Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
similar in scale and appearance to the main dwelling. There are a couple of small outbuildings to<br />
the south of the main house. The property sits on a flat area with the land to the south rising<br />
rapidly and falling to the north. The site is accessed via a very narrow, poorly surfaced road with<br />
a steep access and poor visibility onto the main road.<br />
The proposal is for the erection of "auxiliary accommodation", in accordance with the plans<br />
previously approved applications S.98/286 & S.99/822 which have now lapsed.<br />
Relevant History<br />
Application S.97/267 for "Outline application for the erection of one dwelling" was refused on<br />
16/4/97 and subsequently dismissed at appeal on 3/2/1998 on highway reasons. The inspector<br />
commented at this time that no objection was raised to ancillary accommodation.<br />
Application S.98/286 for "Outline application for the erection of ancillary accommodation to<br />
Hawkswood" was approved on 7/4/1999 with both conditions and a Section <strong>10</strong>6 legal agreement<br />
restricting the use to ancillary to the main dwelling.<br />
Application 99/822 for "Erection of ancillary accommodation to Hawkswood" was substantially<br />
reduced in scale prior to the application being approved on 28/07/1999. This was subsequently<br />
detached from the main property by minor amendment. This application was not implemented<br />
and lapsed on 7/4/<strong>2004</strong> (as agreed in the agents letter received by fax on 8/6/<strong>2004</strong>.)<br />
Application S.99/1882 for "Removal of Condition (4) of Permission S.98/286- Outline application<br />
for the erection of ancillary accommodation to Hawkswood. (Condition (4) states "The ancillary<br />
accommodation hereby permitted shall not be occupied at any time other than as an extension<br />
to, and in connection with the residential use of the dwelling known as Hawkswood".)" was<br />
refused on 2/2/2000.<br />
Application S.02/1791 for "Application to remove Condition 4 of Permission S.98/286 (Ancillary<br />
accommodation to Hawkswood) to permit the ancillary house to be occupied as a separate<br />
dwelling" was withdrawn prior to decision. The agent was informed that the building which has<br />
been constructed on site is not in accordance with any approved development.<br />
Application S.02/2188 for "Retrospective application for the erection of ancillary accommodation<br />
to Hawkswood" was refused on 22/01/2003 and subsequently dismissed on appeal on 7/<strong>10</strong>/2003.<br />
Application S.03/C0479/FUL for "Retrospective application for use of building as auxiliary<br />
accommodation to Hawkswood" was refused.<br />
<strong>Planning</strong> Considerations<br />
The previous application has lapsed and this is therefore not a renewal of a previous permission,<br />
and has to be considered afresh against those policies and factors that are relevant at this point<br />
in time. Since the previous approval there have been a number of significant occurrences:<br />
Policy H24 was introduced to the Local Plan in November 1999, requiring annexes for a<br />
dependent relative to be linked by internal door or doors to the main dwelling and that the<br />
accommodation is readily convertible for use as an extension to the main dwelling;<br />
The applicant has made two separate planning applications to remove the condition requiring<br />
ancillary occupation (showing little intention to use the building for ancillary purposes);<br />
and a new independent dwelling has been constructed but permission has retrospectively been<br />
refused at appeal.<br />
The significant distance of the proposed building from the original dwelling means it cannot be<br />
considered as an annexe to the main property under Policy H24 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan,<br />
Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001) as it is not linked by internal door or doors to<br />
the main house.<br />
30