Some mechanical operations would require pulling of trees or tree clumps, which would remove root balls<strong>and</strong> associated soil. This would initially increase erosion by removing the root systems that help absorbwater <strong>and</strong> retain soils. However, downed trees would be piled <strong>and</strong> burned, chipped <strong>and</strong> spread out, orburied <strong>and</strong> left to decompose, all of which would return nutrients to soils rather than remove biomass offsite. Prescribed burning would be typically used for drop zone management <strong>and</strong> may result in increasederosion <strong>and</strong> potential permafrost impacts through increased soil temperatures. Projected burning projectsinclude 800 acres impacted at Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> (Appendix A).Best management practices for erosion control would be utilized in support of LRAM projects (AppendixB). These would include controlling runoff from l<strong>and</strong> grading activities by creating temporary <strong>and</strong>permanent diversions or dikes that would reduce slope length, collect storm water runoff, <strong>and</strong> deflectrunoff to outlets able to convey it by non-erosive means. Gradient terraces may be incorporated into thegrading plan to shorten the slope length <strong>and</strong> reduce storm water velocity. Check dams would be used toreduce the energy of storm water <strong>and</strong> help prevent erosion. Filter berms are temporary ridges that slow,filter, <strong>and</strong> divert flow from an open traffic area <strong>and</strong> act as an efficient form of sediment control. Grasslinedchannels would also be used in some areas to filter <strong>and</strong> convey runoff, <strong>and</strong> riprap would be used inareas of concentrated runoff to prevent erosion by stabilizing slopes, drainage ways, <strong>and</strong> outlets.Vegetated buffers would reduce the velocity of storm water runoff, help prevent soil erosion, provide anarea for the runoff to permeate the soil, <strong>and</strong> act as filters to catch sediment. Temporary storm draindiversions, earth dikes, <strong>and</strong> interceptor dikes would be used to contain storm water on-site or redirectstorm water to discharge into a sediment trap or basin. Subsurface drains would be used to preventsaturated soils that can hinder growth of certain types of vegetation <strong>and</strong> sometimes cause slope failure. Ahigh water table can saturate soils <strong>and</strong> prevent growth of certain types of vegetation. Mulch or sod wouldbe applied to stabilize exposed soils <strong>and</strong> reduce storm water runoff velocity. Permanent seeding would beused to reduce erosion, decrease sediment runoff from disturbed areas, <strong>and</strong> provide permanentstabilization in disturbed areas by establishing perennial vegetative cover. Soil roughening would often beused in conjunction with l<strong>and</strong> grading <strong>and</strong> seeding practices for temporary erosion control to reducerunoff velocity, increase infiltration, reduce erosion, trap sediment, <strong>and</strong> prepare soils for seeding <strong>and</strong>planting. Chemical soil stabilization would use soil additives or palliatives (including calcium chloride<strong>and</strong> anionic asphalt, latex, or resin-water emulsions) to provide temporary soil stabilization. Soilpalliatives would only be used on mineral soils.St<strong>and</strong> pipes (drain tubes placed perpendicular to the ground in areas susceptible to ponding) would beinstalled to maintain ponding water below levels that would overtop a road or pad <strong>and</strong> would helpminimize erosion due to flooding. Cobble drains would be installed underneath roads crossing subsurfacewater flows to prevent soil saturation <strong>and</strong> road impairment. Gabions would help reduce the impactof erosive, seasonal water flows. Log cribbing may be used to retain soil or gravel firmly in place.Asphalt or reinforced concrete may be used to control erosion (particularly, at stream crossings) or toreinforce specific erosion-prone areas along roadways or within training areas. Grid pavers made ofcement or plastic would be used to line ditches or stream bottoms where vehicles cross in order to preventerosion, stabilize the creek bottom, <strong>and</strong> minimize rutting or shifting of