Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
The Police Authority have been consulted and they are concerned regarding the size of the<br />
roundabout proposed at the entrance to the stadium but defer matters relating to highway safety<br />
to the Highway Authority.<br />
They wish to see the development accord with the principles of 'secured by design' and have<br />
some concern regarding the location of parking spaces 97 - 1<strong>10</strong> as they will not be open to<br />
natural surveillance. Any landscaping proposals may reduce the amount of natural surveillance<br />
available to the site.<br />
They wish to see the area with lighting and would wish to comment further on the accessing<br />
arrangements for persons entering and leaving the stadium. They have been in consultation with<br />
the club. Fencing is indicated on the boundaries and this will prevent indiscriminate parking.<br />
They query areas where arrested people on match days can be detained and query the final<br />
specification for alarms on the building and the nature of any bars, gym and offices.<br />
In respect of the proposal to extend the ground at King George V site it is recommended some<br />
traffic calming be introduced to the roads serving the site.<br />
Severn Trent<br />
Severn Trent Water raises no objections subject to conditions relating to drainage works being<br />
undertaken to reduce the risk of flooding.<br />
Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust<br />
The Trust is in receipt of both the original application and the subsequent additional information.<br />
They confirm that a sufficient ecological assessment has been carried out for the site and that the<br />
relevant areas of concern have been identified. They are also of the view that the proposed<br />
mitigation measures for wildlife are appropriate and will ensure that the proposed development<br />
does not result in any significant adverse effects on species.<br />
Garden History Society<br />
The Garden History Society which comments on proposals which may affect a registered Park or<br />
Garden (Woodchester Park in this instance) has no comments to make.<br />
English Nature<br />
English Nature confirm the site is within 0.5km of Woodchester Park SSSI which is important for<br />
its populations of Bats. The Environmental Statement recognises this importance and has<br />
suggested valid mitigation measures to ensure the foraging routes of the Bats are not<br />
significantly affected in the wider area around Woodchester Park.<br />
English Heritage<br />
English Heritage considers this to be a case which can be determined by the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in<br />
accordance with Government Guidance, Development Plan policies and Conservation advice<br />
locally. They do not wish to make any representations.<br />
Countryside Agency<br />
The Countryside Agency has decided not to make any formal representations on this application.<br />
County Surveyor (Rich Gray)<br />
60