01.12.2012 Views

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />

The Police Authority have been consulted and they are concerned regarding the size of the<br />

roundabout proposed at the entrance to the stadium but defer matters relating to highway safety<br />

to the Highway Authority.<br />

They wish to see the development accord with the principles of 'secured by design' and have<br />

some concern regarding the location of parking spaces 97 - 1<strong>10</strong> as they will not be open to<br />

natural surveillance. Any landscaping proposals may reduce the amount of natural surveillance<br />

available to the site.<br />

They wish to see the area with lighting and would wish to comment further on the accessing<br />

arrangements for persons entering and leaving the stadium. They have been in consultation with<br />

the club. Fencing is indicated on the boundaries and this will prevent indiscriminate parking.<br />

They query areas where arrested people on match days can be detained and query the final<br />

specification for alarms on the building and the nature of any bars, gym and offices.<br />

In respect of the proposal to extend the ground at King George V site it is recommended some<br />

traffic calming be introduced to the roads serving the site.<br />

Severn Trent<br />

Severn Trent Water raises no objections subject to conditions relating to drainage works being<br />

undertaken to reduce the risk of flooding.<br />

Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust<br />

The Trust is in receipt of both the original application and the subsequent additional information.<br />

They confirm that a sufficient ecological assessment has been carried out for the site and that the<br />

relevant areas of concern have been identified. They are also of the view that the proposed<br />

mitigation measures for wildlife are appropriate and will ensure that the proposed development<br />

does not result in any significant adverse effects on species.<br />

Garden History Society<br />

The Garden History Society which comments on proposals which may affect a registered Park or<br />

Garden (Woodchester Park in this instance) has no comments to make.<br />

English Nature<br />

English Nature confirm the site is within 0.5km of Woodchester Park SSSI which is important for<br />

its populations of Bats. The Environmental Statement recognises this importance and has<br />

suggested valid mitigation measures to ensure the foraging routes of the Bats are not<br />

significantly affected in the wider area around Woodchester Park.<br />

English Heritage<br />

English Heritage considers this to be a case which can be determined by the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in<br />

accordance with Government Guidance, Development Plan policies and Conservation advice<br />

locally. They do not wish to make any representations.<br />

Countryside Agency<br />

The Countryside Agency has decided not to make any formal representations on this application.<br />

County Surveyor (Rich Gray)<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!