Initial Report and Recommendations - Alaska Department of Law
Initial Report and Recommendations - Alaska Department of Law Initial Report and Recommendations - Alaska Department of Law
. Exchange of Information. The members of the Commission agree toexchange information in good faith. Members agree to provideinformation in advance of the meeting where such information will benecessary. All members agree not to divulge information shared by othersin confidence outside of Full Commission and Work Group meetings.c. Compensation for Services. Members of the Commission shall receiveno pay, allowance or benefits by reason of their service on theCommission.d. Costs and Expenses. Each member of the Commission may bereimbursed for their reasonable travel costs and expenses related to theirwork on behalf of the Commission. Requests for reimbursement shall bedirected to the Alaska Native Justice Center.The Commission held its first meeting on October 12 and 13, 2004. It met againon October 27, also the date of the first public testimony, which took place during theannual Alaska Federation of Natives convention in Anchorage. A pivotal meeting tookplace a bit later in Fairbanks on November 10, 2004. At that time the Commissiondecided to establish four workgroups, one for each of the four topic areas that had beenprescribed by the congressional language for the Commission to address in rural Alaska:Law Enforcement, Judiciary, Alcohol Importation, and Domestic Violence/Child Abuse.The members of the Commission agreed to have 12 or fewer members in each ofthe four workgroups. At the Commission’s request, staff of the Alaska Native JusticeCenter, the Alaska Federation of Natives, and the Alaska Inter-Tribal Council drafted apreliminary list of potential workgroup members, which was reviewed and revised by theCommission. At the next business meeting, held in Anchorage on November 19, 2004,the Commission members voted unanimously to appoint the recommended individuals tothe four workgroups.Meetings and Audio-conferencesThere were two critical aspects of the Commission’s input from the public inAlaska. One was the aforementioned involvement of a large number of knowledgeableindividuals – totaling over 70 – in the workgroups, and the second was gatheringinformation and input from a wide range of individuals who offered testimony, bothorally and in writing, during 15 public hearings that were held at 11 locations in Alaska,concerning the four topic areas that the Commission was addressing.The dates and locations of the public hearings are listed below, and copies of thewritten testimony and transcripts of the oral testimony can be reviewed on theCommission’s website: www.akjusticecommission.com.Alaska Rural Justice and Law Enforcement Commission - Page 36
Date Location Date Location10/27/04 Anchorage 02/23/05 Nome11/10/04 Fairbanks 02/24/05 Kotzebue12/10/04 Anchorage 03/15/05 Barrow01/05/05 Sitka 03/16/05 Fairbanks01/06/05 Juneau 04/06/05 Bethel01/26/05 Anchorage 04/26/05 Mentasta01/27/05 Anchorage 04/29/05 Kake02/09/05 Dillingham 50Business meetingsThe Commission held business meetings that were open to the public, 51 frequentlypreceding or following the public hearings. During the business meetings, discussionsincluded such issues as arranging for future public hearings and the ways in which theCommissioners would receive the options developed by the four workgroups, reviewthem, adopt or revise them, and incorporate them into the Initial Report andRecommendations to Congress and the Alaska Legislature.As mentioned earlier, at the Commission’s November meeting in Fairbanks, fourworkgroups were established. Three of the four were composed of approximately 12individuals who were selected because of their current and/or prior experiences andinvolvement in the topic area. The fourth, to address the wide range of problems relatedto domestic violence and child abuse, was larger, which was a result of the expectation onthe part of the Commissioners and support staff that that group would choose tosubdivide into two smaller groups, one to address domestic violence and the other toaddress child abuse.A list of all of the workgroup members is included in Appendix D of this report,and the majority are shown in the photograph in Appendix E.D. Workgroup ActivitiesThe workgroups met for the first time in Anchorage on January 27 and 28, 2005.After a charge from Co-chairs Burgess and Renkes, the workgroup members commencedto devise ways in which they could tackle the problems and issues that lay before them,as established by the language in the Act. Following this two-day face-to-face session,the workgroups met by telephone conferences once weekly for nine weeks. 52 Thesessions for some of the workgroups routinely lasted at least two hours, while the alcoholimportation workgroup meetings were more often than not about one hour in length. Thediscussions centered around the language in the Act and also the task-and-topic-area505152Conducted telephonically after flight conditions made it impossible for the Commission to attend thehearing scheduled in Dillingham on February 8, 2005.With the exception of occasional executive sessions during the public meetings.Workgroup 2, Judicial, held eight telephone conference meetings but had one additional face-to-facemeeting.Alaska Rural Justice and Law Enforcement Commission - Page 37
- Page 2 and 3: IntroductionFor years, Alaska Nativ
- Page 4 and 5: In MemoriamEric D. JohnsonApril 27,
- Page 6 and 7: continuous. Those who worked hardes
- Page 8 and 9: Executive SummaryCreated by Congres
- Page 10 and 11: 8. Increase Access to Judicial Serv
