineering soil ty
Page 27 and 28: projects and would result in wide,
Page 29 and 30: growth. Wind and sand fences would
Page 31 and 32: iological impacts of military train
Page 33 and 34: willow scrub communities are common
Page 35 and 36: disturbed. Further, hardening low w
Page 37 and 38: disturbance or removal, best manage
Page 39 and 40: SRAThrough the SRA program, soldier
Page 41 and 42: Ship Creek (from the Glenn Highway
Page 43 and 44: effective site drainage. Required p
Page 45 and 46: Game 1998). More information on wil
Page 47 and 48: Fort Wainwright and associated land
Page 49 and 50: Long-term beneficial impacts to wil
Page 51 and 52: 1998).The Alaska Interagency Wildla
Page 53 and 54: Prescribed burns, mechanical thinni
Page 55 and 56: unplanned fires, soldiers are direc
Page 57 and 58: USARAK also implemented the USARTRA
Page 59 and 60: LRAM projects beneficial to public
Page 61 and 62: Cumulative ImpactsPast military act
Page 63 and 64: Two surveys conducted on Yukon Trai
Page 65 and 66: LRAM activities under Alternative 1
Page 67 and 68: 3.9.1 Affected EnvironmentFort Rich
Page 69 and 70: SRA program, which educates soldier
Page 71 and 72: 3.10.2 Environmental ConsequencesAl
Page 73 and 74: Fort Richardson receives few compla
Page 75 and 76: Table 3.11 Summary of Impacts 1 to
Page 77: oads and hauling fill and rock mate
Page 81 and 82: Benson, A.M. 1999. Distribution of
Page 83 and 84: Neely, R. J. 2001. Early Mining His
Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER 6: AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS
Page 87 and 88: Project NameBulldog TrailWidening P
Page 89 and 90: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Demo
Page 91 and 92: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Firi
Page 93 and 94: Project NameEddy Drop ZoneVegetatio
Page 95 and 96: Project Name33 Mile LoopRoad Shortc
Page 97 and 98: APPENDIX B: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTIC
Page 99 and 100: Sediment Trap(Permanent) SeedingSil
Page 101 and 102: APPENDIX C: SAMPLE RECORD OF ENVIRO
Page 103 and 104: APPENDIX D: ITAM PROJECT ASSESSMENT
Page 105 and 106: Fire ManagementYes No□ □ Could
Page 107 and 108: APPENDIX E: AGENCY COMMENTSThe foll
Page 109 and 110: ___________________________________
Page 111 and 112: ___________________________________
Page 113 and 114: Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:00 PM
Page 115 and 116: Second paragraph - I do not underst
Page 117 and 118: sentence could read, "The trees are
Page 119 and 120: The third paragraph seems too speci
Page 121: USARAK does not have a current five
show all

Integrated Training Area Management EA and Final FNSI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?