12.07.2015 Views

124 Interest of Promoters and Directors Except as stated ... - Edelweiss

124 Interest of Promoters and Directors Except as stated ... - Edelweiss

124 Interest of Promoters and Directors Except as stated ... - Edelweiss

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Interest</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Directors</strong><strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> otherwise in this Prospectus, none <strong>of</strong> the beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> loans, <strong>and</strong> advances <strong>and</strong> sundry debtorsare related to the <strong>Directors</strong> or <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company.The remuneration <strong>of</strong> our Promoter Director, Mr. Ajay Gupta includes commission payable at the rate <strong>of</strong> 2.5% <strong>of</strong> theaudited pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax (for the financial year adjusted for commission) <strong>of</strong> the Company. For further detailsregarding the interest <strong>of</strong> <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> in the Company refer to the section “Related Party Transactions”<strong>and</strong> “Financial Statement” beginning on pages 154 <strong>and</strong> F-1 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.The Company acquired ownership <strong>of</strong> the M<strong>and</strong>la Factory in 2008 from Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, acompany belonging to our Promoter Group under the Scheme <strong>of</strong> De-Merger sanctioned in 2008 by the BIFR.Further, the Company h<strong>as</strong> le<strong>as</strong>ed the Registered Office from Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors, a Promoter Group firm in which ourPromoter Director, Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, is a partner with 20% share <strong>and</strong> the Corporate Office from CommercialAutomobiles Private Limited, one <strong>of</strong> our Group Companies. For further details regarding the properties acquired <strong>and</strong>le<strong>as</strong>ed by the Company refer to the section “History <strong>and</strong> Certain Corporate Matters” beginning on page 105 <strong>of</strong> thisProspectus. <strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> disclosed in the sections “Financial Statements” <strong>and</strong> “Related Party Transactions” beginningon pages F-1 <strong>and</strong> 154 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus, the <strong>Directors</strong> have no interest in any property acquired by the Companywithin two years <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.The <strong>Directors</strong> may also be regarded <strong>as</strong> interested in the Equity Shares, if any, held by them or that may besubscribed by or allotted to the companies, firms, trusts, in which they are interested <strong>as</strong> directors, members, partners,trustees <strong>and</strong> promoters, pursuant to this Issue. All <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Directors</strong> may also be deemed to be interested to the extent<strong>of</strong> any dividend payable to them <strong>and</strong> other distributions in respect <strong>of</strong> the said Equity Shares.<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> disclosed in the section “Financial Statements” beginning on page F-1 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus <strong>and</strong> to the extent<strong>of</strong> their shareholding in the Company, the <strong>Directors</strong> do not have any other interest in our business.Corporate GovernanceThe provisions <strong>of</strong> the listing agreements to be entered into with the Stock Exchanges with respect to corporategovernance become applicable to the Company at the time <strong>of</strong> seeking in-principle approval <strong>of</strong> the Stock Exchanges.The Company h<strong>as</strong> complied with such provisions, including with respect to the appointment <strong>of</strong> independent<strong>Directors</strong> to the Board <strong>and</strong> the constitution <strong>of</strong> the following committees <strong>of</strong> the Board: the Audit Committee, theRemuneration Committee, Investors Grievance Committee, the Share Transfer Committee <strong>and</strong> the IPO Committee.The Company shall comply with all the requirements <strong>of</strong> the guidelines on corporate governance <strong>as</strong> per Clause 49 <strong>of</strong>the listing agreement to be entered into with the Stock Exchanges, <strong>as</strong> would be applicable to the Company upon thelisting <strong>of</strong> its Equity Shares.The Board h<strong>as</strong> six <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Board is an Executive Director. Therefore, in compliance withthe requirements <strong>of</strong> Clause 49 <strong>of</strong> the Listing Agreement, the Company h<strong>as</strong> (i) 4 Non-Executive <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>and</strong> (ii) atle<strong>as</strong>t 3 Independent <strong>Directors</strong> on the Board.Audit CommitteeThe Audit Committee w<strong>as</strong> constituted by the Board at its meeting held on January 10, 2010. The purpose <strong>of</strong> theAudit Committee is to ensure compliance with the internal control systems <strong>of</strong> the Company <strong>and</strong> to review the halfyearly<strong>and</strong> annual financial statements <strong>of</strong> the Company.The constitution <strong>of</strong> the reconstituted Audit Committee is <strong>as</strong> follows:S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> the Director Executive/Non-executive/Independent1. Mr. Sevanti Lal Popatlal Shah Non-Executive, Independent Director2. Mr. Arun Kumar Rao Non-Executive, Independent Director3. Mr. Bharat Bakhshi Non-Executive, Nominee Director <strong>of</strong> NYLIM<strong>124</strong>


Under the Tata Growth Fund Agreement, Tata Trustee will nominate a director for appointment to our Board within90 days <strong>of</strong> July 29, 2010. Thereupon, the nominee <strong>of</strong> Tata Trustee will replace Mr. Bharat Bakhshi on the AuditCommittee for a term <strong>of</strong> 12 months. The nominee director <strong>of</strong> Tata Trustee <strong>and</strong> NYLIM will sit on the AuditCommittee for alternating periods <strong>of</strong> 12 months (till such time <strong>as</strong> Tata Trustee <strong>and</strong> NYLIM are entitled to nominate<strong>Directors</strong> to our Board, for details <strong>of</strong> which refer to the section “History <strong>and</strong> Certain Corporate Matters” beginningon page 105 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.The terms <strong>of</strong> reference <strong>of</strong> the Audit Committee are <strong>as</strong> follows:Regular review <strong>of</strong> accounts, accounting policies <strong>and</strong> disclosures.Review the major accounting entries b<strong>as</strong>ed on exercise <strong>of</strong> judgment by management <strong>and</strong> review <strong>of</strong> significantadjustments arising out <strong>of</strong> audit.Review any qualifications in the draft audit report.Establish <strong>and</strong> review the scope <strong>of</strong> the independent audit including the observations <strong>of</strong> the auditors <strong>and</strong> review <strong>of</strong>the quarterly, half-yearly <strong>and</strong> annual financial statements before submission to the Board.Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the audit, attend discussions with the independent auditors to <strong>as</strong>certain any area <strong>of</strong> concern.Establish the scope <strong>and</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> the internal audit, review the findings <strong>of</strong> the internal auditors <strong>and</strong> ensurethe adequacy <strong>of</strong> internal control systems.Examine re<strong>as</strong>ons for substantial defaults in payment to depositors, debenture holders, shareholders <strong>and</strong>creditors.Examine matters relating to the Director’s Responsibility Statement for compliance with Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards<strong>and</strong> accounting policies.Oversee compliance with Stock Exchange legal requirements concerning financial statements, to the extentapplicable.Examine any related party transactions, i.e., transactions <strong>of</strong> the Company that are <strong>of</strong> a material nature withpromoters or management, their subsidiaries, relatives, etc., that may have potential conflict with the interests <strong>of</strong> theCompany.Appointment <strong>and</strong> remuneration <strong>of</strong> statutory <strong>and</strong> internal auditors.Such other matters <strong>as</strong> may from time to time be required under any statutory, contractual or other regulatoryrequirement.Monitoring <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> the Net Proceeds <strong>of</strong> the Fresh IssueUtilisation <strong>of</strong> the Net Proceeds <strong>of</strong> the Fresh Issue shall be placed before the Audit Committee for consideration<strong>and</strong> approval <strong>as</strong> per disclosure requirements under the listing agreement with the Stock Exchanges.Remuneration CommitteeThe Remuneration Committee w<strong>as</strong> constituted by the Board at its meeting held on January 10, 2010. The objective<strong>of</strong> the Remuneration Committee is to ensure that the Company’s remuneration policies in respect <strong>of</strong> ManagingDirector, Whole-time Director, senior executives are competitive such that the Company is able to recruit <strong>and</strong> retainthe best talent <strong>and</strong> to ensure appropriate disclosure <strong>of</strong> remuneration paid to such persons.The constitution <strong>of</strong> the Remuneration Committee is <strong>as</strong> follows:S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> the Director Executive/Non-executive/Independent1. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Vadhera Additional Non-Executive, Independent Director2. Mr. Arun Kumar Rao Non-Executive, Independent Director3. Mr. Bharat Bakhshi Non-Executive, Nominee Director <strong>of</strong> NYLIMThe terms <strong>of</strong> reference <strong>of</strong> the reconstituted Remuneration Committee are <strong>as</strong> follows:• Determine the remuneration, review performance <strong>and</strong> decide on variable pay <strong>of</strong> executive <strong>Directors</strong>.• Establish <strong>and</strong> administer employee compensation <strong>and</strong> benefit plans.• Determine the number <strong>of</strong> stock options to be granted under the Company’s Employees Stock Option Schemes<strong>and</strong> administer any stock option plan.• Such other matters <strong>as</strong> may from time to time be required under any statutory, contractual or other regulatoryrequirement.125


Under the Tata Growth Fund Agreement, Tata Trustee will nominate a director for appointment to our Board within90 days <strong>of</strong> July 29, 2010. Thereupon, the nominee <strong>of</strong> Tata Trustee will also be given a seat on the RemunerationCommittee.Investor Grievance CommitteeThe Investor Grievance Committee w<strong>as</strong> constituted by the Board at its meeting held on January 10, 2010. TheInvestor Grievance Committee is responsible for addressing investors’ or shareholders’ grievances, for example, nonreceipt <strong>of</strong> share certificates after transfer, loss <strong>of</strong> share certificates, dividend related issues <strong>and</strong> matters connectedtherewith.The constitution <strong>of</strong> the Investor Grievance Committee is <strong>as</strong> follows:S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> the Director Executive/Non-executive/Independent1. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta Chairman cum Managing Director2. Mr. Sevanti Lal Popatlal Shah Non-Executive, Independent Director3. Mr. Arun Kumar Rao Non-Executive, Independent DirectorThe terms <strong>of</strong> reference <strong>of</strong> the Investor Grievance Committee are <strong>as</strong> follows:• Supervise investor relations <strong>and</strong> redressal <strong>of</strong> investor grievance in general <strong>and</strong> relating to non-receipt <strong>of</strong>dividends, interest, <strong>and</strong> non-receipt <strong>of</strong> balance sheet in particular.• Such other matters <strong>as</strong> may from time to time be required under any statutory, contractual or other regulatoryrequirement.Share Transfer CommitteeThe Share Transfer Committee w<strong>as</strong> constituted by the Board at its meeting held on January 10, 2010. The ShareTransfer Committee is responsible for all decisions in relation to the transfer/transmission/split/consolidation <strong>of</strong> theshares <strong>of</strong> the company.The constitution <strong>of</strong> the Share Transfer Committee is <strong>as</strong> follows:S. No. Name <strong>of</strong> the member Executive/Non-executive/Independent1. Mr. Ajay Gupta Whole Time Executive Director2. Mr. Sevanti Lal Popatlal Shah Non-Executive, Independent Director3. Mr. Arun Kumar Rao Non-Executive, Independent DirectorThe terms <strong>of</strong> reference <strong>of</strong> the Share Transfer Committee are <strong>as</strong> follows:• Approve <strong>and</strong> register the transfer or transmission <strong>of</strong> the Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> the Company.• Sub divide/split, consolidate <strong>and</strong> or replace any share certificates <strong>of</strong> the Company including issue <strong>of</strong> duplicateshare certificates.• Authorise affixation <strong>of</strong> Common Seal <strong>of</strong> the Company to share certificates.• Provide for the safe custody <strong>of</strong> the Common Seal <strong>of</strong> the Company.• Do all other acts <strong>and</strong> deeds <strong>as</strong> may be necessary <strong>and</strong> incidental to these terms <strong>of</strong> reference.126


MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTUREWhole –TimeExecutive DirectorMr. Ajay GuptaExecutive VicePresidentMr. Abhishek JaiswalExecutive Vice President(Railways)Mr. Pradeep GuptaCompany SecretaryMr. Anurag MisraChief FinanceOfficerMr. Abhijit KanvindeSenior General Manager(Railways <strong>and</strong> NewBusiness Development)Mr. Atul N. KarmarkarSenior General Manager(Railways <strong>and</strong> BusinessDevelopment)Mr. Rajiv Malhotra128


Key Management PersonnelThe key management personnel <strong>of</strong> our Company are <strong>as</strong> follows:Mr. Abhijit Kanvinde, Chief Finance OfficerMr. Abhijit Kanvinde is 45 years old <strong>and</strong> is the Chief Finance Officer <strong>of</strong> our Company. He is a commerce graduate<strong>and</strong> a qualified Chartered Accountant. He h<strong>as</strong> over 18 years <strong>of</strong> experience in the fields <strong>of</strong> finance, accounts,taxation <strong>and</strong> insurance management. He h<strong>as</strong> worked with numerous companies including Shringar Cinem<strong>as</strong>Limited, Novartis Consumer Health India Pvt. Ltd., L’Oreal, <strong>and</strong> Mafatlal Dyes <strong>and</strong> Chemicals Ltd. In ourCompany, he is responsible for the preparation <strong>of</strong> operational budgets, supervision <strong>and</strong> finalization <strong>of</strong> corporateaccounts <strong>and</strong> statutory audits, direct <strong>and</strong> indirect taxation, sector insurance <strong>and</strong> internal audit functions. He joinedour Company on January 15, 2007. The gross remuneration paid to him during fiscal year 2010 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 1.81million. Key details <strong>of</strong> his contract <strong>of</strong> employment with the Company are <strong>as</strong> follows: (a) The employment is on anexclusive b<strong>as</strong>is; (b) The contract can be terminated by either party by giving two months notice in writing; (c)employee is prohibited from divulging trade secrets <strong>and</strong> other facts <strong>and</strong> information relating to the Companyduring the tenure <strong>of</strong> employment.Mr. Abhishek Jaiswal, Executive Vice PresidentMr. Abhishek Jaiswal is 40 years old <strong>and</strong> is the Executive Vice President <strong>of</strong> our Company. He holds a graduatedegree in Production Engineering <strong>and</strong> h<strong>as</strong> over 16 years <strong>of</strong> experience, <strong>and</strong> w<strong>as</strong> previously employed <strong>as</strong> a PlanningEngineer (Welding Shop) with Kinetic Honda from June, 1990 to March, 1993. He is responsible for overalloperations <strong>of</strong> all units <strong>of</strong> the Company <strong>and</strong> he functionally oversees production, robotic welding, press shop <strong>and</strong>CNC machine operations. He joined our Company in March, 1993. The gross remuneration paid to him duringfiscal year 2010 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 1.72 million. Key details <strong>of</strong> his contract <strong>of</strong> employment with the Company are <strong>as</strong> follows:(a) The employment is on an exclusive b<strong>as</strong>is; (b) The contract can be terminated by either party by giving twomonths notice in writing; (c) employee is prohibited from divulging trade secrets <strong>and</strong> other facts <strong>and</strong> informationrelating to the Company during the tenure <strong>of</strong> employment.Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Executive Vice President (Railways)Mr. Pradeep Gupta is 59 years old <strong>and</strong> is the Executive Vice President (Railways) <strong>of</strong> our Company. He holds agraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering. He h<strong>as</strong> over 30 years <strong>of</strong> experience in project management,manufacturing, marketing, product engineering, quality <strong>as</strong>surance, vendor development <strong>and</strong> export execution in therailway industry. He w<strong>as</strong> previously employed with the OMBESCO Group from January, 2005 to January, 2009.He is responsible for looking after our projects in the railway division. He joined our Company on January 14,2010. The gross remuneration paid to him during fiscal year 2010 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 0.40 million. Key details <strong>of</strong> his contract<strong>of</strong> employment with the Company are <strong>as</strong> follows: (a) The employment is on an exclusive b<strong>as</strong>is; (b) The contractcan be terminated by either party by giving two months notice in writing; (c) employee is prohibited fromdivulging trade secrets <strong>and</strong> other facts <strong>and</strong> information relating to the Company during the tenure <strong>of</strong> employment.Mr. Atul Nagesh Karmarkar, Senior General Manager (Railways <strong>and</strong> New Business Development)Mr. Atul Nagesh Karmarkar is 41 years old <strong>and</strong> is the Senior General Manager, Railways <strong>and</strong> New BusinessDevelopment, <strong>of</strong> our Company. He holds a diploma in Mechanical Engineering, <strong>and</strong> an MBA in Marketing. He isa certified internal auditor for QS 14001 <strong>and</strong> TS 16949. He h<strong>as</strong> over 17 years <strong>of</strong> experience in production planning<strong>and</strong> control. He w<strong>as</strong> previously employed with Pinnacle Industries Ltd. <strong>as</strong> Senior Manager-Production fromAugust, 2005 to June, 2008. He is responsible for all in-house production <strong>and</strong> planning activities <strong>and</strong> stream-liningprocesses <strong>and</strong> procedures. He also manages the Company’s service teams in six warehouses across the country. Hejoined our Company on June 15, 2008. The gross remuneration paid to him during fiscal year 2010 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 1.18million. Key details <strong>of</strong> his contract <strong>of</strong> employment with the Company are <strong>as</strong> follows: (a) The employment is on anexclusive b<strong>as</strong>is; (b) The contract can be terminated by either party by giving two months notice in writing; (c)employee prohibited from divulging trade secrets <strong>and</strong> other facts <strong>and</strong> information relating to the Company duringthe tenure <strong>of</strong> employment.129


Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Senior General Manager (Railways <strong>and</strong> Business Development)Mr. Rajiv Malhotra is 40 years old <strong>and</strong> is the Senior General Manager (Railways <strong>and</strong> Business Development) <strong>of</strong>our Company. He holds a graduate degree in Mechanical Engineering. He h<strong>as</strong> over 17 years <strong>of</strong> experience inproduction, product development <strong>and</strong> project designs. He w<strong>as</strong> previously employed with Hindalco IndustriesLimited from December, 1992 to June, 1996. He is in charge <strong>of</strong> marketing for railways <strong>and</strong> our business withDLW. He is also in charge <strong>of</strong> our operations for production, robotic welding, press shop, CNC bending, punchingfabrication <strong>and</strong> <strong>as</strong>sembly. He joined our Company on July 1, 1996. The gross remuneration paid to him duringfiscal year 2010 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 1.28 million. Key details <strong>of</strong> his contract <strong>of</strong> employment with the Company are <strong>as</strong> follows:(a) The employment is on an exclusive b<strong>as</strong>is; (b) The contract can be terminated by either party by giving twomonths notice in writing; (c) employee prohibited from divulging trade secrets <strong>and</strong> other facts <strong>and</strong> informationrelating to the Company during the tenure <strong>of</strong> employment.Mr. Anurag Misra, Company SecretaryMr. Anurag Misra is 34 years old <strong>and</strong> is the Company Secretary <strong>of</strong> our Company. He holds a post graduate degreein commerce <strong>and</strong> is an <strong>as</strong>sociate member <strong>of</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Company Secretaries <strong>of</strong> India (ICSI). He h<strong>as</strong> over 7 years<strong>of</strong> experience in secretarial practices <strong>and</strong> legal compliance working with the Company. He is responsible forlooking after secretarial, legal <strong>and</strong> other statutory compliances <strong>of</strong> the Company. His other responsibilities alsoinclude managing the finances <strong>of</strong> the Company, managing mergers <strong>and</strong> acquisitions, <strong>and</strong> joint ventures. He joinedour Company in January, 2003. The gross remuneration paid to him during fiscal year 2010 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 0.6 million.Key details <strong>of</strong> his contract <strong>of</strong> employment with the Company are <strong>as</strong> follows: (a) The employment is on anexclusive b<strong>as</strong>is; (b) The contract can be terminated by either party by giving two months notice in writing; (c)employee is prohibited from divulging trade secrets <strong>and</strong> other facts <strong>and</strong> information relating to the Company duringthe tenure <strong>of</strong> employment.All the key management personnel mentioned above are permanent employees <strong>of</strong> the Company.None <strong>of</strong> our key management personnel are related to each other.None <strong>of</strong> our key management personnel have any interest in the Company apart from their remuneration.None <strong>of</strong> our key management personnel w<strong>as</strong> selected pursuant to any arrangement or underst<strong>and</strong>ing with any <strong>of</strong>our major shareholders, customers, suppliers or other parties.Shareholding <strong>of</strong> key management personnelNone <strong>of</strong> our key management personnel hold any equity shares in the Company apart from their remuneration.Bonus or pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing plan for the key management personnelThere is no bonus or pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing plan for key management personnel <strong>of</strong> the Company .Employee Stock Option Plan / Employee Stock Purch<strong>as</strong>e SchemeWe do not have any employee stock option scheme <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus .Changes in the Key Management PersonnelThe following are the changes in the key management personnel <strong>of</strong> the Company in the l<strong>as</strong>t three years precedingthe date <strong>of</strong> filing this Prospectus:S. NameDate <strong>of</strong>DesignationDate <strong>of</strong> Re<strong>as</strong>onNo.AppointmentCessation1. Mr. Pradeep January 14, Executive Vice President- AppointmentGupta2010(Railways)2. Mr. Atul Nagesh June 15, 2008 Senior General Manager (Railways - Appointment130


S.No.NameKarmarkarDate <strong>of</strong>AppointmentDesignation<strong>and</strong> New Business Development)Date <strong>of</strong>CessationRe<strong>as</strong>onPayment or Benefit to Officers <strong>of</strong> the Company<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> disclosed in this Prospectus <strong>and</strong> any statutory payments made by the Company in the l<strong>as</strong>t two years, theCompany h<strong>as</strong> not paid any sum to its employees in connection with superannuation payments <strong>and</strong> ex-gratia orrewards <strong>and</strong> h<strong>as</strong> not paid any non-salary amount or benefit to any <strong>of</strong> its <strong>of</strong>ficers.<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> disclosed in this Prospectus, none <strong>of</strong> the beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> loans <strong>and</strong> advances <strong>and</strong> sundry debtors arerelated to the <strong>Directors</strong> or the <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company.131