material.Construction sequencing, which involves timing l<strong>and</strong> disturbance activities to minimize soil erosion <strong>and</strong>sedimentation, would be used. Construction entrances would be designed to minimize the amount of mud<strong>and</strong> sediment attached to motorized vehicles leaving a construction area. Temporary stream crossingswould be erected when necessary to provide streambank stabilization, reduce damage to streambeds orchannels, <strong>and</strong> minimize sediment loading from construction traffic. Soil retention structures <strong>and</strong> practiceswould be used to hold soil in place, prevent slope failure, or keep soil contained within a site boundary.Geotextiles would protect soil surfaces from wind <strong>and</strong> water erosion while also allowing vegetation_____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 21
growth. Wind <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong> fences would be used to reduce the off-site movement of fine sedimentstransported by wind. Brush barriers <strong>and</strong> silt fences would trap sediment <strong>and</strong> prevent off-site transportfrom storm water run-off. On larger sites, sediment basins <strong>and</strong> rock dams would be used to trap sediments<strong>and</strong> temporarily detain runoff. Sediment traps would be used to specifically collect sediment-laden runofffrom disturbed areas <strong>and</strong> construction sites.SRAThis component of the ITAM program would educate soldiers about the importance of preventing damageto terrain, which can decrease training realism <strong>and</strong> undermine the training mission. Damage from trainingmaneuvers could cause loss of acreage for training, safety hazards, decreased tactical maneuverability,increased maintenance costs, <strong>and</strong> loss of vegetation. The SRA program would ensure that soldiers areaware of specific environmental concerns, regulations, <strong>and</strong> restrictions intended to minimize impacts tonatural resources, including soils. These include encouraging training plans to include locations of knownsensitive areas to ensure these areas are avoided <strong>and</strong> plans for repairing maneuver damage. Whenmaneuver damage occurs, units are required to report the damage to Range Control; if found negligent,the unit may be charged for repair.Requirements instruct soldiers to observe all speed limits <strong>and</strong> stay away from the edges of roads toprevent damage to roadways <strong>and</strong> soils <strong>and</strong> vegetation adjacent to roadways. Driving on the edges causesthem to break <strong>and</strong> crumble. This can result in roads washing out when it rains, leading to further erosionproblems.Virtually all off-road traffic leads to some form of erosion, causing both operational hazards <strong>and</strong>environmental damage. Maneuver requirements direct vehicles to remain on marked trails <strong>and</strong> designatedroutes (except when directed otherwise) during tactical deployment <strong>and</strong> established roads duringadministrative time. Cross-country travel in vehicles with low ground pressure is not restricted duringwinter months when the ground is frozen <strong>and</strong> the vegetation mat <strong>and</strong> soil is protected by snowpack.During April <strong>and</strong> May, vehicles are confined to designated roads <strong>and</strong> trails during breakup. From Maythrough September, however, cross-country movement is not permitted in designated alpine areas above600 meters elevation, wetl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> creek <strong>and</strong> river bottoms.Additionally, soldiers are directed to not drive directly up steep hills <strong>and</strong> to wash vehicles only atdesignated wash racks. Digging is allowed only in approved areas, <strong>and</strong> overlays are provided by rangecontrol. All foxholes, trench systems, tank traps, hull-down positions, <strong>and</strong> explosive excavations must bebackfilled <strong>and</strong> leveled before redeployment. Soldiers are directed to stockpile the topsoil separately whenexcavating, refill <strong>and</strong> smooth-over foxholes <strong>and</strong> trenches after exercises are completed, <strong>and</strong> disassemble<strong>and</strong> scatter all overhead cover. During snow removal, soldiers are directed to not allow