01.12.2012 Views

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />

The relevant policy advice for this application is contained within Policies G1 and B11 of the<br />

<strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). These policies<br />

seek to allow development within the <strong>District</strong> subject to a number of criteria. These aim to protect<br />

and enhance the setting of the listed building, to which the extension is to be attached, as well as<br />

preserving the amenities of the surrounding properties.<br />

The scheme as originally submitted was initially opposed by officers due to the fact that the siting<br />

and massing of the proposed extension was such that it would have dominated the listed building<br />

on the site and would have had a detrimental effect on the overall street scene. The proposed<br />

materials were also not considered to sufficiently differentiate the two elements of the site (the<br />

extension and the listed building).<br />

Revised plans have now been received which address the issues mentioned, the siting, design<br />

and materials of the proposal have all been altered. Due to the size constraints of the site it is not<br />

possible to make hugely significant adaptations. However the proposal has been altered so that a<br />

larger area is made between the listed building and the extension, this when combined with the<br />

lowering of the ridge height and the fact that the extension has been set back from the highway<br />

frontage, means that the proposal is now considered to have a much reduced impact on the<br />

setting of the listed building and provides an improved street scene.<br />

The proposed extension, as now revised, would clearly have an effect on the setting of the<br />

adjoining listed building however the need for such an extension and the overall benefit from the<br />

proposal would outweigh any negative elements. With the constraints of the site in mind and the<br />

existing situation of the school it is considered that this scheme is the most acceptable outcome<br />

of the site with both Policy G1 and B11 being satisfied.<br />

As this application is one being determined by the County <strong>Council</strong> it is recommended that the<br />

application is returned to the County <strong>Council</strong> with no observations, subject to subsequent<br />

approval of the materials. The accompanying Listed Building application will have to be sent to<br />

the Government Office of the South West for determination.<br />

In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human<br />

Rights Act 1988 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected<br />

properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for<br />

private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this<br />

Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application no<br />

particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to that<br />

recommended.<br />

ITEM No: 37<br />

Application<br />

Site Address:<br />

Site No:<br />

Parish:<br />

S.04/0229/LBC<br />

Haresfield C Of E Primary School, Haresfield Lane, Haresfield,<br />

Stonehouse<br />

11741<br />

Haresfield Parish <strong>Council</strong><br />

Grid Reference: 381489,2<strong>10</strong>249<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!