OUR PROMOTERS, GROUP COMPANIES AND PROMOTER GROUP<strong>Promoters</strong>The following are the <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company:1. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta2. Mr. Ajay Gupta<strong>Promoters</strong>’ DetailsThe details <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Promoters</strong> are <strong>as</strong> follows:Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h GuptaIdentificationDetailsAge 63Residential Address486, South Civil Lines, Pachpedi, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh482101, India.Voter ID NumberMP/25/194/027374Driving License NumberNot applied forDesignation Chairman cum Managing Director w.e.f May 26, 2010Educational qualifications <strong>and</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>essional experienceSee the section “Our Management” beginning on page 120 <strong>of</strong> thisProspectusOther <strong>Directors</strong>hipsSee the section “Our Management” beginning on page 120 <strong>of</strong> thisProspectusDr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta owns 12,644,800 Equity Shares, representing 29.48% <strong>of</strong> the pre-Issue share capital <strong>and</strong> 23.01%<strong>of</strong> the post-Issue share capital <strong>of</strong> the Company. He also holds <strong>as</strong> representative <strong>of</strong> the Promoter Group pursuant tothe Scheme <strong>of</strong> De-Merger 980 Equity Shares, representing less than 0.0 percent <strong>of</strong> the pre-Issue share capital <strong>and</strong>less than 0.0 percent <strong>of</strong> the post-Issue share capital <strong>of</strong> the Company.Mr. Ajay GuptaIdentificationDetailsAge 38Residential Address486, South Civil Lines, Pachpedi, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh482101, IndiaVoter ID NumberNot applied forDriving License NumberMH-01-90-23675DesignationWhole-Time Executive Director, appointed <strong>as</strong> Additional Directorby the Board on October 1, 2005 <strong>and</strong> confirmed by the shareholdersin general meeting on September 29, 2006.132


IdentificationEducational qualifications <strong>and</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>essional experienceOther <strong>Directors</strong>hipsDetailsSee the section “Our Management” beginning on page 120 <strong>of</strong> thisProspectusSee the section “Our Management” beginning on page 120 <strong>of</strong> thisProspectusMr. Ajay Gupta owns 11,281,270 Equity Shares, representing 26.30% <strong>of</strong> the pre-Issue share capital <strong>and</strong> 20.53% <strong>of</strong>the post-Issue share capital <strong>of</strong> the Company.Promoter GroupThe following natural persons, HUFs, companies <strong>and</strong> partnership firms, other than the <strong>Promoters</strong> named above,constitute our promoter group <strong>as</strong> defined under the ICDR Regulations (the “Promoter Group”):The natural persons who are part <strong>of</strong> the Promoter Group, are <strong>as</strong> follows:Immediate Relatives <strong>of</strong> Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta1. Ms. Rekha Gupta (wife)2. Mr. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra Gupta (brother)3. Mr. Manik Ch<strong>and</strong>ra Gupta (brother)4. Mr. Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta (brother)5. Mr. Arun Gupta (brother)6. Late Mr. Kapoor Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta (brother)7. Ms. Angoori Devi Goel (sister)8. Ms. Shakuntala Gupta (sister)9. Ms. Nirmala Bansal (sister)10. Ms. Manju Agrawal (sister)11. Ms. Shalini Gupta (daughter)12. Ms. N<strong>and</strong>ini Malpani (daughter)13. Ms. Anubha Bhartia (daughter)14. Late Mr. Prem Narayan Agarwal (wife’s father)15. Late Ms. K<strong>as</strong>turi Devi (wife’s mother)16. Mr. Indraprak<strong>as</strong>h Agarwal (wife’s brother)17. Mr. B<strong>as</strong>ant Kumar Agarwal (wife’s brother)18. Mr. Rajan Kumar Agarwal (wife’s brother)19. Ms. Sh<strong>as</strong>hi Singhal (wife’s sister)Immediate Relatives <strong>of</strong> Mr. Ajay Gupta1. Late Mr. Gopal Gupta (father)2. Ms. Asha Devi Gupta (mother)3. Mr. Aditya Gupta (brother)4. Ms. Anita Bharatiya (sister)5. Mr. Shrivardhan Gupta (son)6. Mr. Aniruddha Gupta (son)7. Ms. Shalini Gupta (wife)8. Ms. N<strong>and</strong>ini Malpani (wife’s sister)9. Ms. Anubha Bhartia (wife’s sister)10. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta (wife’s father)11. Ms. Rekha Gupta (wife’s mother)HUFs that are part <strong>of</strong> the Promoter Group are <strong>as</strong> follows:1. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta Hindu Undivided Family2. Ajay Gupta Hindu Undivided Family133


3. JN Gupta & Sons Hindu Undivided Family4. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra & Brothers Hindu Undivided Family5. Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Ch<strong>and</strong> Hindu Undivided Family6. Manik Ch<strong>and</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Ch<strong>and</strong> Hindu Undivided Family7. Jai Narain Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong> Manik Ch<strong>and</strong> Kapoor Ch<strong>and</strong> Hindu Undivided Family8. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong> Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Hindu Undivided Family9. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra Hindu Undivided Family10. Manik Ch<strong>and</strong>ra Hindu Undivided Family11. Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta Hindu Undivided FamilyTrusts that are part <strong>of</strong> the Promoter Group are <strong>as</strong> follows:1. Jai Narayan Charitable Trust2. J<strong>as</strong>hn Beneficiary TrustCompanies that are part <strong>of</strong> the Promoter Group are <strong>as</strong> follows:1. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited2. J.N. Auto Private Limited3. Commercial Automobiles Private Limited4. Shivam Motors (P) Limited5. Shubham Multi Services Private Limited6. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser Industries Private Limited7. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance Private Limited8. Shivam Phoenix Transport Services Private Limited9. Narmada Auto Care Services Private Limited10. Commercial Motors (Dehradun) Private Limited11. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors (Private) Limited12. Commercial Cars Private Limited13. Tirupati Services Limited14. Tirupati Services (Dehradun) Private Limited15. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited16. Kail<strong>as</strong>h ShinMaywa Industries Limited17. Commercial Auto (Dehradun) Private Limited18. Commercial Treads Private Limited19. Vineet Capital Services (P) Limited20. Tirupati Equipments Private Limited21. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders (P) Limited22. Commercial Motor Sales Private LimitedFirms that are part <strong>of</strong> the Promoter Group are <strong>as</strong> follows:1. Commercial Instalment2. Commercial Body Builders3. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders4. Eur<strong>of</strong>ibre India5. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Finance Company Kanpur6. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors7. Ch<strong>and</strong>ra Brothers8. Commercial Motors Bareilly9. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Company Kanpur10. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobiles11. Commercial Auto Centre12. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Centre Kanpur134


Companies <strong>and</strong> Firms forming part <strong>of</strong> our Group Companies:The following companies, firms <strong>and</strong> ventures have been promoted by the <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company <strong>and</strong> arereferred to in this Prospectus <strong>as</strong> the “Group Companies”. The Group Companies are companies, firms <strong>and</strong>ventures in which the <strong>Promoters</strong> (i) exercise control; or (ii) have been named <strong>as</strong> promoters by such entity in anyfiling with the stock exchanges in India. We define “control” (<strong>as</strong> per the terms <strong>of</strong> the ICDR Regulations) <strong>as</strong> the(a) ownership, directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, <strong>of</strong> 50% or more <strong>of</strong> the equity share capital or votinginterest <strong>of</strong> the entity; or (b) power to appoint the majority <strong>of</strong> the directors or similar governing body <strong>of</strong> suchentity; or (c) power to control the management or policy decisions <strong>of</strong> the entity, directly or indirectly, includingthrough the exercise <strong>of</strong> shareholding or management or similar rights or voting arrangements or in any othermanner. Joint ventures in which any Promoter is a joint venture partner have been disclosed <strong>as</strong> GroupCompanies, even where the Promoter holds less than 50% <strong>of</strong> the equity share capital or voting interest <strong>of</strong> therelevant joint venture. In addition, if a Promoter in practice controls an entity owing to the other shareholders orpartners not actively participating in the business <strong>of</strong> the entity, such entity h<strong>as</strong> been included <strong>as</strong> a GroupCompany.B<strong>as</strong>ed on the above, our Group Companies are set forth below:Companies1. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited2. Shivam Motors Private Limited3. Shubham Multi Services Private Limited4. Commercial Automobiles Private Limited5. J.N. Auto Private Limited6. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance Private Limited7. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser Industries Private Limited8. Shivam Phoenix Transport Services Private Limited9. Narmada Auto Care Services Private LimitedFirms1. Commercial Instalment2. Commercial Body Builders3. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders4. Eur<strong>of</strong>ibre IndiaExcluded Entities <strong>of</strong> Immediate RelativesNo information is available with the Company, the <strong>Promoters</strong> or their other Immediate Relatives about thecompanies, firms, HUFs or trusts <strong>of</strong> the Immediate Relatives specified below. Further, none <strong>of</strong> these individuals<strong>and</strong> the Company or any Promoter or any <strong>of</strong> their other Immediate Relatives have any common interest, whetherdirectly or indirectly, in any companies, firms, HUFs or trusts. Therefore, companies, firms, HUFs or trusts, if anyin which the individuals specified below have interests, are not included in the above list <strong>of</strong> Promoter Groupentities:(1) The daughters <strong>and</strong> sisters <strong>of</strong> Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta: Ms. Angoori Devi Goel (sister), Ms. Shakuntala Gupta(sister), Ms. Nirmala Bansal (sister), Ms. Manju Agrawal (sister), Ms. Anubha Bhartia (daughter) <strong>and</strong> Ms.N<strong>and</strong>ini Malpani (daughter), save that Ms. N<strong>and</strong>ini Malpani is a director <strong>of</strong> Commercial Automobiles PrivateLimited. For details, refer to heading “Commercial Automobiles Private Limited” further in this section.(2) The siblings <strong>of</strong> Ms. Rekha Gupta: Mr. Indraprak<strong>as</strong>h Agarwal, Mr. B<strong>as</strong>ant Kumar Agarwal, Mr. Rajan KumarAgarwal <strong>and</strong> Ms. Sh<strong>as</strong>hi Singhal.(3) The siblings <strong>and</strong> mother <strong>of</strong> Mr. Ajay Gupta: Mr. Aditya Gupta (brother), Ms. Anita Bharatiya (sister) <strong>and</strong> Ms.Asha Devi Gupta (mother) save that Ms. Asha Devi Gupta is a trustee <strong>of</strong> J<strong>as</strong>hn Beneficiary Trust.135


DeclarationThe Company confirms that the Permanent Account Number, Bank Account details <strong>and</strong> P<strong>as</strong>sport Number <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Promoters</strong> h<strong>as</strong> been submitted to the Stock Exchanges at the time <strong>of</strong> filing the Draft Red Herring Prospectus withthem.Neither the Company nor the <strong>Promoters</strong>, Group Companies, the relatives (<strong>as</strong> per Companies Act, 1956) <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Promoters</strong> have been identified <strong>as</strong> wilful defaulters by Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> India or other authorities. Neither (i) the<strong>Promoters</strong>, members <strong>of</strong> the Promoter Group, Group Companies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Promoters</strong>, nor (ii) the companies with whichany <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Promoters</strong> are or were <strong>as</strong>sociated <strong>as</strong> a promoter, director or person in control, are debarred or prohibitedfrom accessing the capital market for any re<strong>as</strong>on by SEBI or any other authority.History/Background <strong>of</strong> <strong>Promoters</strong>The Company, <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>and</strong> Group Companies have further confirmed that there are no violations <strong>of</strong> securitieslaws committed by them in the p<strong>as</strong>t or currently pending against them except for a violation <strong>of</strong> its listing agreementwith the BSE <strong>and</strong> certain filing requirements under the Takeover Code by one <strong>of</strong> the Group Companies, Kail<strong>as</strong>hAuto Finance Limited. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited had also failed to comply with the disclosure requirementsunder the Takeover Code <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> under the SEBI (Prohibition <strong>of</strong> Insider Trading Regulations), 1992. Most <strong>of</strong>these non-compliances have been regularized by Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited a few days prior to the date <strong>of</strong> thisProspectus. For details <strong>of</strong> such violations by Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited, refer to the Section “Outst<strong>and</strong>ingLitigation <strong>and</strong> Material Developments” on page 182 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus <strong>and</strong> the section “Risk Factors” on page XIII<strong>of</strong> this Prospectus. A public announcement for the purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> shares <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited by M/sPadma Impex Private Limited h<strong>as</strong> been made on May 18, 2010. Our Promoter Director – Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta <strong>and</strong>certain other members <strong>of</strong> the Promoter Group are proposing to sell their entire stake in Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto FinanceLimited. One <strong>of</strong> our Promoter Group companies, Vineet Capital Services (P) Limited used to be registered withSEBI <strong>as</strong> a stock broker on the U. P. Stock Exchange Association Limited, Kanpur under registration numberINB101022839. Vineet Capital Services (P) Limited ce<strong>as</strong>ed to carry on this business from 2004 <strong>and</strong> voluntarilysurrendered its registration on October 29, 2004 pursuant to which its registration w<strong>as</strong> cancelled vide letter numberMIRSD/DR-1/45002/2005 dated July 15, 2005. Vineet Capital Services (P) Limited h<strong>as</strong> confirmed to us that it isnot currently engaged in any securities related business <strong>and</strong> that there are no penalties, enquiries or investigationsby SEBI against it <strong>and</strong> nor does it owe any fees to SEBI.Acquisition <strong>of</strong> Equity Shares by our <strong>Promoters</strong> within the l<strong>as</strong>t 5 yearsOne <strong>of</strong> our <strong>Promoters</strong>, Mr. Ajay Gupta, first acquired shares in the Company within the l<strong>as</strong>t 5 years i.e. onDecember 23, 2006. For details <strong>of</strong> Equity Shares acquired by him in the Company including the date, terms <strong>and</strong>price <strong>of</strong> acquisition <strong>of</strong> such Equity Shares refer to the Section “Capital Structure” on page 25 <strong>of</strong> this Red HerringProspectus. Our other promoter, Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, h<strong>as</strong> held Equity Shares in the Company indirectly throughGroup Companies <strong>and</strong> Promoter Group entities since 1980 <strong>and</strong> directly since October 2005.Common PursuitsThe <strong>Promoters</strong> do not have any interest <strong>of</strong> 10% or more in the equity share capital <strong>of</strong> any venture that is involvedin common pursuits <strong>as</strong> those <strong>of</strong> the Company <strong>and</strong> nor are the Group Companies or <strong>as</strong>sociates <strong>of</strong> the Companyinvolved in any common pursuits <strong>as</strong> those <strong>of</strong> the Company.<strong>Interest</strong> <strong>of</strong> Individual <strong>Promoters</strong>Our Promoter <strong>Directors</strong>, Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta <strong>and</strong> Mr. Ajay Gupta, are interested parties in any dividend <strong>and</strong>distributions made by the Company or to the extent <strong>of</strong> their shareholding in the Company. The remuneration <strong>of</strong>Mr. Ajay Gupta includes commission payable at the rate <strong>of</strong> 2.5% <strong>of</strong> the audited pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax (for the financialyear adjusted for commission) <strong>of</strong> the Company.The Company’s <strong>Promoters</strong> will also be interested in any future contracts that the Company may enter into with any<strong>of</strong> the Group Companies. Our <strong>Promoters</strong> are also directors on the board <strong>of</strong>, or members <strong>of</strong>, certain Group136


Companies <strong>and</strong> Promoter Group entities <strong>and</strong> they may be deemed to be interested to the extent <strong>of</strong> payments madeby our Company, if any, to these parties. <strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> otherwise in this Prospectus, none <strong>of</strong> the beneficiaries <strong>of</strong>loans, <strong>and</strong> advances <strong>and</strong> sundry debtors are related to <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company. For further details, ple<strong>as</strong>e see thesection “Related Party Transactions” beginning on page 154 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.The Promoter <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company may be deemed to be interested in properties acquired, le<strong>as</strong>ed or licensedby the Company from Group Companies <strong>and</strong> entities belonging to the Promoter Group in which they haveshareholding. For details <strong>as</strong> to such properties refer to the sections “Our Business” <strong>and</strong> “History <strong>and</strong> CertainCorporate Matters” beginning on pages 77 <strong>and</strong> 105 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> otherwise in this Prospectus, we have not entered into any contract, agreement or arrangementduring the preceding two years from the date <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus in which the <strong>Promoters</strong> are directly or indirectlyinterested <strong>and</strong> no payments have been made to them in respect <strong>of</strong> any contract, agreement or arrangement that isproposed to be made with them, other than in the normal course <strong>of</strong> business.Group CompaniesUnless otherwise specifically <strong>stated</strong>, none <strong>of</strong> the Group Companies described below (i) is listed on any stockexchange; (ii) h<strong>as</strong> completed any public or rights issue since the date <strong>of</strong> its incorporation; (iii) h<strong>as</strong> become a sickcompany; (iv) is under winding-up; or (v) had a negative net worth <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> FY2009. Unless otherwise specifically<strong>stated</strong>, no application h<strong>as</strong> been made in respect <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the Group Companies to the relevant Registrar <strong>of</strong>Companies in whose jurisdiction such Group Company is registered, for striking <strong>of</strong>f its name. Further, except <strong>as</strong><strong>stated</strong> below, there h<strong>as</strong> been no change in the capital structure <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the Group Companies in the l<strong>as</strong>t sixmonths. The summary financial information <strong>of</strong> the Group Companies presented below is b<strong>as</strong>ed on the auditedfinancial statements <strong>of</strong> each such Group Company. For litigation regarding the Group Companies, refer to theSection “Outst<strong>and</strong>ing Litigation <strong>and</strong> Material Developments” beginning on page 182 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.1. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited (“KAFL”)KAFL w<strong>as</strong> incorporated on November 14, 1984. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> KAFL is to carry on business <strong>as</strong>collection <strong>and</strong> recovery agents <strong>of</strong> Tata Motors Limited in Orissa, Raj<strong>as</strong>than, Chhattisgarh <strong>and</strong> Madhya Pradesh inrelation to hire purch<strong>as</strong>e agreements entered into by Tata Motors Limited with its customers.The capital structure <strong>of</strong> KAFL <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Authorized Share CapitalIssued, Subscribed <strong>and</strong> Paid-upCapitalShareholding PatternNumber <strong>of</strong> shares10,000,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each <strong>and</strong>500,000 preference shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100 each3,805,900 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each <strong>and</strong>94,100 Forfeited Equity SharesAmountRs. 100,000,000Rs. 50,000,000Rs. 38,059,000Rs. 857,033The shareholding pattern <strong>of</strong> KAFL <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Name <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued CapitalDr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta 867,837 22.80Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta (HUF) 24,100 0.63Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta (HUF) / Mr. Raghav14,325 0.38GuptaMs. Rekha Gupta 917,439 24.10Mr. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra Gupta 8,500 0.22137


Name <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued CapitalMr. Atul Goel 11,600 0.30Mr. Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra/Ms. Rekha Gupta 58,081 1.52Mr. Raghav Gupta 64,876 1.70Ms. Shalini Gupta 20,250 0.53Ms. Anubha Gupta 25,961 0.68Mittar Sen Goel 3,100 0.08Ms. Angoori Devi 1,100 0.03Aradhana Motors Private Limited 4,500 0.12The Company 86,650 2.27Commercial Automobiles Private323,867 8.50LimitedCommercial Instalment (P) Limited 48,438 1.27Commercial Motors Finance Limited 27,343 0.72Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders (P) Limited 25,925 0.68Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Limited 1,050 0.03Shivam Motors (P) Limited 49,375 1.30Tirupati Services Limited 32,200 0.85Mr. Ashok Goel 200 0.01Mr. Mohit Goel 3,600 0.10Ms. Rita Goel 1,725 0.05Ms. Pratima Goel 3,325 0.09Mr. Alok Aggarwal 1,000 0.03Ms. Amita Arren 1,425 0.04Ms. Anjana Goel 1,100 0.03Ms. Draupadi Devi 7,812 0.21Mr. Mukul Arren 2,049 0.05Mr. Mukul Arren6,250 0.16(Trustee Anuj Family Trust)Ms. Neeru Gupta 375 0.01Ms. Parul Goel 200 0.01Mr. Prem Prak<strong>as</strong>h Gupta 6,625 0.17Ms. Renu Aggarwal 1,000 0.03Ms. Ruchi Goel 1,100 0.03Ms. Shada Devi 3,612 0.09Mr. Babulal Nema 6,700 0.18Mr. Bhaiyalal Shukla 10,000 0.26Mr. Gaurishankar Agarwal 6,700 0.18138


