Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
On the issue of affordable housing: 26 units in total are proposed, 30% of which is 7.8 units. The<br />
development includes 8 affordable units of various sizes and designs, a legal agreement will be<br />
required to ensure that this provision is retained in the longer term. The proposal is in<br />
accordance with Policies H8 and H9.<br />
It is recommended to Resolve not to Refuse the application subject to a legal agreement to retain<br />
the affordable housing and provide a maintenance contribution for the public open space.<br />
Sites Inspection Panel<br />
The Panel walked along the existing housing frontages noting their design, aspect and siting. The<br />
existing equipped play area close to the application site was evident. The public footpath running<br />
south west from the application site was also highlighted. The Panel proceeded by walking onto<br />
both elements of the application site.<br />
The Parish <strong>Council</strong> representative reiterated their objection. The scheme was felt to be too<br />
dense, and 22 houses would be more appropriate for this context. It was suggested that a<br />
through footpath should be created to avoid a cul-de-sac giving better community cohesion and<br />
security. Concern was also expressed about the likely volume of traffic. The ward Member, Cllr.<br />
Le Fleming sympathised with the Parish <strong>Council</strong> comments on density especially in relation to<br />
plots 9-15, which appear to have been squashed in. He was also concerned about the recreation<br />
space, and felt that there should be better provision for youth recreation in accordance with policy<br />
R5. The Parish <strong>Council</strong>lor confirmed that the village playing field is 400-500 yards away. The<br />
County Highways Officer could not attend, but is not objecting to the application.<br />
One Member of the Panel questioned whether the design was highway led and the resulting<br />
implications for pedestrians as well as the streetscene. Another Member felt that the number of<br />
houses could lead to excessive traffic and questioned the play facilities. The majority of the Panel<br />
were generally favourable towards the scheme.<br />
In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human<br />
Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected<br />
properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for<br />
private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this<br />
Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application<br />
no particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to<br />
that recommended.<br />
ITEM No: 09<br />
Application<br />
Site Address:<br />
Site No:<br />
Parish:<br />
S.04/0722/VAR<br />
Grid Reference: 387272,200546<br />
Application Type:<br />
Waldeck, Chapel Lane, Minchinhampton, <strong>Stroud</strong><br />
2<strong>10</strong>45<br />
Minchinhampton Parish <strong>Council</strong><br />
Variation of Condition<br />
45