Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 the layout would have encouraged vehicles to reverse out onto the highway. The proposal was therefore considered contrary to highway safety. The applicant has now resubmitted the application for the access to include visibility splays in both directions. It is understood that whilst this includes land outside his ownership, his neighbours at Cherry Tree House are prepared to accept a covenant on their property to secure a reduction in height of their side boundary wall adjoining the site and the maintenance of the visibility splay in perpetuity. Planning Considerations The proposal is for a new access and must be considered in relation to Policy G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001), which states that permission will not be granted for development that would be likely to be detrimental to the highway safety of any user of any highway or public right of way. The Highway Authority again recommend that the application be refused on highway grounds because the site frontage is too restricted to provide for the required visibility splays necessary to serve the proposed development. In addition, the Highway Authority again consider that the layout of the vehicular access is such that it would encourage vehicles to reverse out of the site onto the adjacent classified road, all to the detriment of highway safety. Therefore, the proposal does not comply with the above Policy. Coaley Parish Council object to the application on the grounds of the poor visibility leaving the site and are concerned that visibility is dependant upon the neighbouring property retaining a low level wall. In summary, the dwelling on this plot was approved on the basis of there being no vehicular access other than through the existing pub car park. This was for highway safety reasons. The applicant has constructed an unauthorised access onto a busy classified road, contrary to Policy G5 of the Local Plan. For the reasons set out in this report, the application is recommended for refusal. In the event that this recommendation is accepted authority is sought for enforcement action to be taken against the unauthorised access. Human Rights In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application no particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to that recommended. ITEM No: 29 Application Site Address: S.04/0970/FUL Whispering Trees, Lower Washwell Lane, Painswick, Stroud 170
Site No: Parish: Recommendation Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 25361 Painswick Parish Council Grid Reference: 387100,209965 Application Type: Development: Applicant Details: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date Received: Full Planning Permission Erection of extensions. Mr S Bates Whispering Trees, Lower Washwell Lane, Painswick, Stroud, Gloucestershire GL6 6XW Mr Anthony Webster 5 Port Terrace, Brimscombe, Stroud, Glos, GL6 7ER Will Bridges 07.05.2004 Permission Subject to the following conditions: 1. The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of five years from the date of this permission. Reason: To comply with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 2. No development shall take place until samples of the walling and roofing materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the building works hereby permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Head of Development Services. Development shall then only be carried out in accordance with the approved details. Reason: In the interests of the visual amenities of the area in accordance with Policy G1 of the Stroud District Council Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). Informatives: 1. For the purposes of Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure)(England)(Amendment) Order 2003, the following reasons for the Council's decision are summarised below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision: The proposed development meets the criteria as set out in Policies G1 and H23 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). Both of which seek to ensure that the amenities of the neighbouring properties are not adversely affected by the proposal. The proposal would not result in the host dwelling having an 171
Page 1 and 2:
Stroud District Council SCHEDULE OF
Page 3 and 4:
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 5 and 6:
ITEM No: 01 Application: S.01/436 P
Page 7 and 8:
Materials: Roof Conc int tiles Wall
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Relevant Planning History Planning
Page 13 and 14:
ITEM No: 02 Application: S.03/1451
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
POLICY B9 Planning Schedule Date: 1
Page 21 and 22:
Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
Page 101 and 102:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Planning Considerations Planning Sc
Page 111 and 112:
Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 121 and 122: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 127 and 128: Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 129 and 130: Site Report: The site and the propo
Page 131 and 132: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
Page 135 and 136: Consultations/Representations: Neig
Page 137 and 138: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
Page 145 and 146: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 147 and 148: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 151 and 152: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 165 and 166: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 169: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 175 and 176: Recommendation Permission Planning
Page 179 and 180: Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 181 and 182: Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 185 and 186: Site No: Parish: Applicant Details:
Page 189 and 190: ITEM No: 34 Application Site Addres
Page 195 and 196: ITEM No: 36 Application Site Addres
Page 199 and 200: Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 203 and 204: Date Received: Planning Schedule Da
Page 213: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
show all

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?