01.12.2012 Views

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />

hedgerow. The development will extend built form in a westerly direction but as the land rises in<br />

this direction there will be a degree of planting which would act as a backcloth to the new<br />

building. The levels of the land in this particular area would result in the buildings not appearing<br />

overly obtrusive in the landscape. In terms of long distant views the site would be visible from the<br />

south from the Shortwood area and above but due to the existing large scale buildings on the<br />

school site, the college site and The Lawn site would not detract from the character of the built<br />

form when viewed from this direction. Naturally, there will be a change in the landscape<br />

character of the area but this will be managed and further planting will be introduced to help<br />

minimize the impact of features such as parked vehicles. The new stadium will incorporate new<br />

lighting which will enable light to be directed to specific points of the site and as such will reduce<br />

the amount of light intrusion from floodlights from the present situation experienced at The Lawn.<br />

The newly proposed extension to the King George V playing field will enable land to be utilized<br />

for recreational use and the landscape has already been significantly altered in this location due<br />

to the previous activities of the site. The area will not have any lighting and therefore the issue of<br />

light pollution is not relevant. The scheme involves cut and fill operations to provide a level site<br />

and existing landscape features are to be retained where possible. It is proposed to place<br />

conditions on any permission which require further landscaping and works which will protect the<br />

existing features of value on this area of land.<br />

In view of the above it is considered the development is not at variance with Policies N6 and N8<br />

of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />

Affect on residential amenity<br />

In respect of Policy G1 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended<br />

June 2001) it is a requirement to consider the effect any development will have on the residential<br />

amenities of occupiers of near by properties. The proposal involves both an access and new<br />

buildings which will be visible from North Farm and Bramble Cottage on the Nympsfield Road in<br />

particular. In order to assess the effect the development will have on the occupiers of these<br />

properties the applicant has been requested to provide information in respect of noise, day<br />

lighting (including a shadow study), and light intrusion from the stadium. The effect the<br />

development will have is summarized as having an effect in terms of noise but this will be for<br />

limited periods of time and not normally late into the night / early hours of the morning. Noise<br />

would also occur in respect of traffic leaving and entering the site. Match day reports suggest<br />

that this would approach a statutory noise situation (albeit for short periods) but it is difficult to<br />

consider the situation solely in these terms. Rather it is suggested the noise aspect be<br />

considered in the context of the loss and some gain in amenity terms when all aspects are<br />

considered. In terms of public interest there is likely to be a gain in amenity terms rather than a<br />

loss. Other legislation exists to deal with noise issues, should they arise, and a balance has to<br />

be struck between the affects of the development against its positive benefits overall in amenity<br />

terms.<br />

The lighting report and plans show the nearest properties will be little affected by the<br />

development and this is not therefore considered to be an issue which would warrant refusal of<br />

permission.<br />

In relation to shadowing the applicant has provided evidence which supports the view the<br />

development will not adversely affect light to the residential dwellings and at times one is in<br />

shadow already due to its proximity to the land to the west of the site which is on a higher level.<br />

In these respects the development accords with Policy G1 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan<br />

Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />

Car Parking<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!