01.12.2012 Views

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />

The site was on land adjoining Charfield Road Kingswood.<br />

The condition which this application is to remove required that:<br />

'Before the development hereby authorised is commenced details of the proposed footpath along<br />

the Charfield Road frontage shall be submitted to and agreed in writing with the Head of<br />

Development Services in consultation with the Highway Authority and the footpath details so<br />

approved shall be completed in all respects in accordance with the submitted details and shall be<br />

similarly maintained thereafter for that purpose.'<br />

Reason:<br />

In the interests of highway safety and to ensure the development accords with Policy G5 of the<br />

<strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />

At the time the application was originally considered, concerns from local residents and the<br />

Kingswood Parish <strong>Council</strong> were raised regarding the traffic situation in Charfield Road and how<br />

this could be improved by the provision of a footpath along the Charfield Road. To provide a<br />

suitable footpath would involve land outside of the applicants control and furthermore the<br />

Highway Authority do not feel that a safe footpath arrangement can be achieved. The developer<br />

at the time offered the site frontage of the land in their control to be used as a public footpath.<br />

The offer of this land remains.<br />

The wording of the condition requires that the applicants provide and maintain this section of new<br />

footpath before their development is commenced. The applicants feel such a requirement is<br />

unreasonable. They remain willing to make the land available but consider that the construction<br />

and maintenance of the footpath should be the responsibility of another body, such as the<br />

Highway Authority.<br />

The applicants also argue that the condition does not meet the test of reasonableness laid out in<br />

"Circular 11/95, The Use of Conditions in <strong>Planning</strong> Permission", particularly with regard to the<br />

need for the condition resulting from the new development itself and must be "genuinely" required<br />

by the users of the development. In this respect this argument is accepted.<br />

It is therefore recommended that the application be permitted and the condition replaced with a<br />

condition which requires the land for the footpath to be made available.<br />

In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human<br />

Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected<br />

properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for<br />

private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this<br />

Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application<br />

no particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to<br />

that recommended.<br />

ITEM No: 26<br />

Application<br />

Site Address:<br />

S.04/<strong>10</strong>84/VAR<br />

21 Barcelona Drive, Minchinhampton, Gloucestershire, GL6 9DS<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!