<strong>Area</strong>.FisheriesDonnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> West is within the Fairbanks <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Area</strong> for fisheries <strong>and</strong> Donnelly<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> East is within the Delta Junction <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Area</strong>. Sixteen lakes on Donnelly <strong>Training</strong><strong>Area</strong>, ranging from three to 320 acres, are stocked. Naturally occurring populations of lake chub, northernpike, sculpin, <strong>and</strong> the northern longnose sucker are found in lakes at Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> (BLM <strong>and</strong>U.S. Army 1994).Major streams on Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> are generally silt laden <strong>and</strong> do not support fisheries. JarvisCreek <strong>and</strong> the Delta River are glacially fed <strong>and</strong> flow from the north side of the Alaska Range to theTanana River. Downstream of Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>, the Tanana River provides year-round habitat forsome species, overwintering habitat for others, <strong>and</strong> supports migratory species. The mouth of the DeltaRiver is important to chum salmon. Grayling migrate through these glacial streams to clear tributaries tospawn, <strong>and</strong> a few clear streams provide summer habitat for grayling (Parker 2004).3.5.2 Environmental ConsequencesAlternative 1: Continue ITAM Program without a <strong>Management</strong> Plan (No Action)TRI would maintain the environmental limitations inventory to protect sensitive habitats, includingwetl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> riparian areas, from training impacts. GIS would assist wildlife <strong>and</strong> fisheries managementby providing spatial data collection, analysis, presentation, <strong>and</strong> storage of natural resource data. Theimpacts of LRAM, SRA, <strong>and</strong> RTLA are discussed below.SRASRA would benefit wildlife by educating soldiers to not harass fish or wildlife. Harassment is defined aspursuit with vehicles or aircraft, feeding, or shooting wildlife. Individuals who harass fish or wildlifewould be subject to prosecution. Additionally, soldiers would be directed to report any injured animals orany wildlife encountered during live-fire exercises to Range Operations. All activity must be suspendeduntil the animals leave the area.Soldiers would be directed to not disrupt large areas of woody vegetation such as willows <strong>and</strong> birchsaplings important for wildlife. Additionally, SRA would require that all barbed, commo, concertina, <strong>and</strong>trip wire is removed immediately after training exercises. These precautions would be beneficial forprotecting wildlife habitat.LRAMLRAM projects would have minor short-term adverse impacts to wildlife <strong>and</strong> would last for the durationof project activities. Most projects, on average, last approximately ten days. Expansion of drop zones maytake up to two summers to complete, but would be infrequent. Disturbance to wildlife during this timewould result from increased noise from equipment <strong>and</strong> general human activity. Activities with short-termadverse impacts include gravel extraction, road <strong>and</strong> maneuver trail upgrades, road crossings, tacticalbridge installation <strong>and</strong> vegetation removal. Estimated acres impacted from road <strong>and</strong> maneuver trailupgrades <strong>and</strong> pad hardening projects for the next five years are approximately 80 acres at FortRichardson, approximately 200 acres at Fort Wainwright, <strong>and</strong> approximately 100 acres at Donnelly<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> (Appendix A). Since LRAM projects involve maintenance <strong>and</strong> repair of existing range <strong>and</strong>training l<strong>and</strong> infrastructure, the majority of acres affected would be previously disturbed. Long-termlocalized disturbance to habitat would result from projects intended to remove or alter vegetation for longperiods of time. These projects include creation of new gravel pits, drop zones, or fire/fuel breaks._____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 41
Long-term beneficial impacts to wildlife <strong>and</strong> fisheries would result from habitat improvement projectsincluding revegetation projects that prevent erosion, stabilize soils, <strong>and</strong> restore native flora <strong>and</strong> importantforage <strong>and</strong> habitat for wildlife. Streambank stabilization practices, such as willow fascines <strong>and</strong> otherbioengineering techniques, would greatly benefit fisheries habitat as well as provide increased forage <strong>and</strong>habitat for wildlife in riparian areas. Vegetation management practices would improve wildlife habitat byproviding clearings important for edge species <strong>and</strong> by protecting existing vegetation. Estimated acresimpacted from vegetation management activities over the next five years are approximately 20 acres atFort Richardson, 140 acres at Fort Wainwright, <strong>and</strong> 900 acres at Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> (Appendix A).Of the 900 acres impacted at Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>, approximately 570 acres of impact would resultfrom a prescribed burn at Buffalo Drop Zone, a previously cleared area.Installation of barb dikes or thalweg deflectors would have short-term adverse impacts duringconstruction due to downstream siltation. Once installed, they would improve fisheries habitat by creatingincreasing pools in streams. Gabion installation would benefit desired fish species by excluding nondesiredfish from upstream migration (e.g. longnose sucker) <strong>and</strong> preventing them from out-competingdesired fish species (e.g. salmon).RTLAThe RTLA program would include avian, wetl<strong>and</strong>s, vegetation, small mammal, <strong>and</strong> large mammalmonitoring. Aerial monitoring would be conducted at Fort Wainwright <strong>and</strong> Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>and</strong>remote