3.1 SOIL RESOURCES3.1.1 Affected EnvironmentSoil is a dynamic medium made of mineral <strong>and</strong> biological matter, organic material, water, <strong>and</strong> air. Soilsare produced by the continual interaction of five soil-forming factors: climate, vegetation, organisms,parent material, <strong>and</strong> topography. Climate is the most important soil-forming factor for Alaska.Differences in soil composition <strong>and</strong> formation result in soils of differing properties, which are alsocontinually altered by natural processes. Soil properties ultimately determine the natural <strong>and</strong> humanactivities that can take place in a given area.Permafrost is defined as soil, silt, <strong>and</strong> rock that remain frozen year-round. Though a thin layer may thawduring summer months, the majority of permafrost remains frozen until the local climate changes or itmelts due to disturbance of the insulating peat <strong>and</strong> vegetation above it. Permafrost is a major factorinfluencing the distribution of vegetation <strong>and</strong> human activities in Alaska. It typically exists in multiplelayers of varying thickness ranging from less than one foot to more than 150 feet. Permafrost hasimportant influences on soil processes including cryoturbation (the mixing of soil due to freezing <strong>and</strong>thawing which results in contorted <strong>and</strong> broken horizons), rapid water runoff, ground subsidence <strong>and</strong>restriction of drainage. Thermokarst is the process <strong>and</strong> range of features resulting from irregularsubsidence of permafrost. These features include hummocks <strong>and</strong> mounds, water-filled depressions,flooded forests, <strong>and</strong> mudflows on sloping ground.More information can be found in the Transformation of U.S. Army Alaska <strong>Final</strong> Environmental ImpactStatement (USARAK 2004).Fort RichardsonSoil maps utilizing the Unified Soil Classification System describe a wide variety of engineering soiltypes on Fort Richardson. Glacial moraines, outwash, tidal flats, <strong>and</strong> peat bogs all provide a wide varietyof parent material for soils at the installation (USARAK 2004). The soils are shallow, immature, <strong>and</strong>deficient in primary plant nutrients <strong>and</strong> water retention ability, making them a primary limiting factor forvegetative growth during dry periods. In depressions <strong>and</strong> saturated areas, such as wetl<strong>and</strong>s, surfacehorizons may be covered with peat (USARAK 2002e). A soil survey of the Anchorage area conducted bythe Natural Resources Conservation Service identified two distinct climatic zones along with theirassociated soil types (Moore 2002) – the lowl<strong>and</strong>s surrounding Anchorage (including Fort Richardson)<strong>and</strong> the adjacent Chugach Mountains.Permafrost is found in less than 1% of Fort Richardson. It occurs primarily in patches of forested bogsnear Muldoon Road, with some permafrost persisting at high elevations. Although thermokarst hasoccurred in the forested bog areas, the effects of thermokarst have been negligible (
Mungoven 2001). Engineering soil types found at Fort Wainwright consist dominantly of silt on the hillswith wetter <strong>and</strong> more organic silty soils in the lower drainages (USARAK 2004).Most of the soils on Main Post are Chena alluvium, formed in unconsolidated silt-gravel mixture. Soils atTanana Flats <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> are formed in various unconsolidated materials <strong>and</strong> are dominated by highlyorganic, wet, <strong>and</strong> cold soils (Rieger et al. 1979). The south slopes of the mountainous Yukon <strong>Training</strong><strong>Area</strong> consist of well-drained silt loams, while north-facing slopes are shallow, gravelly, silt loams.Drainage bottoms <strong>and</strong> depressions consist of shallow gravelly, silt loam covered with a thick layer of peat(BLM <strong>and</strong> U.S. Army 1994).On Main Post, permafrost occurs at variable depths with discontinuous permafrost lying just beneath thesurface in some areas. Most of Tanana Flats <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> is underlain by continuous or discontinuouspermafrost. Permafrost lies within 20 inches of the surface <strong>and</strong> is nearly 128 feet thick in some places(USARAK 2002f). Tanana Flats is experiencing rapid <strong>and</strong> widespread thermokarst as a result ofdegrading permafrost. Eventually this will dramatically alter the structure <strong>and</strong> function of ecosystems inpermafrost-dominated areas. Yukon <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> is in the discontinuous permafrost zone of Alaskawhere perennially frozen ground is widespread. The thick layers of peat typical of both north slopes <strong>and</strong>drainage bottoms/depressions are underlain by permafrost, while south slopes are generally free ofpermafrost (BLM <strong>and</strong> U.S. Army 1994).Fort Wainwright’s <strong>Integrated</strong> Natural Resources <strong>Management</strong> Plan (USARAK 2002f) indicated militaryactivity has its greatest impacts on soil productivity in the Main Post area due to construction. Soils inother areas have been impacted by military activities, localized around small arms ranges, roads, <strong>and</strong>other facilities. The Stuart Creek Impact <strong>Area</strong>, located in the Yukon <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>, may have had moresevere erosion due to explosions <strong>and</strong> burning, but overall, soils on Fort Wainwright have been relativelyunaffected by military training (USARAK 2002f).Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>Soils in Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> are primarily derived from glacial activities, modified by streams <strong>and</strong>discontinuous permafrost, <strong>and</strong> in many places overlain by loess. Few soils in Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>have been mapped in detail, with the exception of areas near the Main Post cantonment area. The NaturalResources Conservation Service has identified 12 soil associations in the area (Rieger et al. 1979). Soilsin the northern, west-central, <strong>and</strong> eastern portions of Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> West were identified as siltloamassociations, while Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> East was described as a shallow silt-loam over gravellys<strong>and</strong>. Engineering soil types found at Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> are highly variable due to the diversegeomorphic l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> sediments comprising it (USARAK 2004).Soils at Gerstle River <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> are described as poorly drained with mottled gray, gravelly silt ors<strong>and</strong>y loam beneath the thick surface mat of peat. Soils on the western portion of Black Rapids <strong>Training</strong><strong>Area</strong> were developed in glacial till <strong>and</strong> most are poorly drained. Bedrock outcrops on peaks <strong>and</strong> ridges<strong>and</strong> loose rubble occur in many high areas. Well-drained soils have developed in very gravelly material atthe foot of high ridges <strong>and</strong> on some south-facing slopes <strong>and</strong> hilly moraines at lower elevations. Theeastern portion of the training area is classified only as rough mountainous l<strong>and</strong> in a 1979 exploratorysurvey (Rieger et al. 1979).Permafrost is highly patchy <strong>and</strong> irregular on Donnelly <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong>, particularly in morainal areas whereabrupt changes in slope <strong>and</strong> aspect occur (Jorgenson et al. 2001). The highly variable sediment types,_____________________________________________________________________________________________Environmental AssessmentUnited States Army Alaska, <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Program<strong>Management</strong> Plan 18
- Page 1: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUNITED STATES
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1: PURPOSE
- Page 7 and 8: Table 3.9 Summary of Impacts to Hum
- Page 9 and 10: and Training Land Program, the rang
- Page 11 and 12: • Establish a defined land condit
- Page 13: Donnelly Training AreaDonnelly Trai
- Page 17 and 18: determine whether additional NEPA a
- Page 19 and 20: Table 2.2 Summary of Environmental
- Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFEC
- Page 23: Maneuver Trail Maintenance and Upgr
- Page 27 and 28: projects and would result in wide,
- Page 29 and 30: growth. Wind and sand fences would
- Page 31 and 32: iological impacts of military train
- Page 33 and 34: willow scrub communities are common
- Page 35 and 36: disturbed. Further, hardening low w
- Page 37 and 38: disturbance or removal, best manage
- Page 39 and 40: SRAThrough the SRA program, soldier
- Page 41 and 42: Ship Creek (from the Glenn Highway
- Page 43 and 44: effective site drainage. Required p
- Page 45 and 46: Game 1998). More information on wil
- Page 47 and 48: Fort Wainwright and associated land
- Page 49 and 50: Long-term beneficial impacts to wil
- Page 51 and 52: 1998).The Alaska Interagency Wildla
- Page 53 and 54: Prescribed burns, mechanical thinni
- Page 55 and 56: unplanned fires, soldiers are direc
- Page 57 and 58: USARAK also implemented the USARTRA
- Page 59 and 60: LRAM projects beneficial to public
- Page 61 and 62: Cumulative ImpactsPast military act
- Page 63 and 64: Two surveys conducted on Yukon Trai
- Page 65 and 66: LRAM activities under Alternative 1
- Page 67 and 68: 3.9.1 Affected EnvironmentFort Rich
- Page 69 and 70: SRA program, which educates soldier
- Page 71 and 72: 3.10.2 Environmental ConsequencesAl
- Page 73 and 74: Fort Richardson receives few compla
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 3.11 Summary of Impacts 1 to
- Page 77 and 78:
oads and hauling fill and rock mate
- Page 79 and 80:
CHAPTER 4: PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTO
- Page 81 and 82:
Benson, A.M. 1999. Distribution of
- Page 83 and 84:
Neely, R. J. 2001. Early Mining His
- Page 85 and 86:
CHAPTER 6: AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS
- Page 87 and 88:
Project NameBulldog TrailWidening P
- Page 89 and 90:
Project NameYukon TrainingArea Demo
- Page 91 and 92:
Project NameYukon TrainingArea Firi
- Page 93 and 94:
Project NameEddy Drop ZoneVegetatio
- Page 95 and 96:
Project Name33 Mile LoopRoad Shortc
- Page 97 and 98:
APPENDIX B: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTIC
- Page 99 and 100:
Sediment Trap(Permanent) SeedingSil
- Page 101 and 102:
APPENDIX C: SAMPLE RECORD OF ENVIRO
- Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX D: ITAM PROJECT ASSESSMENT
- Page 105 and 106:
Fire ManagementYes No□ □ Could
- Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX E: AGENCY COMMENTSThe foll
- Page 109 and 110:
___________________________________
- Page 111 and 112:
___________________________________
- Page 113 and 114:
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:00 PM
- Page 115 and 116:
Second paragraph - I do not underst
- Page 117 and 118:
sentence could read, "The trees are
- Page 119 and 120:
The third paragraph seems too speci
- Page 121:
USARAK does not have a current five