Name <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued CapitalMs. Sudesh Puri 200 0.01Ms. Suman Uberoi 200 0.01Public 1,<strong>124</strong>,185 29.54Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>Total 3,805,900 100.00The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> KAFL <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:1. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta2. Ms. Shalini Gupta3. Mr. Rajesh B. Dhirawani4. Mr. Rahul AgrawalFinancial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended March 312007 2008 2009Total Income 27.07 28.92 39.42Sales (income from operation) 16.14 26.28 38.87Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax (6.66) 3.24 18.96Equity Share Capital (paid up) 38.91 38.91 38.91Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excludingrevaluation reserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance<strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) Account(2) 11.37 11.37 11.37Earnings/(Loss) per share (B<strong>as</strong>ic)(1) N.A. 1.91 4.67Diluted Earnings per share(1) N.A. 1.91 4.67Net Asset Value per share(1) (11.40) (10.56) (5.70)(1) Face value <strong>of</strong> each equity share is Rs.10.(2) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.KAFL h<strong>as</strong> not made any public or rights issue in the preceding three years. It h<strong>as</strong> not become a sick companyunder the meaning <strong>of</strong> SICA, is not under winding up. It h<strong>as</strong> not made a loss in FY 2009. However, KAFL h<strong>as</strong> anegative net worth <strong>of</strong> Rs. 22.23 million. For details <strong>of</strong> KAFL <strong>as</strong> to market price, capital issues in the l<strong>as</strong>t ten years<strong>and</strong> investor grievances, refer to the Section “Other Regulatory <strong>and</strong> Statutory Disclosures” beginning on page 227<strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.2. Shivam Motors (P) Limited (“Shivam Motors”)Shivam Motors w<strong>as</strong> incorporated on March 22, 1983. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> Shivam Motors is to carry onbusiness <strong>as</strong> authorized dealers in certain districts <strong>of</strong> Chhattisgarh for commercial vehicles produced by Tata MotorsLimited. Shivam Motors also sources hire-purch<strong>as</strong>e business for various financiers on commission-b<strong>as</strong>is.The capital structure <strong>of</strong> Shivam Motors <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Number <strong>of</strong> sharesAmountAuthorized Share Capital 500,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100 each Rs. 50,000,000Issued, Subscribed <strong>and</strong> Paid-upCapital334,500 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100 each Rs. 33,450,000139


During the p<strong>as</strong>t six months, there h<strong>as</strong> been a change in the capital structure <strong>of</strong> SMPL whereby the authorized sharecapital which earlier comprised <strong>of</strong> Rs. 19,250,000 equity share capital <strong>and</strong> Rs. 20,750,000 preference share capitalh<strong>as</strong> been changed to Rs. 50,000,000 equity share capital. Also, the issued capital <strong>of</strong> SMPL h<strong>as</strong> changed from Rs.17,150,000 equity share capital <strong>and</strong> Rs. 15,800,000 preference share capital to Rs. 33,450,000 equity share capital.Shareholding PatternThe shareholding pattern <strong>of</strong> Shivam Motors <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Equity SharesName <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued Equity CapitalTriupati Services Limited 8,000 2.39Commercial Automobiles Private800 0.24LimitedTriupati AutoComp Pvt Limited 50,000 14.95Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance Pvt Limited 5,000 1.50M/s Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Ltd 34,000 10.16Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors 800 0.24Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Co. 550 0.16Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta 132,200 39.52Rekha Gupta 37,500 11.21Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 46,850 14.01Raghav Gupta 18,800 5.62Total 334500 100Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> Shivam Motors <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:1. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta2. Mr. Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta3. Mr. Raghav Gupta4. Ms. Rekha GuptaFinancial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended March 312007 2008 2009Total Income (Sales) 2011.65 1927.75 2003.04Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax 10.79 2.82 9.89Equity Share Capital (paid up) 27.95 27.95 32.95Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excluding revaluationreserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss)Account(2) 35.54 37.73 47.46Earnings/(Loss) per share (B<strong>as</strong>ic)(1) 137.47 35.21 90.51Diluted Earnings per share(1) 137.47 35.21 90.51Net Asset Value per share(1) 522.09 875.83 682.93(1) Face value <strong>of</strong> each equity share is Rs.100.(2) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.Shivam Motors is an unlisted company <strong>and</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> not made any public or rights issue in the preceding three years.It h<strong>as</strong> not become a sick company under the meaning <strong>of</strong> SICA, is not under winding up <strong>and</strong> does not have negativenet worth. It h<strong>as</strong> not made a loss in FY 2009.140


3. Shubham Multi Services Private Limited (“Shubham”)Shubham w<strong>as</strong> incorporated on April 28, 2010. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> Shubham is to carry on business <strong>of</strong>investment in properties <strong>and</strong> shares.The capital structure <strong>of</strong> Shubham <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Number <strong>of</strong> sharesAmountAuthorized Share Capital 1,00,000 Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10each. Rs. 10,00,000Issued, Subscribed <strong>and</strong> Paid-upCapital100,00 Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each Rs. 100,000Shareholding PatternThe shareholding pattern <strong>of</strong> Shubham <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Equity SharesName <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued Equity CapitalPrem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta 1 0.01Shivam Motors Private Limited 9,999 99.99Total 10,000 100Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> Shubham <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:1. Mr. Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra2. Mr. Arun GuptaFinancial PerformanceThe financial performance <strong>of</strong> Shubham for the l<strong>as</strong>t 3 fiscal years is not available since it w<strong>as</strong> recently incorporatedon April 24, 2010.Shubham is an unlisted company <strong>and</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> not made any public or rights issue in the preceding three years. It h<strong>as</strong>not become a sick company under the meaning <strong>of</strong> SICA, is not under winding up <strong>and</strong> does not have negative networth. It h<strong>as</strong> not made a loss in FY 2009.4. Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (“Commercial Automobiles”)Commercial Automobiles w<strong>as</strong> incorporated on September 1, 1997 <strong>as</strong> a private limited company. The principalactivity <strong>of</strong> Commercial Automobiles is to carry on business <strong>as</strong> authorized dealers in certain districts <strong>of</strong> MadhyaPradesh <strong>of</strong> commercial vehicles <strong>and</strong> p<strong>as</strong>senger cars produced by Tata Motors Limited.The capital structure <strong>of</strong> Commercial Automobiles <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Authorized Share CapitalNumber <strong>of</strong> shares13,000,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs.10each.AmountRs. 130,000,000Issued, Subscribed <strong>and</strong> Paid-up 9,400,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 Rs. 94,000,000141


Capitaleach.During the p<strong>as</strong>t six months, there h<strong>as</strong> been a change in the capital structure <strong>of</strong> CAPL whereby the authorized sharecapital which earlier comprised <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60,000,000 equity share capital <strong>and</strong> Rs. 40,000,000 preference share capitalh<strong>as</strong> been changed to Rs. 130,000,000 equity share capital. Also, the issued capital <strong>of</strong> SMPL h<strong>as</strong> changed from Rs.52,500,000 equity share capital <strong>and</strong> Rs. 39,928,000 preference share capital to Rs. 94,000,000 equity share capital.Shareholding PatternThe shareholding pattern <strong>of</strong> Commercial Automobiles <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Equity SharesName <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued Equity CapitalKail<strong>as</strong>h Motors 477,500 5.08Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance Private Limited 900,000 9.57Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta 6,237,750 66.36Rekha Gupta 215,000 2.29Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta & Rekha Gupta (Joint holder) 60,000 0.63Rekha Gupta & Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta (Joint holder) 1,047,250 11.14Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta 90,000 0.96Shakun Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 90,000 0.96Arun Gupta 90,000 0.96Meera Gupta 55,000 0.58Kapoor Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta 35,000 0.37Usha Chabdra 25,000 0.27Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra HUF 25,000 0.27Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 25,000 0.27Nidhi Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 15,000 0.16Kail<strong>as</strong>h Ch<strong>and</strong> HUF 12,500 0.13Total 9,400,000 100.00Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> Commercial Automobiles <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:1. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta2. Mr. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra3. Mr. Rahul Agrawal4. Ms. Angoori Devi5. Mr. Anirudh MalpaniFinancial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended March 312007 2008 2009Total Income (Sales) 1639.16 1816.48 1614.22Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax (2.55) 2.67 8.32Equity Share Capital (paid up) 84.93 84.93 92.43Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excluding revaluationreserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss)Account(2) 23.68 24.55 32.46Earnings/(Loss) per share (B<strong>as</strong>ic)(1) 2.86 2.45 4.67142


Diluted Earnings per share(1) 2.86 2.45 4.67Net Asset Value per share(1) 20.17 68.99 75.17(1) Face value <strong>of</strong> each equity share is Rs.10.(2) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.Commercial Automobiles is an unlisted company <strong>and</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> not made any public or rights issue in the precedingthree years. It h<strong>as</strong> not become a sick company under the meaning <strong>of</strong> SICA, is not under winding up <strong>and</strong> does nothave negative net worth. It h<strong>as</strong> not made a loss in FY2009.5. J. N. Auto Private Limited (“J. N. Auto”)J. N. Auto w<strong>as</strong> incorporated on March 19, 1996. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> J. N. Auto is to carry on business <strong>as</strong>manufacturers <strong>and</strong> galvanizers <strong>of</strong> telecommunications <strong>and</strong> transmission towers.The capital structure <strong>of</strong> J. N. Auto <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares <strong>of</strong>AmountRs. 10 eachAuthorized Share Capital 2,000,000 Rs. 20,000,000Issued, Subscribed <strong>and</strong> Paid-up Capital1,900,000 Rs. 19,000,000During the p<strong>as</strong>t six months, there h<strong>as</strong> been a change in the capital structure <strong>of</strong> J. N. Auto whereby the issued equityshare capital h<strong>as</strong> changed from Rs. 9,000,000 to Rs. 19,000,000.Shareholding PatternThe shareholding pattern <strong>of</strong> J. N. Auto <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Name <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued CapitalDr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta 500,100 26.32Ms. Rekha Gupta 678,500 35.72Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta <strong>and</strong> Ms. Rekha Gupta (jointly) 5,000 0.26Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors 50,000 2.64Mr. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 200,100 10.53Mr. Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta 200,100 10.53Ms. Usha Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 1200 0.06Ms. Meera Gupta 5000 0.26Mr. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra <strong>and</strong> Ms. Usha Ch<strong>and</strong>ra(jointly) 5000 0.26Mr. Prem Ch<strong>and</strong>ra <strong>and</strong> Ms. Urmil Gupta (jointly) 5000 0.26Mr. Manik Ch<strong>and</strong>ra <strong>and</strong> Ms. Shakun Ch<strong>and</strong>ra(jointly) 5000 0.26Mr. Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra <strong>and</strong> Ms. Nidhi Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 5000 0.26Mr. Vikunth Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 40,000 2.11Ms. Nidhi Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 200,000 10.53Total 1900,000 100.00143


Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> J. N. Auto comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:1. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta2. Mrs. Rekha Gupta3. Mr. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>raFinancial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended March 312007 2008 2009Total Income 0.01 0.15 35.98Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax 2.83 (0.08) 1.11Equity Share Capital (paid up) 5.00 5.00 19.00Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excluding revaluationreserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss)Account(2) 0.68 (0.43) (0.31)Earnings/(Loss) per share (B<strong>as</strong>ic)(1) 6.34 0 0.83Diluted Earnings per share(1) 6.34 0 0.83Net Asset Value per share(1) 9.36 9.15 21.20(1) Face value <strong>of</strong> each equity share is Rs.10.(2) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.J. N. Auto is an unlisted company <strong>and</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> not made any public or rights issue in the preceding three years. It h<strong>as</strong>not become a sick company under the meaning <strong>of</strong> SICA, is not under winding up <strong>and</strong> does not have negative networth. It h<strong>as</strong> not made a loss in FY2009.6. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance Private Limited (“Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance”)Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance w<strong>as</strong> incorporated on March 13, 1981. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance isto carry on business <strong>as</strong> collection <strong>and</strong> recovery agents <strong>and</strong> participation business for Tata Motors Limited in OrissaRaj<strong>as</strong>than, Chattisgarh <strong>and</strong> Madhya Pradesh.The capital structure <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Number <strong>of</strong> sharesAmountAuthorized Share Capital 300,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100 each Rs. 30,000,000Issued, Subscribed <strong>and</strong> Paid-up Capital 249,785 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100 each Rs. 24,978,500Shareholding PatternThe shareholding pattern <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Name <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued CapitalCompany 62,920 25.19%Commercial Automobiles PrivateLimited 250 0.10%Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors 750 0.30%Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Company Kanpur 750 0.30%144


Ms. Rekha Gupta 152,000 60.85%Mr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta 18,000 7.21%Rajnig<strong>and</strong>ha Industries PrivateLimited 3,000 1.20%Mr. Krishna Kumar Agrawal 2,745 1.10%Ms.Shalini 2,600 1.04%Ms. Rekha Agrawal 640 0.26%Mr. Atul Goel 500 0.20%Mr. Ashok Gupta 440 0.18%Ms. Amita Arren 400 0.16%Mr. Ankur Goel 400 0.16%Mr. Mukul Arren 400 0.16%Ms. Neeru Gupta 400 0.16%Ms. Nidhi Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 400 0.16%Mr. Santosh Jain 400 0.16%Mr. Satish Jain 350 0.14%M<strong>as</strong>ter Vikunth 350 0.14%Ms. Ruchi 300 0.12%Mr. Jai Jain 250 0.10%Mr. Bhiki Bhai Jain 200 0.08%Ms. Rekhch<strong>and</strong> Kochar 200 0.08%Ms. Usha Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 200 0.08%Mr. Kamlesh Agrawal 140 0.06%Mr. Ram Niw<strong>as</strong> Agarwal 100 0.04%Mr. Ashkaran Bajmar 100 0.04%Mr. Deepch<strong>and</strong> Kochar 100 0.04%Mr. Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta 100 0.04%Mr. Raghav Gupta 100 0.04%Mr. Sampatlal Jain 100 0.04%Ms. Shanti Bai Bajmar 100 0.04%Ms. Sunder Bai Kochhar 100 0.04%Total 249,785 100.00%Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:1. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta2. Mr. Prem Ch<strong>and</strong>ra Gupta3. Mrs. Usha Ch<strong>and</strong>raFinancial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended March 312007 2008 2009Total Income 14.56 2.41 1.45145


Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax 3.27 0.70 0.57Equity Share Capital (paid up) 24.97 24.97 24.97Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excluding revaluationreserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss)Account(2) (2.47) (1.77) (1.20)Earnings/(Loss) per share (B<strong>as</strong>ic)(1) 12.33 4.18 3.18Diluted Earnings per share(1) 12.33 4.18 3.18Net Asset Value per share(1) 80.27 84.45 87.13(1) Face value <strong>of</strong> each equity share is Rs.100.(2) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance is an unlisted company <strong>and</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> not made any public or rights issue in the precedingthree years. It h<strong>as</strong> not become a sick company under the meaning <strong>of</strong> SICA, is not under winding up <strong>and</strong> does nothave negative net worth. It h<strong>as</strong> not made a loss in FY 2009.7. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser Industries Private Limited (“Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser”)Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser w<strong>as</strong> incorporated on July 12, 1993. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser w<strong>as</strong> to carry onbusiness <strong>of</strong> manufacturers <strong>of</strong> garbage compactors. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser h<strong>as</strong> been defunct since 1994 <strong>as</strong> it w<strong>as</strong> not able toget significant orders for its business.The capital structure <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Number <strong>of</strong> sharesAmountAuthorized Share Capital 1,000,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each Rs. 10,000,000Issued, Subscribed <strong>and</strong> Paid-up Capital 171,100 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each Rs. 1,711,000Shareholding PatternThe shareholding pattern <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Name <strong>of</strong> ShareholderNumber <strong>of</strong> equityshares% <strong>of</strong> Issued CapitalDr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta 28,700 16.77Ms. Rekha Gupta 80,500 47.05Mr. Kurt Fluri 61,900 36.18Total 171,100 100.00Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:1. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta2. Mr. Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>raFinancial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended March 312007 2008 2009146


Sales 0.00 0.00 0.00Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax (0.01) (0.008) (0.14)Equity Share Capital (paid up) 17.11 17.11 17.11Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excluding revaluationreserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss)Account(2) (37.34) (37.44) (37.53)Earnings/(Loss) per share (B<strong>as</strong>ic)(1) N.A. N.A. N.A.Diluted Earnings per share(1) N.A. N.A. N.A.Net Asset Value per share(1) N.A. N.A. N.A.(1) Face value <strong>of</strong> each equity share is Rs.10.(2) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser is an unlisted company <strong>and</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> not made any public or rights issue in the preceding three years.It h<strong>as</strong> not become a sick company under the meaning <strong>of</strong> SICA <strong>and</strong> is not under winding up. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser h<strong>as</strong> anegative net worth <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2.06 million. It h<strong>as</strong> made a loss <strong>of</strong> Rs. 14,000 in FY 2009. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser h<strong>as</strong> filed anapplication before the RoC for its name to be struck <strong>of</strong>f from the record.8. Shivam Phoenix Transport Services Private Limited (“Shivam Phoenix”)Shivam Phoenix w<strong>as</strong> incorporated on March 16, 2010. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> Shivam Phoenix is to carry onbusiness <strong>of</strong> running local transport buses.The capital structure <strong>of</strong> Shivam Phoenix <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Number <strong>of</strong> sharesAmountAuthorized Share Capital 50,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each Rs. 500,000Issued, Subscribed <strong>and</strong> Paid-up Capital 10,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each Rs. 100,000Shareholding PatternThe shareholding pattern <strong>of</strong> Shivam Phoenix <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Name <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued CapitalDr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta 5,000 50%Mr. Vishwanath Kunjilal Dubey 5,000 50%Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> Shivam Phoenix <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:1. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta2. Mr. Vishwanath Kunjilal DubeyFinancial PerformanceThe financial performance <strong>of</strong> Shivam Phoenix for the l<strong>as</strong>t 3 fiscal years is not available since it w<strong>as</strong> recentlyincorporated on March 16, 2010.Shivam Phoenix is an unlisted company <strong>and</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> not made any public or rights issue in the preceding three years.It h<strong>as</strong> not become a sick company under the meaning <strong>of</strong> SICA, is not under winding up <strong>and</strong> does not have negativenet worth.9. Narmada Auto Care Services Private Limited (“Narmada Auto”)147


Narmada Auto w<strong>as</strong> incorporated on February 16, 2010. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> Narmada Auto is to carry onbusiness <strong>of</strong> tourist agents <strong>and</strong> contractors <strong>and</strong> to facilitate traveling for tourists including the provision <strong>of</strong>conveniences <strong>of</strong> all kinds such <strong>as</strong> tickets, sleeper cars, berths, lodging arrangements <strong>and</strong> other allied services.The capital structure <strong>of</strong> Narmada Auto <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:148


Number <strong>of</strong> sharesAmountAuthorized Share Capital 50,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each Rs. 500,000Issued, Subscribed <strong>and</strong> Paid-upCapital10,000 equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each Rs. 100,000Shareholding PatternThe shareholding pattern <strong>of</strong> Narmada Auto <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 is <strong>as</strong> follows:Name <strong>of</strong> Shareholder Number <strong>of</strong> equity shares % <strong>of</strong> Issued CapitalMr. Rahul Agrawal 5,000 50%Ms. Rekha Gupta 5,000 50%Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>The board <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>of</strong> Narmada Auto <strong>as</strong> on July 30, 2010 comprises <strong>of</strong> the following:1. Mr. Rahul Agrawal2. Ms. Rekha GuptaFinancial PerformanceThe financial performance <strong>of</strong> Narmada Auto for the l<strong>as</strong>t 3 fiscal years is not available since it w<strong>as</strong> recentlyincorporated on February 16, 2010.Narmada Auto is an unlisted company <strong>and</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> not made any public or rights issue in the preceding three years.It h<strong>as</strong> not become a sick company under the meaning <strong>of</strong> SICA, is not under winding up <strong>and</strong> does not have negativenet worth.10. Commercial Instalment (“Commercial Instalment”)Commercial Instalment is a partnership firm set up on July 1, 1979. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> CommercialInstalment is to carry on the business <strong>of</strong> finance, le<strong>as</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> hire-purch<strong>as</strong>e. It h<strong>as</strong> been defunct since 1999 owingto the entry <strong>of</strong> new companies <strong>and</strong> banks in the same business with whom it w<strong>as</strong> unable to compete.Partnership <strong>Interest</strong>The partnership interest in Commercial Instalment <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 w<strong>as</strong>:Name <strong>of</strong> Partner% <strong>of</strong> Partnership <strong>Interest</strong>Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta 6%Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra HUF (Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra) 21%Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta HUF (Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta) 21%Manik Ch<strong>and</strong>ra HUF (Manik Ch<strong>and</strong>ra) 21%Kapoor Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta HUF (Raghav Gupta) 21%Mr. Arun Gupta 10%Total 100%Financial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended March 312007 2008 2009149


Total Income 1.36 2.97 0.94Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax (1.72) (0.65) (2.92)Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excluding revaluationreserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss)Account(1) NIL NIL NIL(1) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.Commercial Instalment h<strong>as</strong> a negative worth <strong>of</strong> Rs. 23.83 million <strong>and</strong> h<strong>as</strong> made a loss <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2.92 million in FY2009.11. Commercial Body Builders (“CBB”)CBB is a partnership firm set up on March 28, 1977. CBB is in the business <strong>of</strong> rendering financial advice oncommission b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>and</strong> renting out immovable properties.Partnership <strong>Interest</strong>The partnership interest in CBB <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010w<strong>as</strong>:Name <strong>of</strong> Partner% <strong>of</strong> Partnership <strong>Interest</strong>Kail<strong>as</strong>h Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta HUF (Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta) 20%Mr. Ishwar Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 12.50%Mr. Arun Gupta 12.50%Mr. Raghav Gupta 15%Mr. Manik Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta 15%Mr. Prem Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta 12.50%Ms. Nidhi Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 12.50%Total 100%Financial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended March 312007 2008 2009Total Income 39.75 81.48 48.82Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax 1.37 (0.38) 8.15Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excluding revaluationreserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss)Account(1) NIL NIL NIL(1) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.CBB h<strong>as</strong> a negative worth <strong>of</strong> Rs. 12.77 million. CBB h<strong>as</strong> not made a loss in FY 2009.12. Kail<strong>as</strong>h TradersKail<strong>as</strong>h Traders is a partnership firm set up on March 28, 1977. The principal activity <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders is tocarry on the business <strong>of</strong> finance <strong>and</strong> trading. It h<strong>as</strong> been defunct since 1999 owing to the entry <strong>of</strong> new companies<strong>and</strong> banks in the business <strong>of</strong> finance, le<strong>as</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> hire-purch<strong>as</strong>e with whom it w<strong>as</strong> unable to compete.Partnership <strong>Interest</strong>The partnership interest in Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 w<strong>as</strong>:Name <strong>of</strong> Partner% <strong>of</strong> Partnership <strong>Interest</strong>Ms. Rekha Gupta 25%Mr. Arun Gupta 10%150


