Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 9. The proposed development shall not be brought into use until the existing frontage boundaries either side of the vehicular access have been removed and lowered to provide visibility splays extending from a point 2.4 metres back from the carriageway edge along the access centre line to a point on the nearside carriageway edge at the edge of the boundary with the applicants control in each direction. Any new boundary, fence or other enclosure shall be erected on or behind the splay lines so defined, with the area in advance maintained permanently clear of obstructions to visibility at a height not exceeding 0.75 metres above the adjacent carriageway level. Reason: To ensure that adequate visibility is provided and maintained in the interests of highway safety. 10. The development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until a scheme for the provision of surface water drainage works and the disposal of foul sewage has been submitted to and agreed in writing by the Head of Development Services. All such drainage works shall be completed in accordance with the details so agreed and maintained as such thereafter. Reason: To prevent the increased risk of flooding by ensuring the provision of a satisfactory means of surface water disposal and to minimise the risk of pollution. 11. A strip of land 8 metres wide adjacent to the top of both banks of all watercourses on the site shall be kept clear of all new buildings and structures (including gates, fences and walls) unless agreed otherwise in writing by the Head of Development Services in consultation with the Environment Agency. Ground levels shall not be raised within this area. Reason: To maintain access to the watercourse for maintenance or improvements and to provide for overland flood flows. Informatives: 1. For the purposes of Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) (England) (Amendment) Order 2003, the following reasons for the Council's decision are summarised below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision: The proposal complies with the provisions of Policies G1 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001) which seek to ensure proposals do not adversely affect the amenities at present enjoyed by occupiers of neighbouring dwellings by reason of overbearing effect or loss of light. The proposal should be considered against Policy H14 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001 which seeks to ensure that developments are of a scale layout and design compatible with the settlement and would not cause harm to its character and appearance. The revised layout improves the proposal 126
Consultations/Representations: Parish / Town Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 and the scheme can now be designed to accord with that policy. The proposal should be considered against Policy G4 which seeks to prevent flood risk as a result of development proposals and policy G5 which seeks to ensure that highway safety is not compromised as a result of development. 2. The proposed development will require the provision of a vehicular crossing from the carriageway and the Applicant is required to obtain the permission of Gloucestershire County Council's Divisional Surveyor for the area: Southern 01453-822193 before commencing works on the highway. 3. Floor levels should be set at least 600mm above the 1 in 100 year flood level to provide adequate protection to the new dwellings from flooding. Support: Parish Councillors support a development of two houses but would object to any further development of this site for reasons stated on S.03/373. Neighbour Contributions Letters of Objection F Robson, 6 Seven Waters, Leonard Stanley Mr & Mrs D Longworth, Hafren, Seven Waters Ms M Forder, 38 Seven Waters, Leonard Stanley Mrs L Niebrzydowski, 40 Seven Waters, Leonard Stanley Sarah Shaw-Maslin, 2 Seven Waters, Leonard Stanley Mr & Mrs Hinchcliffe, 32 Seven Waters, Leonard Stanley M A Mukasa, 4 Seven Waters, Leonard Stanley Mr Cooke & Ms Beckingham, 22 Seven Waters, Leonard Stanley Ms E Semadeni, 26 Seven Waters, Leonard Stanley Mr D Price, Church Villa, The Street • If permitted could leave space for 2 more dwellings which have previously been rejected - 2 larger centrally placed dwellings with extra parking/garages would be more appropriate. • As no garages shown, only parking spaces, could lead to further on road parking in area. • Previous appeal dismissed less than 2 years ago. Why is this application being considered? Those reasons still apply. • Revised Plans - Remain non-central and still resemble the first phase of a 4 dwelling development. • More suitable to renovate existing house. • Similar to the refused application. • Size and position of the building inappropriate. • Poor parking provision. 127
Page 1 and 2:
Stroud District Council SCHEDULE OF
Page 3 and 4:
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 5 and 6:
ITEM No: 01 Application: S.01/436 P
Page 7 and 8:
Materials: Roof Conc int tiles Wall
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Relevant Planning History Planning
Page 13 and 14:
ITEM No: 02 Application: S.03/1451
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
POLICY B9 Planning Schedule Date: 1
Page 21 and 22:
Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 91 and 92: Consultations/Representations: Pari
Page 99 and 100: ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
Page 101 and 102: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Page 109 and 110: Planning Considerations Planning Sc
Page 111 and 112: Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
Page 121 and 122: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 125: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Page 129 and 130: Site Report: The site and the propo
Page 131 and 132: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
Page 135 and 136: Consultations/Representations: Neig
Page 137 and 138: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
Page 147 and 148: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 151 and 152: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
Page 165 and 166: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
Page 171 and 172: Site No: Parish: Recommendation Pla
Page 175 and 176: Recommendation Permission Planning
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Neighbour Contributions Site Locati
Page 181 and 182:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Site No: Parish: Applicant Details:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
ITEM No: 34 Application Site Addres
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
ITEM No: 36 Application Site Addres
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Application Type: Development: Appl
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Date Received: Planning Schedule Da
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213:
show all

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?