support the management capabilities <strong>and</strong> effectiveness of all ITAM programs. Impacts of the LRAM,SRA, <strong>and</strong> RTLA programs on vegetation are discussed below.TRIThe TRI program would ensure that l<strong>and</strong> management practices meet the Army’s needs while minimizingimpacts on the environment. Range facility inventories, terrain analysis, training area configuration, <strong>and</strong>training l<strong>and</strong> distribution are measures utilized under this program to integrate natural resourceconditions, including vegetation, with range operations <strong>and</strong> training requirements.LRAMLRAM projects would reduce long-term impacts of training <strong>and</strong> testing by combining preventive <strong>and</strong>corrective l<strong>and</strong> reclamation, reshaping, rehabilitation, repair, <strong>and</strong> maintenance practices. Althoughimpacts to vegetation would be beneficial overall, generally, any projects involving clearing of vegetationor disturbing soils would have the possibility of encouraging establishment of invasive species. Suchprojects include gravel extraction; road hardening (which often results in road widening); vegetationthinning <strong>and</strong> clearing; <strong>and</strong> prescribed burning. However, revegetation <strong>and</strong> reclamation projects would alsobe used to restore native flora whenever appropriate.The most common revegetation activity on USARAK l<strong>and</strong>s is seeding exposed soils, <strong>and</strong> native seed typemixes are used whenever appropriate. The native seed mix recommendations <strong>and</strong> revegetation practicesthat would be utilized are developed by the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Cooperative ExtensionService’s A Revegetative Guide for Conservation Use in Alaska. Gravel pit reclamation projects includerecommendations for revegetation with native plants <strong>and</strong> monitoring for invasive species. Streambankstabilization practices would allow riparian vegetation to establish in previously degraded areas. Waterbars installed on roads would slow water flows <strong>and</strong> help keep soil <strong>and</strong> vegetation from washing awayduring periods of high water flow. Temporary <strong>and</strong> permanent soil stabilization practices would allowvegetation to establish <strong>and</strong> thrive. Protecting natural vegetation during construction activities would allowtheir erosion control, storm water detention, biofiltration, <strong>and</strong> aesthetic services to persist.Vegetation management practices, such as prescribed burning <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong> or mechanical thinning/clearing,reduce tree st<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> would primarily be utilized to maintain certain species compositions or seral stages(particularly for fire management purposes; see Section 3.6). H<strong>and</strong> thinning results in limited residual treedamage while some mechanical operations require pulling trees or tree clumps, which results in theremoval of the root balls <strong>and</strong> associated soil. Mowing would also be used for similar reasons, mainly tokeep drop zones as grass areas <strong>and</strong> to prevent establishment of tall vegetation. Projected thinning projectsfor the next five years include approximately 20 acres impacted at Fort Richardson <strong>and</strong> 140 acres at FortWainwright. About 100 acres impacted by mowing <strong>and</strong> 800 impacted by burning are projected atDonnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>. Installation of a firebreak is projected at Fort Wainwright <strong>and</strong> would impact 37acres (Appendix A). Fire suppression activities <strong>and</strong> installation of fire/fuel breaks <strong>and</strong> trenches wouldbenefit vegetation by reducing wildfire risk <strong>and</strong> possible impacts of wildfire.Off-road maneuver <strong>and</strong> recreation travel <strong>and</strong> driving on the sides of roads to avoid poor road conditionsdamages vegetation <strong>and</strong> encourages establishment of invasive species. This would be less likely to occurif roads were in good condition. Additionally, repeated use of firing points <strong>and</strong> bivouac sites often resultsin soil erosion <strong>and</strong> compaction <strong>and</strong> almost complete removal of shrub vegetation due to heavy vehiculartraffic. Road crossings, maneuver trail upgrade <strong>and</strong> maintenance, <strong>and</strong> hardening of roads <strong>and</strong> pads wouldhelp reduce these impacts. Projected trail upgrade <strong>and</strong> road/pad hardening projects for the next five yearsinclude approximately 85 acres impacted at Fort Richardson, 245 acres at Fort Wainwright, <strong>and</strong> 135 acresat Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> (Appendix A). Since these projects involve upgrade <strong>and</strong> maintenance ofexisting range <strong>and</strong> training l<strong>and</strong> infrastructure, the majority of acres affected would be previously_____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 27
disturbed. Further, hardening low water crossings would concentrate vehicular impacts to a specified area<strong>and</strong> minimize impacts to vegetation along the rest of streambanks. Trail closure would allow areas withcompacted or damaged vegetation to recover.Best management practices for erosion control would be utilized in support of LRAM projects (AppendixB) <strong>and</strong> would have beneficial impacts to vegetation. The erosion control best management practicesdiscussed in Section 3.1, Soil Resources, would also be beneficial to vegetation establishment <strong>and</strong>perseverance.RTLABy maintaining a balance between the use of training l<strong>and</strong>s to maximize military preparedness <strong>and</strong> theconservation of biologically diverse <strong>and</strong> functioning ecosystems, RTLA would monitor the capability oftraining l<strong>and</strong>s to meet multiple use dem<strong>and</strong>s on a sustainable basis. It would seek to help avoid excessivemilitary use that exhausts natural resources. The RTLA program would include measures for monitoringinvasive species; Alaska L<strong>and</strong> Condition Trend Analysis (AK LCTA) (described in Section 3.1); rare,threatened, <strong>and</strong> endangered species; <strong>and</strong> impacts