the bulldozer’sblade to penetrate the vegetative mat <strong>and</strong> soil beneath the snowpack. The SRA program would have abeneficial impact by helping ensure that all military requirements aimed at protecting soils are known <strong>and</strong>followed.RTLABy maintaining a balance between the use of training l<strong>and</strong>s to maximize military preparedness <strong>and</strong> theconservation of biologically diverse <strong>and</strong> functioning ecosystems, RTLA would monitor the capability oftraining l<strong>and</strong>s to meet multiple use dem<strong>and</strong>s on a sustainable basis. It would seek to help avoid excessivemilitary use that would exhaust natural resources. The RTLA program would include St<strong>and</strong>ard L<strong>and</strong>Condition Trend Analysis (LCTA), Alaska L<strong>and</strong> Condition Trend Analysis (AK LCTA), militaryexercises monitoring, <strong>and</strong> soil <strong>and</strong> water quality monitoring._____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 22
- Page 1: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUNITED STATES
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1: PURPOSE
- Page 7 and 8: Table 3.9 Summary of Impacts to Hum
- Page 9 and 10: and Training Land Program, the rang
- Page 11 and 12: • Establish a defined land condit
- Page 13: Donnelly Training AreaDonnelly Trai
- Page 17 and 18: determine whether additional NEPA a
- Page 19 and 20: Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental
- Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFEC
- Page 23 and 24: Maneuver Trail Maintenance and Upgr
- Page 25 and 26: Mungoven 2001). Engineering soil ty
- Page 27: projects and would result in wide,
- Page 31 and 32: iological impacts of military train
- Page 33 and 34: willow scrub communities are common
- Page 35 and 36: disturbed. Further, hardening low w
- Page 37 and 38: disturbance or removal, best manage
- Page 39 and 40: SRAThrough the SRA program, soldier
- Page 41 and 42: Ship Creek (from the Glenn Highway
- Page 43 and 44: effective site drainage. Required p
- Page 45 and 46: Game 1998). More information on wil
- Page 47 and 48: Fort Wainwright and associated land
- Page 49 and 50: Long-term beneficial impacts to wil
- Page 51 and 52: 1998).The Alaska Interagency Wildla
- Page 53 and 54: Prescribed burns, mechanical thinni
- Page 55 and 56: unplanned fires, soldiers are direc
- Page 57 and 58: USARAK also implemented the USARTRA
- Page 59 and 60: LRAM projects beneficial to public
- Page 61 and 62: Cumulative ImpactsPast military act
- Page 63 and 64: Two surveys conducted on Yukon Trai
- Page 65 and 66: LRAM activities under Alternative 1
- Page 67 and 68: 3.9.1 Affected EnvironmentFort Rich
- Page 69 and 70: SRA program, which educates soldier
- Page 71 and 72: 3.10.2 Environmental ConsequencesAl
- Page 73 and 74: Fort Richardson receives few compla
- Page 75 and 76: Table 3.11 Summary of Impacts 1 to
- Page 77 and 78: oads and hauling fill and rock mate
- Page 79 and 80:
CHAPTER 4: PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTO
- Page 81 and 82:
Benson, A.M. 1999. Distribution of
- Page 83 and 84:
Neely, R. J. 2001. Early Mining His
- Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER 6: AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS
- Page 87 and 88:
Project NameBulldog TrailWidening P
- Page 89 and 90:
Project NameYukon TrainingArea Demo
- Page 91 and 92:
Project NameYukon TrainingArea Firi
- Page 93 and 94:
Project NameEddy Drop ZoneVegetatio
- Page 95 and 96:
Project Name33 Mile LoopRoad Shortc
- Page 97 and 98:
APPENDIX B: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTIC
- Page 99 and 100:
Sediment Trap(Permanent) SeedingSil
- Page 101 and 102:
APPENDIX C: SAMPLE RECORD OF ENVIRO
- Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX D: ITAM PROJECT ASSESSMENT
- Page 105 and 106:
Fire ManagementYes No□ □ Could
- Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX E: AGENCY COMMENTSThe foll
- Page 109 and 110:
___________________________________
- Page 111 and 112:
___________________________________
- Page 113 and 114:
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:00 PM
- Page 115 and 116:
Second paragraph - I do not underst
- Page 117 and 118:
sentence could read, "The trees are
- Page 119 and 120:
The third paragraph seems too speci
- Page 121:
USARAK does not have a current five