01.12.2012 Views

OrcaFlex Manual - Orcina

OrcaFlex Manual - Orcina

OrcaFlex Manual - Orcina

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VIV Toolbox, Time Domain Models<br />

Our experience of the Milan Model<br />

466<br />

w<br />

� If a line end node doesn't move at all (e.g. because it is fixed) then the wake oscillation does not develop and so<br />

the Vortex Force decays to zero. The Milan model is therefore not suitable for predicting the vortex force on<br />

fixed line end nodes.<br />

� We have run the Milan model for the case of a simple spring-mounted cylinder, and compared the results with<br />

the empirically based response curve published by Skop and Balasubramanian. For details contact <strong>Orcina</strong>.<br />

� We have also run the Milan model for flexible riser cases and compared it against experimental results. The<br />

results so far suggest that the Milan model is reasonable for cases where the flow velocity is uniform along the<br />

riser, but the model is less satisfactory when the flow velocity varies a lot along the riser.<br />

Iwan and Blevins Wake Oscillator Model<br />

This wake oscillator model is as published by Iwan and Blevins. In their paper the model is developed from<br />

theoretical considerations of momentum, and the hidden wake degree of freedom is such that its rate of change is a<br />

measure of the fluid momentum in the transverse direction.<br />

The resulting model makes the wake degree of freedom obey a Van der Pol equation. This is a type of equation that<br />

has been used in other wake oscillator models, and it is known to have VIV-type characteristics such as frequency<br />

lock-in.<br />

The authors calibrated the model against experimental results for fixed and forced cylinders, and then compared the<br />

model's predictions against experimental results for spring-mounted cylinders.<br />

In addition note that the force generated by the Iwan and Blevins model (unlike the Milan wake oscillator model)<br />

includes the standard Morison drag force in the transverse direction. When this model is used <strong>OrcaFlex</strong> therefore<br />

suppresses the transverse component of the usual drag force, so the drag coefficient specified for the transverse<br />

direction is not used.<br />

Results<br />

The Vortex Force is available as a line force results variable. This reports the total lift and drag force. Note that this is<br />

the sum of the force generated by the wake oscillator model, which is in the transverse direction but doesn't include<br />

the drag force in that direction, plus the standard Morison drag force in the inline, transverse and axial directions.<br />

Transverse VIV Offset is also available as a line position results variable.<br />

9.2.2 Vortex Tracking Models<br />

Overview<br />

Two vortex tracking models are available in <strong>OrcaFlex</strong>, which we refer to by number: Vortex Tracking (1) and Vortex<br />

Tracking (2). Both are based on the underlying physical equations of boundary layer theory and the Navier-Stokes<br />

equation. As a result they introduce physical realism that is absent from the wake oscillator models.<br />

Vorticity is a measure of a fluid's rotation and it is often advantageous to analyse fluid dynamics in terms of<br />

vorticity. The reason for this is that the vorticity is often confined to narrow sheet-like regions and the important<br />

fluid forces on a body in the flow are intimately related to the vorticity. One can focus on the sheet-like regions and<br />

this is far more efficient from a computational point of view. Vortex methods are prevalent throughout<br />

computational fluid dynamics.<br />

The vortex tracking models are much more computationally demanding than the wake oscillator models. In fact they<br />

are a type of computational fluid dynamic model, but they are much less computationally demanding than 'full'<br />

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Work to date shows considerable promise, and we hope they will offer a<br />

practical analysis technique which gives much of the realism of full CFD without the associated extremely long run<br />

times.<br />

The vortex tracking models model the full fluid flow field. In <strong>OrcaFlex</strong> the vortex tracking models are used to give<br />

the force acting on the line, but they can also give other results, such as the fluid velocity and pressure at any point.<br />

For example we have experimentally used them to calculate the pressure variations on the line surface due to VIV. If<br />

other results such as these interest you then please contact <strong>Orcina</strong> for further details.<br />

The vortex tracking models are based on the relative velocity of the flow past the line. They can therefore be used<br />

both for cases where the excitation is due to current or waves, and also where the excitation is due to the line<br />

moving, for example towed cases.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!