Detailed Soil Survey of the Mount Revelstoke Summit Area.

Detailed Soil Survey of the Mount Revelstoke Summit Area. Detailed Soil Survey of the Mount Revelstoke Summit Area.

sis.agr.gc.ca
from sis.agr.gc.ca More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

TABLE B. CLASSES OF FRAGILITY FOR SOILS AND MISCELLANEOUS LAND UNITS, MOUNT REVELSTOKE SUMMIT AREA .Class Definition and Attributes of Class Soil Units0 No susceptibility to damage . This rating is applied to non-soil R (bedrock)areas such as bedrock exposures and coarse colluvial (talus) T (talus)deposits .1 Moderate susceptibility to damage . Soils, in this class are 1/E, 8/C, 8/Emoderately susceptible to erosion . These are well-drainedsoils on slopes of less than 15 percent gradient .2 High susceptibility to damage . Soils in this class are highly 4/C, 6/B, 6/C, 3/Cerodible or susceptible to disturbance by trampling. Well- and all map units ondrained soils on 15 to 60 percent slopes and poorly-drained soils F to G slopeswith silty surface textures or organic layers on slopes of less except 4/F and 5/Fthan 5 percent are included in this class . Erosion preventivemeasures are definitely required if the vegetation cover isremoved from the steeply sloping soils .3 Very high susceptibility to damage . Soils in this class are very 4/D, 4/E, 4/F, 5/Fhighly erodible and may also be susceptible to disturbance byand all map units ontrampling . Well-drained soils on slopes greater than 60 percent H slopes except R/Hgradient and poorly-drained soils on 5 to 30 percent slopes areincluded in this class . These soils should not be used for sitedevelopment if any alternatives are possible . There is a definiterisk that erosion preventive practices would not be successful .

following removal of vegetation .Soil properties such as texture,organic matter content, bulk density, infiltration and percolationrates, drainage conditions, slope stability, and especially slopeangle have all been evaluated in the estimation of soil erosionpotential .A more comprehensive discussion of erodibility of thesoils of the Summit area may be found on pages 50 - 51 .The soils and miscellaneous land units have been grouped intofour classes of damage susceptibility described in Table B .DiscussionThe rating can be used to aid the planning of recreationaldevelopment because it indicates the relative durability of vegetationand soils .It is not directed to specific uses such as campgrounds andpicnic areas, but the ordering of the units for these uses would likelybe the same as for random trampling .The basic application of the rating system isto minimizedamage by avoiding use of areas atthe fragile end of the scale andchanneling intensive traffic through the most resilient areas .However,planning decisions cannot be made that easily .Some vegetation fragilityclasses at the more resistant end of the scale coincide with fragilesoil classes .In the derivation of the fragility classes, no accounthas been taken of the rarity of vegetation types .For example, vegetationclass 4 includes Cassiope mertensiana stands which, although hardier, areless extensive than the mixed herbaceous meadows in vegetation class 5or the stands of Vaccinium membranaceum beneath sub-alpine fir in vegetationclass 6 .Value judgments therefore have to be made and it may be moredesirable to sacrifice part of an extensive though fragile vegetation type

following removal <strong>of</strong> vegetation .<strong>Soil</strong> properties such as texture,organic matter content, bulk density, infiltration and percolationrates, drainage conditions, slope stability, and especially slopeangle have all been evaluated in <strong>the</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> soil erosionpotential .A more comprehensive discussion <strong>of</strong> erodibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>soils <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Summit</strong> area may be found on pages 50 - 51 .The soils and miscellaneous land units have been grouped int<strong>of</strong>our classes <strong>of</strong> damage susceptibility described in Table B .DiscussionThe rating can be used to aid <strong>the</strong> planning <strong>of</strong> recreationaldevelopment because it indicates <strong>the</strong> relative durability <strong>of</strong> vegetationand soils .It is not directed to specific uses such as campgrounds andpicnic areas, but <strong>the</strong> ordering <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> units for <strong>the</strong>se uses would likelybe <strong>the</strong> same as for random trampling .The basic application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rating system isto minimizedamage by avoiding use <strong>of</strong> areas at<strong>the</strong> fragile end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale andchanneling intensive traffic through <strong>the</strong> most resilient areas .However,planning decisions cannot be made that easily .Some vegetation fragilityclasses at <strong>the</strong> more resistant end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale coincide with fragilesoil classes .In <strong>the</strong> derivation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fragility classes, no accounthas been taken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rarity <strong>of</strong> vegetation types .For example, vegetationclass 4 includes Cassiope mertensiana stands which, although hardier, areless extensive than <strong>the</strong> mixed herbaceous meadows in vegetation class 5or <strong>the</strong> stands <strong>of</strong> Vaccinium membranaceum beneath sub-alpine fir in vegetationclass 6 .Value judgments <strong>the</strong>refore have to be made and it may be moredesirable to sacrifice part <strong>of</strong> an extensive though fragile vegetation type

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!