Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Consultations/Representations:
Parish / Town
Support.
Mr W Davison
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
(General Development Procedure) (England) (Amendment) Order
2003, the following reasons for the Council's decision are summarised
below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained
within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision:
The proposal, subject to compliance with the conditions attached to this
permission, complies with the provisions of Policies G1 and G5 of the
Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June
2001). These seek proposals do not have an adverse impact on the
amenities at present enjoyed by occupiers of neighbouring dwellings by
reason of unacceptable level of noise and general disturbance and loss
of privacy. The development would be unlikely to detrimental to the
highway safety of any user of any highway or public right of way.
Draw applicant's attention to HSE Guidance note GS6 (Avoidance of danger from Overhead
Electric Lines, Third Edition 1997).
County Surveyor (Initial)
No highway objection
Neighbour Contributions
Letters of Objection
M Hazlewood, Miramont, Whitminster Lane
Mr & Mrs Harding, Southfield, Whitminster Lane
Mr & Mrs Hall, Brookhurst, Whitminster Lane
Pip Lawson & Richard Kirby, The School House, Whitminster Lane
Mr M John, Oatfield Cottages, Whitminster Lane
• Noise pollution.
• Greenbelt.
• Poses a danger to vehicles and walkers in the lane.
• Power lines present a danger to footballers.
• The proposed changing facilities building is outside the village development boundary how
can it be possible for them to have a permanent structure there?
• Access.
• Traffic will spill into the road and pose a safety issue.
• Movement of the changing facilities will restrict parking spaces.
• Loss of privacy.
Letters of Comment
139