Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 the estate and will inevitably lead to a ghetto environment with associated levels in dirt and unsociable activities. • Density of houses. • Sewerage and drainage not suitable. • Too many houses. • Loss of light. • Loss of privacy. • Not in character with the area. • Existing roads will not cope with the increase in traffic. • No provision for youngsters to play with the loss of this 'field'. • Electricity supply - Aquila 'H' post on writers land which is the main feed to Windyridge, supply route is in poor condition. • Cannot be Approval of Reserved Matters as the criteria has been exhausted. • Urbanised estate in a scenic Cotswold village. • Parking congestion. • Air pollution. • Noise pollution. • Pressure on services - flooding could occur. • Lack of facilities - especially for young people. • Design lacks originality. • Lack of space within the houses. • Out of keeping with surrounding houses. • Lack of landscaping, very small gardens. • Unattractive parking lot. • Intended tree planting will present a loss of light. • Revised plans: Numbers still too high. Scale is inappropriate in the village. No more than 12 houses should be permitted. • No information on the houses that are going to be housing association. • Contrary to the principles laid out in the Stroud District Local Plan. • Revised plans: transport problems with additional dwellings and detrimental to character of village. • Deeply opposed to 'Leicester' design, height will cause loss of light and privacy • Revised plans: Village will lose its unique identity. • Given reasons for rejecting a recent environmentally friendly small business less than a mile away it would be hypocritical to approve this in its current form • Access onto Cheltenham Road is totally unsuitable. Should consider 2 cul-de-sacs off Stroud Road. • Too many houses are proposed for the site • Three storey houses are inappropriate. • POS/ Play is not large enough • Lack of access to public footpath which leads via Bearsfield to the village amenities. • Possible to remove some of these objections via deletion of plots 22, 23 & 24. • Loss of children’s play area. 40
Site Location: Site Report: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Site and Proposal The site is located within the village of Bisley, approximately 100 metres to the north west of the designated Conservation Area and in the Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. It is split into two different areas the larger being currently a flat field that is used informally for recreational purposes and is surrounded on all sides by the rear gardens of two storey residential properties. On the north western boundary of the site is a 1.8 metre high close boarded fence. There are various hedges and fences on the other boundaries, varying in height depending on residents choice. There is a public footpath running across the eastern corner of the site and another in from the Stroud Road to the south west. The smaller area has low bungalows to the south, two storey dwellings to the north east and allotments to the north west. There is a band of low shrubby vegetation along the north west boundary and 1 metre chain link fencing to the south east. The proposal is for the approval of reserved matters, following outline approval S.01/355, for 26 dwellings of which 8 are affordable units. Relevant History Application S.01/355 for "Renewal of outline permission S.98/176 for residential development" was approved on 18/4/2001. 41
Page 1 and 2: Stroud District Council SCHEDULE OF
Page 3 and 4: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 5 and 6: ITEM No: 01 Application: S.01/436 P
Page 7 and 8: Materials: Roof Conc int tiles Wall
Page 11 and 12: Relevant Planning History Planning
Page 13 and 14: ITEM No: 02 Application: S.03/1451
Page 19 and 20: POLICY B9 Planning Schedule Date: 1
Page 21 and 22: Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 33 and 34: Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 39: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 91 and 92:
Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 93 and 94:
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
Page 101 and 102:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Planning Considerations Planning Sc
Page 111 and 112:
Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Site Report: The site and the propo
Page 131 and 132:
Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Consultations/Representations: Neig
Page 137 and 138:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Site No: Parish: Recommendation Pla
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Recommendation Permission Planning
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 181 and 182:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Site No: Parish: Applicant Details:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Date Received: Planning Schedule Da
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
show all

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?