Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001 and Housing Policy amendments September 2003). It is considered that the proposed dwelling is of a suitable scale and design for this conservation area location and would not result in the loss of an important open area. Adequate amenity and parking space is provided for the development. The site of the proposed dwelling is fairly spacious and in character with the surrounding large dwellings. The proposal is unlikely to have any significant impact upon the adjoining surrounding dwellings being some 40m away from the adjacent Old Vicarage. It is therefore considered that there would be no detrimental affect to neighbouring properties. It is considered that there would be no detrimental affect upon the setting of the adjoining listed buildings or the character or appearance of the Conservation Area. The Highway Authority have raised concerns regarding the suitability of the access serving Stinchcombe Manor, however, it is not considered that the traffic generated by this additional dwelling would significantly increase the level of which is already generated by the use as a nursing home which would justify refusing the application on these grounds. Objectors have raised issues which include a covenant on the use of the tennis court. This is a civil matter and not one for your consideration. Other matters they have raised are dealt with in this report. Permission is therefore recommended. In compiling this recommendation we have given full consideration to all aspects of the Human Rights Act 1998 in relation to the applicant and/or the occupiers of any neighbouring or affected properties. In particular regard has been had to Article 8 of the ECHR (Right to Respect for private and family life) and the requirement to ensure that any interference with the right in this Article is both permissible and proportionate. On analysing the issues raised by the application no particular matters, other than those referred to in this report, warranted any different action to that recommended. ITEM No: 16 Application Site Address: Site No: Parish: S.04/0797/COU Land At, Cranham Lodge, Sanatorium Road, Cranham 22076 Cranham Parish Council Grid Reference: 390760,213242 Application Type: Development: Change of Use Conversion of redundant building to residential dwelling with parking to the rear. 120
Applicant Details: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date Received: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 The Trustees Of The Witcombe Estate C/o Carter Jonas LLP, Anchor House, 269 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7LL Mr Ian Gillespie Carter Jonas LLP, Anchor House, 269 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7LL Jane Breakspear 16.04.2004 Recommendation Refusal Consultations/Representations: Parish / Town For the following reasons: 1. The proposed development would be likely to result in an intensification in vehicular use of the sub-standard access serving the site to the detriment of highway safety. The proposal is therefore not in accordance with Policy G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). 2. The site is served by a series of narrow sub-standard access roads and hazardous road junctions and, such conditions are totally unsuitable to cater for the increased traffic resulting from the proposed development. The proposal is therefore not in accordance with Policy G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). 3. The site is located within open countryside and is not served by adequate footpaths, cycleways, or public transport facilities and the development would be likely therefore to increase reliance on the private car contrary to central and local planning policy and Policy T1 of the Stroud District Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). Support - will enhance this somewhat derelict area. Environment Agency Support: Will enhance this somewhat derelict area. Neighbour Contributions 121
- Page 69 and 70: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 71 and 72: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 73 and 74: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 75 and 76: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 77 and 78: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 79 and 80: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 81 and 82: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 83 and 84: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 85 and 86: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 87 and 88: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 89 and 90: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 91 and 92: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 93 and 94: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 95 and 96: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 97 and 98: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 99 and 100: ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
- Page 101 and 102: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 103 and 104: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 105 and 106: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 107 and 108: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 109 and 110: Planning Considerations Planning Sc
- Page 111 and 112: Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
- Page 113 and 114: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 115 and 116: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 117 and 118: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 119: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 123 and 124: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 125 and 126: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 127 and 128: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 129 and 130: Site Report: The site and the propo
- Page 131 and 132: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
- Page 133 and 134: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 135 and 136: Consultations/Representations: Neig
- Page 137 and 138: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
- Page 139 and 140: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 141 and 142: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 143 and 144: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 145 and 146: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 147 and 148: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
- Page 149 and 150: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 151 and 152: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
- Page 153 and 154: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 155 and 156: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 157 and 158: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 159 and 160: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 161 and 162: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 163 and 164: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 165 and 166: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
- Page 167 and 168: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 169 and 170: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
Applicant Details:<br />
Agent Details:<br />
Case Officer:<br />
<strong>Date</strong> Received:<br />
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
The Trustees Of The Witcombe Estate<br />
C/o Carter Jonas LLP, Anchor House, 269 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2<br />
7LL<br />
Mr Ian Gillespie<br />
Carter Jonas LLP, Anchor House, 269 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7LL<br />
Jane Breakspear<br />
16.04.<strong>2004</strong><br />
Recommendation Refusal<br />
Consultations/Representations:<br />
Parish / Town<br />
For the following reasons:<br />
1. The proposed development would be likely to result in an intensification<br />
in vehicular use of the sub-standard access serving the site to the<br />
detriment of highway safety. The proposal is therefore not in accordance<br />
with Policy G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version<br />
(as amended June 2001).<br />
2. The site is served by a series of narrow sub-standard access roads and<br />
hazardous road junctions and, such conditions are totally unsuitable to<br />
cater for the increased traffic resulting from the proposed development.<br />
The proposal is therefore not in accordance with Policy G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />
3. The site is located within open countryside and is not served by adequate<br />
footpaths, cycleways, or public transport facilities and the development<br />
would be likely therefore to increase reliance on the private car contrary<br />
to central and local planning policy and Policy T1 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />
Local Plan Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />
Support - will enhance this somewhat derelict area.<br />
Environment Agency<br />
Support:<br />
Will enhance this somewhat derelict area.<br />
Neighbour Contributions<br />
121
Change language