Mr. Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 15%Ms. Usha Ch<strong>and</strong>ra 15%Ms. Pratima Goel 10%Ms. Rita Goel 25%Total 100%Financial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended 31 March2007 2008 2009Total Income 1.40 2.90 2.02Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax (0.55) 2.27 1.85Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excluding revaluationreserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss)Account(1) NIL NIL NIL(1) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders does not have negative worth <strong>and</strong> nor h<strong>as</strong> it made a loss in FY 2009.13. Eur<strong>of</strong>ibre IndiaEur<strong>of</strong>ibre India is a partnership firm set up on November 16, 1998. Its principal activity w<strong>as</strong> to carry on business<strong>of</strong> manufacturers <strong>of</strong> textile made-ups (specifically bed linen). It h<strong>as</strong> been defunct since 2002 <strong>as</strong> the partnersdecided to look at other business options.Partnership <strong>Interest</strong>The partnership interest in Eur<strong>of</strong>ibre India <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> July 30, 2010 w<strong>as</strong>:Name <strong>of</strong> Partner% <strong>of</strong> Partnership <strong>Interest</strong>(in c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> loss)% <strong>of</strong> Partnership <strong>Interest</strong>(in c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it)Ajay Gupta (HUF) 19% 10%Mrs. Shalini Gupta 81% 50%M<strong>as</strong>ter Anirudh Gupta (Minor) 20%M<strong>as</strong>ter Shree Vardhan Gupta (Minor) 20%Total 100% 100%Financial Performance(Rs. In million except in per share data)For the period ended March 312007 2008 2009Total Income 0.00 0.00 0.00Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss) after Tax (0.53) (0.02) (0.02)Reserves <strong>and</strong> surplus (excluding revaluationreserves) <strong>and</strong> debit balance <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it/(Loss)Account(1) NIL NIL NIL(1) Net <strong>of</strong> miscellaneous expenditure not written <strong>of</strong>f.Eur<strong>of</strong>ibre India does not have negative worth but it h<strong>as</strong> made a loss <strong>of</strong> Rs. 0.02 million in FY 2009.151


Listed Group CompaniesOur Group Company, Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto, is listed on the BSE. Our <strong>as</strong>sociate company, Tirupati Services Limited, islisted on the Delhi Stock Exchange Limited <strong>and</strong> U. P. Stock Exchange Association Limited. For details <strong>as</strong> tomarket price, capital issues <strong>and</strong> investor grievances, refer to section “Other Regulatory <strong>and</strong> Statutory Disclosures”beginning on page 227 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.Defunct Group CompaniesThe following Group Companies are defunct:Companies1. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Moser Industries Private Limited: defunct since 1994 <strong>as</strong> it w<strong>as</strong> unable to get significant orders forits business <strong>of</strong> manufacturing garbage compactors.Firms1. Commercial Instalment: defunct since 1999 owing to the entry <strong>of</strong> new companies <strong>and</strong> banks in thebusiness <strong>of</strong> finance, le<strong>as</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> hire-purch<strong>as</strong>e with whom it w<strong>as</strong> unable to compete.2. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders: defunct since 1999 owing to the entry <strong>of</strong> new companies <strong>and</strong> banks in the business <strong>of</strong>finance, le<strong>as</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> hire-purch<strong>as</strong>e with whom it w<strong>as</strong> unable to compete.3. Eur<strong>of</strong>ibre India: defunct since 2002 <strong>as</strong> the partners decided to look at other business options.Companies, firms <strong>and</strong> other entities from which the <strong>Promoters</strong> have dis<strong>as</strong>sociated themselvesDr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta h<strong>as</strong> dis<strong>as</strong>sociated himself from the following firms/entities/HUFs in the l<strong>as</strong>t three years:Entity from whichDateRe<strong>as</strong>onsdis<strong>as</strong>sociatedKail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited February 5, 2010 Focus on the Company’sKail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders (P) Limited December 1, 2009 Focus on business the Company’sKail<strong>as</strong>h ShinmMaywa Industries April 10, 2010 Focus on business the Company’sLimitedbusinessMr. Ajay Gupta h<strong>as</strong> dis<strong>as</strong>sociated himself from the following firms/entities/HUFs in the l<strong>as</strong>t three years:Entity from whichDateRe<strong>as</strong>onsKail<strong>as</strong>h Auto dis<strong>as</strong>sociated Finance Limited November 8, 2009 Focus on the Company’sCommercial Automobiles Private February 22, 2010 Focus on business the Company’sLimitedbusinessDetails <strong>of</strong> Common PursuitsNone <strong>of</strong> the Group Companies have common pursuits.<strong>Interest</strong> <strong>of</strong> Group Companies in Promotion <strong>of</strong> the CompanyNone <strong>of</strong> the Group Companies have any interest in the promotion <strong>of</strong> the Company except CommercialAutomobiles Private Limited in its capacity <strong>as</strong> a shareholder holding 270,540 Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> the Company.Related Party TransactionsThe Company acquired the M<strong>and</strong>la Factory in 2008 from Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, a venturebelonging to the Promoter Group under a Scheme <strong>of</strong> De-Merger sanctioned in 2008 by the BIFR. For details <strong>of</strong>the Scheme <strong>of</strong> De-Merger, refer to section “History <strong>and</strong> Certain Corporate Matters” beginning on page 105 <strong>of</strong> thisProspectus.152


For details <strong>of</strong> (i) payments or benefits to the <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Promoter Group during the two years precedingthe date <strong>of</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus; (ii) sales or purch<strong>as</strong>es between the Company, its subsidiaries <strong>and</strong> the GroupCompanies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Promoters</strong> where such sales or purch<strong>as</strong>es exceed in value in the aggregate 10% <strong>of</strong> the total sales orpurch<strong>as</strong>es <strong>of</strong> the Company; <strong>and</strong> (iii) business interests <strong>of</strong> Group Companies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Promoters</strong> in the Company, see thesection “Related Party Transactions” beginning on page 154 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.<strong>Interest</strong> in the Property <strong>of</strong> the Company<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> disclosed in the section “Related Party Transactions” beginning on page 154 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus, none <strong>of</strong>the <strong>Promoters</strong> or Group Companies have any interest in any property <strong>of</strong> the Company acquired by the Companyor proposed to be acquired by the Company within two years preceding the date <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.LitigationFor details relating to legal proceedings involving the <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Group Companies, see the section“Outst<strong>and</strong>ing Litigation <strong>and</strong> Material Developments” beginning on page 182 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.153


RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSFor details <strong>of</strong> Related Party Transactions, refer to the section “Financial Statements”, beginning on page F-1 <strong>of</strong> thisProspectus.154


DIVIDEND POLICYThe Company h<strong>as</strong> not declared any dividend in the l<strong>as</strong>t five Financial Years. The declaration <strong>and</strong> payment <strong>of</strong>dividend is recommended by the Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>and</strong> approved by the shareholders <strong>of</strong> the Company at theirdiscretion <strong>and</strong> will depend on a number <strong>of</strong> factors, including the results <strong>of</strong> operations, earnings, capitalrequirements <strong>and</strong> surplus, general financial conditions, contractual restrictions, applicable Indian legal restrictions<strong>and</strong> other factors considered relevant by the Board. The Board may also from time to time pay interim dividend.All dividend payments are made in c<strong>as</strong>h to the shareholders <strong>of</strong> the Company.155


SECTION V: FINANCIAL INFORMATIONFINANCIAL STATEMENTSAUDITORS’ REPORTTo,The Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>,Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Limited.(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)<strong>124</strong>, Napier Town,Jabalpur – 482 001Dear Sirs,Re: Proposed initial public <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> equity shares having a face value <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10/- each for c<strong>as</strong>h, at an issue price to be arrived at by the book buildingprocess (referred <strong>as</strong> the ‘Offer’).____________________________________________________________________________________________We have reviewed <strong>and</strong> examined the financial information <strong>of</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Limited (Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers &Body Builders Co Private Limited). (‘CEBBCO’ or ‘the Company’) annexed to this report <strong>and</strong> initialed by us for identification. The financial information h<strong>as</strong>been prepared in accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Part II <strong>of</strong> Schedule II to the Companies Act, 1956 (‘the Act’), the Securities <strong>and</strong> Exchange Board <strong>of</strong> India(‘SEBI’) – (Issue <strong>of</strong> Capital <strong>and</strong> Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009 (the ‘ICDR Regulations’) <strong>and</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> engagement agreed upon by us with theCompany. The financial information h<strong>as</strong> been prepared by the Company <strong>and</strong> approved by its Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>.A. Financial Information:The financial information referred to above, relating to pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>and</strong> losses <strong>and</strong> <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>and</strong> liabilities <strong>of</strong> CEBBCO is contained in Annexure I, II, III <strong>and</strong> IV tothis report:a) Annexure I contains Summary Statements <strong>of</strong> Assets <strong>and</strong> Liabilities, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2006;b) Annexure II contains Summary Statements <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>and</strong> Losses, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> for the years ended March 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2006;c) Annexure III contains Summary Statements <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>h Flows, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>;d) Annexure IV contains the Summary <strong>of</strong> Significant Accounting Policies <strong>and</strong> Notes to Re<strong>stated</strong> Summary Statements.B. Other Financial Information:F-1


Other financial information relating to CEBBCO prepared by the Company is attached in Annexures V to XXVI to this report:a) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Share Capital, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure V);b) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Reserves <strong>and</strong> Surplus, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure VI);c) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Secured Loans, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure VII);d) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Unsecured Loans, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure VIII);e) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Fixed Assets, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure IX);f) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Debtors, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure X);g) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Loans <strong>and</strong> Advances, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XI);h) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong> Bank Balances, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XII);i) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Inventories, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XIII);j) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Investments, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XIV);k) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Current Liabilities <strong>and</strong> Provisions, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XV);l) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Income from Operations, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XVI);m) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Other Income, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XVII)n) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Manufacturing Expenses, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XVIII);o) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Employee Remuneration <strong>and</strong> Benefits, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XIX);p) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Operating <strong>and</strong> Other Expenses, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XX);q) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interest</strong> <strong>and</strong> Finance Charges, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XXI);r) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Related Party Disclosures, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XXII);s) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Contingent Liabilities (Annexure XXIII);t) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Capitalisation, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XXIV);u) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Tax Shelters, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XXV);v) Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Accounting Ratios, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> (Annexure XXVI).C. We have reviewed <strong>and</strong> examined, <strong>as</strong> appropriate, the financial information contained in these Annexures <strong>and</strong> are to state <strong>as</strong> follows:(i) The financial information contained in these Annexures is b<strong>as</strong>ed on the audited financial statements <strong>of</strong> the Company for the years ended March 31,2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2006.(ii) The financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2006 <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2007 have been audited by M/s Gupta Associates, Chartered Accountants.We have relied on the financial statements for the years ended March 31, 2006 <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2007 which have been audited by other auditors for thepurposes <strong>of</strong> this report.(iii) The Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Assets <strong>and</strong> Liabilities, Pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>and</strong> Losses <strong>and</strong> Statement <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>h Flows (Summary Statements) have been re<strong>stated</strong> withretrospective effect to reflect the Significant Accounting Policies being adopted by the Company <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2010, if material <strong>and</strong> after consideringthe effect <strong>of</strong> Auditor’s Qualifications, if any.F-2


D. In our opinion, the financial information <strong>of</strong> the Company attached to this report read with Significant Accounting Policies <strong>and</strong> Notes to Re<strong>stated</strong> SummaryStatements other notes contained in the Annexures h<strong>as</strong> been prepared in accordance with Part II <strong>of</strong> Schedule II <strong>of</strong> the Act <strong>and</strong> the ICDR Regulations.E. This report is intended for your information <strong>and</strong> for inclusion in the Offer Document being issued by the Company with regard to the aforesaid Proposedinitial public <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> equity shares <strong>of</strong> the Company for c<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong> is not to be used, referred to or distributed for any other purpose without our prior writtenconsent.For Deloitte H<strong>as</strong>kins & SellsChartered Accountants(Firm’s Registration No.: 117366W)MumbaiDated: September 6, 2010A. B. JaniPartnerMembership No.: 46488F-3


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE I : SUMMARY STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)As at March 31Particulars2010 2009 2008 2007 2006AFIXED ASSETSGross Block 364.82 332.26 134.61 84.49 61.47Less: Depreciation 114.73 80.67 64.16 44.72 37.88Net Block 250.09 251.59 70.45 39.77 23.59Capital Work- In- Progress 199.55 73.51 77.16 10.81 8.26Total (A) 449.64 325.10 147.61 50.58 31.85B INVESTMENTS (B) 6.34 6.72 6.72 2.03 4.78CDeferred Tax Assets (Net) (C) - - 1.31 0.58 0.58DCURRENT ASSETS, LOANS ANDADVANCESInventories 534.33 289.39 257.90 266.80 106.44Sundry Debtors 582.48 149.57 245.65 353.93 130.72F-4


C<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong> Bank Balances 34.37 37.45 211.40 34.85 5.51Loans <strong>and</strong> Advances 351.24 273.69 168.18 168.74 37.70Total (D) 1,502.42 750.10 883.13 824.32 280.37ELIABILITIES AND PROVISIONSCurrent Liabilities 631.88 485.47 220.58 340.51 138.89Provisions 61.17 4.72 11.86 20.47 11.46Secured Loans 544.66 71.80 297.54 339.87 90.28Unsecured Loans 3.01 - 6.47 2.59 6.21Total (E) 1,240.72 561.99 536.45 703.44 246.84F Deferred Tax Liability (Net) (F) 5.97 0.19 - - -G Net Worth (A+B+C+D-E-F)711.71 519.74 502.32 174.07 70.74HRepresented by:1) Share Capital 428.96 61.28 61.28 45.70 19.152) Share Application Money - - - - 8.403) Reserves <strong>and</strong> Surplus:(a) Securities Premium Account - 288.89 288.89 - -F-5


(b) General Reserve 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.10 0.10(c) Capital Reserve 0.87 0.87 0.87 - -(d) Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account 280.90 167.72 150.30 128.27 43.09I Net Worth 711.71 519.74 502.32 174.07 70.74The accompanying significant accounting policies <strong>and</strong> notes (Annexure IV) form an integral part <strong>of</strong> this statement.F-6


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE II : SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsFor the year ended March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006INCOMESales <strong>and</strong> Income from Operations 2,409.63 1,708.27 1,987.22 1,663.99 799.82Less : Excise duty 580.99 587.81 795.14 707.65 298.31Net Sales 1,828.64 1,120.46 1,192.08 956.34 501.51Other Income 47.88 47.76 57.67 26.49 16.56Incre<strong>as</strong>e in Inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work inprogress <strong>and</strong> scrap92.19 93.30 14.74 51.14 4.89Total Income 1,968.71 1,261.52 1,264.49 1,033.97 522.96EXPENDITUREManufacturing Expenses 1,390.06 1,049.60 997.08 821.09 425.24Employee Remuneration <strong>and</strong> Benefits 73.85 55.35 44.66 31.36 28.78Operating <strong>and</strong> Other Expenses 92.08 62.60 62.29 37.96 24.33<strong>Interest</strong> <strong>and</strong> Finance Charges 68.32 53.79 45.12 25.06 9.69Depreciation / Amortisation 36.39 16.74 9.16 7.49 2.88Total Expenditure 1,660.70 1,238.08 1,158.31 922.96 490.92F-7


PROFIT BEFORE TAX 308.01 23.44 106.18 111.01 32.04LESS: PROVISION FOR TAXCurrent Tax 99.25 7.34 41.22 39.09 10.60Deferred Tax 5.78 1.50 (0.73) *0.00 (0.60)Wealth Tax - 0.02 - 0.06 0.05Fringe Benefits Tax - 0.49 0.48 0.28 0.25Total Provision for Tax 105.02 9.35 40.97 39.43 10.30NET PROFIT AFTER TAX AS PER AUDITEDFINANCIAL STATEMENTSAdjustments made on account <strong>of</strong> restatement (ReferNote B(1)(I) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV)202.99 14.09 65.21 71.58 21.74(11.02) 3.33 (3.82) 13.60 3.30NET PROFIT AFTER TAX, AS RESTATED 191.97 17.42 61.39 85.18 25.04Balance brought forward from previous year, <strong>as</strong>re<strong>stated</strong>Less: Capitalised on issue <strong>of</strong> Bonus shares (ReferNote no. B (5) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV)Less: Debit balance in Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss accountpursuant to Scheme <strong>of</strong> Arrangement(Refer Note B(1)(III)(c) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV)BALANCE CARRIED FORWARD, ASRESTATED167.72 150.30 128.27 43.09 18.05(78.79) - - - -- - (39.36) - -280.90 167.72 150.30 128.27 43.09The accompanying significant accounting policies <strong>and</strong> notes (Annexure IV) form an integral part <strong>of</strong> this statement.*Rs. 2,000.00F-8


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE III: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, AS RESTATEDFor the year ended March 31(Rs. in Millions)2010 2009 2008 2007 2006AC<strong>as</strong>h Flow from operating activitiesNet Pr<strong>of</strong>it before Tax <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> 310.56 26.47 99.64 111.04 35.64Depreciation / Amortisation 36.39 16.74 9.16 7.49 2.88(Pr<strong>of</strong>it) /Loss on Sale <strong>of</strong> Fixed Assets 0.13 0.40 (0.19) (1.69) *(0.00)<strong>Interest</strong> Income (7.89) (19.18) (17.24) (2.26) (2.36)Investment written <strong>of</strong>f - - 0.10 - -Provision for Diminution in value <strong>of</strong> investment 0.38 - - - -Bad debts <strong>and</strong> Advances written <strong>of</strong>f 0.70 - - - -Exchange rate Difference - 2.86 - - -Fixed Assets/ Capital Work In Progress written <strong>of</strong>f 0.02 5.75 0.27 - -Excess Provision for earlier year written back (0.27) (0.02) (0.24) (0.02) (0.89)Provision for Doubtful Debts written back (0.52) (0.93) - - -Provision for Doubtful Debts / Advances - 0.38 2.60 - -<strong>Interest</strong> <strong>and</strong> Finance Charges 68.32 53.79 45.12 25.06 9.69Operating Pr<strong>of</strong>it before working capital changes 407.82 86.26 139.22 139.62 44.96(Incre<strong>as</strong>e)/ decre<strong>as</strong>e in Inventories (244.95) (31.46) 5.39 (160.41) (56.07)(Incre<strong>as</strong>e)/ decre<strong>as</strong>e in Trade <strong>and</strong> Other Receivable (509.58) (6.31) 76.94 (353.99) (110.72)F-9


Decre<strong>as</strong>e / (incre<strong>as</strong>e) in Trade Payable <strong>and</strong> Other Liabilities 191.28 264.53 (136.27) 223.97 101.06C<strong>as</strong>h (used in)/Generated from Operations (155.43) 313.02 85.28 (150.80) (20.77)Taxes Paid (Net) (56.80) (20.59) (44.58) (39.43) (7.34)Net c<strong>as</strong>h (used in) / Generated from operating activities (212.23) 292.43 40.70 (190.23) (28.11)BC<strong>as</strong>h Flow from Investing Activities<strong>Interest</strong> Received 7.89 19.19 17.24 2.26 2.36Proceeds from Sale <strong>of</strong> Investment - - - 2.75 -Proceeds from Sale <strong>of</strong> Fixed Assets 0.28 3.00 0.91 7.95 0.19Purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Fixed Assets (206.58) (202.55) (91.62) (32.48) (17.17)Net C<strong>as</strong>h used in Investing activities (198.41) (180.36) (73.47) (19.52) (14.62)CC<strong>as</strong>h Flow from Financial ActivitiesIncre<strong>as</strong>e in Share Capital - - 14.40 18.15 -Share Premium - - 285.72 - -Receipt / (Repayment) from/<strong>of</strong> Borrowings 475.88 (232.23) (45.88) 246.01 56.45<strong>Interest</strong> <strong>and</strong> Finance Charges Paid (68.32) (53.79) (45.12) (25.06) (9.69)Net C<strong>as</strong>h from / (used in) Financing Activities 407.56 (286.02) 209.12 239.10 46.76Net (decre<strong>as</strong>e)/ incre<strong>as</strong>e in c<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong> c<strong>as</strong>h equivalents (3.08) (173.95) 176.35 29.34 4.03C<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong> c<strong>as</strong>h equivalent <strong>as</strong> at start <strong>of</strong> the year 37.45 211.40 34.85 5.51 1.48C<strong>as</strong>h balance acquired on acquisition <strong>of</strong> Jabalpur Unit <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>hAuto Builders Private Limited- - 0.20 - -F-10


