01.12.2012 Views

OrcaFlex Manual - Orcina

OrcaFlex Manual - Orcina

OrcaFlex Manual - Orcina

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

w<br />

309<br />

System Modelling: Data and Results, Lines<br />

need to make some assumptions about how the line was originally laid and friction is then assumed to act towards<br />

this position.<br />

If the Step 1 Statics Method is Prescribed, then this 'originally laid' position is assumed to be the position defined by<br />

the Prescribed track. Otherwise, the 'originally laid' position is defined by specifying the Lay Azimuth and As Laid<br />

Tension values.<br />

Lay Azimuth<br />

This data is only used when seabed friction is included in the static analysis and the Step 1 Statics Method is not<br />

Prescribed. It then defines the position in which the line is assumed to have been originally laid, and friction is then<br />

assumed to act towards this position. When Statics Method is not Prescribed, it is assumed that:<br />

1. The line was originally laid, with the specified As Laid Tension, starting with the Bottom End at its specified<br />

position (or at the point on the seabed directly below, if the Bottom End is not on the seabed).<br />

2. The line was then laid in the Lay Azimuth direction, leading away from the Bottom End position and with the<br />

specified As Laid Tension.<br />

3. The line was laid following the profile of the seabed.<br />

4. The Top End was then moved slowly from that original position to its specified position.<br />

To help set this data item, there is a button on the form marked Set Lay Azimuth. This button sets the Lay Azimuth<br />

value to be the direction from the Bottom End towards the Top End, based on their current positions.<br />

Notes: Whilst the program will accept any Lay Azimuth, we would expect the statics convergence routine<br />

to have increasing difficulty in finding a solution as the angle between the Lay Azimuth direction<br />

and the vertical plane through the line ends increases. For example, if we have a line top at X=0,<br />

Y=0, and anchor at X=100, Y=0, we would expect trouble for a Lay Direction of 90°.<br />

As Laid Tension<br />

The Line Setup Wizard also uses the Lay Azimuth direction.<br />

This data specifies the effective tension with which the line was originally laid. <strong>OrcaFlex</strong> uses this to determine the<br />

as-laid node positions, which are used as the friction target positions towards which friction acts in the static<br />

analysis. This data is therefore only used if friction is included in statics.<br />

If the Step 1 Statics Method is set to Prescribed starting shape, then the statics friction target positions are laid out<br />

along the prescribed shape with a strain determined by the axial stiffness and this As Laid Effective Tension value.<br />

If the Step 1 Statics Method is not Prescribed, then this data is used as described in the Lay Azimuth section above.<br />

Catenary Convergence<br />

If the Catenary statics method is chosen, then an iterative catenary calculation is used to determine the static<br />

position of the line. This calculation is controlled by a number of convergence parameters which can normally be left<br />

at their default values. However sometimes the calculation can fail to converge. If this happens, first check your data<br />

for errors and check for the following common causes of convergence failure:<br />

� Does the solution have a slack segment? This can happen in lines that touch down on the seabed almost at right<br />

angles or in lines that hang in a very narrow U shape. The catenary calculation cannot handle lines with slack<br />

segments – try increasing the number of segments in the relevant section of the line.<br />

� For lines that touch down on the seabed, is the Lay Azimuth value specified correctly? It is the azimuth direction<br />

leading away from End B and it is easy to get it wrong by 180°.<br />

� Is the line buoyant, either deliberately or by mistake. The catenary calculation has problems with floating lines –<br />

you may need to use the Spline statics method instead.<br />

� Does the line have a surface-piercing buoyant clump attached? If the clump is short then the catenary<br />

calculation is more difficult.<br />

If the calculation still fails to converge, then it is sometimes possible to obtain convergence by changing one or more<br />

of the convergence parameters, as outlined below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!