01.12.2012 Views

OrcaFlex Manual - Orcina

OrcaFlex Manual - Orcina

OrcaFlex Manual - Orcina

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

w<br />

241<br />

System Modelling: Data and Results, Environment<br />

generated for each wave component and added assuming linear superposition. <strong>OrcaFlex</strong> currently allows you to<br />

specify the number of wave components to use; more components give greater realism but a greater computing<br />

overhead.<br />

The time history generated is just one of an infinite number of possible wave trains which correspond to the chosen<br />

spectrum – in fact there are an infinite number of wave trains which could be generated from 100 components, a<br />

further infinite set from 101 components and so on.<br />

Strictly speaking, we should use a full Fourier series representation of the wave system which would typically have<br />

several thousand components (the number depends on the required duration of the simulation and the integration<br />

time step). This is prohibitively expensive in computing time so we use a much reduced number of components, as<br />

noted above. However, this does involve some loss of randomness in the time history generated. For a discussion of<br />

the consequences of this approach, see Tucker et al (1984).<br />

Finding a Suitable Design Wave<br />

A frequent requirement is to find a section of random sea which includes a wave corresponding in height and period<br />

to a specified design wave. <strong>OrcaFlex</strong> provides preview facilities for this purpose. If you are looking for a large wave<br />

in a random sea, say Hmax = 1.9Hs, then use the List Events command (on the Waves Preview page of the<br />

environment data form) to ask for a listing of waves with height > H=1.7Hs, say. It is worth looking over a reasonably<br />

long period of time at first – say t = 0s to 50,000s or even 100,000s. <strong>OrcaFlex</strong> will then search that time period and<br />

list wave rises and falls which meet the criterion you have specified.<br />

Suppose that the list shows a wave fall at t = 647s which is close to your requirement. Then you can use the View<br />

Profile command to inspect this part of the wave train, by asking <strong>OrcaFlex</strong> to draw the sea surface elevation for the<br />

period from t = 600s to t = 700s, say. You will then see the large wave with the smaller waves which precede and<br />

follow it.<br />

Note that when you use the preview facility you have to specify both the time and the location (X,Y coordinates). A<br />

random wave train varies in both time and space, so for waves going in the positive X direction (wave direction =<br />

0°), the wave train at X = 0 differs from that at X = 300m.<br />

You can use the preview facility to examine the wave at different critical points for your system. For example, you<br />

may be analysing a system in which lines are connected between Ship A at X = 0 and Ship B at X = 300m. It is worth<br />

checking that a wave train which gives a design wave at Ship A does not simultaneously include an even higher wave<br />

at Ship B. If you want to investigate system response to a specified design wave at both Ship A and Ship B, then you<br />

will usually have to do the analysis twice, once with the design wave at Ship A and once at Ship B.<br />

If no wave of the required characteristics can be found, then adjust Hs and Tz slightly and repeat. As we noted above,<br />

the important point is to get the design wave we want embedded in a realistic random train of smaller waves. This is<br />

often conveniently done by small adjustments to Hs and Tz. We need make no apology for this. In the real world,<br />

even in a stationary sea state, the instantaneous wave spectrum varies considerably and Hs and Tz with it. For<br />

further discussion see Tucker et al (1984).<br />

If you are using an ISSC spectrum, or a JONSWAP spectrum with constant γ, then you can make use of some useful<br />

scaling rules at this point. In these 2 cases, provided the number of wave components and the seed are held<br />

constant, then:<br />

� For constant Tz, wave elevation at any time and any location is directly proportional to Hs. For example, if you<br />

have found a wave at time t which has the period you require but is 5% low in height, increasing Hs by 5% will<br />

give you the wave you want, also at time t.<br />

� For constant Hs, the time between successive wave crests at the origin (X = 0, Y = 0) is proportional to Tz. For<br />

example, if you have found a wave at the origin at time t which has the height you require but the period<br />

between crests is 5% less than you want, increasing Tz by 5% will give you the wave you want, but at time 1.05t.<br />

Note: This rule does not apply in general except at the origin of global coordinates.<br />

These scaling rules can be helpful when conducting a study of system behaviour in a range of wave heights. We can<br />

select a suitable wave train for one wave height and scale to each of the other wave heights. This gives a systematic<br />

variation in wave excitation for which we may expect a systematic variation in response. If the wave trains were<br />

independently derived, then there would be additional scatter.<br />

Wave Statistics<br />

The following is based on Tucker (1991).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!