Army restoration projects have mitigated damage to groundwater quality, <strong>and</strong> practices that led tocontamination have been discontinued.Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>’s surface waters are diverse <strong>and</strong> lie entirely within the Tanana River drainagebasin. A majority of the larger streams flowing through the area, such as the Delta River <strong>and</strong> Jarvis Creek,are glacial.The volume of surface water flow fluctuates dramatically by season. From October to May, flow islimited to groundwater seepage from aquifers into streams <strong>and</strong> many small streams freeze solid (zerodischarge). Any additional streamflow is converted to winter ice overflow, or “aufeis.” Aufeis is an icesheet that forms on a floodplain in winter when channels freeze solid or are otherwise dammed. Theadditional water spreads out over the frozen surface <strong>and</strong> freezes. Aufeis can accumulate several meters inthickness <strong>and</strong> cover large areas of the floodplain in streams such as the Delta River <strong>and</strong> Jarvis Creek.Snowmelt typically begins in May <strong>and</strong> reaches its peak in June, coinciding with the peak melting ofglaciers. Flows are greatest during June <strong>and</strong> July. After July, most of the snow has melted, <strong>and</strong> rainfallsustains a steady flow during August <strong>and</strong> September.The State of Alaska has designated the streams on Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> for all use classes (NancySonafrank, personnal communication 2005). Surface water quality values on Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>meet the state’s primary drinking water st<strong>and</strong>ards. However, aluminum, iron, <strong>and</strong> manganeseconcentrations were higher than the state’s secondary st<strong>and</strong>ards (USARAK 2004). High ironconcentrations are typical in streams that drain wetl<strong>and</strong> areas high in organic matter (Anderson 1970).3.4.2 Environmental ConsequencesAlternative 1: Continue ITAM Program without a <strong>Management</strong> Plan (No Action)Under the No Action Alternative, ITAM projects would continue to take place without a managementplan or st<strong>and</strong>ard operating procedures. SRA, TRI, RTLA, <strong>and</strong> GIS would continue to have beneficialimpacts to water resources. SRA would benefit water resources by educating soldiers to minimize erosion(particularly near waterways), only cross streams at designated crossings during winter, never fordwaterways, wash vehicles only at designated wash racks <strong>and</strong> never in any open body of water, use drippans when vehicles are stopped, <strong>and</strong> spill kits during any fuel or oil releases. TRI would benefit waterquality by ensuring that training does not interfere with measures taken to protect riparian areas. RTLA<strong>and</strong> GIS would benefit water quality by providing data collection, presentation, <strong>and</strong> storage capabilitiesrelated to water resource management. Soil <strong>and</strong> vegetation impacts can directly affect water quality; theseimpacts are discussed in Sections 3.1 <strong>and</strong> 3.2 respectively. LRAM impacts to water resources arediscussed below.LRAMGravel extraction, use of motorized vehicles, <strong>and</strong> vegetation management may have adverse impacts towater resources. Gravel extraction would have short-term minor adverse impacts to water quality iferosion into waterways occurs. The area of gravel extraction would be susceptible to erosion until the areaundergoes reclamation. Berms, ditches, <strong>and</strong> culverts, however, would be strategically used to minimizethese impacts. Inadvertent release of fuel or oil from vehicles used during LRAM activities would beadverse to water quality if released near waterways. Pond extraction of gravel would occur in existingman-made ponds that do not support fish or recreation. Side barrow excavation, while initially making thearea susceptible to erosion, would undergo reclamation by refilling <strong>and</strong> shaping the area to provide for_____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 35
effective site drainage. Required permits would be secured prior to any dredging or filling of waters of theU.S. under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. In addition, necessary permits would be secured prior tothe construction, excavation, or deposition of materials in, over, or under such waters, or any work whichwould affect the course, location, condition, or capacity of those waters as required under Section 10 ofthe Rivers <strong>and</strong> Harbors act.Vegetation management, including thinning, clearing, mowing, <strong>and</strong> prescribed burning, may havetemporary adverse impacts to water quality. Erosion from soil disturbance may occur with equipment use<strong>and</strong> tree removal. Erosion in riparian areas would be minimized by use of specialized equipment, such asa hydro-ax, which is designed to keep tree roots in place. The short-term impacts would be minor.Other LRAM activities would have beneficial impacts to water resources. Maintenance <strong>and</strong> repairactivities designed to reduce erosion would continue to have beneficial long-term impacts to waterquality. Erosion prevention projects include road <strong>and</strong> pad hardening, maneuver trail upgrades, gabioninstallation, streambank stabilization, low water crossing hardening, tactical bridge installation,revegetation, temporary <strong>and</strong> permanent stabilization practices, water bars, trail closure, <strong>and</strong> protectingexisting vegetation. Temporary minor adverse impacts may occur while the activities are taking place(approximately ten days). These impacts would result from minor erosion into