to vegetation from military training.Invasive species monitoring would include AK LCTA surveys <strong>and</strong> forestry surveys. The AK LCTAprogram would conduct annual natural resource monitoring of training l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> would documentvegetation, including invasive species. Forestry inventories would be conducted during field seasons <strong>and</strong>would record invasive species in databases for future monitoring <strong>and</strong> management efforts.Threatened, endangered, rare, uncommon, or priority flora species are identified through planning-levelflora surveys, AK LCTA surveys, <strong>and</strong> forest monitoring. The Alaska Natural Heritage Program’s PlantTracking Database is used to guide efforts to locate uncommon plant taxa. Flora planning-level surveysare conducted every ten years <strong>and</strong> are large-scale monitoring efforts that span a variety of projects. Theirmain purpose is to document threatened <strong>and</strong> endangered species. AK LCTA conducts annual naturalresource monitoring <strong>and</strong> documents threatened, endangered, rare, uncommon, or priority plant species.Rare plant surveys are conducted in areas of potential development when needed. Forest inventoriesrecord threatened, endangered, rare, uncommon, or priority forestry species.Military activities, such as cross-country maneuvers, digging of defensive fighting positions,snowplowing in winter, <strong>and</strong> bivouacs, can disturb training areas. USARAK military exercise monitoringmethodologies would focus on monitoring training areas where military exercises are being or have beenconducted. Qualitative assessments by Environmental Resources Department staff would be conductedduring large military field training exercises to prevent undue l<strong>and</strong> damage <strong>and</strong> to ensure rapid <strong>and</strong> properremediation measures. Assessments would include optical surveying of areas where military exerciseshave occurred <strong>and</strong> documenting presence/absence, type, <strong>and</strong> degree of disturbance. Monitoring effortswould focus on ensuring military requirements for minimizing impacts to natural resources are being metduring training exercises. Requirements aimed at minimizing vegetation impacts are described in the SRAprogram above.Through monitoring both vegetation <strong>and</strong> compliance with military regulations aimed at minimizingimpacts to vegetation, the RTLA program is beneficial to vegetation resources on USARAK l<strong>and</strong>s.Alternative 2: Implement ITAM Program through a <strong>Management</strong> Plan (Proposed Action)Under this alternative, the ITAM program would be implemented through a management plan, whichwould include st<strong>and</strong>ard operating procedures for LRAM <strong>and</strong> RTLA projects. Impacts to vegetation onUSARAK l<strong>and</strong>s due to TRI, LRAM, SRA, RTLA, <strong>and</strong> GIS activities would be similar to those described_____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 28
- Page 1: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUNITED STATES
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1: PURPOSE
- Page 7 and 8: Table 3.9 Summary of Impacts to Hum
- Page 9 and 10: and Training Land Program, the rang
- Page 11 and 12: • Establish a defined land condit
- Page 13: Donnelly Training AreaDonnelly Trai
- Page 17 and 18: determine whether additional NEPA a
- Page 19 and 20: Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental
- Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFEC
- Page 23 and 24: Maneuver Trail Maintenance and Upgr
- Page 25 and 26: Mungoven 2001). Engineering soil ty
- Page 27 and 28: projects and would result in wide,
- Page 29 and 30: growth. Wind and sand fences would
- Page 31 and 32: iological impacts of military train
- Page 33: willow scrub communities are common
- Page 37 and 38: disturbance or removal, best manage
- Page 39 and 40: SRAThrough the SRA program, soldier
- Page 41 and 42: Ship Creek (from the Glenn Highway
- Page 43 and 44: effective site drainage. Required p
- Page 45 and 46: Game 1998). More information on wil
- Page 47 and 48: Fort Wainwright and associated land
- Page 49 and 50: Long-term beneficial impacts to wil
- Page 51 and 52: 1998).The Alaska Interagency Wildla
- Page 53 and 54: Prescribed burns, mechanical thinni
- Page 55 and 56: unplanned fires, soldiers are direc
- Page 57 and 58: USARAK also implemented the USARTRA
- Page 59 and 60: LRAM projects beneficial to public
- Page 61 and 62: Cumulative ImpactsPast military act
- Page 63 and 64: Two surveys conducted on Yukon Trai
- Page 65 and 66: LRAM activities under Alternative 1
- Page 67 and 68: 3.9.1 Affected EnvironmentFort Rich
- Page 69 and 70: SRA program, which educates soldier
- Page 71 and 72: 3.10.2 Environmental ConsequencesAl
- Page 73 and 74: Fort Richardson receives few compla
- Page 75 and 76: Table 3.11 Summary of Impacts 1 to
- Page 77 and 78: oads and hauling fill and rock mate
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 4: PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTO
- Page 81 and 82: Benson, A.M. 1999. Distribution of
- Page 83 and 84: Neely, R. J. 2001. Early Mining His
- Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER 6: AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS
- Page 87 and 88:
Project NameBulldog TrailWidening P
- Page 89 and 90:
Project NameYukon TrainingArea Demo
- Page 91 and 92:
Project NameYukon TrainingArea Firi
- Page 93 and 94:
Project NameEddy Drop ZoneVegetatio
- Page 95 and 96:
Project Name33 Mile LoopRoad Shortc
- Page 97 and 98:
APPENDIX B: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTIC
- Page 99 and 100:
Sediment Trap(Permanent) SeedingSil
- Page 101 and 102:
APPENDIX C: SAMPLE RECORD OF ENVIRO
- Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX D: ITAM PROJECT ASSESSMENT
- Page 105 and 106:
Fire ManagementYes No□ □ Could
- Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX E: AGENCY COMMENTSThe foll
- Page 109 and 110:
___________________________________
- Page 111 and 112:
___________________________________
- Page 113 and 114:
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:00 PM
- Page 115 and 116:
Second paragraph - I do not underst
- Page 117 and 118:
sentence could read, "The trees are
- Page 119 and 120:
The third paragraph seems too speci
- Page 121:
USARAK does not have a current five