2013â2014 BIENNIAL BUDGET - the City of Tukwila
2013â2014 BIENNIAL BUDGET - the City of Tukwila 2013â2014 BIENNIAL BUDGET - the City of Tukwila
2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of Tukwila, WashingtonRevenues and expenditures are projected on the basis of assumed economic relationships. Revenues areforecast on the basis of future economic and demographic factors. Expenditures are forecast based onpast trends modified by present and future conditions. Future conditions are based upon a series ofassumptions. This model has been used to test a large range of assumptions and policy options in thecourse of developing budget recommendations.The Tukwila economy is cyclical and is still recovering from the recession that began in 2008.Unemployment is slowly declining and change in personal income is forecasted to slightly outpacechange in Seattle area CPI. Housing and construction sectors are also showing signs of recovery.However, volatility in the stock market, European and Asian economic issues, and the war on terrorismand unfunded mandates by state and federal government for criminal justice and human services haveall had an impact on the General Fund budget. Modest economic growth is reflected in the revenueforecasts through 2014 with gradual and steady improvement shown in the 2015-2018 projections. Thisforecast is relying on a 1% increase for property taxes plus an average factor for new construction.Expenditures involving public safety and public services are expected to increase at a greater rate.Commercial development, residential developments, and new annexations are a few of the areasexpected to increase the demand for public services. The Finance Department will continue to studyrevenue options and enhancements to offset any decline in future revenues and also look for costcontainment opportunities.Forecasting models have been used to assist in fiscal planning for quite some time. Models haveallowed analysis of alternative actions in funding programs during the development of the budget. Themodel accents the continuing need to control the per capita rate of expenditures reflected in thepreceding pages. Continued caution will be required to anticipate and manage the effects of currentand future legislative actions to avoid service reductions for budgetary reasons. Should growth occurslower than anticipated the adverse effect on fund balance may be greater than predicted.As mentioned, the City has taken into account the statewide initiative in forecasting property taxes.The issue that develops when property tax increases are held to 1% is that costs are not. Costs such asemployee benefits, negotiated labor contracts, services and supplies continue to increase at a greaterrate. Fuel, professional services, and healthcare costs are good examples. The shortfall then has to bemade up by increases in sales tax collection and population growth. The City has been able to maintainthe existing level of service, in light of legislative action, because the economy is growing at ratessufficient to offset the limits placed on property taxes. Sales tax revenue needs to grow at a rate that willmake up the revenues lost from property tax declines. If not, the City will then have to make somedifferent choices in the delivery of basic levels of services.Page 45
2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of Tukwila, WashingtonThis page left intentionally blank._____________________________________________________________________________________________Page 46
- Page 1: City of Tukwila, Washington2013-201
- Page 4 and 5: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 6 and 7: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 8 and 9: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 10 and 11: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 12 and 13: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 14 and 15: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 16 and 17: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 18 and 19: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 20 and 21: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 22 and 23: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 24 and 25: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 26 and 27: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 28 and 29: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 30 and 31: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 32 and 33: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 34 and 35: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 36 and 37: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 38 and 39: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 40 and 41: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 42 and 43: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 44 and 45: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 48 and 49: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 50 and 51: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 52 and 53: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 54 and 55: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 56 and 57: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 58 and 59: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 60 and 61: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 62 and 63: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 64 and 65: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 66 and 67: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 68 and 69: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 70 and 71: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 72 and 73: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 74 and 75: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 76 and 77: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 78 and 79: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 80 and 81: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 82 and 83: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 84 and 85: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 86 and 87: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 88 and 89: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 90 and 91: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 92 and 93: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
- Page 94 and 95: 2013-2014 Biennial Budget City of T
2013-2014 Biennial Budget <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tukwila</strong>, WashingtonRevenues and expenditures are projected on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> assumed economic relationships. Revenues areforecast on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> future economic and demographic factors. Expenditures are forecast based onpast trends modified by present and future conditions. Future conditions are based upon a series <strong>of</strong>assumptions. This model has been used to test a large range <strong>of</strong> assumptions and policy options in <strong>the</strong>course <strong>of</strong> developing budget recommendations.The <strong>Tukwila</strong> economy is cyclical and is still recovering from <strong>the</strong> recession that began in 2008.Unemployment is slowly declining and change in personal income is forecasted to slightly outpacechange in Seattle area CPI. Housing and construction sectors are also showing signs <strong>of</strong> recovery.However, volatility in <strong>the</strong> stock market, European and Asian economic issues, and <strong>the</strong> war on terrorismand unfunded mandates by state and federal government for criminal justice and human services haveall had an impact on <strong>the</strong> General Fund budget. Modest economic growth is reflected in <strong>the</strong> revenueforecasts through 2014 with gradual and steady improvement shown in <strong>the</strong> 2015-2018 projections. Thisforecast is relying on a 1% increase for property taxes plus an average factor for new construction.Expenditures involving public safety and public services are expected to increase at a greater rate.Commercial development, residential developments, and new annexations are a few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> areasexpected to increase <strong>the</strong> demand for public services. The Finance Department will continue to studyrevenue options and enhancements to <strong>of</strong>fset any decline in future revenues and also look for costcontainment opportunities.Forecasting models have been used to assist in fiscal planning for quite some time. Models haveallowed analysis <strong>of</strong> alternative actions in funding programs during <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget. Themodel accents <strong>the</strong> continuing need to control <strong>the</strong> per capita rate <strong>of</strong> expenditures reflected in <strong>the</strong>preceding pages. Continued caution will be required to anticipate and manage <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> currentand future legislative actions to avoid service reductions for budgetary reasons. Should growth occurslower than anticipated <strong>the</strong> adverse effect on fund balance may be greater than predicted.As mentioned, <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> has taken into account <strong>the</strong> statewide initiative in forecasting property taxes.The issue that develops when property tax increases are held to 1% is that costs are not. Costs such asemployee benefits, negotiated labor contracts, services and supplies continue to increase at a greaterrate. Fuel, pr<strong>of</strong>essional services, and healthcare costs are good examples. The shortfall <strong>the</strong>n has to bemade up by increases in sales tax collection and population growth. The <strong>City</strong> has been able to maintain<strong>the</strong> existing level <strong>of</strong> service, in light <strong>of</strong> legislative action, because <strong>the</strong> economy is growing at ratessufficient to <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong> limits placed on property taxes. Sales tax revenue needs to grow at a rate that willmake up <strong>the</strong> revenues lost from property tax declines. If not, <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> will <strong>the</strong>n have to make somedifferent choices in <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> basic levels <strong>of</strong> services.Page 45