areas of Fort Richardson. Aerial surveys at Fort Wainwright <strong>and</strong> Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> areconducted mainly to monitor trumpeter swan nesting <strong>and</strong> broods <strong>and</strong> bison calving <strong>and</strong> tracking. Theestimated flight time for swan surveys for 2005 is 80 hours (Kellie Peirce, personal communication2005). Minor short-term adverse impacts may result from monitoring conducted by small plane orhelicopter. For more information on noise impacts, see Section 3.11, Noise.Long-term beneficial impacts to wildlife <strong>and</strong> fisheries result form RTLA monitoring. Monitoring datawould be used by Army environmental staff to guide <strong>and</strong> prioritize natural resource managementdecisions. Initial monitoring data would be used as a baseline from which future studies can be compared.Long-term monitoring would provide data to study trends in habitat <strong>and</strong> wildlife <strong>and</strong> fish populations.This data can be used to adaptively manage Army training <strong>and</strong> testing activities.Alternative 2: Implement ITAM Program through a <strong>Management</strong> Plan (Proposed Action)Under this alternative, the ITAM program would be implemented through a management plan that wouldinclude st<strong>and</strong>ard operating procedures for LRAM <strong>and</strong> RTLA projects. Impacts to wildlife <strong>and</strong> fisheries onUSARAK l<strong>and</strong>s due to TRI, LRAM, SRA, RTLA, <strong>and</strong> GIS activities would be similar to those describedunder the No Action Alternative. Implementing st<strong>and</strong>ard operating procedures for the LRAM <strong>and</strong> RTLPprograms would ensure consistent l<strong>and</strong> management <strong>and</strong> monitoring practices. St<strong>and</strong>ardizing procedureswould especially benefit LRAM activities, since adherence to best management practices (Appendix B)would increase efficiency <strong>and</strong> may reduce short-term impacts to wildlife <strong>and</strong> fisheries during projectconstruction.Alternative 3: Suspend ITAM ProgramUnder Alternative 3, all components of the ITAM program would discontinue operation. <strong>Training</strong> l<strong>and</strong>rehabilitation, maintenance, <strong>and</strong> range improvements would cease despite continued use of l<strong>and</strong> for Armytraining. In the absence of LRAM <strong>and</strong> RTLA activities, wildlife would not be disturbed by construction<strong>and</strong> monitoring. However, the benefits of LRAM <strong>and</strong> RTLA for improving <strong>and</strong> monitoring habitat <strong>and</strong>_____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 42
- Page 1: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUNITED STATES
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1: PURPOSE
- Page 7 and 8: Table 3.9 Summary of Impacts to Hum
- Page 9 and 10: and Training Land Program, the rang
- Page 11 and 12: • Establish a defined land condit
- Page 13: Donnelly Training AreaDonnelly Trai
- Page 17 and 18: determine whether additional NEPA a
- Page 19 and 20: Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental
- Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFEC
- Page 23 and 24: Maneuver Trail Maintenance and Upgr
- Page 25 and 26: Mungoven 2001). Engineering soil ty
- Page 27 and 28: projects and would result in wide,
- Page 29 and 30: growth. Wind and sand fences would
- Page 31 and 32: iological impacts of military train
- Page 33 and 34: willow scrub communities are common
- Page 35 and 36: disturbed. Further, hardening low w
- Page 37 and 38: disturbance or removal, best manage
- Page 39 and 40: SRAThrough the SRA program, soldier
- Page 41 and 42: Ship Creek (from the Glenn Highway
- Page 43 and 44: effective site drainage. Required p
- Page 45 and 46: Game 1998). More information on wil
- Page 47: Fort Wainwright and associated land
- Page 51 and 52: 1998).The Alaska Interagency Wildla
- Page 53 and 54: Prescribed burns, mechanical thinni
- Page 55 and 56: unplanned fires, soldiers are direc
- Page 57 and 58: USARAK also implemented the USARTRA
- Page 59 and 60: LRAM projects beneficial to public
- Page 61 and 62: Cumulative ImpactsPast military act
- Page 63 and 64: Two surveys conducted on Yukon Trai
- Page 65 and 66: LRAM activities under Alternative 1
- Page 67 and 68: 3.9.1 Affected EnvironmentFort Rich
- Page 69 and 70: SRA program, which educates soldier
- Page 71 and 72: 3.10.2 Environmental ConsequencesAl
- Page 73 and 74: Fort Richardson receives few compla
- Page 75 and 76: Table 3.11 Summary of Impacts 1 to
- Page 77 and 78: oads and hauling fill and rock mate
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 4: PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTO
- Page 81 and 82: Benson, A.M. 1999. Distribution of
- Page 83 and 84: Neely, R. J. 2001. Early Mining His
- Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER 6: AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS
- Page 87 and 88: Project NameBulldog TrailWidening P
- Page 89 and 90: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Demo
- Page 91 and 92: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Firi
- Page 93 and 94: Project NameEddy Drop ZoneVegetatio
- Page 95 and 96: Project Name33 Mile LoopRoad Shortc
- Page 97 and 98: APPENDIX B: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTIC
- Page 99 and 100:
Sediment Trap(Permanent) SeedingSil
- Page 101 and 102:
APPENDIX C: SAMPLE RECORD OF ENVIRO
- Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX D: ITAM PROJECT ASSESSMENT
- Page 105 and 106:
Fire ManagementYes No□ □ Could
- Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX E: AGENCY COMMENTSThe foll
- Page 109 and 110:
___________________________________
- Page 111 and 112:
___________________________________
- Page 113 and 114:
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:00 PM
- Page 115 and 116:
Second paragraph - I do not underst
- Page 117 and 118:
sentence could read, "The trees are
- Page 119 and 120:
The third paragraph seems too speci
- Page 121:
USARAK does not have a current five