Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
retention of stables within an existing building. That work is now shown on a separate application,<br />
S.04/1220 which is also under consideration at this meeting.<br />
The original application was for a riding arena and the applicants were informed at that time that<br />
permission was unlikely to be forthcoming to use it for business purposes. The previous<br />
application to remove the condition was refused in January of this year on the following grounds;<br />
"The proposal would result in sporadic commercial development in the open countryside at a<br />
location which is poorly served by public transport and where there would be a high reliance on<br />
the private motor car to serve the site, As a result the development would be likely to result in an<br />
intensification in vehicular use of the sub- standard access serving the site to the detriment<br />
of highway safety and contrary to Policy G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit<br />
Version as amended June 2001".<br />
In order to attempt to overcome this objection the applicant has proposed alterations to the site<br />
access and access road. The alterations include the removal of a length of mature boundary<br />
hedgerow to improve visibility. This hedge is visually important to the edge of the village and its<br />
loss would be detrimental to the conservation and enhancement of the natural beauty of the<br />
landscape. The hedgerow may be considered 'important' under the terms of the Hedgerow<br />
Regulations 1997 and the section of hedge is being considered against the set criteria at the time<br />
of writing. The result of this investigation will be verbally reported at the meeting. If the hedgerow<br />
is considered important then the application should also be refused under Policy N11 of the<br />
<strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version as amended June 2001.<br />
Nothwithstanding these proposals the Highway Authority still object to the proposal which is<br />
accordingly recommended for refusal.<br />
In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human<br />
Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected<br />
properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for<br />
private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this<br />
Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application no<br />
particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to that<br />
recommended.<br />
ITEM No: 23<br />
Application<br />
Site Address:<br />
Site No:<br />
Parish:<br />
S.04/1286/COU<br />
Grid Reference: 379209,191184<br />
Application Type:<br />
Development:<br />
Stable Building, Furlong Lane, Tresham, Wotton-Under-Edge<br />
16114<br />
Hillesley And Tresham Parish <strong>Council</strong><br />
Change of Use<br />
Conversion of redundant stable building to mixed use residential/<br />
business use.<br />
150