Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Mr & Mrs T Burns, Portcullis, Hillesley B N O'Brien, Kilcott House, Hillesley Mr W Franks, The Cottage, High Street Mr & Mrs Hibbitt, Martine Cottage, Hillesley Mr & Mrs McCoubrie, Oakfield House, Hawkesbury Road Livy McGrath, 4 Hawkesbury Road, Hillesley Mrs Janet Cadman, Hazel Cottage, High Street Alan S Clark, 25 Hawkesbury Road, Hillesley Mr R Davis, No Address On Letter Paul Hill & Tracey Smale, 19 Hawkesbury Road, Hillesley Mr N Young & Ms S Jeffs, 7 Reeds Row, Hawkesbury Road Mr Hicks, Roseladden, High Street Occupier, Horseshoe Cottage, Hillesley C Buckley, 6 School Close, Hillesley Mrs J Barrett, 1 The Deans, Hawkesbury Road J Witt, Ebenezer Cottage, High Street A L Doughty, The Old Manor House, High Street D A Lamb, Lavender Cottage, Kingswood Road S Hicks & S Garland, Tuliptree Cottage, Hawkesbury Road Mrs M Plummer, Thornaway, Kingswood Road I P & J E K Dickens, Petty Croft, Kingswood Road Ms P Glider, No Address Petition With 101 Signatures • Outside the village development boundary. • AONB. • Two equestrian centres nearby. • Access unsuitable. • Not a sustainable location. • Increase in traffic. • Object to additional noise and disturbance. • Entrance is totally unsuitable. • Changes to access/road will be detrimental to visual amenity. • Will involve removal of large section of hedgerow which is unnecessary. • No limits to what this may mean eg trading estates, warehousing • Prone to flooding. • Loss of view. • Loss of privacy. • Erosion of green field sites due to ad hoc development. • AONB. • Increased noise and pollution. • The site access is visually restricted but also opens on to a road carrying fast moving traffic. • Light pollution. • Already have riding facilities and livery in the village so this service is already provided. • Permission given for a smaller development but was 'built wrong' so retrospective was applied for, for 'commercial size'. • Will result in sporadic commercial development on Green Field site outside the village boundary. • If the business/land what trade will be carried on by the new owners? • Level of traffic means it will only be a matter of time before an accident happens. • Hedgerow a consistent theme along Hawkesbury Upton Road. • Removal of the hedgerow would have a significant impact on writers privacy. • Noise pollution. • Contrary to Highways Policy G5. 148
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 • Additional buildings inevitable to accommodate facilities needed. • Served by a single road. • One in a series of developments appears to be 'development by stealth'. • Detrimental to the village of Hillesley. • Entrance and roadside already altered without permission. • Owners live elsewhere which is unsatisfactory where the care of animals is concerned. • Previous application rejected. • Land does not comprise a farm. • When owners bought the land they stated it was only for personal use. Site Location: Site Report: This application is for the removal of a condition placed on a previous application (S.00/1712)to allow the site to be used for trade or business purposes. The site is located at Woodmans Farm in Hillesley. Members may remember that a similar application was refused following a visit by the Sites Inspection Panel in January of this year. That application also included other works, including the 149
Page 1 and 2:
Stroud District Council SCHEDULE OF
Page 3 and 4:
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 5 and 6:
ITEM No: 01 Application: S.01/436 P
Page 7 and 8:
Materials: Roof Conc int tiles Wall
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Relevant Planning History Planning
Page 13 and 14:
ITEM No: 02 Application: S.03/1451
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
POLICY B9 Planning Schedule Date: 1
Page 21 and 22:
Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 99 and 100: ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
Page 101 and 102: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 109 and 110: Planning Considerations Planning Sc
Page 111 and 112: Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
Page 113 and 114: Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 121 and 122: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 129 and 130: Site Report: The site and the propo
Page 131 and 132: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
Page 135 and 136: Consultations/Representations: Neig
Page 137 and 138: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
Page 147: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 151 and 152: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 165 and 166: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 171 and 172: Site No: Parish: Recommendation Pla
Page 175 and 176: Recommendation Permission Planning
Page 179 and 180: Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 181 and 182: Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 185 and 186: Site No: Parish: Applicant Details:
Page 199 and 200:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Date Received: Planning Schedule Da
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
show all

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?