waterways from vehicleuse <strong>and</strong> short-term soil disturbance. Long-term beneficial impacts would result from decreased erosioninto waterways.Installation of culverts would benefit water resources by enhancing or maintaining area hydrology whenroads or trails are constructed. Fish friendly culverts would be used as requested by Alaska Department ofNatural Resources. These culverts would create a more natural velocity flow of water that is better suitedfor small fish fry traveling up or down the streambed.L<strong>and</strong> grading <strong>and</strong> shaping would improve water quality by promoting adequate drainage. Installation ofpre-fabricated latrines would benefit water quality by keeping human waste from entering waterways.Restoration of wetl<strong>and</strong>s would benefit water quality since wetl<strong>and</strong>s act as natural filters for some waterpollutants <strong>and</strong> minimize flooding impacts.Best management practices (Appendix B) would be used to divert storm water in areas where runoff fromareas of higher elevation poses a threat of property damage or erosion. These practices would mitigate theimpacts from military training <strong>and</strong> construction projects <strong>and</strong> may include storm water conveyancechannels, level spreaders, outlet protection, paved flumes, gradient terraces, vegetated buffers, sedimenttraps, or check dams. Filter berms made of loose gravel, stone, or crushed rock would be used to slow,filter, <strong>and</strong> divert flow from exposed traffic areas. Storm drain inlets may be protected by gravel <strong>and</strong> cinderblocks or absorbent manufactured materials to prevent soil <strong>and</strong> pollutants from entering the storm watersewage system. For detailed descriptions of best management practices, see the USARAK ITAM<strong>Management</strong> Plan.Alternative 2: Implement ITAM Program through a <strong>Management</strong> Plan (Proposed Action)Impacts to water resources from Alternative 2 would be similar to those described under Alternative 1.St<strong>and</strong>ard procedures for all ITAM programs identified in the ITAM management plan will provideconsistent <strong>and</strong> efficient work practices. This would improve water quality by ensuring that contractorsperforming the work would adhere to the st<strong>and</strong>ard procedures designed to protect waterways._____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 36
- Page 1: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUNITED STATES
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1: PURPOSE
- Page 7 and 8: Table 3.9 Summary of Impacts to Hum
- Page 9 and 10: and Training Land Program, the rang
- Page 11 and 12: • Establish a defined land condit
- Page 13: Donnelly Training AreaDonnelly Trai
- Page 17 and 18: determine whether additional NEPA a
- Page 19 and 20: Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental
- Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFEC
- Page 23 and 24: Maneuver Trail Maintenance and Upgr
- Page 25 and 26: Mungoven 2001). Engineering soil ty
- Page 27 and 28: projects and would result in wide,
- Page 29 and 30: growth. Wind and sand fences would
- Page 31 and 32: iological impacts of military train
- Page 33 and 34: willow scrub communities are common
- Page 35 and 36: disturbed. Further, hardening low w
- Page 37 and 38: disturbance or removal, best manage
- Page 39 and 40: SRAThrough the SRA program, soldier
- Page 41: Ship Creek (from the Glenn Highway
- Page 45 and 46: Game 1998). More information on wil
- Page 47 and 48: Fort Wainwright and associated land
- Page 49 and 50: Long-term beneficial impacts to wil
- Page 51 and 52: 1998).The Alaska Interagency Wildla
- Page 53 and 54: Prescribed burns, mechanical thinni
- Page 55 and 56: unplanned fires, soldiers are direc
- Page 57 and 58: USARAK also implemented the USARTRA
- Page 59 and 60: LRAM projects beneficial to public
- Page 61 and 62: Cumulative ImpactsPast military act
- Page 63 and 64: Two surveys conducted on Yukon Trai
- Page 65 and 66: LRAM activities under Alternative 1
- Page 67 and 68: 3.9.1 Affected EnvironmentFort Rich
- Page 69 and 70: SRA program, which educates soldier
- Page 71 and 72: 3.10.2 Environmental ConsequencesAl
- Page 73 and 74: Fort Richardson receives few compla
- Page 75 and 76: Table 3.11 Summary of Impacts 1 to
- Page 77 and 78: oads and hauling fill and rock mate
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 4: PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTO
- Page 81 and 82: Benson, A.M. 1999. Distribution of
- Page 83 and 84: Neely, R. J. 2001. Early Mining His
- Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER 6: AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS
- Page 87 and 88: Project NameBulldog TrailWidening P
- Page 89 and 90: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Demo
- Page 91 and 92: Project NameYukon TrainingArea Firi
- Page 93 and 94:
Project NameEddy Drop ZoneVegetatio
- Page 95 and 96:
Project Name33 Mile LoopRoad Shortc
- Page 97 and 98:
APPENDIX B: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTIC
- Page 99 and 100:
Sediment Trap(Permanent) SeedingSil
- Page 101 and 102:
APPENDIX C: SAMPLE RECORD OF ENVIRO
- Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX D: ITAM PROJECT ASSESSMENT
- Page 105 and 106:
Fire ManagementYes No□ □ Could
- Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX E: AGENCY COMMENTSThe foll
- Page 109 and 110:
___________________________________
- Page 111 and 112:
___________________________________
- Page 113 and 114:
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:00 PM
- Page 115 and 116:
Second paragraph - I do not underst
- Page 117 and 118:
sentence could read, "The trees are
- Page 119 and 120:
The third paragraph seems too speci
- Page 121:
USARAK does not have a current five