Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Reason: To ensure the access roads in the vicinity of the site are kept free from construction traffic, in the interests of highway safety, to accord with Policy G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). 5. Prior to the commencement of development details of parking provision to serve the site shall be submitted to and agreed in writing with the Head of Development Services. Such provision as agreed shall be provided, and made available for use prior to first occupation of the dwelling, and similarly maintained thereafter solely for the parking of vehicles. Reason: To ensure sufficient parking is provided and maintained to serve the site, in the interests of highway safety and to accord with Policy G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). 6. The development hereby permitted shall not commence until drainage works for the disposal of both surface water and foul sewage have been carried out in accordance with the details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Head of Development Services. Reason: To ensure that the development is provided with a satisfactory means of drainage as well as to reduce the risk of flooding and to minimise the risk of pollution, to accord with Policy G2 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). Informatives: 1. For the purposes of Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) (England) (Amendment) Order 2003, the following reasons for the Council's decision are summarised below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision: The site is located within a settlement boundary and it is considered against Policies H14, T1, G1 and G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001 including Housing Amendments September 2004). The relevant sections of these require that development: is of a scale, layout and design compatible with that part of the settlement in which it would be located, and would not cause harm to the character and appearance of that part of the settlement; it would not cause the loss of, or damage to, any open space which is important to the character of the settlement; any natural or built features on the site and worthy of retention have been incorporated into the scheme; and an appropriate area of private amenity space is provided for the occupiers of the dwelling-house; appropriate levels of parking are provided in accordance with the Council's Parking Standards; and no detrimental effect results either on the amenities of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties or highway safety result. The proposal is of a scale, layout and design in keeping with the character and appearance of the surrounding settlement, it is not 112
Consultations/Representations: Parish / Town Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 important to the character of the settlement, nor are there any important features on the site worthy of retention. The area of amenity space provided is appropriate to serve the future occupiers, all in accordance with Policy H14. One parking space is provided to serve each dwelling and it would be unreasonable to require increased provision. The proposal is in accordance with Policy T1. No significant harm would result either by loss of light, loss of privacy or dominating effect on the amenities of the occupiers of neighbouring properties in accordance with Policy G1. On balance the proposal would not harm highway safety to a level where refusal would be warranted solely for this reason. The proposal is in accordance with Policy G5. 2. There is a public sewer which crosses the site. The applicant may wish to discuss with Severn Trent the implications of this and apply for its diversion. Comments: We are concerned that another house will exacerbate the congestion and parking problems. Neighbour Contributions Letters of Objection Mrs W Thickey, 63 Etheldene Road, Cashes Green Mr & Mrs Chilcott, 65 Etheldene Road, Cashes Green Anna Burns & Dale Burrell, 1 Devonia Terrace, Springfield Road R Maller, 34 Etheldene Road, Cashes Green H D & D M Legg, 3 Devonia Terrace, Springfield Road Mr T Browning, 2 Hillcrest, Springfield Road • Access opposite writers driveway. • Narrow road. • Poor services. • Increase in traffic. Difficult to park. • Increase noise. • Overcrowding and loss of privacy. • Loss of privacy and light, if built level with the footpath. Traffic problems in an already crowded area. • Passing road is narrow and creates problems accessing the site, and is too narrow to cope with the building activity. Condition on nearby property regarding site workers car park was ignored and SDC admits in practice is often unenforceable. 113
- Page 61 and 62: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 63 and 64: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 65 and 66: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 67 and 68: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 69 and 70: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 71 and 72: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 73 and 74: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 75 and 76: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 77 and 78: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 79 and 80: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 81 and 82: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 83 and 84: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 85 and 86: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 87 and 88: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 89 and 90: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 91 and 92: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 93 and 94: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 95 and 96: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 97 and 98: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 99 and 100: ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
- Page 101 and 102: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 103 and 104: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 105 and 106: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 107 and 108: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 109 and 110: Planning Considerations Planning Sc
- Page 111: Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
- Page 115 and 116: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 117 and 118: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 119 and 120: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 121 and 122: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
- Page 123 and 124: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 125 and 126: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 127 and 128: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 129 and 130: Site Report: The site and the propo
- Page 131 and 132: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
- Page 133 and 134: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 135 and 136: Consultations/Representations: Neig
- Page 137 and 138: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
- Page 139 and 140: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 141 and 142: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 143 and 144: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 145 and 146: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 147 and 148: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
- Page 149 and 150: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 151 and 152: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
- Page 153 and 154: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 155 and 156: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 157 and 158: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 159 and 160: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 161 and 162: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
Reason:<br />
To ensure the access roads in the vicinity of the site are kept free from<br />
construction traffic, in the interests of highway safety, to accord with<br />
Policy G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as<br />
amended June 2001).<br />
5. Prior to the commencement of development details of parking provision<br />
to serve the site shall be submitted to and agreed in writing with the Head<br />
of Development Services. Such provision as agreed shall be provided,<br />
and made available for use prior to first occupation of the dwelling, and<br />
similarly maintained thereafter solely for the parking of vehicles.<br />
Reason:<br />
To ensure sufficient parking is provided and maintained to serve the site,<br />
in the interests of highway safety and to accord with Policy G5 of the<br />
<strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June<br />
2001).<br />
6. The development hereby permitted shall not commence until drainage<br />
works for the disposal of both surface water and foul sewage have been<br />
carried out in accordance with the details to be submitted to and agreed<br />
in writing by the Head of Development Services.<br />
Reason:<br />
To ensure that the development is provided with a satisfactory means of<br />
drainage as well as to reduce the risk of flooding and to minimise the risk<br />
of pollution, to accord with Policy G2 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan,<br />
Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />
Informatives:<br />
1. For the purposes of Article 22 of the Town and Country <strong>Planning</strong><br />
(General Development Procedure) (England) (Amendment) Order<br />
2003, the following reasons for the <strong>Council</strong>'s decision are summarised<br />
below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained<br />
within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision:<br />
The site is located within a settlement boundary and it is considered<br />
against Policies H14, T1, G1 and G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan,<br />
Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001 including Housing<br />
Amendments September <strong>2004</strong>). The relevant sections of these require<br />
that development: is of a scale, layout and design compatible with that<br />
part of the settlement in which it would be located, and would not cause<br />
harm to the character and appearance of that part of the settlement; it<br />
would not cause the loss of, or damage to, any open space which is<br />
important to the character of the settlement; any natural or built features<br />
on the site and worthy of retention have been incorporated into the<br />
scheme; and an appropriate area of private amenity space is provided<br />
for the occupiers of the dwelling-house; appropriate levels of parking<br />
are provided in accordance with the <strong>Council</strong>'s Parking Standards; and<br />
no detrimental effect results either on the amenities of the occupiers of<br />
neighbouring residential properties or highway safety result.<br />
The proposal is of a scale, layout and design in keeping with the<br />
character and appearance of the surrounding settlement, it is not<br />
112