Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Neighbour Contributions Letters of Objection D J Bull, 3 Windsor Road, Dursley Mr P Evans, 5 Windsor Road, Dursley • Loss of view. • Loss of light. • Previous refusal on site. • Detrimental to objector's property. • Seen revised plans - objections still stand. Site Location: Site Report: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 The application site is located towards the eastern edge of the town of Dursley, and just south of Rednock Secondary School. The site consists of a two storey semi detached property, finished in white rough render. Directly to the east and west of the site are the neighbouring and adjoining properties respectively, with Windsor Road to the south and the rear garden that falls away from the house, to the north. 26
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 The application is made for the erection of a single garage to the side of the property and a single storey extension and conservatory to the rear elevation. Planning History S.03/274 Erection of a two storey extension, conservatory and garage. - Withdrawn S.03/1855 Erection of attached garage and single storey extension. - Refused 21/01/2004 Planning Considerations The relevant policy advice for this application is contained within Policies H23 and G1 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). These policies seek to allow extensions to residential properties subject to a number of criteria. These aim to retain the character of the dwelling to be extended, the amenity of the site and that of neighbouring properties. As can been seen from the planning history there have been previous applications over the last 18 months for similar schemes with the initial application for a two storey extension being withdrawn and the subsequent revised application being refused due to the proposal leading to an unacceptable loss of privacy to a neighbouring property and the design being out of keeping with the host property. The rear extension shown within this application has been significantly reduced both in height and depth with the effect on the adjoining property now being minimal. The orientation has been changed from initially extending in a north to south manner to this application concentrating the built form mainly in an east to west style. The rear extension has also benefited from a revision in that a proposed window to the eastern elevation has been removed to prevent any potential increase in the level of privacy observed by the neighbouring property. This element of the proposal is now in accordance with both Policy G1 and H23 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). The garage element has not changed from the previous application as it had an acceptable height, size and design initially with no issues or loss of privacy. With regard to the comments received from the neighbouring property regarding the potential loss of light to the said property, while the proposal will have an effect on that property the level of loss of light would not be considered to be significantly detrimental. Therefore this application is in accordance with all of the above mentioned policies and the application is duly recommended for conditional permission. SITES INSPECTION PANEL The panel inspected the site and noted the relationship between the existing dwelling and the neighbouring properties. The position of the windows of the adjacent dwelling was noted together with other features such as the size of the garden, the hedge and fence lines and the respective levels of the site in relation to its surroundings. The Parish Council representative reiterated the objections to the development as it would be overwhelming from the point of view of the existing development and the adjoining houses. The Ward Councillor, Mrs Fowles, supported the views of the Town Council and the proposal will adversely affect the neighbouring properties. There would be a loss of privacy if not a loss of light. The design is not sympathetic to the character of the house. After discussion, the Panel were of the view the proposals were acceptable but Officers were also of the opinion further improvements could be made to the scheme and would negotiate further with the applicants agent. 27
Page 1 and 2: Stroud District Council SCHEDULE OF
Page 3 and 4: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 5 and 6: ITEM No: 01 Application: S.01/436 P
Page 7 and 8: Materials: Roof Conc int tiles Wall
Page 11 and 12: Relevant Planning History Planning
Page 13 and 14: ITEM No: 02 Application: S.03/1451
Page 19 and 20: POLICY B9 Planning Schedule Date: 1
Page 21 and 22: Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 25: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 33 and 34: Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 41 and 42: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 77 and 78:
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
Page 101 and 102:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Planning Considerations Planning Sc
Page 111 and 112:
Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Site Report: The site and the propo
Page 131 and 132:
Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Consultations/Representations: Neig
Page 137 and 138:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Site No: Parish: Recommendation Pla
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Recommendation Permission Planning
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 181 and 182:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Site No: Parish: Applicant Details:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Date Received: Planning Schedule Da
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
show all

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?