- Page 12 and 13: Chapter I. Statement of NeedThe Ala
- Page 14 and 15: When domestic violence services are
- Page 16 and 17: With the advent of statehood in 195
- Page 18 and 19: Village Council Presidents, Bristol
- Page 20 and 21: “[M]any of the laws that we have
- Page 22 and 23: “[W]e’re 10 times the national
- Page 24 and 25: Great contrast exists today between
- Page 26 and 27: The literature has often decried th
- Page 28 and 29: Another resource on economic opport
- Page 30 and 31: The continuing escalation of fuel c
- Page 32 and 33: In 1999, in an effort to curb youth
- Page 34 and 35: and follow-up contacts. Since it wa
- Page 36 and 37: Chapter II. Charge to the Commissio
- Page 38 and 39: ♦ Gail Schubert, Executive Vice P
- Page 40 and 41: additional time to a person speakin
- Page 44 and 45: sheets that had been prepared by th
- Page 46 and 47: Chapter IIIResponse and Recommendat
- Page 48 and 49: • Developing voluntary memoranda
- Page 50 and 51: example, during a protracted negoti
- Page 52 and 53: staffing in Alaska is a significant
- Page 54 and 55: history of being in a community for
- Page 56 and 57: “The State of Alaska is mandated
- Page 58 and 59: “The AFN Sobriety program provide
- Page 60 and 61: community enhances alienation and i
- Page 62 and 63: oth the state and the federal gover
- Page 64 and 65: enforcement programs. In this proce
- Page 66 and 67: skills necessary to communicate wit
- Page 68 and 69: and others in the tribal community
- Page 70 and 71: A Comparison of Alaska and the Lowe
- Page 72 and 73: Map Showing the Location of All Ala
- Page 74 and 75: Appendix BBiographical Sketchesof C
- Page 76 and 77: Revenue. Mayor Botelho became Deput
- Page 78 and 79: His wide range of experience includ
- Page 80 and 81: Alaska Rural Justice and Law Enforc
- Page 82 and 83: Workgroup MembersWorkgroup 1: Law E
- Page 84 and 85: Appendix EPhotograph of Commissione
- Page 86 and 87: Appendix FCommission Recommendation
- Page 88 and 89: ) Power differential between govern
- Page 90 and 91: 9. Adequate legal infrastructure to
. Exchange <strong>of</strong> Information. The members <strong>of</strong> the Commission agree toexchange information in good faith. Members agree to provideinformation in advance <strong>of</strong> the meeting where such information will benecessary. All members agree not to divulge information shared by othersin confidence outside <strong>of</strong> Full Commission <strong>and</strong> Work Group meetings.c. Compensation for Services. Members <strong>of</strong> the Commission shall receiveno pay, allowance or benefits by reason <strong>of</strong> their service on theCommission.d. Costs <strong>and</strong> Expenses. Each member <strong>of</strong> the Commission may bereimbursed for their reasonable travel costs <strong>and</strong> expenses related to theirwork on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Commission. Requests for reimbursement shall bedirected to the <strong>Alaska</strong> Native Justice Center.The Commission held its first meeting on October 12 <strong>and</strong> 13, 2004. It met againon October 27, also the date <strong>of</strong> the first public testimony, which took place during theannual <strong>Alaska</strong> Federation <strong>of</strong> Natives convention in Anchorage. A pivotal meeting tookplace a bit later in Fairbanks on November 10, 2004. At that time the Commissiondecided to establish four workgroups, one for each <strong>of</strong> the four topic areas that had beenprescribed by the congressional language for the Commission to address in rural <strong>Alaska</strong>:<strong>Law</strong> Enforcement, Judiciary, Alcohol Importation, <strong>and</strong> Domestic Violence/Child Abuse.The members <strong>of</strong> the Commission agreed to have 12 or fewer members in each <strong>of</strong>the four workgroups. At the Commission’s request, staff <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Alaska</strong> Native JusticeCenter, the <strong>Alaska</strong> Federation <strong>of</strong> Natives, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Alaska</strong> Inter-Tribal Council drafted apreliminary list <strong>of</strong> potential workgroup members, which was reviewed <strong>and</strong> revised by theCommission. At the next business meeting, held in Anchorage on November 19, 2004,the Commission members voted unanimously to appoint the recommended individuals tothe four workgroups.Meetings <strong>and</strong> Audio-conferencesThere were two critical aspects <strong>of</strong> the Commission’s input from the public in<strong>Alaska</strong>. One was the aforementioned involvement <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> knowledgeableindividuals – totaling over 70 – in the workgroups, <strong>and</strong> the second was gatheringinformation <strong>and</strong> input from a wide range <strong>of</strong> individuals who <strong>of</strong>fered testimony, bothorally <strong>and</strong> in writing, during 15 public hearings that were held at 11 locations in <strong>Alaska</strong>,concerning the four topic areas that the Commission was addressing.The dates <strong>and</strong> locations <strong>of</strong> the public hearings are listed below, <strong>and</strong> copies <strong>of</strong> thewritten testimony <strong>and</strong> transcripts <strong>of</strong> the oral testimony can be reviewed on theCommission’s website: www.akjusticecommission.com.<strong>Alaska</strong> Rural Justice <strong>and</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Enforcement Commission - Page 36