Detailed Soil Survey of the Mount Revelstoke Summit Area.
Detailed Soil Survey of the Mount Revelstoke Summit Area. Detailed Soil Survey of the Mount Revelstoke Summit Area.
TABLE B. CLASSES OF FRAGILITY FOR SOILS AND MISCELLANEOUS LAND UNITS, MOUNT REVELSTOKE SUMMIT AREA .Class Definition and Attributes of Class Soil Units0 No susceptibility to damage . This rating is applied to non-soil R (bedrock)areas such as bedrock exposures and coarse colluvial (talus) T (talus)deposits .1 Moderate susceptibility to damage . Soils, in this class are 1/E, 8/C, 8/Emoderately susceptible to erosion . These are well-drainedsoils on slopes of less than 15 percent gradient .2 High susceptibility to damage . Soils in this class are highly 4/C, 6/B, 6/C, 3/Cerodible or susceptible to disturbance by trampling. Well- and all map units ondrained soils on 15 to 60 percent slopes and poorly-drained soils F to G slopeswith silty surface textures or organic layers on slopes of less except 4/F and 5/Fthan 5 percent are included in this class . Erosion preventivemeasures are definitely required if the vegetation cover isremoved from the steeply sloping soils .3 Very high susceptibility to damage . Soils in this class are very 4/D, 4/E, 4/F, 5/Fhighly erodible and may also be susceptible to disturbance byand all map units ontrampling . Well-drained soils on slopes greater than 60 percent H slopes except R/Hgradient and poorly-drained soils on 5 to 30 percent slopes areincluded in this class . These soils should not be used for sitedevelopment if any alternatives are possible . There is a definiterisk that erosion preventive practices would not be successful .
following removal of vegetation .Soil properties such as texture,organic matter content, bulk density, infiltration and percolationrates, drainage conditions, slope stability, and especially slopeangle have all been evaluated in the estimation of soil erosionpotential .A more comprehensive discussion of erodibility of thesoils of the Summit area may be found on pages 50 - 51 .The soils and miscellaneous land units have been grouped intofour classes of damage susceptibility described in Table B .DiscussionThe rating can be used to aid the planning of recreationaldevelopment because it indicates the relative durability of vegetationand soils .It is not directed to specific uses such as campgrounds andpicnic areas, but the ordering of the units for these uses would likelybe the same as for random trampling .The basic application of the rating system isto minimizedamage by avoiding use of areas atthe fragile end of the scale andchanneling intensive traffic through the most resilient areas .However,planning decisions cannot be made that easily .Some vegetation fragilityclasses at the more resistant end of the scale coincide with fragilesoil classes .In the derivation of the fragility classes, no accounthas been taken of the rarity of vegetation types .For example, vegetationclass 4 includes Cassiope mertensiana stands which, although hardier, areless extensive than the mixed herbaceous meadows in vegetation class 5or the stands of Vaccinium membranaceum beneath sub-alpine fir in vegetationclass 6 .Value judgments therefore have to be made and it may be moredesirable to sacrifice part of an extensive though fragile vegetation type
- Page 20 and 21: 13FIGURE 2 .DIAGRAM OF A SOIL PROFI
- Page 22 and 23: 15Soils of the Summit AreaThe soils
- Page 24 and 25: MISCELLANEOUS MAPPING UNITSRBedrock
- Page 26 and 27: AhBhf20 cm-Plate l .The Humo-Ferric
- Page 28 and 29: 21extremely sloping land surfaces o
- Page 30 and 31: Soil Map Unit 3(Orthic and Cumulic
- Page 32 and 33: 25These soils have severe limitatio
- Page 34 and 35: 27Horizon Depth (cm) Color Texture
- Page 36 and 37: 295-a20 cm-5 -bPlate 5 .The hummock
- Page 38 and 39: 31stands are made up of Abies lasio
- Page 40 and 41: 6-aAeBfR20 cm-6 -bPlate 6 .The Lith
- Page 42 and 43: 37INTERPRETATIONSSoil Properties an
- Page 44 and 45: 39TABLE 4,GUIDES FOR ASSESSING SOIL
- Page 46 and 47: 41TABLE 6 .GUIDES FOR ASSESSING SOI
- Page 48 and 49: 43TABLE 8 .GUIDES FOR ASSESSING SOI
- Page 50 and 51: 45especially where bedrock is close
- Page 52 and 53: TABLE 10 . DEGREE AND NATURE OF SOI