C<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong> c<strong>as</strong>h equivalent <strong>as</strong> at end <strong>of</strong> the year 34.37 37.45 211.40 34.85 5.51Deposits with banks under lien against credit facilities with banks /guarantees given by bank.#REF!21.45 11.41 80.00 11.05 1.18* Rs. 2,000.00Notes:34.37 37.45 211.40 34.85 5.511 Components <strong>of</strong> c<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong> c<strong>as</strong>h equivalents include c<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong> bank balances <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> in Annexure XII <strong>of</strong> the Summary Statements.2 Purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Fixed Assets is considered <strong>as</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the investing activities.3 The above does not include issue <strong>of</strong> Equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs 367.677 million which are issued <strong>as</strong> bonus shares during the year ended March 31, 2010(Refer Note no. B (5) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV).4 The C<strong>as</strong>h Flow Statement h<strong>as</strong> been prepared in accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ard 3 on "C<strong>as</strong>h Flow Statement" (AS 3) <strong>as</strong>notified under the Companies (Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards) Rules, 2006.F-11


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE V : SUMMARY STATEMENT OF SHARE CAPITAL, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006AUTHORISED:Nos. <strong>of</strong> Equity Share 60,000,000 750,000 750,000 600,000 400,000Face Value (In Rs.) (Refer Note no. B(5) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV) 10 100 100 100 100Total Value 600 75 75 60 40Nos. <strong>of</strong> Preference Share 5,000 5,000 5,000 - -Face Value (In Rs.) 100 100 100 - -Total Value 0.50 0.50 0.50 - -Total Authorised Share Capital 600.50 75.50 75.50 60.00 40.00ISSUED, SUBSCRIBED AND PAID-UP:Nos. <strong>of</strong> Equity Share 42,895,720 612,796 600,961 457,000 191,500Face Value (In Rs.) 10 100 100 100 100F-12


Total Value (Refer Note 1) 428.96 61.28 60.10 45.70 19.15Note 1:- Out <strong>of</strong> the above:(i) 142,789 Equity Shares have been issued upon conversion<strong>of</strong> M<strong>and</strong>atorily Convertible 3,000 Preference Shares <strong>of</strong>Rs.100/- each <strong>as</strong> per agreed terms in the year ended March 31,2008.(ii) 36,767,760 Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10/- each were allotedduring the year ended March 31, 2010 <strong>as</strong> fully paid-up bonusshares by capitalisation <strong>of</strong> Share Premium account <strong>and</strong>balance in Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss account. (Refer Note no. B (5) <strong>of</strong>Annexure IV)SHARE CAPITAL SUSPENSE ACCOUNT:Nos. <strong>of</strong> Equity Share 11,835Face Value (In Rs.) - - 100 - -Total Value (Refer Note 2) - - 1.18 - -Note 2: 11,835 Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs 100 each to be allotted ata premium <strong>of</strong> Rs 267.41 per share pursuant to the Scheme <strong>of</strong>Arrangement without payment being received in c<strong>as</strong>h.Total 428.96 61.28 61.28 45.70 19.15F-13


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE VI: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF RESERVES AND SURPLUS, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006Securities Premium AccountAs per l<strong>as</strong>t Balance Sheet 288.89 288.89 - - -Add: On conversion <strong>of</strong> m<strong>and</strong>atorily convertiblepreference shares in to Equity Shares.Add: Credited pursuant to the scheme <strong>of</strong> arrangement(Refer Note no. B(1)(III)(c) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV)Less: Capitalised on issue <strong>of</strong> bonus shares (Refer Noteno. B (5) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV)- - 285.72 - -- - 3.17 - -288.89Closing Balance - 288.89 288.89 - -General ReserveAs per l<strong>as</strong>t Balance Sheet 0.98 0.98 0.10 0.10 0.10Add: Pursuant to scheme <strong>of</strong> arrangement (Refer Note no.B(1)(III)(c) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV)- - 0.88 - -Closing Balance 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.10 0.10Capital ReserveAs per l<strong>as</strong>t Balance Sheet 0.87 0.87 - - -Add: Pursuant to scheme <strong>of</strong> arrangement (Refer Note no.B(1)(III)(c) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV)- - 0.87 - -Closing Balance 0.87 0.87 0.87 - -F-14


Balance in Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account 280.90 167.72 150.30 128.27 43.09Total 282.76 458.46 441.03 128.37 43.19F-15


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE VII : SUMMARY STATEMENT OF SECURED LOANS, AS RESTATEDParticularsAs at March 31(Rs. in Millions)2010 2009 2008 2007 2006Term Loan (Refer Note 1)State Bank <strong>of</strong> India 101.16 - - - -Axis Bank Limited 4.80 5.73 6.52 7.25 8.10C<strong>as</strong>h Credit Facilities (Refer Note 2)State Bank <strong>of</strong> India 203.48 11.72 56.07 - 20.00Centurion Bank <strong>of</strong> Punjab Limited - - 4.29 19.77 -Axis Bank Limited 5.96 - - - -Working Capital Loans (Refer Note2)Hong Kong <strong>and</strong> Shanghai BankingCorporation129.26 54.13 229.81 310.93 61.73Yes Bank Limited 100.00 - - - -Vehicle Loans (Refer Note 3)ICICI Bank Limited - 0.22 0.64 1.02 -Sundram Finance Limited - - 0.11 0.22 0.39F-16


Telco - - - - 0.06Machinery Loan (Refer Note 4)ICICI Bank Limited - - 0.10 0.68 -Total 544.66 71.80 297.54 339.87 90.28Notes:1 Term Loans are secured by:a. First charge <strong>of</strong> L<strong>and</strong> adme<strong>as</strong>uring 18,062 sq.ft. bearing plot no. 2 (New), 14 (Old), Part <strong>of</strong> Bunglow No. 37D, Block no. 36, situated at CivilLines Ward, Civil Station, Pachpedi, Jabalpur, st<strong>and</strong>ing in the name <strong>of</strong> Smt. AngooriDevi.b. First charge <strong>of</strong> unnumbered Plot situated at Richhai <strong>of</strong> Unit -III area- 105000 Square feet (le<strong>as</strong>e hold), Plot No 133/2 Village Udaipura <strong>of</strong> Unit II15.92 acre (free hold) <strong>and</strong> Sector 3, plot no 690-693 <strong>and</strong> 751-756 area 8.67 acres at Pithampur industrial area (le<strong>as</strong>e hold)c. Equitable mortgage <strong>of</strong> Plot no 21, 22, 33, 34 <strong>of</strong> Unit -I industrial area Richhai, Flat No 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 & 14 <strong>of</strong> Dhiraj Apartment situated atNarmada Road,Jabalpur.d. Equitable mortgage <strong>of</strong> property situated at Block No 36, Plot 2/29, Pachpedi South Civil Lines, Jabalpur.e. Personal Guarantee <strong>of</strong> directors <strong>and</strong> Smt. Angoori devi.2.C<strong>as</strong>h Credit Facilities <strong>and</strong> Working Capital Loans are secured / to be secured by either one or more <strong>of</strong> the following <strong>as</strong> per terms <strong>of</strong> Arrangement withrespective banks:- by pari p<strong>as</strong>su charge on Current Assets <strong>of</strong> the Company both present <strong>and</strong> future,- by pari p<strong>as</strong>su charge on Fixed Assets <strong>of</strong> the Company both present <strong>and</strong> future,- by hypothecation <strong>of</strong> stock <strong>and</strong>receivables <strong>of</strong> the Company,- by equitable mortgage <strong>of</strong> Factory L<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Building,- by personal guarantee <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Directors</strong>,- by security <strong>of</strong> Term Deposit receipts,- by corporate guarantee <strong>of</strong> group Companies.F-17


3. Secured by hypothecation <strong>of</strong> vehicles.4. Secured by hypothecation <strong>of</strong> machinery.Notes: The following table shows the major Terms <strong>and</strong> Conditions <strong>of</strong> the secured loan obtained by the Company:LenderSanctionedAmount(in Millions)Amountoutst<strong>and</strong>ing(in Millions)Rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>Interest</strong>RepaymentDatePrepaymentChargesSecurity <strong>of</strong>feredTerm LoansState Bank <strong>of</strong> India120.00 101.16SBAR + 1.5% i.e.13.25%SBAR <strong>as</strong> onDecember 31, 2009w<strong>as</strong> 11.75%Refer Note 1BelowPrepaymentcharges <strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong> perthe ratesapplicable at thetime <strong>of</strong>prepaymentRefer Note 2 BelowAxis Bank Limited8.10 4.80 9.50%84 equatedmonthlyinstallment <strong>of</strong>Rs 132,387/-for Principal<strong>and</strong> interestPrepayment <strong>of</strong>loan will attract2% <strong>of</strong>outst<strong>and</strong>ing loanamountFirst charge <strong>of</strong> L<strong>and</strong> adme<strong>as</strong>uring18,062 sq.ft. bearing plot no. 2 (New),14 (Old), Part <strong>of</strong> Bunglow No. 37D,Block no. 36, situated at Civil LinesWard,Civil Station Pachpedi, Jabalpurst<strong>and</strong>ing in the name <strong>of</strong> Smt. AngooriDevi <strong>and</strong> personnel guarantee <strong>of</strong>DirectorWorking Capital Loans/ C<strong>as</strong>h Credit FacilitiesState Bank <strong>of</strong> India220.00 203.48SBAR + 2.0% i.e.13.75%SBAR <strong>as</strong> onDecember 31, 2009w<strong>as</strong> 11.75%Repayable ondem<strong>and</strong>Not Applicable1st charge on all Current Assets,residual charge on factory l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>buildings <strong>of</strong> Unit 1, Unit 2 <strong>and</strong> Unit 3<strong>and</strong> personal guarantee <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>.F-18


Yes Bank LimitedYes Bank primelending rates less3% p.a i.e. 13.00%Tenor 6 months Not Applicable 1st Pari p<strong>as</strong>u charge on Current Assets,unconditional <strong>and</strong> irrevocable personalguarantee <strong>of</strong> Mr. Ajay Gupta.Axis Bank LimitedHongkong <strong>and</strong>Shanghai BankingCorporation100.00 100.00Yes bank primelending rate is16.50% p.a <strong>as</strong> onDecember 31st,2009.80.00 5.96 11.75%130.00 129.26 11.75%Repayable ondem<strong>and</strong>Maximumtenure 45 daysfrom the datefrom which theamount isobtainedNot ApplicableNot Applicable1st Pari p<strong>as</strong>u charge on current <strong>as</strong>sets<strong>of</strong> the Company both present <strong>and</strong>future, second pari p<strong>as</strong>u charge onfixed <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>of</strong> the Company bothpresent <strong>and</strong> future. Personal guarantee<strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>.1st Pari p<strong>as</strong>u charge on movable fixed<strong>as</strong>sets, personal gurantee <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong><strong>and</strong> corporate gurantee <strong>of</strong> CommercialAutomobiles (P) Ltd. <strong>and</strong> CommercialBody Builders.Note:1. Term loan <strong>of</strong> State Bank <strong>of</strong> India is required to be repaid in the following installments starting from September 30, 2009 <strong>as</strong> follows:YearAmount(In Millions)Installments2009-10 20.00 72010-11 42.00 122011-12 42.00 122012-13 16.00 2120.00 33F-19


2 Term Loan issecured bya. First charge <strong>of</strong> unnumbered Plot situated at Richhai <strong>of</strong> Unit -III area- 105,000 Square feet (le<strong>as</strong>e hold), Plot No 133/2 Village Udaipura <strong>of</strong> Unit II15.92 acre (free hold) <strong>and</strong> Sector 3, plot no 690-693 <strong>and</strong> 751-756 area 8.67 acres at Pithampur industrial area (le<strong>as</strong>ehold)b. Equitable mortgage <strong>of</strong> Plot no 21, 22, 33, 34 <strong>of</strong> Unit -I industrial area Richhai, Flat No 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 & 14 <strong>of</strong> Dhiraj Apartment situated atNarmada Road,Jabalpur.c. Equitable mortgage <strong>of</strong> property Situated at Block No 36, Plot 2/29, Pachpedi South CivilLines, Jabalpur.F-20


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE VIII : SUMMARY STATEMENT OF UNSECURED LOANS, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsAs at March 31<strong>Interest</strong> rate 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006Loan from <strong>Directors</strong>:Smt. Rekha Gupta 10% p.a - - - 1.58 1.31Loan from Associates:Commercial Automobiles Private Ltd. 10% p.a 3.01 - 6.47 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobiles 10% p.a - - - 0.06 0.74Commercial Automobiles (Ghana) - - - - *0.00Commercial Automobiles (Car workshop) - - - - 0.05Loans from Others: - - - - -Deferment <strong>of</strong> Sales Tax Refer Note (2) - - - 0.95 4.11-Total 3.01 - 6.47 2.59 6.21* Rs. 2,000.00Notes:1. Loans from <strong>as</strong>sociates <strong>and</strong> directors are repayable on dem<strong>and</strong>2. Deferment <strong>of</strong> Sales tax w<strong>as</strong> a scheme <strong>of</strong> Sales tax department (Madhya Pradesh) for promotion <strong>of</strong> industries located in declared schedule area.Under the scheme, deferment w<strong>as</strong> allowed on collection <strong>of</strong> Sales tax for 5 years from the date <strong>of</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> tax. The scheme w<strong>as</strong> interest free.F-21


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE IX: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF FIXED ASSETS, AS RESTATEDParticularsTangibleAssetsL<strong>and</strong>GrossBlockAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006DepreciationNetBlockGrossBlockDepreciationNetBlockGrossBlockDepreciationNetBlockGrossBlockDepreciationNetBlockGrossBlockDepreciation(Rs. in Millions)NetBlockLe<strong>as</strong>eholdL<strong>and</strong>FreeholdL<strong>and</strong>BuildingsFactoryBuildingNon-FactoryBuildingResidentialFlatPlant AndMachineryElectricalInstallationsFurniture<strong>and</strong> FixtureOfficeAppliances,Canteen <strong>and</strong>OtherEquipmentVehiclesComputers13.30 0.90 12.40 13.30 0.46 12.84 3.75 0.06 3.69 0.34 - 0.34 0.01 - 0.010.16 - 0.16 0.16 - 0.16 0.16 - 0.16 3.10 - 3.10 5.45 - 5.45- - - - - - - -106.61 22.60 84.01 98.93 13.73 85.20 36.22 9.86 26.36 9.53 4.43 5.10 4.65 4.07 0.581.55 0.95 0.60 1.75 1.09 0.66 1.53 1.03 0.50 0.89 0.49 0.40 1.17 0.61 0.560.64 0.54 0.10 0.64 0.53 0.11 0.64 0.52 0.12 0.74 0.56 0.18 0.74 0.55 0.19210.48 74.44 136.04 190.93 52.68 138.25 77.87 43.95 33.92 60.61 33.55 27.06 41.79 27.46 14.3311.17 3.84 7.33 10.23 2.02 8.21 2.45 1.17 1.28 0.76 0.52 0.24 0.67 0.50 0.171.97 1.32 0.65 1.70 1.06 0.64 1.03 0.75 0.28 1.25 1.01 0.24 1.10 0.89 0.212.75 1.53 1.22 2.32 1.38 0.94 1.94 0.95 0.99 1.06 0.63 0.43 0.74 0.56 0.187.69 3.05 4.64 6.38 3.08 3.30 4.31 2.22 2.09 3.18 1.11 2.07 2.87 1.37 1.506.72 4.89 1.84 5.71 4.56 1.15 4.50 3.64 0.86 3.03 2.42 0.61 2.28 1.87 0.41F-22


IntangibleAssetsComputerS<strong>of</strong>twareTotal (A)Capitalwork inprogress (B)Total(A+B)- - - - - - - - -1.77 0.67 1.10 0.21 0.08 0.13 0.21 0.01 0.20 - - - - - -364.82 114.73 250.09 332.26 80.67 251.59 134.61 64.16 70.45 84.49 44.72 39.77 61.47 37.88 23.59- - 199.55 - - 73.51 - - 77.16 - - 10.81 - - 8.26364.82 114.73 449.64 332.26 80.67 325.10 134.61 64.16 147.61 84.49 44.72 50.58 61.47 37.88 31.85F-23


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE X: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEBTORS, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)As at March 31Particulars2010 2009 2008 2007 2006Sundry Debtors(Unsecured)Debts outst<strong>and</strong>ing for period exceeding sixmonths:Considered good 32.94 11.32 7.44 4.03 2.64Considered Doubtful 0.11 0.30 1.19 - -Other Debts:33.05 11.62 8.63 4.03 2.64Unsecured, Considered good 549.54 138.25 238.21 349.90 128.08Unsecured, Considered Doubtful - - - - -549.54 138.25 238.21 349.90 128.08Less: Provision 0.11 0.30 1.19 - -549.43 137.95 237.02 349.90 128.08Total 582.48 149.57 245.65 353.93 130.72Note:Amounts due from concerns in which 3.23 1.09 28.89 0.29 35.03F-24


<strong>Directors</strong> are interested<strong>as</strong> <strong>Directors</strong>, Partners, or otherwiseF-25


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XI : SUMMARY STATEMENT OF LOANS AND ADVANCES, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006Loans <strong>and</strong> advances(Unsecured)Advances recoverable in c<strong>as</strong>h or in kind or forvalue to be received134.96 101.64 77.88 103.62 11.34Less: Provision 1.58 1.92 1.59 - -133.38 99.72 76.29 103.62 11.34Staff Loans <strong>and</strong> Advances 1.33 1.13 1.87 1.74 0.80Balance with Excise Authorities 175.94 148.02 82.84 59.48 21.86Statutory payment under protest 35.53 20.56 5.48 2.86 2.43Advance payment <strong>of</strong> Income-tax (Net <strong>of</strong>provision)4.96 4.18 1.62 1.04 1.27Advance payment <strong>of</strong> Fringe Benefits Tax(Net <strong>of</strong> provision)0.10 0.08 0.08 - -TOTAL 351.24 273.69 168.18 168.74 37.70Notes:Advances receivable in c<strong>as</strong>h or kind or forvalue to be received includesdue from Director <strong>and</strong> concerns in which<strong>Directors</strong> are interested <strong>as</strong><strong>Directors</strong>, Partners or otherwise47.87 59.33 56.90 76.38 0.36F-26


Staff loans includes amount due fromdirectors- - 0.18 0.76 -Maximum amount outst<strong>and</strong>ing from <strong>Directors</strong>any time during the year- - 1.07 2.21 -Loan to AssociatesAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006(Rs. In Millions)1. Commercial Auto Centre 16.99 17.04 15.73 13.91 0.342. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Ltd. - 12.04 32.24 55.17 -3. Commercial Body Builders 6.16 5.93 5.30 2.48 -4. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Ltd. 0.17 0.74 0.69 0.88 -5. Commercial Automobiles Private Ltd. - 1.10 - 0.79 0.016. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Ltd. 24.51 22.48 0.08 - -7. Shivam Motors Private Ltd. - - 2.86 2.45 -8. Commercial Motors Sales Ltd. - - - 0.70 0.01Total 47.83 59.33 56.90 76.38 0.36Note: The above loans are repayable on dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> interest is charged@ 10% p.a.F-27


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XII: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF CASH AND BANK BALANCES, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006C<strong>as</strong>h in h<strong>and</strong> 0.99 0.68 0.25 0.12 0.33Balance with Scheduled BanksIn Current Accounts 10.11 25.35 34.37 23.68 4.00C<strong>as</strong>h Credit / Bank Overdraft 0.03 0.01 - - -In Fixed Deposit Accounts (Refer Note 2below)23.24 11.41 176.78 11.05 1.18Total 34.37 37.45 211.40 34.85 5.51Note:1. Deposit receipts are under lien with bankagainst Credit facilities, Bank Guarantee.21.45 11.41 80.00 11.05 1.182. Accrued <strong>Interest</strong> Included in Fixed Deposits 1.34 0.15 8.17 0.18 -3. Also refer notes in Annexure VII with reference to C<strong>as</strong>h Credit Accounts with Banks.F-28


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XIII: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF INVENTORIES, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006InventoriesRaw Materials 263.37 113.29 175.11 197.66 92.14Work -in-Process 261.18 169.43 76.23 57.83 10.02Stores <strong>and</strong> Spares 8.62 5.94 5.95 7.56 3.83Finished Stock - - 0.48 - -Scrap 1.16 0.73 0.13 3.75 0.45Total 534.33 289.39 257.90 266.80 106.44F-29


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XIV: STATEMENT OF SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS,AS RESTATEDParticularsAs at March 31(Rs. in Millions)InvestmentsNo. <strong>of</strong> Shares2010 2009 2008 2007 2006AmountNo. <strong>of</strong>SharesAmountNo. <strong>of</strong>SharesAmountNo. <strong>of</strong>SharesAmountNo. <strong>of</strong>SharesAmount(At Cost) (Non-trade)Long Term Investments (Quoted )Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10/- each fullypaid-up <strong>of</strong> Tirupati Services Limited30,000 0.08 30,000 0.08 30,000 0.08 25,000 0.06 25,000 0.06Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs.10/- each fullypaid-up <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto FinanceLimitedLess - Provision for Diminution invalue <strong>of</strong> InvestmentLong Term Investments(Unquoted )Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs.10/- each fullypaid-up <strong>of</strong> Tirupati Equipment Pvt.Ltd., KanpurEquity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs.100/- each fullypaid-up <strong>of</strong> Shivam Motors Ltd.,KanpurEquity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs.100/- each fullypaid-up <strong>of</strong> Integrated OfficeMachines Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi112,575 0.72 112,575 0.72 112,575 0.72 86,650 0.67 86,450 0.67(0.38) - - - -0.34 0.72 0.72 0.67 0.67- - - -- - - - -120,000 1.20 120,000 1.20 120,000 1.20 120,000 1.20 120,000 1.20- - - - - 27,500 2.75- - - - 10,000 0.10 10,000 0.10F-30


Equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs.10/- each fullypaid-up <strong>of</strong> Saionara Foods LimitedLess - Provision for Diminution invalue <strong>of</strong> InvestmentEquity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs.100/- each fullypaid-up <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors FinanceLimitedLess - Provision for Diminution invalue <strong>of</strong> Investment1,000 Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs.10/- eachfully paid-up <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Pvt.Ltd.26,000 0.26 26,000 0.26 26,000 0.26 - -(0.26) (0.26) (0.26) - -- - - - -62,920 6.29 62,920 6.29 62,920 6.29 - -(1.58) (1.58) (1.58) - -4.71 4.71 4.71 -1,000 0.01 1,000 0.01 1,000 0.01Total 6.34 6.72 6.72 2.03 4.78Notes:Aggregate <strong>of</strong> quoted InvestmentCost 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.73 0.72Market Value (Refer Notes below) 1.16 0.58 1.08 1.07Aggregate <strong>of</strong> unquoted InvestmentCost 5.93 5.93 5.93 1.30 4.05Notes:1. Market value <strong>of</strong> Tirupati Services Limited is not available for the year ended March 31, 2010, 2009 <strong>and</strong> 2008.2. Market value <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited is not available for the year ended March 31, 2010.F-31


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XV: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF CURRENT LIABILITIES AND PROVISIONS, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006Current liabilitiesSundry CreditorsTotal outst<strong>and</strong>ing dues <strong>of</strong> Micro Enterprises<strong>and</strong> Small Enterprises (Refer Note B(10) to 1.53 4.47 2.65 - -Annexure IV)Total outst<strong>and</strong>ing dues <strong>of</strong> creditors other thanMicro Enterprises <strong>and</strong> Small Enterprises599.15 455.72 198.89 295.14 123.21<strong>Interest</strong> accrued but not due 0.02 0.03 0.02 - -Other Liabilities 31.18 25.25 19.02 45.37 15.68Total 631.88 485.47 220.58 340.51 138.89ProvisionsFor Leave Enc<strong>as</strong>hment 3.28 2.01 1.21 0.90 0.52For Gratuity 0.68 2.31 0.60 2.08 4.66For Income tax (net <strong>of</strong> advances) 57.21 0.29 10.01 17.49 6.28For Fringe benefits tax (net <strong>of</strong> advances) - 0.11 0.04 - -Total 61.17 4.72 11.86 20.47 11.46F-32


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XVI: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF INCOME FROM OPERATIONS, AS RESTATEDParticularsIncome from Sales <strong>and</strong> Operations(Including Excise duty)For the year ended March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006(Rs. in Millions)Sale <strong>of</strong> Built Bodies 2,234.45 1,707.09 1,984.85 1,658.13 759.15Other Products 0.50 1.18 2.38 5.86 40.66Job Work Charges 174.68 - - - -TOTAL 2,409.63 1,708.27 1,987.22 1,663.99 799.82F-33


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XVII: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF OTHER INCOME, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsFor the year ended March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006<strong>Interest</strong> :Nature- On Deposits 2.08 12.55 12.10 0.20 0.05 Recurring- On Others 5.81 6.63 5.14 2.06 2.31 Recurring7.89 19.18 17.24 2.26 2.36Freight Income 15.81 14.49 17.25 13.42 6.34 RecurringSale <strong>of</strong> Scrap 14.37 11.24 14.86 6.99 4.23 RecurringExchange Rate Fluctuations (Net) 7.14 - 0.16 0.04 - Non RecurringExcess provision for earlier yearswritten back0.27 0.02 0.24 0.02 0.89 Non RecurringProvision for doubtful debts <strong>and</strong>advances written back0.52 0.93 - - - Non RecurringShare <strong>of</strong> Loss in Joint Venturetransferred (Refer Note B(4) <strong>of</strong>0.56 - - - - Non RecurringAnnexure IV)Provident Fund Refund - - 5.80 - - Non RecurringPr<strong>of</strong>it on sales <strong>of</strong> fixed <strong>as</strong>sets (Net) - - 0.19 1.67 *0.00 Non RecurringMiscellaneous Income 1.32 1.90 1.93 2.09 2.74 Non RecurringTotal 47.88 47.76 57.67 26.49 16.56F-34


TDS deducted on <strong>Interest</strong> 2.04 4.16 3.33 0.22 -* Rs. 1,000.00F-35


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XVIII: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF MANUFACTURING EXPENSES, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsFor the year ended March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006Raw Materials Consumed 1,195.04 992.53 887.03 713.76 361.87Less: Sale <strong>of</strong> Raw Material 14.54 70.60 9.73 7.03 1.921,180.50 921.93 877.30 706.73 359.95Stores <strong>and</strong> Spares Consumed 93.59 67.94 61.81 53.96 26.05Less: Sale <strong>of</strong> Stores <strong>and</strong> Spares - - 3.78 - -93.59 67.94 58.03 53.96 26.05Power <strong>and</strong> Fuel 13.54 9.51 8.98 7.62 5.75Labour Charges 93.03 40.84 46.84 37.64 25.72Entry Tax (Refer Note B(3) <strong>of</strong>Annexure IV)- - 0.01 10.38 4.71Excise Duty 0.11 0.06 (0.52) 0.53 0.06Repairs <strong>and</strong> Maintenance :Building 0.80 1.19 1.81 0.42 0.84Plant <strong>and</strong> Machinery 3.51 3.90 2.32 1.55 1.19Others 4.98 4.23 2.31 2.26 0.97Total 1,390.06 1,049.60 997.08 821.09 425.24F-36


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XIX: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION AND BENEFITS, AS RESTATED(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsFor the year ended March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006Salaries, Wages <strong>and</strong> Bonus etc. 65.51 48.93 37.88 26.54 19.78Contribution to Provident Fund <strong>and</strong> other Funds 4.84 3.79 4.09 2.60 7.24Staff Welfare Expenses 3.50 2.63 2.69 2.22 1.76Total 73.85 55.35 44.66 31.36 28.78F-37


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XX: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF OPERATING AND OTHER EXPENSES, AS RESTATEDParticularsFor the year ended March 31(Rs. in Millions)2010 2009 2008 2007 2006Insurance 0.54 0.89 0.72 0.53 0.25Rent, Rates <strong>and</strong> Taxes 6.71 1.06 0.90 2.76 4.82Vehicle Expenses 1.72 2.24 2.08 2.43 1.96Travelling <strong>and</strong> Conveyance 9.11 8.53 8.17 5.11 3.33Postage, Telegram <strong>and</strong> Telephones 1.36 1.10 1.18 1.10 0.80Printing <strong>and</strong> Stationery 0.96 0.82 0.82 0.93 0.62Fixed Assets written <strong>of</strong>f 0.02 0.34 0.27 - -Loss on sale <strong>of</strong> Fixed Assets (Net) 0.13 0.40 - - -Exchange Rate Fluctuations (Net) - 2.86 - - -Capital Work in Progress written <strong>of</strong>f - 5.41 - - -Freight Charges 21.68 15.53 17.21 14.78 6.73Provision for Doubtful Advances - 0.33 1.59 - -Provision for Doubtful Debts - 0.05 1.01 - -Bad Debts <strong>and</strong> advances written <strong>of</strong>f 0.70 0.93 - - *0.00Provision for Diminution in value <strong>of</strong> Investment 0.38 - - - -Legal <strong>and</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional fees 7.88 2.46 13.42 2.18 1.05Discount Received 18.30 3.59 - - -Filling Fees 2.62 - - - -F-38


Long-term Investment written <strong>of</strong>f - - 0.10 - -Selling Expenses 11.32 6.92 7.83 4.05 3.37Miscellaneous Expenses 8.65 9.14 6.99 4.09 1.40Total 92.08 62.60 62.29 37.96 24.33* Rs. 3,000.00F-39


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XXI: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF INTEREST AND FINANCE CHARGES, AS RESTATEDParticularsFor the year ended March 31(Rs. in Millions)2010 2009 2008 2007 2006<strong>Interest</strong>-On Term Loans 9.03 0.80 0.85 0.83 --On Working Capital Loans <strong>and</strong> C<strong>as</strong>hCredit Facilities31.19 32.65 28.99 18.52 6.89-On Vehicle Loans - - 0.01 - --On Others 8.70 7.66 11.56 2.82 1.39Finance Charges 19.40 12.68 3.71 2.89 1.41Total 68.32 53.79 45.12 25.06 9.69F-40


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XXII: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES, AS RESTATEDRelated party disclosures <strong>as</strong> required by AS-18, "Related Party Disclosures", are given below:(i) List <strong>of</strong> Related Partiesa. Entities having substantial interest in the Company· Shivam Motors Private Limited· Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-(workshop)· Commercial Automobiles Private Limited· Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD)· Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (Car Workshop)· Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (Car Division)· Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (H.P.Division)· Commercial Body Builders Company Private Limited· Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Company Private Limited, Bangalore· Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Company Private Limited, Kanpur· Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Company Private Limited, Pune· Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited· Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors, Kanpur· Commercial Auto Centre, katni· Commercial Auto Centre, Ghana· Commercial Auto Stores, Delhi· Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobiles· Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance Private Limited· Commercial Motors Sales Private Limited· Commercial Toyota· Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited· Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders· Tirupati Equipments Private LimitedF-41


. Key Management Personnel <strong>and</strong> their relatives· Mr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta· Mr. Ajay Gupta· Mrs. Rekha Gupta· Mr. Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong> GuptaTransactions undertaken/balances outst<strong>and</strong>ing with the related parties:Sr. No.ParticularsAs at March 31(Rs. In Millions)2010 2009 2008 2007 20061 Loans / Advance TakenShivam Motors Private Limited 1.56 - - 16.90 -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited 1.28 - - 8.04 2.35Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD) 3.01 - 24.98 - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Carworkshop- 0.01 - - 0.01Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - - - - 1.10Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-H.P.Division- - - - 0.09Commercial Body Builders - - - - 0.39Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Jabalpur - - - - 0.80Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited - 0.39 - - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Bangalore - - 0.60 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited - - - 0.11 0.01Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motor, Kanpur - 0.02 - 0.40 -Commercial Auto Center Katni - - - 0.04 -F-42


Commercial Auto Center Ghana - - - 17.01 18.33Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobile - - - 1.41 -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motor Finance - - - 0.40 -Commercial Motors Sales Private Limited - - - 0.00 -Smt. Rekha Gupta - - - 0.27 1.312 Loans repaidShivam Motors Private Limited 0.34 - - 16.90 -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited - - - 7.26 2.35Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - - - - 1.11Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-H.P.Division- - - - 0.09Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motor, Kanpur - - - 0.40 -Commercial Auto Center Katni - - - 0.04 -Commercial Auto Center Ghana - - - 17.01 24.63Commercial Body Builders - - - - 0.39Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Jabalpur - - - - 0.63Commercial Motors Sales Private Limited - - - 0.00 -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Carworkshop- 0.01 - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD) - 6.47 17.70 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited - 0.05 - - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited - - - 0.11 0.01Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motor Finance - - - 0.40 -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobiles - - 0.06 1.35 -Smt. Rekha Gupta - - 1.58 - -F-43


Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Bangalore - - 0.14 - -3 Loans givenShivam Motors Private Limited 1.20 33.55 28.54 21.48 3.15Commercial Auto Sales - - - 0.00 2.51Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - 0.00 - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD) 1.67 4.23 31.10 - -Commercial Auto Centre - 1.55 4.04 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited-Kanpur - 0.64 14.69 - -Commercial Auto Center Ghana 1.40 - - 63.25 14.41Commercial Automobiles Private Limited - 0.00 0.09 29.38 14.58Commercial Motors Sales Private Limited - - - - 0.01Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited - 21.89 0.10 - 4.52Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motor, Kanpur - - - 0.01 -Mr. Ajay Gupta - - 0.13 - -Commercial Body Builders - - 4.06 3.50 0.50Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobile - - - - 5.50Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders - - - - 4.50Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Bangalore - - 8.12 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Jabalpur - - - - 51.95Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Pune - - 9.42 - -Commercial Toyota - - - 1.70 -Mr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta - - 0.05 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited - - - 2.12 -F-44


Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motor Finance - - - 0.01 -4 Loan received backShivam Motors Private Limited 1.20 64.56 28.49 22.46 1.51Commercial Auto Sales - - - 0.00 2.51Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - 0.00 - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD) 2.83 3.14 31.09 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited 0.23 0.76 0.00 - 4.52Commercial Auto Centre 2.90 1.68 3.24 50.34 13.89Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motor, Kanpur - - - 0.01 -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motor Finance - - - 0.01 -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Kanpur 2.57 3.29 - - -Commercial Body Builders - - 5.83 1.37 0.50Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Pune - 9.42 - - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobile - - - - 5.50Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders - - - - 4.50Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited-Bangalore - 8.10 - - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Jabalpur - - - - 31.40Commercial Automobiles Private Limited - 0.00 0.83 32.81 10.51Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited 0.60 - 0.24 1.29 -Commercial Toyota - - 0.70 1.00 -5 Rent Paid (Le<strong>as</strong>e Rent)/Hire ChargesKail<strong>as</strong>h Motor, Kanpur 0.06 0.05 0.06 - -Commercial Body Builders 0.06 0.06 0.11 0.06 0.06F-45


Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Company Private Limited,Jabalpur- - - - 4.40Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - - - - 0.04Commercial Motors Sales Private Limited - - - - 0.246 <strong>Interest</strong> paidKail<strong>as</strong>h Motor, Kanpur - 0.00 - - -Smt. Rekha Gupta - - 0.08 - -Commercial Auto Center - - - - 0.42Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - - - - 0.017 <strong>Interest</strong> ReceivedShivam Motors Private Limited - 2.47 1.24 0.16 0.01Commercial Automobiles Private Limited - - - 0.84 0.05Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD) 0.09 0.32 0.39 - -Commercial Auto Center 1.60 1.45 1.33 0.80 -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited 1.09 0.81 - - -Commercial Body Builders 0.58 0.53 0.46 0.16 0.01Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Company Private Limited,Jabalpur- - - - 2.00Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Private Limited 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.05 -8Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited 2.25 1.27 - - -Reimbursement <strong>of</strong> Expenses from GroupCompaniesShivam Motors Private Limited 0.14 0.37 - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Carworkshop0.26 0.04 - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - 0.00 - 0.04 0.01F-46


Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD) - 0.01 - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-H.P.Division - - - - 0.11Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motor, Kanpur 0.06 0.02 - 0.00 0.02Commercial Automobiles Private Limited, Jabalpur - - - 0.01 -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (W'Shop) - - 0.15 0.05 -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited 0.13 - 0.05 0.12 0.06Commercial Toyota 0.04 - - - -Commercial Body Builders 0.06Commercial Motors, Dehradoon - - 0.05 - -9 Rent/Hire Income ReceivedKail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Pune 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05Commercial Body Builders - 0.35 0.36 0.35 -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Bangalore 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03Rekha Engineering Works 0.35Commercial Automobiles Private Limited 0.03Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited 0.0710 Sale <strong>of</strong> Finished GoodsShivam Motors Private Limited 22.63 27.87 20.29 3.55 3.84Commercial Automobiles Private Limited Ghana 20.56 - - - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited - 0.41 0.20 - -Commercial Auto Sales Private Limited - 0.29 - - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited Bangalore - 0.03 0.44 - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Debtor A/cJabalpur- 10.34 - 3.68 0.76F-47


Commercial Automobiles Private Limited Jabalpur - - 10.59 0.90 1.70Shivam Motors Private Limited - - - 11.52 9.58Commercial Auto Sales - - - 3.70 3.20Commercial Motors Sales Private Limited - - - 0.27 -11 Sale <strong>of</strong> Raw MaterialShivam Motors Private Limited 0.03 0.12 0.06 - 0.00Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Ghana WorkShop- 0.13 - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD) 0.03 - - - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Pune 4.19 - 1.95 - -Commercial Auto mobiles Limited-W'Shop Ghana - 0.05 - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited - - 0.02 - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited (W'Shop)JBP- - 0.02 - -Commercial Body Builders Maneri - - 3.96 6.16 -Shivam Motors Private Limited - - - 0.16 -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - - - - 0.00Commercial Automobiles Private Limited - - - - 0.10Commercial Body Builders - - - - 0.02Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Bangalore - - - - 0.03Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Pune - - - - 0.05Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Jabalpur - - - - 4.68Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited, Jabalpur - - - - 0.0012 Purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Goods/ Capital goodsF-48


Shivam Motors Private Limited 0.38 0.53 0.41 - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Ghana 1.83 0.89 0.50 0.44 -Commercial Auto Stores, Delhi - 0.02 - - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited 0.13 0.14 1.28 - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited CVD 0.01 - - 0.20 1.10Tirupati Equipment Private Limited - - - - 0.74Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Bangalore - - - - 0.04Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Jabalpur - - - - 18.02Commercial Toyota 1.26 - - - -13Miscellaneous Expenses Incurred on behalf GroupCompaniesShivam Motors Private LimitedCommercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD) 0.00 - - - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Bangalore - 0.00 - - -Commercial Body Builders - 0.00 0.05 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders - - 0.01 - -Commercial Auto Centre 0.01 - - 0.00 -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited - - - 0.03 -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-(H.P.Division)- - - 0.01 -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited 0.03 - 0.03 - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - - - 0.08 -14 Managerial Remuneration (including commission)F-49


Mr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta 3.12 2.88 3.00 - -Mr. Ajay Gupta 13.20 7.44 8.43 6.71 2.67Mrs. Rekha Gupta - - - - 0.6015 Closing Balance : Receivable /(Payable)-As CreditorsCommercial Automobiles Private Limited-Carworkshop0.07 - - - -Commercial Toyota 1.30 - - - -Shivam Motors Private Limited 1.56 - - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Ghana WorkShop0.36 - - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited 1.28 - - - -Rekha Engineering Works 0.33 - - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Carworkshop- 0.05 - - -Commercial Auto Centre, Katni - 0.01 - - --As Unsecured Loans TakenRekha Gupta - - - 1.58 1.31Commercial Automobiles Private Limited 3.01 - 6.47 - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Ghana - - - - 0.00Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Carworkshop- - - - 0.05Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobile - - - 0.06 0.74-As DebtorsShivam Motors Private Limited - 0.95 28.15 0.29 6.13F-50


Commercial Automobiles Private Limited - 0.14 0.53 - 4.34Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog Limited - - 0.20 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Jabalpur - - - - 24.56-As Loans <strong>and</strong> Advances GivenCommercial Automobiles Private Limited (CVD) - 1.16 - - -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited - - - 0.79 -Commercial Auto Center 16.99 17.05 15.73 13.91 0.34Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Carworkshop- - 0.02 0.02 -Commercial Motors Sales Private Limited - - - 0.70 0.01Commercial Body Builders 6.31 - - 2.48 -Commercial Automobiles Private Limited-Car Division - - - - 0.01Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Kanpur 10.45 12.04 14.69 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited, Pune - - 9.42 - -Commercial Body Builders - 5.93 5.30 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Private Limited 0.17 0.74 0.69 0.88 0.00Kail<strong>as</strong>h Vahan Udyog 27.26 22.48 0.08 - -Shivam Motors Private Limited - - 2.86 2.45 -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited Banglore - - 8.13 - -Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited Jabalpur - - - 55.17 -Mr. Ajay Gupta - - 0.13 0.76 -Mr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Ch<strong>and</strong> Gupta - - 0.05 - -F-51


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XXIII: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF CONTINGENT LIABILITIES, AS RESTATED(Rs. In Millions)ParticularsAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006Disputed dem<strong>and</strong>s forIncome tax 1.85 3.63 3.63 3.63 3.63Excise duty 172.74 94.88 1.37 1.38 1.38Sales tax - - - - -Entry Tax - 0.47 - - -Total 174.59 98.98 5.00 5.01 5.01OthersBank Guarantee(given <strong>as</strong> performance guarantee)29.36 5.34 6.32 1.00 -Letters <strong>of</strong> Credit (L/C) 1.27 2.65 - - -Details <strong>of</strong> duty paid under protestExcise duty paid under protest 1.64 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37Sales tax paid under protest - 0.28 0.07 1.10 1.05Entry tax paid under protest(Also Refer Note B(3) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV)33.89 18.86 2.94 - -F-52


Total 35.53 20.51 4.38 2.47 2.42F-53


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XXIV: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF CAPITALISATION, AS RESTATED(Rs. In Millions)ParticularsAs at March 31, 2010 As adjusted for Issue #BorrowingsShort term 438.70 438.70Long Term debt 105.97 105.97Total debt 544.67 544.67Shareholders' fundsShare capital 428.96 1,958.96Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account 280.90 280.90Total shareholders' funds 709.87 2,239.86Long-term Debt / Equity ratio 0.15 0.05Total Short term Debt/ Equity ratio 0.62 0.20# Post Issue figures include the effect <strong>of</strong> Fresh Issue <strong>of</strong> 12,047,244 Equity Shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each at a premium <strong>of</strong> Rs. 117 each, which are in the process <strong>of</strong> beingissued.Note:The figures disclosed above are b<strong>as</strong>ed on the Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Assets <strong>and</strong> Liabilities, <strong>as</strong> Re<strong>stated</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2010F-54


