Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 - Stroud District Council
Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 the bend. This has been caused by the existing new development because insufficient parking has been allocated - appreciate that new development complies with government guidelines on reduced parking standards but in effect they are unrealistic and lead to indiscriminate parking on other existing congested roads in the vicinity. We understand from an Environment Agency officer that the existing new development is undesirable so close to the canal side because of flooding problems - this part of the canal sometimes floods because of its bottle neck effect as it feeds into the river just further along in Frome Gardens. Further development will exacerbate this situation. Should the development be allowed, we would like to request significant contribution towards the cost of the provision of a ramp for disabled and other users of the right of way over the nearby canal footbridge (Rights of Way have commissioned drawings and are currently consulting with the EA who have no objection in principle). We note this area has already been cleared, in fact SDC Environmental Health Officer was obliged to attend the site last week because of nuisance caused by the way the developer was disposing of the debris and we hope that this time he will wait for permission to be completed before commencing building. Environment Agency The Environment Agency objects to the application as it is within an area at high risk of flooding and is not supported by a flood risk assessment that demonstrates the proposed residential development will not cut off future residents from dry land, place extra strain on emergency services and put lives at risk. Cotswold Canal Trust Object: The proposed dwellings, numbers 33 to 39 on the plan, are situated very close to the canals and will overshadow and crowd it. The canal and its surroundings are designated by your Council as an Industrial Heritage Conservation Area in order to preserve its historical structures and setting. Extending the recent modern, "out of keeping" development along this line would be totally contrary to the purpose of the IHCA. Should such an application be permitted it would be expected that a substantial Section 106 agreement should be sought to contribute to the restoration of the canal in agreement with the Canal Company, Canals Trust and British Waterways. Neighbour Contributions Letters of Objection Mr S Emery, 49 Westward Road, Stroud • Loss of privacy - any permission will breach writers rights that are protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. • Intensity of development too great for the site. • Will cause noise and nuisance. • Overbearing. • A haven for wildlife. • Will remove one of the last areas of undeveloped land on this stretch of the Stroudwater Canal. 100
Site Location: Site Report: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004 Site and Proposal The site is located in Cainscross, within the designated Industrial Heritage Conservation Area and fronting directly onto the passing canal. It is a relatively flat area covered in scrubby vegetation, with several large trees adjacent to the canal. It includes a raised "causeway" that links onto the estate road serving the neighbouring residential development to the west. The land rises rapidly at its northern end to the rear of residential properties. To both the east and the west of the site are narrow wedges of open land, beyond both of which is residential development tight onto the edge of the canal. The proposal is to erect 13 new dwellings, in the form of two, two and a half storey blocks each containing 6 apartments and one semi detached dwelling. The proposal would be linked to the adjacent estate road via the raised causeway. Planning Considerations The site is located within a defined settlement boundary and this application is considered against Policies H14, B4, T1, R8, G4, G1 & G5 of the Stroud District Local Plan, Revised Deposit Version (as amended June 2001 including Housing Amendments September 2003). The relevant sections of Policies H14 and B4 require that: proposed housing is of a scale, layout, design and in materials sympathetic to that part of the settlement in which it would be located, 101
- Page 49 and 50: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 51 and 52: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 53 and 54: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 55 and 56: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 57 and 58: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 59 and 60: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 61 and 62: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 63 and 64: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 65 and 66: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 67 and 68: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 69 and 70: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 71 and 72: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 73 and 74: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 75 and 76: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 77 and 78: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 79 and 80: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 81 and 82: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 83 and 84: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 85 and 86: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 87 and 88: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 89 and 90: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 91 and 92: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 93 and 94: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 95 and 96: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 97 and 98: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 99: ITEM No: 12 Application Site Addres
- Page 103 and 104: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 105 and 106: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 107 and 108: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 109 and 110: Planning Considerations Planning Sc
- Page 111 and 112: Site No: Parish: Planning Schedule
- Page 113 and 114: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 115 and 116: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 117 and 118: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 119 and 120: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 121 and 122: Applicant Details: Agent Details: C
- Page 123 and 124: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 125 and 126: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 127 and 128: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 129 and 130: Site Report: The site and the propo
- Page 131 and 132: Agent Details: Case Officer: Date R
- Page 133 and 134: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 135 and 136: Consultations/Representations: Neig
- Page 137 and 138: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Planning Sc
- Page 139 and 140: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 141 and 142: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
- Page 143 and 144: Consultations/Representations: Pari
- Page 145 and 146: Site Location: Site Report: Plannin
- Page 147 and 148: Case Officer: Date Received: Planni
- Page 149 and 150: Planning Schedule Date: 10/08/2004
Site Location:<br />
Site Report:<br />
<strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Schedule</strong> <strong>Date</strong>: <strong>10</strong>/<strong>08</strong>/<strong>2004</strong><br />
Site and Proposal<br />
The site is located in Cainscross, within the designated Industrial Heritage Conservation Area<br />
and fronting directly onto the passing canal. It is a relatively flat area covered in scrubby<br />
vegetation, with several large trees adjacent to the canal. It includes a raised "causeway" that<br />
links onto the estate road serving the neighbouring residential development to the west. The land<br />
rises rapidly at its northern end to the rear of residential properties. To both the east and the<br />
west of the site are narrow wedges of open land, beyond both of which is residential development<br />
tight onto the edge of the canal.<br />
The proposal is to erect 13 new dwellings, in the form of two, two and a half storey blocks each<br />
containing 6 apartments and one semi detached dwelling. The proposal would be linked to the<br />
adjacent estate road via the raised causeway.<br />
<strong>Planning</strong> Considerations<br />
The site is located within a defined settlement boundary and this application is considered<br />
against Policies H14, B4, T1, R8, G4, G1 & G5 of the <strong>Stroud</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan, Revised Deposit<br />
Version (as amended June 2001 including Housing Amendments September 2003). The<br />
relevant sections of Policies H14 and B4 require that: proposed housing is of a scale, layout,<br />
design and in materials sympathetic to that part of the settlement in which it would be located,<br />
<strong>10</strong>1
Change language