- Page 54 and 55: 49The soils of map units 1, 8 and 9
- Page 56 and 57: 51compounds thus inhibiting percola
- Page 58 and 59: 53PRODUCTIVITYProductivity ratings
- Page 60 and 61: S4 XTABLE 11 . DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL
- Page 62 and 63: 57BIBLIOGRAPHYAlberta Department of
- Page 64 and 65: 59Terzaghi, K . and R .B . Peck . 1
- Page 66 and 67: 61ecosystem .While the activities i
- Page 68 and 69: TABLE A. CLASSES OF FRAGILITY FOR P
- Page 72 and 73: 67than to channel use to a rarer ty
- Page 74 and 75: 69approximately 10 cm thickness and
- Page 76 and 77: 71ANALYTICAL DATA 1HorizonDepthcmCa
- Page 78 and 79: 73several species of common occurre
- Page 80 and 81: 75Soil Map Unit 3The imperfectly to
- Page 82 and 83: 77Soil Classification :Orthic Regos
- Page 84 and 85: 79ANALYTICAL DATA 3BHorizonDepthcmC
- Page 86 and 87: 81Elevation : 6,000 ft . ASL (1,830
- Page 88 and 89: 82ANALYTICAL DATA 4HorizonDepthcmCa
- Page 90 and 91: Aspect :southeastElevation : 6,200
- Page 92 and 93: Soil Map Unit 6Hummocky microrelief
- Page 94 and 95: ANALYTICAL DATA 6HorizonDepthcmCaC1
- Page 96 and 97: Location : S-7Parent Material :glac
- Page 98 and 99: Soil Map Unit 8These soils have med
- Page 100 and 101: Elevation : 6,250 ft . ASL (1,910 m
- Page 102 and 103: orizonPyrophosphate96ANALYTICAL DAT
- Page 104 and 105: Slope : 5%Aspect :northElevation :
- Page 106 and 107: Soil Map Unit 10Map Unit 10 soils h
- Page 108 and 109: Vegetation : Abies lasiocarpa (shru
- Page 110 and 111: 104ANALYTTCAL DATAlOBHorizonDepthcm
- Page 112 and 113: A further separation of sands is ma
- Page 114 and 115: (D1) Rapidly drained - soil moistur
- Page 116 and 117: 110TABLE 13 . UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFI
- Page 118 and 119: GLOSSARYThis is included to define
following removal <strong>of</strong> vegetation .<strong>Soil</strong> properties such as texture,organic matter content, bulk density, infiltration and percolationrates, drainage conditions, slope stability, and especially slopeangle have all been evaluated in <strong>the</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> soil erosionpotential .A more comprehensive discussion <strong>of</strong> erodibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>soils <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Summit</strong> area may be found on pages 50 - 51 .The soils and miscellaneous land units have been grouped int<strong>of</strong>our classes <strong>of</strong> damage susceptibility described in Table B .DiscussionThe rating can be used to aid <strong>the</strong> planning <strong>of</strong> recreationaldevelopment because it indicates <strong>the</strong> relative durability <strong>of</strong> vegetationand soils .It is not directed to specific uses such as campgrounds andpicnic areas, but <strong>the</strong> ordering <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> units for <strong>the</strong>se uses would likelybe <strong>the</strong> same as for random trampling .The basic application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rating system isto minimizedamage by avoiding use <strong>of</strong> areas at<strong>the</strong> fragile end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale andchanneling intensive traffic through <strong>the</strong> most resilient areas .However,planning decisions cannot be made that easily .Some vegetation fragilityclasses at <strong>the</strong> more resistant end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale coincide with fragilesoil classes .In <strong>the</strong> derivation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fragility classes, no accounthas been taken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rarity <strong>of</strong> vegetation types .For example, vegetationclass 4 includes Cassiope mertensiana stands which, although hardier, areless extensive than <strong>the</strong> mixed herbaceous meadows in vegetation class 5or <strong>the</strong> stands <strong>of</strong> Vaccinium membranaceum beneath sub-alpine fir in vegetationclass 6 .Value judgments <strong>the</strong>refore have to be made and it may be moredesirable to sacrifice part <strong>of</strong> an extensive though fragile vegetation type