Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
hedgerow. The development will extend built form in a westerly direction but as the land rises in<br />
this direction there will be a degree of planting which would act as a backcloth to the new<br />
building. The levels of the land in this particular area would result in the buildings not appearing<br />
overly obtrusive in the landscape. In terms of long distant views the site would be visible from the<br />
south from the Shortwood area and above but due to the existing large scale buildings on the<br />
school site, the college site and The Lawn site would not detract from the character of the built<br />
form when viewed from this direction. Naturally, there will be a change in the landscape<br />
character of the area but this will be managed and further planting will be introduced to help<br />
minimize the impact of features such as parked vehicles. The new stadium will incorporate new<br />
lighting which will enable light to be directed to specific points of the site and as such will reduce<br />
the amount of light intrusion from floodlights from the present situation experienced at The Lawn.<br />
The newly proposed extension to the King George V playing field will enable land to be utilized<br />
for recreational use and the landscape has already been significantly altered in this location due<br />
to the previous activities of the site. The area will not have any lighting and therefore the issue of<br />
light pollution is not relevant. The scheme involves cut and fill operations to provide a level site<br />
and existing landscape features are to be retained where possible. It is proposed to place<br />
conditions on any permission which require further landscaping and works which will protect the<br />
existing features of value on this area of land.<br />
In view of the above it is considered the development is not at variance with Policies N6 and N8<br />
of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />
Affect on residential amenity<br />
In respect of Policy G1 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended<br />
June 2001) it is a requirement to consider the effect any development will have on the residential<br />
amenities of occupiers of near by properties. The proposal involves both an access and new<br />
buildings which will be visible from North Farm and Bramble Cottage on the Nympsfield Road in<br />
particular. In order to assess the effect the development will have on the occupiers of these<br />
properties the applicant has been requested to provide information in respect of noise, day<br />
lighting (including a shadow study), and light intrusion from the stadium. The effect the<br />
development will have is summarized as having an effect in terms of noise but this will be for<br />
limited periods of time and not normally late into the night / early hours of the morning. Noise<br />
would also occur in respect of traffic leaving and entering the site. Match day reports suggest<br />
that this would approach a statutory noise situation (albeit for short periods) but it is difficult to<br />
consider the situation solely in these terms. Rather it is suggested the noise aspect be<br />
considered in the context of the loss and some gain in amenity terms when all aspects are<br />
considered. In terms of public interest there is likely to be a gain in amenity terms rather than a<br />
loss. Other legislation exists to deal with noise issues, should they arise, and a balance has to<br />
be struck between the affects of the development against its positive benefits overall in amenity<br />
terms.<br />
The lighting report and plans show the nearest properties will be little affected by the<br />
development and this is not therefore considered to be an issue which would warrant refusal of<br />
permission.<br />
In relation to shadowing the applicant has provided evidence which supports the view the<br />
development will not adversely affect light to the residential dwellings and at times one is in<br />
shadow already due to its proximity to the land to the west of the site which is on a higher level.<br />
In these respects the development accords with Policy G1 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan<br />
Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />
Car Parking<br />
79