Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 • Dangerous road. • Sewerage and drainage problems. • Road would be unsuitable to serve more than 2 houses. • Existing property is only derelict due to neglect. • Access has already been put in. • Layout suggests further plans may be submitted for more dwellings. • Stream has been re-routed without permissions. • Concerns about construction works - when work being done previously telephone pole supports were ripped out. • Safety. • Not derelict. • Holds historical interest. • Brookside can be restored tastefully. • Part of village landscape will be lost. • Part still agricultural land. • Increase in traffic on an unsuitable road. • Access would be better placed alongside the existing access to Tannery Cottages. • Brookside should be restored. Site Location: 128
Site Report: The site and the proposal Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 The site lies at the edge of the village, within the development boundary located on the western side of Leonard Stanley. The application is for outline planning permission for the erection of two dwellings. The external appearance and design and have been reserved for future consideration. The site is within the curtilage of the existing dwelling, Brookside which was damaged by fire some time ago. Brookside is removed as part of this scheme and replaced with two dwellings facing onto Bath Road. The site plan shows the means of vehicular access to the site being taken to the side of plot 1 and on the other side of the stream. Relevant Site History S.00/1277. A planning application was granted on 10/10/2000 which allowed the property known as Brookside, located within the settlement area, to be converted into two dwellings with parking/garaging to the rear. In granting this a new access was permitted to serve both of the resulting dwellings. S.00/1669 Erection of two dwellings on land to the side of Brookside. Refused 2000. S.02/1057 Outline application for the erection of six dwellings (two affordable) and construction of vehicular access. Refused and dismissed at appeal in May 2003. S.03/366 Outline application for five dwellings including one affordable unit. Refused 13.1.04 S.03/373 Outline application for four dwellings. Refused 13.4.03. Planning considerations The site is bordered on three sides by hedging and small trees. A brook runs across the front of the site and along both sides. Part of the hedge to the front of the site is to be removed to provide visibility for the new access. This has however already been permitted under S.00/1277, above. Policies G1, G2, G5, and H14 and T1 of the Stroud District Local Plan are all relevant to this application. Policies G1 and G2 seek to prevent development which would have an unacceptable effect due to noise, general disturbance, smell, fumes, loss of day light or sunlight, loss of privacy, have an overbearing effect or be development which will create an unacceptable atmospheric or environmental pollution to water, land or air. The design of the houses is a reserved matter and therefore will be considered at a later stage. The houses fronting the road are however positioned exactly on the footprint of the existing dwelling and therefore no greater loss of amenity will exist to the occupiers of the dwellings opposite than on the approved scheme to split Brookside into two dwellings, assuming that detailed plans are submitted for dwellings of similar size, height and fenestration. The houses are approximately 20 metres away. The proposal should be considered under Policy H14. The indicative plans show two large detached dwellings. This would not normally be in accordance with Policy H14 which requires the site to be developed as densely as possible and with a mix of house types. However as the Highway Authority have objected to any increase in numbers on the grounds of sustainability, two dwellings are considered acceptable in this particular case. 129
- Page 77 and 78: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 79 and 80: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 81 and 82: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 83 and 84: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 85 and 86: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 87 and 88: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 89 and 90: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 91 and 92: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 93 and 94: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 95 and 96: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 97 and 98: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 99 and 100: ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
- Page 101 and 102: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 103 and 104: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 105 and 106: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 107 and 108: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 109 and 110: Planning Considerations Planning Sc
- Page 111 and 112: Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
- Page 113 and 114: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 115 and 116: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 117 and 118: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 119 and 120: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 121 and 122: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
- Page 123 and 124: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 125 and 126: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 127: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 131 and 132: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
- Page 133 and 134: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 135 and 136: Consultations/Representations: Neig
- Page 137 and 138: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
- Page 139 and 140: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 141 and 142: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 143 and 144: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 145 and 146: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 147 and 148: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
- Page 149 and 150: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 151 and 152: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
- Page 153 and 154: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 155 and 156: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 157 and 158: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 159 and 160: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 161 and 162: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 163 and 164: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 165 and 166: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
- Page 167 and 168: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 169 and 170: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 171 and 172: Site No: Parish: Recommendation Pla
- Page 173 and 174: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 175 and 176: Recommendation Permission Planning
- Page 177 and 178: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
• Dangerous road.<br />
• Sewerage and drainage problems.<br />
• Road would be unsuitable to serve more than 2 houses.<br />
• Existing property is only derelict due to neglect.<br />
• Access has already been put in.<br />
• Layout suggests further plans may be submitted for more dwellings.<br />
• Stream has been re-routed without permissions.<br />
• Concerns about construction works - when work being done previously telephone pole<br />
supports were ripped out.<br />
• Safety.<br />
• Not derelict.<br />
• Holds historical interest.<br />
• Brookside can be restored tastefully.<br />
• Part of village landscape will be lost.<br />
• Part still agricultural land.<br />
• Increase in traffic on an unsuitable road.<br />
• Access would be better placed alongside the existing access to Tannery Cottages.<br />
• Brookside should be restored.<br />
Site Location:<br />
128
Change language