12.07.2015 Views

2013–2014 BIENNIAL BUDGET - the City of Tukwila

2013–2014 BIENNIAL BUDGET - the City of Tukwila

2013–2014 BIENNIAL BUDGET - the City of Tukwila

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2013-2014 Biennial Budget <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tukwila</strong>, WashingtonFINANCIAL POLICIESThe <strong>City</strong>’s Financial Policies are intended to serve as a Council-approved set <strong>of</strong> values and expectationsfor Council Members, <strong>City</strong> staff, citizens and o<strong>the</strong>r interested parties who may do business with <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong>.The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term “<strong>City</strong>” refers to all <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials and staff who are responsible for <strong>the</strong> activities tocarry out <strong>the</strong>se policies. The policies describe expectations for financial planning, budgeting, accounting,reporting and o<strong>the</strong>r management practices. They have been prepared to assure prudent financialmanagement and responsible stewardship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong>’s financial and physical resources.Debt PoliciesThe Debt Policies can be segregated into three areas: Legal Debt limits, Practical or Fiscal limits andGeneral Debt policies.A. Legal Debt Limit – The Revised Code <strong>of</strong> Washington (RCW 39.36) establishes <strong>the</strong> legaldebt limits for cities. Specifically, this RCW provides that debt cannot be incurred inexcess <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following percentages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxable property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong>: 1.5%without a vote <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people; 2.5% with a vote <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people; 5.0% with a vote <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>people, provided <strong>the</strong> indebtedness in excess <strong>of</strong> 2.5% is for utilities; and 7.5% with a vote<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people, provided <strong>the</strong> indebtedness in excess <strong>of</strong> 5.0% is for parks or open spacedevelopment.Policy DP-1 - Prior to issuing any long-term bonds, <strong>the</strong> Administration must provide animpact analysis over <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new bonds. Bond issues must be approved by <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong>Council.B. Practical or Fiscal Limitations – More important than <strong>the</strong> legal limitations is <strong>the</strong> practicalor fiscal limitations, i.e. ability to repay borrowed funds.Policy DP-2 – Long-term debt cannot be issued prior to reviewing <strong>the</strong> impact on <strong>the</strong> SixYear Planning Model and its policy guidelines. The impact <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r potential bond issuesshall be considered.Policy DP-3 – Fiscal Policy for large developments is in process <strong>of</strong> development.C. General Debt PoliciesPolicy DP-4 – The <strong>City</strong> will be cognizant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> criteria used by rating agencies tomaintain <strong>the</strong> highest possible bond rating.Policy DP-5 – Assessment Debt (LID) shall be considered as an alternative to GeneralDebt.Policy DP-6 – Debt issuance will conform to IRS regulations and avoid arbitrageconsequences._____________________________________________________________________________________________Page 38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!