Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Planning Considerations Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 The relevant policy advice for this application is contained within policy G5. Policy G5 states: "Permission will not be granted for development that would be likely to be detrimental to the highway safety of any user or any highway or public right of way." Minchinhampton Parish Council objects to this application. They are concerned about parking in this area and feel the relocation would exacerbate this. The maximum car parking requirement for dwelling houses is two spaces per unit. The existing garage provides one parking space and the driveway to the front of the garage provides enough room to park two cars. Therefore the maximum car parking requirement for this dwelling is met. The original condition was imposed to ensure that the minimum standards were retained. In those circumstances there can be no reason to refuse this application. In view of the above permission to vary condition 17 of permission S.02/610 is recommended. In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application no particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to that recommended. ITEM No: 27 Application Site Address: Site No: Parish: Agent Details: None S.04/1197/FUL 76 Coldwell Lane, Middleyard, Kings Stanley, Stonehouse 25416 Kings Stanley Parish Council Grid Reference: 381723,202945 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Development: Retrospective application for erection of a conservatory. Applicant Details: Mr & Mrs Jones 76 Coldwell Lane, Middleyard, Kings Stanley, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, GL10 3PS 164
Case Officer: Date Received: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Rachel Brown 07.06.2004 Recommendation Permission Subject to the following conditions: Informatives: Consultations/Representations: Parish / Town 1. For the purposes of Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) (England) (Amendment) Order 2003, the following reasons for the Council's decision are summarised below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision: The proposal complies with the provisions of Policies G1 and H23 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). These seek to ensure proposals do not have an adverse effect on the amenities at present enjoyed by occupiers of neighbouring dwellings by reason of loss of light, loss of privacy or have an overbearing effect. The size of the plot is large enough to accommodate the proposal without resulting in a cramped or overdeveloped site. The height, size and design of the proposed extension is in keeping with the scale and character of the parent dwelling. Following construction of the extension sufficient space will exist for the parking of cars in accordance with the Council's standards and for use as private amenity space by the occupiers of the enlarged dwelling in accordance with the Council's adopted standards as outlined in its Residential Design Guide. Object: This is a retrospective application although it was not mentioned on the forms received. It seems apparent from the PCs inspection that this development has had a considerable impact on the local scene, The conservatory is very large and my council feels that it could be an overdevelopment of the site. In my Councils opinion it creates an overbearing and unneighbourly effect and we understand that a fence has been erected by a neighbour to reduce the effect it has had. We also understand that it is brightly lit at night and this could well create an unwelcome effect on the local scene. My council understands this is matter is being referred to Principal Planning Officers and the Enforcement Officers for discussion. My Council would ask that it be referred to the Planning Committee. Neighbour Contributions 165
Page 1 and 2:
Stroud District Council SCHEDULE OF
Page 3 and 4:
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 5 and 6:
ITEM No: 01 Application: S.01/436 P
Page 7 and 8:
Materials: Roof Conc int tiles Wall
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Relevant Planning History Planning
Page 13 and 14:
ITEM No: 02 Application: S.03/1451
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
POLICY B9 Planning Schedule Date: 1
Page 21 and 22:
Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
Page 101 and 102:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Planning Considerations Planning Sc
Page 111 and 112:
Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
Page 113 and 114: Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 115 and 116: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 121 and 122: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 129 and 130: Site Report: The site and the propo
Page 131 and 132: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
Page 135 and 136: Consultations/Representations: Neig
Page 137 and 138: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
Page 145 and 146: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 147 and 148: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 151 and 152: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 163: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 171 and 172: Site No: Parish: Recommendation Pla
Page 175 and 176: Recommendation Permission Planning
Page 179 and 180: Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 181 and 182: Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 185 and 186: Site No: Parish: Applicant Details:
Page 189 and 190: ITEM No: 34 Application Site Addres
Page 195 and 196: ITEM No: 36 Application Site Addres
Page 199 and 200: Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 203 and 204: Date Received: Planning Schedule Da
Page 213: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
show all

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?