Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
The site was on land adjoining Charfield Road Kingswood.<br />
The condition which this application is to remove required that:<br />
'Before the development hereby authorised is commenced details of the proposed footpath along<br />
the Charfield Road frontage shall be submitted to and agreed in writing with the Head of<br />
Development Services in consultation with the Highway Authority and the footpath details so<br />
approved shall be completed in all respects in accordance with the submitted details and shall be<br />
similarly maintained thereafter for that purpose.'<br />
Reason:<br />
In the interests of highway safety and to ensure the development accords with Policy G5 of the<br />
<strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />
At the time the application was originally considered, concerns from local residents and the<br />
Kingswood Parish <strong>Council</strong> were raised regarding the traffic situation in Charfield Road and how<br />
this could be improved by the provision of a footpath along the Charfield Road. To provide a<br />
suitable footpath would involve land outside of the applicants control and furthermore the<br />
Highway Authority do not feel that a safe footpath arrangement can be achieved. The developer<br />
at the time offered the site frontage of the land in their control to be used as a public footpath.<br />
The offer of this land remains.<br />
The wording of the condition requires that the applicants provide and maintain this section of new<br />
footpath before their development is commenced. The applicants feel such a requirement is<br />
unreasonable. They remain willing to make the land available but consider that the construction<br />
and maintenance of the footpath should be the responsibility of another body, such as the<br />
Highway Authority.<br />
The applicants also argue that the condition does not meet the test of reasonableness laid out in<br />
"Circular 11/95, The Use of Conditions in <strong>Planning</strong> Permission", particularly with regard to the<br />
need for the condition resulting from the new development itself and must be "genuinely" required<br />
by the users of the development. In this respect this argument is accepted.<br />
It is therefore recommended that the application be permitted and the condition replaced with a<br />
condition which requires the land for the footpath to be made available.<br />
In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human<br />
Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected<br />
properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for<br />
private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this<br />
Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application<br />
no particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to<br />
that recommended.<br />
ITEM No: 26<br />
Application<br />
Site Address:<br />
S.04/<strong>10</strong>84/VAR<br />
21 Barcelona Drive, Minchinhampton, Gloucestershire, GL6 9DS<br />
161