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XXV: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF TAX SHELTERS, AS RESTATEDParticularsAs at March 31(Rs. In Millions)2010 2009 2008 2007 2006Pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> A 310.56 26.47 99.64 111.04 35.64Tax rate % (including surcharge <strong>and</strong> cess, <strong>as</strong>applicable)B 33.99% 33.99% 33.99% 33.66% 33.66%Tax at notional rate C=A*B 105.56 9.00 33.87 37.38 12.00Adjustments:Permanent DifferencesPenalty - - - - *0.00Others 3.29 - 1.77 (1.67) (0.43)Total D 3.29 - 1.77 (1.67) (0.43)Timing Difference :Tax depreciation <strong>and</strong> book value depreciation (0.64) (7.04) (1.80) (0.49) 0.07Gratuity <strong>and</strong> Leave Enc<strong>as</strong>hment (2.11) - - - (2.51)Brought Forward Losses (Refer Note no. 2below)- - - (37.58) -Others 4.14 7.49 6.23 (2.36) (0.60)Total E 1.40 0.45 4.43 (40.43) (3.04)F-55


Net Adjustments F=D+E 4.68 0.45 6.20 (42.10) (3.47)Tax Expenses / (Saving) Thereon G=F*B 1.59 0.15 2.11 (14.17) (1.17)Net Tax Expenses Thereon H=C+G 107.15 9.15 35.98 23.20 10.83Taxable Income I=A+F 315.25 26.92 105.84 68.95 32.17Note1) The above working is b<strong>as</strong>ed on the Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> for the respective years.2) Pursuant to scheme <strong>of</strong> arrangement, brought forward losses <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited-Jabalpur Unithave been claimed in the Return <strong>of</strong> income (Refer Note B (1) (III) (C) <strong>of</strong> Annexure IV to the Summary Statements*Rs. 1,000.00F-56


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)ANNEXURE XXVI: SUMMARY STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTING RATIOS, AS RESTATEDAs at March 31Particulars2010 2009 2008 2007 20061) Adjusted Pr<strong>of</strong>it to income fromoperation (%)12.32% 1.57% 5.15% 7.49% 4.42%2) (a) B<strong>as</strong>ic earning per share Rs. 4.48 0.41 1.66 4.72 2.53(b) Diluted earning per share Rs. 4.48 0.41 1.55 4.72 2.533) C<strong>as</strong>h earning per share Rs. 5.32 0.80 1.91 5.13 2.824) Net <strong>as</strong>set value per share Rs. 16.59 12.12 13.62 9.64 7.145) Return on Net Worth (%) 26.97% 3.35% 12.22% 48.93% 35.39%6) No. <strong>of</strong> Shares* (Refer Note 2 below)(a) Weighted Average no. <strong>of</strong> shares-B<strong>as</strong>ic Earning per shareAdd : Potential Equity Shares (ReferNote 3 below)42,895,720 42,895,720 36,872,50018,051,2509,905,000- - 2,656,220 - -F-57


(b) Weighted Average no. <strong>of</strong> shares-Diluted Earning per share42,895,720 42,895,720 39,528,72018,051,2509,905,000* Equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs.10 EachNotes:1) The ratios have been computed <strong>as</strong>follows:Adjusted Pr<strong>of</strong>it to income from operation% = Adjusted pr<strong>of</strong>it before taxIncome from operationsEarning per Share - B<strong>as</strong>ic <strong>and</strong> Diluted =C<strong>as</strong>h Earning per Share =Net Asset Value per Share =Return on Net Worth =Adjusted Pr<strong>of</strong>it / (Loss) after Tax butbefore Extraordinary ItemsWeighted average number <strong>of</strong> equityshares outst<strong>and</strong>ing during the yearAdjusted Pr<strong>of</strong>it after Tax but beforeDepreciationWeighted Average Number <strong>of</strong> EquityShares Outst<strong>and</strong>ing during the yearNet Worth excluding RevaluationReserveWeighted Average Number <strong>of</strong> EquityShares Outst<strong>and</strong>ing during the yearAdjusted Pr<strong>of</strong>it / (Loss) after Tax butbefore Extraordinary ItemsNet Worth excluding RevaluationReserve2) Earnings per share h<strong>as</strong> been calculated in accordance with Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ard 20 - Earnings Per Share (AS-20). VideF-58


Resolution p<strong>as</strong>sed at the Shareholders Meeting held on March 18, 2010, the Company h<strong>as</strong> sub-divided each share <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100 eachinto 10 shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 each. Further, post sub-division <strong>of</strong> shares shareholders also approved at the same meeting Bonus issue <strong>of</strong>36,767,760 Equity shares by capitalization <strong>of</strong> securities premium account <strong>and</strong> balance in pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> loss account. As per AS 20the effect <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid share split <strong>and</strong> bonus issue h<strong>as</strong> been considered while working out weighted average number <strong>of</strong> Equityshares for calculating B<strong>as</strong>ic <strong>and</strong> diluted earning per share for the year ended March 31, 2010 <strong>and</strong> all the previous years presented.3) In calculating diluted earnings per share for the year ended March 31, 2008, the effect <strong>of</strong> m<strong>and</strong>atorily convertible preferenceshares till the date <strong>of</strong> actual conversion is considered.4) Re<strong>stated</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it / (loss) have been considered for the purpose <strong>of</strong> computing the above ratios.F-59


COMMERCIAL ENGINEERS & BODY BUILDERS CO. LIMITED(Formerly known <strong>as</strong> Commercial Engineers & Body Builders Co Private Limited)Annexure IVSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NOTES TO RESTATED SUMMARYSTATEMENTSA. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES :(a)B<strong>as</strong>is for preparation <strong>of</strong> accounts:(b)The accompanying financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles in India <strong>and</strong> the Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards notifiedunder the Companies (Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards) Rules, 2006.Use <strong>of</strong> Estimates:The preparation <strong>of</strong> financial statements, in conformity with the generally accepted accounting principles,requires estimates <strong>and</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumptions to be made that affect the reported amounts <strong>of</strong> <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>and</strong> liabilities onthe date <strong>of</strong> financial statements <strong>and</strong> the reported amounts <strong>of</strong> revenues <strong>and</strong> expenses during the reportedperiod. Differences between the actual results <strong>and</strong> estimates are recognized in the period in which the resultsare known/materialized.(c)Fixed Assets:(d)Fixed <strong>as</strong>sets are <strong>stated</strong> at cost net <strong>of</strong> Cenvat. Costs includes all cost incurred to bring the <strong>as</strong>sets to theirworking condition <strong>and</strong> location.The company capitalizes s<strong>of</strong>tware <strong>and</strong> related implementation costs, where it is re<strong>as</strong>onably estimated that thes<strong>of</strong>tware h<strong>as</strong> an enduring useful life.Depreciation <strong>and</strong> amortization:(i) Depreciation is provided using the written-down method b<strong>as</strong>ed on estimated useful life <strong>of</strong> the <strong>as</strong>sets. Thedepreciation rates, b<strong>as</strong>ed on management’ estimates, used are <strong>as</strong> follows:Block <strong>of</strong> AssetsDepreciation rateFactory Building 10%Non-Factory Building 10%Residential Flat 5%Plant <strong>and</strong> Machinery 15% - 100%Office Equipments 15%Computers 60%Vehicles 25.89%Electrical Installations 20%Furniture <strong>and</strong> Fixtures 18.10%(ii) Le<strong>as</strong>ehold l<strong>and</strong> is amortized over the period <strong>of</strong> le<strong>as</strong>e on pro rata b<strong>as</strong>is.(iii) Depreciation on <strong>as</strong>sets acquired/purch<strong>as</strong>ed during the year is provided on pro-rata b<strong>as</strong>is from the date <strong>of</strong>each addition.(iv) Assets having value <strong>of</strong> Rs.5,000/- or less are charged <strong>of</strong>f fully in the year <strong>of</strong> purch<strong>as</strong>e.(v)Computer S<strong>of</strong>tware is amortized over the period <strong>of</strong> three years.F-60


(e)Impairment <strong>of</strong> Assets:At the end <strong>of</strong> each period, the company determines whether a provision should be made for impairment losson fixed <strong>as</strong>sets by considering the indications that an impairment loss may have occurred in accordance withAccounting St<strong>and</strong>ard 28 on ‘‘Impairment <strong>of</strong> Assets’’ . Where the recoverable amount <strong>of</strong> any fixed <strong>as</strong>set islower than its carrying amount, a provision for impairment loss on fixed <strong>as</strong>sets is made for the difference.(f)Revenue recognition:Revenue from sale <strong>of</strong> built bodies is recognised when products are despatched <strong>and</strong> all significant risks <strong>and</strong>rewards <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> the products are transferred to the customers.Revenue from service contracts is recognised when the services are completed.(g)Inventories:Inventories are valued at lower <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>and</strong> net realisable value. The cost <strong>of</strong> inventories is arrived at on thefollowing b<strong>as</strong>is:Raw materials: On FIFO b<strong>as</strong>is (net <strong>of</strong> Cenvat)Work-in-progress : On weighted average b<strong>as</strong>is including direct factory overheadsFinished goods : On weighted average b<strong>as</strong>is, attributable overheads <strong>and</strong> Excise dutyStores <strong>and</strong> spares: On FIFO b<strong>as</strong>is(h)Foreign currency transactions:(i)Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the exchange rates prevailing on the date <strong>of</strong> transaction.Monetary items are translated at the period-end rates. The exchange difference between the rate prevailing onthe date <strong>of</strong> transaction <strong>and</strong> on the date <strong>of</strong> settlement <strong>as</strong> also on translation <strong>of</strong> monetary items at the end <strong>of</strong> theperiod is recognized <strong>as</strong> income or expense, <strong>as</strong> the c<strong>as</strong>e may be.Employee Benefits:(a)Post Employment Benefits <strong>and</strong> Other Long Term Benefits:i) Contributions under Defined Contribution Plans in the form <strong>of</strong> Provident Fund are recognized inthe Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account in the period in which the employee h<strong>as</strong> rendered the service.ii) Defined Benefit <strong>and</strong> Other Long term Benefit Plans :The Company’s Liability towards Defined Benefit Plan in the form <strong>of</strong> Gratuity is funded throughscheme administered by the Life Insurance Corporation <strong>of</strong> India (LIC) <strong>and</strong> administered throughrespective Trusts set-up by the Company. The liability is determined on the b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> actuarialvaluation being carried out at each Balance Sheet date using the Projected Unit Credit Method.The liability for the Interim financial statements is calculated by management on the b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong>latest actuarial valuations. The retirement benefit obligation recognized in the Balance Sheetrepresents the total <strong>of</strong> present value <strong>of</strong> the defined benefit obligation <strong>as</strong> reduced by unrecognizedp<strong>as</strong>t service cost <strong>and</strong> the fair value <strong>of</strong> plan <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>as</strong> at the balance sheet date. Any <strong>as</strong>sets resultingfrom this calculation is restricted to the present value <strong>of</strong> available refunds from the plan orreductions in future contributions to the plan.F-61


Actuarial gains <strong>and</strong> losses are recognized immediately in the Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account in theperiod <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> such gains <strong>and</strong> losses. P<strong>as</strong>t service cost is recognized <strong>as</strong> an expense on <strong>as</strong>traight-line b<strong>as</strong>is over the average period until the benefits become vested to the extent that thebenefits are already vested immediately following the introduction <strong>of</strong> , or changes to, a definedbenefit plan, p<strong>as</strong>t service cost is recognized immediately.(b)Short Term Employee Benefits:Short-term employee benefits are recognized <strong>as</strong> expenses at the undiscounted amount in thePr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account <strong>of</strong> the period in which the related services are rendered.(j)Borrowing costs:Leave enc<strong>as</strong>hment is provided for on the b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> actual costs the Company expects to pay forthe compensated absences.Borrowing costs that are attributable to the acquisition or construction <strong>of</strong> qualifying <strong>as</strong>sets are capitalized <strong>as</strong>part <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> such <strong>as</strong>sets. A qualifying <strong>as</strong>set is one that necessarily takes a substantial period <strong>of</strong> time toget ready for its intended use or sale. All other borrowing costs are charged to revenue.(k)Income taxes:Tax expense comprises <strong>of</strong> current tax, deferred tax <strong>and</strong> fringe benefits tax. Current tax is me<strong>as</strong>ured at theamount expected to be paid to/ recovered from the tax authorities, using the applicable tax rates.Deferred tax reflect the current period timing differences between taxable income <strong>and</strong> accounting income forthe period <strong>and</strong> reversal <strong>of</strong> timing differences <strong>of</strong> earlier years/period. Deferred tax <strong>as</strong>sets are recognized only tothe extent that there is re<strong>as</strong>onable certainty that sufficient future income will be available except that deferredtax <strong>as</strong>sets, in c<strong>as</strong>e there are unabsorbed depreciation <strong>and</strong> losses, are recognized if there is virtual certainty thatsufficient future taxable income will be available to realize the sameFringe benefits tax is recognized in accordance with the relevant provisions <strong>of</strong> the Income- tax Act, 1961 <strong>and</strong>the Guidance Note on Fringe Benefits Tax issued by the Institute <strong>of</strong> Chartered Accountants <strong>of</strong> India.(l)Investments:Investments cl<strong>as</strong>sified <strong>as</strong> long-term investments are <strong>stated</strong> at costs. Provision is made to recognize a diminution,other than temporary, in the value <strong>of</strong> such investments. Investments cl<strong>as</strong>sified <strong>as</strong> current investments are <strong>stated</strong>at lower <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>and</strong> fair value.(m)Operating Le<strong>as</strong>esAssets taken on Le<strong>as</strong>e under which all significant risks <strong>and</strong> rewards <strong>of</strong> ownership are effectively retained by thelessor are cl<strong>as</strong>sified <strong>as</strong> Operating Le<strong>as</strong>es. Le<strong>as</strong>e payments under Operating Le<strong>as</strong>es are recognized <strong>as</strong> expenses <strong>as</strong>incurred in accordance with the respective Le<strong>as</strong>e Agreements.(n)Contingent Liabilities:These, if any, are disclosed in the notes <strong>and</strong> accounts. Provision is made in the accounts if it becomesprobable that any outflow <strong>of</strong> resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle theobligation.F-62


B. NOTES TO THE RESTATED SUMMARY STATEMENT:1. AdjustmentsI. The following adjustments have been made in the Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Assets <strong>and</strong> Liabilities,Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Losses <strong>and</strong> Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>h Flows <strong>as</strong> under:ParticularsFor the year ended March 31,(Rs. in Millions)2010 2009 2008 2007 2006Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax <strong>as</strong> per AuditedFinancial Statements (A) 202.99 14.09 65.21 71.58 21.74(I) Provident Fund Refund (ReferNote (a) below) - - (5.80) - 5.80(II) Sales Tax Dem<strong>and</strong>s/Refunds(Refer Note (b) below) 2.55 3.03 (0.74) 0.03 (2.20)(III) Income Tax- Short/ (Excess)Provision (Refer Note (c) below) (13.57) 0.30 2.72 13.57 (0.30)Total <strong>of</strong> Adjustments (B) (11.02) 3.33 (3.82) 13.60 3.30Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>(A+ B) 191.97 17.42 61.39 85.18 25.04Notes:a. Provident Fund Refund :In the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company had paid Rs. 5.8 millions towards dem<strong>and</strong> raised by theAssistant Provident Fund Commissioner (APFC), Jabalpur for alleged violation <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong>Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 which w<strong>as</strong> accounted <strong>as</strong> liability. The Company had filed anappeal against the order <strong>and</strong> during the year ended March 31, 2008 the Company received an Orderfrom the Tribunal which qu<strong>as</strong>hed the above order p<strong>as</strong>sed by APFC <strong>and</strong> directed it to refund the amountdeposited by the Company. Accordingly the same w<strong>as</strong> accounted <strong>as</strong> income for the year ended March31, 2008. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> restatement, the same h<strong>as</strong> been adjusted in the year to which it pertains.b. Sales Tax Dem<strong>and</strong>s/Refunds:The additional amounts dem<strong>and</strong>ed/refunds by the sales tax authorities on completion <strong>of</strong> <strong>as</strong>sessment <strong>of</strong>sales tax, central sales Tax, commercial tax have been adjusted in the respective years to which theypertain.c. Income Tax- Short/ (Excess) Provision:Adjustments are made in the respective years in respect <strong>of</strong> short/ excess provision for Income-tax on theb<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> income tax <strong>as</strong>sessments completed for the respective years.F-63


II.The effects <strong>of</strong> the following have not been given in the Summary Statements on the grounds thatthe figures involved are not material:a. Doubtful advances <strong>and</strong> bad debts written <strong>of</strong>f amounting to Rs. 0 .70 Million, Rs. 0.93 Million <strong>and</strong>Rs. 0.003 Million in the year ended March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009, <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2006 respectivelyhave not been adjusted in the year to which they pertain.b. Provision for doubtful debts <strong>and</strong> advances aggregating to Rs. 0.38 Million <strong>and</strong> Rs. 2.60 Millions for theyear ended March 31, 2009 <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2008 have not been adjusted in the year to which the debtspertain. Similarly, provision for doubtful debts <strong>and</strong> advances written back <strong>of</strong> Rs. 0.52 Million <strong>and</strong> Rs.0.93 Million for the year ended March 31, 2010 <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2009 have not been adjusted in the yearto which the debts pertain.c. Prior period expenses <strong>of</strong> Rs. 0.03 Million expensed in the year ended March 31, 2007 h<strong>as</strong> not beenadjusted to the year ended March 31, 2006 to which it pertain.d. Excess provision written back <strong>of</strong> Rs. 0.27 Million, Rs. 0.02 Million, Rs. 0.24 Million, Rs. 0.02 Million<strong>and</strong> 0.89 million written back in the year ended March 31, 2010, March 31, 2009, March 31, 2008,March 31, 2007 <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2006 respectively h<strong>as</strong> not been adjusted in the year to which they pertain.e. Also refer Note III (a) <strong>and</strong> (b) belowIII.Qualifications in Auditors’ Report:a. Depreciation:For the years ended March 31, 2006 <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2007, Auditors had qualified the Accounts inrelation to depreciation on fixed <strong>as</strong>sets which were being provided at the rates prescribed under IncometaxAct, 1961 instead <strong>of</strong> the rates provided in the Companies Act 1956. Further, the depreciation w<strong>as</strong>being charged on the fixed <strong>as</strong>sets for the aforesaid years on a ‘full year’ b<strong>as</strong>is for <strong>as</strong>sets acquired priorto September 30 <strong>of</strong> the respective year <strong>and</strong> on a ‘half year’ b<strong>as</strong>is for those <strong>as</strong>sets acquired afterSeptember 30 <strong>of</strong> the respective year.The above qualification w<strong>as</strong> resolved by the Management during the year ended March 31, 2008 byrevising the Management’s estimate <strong>of</strong> useful life <strong>of</strong> fixed <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>and</strong> accordingly the rates <strong>of</strong>depreciation for Furniture <strong>and</strong> Fixtures, Office Equipments <strong>and</strong> Vehicles were revised since the samewere lower than the rates specified in the Companies Act, 1956. For the other <strong>as</strong>sets the rates were keptunchanged in accordance with the Management’s estimate <strong>of</strong> useful life <strong>of</strong> such <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>as</strong> estimated inthe year ended March 31, 2008.Effect <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid resolution <strong>of</strong> qualification is not given in the Re<strong>stated</strong> Summary Statement <strong>as</strong> thesame is not material for the respective years.b. Provision for Gratuity:For the years ended March 31, 2006 <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2007, Auditors had qualified the Accounts withrespect to Gratuity which w<strong>as</strong> being provided on the b<strong>as</strong>is that all employees are retiring at the end <strong>of</strong>year instead <strong>of</strong> providing the same on actuarial b<strong>as</strong>is. The qualification w<strong>as</strong> resolved in year endedMarch 31, 2008 <strong>as</strong> follows:The Company adopted Revised Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ard 15 on “Employee Benefits” (AS 15 Revised)during the year ended March 31, 2008. On adoption <strong>of</strong> the Revised Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ard, excessprovision <strong>of</strong> Gratuity <strong>of</strong> Rs. 0.24 Million relating to Accounting periods ended before April 1, 2007 h<strong>as</strong>been written back in the Accounts in the said year end.F-64


The above write back h<strong>as</strong> not been adjusted in Re<strong>stated</strong> Summary Statement on the grounds that figureinvolved is not material.c. Merger <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited (Jabalpur Unit)For the year ended March 31, 2007 Auditors had qualified the Accounts with respect to non-merger <strong>of</strong>financials <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited- Jabalpur Unit in Company’s financial statements.This w<strong>as</strong> resolved subsequently <strong>as</strong> follows:The merger w<strong>as</strong> given effect to in the financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2008 <strong>and</strong>following disclosure w<strong>as</strong> made in Notes to Accounts to the said financial statements.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Builders Private Limited (KABPL) which is one <strong>of</strong> the Associate Group <strong>of</strong> the Companyw<strong>as</strong> declared a sick industrial company under Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 (SICA) on 23rdNovember, 2006. As per the Scheme <strong>of</strong> Arrangement for revival <strong>of</strong> KABPL filed with Board forIndustrial <strong>and</strong> Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) one <strong>of</strong> the manufacturing unit <strong>of</strong> KABPL located atJabalpur w<strong>as</strong> proposed to be merged with the Company taking cut-<strong>of</strong>f date <strong>as</strong> closing business hours <strong>of</strong>March 31, 2007. The Company in its General Meeting held on September 1, 2007 approved the saidscheme subject to sanction by BIFR.The BIFR approved the said scheme <strong>and</strong> the Order sanctioning the same w<strong>as</strong> received by the Companyon October 1, 2008 <strong>and</strong> intimated to the Registrar <strong>of</strong> Companies on December 16, 2008. As per theScheme <strong>of</strong> Arrangement, the merger <strong>of</strong> KABPL-Jabalpur Unit with the Company on a going concernb<strong>as</strong>is, h<strong>as</strong> been accounted in the books <strong>of</strong> the Company during the year March 31, 2008 in accordancewith the pooling <strong>of</strong> interest method <strong>as</strong> per Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ard 14 (AS-14) “Accounting forAmalgamations” with effect from the Appointed date i.e. closing business hours <strong>of</strong> March 31, 2007.IV. Balance <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> loss account, <strong>as</strong> Re<strong>stated</strong> <strong>as</strong> at April 1, 2005:Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss account <strong>as</strong> at April 1, 2005 <strong>as</strong> per Audited FinancialStatementsLess: Adjustment on account <strong>of</strong> restatements(Rs. in Millions)23.44Sales Tax Dem<strong>and</strong>s (Refer Note no. B(1)(I)(b) above) 2.67Income-tax short provision (Refer Note no. B(1)(I)(c) above) 2.72Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss account <strong>as</strong> at April 1, 2005, Re<strong>stated</strong> 18.052. Capital Commitments :The estimated amount <strong>of</strong> contracts remaining to be executed on capital account <strong>and</strong> not provided for(Net <strong>of</strong> advances)F-65


