Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Development: Applicant Details: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date Received: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Removal of Condition 6 attached to permission ref.S.02/826 for erection of dwelling (Requiring improvements to visibility at the junction of Chapel Lane and Tetbury Street) Mr. & Mrs.N.Gooch Waldeck, Chapel Lane, Minchinhampton, Stroud, Glos, GL6 9DL Mr Philip Hodges Tetbury Upton, Tetbury, Gloucestershire, GL8 8LP Eleanor Jackson 06.04.2004 Recommendation Refusal Consultations/Representations: Parish / Town For the following reasons: 1. Condition 6 of planning permission S.02/826 requires improvements to be made to the sub-standard junction of Chapel Lane and Tetbury Street. The applicant has not submitted sufficient information to prove that these junction improvements are not necessary and therefore, the removal of Condition 6 would be detrimental to highway safety and contrary to Policy G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). Support: The proposals arose from a Planning Inspector's decision, and councillors commented that there was no need to realign the pavement, already wide at this point, or introduce measures that would require signage and lighting. There was a proposal already to introduce parking on the south side of the street that would have a calming effect. The Council suggest that the junction be left as it is, and that the Inspector has imposed an unnecessary condition upon the appellants. County Surveyor (Initial) Recommend refusal on grounds that removal of condition would result in development that would increase use of sub-standard junction which, in the absence of satisfactory improvement, would be likely to increase dangers and hazards to other road users. Neighbour Contributions Letters of Objection Occupiers, Bubblewell Cottage, Chapel Lane Mr & Mrs Wilkins, Chapel Farm, Chapel Lane C Norris, Field House, Chapel Lane 46
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 • Condition should not be removed. • Junction of Chapel Lane and Tetbury Street is dangerous, any measure to improve visibility for vehicles is welcomed. • Condition 6 should not be removed. Letters of Support Mrs V Boyce, The Old Barn, Chapel Lane Peter Farley, The Old Chapel, Chapel Lane M Hart (Eggleton), Dove Barn, Chapel Lane Dr R W Lamb, Chapel Lane Cottage, Chapel Lane Mr & Mrs Palmer, Inglestone, Chapel Lane Mrs A Weller, 16 Tetbury Street, Minchinhampton • Support; any change in present is unnecessary. • Volume of traffic from Chapel Lane has always been low. Junction of Chapel Lane and Tetbury Street should be left as it is. • One new dwelling will not affect / increase the existing safety risks. • Will not help the situation. • No history of accidents in that area. • Traffic in Chapel Lane is not unduly heavy and exit to Tetbury Street not particularly hazardous although probably does not conform to current standards. • The site is considered ideal for this purpose • This condition is considered nonsense when this area is riddled with quirky hazards that are well known and regarded. 47
Page 1 and 2: Stroud District Council SCHEDULE OF
Page 3 and 4: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 5 and 6: ITEM No: 01 Application: S.01/436 P
Page 7 and 8: Materials: Roof Conc int tiles Wall
Page 11 and 12: Relevant Planning History Planning
Page 13 and 14: ITEM No: 02 Application: S.03/1451
Page 19 and 20: POLICY B9 Planning Schedule Date: 1
Page 21 and 22: Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 33 and 34: Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 41 and 42: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 45: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 97 and 98:
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 99 and 100:
ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
Page 101 and 102:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Planning Considerations Planning Sc
Page 111 and 112:
Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
Page 113 and 114:
Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Site Report: The site and the propo
Page 131 and 132:
Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Consultations/Representations: Neig
Page 137 and 138:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Site No: Parish: Recommendation Pla
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Recommendation Permission Planning
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 181 and 182:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Site No: Parish: Applicant Details:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Date Received: Planning Schedule Da
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
show all

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?