Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
retain the character of the dwelling to be extended, the amenity of the site and that of<br />
neighbouring properties.<br />
Kings Stanley Parish <strong>Council</strong> has considered this application and object on the following grounds:<br />
"It seems apparent from my <strong>Council</strong>'s inspection that this development has had considerable<br />
impact on the local scene. The conservatory is very large and my <strong>Council</strong> feels that it could be<br />
an overdevelopment of the site. In my <strong>Council</strong>'s opinion it creates an overbearing and unneighbourly<br />
effect and we understand that a fence has been erected by a neighbour to reduce<br />
the effect it has had. We also understand that it is brightly lit at night and this could well create<br />
an unwelcome effect on the local scene".<br />
No letters of representation have been received as a result of neighbour notifications and the<br />
posting of a site notice.<br />
Whilst the conservatory is fairly large the roof slopes away from the neighbouring property<br />
minimising any loss of light or overbearing effect and the height of the eaves is not much higher<br />
than that of a fence which can be erected under permitted development rights. The effect of the<br />
conservatory on the neighbouring property to the north east, which is at a slightly lower level, has<br />
been inspected on site and is not felt to be unreasonable. Windows on the neighbouring<br />
properties which are closest to the conservatory are obscurely glazed and do not provide light to<br />
principal rooms. The neighbouring property to the south west is at a similar level with a much<br />
larger area of amenity land. Therefore the effect on the amenities of the occupiers of the<br />
neighbouring properties is not felt to be of a level to warrant refusing this application.<br />
Following construction of the conservatory the size of the remaining private amenity land for use<br />
by the occupiers of the enlarged dwelling, meets the <strong>Council</strong>'s standards as outlined in its<br />
Residential Design Guide. The height, size and design of the conservatory is felt to be in keeping<br />
with the scale and character of the existing dwelling.<br />
Therefore the proposal complies with the requirements of Policies G1 and H23 and permission is<br />
recommended.<br />
In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human<br />
Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected<br />
properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for<br />
private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this<br />
Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application<br />
no particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to<br />
that recommended.<br />
ITEM No: 28<br />
Application<br />
Site Address:<br />
Site No:<br />
Parish:<br />
S.04/1370/FUL<br />
Fox House, The Street, Coaley, Gloucestershire<br />
21629<br />
Coaley Parish <strong>Council</strong><br />
167