Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 for at least the first 5.0m from the carriageway edge and maintained as such thereafter. Reason: To prevent loose material being carried onto the highway in the interests of highway safety. 8) Before the development hereby permitted is commenced, a scheme of surface water disposal from the driveways shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Head of Development Services. The approved scheme shall then be implemented in full prior to the first occupation of the development. Reason: To ensure that surface water does not discharge onto the highway in the interests of highway safety. 9) Notwithstanding the submitted plans, the development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until details of a 1.5m wide footway along the site frontage parallel to the dwellings, which is suitable for adoption as a public highway have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Head of Development Services. The approved scheme shall then be implemented in full prior to the first occupation of any residential unit and maintained as such thereafter. Reason: In the interests of highway safety. 10) Notwithstanding the submitted drawing, the development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until details of a scheme to reduce the boundary walling / fencing to a height no greater than 1.0m above the adjacent carriageway level within the control of the applicant adjacent to Churchfield Road, have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Head of Development Services. The approved scheme shall then be implemented in full prior to the first occupation of the development and maintained as such thereafter. Informatives: Reason: In the interests of highway safety. 1) For the purposes of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) (England) (Amendment) Order 2003, the following reasons for the Council's decision are summarised below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision: The proposal represents an acceptable form of infill residential development located within the defined settlement boundary. The design and scale of the proposed units are in keeping with the character and appearance of the surrounding built form with the units having suitable levels of amenity space. In light of the authorised use of the site as a builders yard, the overall impact on highway safety and the surrounding road network is acceptable with conditions imposed regarding further highway improvements. In this manner the scheme accords with Policies H14 and G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). 2) 1 Vehicular crossing over highway land 6
Materials: Roof Conc int tiles Walls Brick Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Constraints: Environment Agency consulted Severn Trent Water consulted Consultations/Representations: Parish Response: Stroud Town Council objects to the application. Highway - They are very concerned at Highway implications for 4 new houses on what is an unmade road, very narrow onto another very narrow road (Spider Lane). Concerns therefore on pedestrian safety, visibility for vehicles, lack of parking and turning space. Also loss of garage/parking space for existing premises. Where will these existing cars be parked in the future? Design - Very poor, cheap design. Totally out of keeping with surrounding area, Horns Road, Churchfield Road, Lower Churchfield Road and adjoining Hope Cottages. Although they are small buildings, they are well designed using traditional features and materials. If SDC officers are recommending consent, Stroud Town Council will call for a sites panel. Amenity Space - Proposal will remove all of rear garden for Rockfield and 3 buildings off Churchfield Road have minuscule gardens. Probably do not meet SDC garden space criteria. Revised plans do not alter situation Town Council reiterate previous objections. Revised Consultation: Stroud Town Council still object for the above reasons and also state: Blocking off vehicular access from Bowbridge Lane will cause unacceptable congestion, hardship and danger. The flow of traffic will be completely aggravated by these proposals. Access on the approach from Bowbridge Lane must be retained for safety reasons i.e. emergency services. Question legality of this application, are there any civil law problems e.g. right of way for pedestrians and vehicles. Further revisions - reiterate previous objections. 09.06.04 - Stroud Town Council object see above reasons. Highways Authority: Raise no objection to the proposal subject to the imposition of conditions regarding the provision of a turning area, pedestrian service strip and car parking. Other Consultations: Seven Trent Water Authority: Raise no objection to the proposal. 7
Page 1 and 2: Stroud District Council SCHEDULE OF
Page 3 and 4: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 5: ITEM No: 01 Application: S.01/436 P
Page 11 and 12: Relevant Planning History Planning
Page 13 and 14: ITEM No: 02 Application: S.03/1451
Page 19 and 20: POLICY B9 Planning Schedule Date: 1
Page 21 and 22: Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 33 and 34: Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 41 and 42: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 57 and 58:
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 59 and 60:
Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
Page 101 and 102:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Planning Considerations Planning Sc
Page 111 and 112:
Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Site Report: The site and the propo
Page 131 and 132:
Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Consultations/Representations: Neig
Page 137 and 138:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Site No: Parish: Recommendation Pla
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Recommendation Permission Planning
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 181 and 182:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Site No: Parish: Applicant Details:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Date Received: Planning Schedule Da
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
show all

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?