01.12.2012 Views

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Development:<br />

Applicant Details:<br />

Agent Details:<br />

Case Officer:<br />

<strong>Date</strong> Received:<br />

<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />

Removal of Condition 6 attached to permission ref.S.02/826 for<br />

erection of dwelling (Requiring improvements to visibility at the junction<br />

of Chapel Lane and Tetbury Street)<br />

Mr. & Mrs.N.Gooch<br />

Waldeck, Chapel Lane, Minchinhampton, <strong>Stroud</strong>, Glos, GL6 9DL<br />

Mr Philip Hodges<br />

Tetbury Upton, Tetbury, Gloucestershire, GL8 8LP<br />

Eleanor Jackson<br />

06.04.<strong>2004</strong><br />

Recommendation Refusal<br />

Consultations/Representations:<br />

Parish / Town<br />

For the following reasons:<br />

1. Condition 6 of planning permission S.02/826 requires improvements to<br />

be made to the sub-standard junction of Chapel Lane and Tetbury Street.<br />

The applicant has not submitted sufficient information to prove that these<br />

junction improvements are not necessary and therefore, the removal of<br />

Condition 6 would be detrimental to highway safety and contrary to Policy<br />

G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as<br />

amended June 2001).<br />

Support:<br />

The proposals arose from a <strong>Planning</strong> Inspector's decision, and councillors commented that there<br />

was no need to realign the pavement, already wide at this point, or introduce measures that<br />

would require signage and lighting. There was a proposal already to introduce parking on the<br />

south side of the street that would have a calming effect. The <strong>Council</strong> suggest that the junction<br />

be left as it is, and that the Inspector has imposed an unnecessary condition upon the appellants.<br />

County Surveyor (Initial)<br />

Recommend refusal on grounds that removal of condition would result in development that would<br />

increase use of sub-standard junction which, in the absence of satisfactory improvement, would<br />

be likely to increase dangers and hazards to other road users.<br />

Neighbour Contributions<br />

Letters of Objection<br />

Occupiers, Bubblewell Cottage, Chapel Lane<br />

Mr & Mrs Wilkins, Chapel Farm, Chapel Lane<br />

C Norris, Field House, Chapel Lane<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!