Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Consultations/Representations:
Parish / Town
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
important to the character of the settlement, nor are there any important
features on the site worthy of retention. The area of amenity space
provided is appropriate to serve the future occupiers, all in accordance
with Policy H14.
One parking space is provided to serve each dwelling and it would be
unreasonable to require increased provision. The proposal is in
accordance with Policy T1. No significant harm would result either by
loss of light, loss of privacy or dominating effect on the amenities of the
occupiers of neighbouring properties in accordance with Policy G1. On
balance the proposal would not harm highway safety to a level where
refusal would be warranted solely for this reason. The proposal is in
accordance with Policy G5.
2. There is a public sewer which crosses the site. The applicant may wish
to discuss with Severn Trent the implications of this and apply for its
diversion.
Comments:
We are concerned that another house will exacerbate the congestion and parking problems.
Neighbour Contributions
Letters of Objection
Mrs W Thickey, 63 Etheldene Road, Cashes Green
Mr & Mrs Chilcott, 65 Etheldene Road, Cashes Green
Anna Burns & Dale Burrell, 1 Devonia Terrace, Springfield Road
R Maller, 34 Etheldene Road, Cashes Green
H D & D M Legg, 3 Devonia Terrace, Springfield Road
Mr T Browning, 2 Hillcrest, Springfield Road
• Access opposite writers driveway.
• Narrow road.
• Poor services.
• Increase in traffic. Difficult to park.
• Increase noise.
• Overcrowding and loss of privacy.
• Loss of privacy and light, if built level with the footpath. Traffic problems in an already
crowded area.
• Passing road is narrow and creates problems accessing the site, and is too narrow to cope
with the building activity. Condition on nearby property regarding site workers car park was
ignored and SDC admits in practice is often unenforceable.
113