01.12.2012 Views

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />

retain the character of the dwelling to be extended, the amenity of the site and that of<br />

neighbouring properties.<br />

Kings Stanley Parish <strong>Council</strong> has considered this application and object on the following grounds:<br />

"It seems apparent from my <strong>Council</strong>'s inspection that this development has had considerable<br />

impact on the local scene. The conservatory is very large and my <strong>Council</strong> feels that it could be<br />

an overdevelopment of the site. In my <strong>Council</strong>'s opinion it creates an overbearing and unneighbourly<br />

effect and we understand that a fence has been erected by a neighbour to reduce<br />

the effect it has had. We also understand that it is brightly lit at night and this could well create<br />

an unwelcome effect on the local scene".<br />

No letters of representation have been received as a result of neighbour notifications and the<br />

posting of a site notice.<br />

Whilst the conservatory is fairly large the roof slopes away from the neighbouring property<br />

minimising any loss of light or overbearing effect and the height of the eaves is not much higher<br />

than that of a fence which can be erected under permitted development rights. The effect of the<br />

conservatory on the neighbouring property to the north east, which is at a slightly lower level, has<br />

been inspected on site and is not felt to be unreasonable. Windows on the neighbouring<br />

properties which are closest to the conservatory are obscurely glazed and do not provide light to<br />

principal rooms. The neighbouring property to the south west is at a similar level with a much<br />

larger area of amenity land. Therefore the effect on the amenities of the occupiers of the<br />

neighbouring properties is not felt to be of a level to warrant refusing this application.<br />

Following construction of the conservatory the size of the remaining private amenity land for use<br />

by the occupiers of the enlarged dwelling, meets the <strong>Council</strong>'s standards as outlined in its<br />

Residential Design Guide. The height, size and design of the conservatory is felt to be in keeping<br />

with the scale and character of the existing dwelling.<br />

Therefore the proposal complies with the requirements of Policies G1 and H23 and permission is<br />

recommended.<br />

In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human<br />

Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected<br />

properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for<br />

private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this<br />

Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application<br />

no particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to<br />

that recommended.<br />

ITEM No: 28<br />

Application<br />

Site Address:<br />

Site No:<br />

Parish:<br />

S.04/1370/FUL<br />

Fox House, The Street, Coaley, Gloucestershire<br />

21629<br />

Coaley Parish <strong>Council</strong><br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!