Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 The nature and number of vehicle movements associated with four apartments is less than associated with a working yard, with the type of vehicles being far more appropriate for a residential area than a number of commercial vehicles. The reduction is vehicle numbers and size would also have less impact on the surrounding road network. In acknowledgement of the sub-standard nature of the surrounding roads, the scheme includes the provision of a turning area which, subject to suitable parking controls, would provide a distinct benefit to all of the local residents. The provision of such a facility would not prejudice the ability of emergency vehicles to access the site. Whilst the scheme would result in the loss of parking for the existing residents, this parking is of an informal nature only and is not protected. Again this loss would occur if the authorised use of the yard recommenced. Recommendation The scheme represents an acceptable form of residential development which in light of the authorised use of the site will not give rise to adverse concerns of highway safety. The proposal therefore accords with Policies H14 and G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001) and conditional permission is recommended. Sites Inspection Panel The Panel walked along Churchfield Road noting the grain of the street, as well as the vernacular style. The current dilapidated condition of the application site was also evident and the position of the adjacent dwellings. The siting of the new dwellings and the proposed parking/turning areas were indicated. The Ward Member, Cllr. Majoram highlighted the character of the existing streetscene and the existing houses, and felt that the scheme was poorly designed and overdevelopment. He also suggested that there are current problems of parking and narrow access roads, and disputed the use as a builders yard. The Town council was not represented . The Panel generally supported the principle of the scheme, but felt that the design was too bland and failed to respond adequately to the context. Furthermore, there seemed to be scope to increase car parking by the turning head. Application Update Following the Sites Inspection Panel revised plans have been submitted indicating a revised design for the four apartments which better reflects the local vernacular. In addition the proposed turning head has been deleted and replaced with additional parking spaces and increased carriageway width. In this manner an element of replacement parking is proposed to off-set the informal areas lost due to the development together with an enhancement of the existing road network. These amendments would result in an acceptable form of development which accords not only with the aforementioned policies but also with the comments of the Sites Inspection Panel. Condtional permission is recommended. In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application no particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to that recommended. 12
ITEM No: 02 Application: S.03/1451 Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Site Address: Land at The Retreat Westward Road Stroud Site Number: 22330 Parish: Cainscross Grid Reference: SO 83370 04830 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Development: Regrading of garden land. (Revised Plans received 12/9/03) Applicant Details: Chelbury Homes Ltd Chelbury Vaults 32 Queens Road Cheltenham GL50 2LT Agent Details: Mr P. H. Tufnell Tufnell Town + Country Planning, Waverley Studio Gloucester Road Hartpury GL19 3BG Case Officer: Darryl J.Rogers Date Received: 28/07/2003 Recommendation: Permission Subject to the following conditions: 1) 101 Standard - Planning Permission. 2) A strip of land 8m wide adjacent to the top of the northern bank along the line of the restored Stroudwater Canal shall be kept clear of all new buildings and structures (including gates, walls and fences) unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Head of Development Services. Ground levels must not be raised within this area. Informatives: Reason: In order to ensure adequate access is provided to the watercourse for the purposes of maintenance. 1) For the purposes of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) (England) (Amendent) Order 2003, the following reasons for the Council's decision are summarised below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision: The proposal will not have a detrimental impact on either the residential amenity of the area or the character and appearance of the designated Stroud Industrial Heritage Conservation Area. The raised ground levels will not harm the overall visual amenity of the area and suitable conditions are imposed to safeguard maintenance of the adjacent watercourse. 13
Page 1 and 2: Stroud District Council SCHEDULE OF
Page 3 and 4: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 5 and 6: ITEM No: 01 Application: S.01/436 P
Page 7 and 8: Materials: Roof Conc int tiles Wall
Page 11: Relevant Planning History Planning
Page 19 and 20: POLICY B9 Planning Schedule Date: 1
Page 21 and 22: Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 33 and 34: Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 41 and 42: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 63 and 64:
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
Page 101 and 102:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Planning Considerations Planning Sc
Page 111 and 112:
Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Site Report: The site and the propo
Page 131 and 132:
Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Consultations/Representations: Neig
Page 137 and 138:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Site No: Parish: Recommendation Pla
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Recommendation Permission Planning
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 181 and 182:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Site No: Parish: Applicant Details:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Date Received: Planning Schedule Da
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
show all

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?