Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Development:<br />
Applicant Details:<br />
Agent Details:<br />
Case Officer:<br />
<strong>Date</strong> Received:<br />
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
Removal of Condition 6 attached to permission ref.S.02/826 for<br />
erection of dwelling (Requiring improvements to visibility at the junction<br />
of Chapel Lane and Tetbury Street)<br />
Mr. & Mrs.N.Gooch<br />
Waldeck, Chapel Lane, Minchinhampton, <strong>Stroud</strong>, Glos, GL6 9DL<br />
Mr Philip Hodges<br />
Tetbury Upton, Tetbury, Gloucestershire, GL8 8LP<br />
Eleanor Jackson<br />
06.04.<strong>2004</strong><br />
Recommendation Refusal<br />
Consultations/Representations:<br />
Parish / Town<br />
For the following reasons:<br />
1. Condition 6 of planning permission S.02/826 requires improvements to<br />
be made to the sub-standard junction of Chapel Lane and Tetbury Street.<br />
The applicant has not submitted sufficient information to prove that these<br />
junction improvements are not necessary and therefore, the removal of<br />
Condition 6 would be detrimental to highway safety and contrary to Policy<br />
G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as<br />
amended June 2001).<br />
Support:<br />
The proposals arose from a <strong>Planning</strong> Inspector's decision, and councillors commented that there<br />
was no need to realign the pavement, already wide at this point, or introduce measures that<br />
would require signage and lighting. There was a proposal already to introduce parking on the<br />
south side of the street that would have a calming effect. The <strong>Council</strong> suggest that the junction<br />
be left as it is, and that the Inspector has imposed an unnecessary condition upon the appellants.<br />
County Surveyor (Initial)<br />
Recommend refusal on grounds that removal of condition would result in development that would<br />
increase use of sub-standard junction which, in the absence of satisfactory improvement, would<br />
be likely to increase dangers and hazards to other road users.<br />
Neighbour Contributions<br />
Letters of Objection<br />
Occupiers, Bubblewell Cottage, Chapel Lane<br />
Mr & Mrs Wilkins, Chapel Farm, Chapel Lane<br />
C Norris, Field House, Chapel Lane<br />
46