Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council

stroud.gov.uk
from stroud.gov.uk More from this publisher
01.12.2012 Views

Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Reason: To ensure the access roads in the vicinity of the site are kept free from construction traffic, in the interests of highway safety, to accord with Policy G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). 5. Prior to the commencement of development details of parking provision to serve the site shall be submitted to and agreed in writing with the Head of Development Services. Such provision as agreed shall be provided, and made available for use prior to first occupation of the dwelling, and similarly maintained thereafter solely for the parking of vehicles. Reason: To ensure sufficient parking is provided and maintained to serve the site, in the interests of highway safety and to accord with Policy G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). 6. The development hereby permitted shall not commence until drainage works for the disposal of both surface water and foul sewage have been carried out in accordance with the details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Head of Development Services. Reason: To ensure that the development is provided with a satisfactory means of drainage as well as to reduce the risk of flooding and to minimise the risk of pollution, to accord with Policy G2 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001). Informatives: 1. For the purposes of Article 22 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) (England) (Amendment) Order 2003, the following reasons for the Council's decision are summarised below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision: The site is located within a settlement boundary and it is considered against Policies H14, T1, G1 and G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001 including Housing Amendments September 2004). The relevant sections of these require that development: is of a scale, layout and design compatible with that part of the settlement in which it would be located, and would not cause harm to the character and appearance of that part of the settlement; it would not cause the loss of, or damage to, any open space which is important to the character of the settlement; any natural or built features on the site and worthy of retention have been incorporated into the scheme; and an appropriate area of private amenity space is provided for the occupiers of the dwelling-house; appropriate levels of parking are provided in accordance with the Council's Parking Standards; and no detrimental effect results either on the amenities of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties or highway safety result. The proposal is of a scale, layout and design in keeping with the character and appearance of the surrounding settlement, it is not 112

Consultations/Representations: Parish / Town Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 important to the character of the settlement, nor are there any important features on the site worthy of retention. The area of amenity space provided is appropriate to serve the future occupiers, all in accordance with Policy H14. One parking space is provided to serve each dwelling and it would be unreasonable to require increased provision. The proposal is in accordance with Policy T1. No significant harm would result either by loss of light, loss of privacy or dominating effect on the amenities of the occupiers of neighbouring properties in accordance with Policy G1. On balance the proposal would not harm highway safety to a level where refusal would be warranted solely for this reason. The proposal is in accordance with Policy G5. 2. There is a public sewer which crosses the site. The applicant may wish to discuss with Severn Trent the implications of this and apply for its diversion. Comments: We are concerned that another house will exacerbate the congestion and parking problems. Neighbour Contributions Letters of Objection Mrs W Thickey, 63 Etheldene Road, Cashes Green Mr & Mrs Chilcott, 65 Etheldene Road, Cashes Green Anna Burns & Dale Burrell, 1 Devonia Terrace, Springfield Road R Maller, 34 Etheldene Road, Cashes Green H D & D M Legg, 3 Devonia Terrace, Springfield Road Mr T Browning, 2 Hillcrest, Springfield Road • Access opposite writers driveway. • Narrow road. • Poor services. • Increase in traffic. Difficult to park. • Increase noise. • Overcrowding and loss of privacy. • Loss of privacy and light, if built level with the footpath. Traffic problems in an already crowded area. • Passing road is narrow and creates problems accessing the site, and is too narrow to cope with the building activity. Condition on nearby property regarding site workers car park was ignored and SDC admits in practice is often unenforceable. 113

<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />

Reason:<br />

To ensure the access roads in the vicinity of the site are kept free from<br />

construction traffic, in the interests of highway safety, to accord with<br />

Policy G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as<br />

amended June 2001).<br />

5. Prior to the commencement of development details of parking provision<br />

to serve the site shall be submitted to and agreed in writing with the Head<br />

of Development Services. Such provision as agreed shall be provided,<br />

and made available for use prior to first occupation of the dwelling, and<br />

similarly maintained thereafter solely for the parking of vehicles.<br />

Reason:<br />

To ensure sufficient parking is provided and maintained to serve the site,<br />

in the interests of highway safety and to accord with Policy G5 of the<br />

<strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June<br />

2001).<br />

6. The development hereby permitted shall not commence until drainage<br />

works for the disposal of both surface water and foul sewage have been<br />

carried out in accordance with the details to be submitted to and agreed<br />

in writing by the Head of Development Services.<br />

Reason:<br />

To ensure that the development is provided with a satisfactory means of<br />

drainage as well as to reduce the risk of flooding and to minimise the risk<br />

of pollution, to accord with Policy G2 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan,<br />

Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001).<br />

Informatives:<br />

1. For the purposes of Article 22 of the Town and Country <strong>Planning</strong><br />

(General Development Procedure) (England) (Amendment) Order<br />

2003, the following reasons for the <strong>Council</strong>'s decision are summarised<br />

below together with a summary of the Policies and Proposals contained<br />

within the Development Plan which are relevant to this decision:<br />

The site is located within a settlement boundary and it is considered<br />

against Policies H14, T1, G1 and G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan,<br />

Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001 including Housing<br />

Amendments September <strong>2004</strong>). The relevant sections of these require<br />

that development: is of a scale, layout and design compatible with that<br />

part of the settlement in which it would be located, and would not cause<br />

harm to the character and appearance of that part of the settlement; it<br />

would not cause the loss of, or damage to, any open space which is<br />

important to the character of the settlement; any natural or built features<br />

on the site and worthy of retention have been incorporated into the<br />

scheme; and an appropriate area of private amenity space is provided<br />

for the occupiers of the dwelling-house; appropriate levels of parking<br />

are provided in accordance with the <strong>Council</strong>'s Parking Standards; and<br />

no detrimental effect results either on the amenities of the occupiers of<br />

neighbouring residential properties or highway safety result.<br />

The proposal is of a scale, layout and design in keeping with the<br />

character and appearance of the surrounding settlement, it is not<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!