Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Grid Reference: 377244,201498<br />
Application Type:<br />
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
Development: Construction of new access including conversion of dining room to<br />
garage. (Resubmission following refusal S.03/C0304/FUL)<br />
Applicant Details:<br />
Agent Details:<br />
Full <strong>Planning</strong> Permission<br />
Case Officer: Eleanor Jackson<br />
<strong>Date</strong> Received:<br />
Mr And Mrs J Carter<br />
Fox And Hounds, The Street, Coaley, Gloucestershire<br />
Mr Philip Hodges<br />
Tetbury Upton, Tetbury, Gloucestershire, GL8 8LP<br />
25.06.<strong>2004</strong><br />
Recommendation Refusal<br />
Consultations/Representations:<br />
Parish / Town<br />
For the following reasons:<br />
1. Policy G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as<br />
amended June 2001) states that permission will not be granted for<br />
development that would be likely to be detrimental to the highway safety<br />
of any user of any highway or public right of way. In this instance, the site<br />
frontage is too restricted to provide for the visibility splays necessary to<br />
serve the proposed development. In addition, the layout of the vehicular<br />
access would be likely to encourage vehicles to reverse out onto the<br />
adjacent classified road all to the detriment of highway safety and<br />
contrary to the above policy.<br />
Object:<br />
The <strong>Council</strong> still had concerns about visibility leaving the site, constituting a highways safety<br />
issue. Also that visibility was somewhat dependant on the neighbouring property keeping their<br />
hedge at a fairly low height.<br />
County Surveyor (Initial)<br />
Recommend refusal on grounds that inadequate visibility and would encourage reversing onto<br />
highway.<br />
Neighbour Contributions<br />
168