12.07.2015 Views

Integrated Training Area Management EA and Final FNSI

Integrated Training Area Management EA and Final FNSI

Integrated Training Area Management EA and Final FNSI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Long-term beneficial impacts to wildlife <strong>and</strong> fisheries would result from habitat improvement projectsincluding revegetation projects that prevent erosion, stabilize soils, <strong>and</strong> restore native flora <strong>and</strong> importantforage <strong>and</strong> habitat for wildlife. Streambank stabilization practices, such as willow fascines <strong>and</strong> otherbioengineering techniques, would greatly benefit fisheries habitat as well as provide increased forage <strong>and</strong>habitat for wildlife in riparian areas. Vegetation management practices would improve wildlife habitat byproviding clearings important for edge species <strong>and</strong> by protecting existing vegetation. Estimated acresimpacted from vegetation management activities over the next five years are approximately 20 acres atFort Richardson, 140 acres at Fort Wainwright, <strong>and</strong> 900 acres at Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> (Appendix A).Of the 900 acres impacted at Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>, approximately 570 acres of impact would resultfrom a prescribed burn at Buffalo Drop Zone, a previously cleared area.Installation of barb dikes or thalweg deflectors would have short-term adverse impacts duringconstruction due to downstream siltation. Once installed, they would improve fisheries habitat by creatingincreasing pools in streams. Gabion installation would benefit desired fish species by excluding nondesiredfish from upstream migration (e.g. longnose sucker) <strong>and</strong> preventing them from out-competingdesired fish species (e.g. salmon).RTLAThe RTLA program would include avian, wetl<strong>and</strong>s, vegetation, small mammal, <strong>and</strong> large mammalmonitoring. Aerial monitoring would be conducted at Fort Wainwright <strong>and</strong> Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>and</strong>remote areas of Fort Richardson. Aerial surveys at Fort Wainwright <strong>and</strong> Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> areconducted mainly to monitor trumpeter swan nesting <strong>and</strong> broods <strong>and</strong> bison calving <strong>and</strong> tracking. Theestimated flight time for swan surveys for 2005 is 80 hours (Kellie Peirce, personal communication2005). Minor short-term adverse impacts may result from monitoring conducted by small plane orhelicopter. For more information on noise impacts, see Section 3.11, Noise.Long-term beneficial impacts to wildlife <strong>and</strong> fisheries result form RTLA monitoring. Monitoring datawould be used by Army environmental staff to guide <strong>and</strong> prioritize natural resource managementdecisions. Initial monitoring data would be used as a baseline from which future studies can be compared.Long-term monitoring would provide data to study trends in habitat <strong>and</strong> wildlife <strong>and</strong> fish populations.This data can be used to adaptively manage Army training <strong>and</strong> testing activities.Alternative 2: Implement ITAM Program through a <strong>Management</strong> Plan (Proposed Action)Under this alternative, the ITAM program would be implemented through a management plan that wouldinclude st<strong>and</strong>ard operating procedures for LRAM <strong>and</strong> RTLA projects. Impacts to wildlife <strong>and</strong> fisheries onUSARAK l<strong>and</strong>s due to TRI, LRAM, SRA, RTLA, <strong>and</strong> GIS activities would be similar to those describedunder the No Action Alternative. Implementing st<strong>and</strong>ard operating procedures for the LRAM <strong>and</strong> RTLPprograms would ensure consistent l<strong>and</strong> management <strong>and</strong> monitoring practices. St<strong>and</strong>ardizing procedureswould especially benefit LRAM activities, since adherence to best management practices (Appendix B)would increase efficiency <strong>and</strong> may reduce short-term impacts to wildlife <strong>and</strong> fisheries during projectconstruction.Alternative 3: Suspend ITAM ProgramUnder Alternative 3, all components of the ITAM program would discontinue operation. <strong>Training</strong> l<strong>and</strong>rehabilitation, maintenance, <strong>and</strong> range improvements would cease despite continued use of l<strong>and</strong> for Armytraining. In the absence of LRAM <strong>and</strong> RTLA activities, wildlife would not be disturbed by construction<strong>and</strong> monitoring. However, the benefits of LRAM <strong>and</strong> RTLA for improving <strong>and</strong> monitoring habitat <strong>and</strong>_____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!