12.07.2015 Views

395 - GSA Development of St. Elizabeths Campus

395 - GSA Development of St. Elizabeths Campus

395 - GSA Development of St. Elizabeths Campus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Campus</strong>. The West Access Road would have 2 lanes inbound and 1 lane outboundbetween the Gate 4 and the Firth <strong>St</strong>erling Avenue intersection.• The northern terminus <strong>of</strong> the West <strong>Campus</strong> Access Road with Firth <strong>St</strong>erling Avenuewould be re-configured into a three-leg signalized intersection as described in therevised Record <strong>of</strong> Decision (September 28, 2011) issued for the Tier I EIS associated withthe West <strong>Campus</strong>.• Existing streetcar tracks on Firth <strong>St</strong>erling Avenue remain unchanged.• Existing width <strong>of</strong> Firth <strong>St</strong>erling Avenue remains unchanged.• Back alley along the property line <strong>of</strong> Barry Farms would connect to the West <strong>Campus</strong>Access Road.• A bike path running along the eastern side <strong>of</strong> the West <strong>Campus</strong> Access Road, thenheading west along the southern side <strong>of</strong> Firth <strong>St</strong>erling Avenue and continuing ontoSouth Capitol <strong>St</strong>reet.• Approximately 10 parallel or saw-tooth bus bays providing service to the West <strong>Campus</strong>along the West <strong>Campus</strong> Access Road between Gates 4 and 6.• MLK Jr. Avenue Improvements. The current configuration <strong>of</strong> MLK Jr. Avenue is four 10-foot-wide lanes and two 5-foot-wide sidewalks. MLK Jr. Avenue would be widened toaccommodate turning lanes into gates on the West <strong>Campus</strong>. The widening would occuron the eastern side <strong>of</strong> MLK Jr. Avenue and require land from the <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Elizabeths</strong> East<strong>Campus</strong> (<strong>GSA</strong> 2008a).• All other freeway and arterial projects assumed in the No Build Alternative are assumedto be constructed under the No Action Alternative.• The traffic operation analysis for No Action Alternative is provided in Section 5.5 <strong>of</strong> thisdocument.2.4.5 Future Needs2.4.5.1 FreewayThe future needs for a freeway network that will sufficiently accommodate baseline traffic plusadditional DHS-generated trips are summarized as follows:• Capacity enhancements at freeway ramps terminals and local network interfaces thatminimize environmental impacts• Lane balance and lane continuity between interchanges• Resolution <strong>of</strong> design deficiencies to meet current standards so that these location do notcompromise safety• Accessibility and connectivity at junctions with the local transportation network;completion <strong>of</strong> missing turn movements2-14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!