01.12.2012 Views

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Grid Reference: 377244,201498<br />

Application Type:<br />

<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />

Development: Construction of new access including conversion of dining room to<br />

garage. (Resubmission following refusal S.03/C0304/FUL)<br />

Applicant Details:<br />

Agent Details:<br />

Full <strong>Planning</strong> Permission<br />

Case Officer: Eleanor Jackson<br />

<strong>Date</strong> Received:<br />

Mr And Mrs J Carter<br />

Fox And Hounds, The Street, Coaley, Gloucestershire<br />

Mr Philip Hodges<br />

Tetbury Upton, Tetbury, Gloucestershire, GL8 8LP<br />

25.06.<strong>2004</strong><br />

Recommendation Refusal<br />

Consultations/Representations:<br />

Parish / Town<br />

For the following reasons:<br />

1. Policy G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as<br />

amended June 2001) states that permission will not be granted for<br />

development that would be likely to be detrimental to the highway safety<br />

of any user of any highway or public right of way. In this instance, the site<br />

frontage is too restricted to provide for the visibility splays necessary to<br />

serve the proposed development. In addition, the layout of the vehicular<br />

access would be likely to encourage vehicles to reverse out onto the<br />

adjacent classified road all to the detriment of highway safety and<br />

contrary to the above policy.<br />

Object:<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> still had concerns about visibility leaving the site, constituting a highways safety<br />

issue. Also that visibility was somewhat dependant on the neighbouring property keeping their<br />

hedge at a fairly low height.<br />

County Surveyor (Initial)<br />

Recommend refusal on grounds that inadequate visibility and would encourage reversing onto<br />

highway.<br />

Neighbour Contributions<br />

168

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!