(Rs. in Millions)ParticularContracts to be executed onCapital Account <strong>and</strong> notprovided forAs at March 31,2010 2009 2008 2007 200615.28 74.77 8.27 7.50 -Note: The above figures are net <strong>of</strong> advances.3. The Company had challenged the constitutional validity <strong>of</strong> entry tax collected by State <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradeshon goods purch<strong>as</strong>ed from other states by filing a writ petition in Honorable High Court <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradeshon 30th August, 2007. The petition w<strong>as</strong> decided against the Company during the year ended March 31,2009. The Company had filed a special leave petition (SLP) before the Honorable Supreme Court, againchallenging the constitutional validity <strong>of</strong> Entry Tax. As per the interim order p<strong>as</strong>sed by Supreme Court, theCompany h<strong>as</strong> been directed to deposit the unpaid Entry tax before the petition is decided.The Company h<strong>as</strong> already deposited Entry tax aggregating to Rs.33.89 million (including <strong>Interest</strong> Rs 0.15million) for the period from April 2007 to June 2009 to the authorities, under protest (disclosed in AnnexureXI: Summary statement <strong>of</strong> Loan <strong>and</strong> Advances <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>). Balance amount <strong>of</strong> Entry tax payable for theperiod from July 2009 to March 2010 aggregates to Rs. 17.48 million, which h<strong>as</strong> been depositedsubsequently, under protest.The Supreme Court h<strong>as</strong> transferred the above SLP to Higher Bench before the Chief Justice <strong>of</strong> the SupremeCourt <strong>of</strong> India for decision, which is yet pending. The Company is hopeful that the matter will be decided inits favor <strong>and</strong> hence no provision for the above is required in the accounts at this stage.4. During the year ended March 31, 2010, the Company h<strong>as</strong> entered into an agreement with a party for thepurpose <strong>of</strong> engaging into a Jointly Controlled Operations (JCO) to manufacture market <strong>and</strong> sell fabricatedautomobile bodies <strong>and</strong> components to Original Equipment Manufacturers <strong>and</strong> to other customers, atJamshedpur. Per the agreement the Company <strong>and</strong> the other venturer have agreed to share the distributablec<strong>as</strong>h flow from the JCO after paying all taxes in the ratio <strong>of</strong> 60:40 respectively. In addition to the above, theCompany is required to pay a fixed sum for grant <strong>of</strong> license to use the factory premises <strong>of</strong> the other venturerfor the purposes <strong>of</strong> the operations <strong>as</strong> follows:In year 1 – Rs. 0.30 Million per monthIn year 2 – Rs. 0.32 Million per monthIn year 3 – Rs. 0.33 Million per monthAccordingly, 40% share <strong>of</strong> loss from the operations for the period ended March 31, 2010 <strong>of</strong> Rs. 0.56 Millionh<strong>as</strong> been transferred to the joint venture partner <strong>and</strong> disclosed <strong>as</strong> Other Income in Annexure XVII: SummaryStatement <strong>of</strong> Other Income, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>.5. During the year ended March 31, 2010 pursuant to the resolution p<strong>as</strong>sed by the shareholders at theExtraordinary General Meeting held on March 18, 2010, the Company h<strong>as</strong> sub-divided each share <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100each into 10 shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10/- each.Further, the Company during the year ended March 31, 2010 h<strong>as</strong> issued 36,767,760 Equity shares <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10/-each <strong>as</strong> bonus shares at the rate <strong>of</strong> 6 shares for each share held at March 18, 2010 aggregating to Rs. 367.68million by way <strong>of</strong> capitalisation <strong>of</strong> Securities premium account <strong>and</strong> balance in Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account.F-66


6. Managerial Remuneration:Particularsa) Salaries <strong>and</strong>Allowanceb) Contribution toProvident <strong>and</strong> otherfunds(Rs. in Millions)For the year ended March 31,20102009 2008 2007 200610.38 9.20 9.20 1.80 1.350.87 0.76 0.72 0.14 0.07c) Commission 5.07 0.36 1.71 4.77 1.85Total 16.32 10.32 11.63 6.71 3.27Computation <strong>of</strong> net pr<strong>of</strong>it in accordance with section 198 read with section 309 <strong>of</strong> theCompanies Act, 1956:ParticularsFor the year endedMarch 31, 2010(Rs. in Millions)Pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax 308.01Add:Managerial remuneration (Including Commission) 16.32Fixed Assets Written Off 0.02Loss on sale <strong>of</strong> Fixed Assets(Net) 0.13Provision for diminution in value <strong>of</strong> Long TermInvestments (non trade) 0.38 16.85324.86Less: Provision for doubtful debts <strong>and</strong> advances written back 0.52 0.52Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it for the year 324.34Commission to the Whole time Director (As per shareholder agreements) 5.07Note: Figures for earlier years are not given since the status <strong>of</strong> the Company h<strong>as</strong> changed to publiclimited Company during the year ended March 31, 2010. (Refer Note no B (17) below).F-67


7.i) Sales Turnover(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsFor the year ended March 31,BuiltBodies sold20102009 2008 2007 2006In Nos 8,201 8,730 8,933 6,030 8,635Value (A) 2,234.45 1,707.09 1,984.85 1,658.13 759.15Others Value(B) 175.18 1.18 2.37 5.86 40.67Total(A+B)2,409.63 1,708.27 1,987.22 1,663.99 799.82ii) Raw Material ConsumedParticularsIron & SteelHydraulic JackOther Raw Material(Including Stores<strong>and</strong> Spares)TotalValue Qty Value Qty Value Qty Valuein Rs.Millionsin M.T.in Rs.Millionsin No'sin Rs.Millionsin No'sin Rs.Millions2010 734.94 17,513.22 227.27 4,118 311.88-1,274.09For theyearendedMarch31,2009 571.20 12,971 167.91 5,189 250.762008 507.29 15,977 210.36 7,351 217.682007 430.44 13,691 133.76-196.49---989.87935.33760.692006 259.47 9,729 28.58-97.95-386.00Notes:1) Consumption <strong>of</strong> Hydraulic Jack in numbers for the year ended March 31, 2007 <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2006 is not available.2) Quantity for the other raw material (including stores <strong>and</strong> spares) is not given due to various different types <strong>of</strong> rawmaterial consumed.F-68


iii) InventoryParticulars March 31, 2010 March 31, 2009Cl<strong>as</strong>s <strong>of</strong> GoodsQuantityIn No’sValue(Rs. in Millions)QuantityIn No’sValue(Rs. in Millions)a) Finished GoodsOpening Stock - - 1 0.48Closing Stock - - - -Note:There is no inventory <strong>of</strong> finished goods for the year ended March 31, 2008, March 31, 2007 <strong>and</strong> March 31,2006.8. Expenditure in Foreign Currency(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsFor the year ended March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006Foreign Travelling 0.43 1.20 0.63 - -Total 0.43 1.20 0.63 - -9. Earnings in Foreign ExchangeParticulars For the year ended March 31FOB Value <strong>of</strong>Exports10. CIF Value <strong>of</strong> Imported MaterialParticulars2010 2009 2008 2007 2006- 3.29 0.33 - -For the year ended March 31(Rs. in Millions)(Rs. in Millions)2010 2009 2008 2007 2006Raw material 2.86 21.07 10.30 6.16 -Capital goods 70.77 34.65 - - -Total 73.63 55.72 10.30 6.16 -11. As per the information available with the company, the following are the details <strong>of</strong> dues to the creditorswho have confirmed their registration under the Micro, Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Enterprises Development Act,2006. (MSMED Act):(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsAs at March 312010 2009 2008 2007 2006F-69


a) Principal amount remainingunpaid 1.54 4.47 2.65 - -b) <strong>Interest</strong> due thereon 1.25 0.88 0.41 - -c) <strong>Interest</strong> paid by the Companyin terms <strong>of</strong> section 16 <strong>of</strong> Micro,Small <strong>and</strong> Medium EnterprisesDevelopment Act, 2006, - - - - -d) <strong>Interest</strong> due <strong>and</strong> payable forthe period <strong>of</strong> delay in makingpayment 0.36 0.48 0.41 - -e) <strong>Interest</strong> accrued <strong>and</strong> remainingunpaid 1.25 0.88 0.41 - -f) Amount <strong>of</strong> interest due <strong>and</strong>payable on previous year'soutst<strong>and</strong>ing amount 0.88 0.41 - - -12.(a) Contributions are made to Provident Funds which covers all regular employees. Amount recognized <strong>as</strong>expense in respect <strong>of</strong> these defined contribution plans, aggregate to:(Rs. in Millions)For the year ended March 31,2010 2009 2008 2007 20064.48 3.47 3.79 2.33 7.05Provision is made for gratuity b<strong>as</strong>ed upon actuarial valuation done at the end <strong>of</strong> every financial year using‘Projected Unit Credit’ method <strong>and</strong> it covers all regular employees. Gains <strong>and</strong> losses on changes inactuarial <strong>as</strong>sumptions are accounted for in the Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss account.(b) The disclosure <strong>as</strong> required under AS 15 (Revised) regarding Company’s gratuity plan is <strong>as</strong> follows:Amount recognized in Balance sheet(Rs in Millions)ParticularsAs at March31, 2010As at March31, 2009As at March31, 2008As at March31, 2007Present Value <strong>of</strong> Funded Obligations 9.64 8.55 5.99 4.48Fair Value <strong>of</strong> Plan Assets (8.96) (6.14) (5.39) (3.57)Net Liability 0.68 2.41 0.60 0.91Amounts in the Balance SheetLiabilities 0.68 2.41 0.60 0.91Assets - - - -Net Liability/(Asset) 0.68 2.41 0.60 0.91Expense recognized in Statement <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account(Rs in Millions)F-70


ParticularsFor the year ended March 31,2010 2009 2008 2007Current Service Cost 1.09 0.71 0.52 -<strong>Interest</strong> on Defined Benefit Obligation0.71 0.52 0.38 -Expected Return on Plan Assets (0.50) (0.42) (0.32) -Net Actuarial Losses / (Gains) Recognizedin year (0.72) 1.58 0.93 -Total, included in “Employee BenefitExpense” 0.58 2.39 1.51 -Reconciliation <strong>of</strong> Benefit Obligations <strong>and</strong> Plan Assets for the year(Rs. in Millions)ParticularsChange in Defined Benefit ObligationFor the year ended March 31,2010 2009 2008 2007Opening Defined Benefit Obligation 8.55 5.98 4.48 -Current Service Cost<strong>Interest</strong> CostActuarial Losses / (Gain)Benefits paidClosing Defined Benefit Obligation1.09 0.71 0.52 -0.71 0.52 0.38 -(0.56) 1.73 0.94 -(0.15) (0.39) (0.34) -9.64 8.55 5.98 4.48Change in the Fair Value <strong>of</strong> AssetsOpening Fair Value <strong>of</strong> Plan Assets 6.14 5.39 3.57 -Expected Return on Plan AssetActuarial Gain / (Losses)Contributions by EmployerBenefits paidClosing Fair Value <strong>of</strong> Plan Assets(c) Assumptions:0.50 0.42 0.32 -0.16 0.14 0.01 -2.31 0.58 1.83 -(0.15) (0.39) (0.34) -8.96 6.14 5.39 3.57Particulars2010For the year ended March 31,2009 2008 2007F-71


Discount Rate (p.a.) 8.30 % 7.60% 8.00% 8.00%Expected Rate <strong>of</strong> Return onAssets (p.a.)7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50%Salary Escalation Rate (p.a.) 7.00% 7.00% 6.00% 6.00%d) Experience Adjustments:ParticularsFor the year ended March 31,(Rs. in Millions)2010 2009 2008 2007Defined benefit/obligation 9.64 8.55 5.99 4.48Plan Assets 8.97 6.14 5.39 3.57Surplus/Deficit (0.68) (2.41) (0.60) (0.91)Experience Adjustment on0.28 0.39 0.94 -Plan LiabilitiesExperience Adjustment onPlan Assets0.17 0.14 0.01 -13. The principal business <strong>of</strong> the Company is sheet metal fabrication <strong>and</strong> bodybuilding. All other activities <strong>of</strong>the Company revolve around its main business. Hence, there is only one reportable business segment<strong>as</strong> defined by Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ard 17 – “Segment Reporting” (AS 17).14. Provision for Current Income-tax h<strong>as</strong> been made <strong>as</strong> per the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961. Thetax effect <strong>of</strong> significant timing differences that h<strong>as</strong> resulted in deferred tax <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>and</strong> liabilities are givenbelow:(Rs. in Millions)Particularsa) Deferred tax <strong>as</strong>set:As at March 31,2010 2009 2008 2007 2006Gratuity, LeaveEnc<strong>as</strong>hment etc.0.70 1.47 0.84 1.29 1.57Doubtful Debts 0.52 0.75 0.88 - -Other Timing Differences 1.08 0.79 0.02 0.33 -Total Deferred tax <strong>as</strong>setb)Deferred tax liability:2.30 3.01 1.74 1.62 1.57Depreciation 8.27 3.20 0.43 0.22 0.21Other Timing Differences- - - 0.82 0.78F-72


Total Deferred taxliabilityDeferredtax(Liabilities)/ Assets (net)8.27 3.20 0.43 1.04 0.99(5.97) (0.19) 1.31 0.58 0.5815. Foreign Currency BalancesThe year-end foreign currency exposures that have not been specifically hedged by a derivativeinstrument or otherwise are given below:Amounts payable in foreign currency on account <strong>of</strong> the following:ParticularsRs. inMillionsCreditorsIn ForeignCurrencyAdvances For MaterialsRs. inMillionsIn ForeignCurrencyFor theyear endedMarch 31,2010- - - -2009 36.97 735,000 USD - -2008- - 0.3 7,480 USD2007- - 0.29 6,660 USD2006- - - -Exchange Gain/ (Loss) (net) accounted during the period:(Rs. In Millions)For the year ended March 31,Particulars 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006On Sales - **(0.00) ***(0.00) - -On Material Purch<strong>as</strong>e *0.00 (2.86) 0.17 0.04 -On purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Machinery 7.13 - - - -* Rs.5,000** Rs. 2,000***Rs. 7,00016. During the year ended March 31, 2010, the Company h<strong>as</strong> paid pr<strong>of</strong>essional <strong>and</strong> statutory chargesaggregating to Rs 10.55 Million on account <strong>of</strong> services received for the proposed initial public <strong>of</strong>fering(IPO) <strong>of</strong> the Company. The same is being carried forward under Annexure XI: Summary Statement <strong>of</strong>Loans <strong>and</strong> Advances, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> to be adjusted against securities premium on completion <strong>of</strong> the said IPO.17. Effective March 18, 2010 the Company's status h<strong>as</strong> changed to a Public Limited Company, consequent towhich, the name <strong>of</strong> the Company h<strong>as</strong> been changed to “Commercial Engineers & Body Builders CoF-73


Limited”. The revised certificate <strong>of</strong> incorporation h<strong>as</strong> been received by the Company from the Registrar<strong>of</strong> Companies.18. Figures <strong>of</strong> previous years are regrouped wherever are necessary to correspond with the figures <strong>of</strong> the yearended / <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2010.F-74


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OFOPERATIONSYou should read the following discussion <strong>and</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> our financial condition <strong>and</strong> results <strong>of</strong> operations togetherwith our financial statements included in this Prospectus. You should also read the section “Risk Factors”beginning on page XIII <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus, which discusses a number <strong>of</strong> factors <strong>and</strong> contingencies that could impactour financial condition <strong>and</strong> results <strong>of</strong> operations. The following discussion <strong>and</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> our financial condition<strong>and</strong> results <strong>of</strong> operations is b<strong>as</strong>ed on our re<strong>stated</strong> st<strong>and</strong>alone financial statements <strong>as</strong> at <strong>and</strong> for the fiscal yearsended March 31, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 <strong>and</strong> 2010. Our fiscal year ends on March 31 <strong>of</strong> each year, therefore allreferences to a particular fiscal year are to the twelve-month period ended March 31 <strong>of</strong> that year.Unless otherwise indicated, references in this discussion <strong>and</strong> analysis to our results <strong>of</strong> operations or financialcondition for a specified year are to our financial year ended March 31 <strong>of</strong> such year. In this section, any referenceto “we”, “us”, “our”, unless the context otherwise implies, refers to our Company.Overview <strong>of</strong> BusinessWe produce vehicle <strong>and</strong> locomotive bodies for diverse applications for road <strong>and</strong> railways transportation. We are one<strong>of</strong> the leading designers <strong>and</strong> manufacturers in India <strong>of</strong> vehicle bodies in the commercial vehicles division with anextensive portfolio <strong>of</strong> product <strong>of</strong>ferings. We conduct refurbishment <strong>of</strong> wagons <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> manufacturing componentsfor wagons, coaches <strong>and</strong> locomotives in the railways division.Our Promoter, Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, h<strong>as</strong> been with our Company since 1979 <strong>and</strong> h<strong>as</strong> over 30 years <strong>of</strong> experience invehicle body building in the commercial vehicles industry. He w<strong>as</strong> the President <strong>of</strong> the Federation <strong>of</strong> AutomobileDealers Association (FADA) from September 2000 to September 2002 <strong>and</strong> is currently an active member <strong>of</strong> itsGoverning Council. Our Other Promoter, Mr. Ajay Gupta, h<strong>as</strong> been instrumental in conceiving <strong>and</strong> extending ourbusiness in the railways industry.Primarily, our business comprises <strong>of</strong> manufacturing vehicle bodies for commercial vehicles, refurbishment <strong>of</strong>wagons <strong>and</strong> manufacture <strong>of</strong> locomotive <strong>and</strong> wagon components.Commercial Vehicles DivisionWe are engaged in the business <strong>of</strong> manufacturing vehicle bodies in the commercial vehicles division for OriginalEquipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) engaged in the production <strong>of</strong> Fully Built Vehicles (“FBVs”).We believe that we have forged long-st<strong>and</strong>ing relationships with OEMs such <strong>as</strong> Tata Motors Limited <strong>and</strong> theMinistry <strong>of</strong> Defense <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> with corporate groups who have significant private fleets <strong>of</strong> vehicles such <strong>as</strong> ReliancePetroleum Limited, Reliance Industries Limited <strong>and</strong> Som Datt Builders Private Limited. Our supplies to Tata MotorsLimited are both for their Indian <strong>and</strong> export markets. We have also received orders for manufacturing differentvehicle bodies in the commercial vehicles division from OEMs such <strong>as</strong> VE Commercial Vehicles Limited (a jointventure between the Volvo group <strong>and</strong> Eicher Motors Limited), Ashok Leyl<strong>and</strong> Limited, Asia MotorWorks Limited,Man Force Trucks Private Limited <strong>and</strong> Hino Motors Sales India Private Limited (belonging to the Toyota group <strong>of</strong>companies), all <strong>of</strong> which also manufacture FBVs.In FY10, the cumulative production <strong>of</strong> goods carriers in the medium <strong>and</strong> heavy commercial vehicles categoryproduced by our key customers, Ashok Leyl<strong>and</strong> Limited, Asia MotorWorks Limited, Tata Motors Limited <strong>and</strong> theEicher group w<strong>as</strong> approximately 97.5% <strong>of</strong> the total production among the manufacturers <strong>of</strong> goods carriers in thiscategory (Source: SIAM).We have a wide range <strong>of</strong> product <strong>of</strong>ferings in the commercial vehicles division. Vehicle bodies designed <strong>and</strong>manufactured by us cater to a variety <strong>of</strong> requirements in different industries <strong>and</strong> sectors. For the Fiscal Year 2010<strong>and</strong> Fiscal Year 2009, our net sales from the commercial vehicles division were Rs. 1,211.68 million <strong>and</strong> Rs.1,093.69 million, respectively.Railways Division156


In late 2008, we exp<strong>and</strong>ed our business into the railways division <strong>and</strong> have received various orders from the IndianRailways through a number <strong>of</strong> its production units, zonal authorities <strong>and</strong> workshops, including Diesel LocomotiveWorks (“DLW”), Western Railway, E<strong>as</strong>tern Railway, Wagon Repair Shop, Kota (a workshop <strong>of</strong> the West CentralRailway) <strong>and</strong> the Northern Railway Carriage & Wagon Workshop at Jagadhari, Haryana. Work under the ordersplaced on us includes the refurbishment <strong>and</strong> manufacture <strong>of</strong> Side-Walls <strong>and</strong> End-Walls for railway wagons <strong>and</strong> themanufacture <strong>of</strong> long hood structures for locomotives.We have received approval from the RDSO (a unit <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Railways in charge <strong>of</strong> maintaining st<strong>and</strong>ardsfor Rolling Stock <strong>and</strong> approving vendors to the Indian Railways) for our Quality Assurance Plan (“QAP”) for thefabrication <strong>of</strong> side walls, end walls <strong>and</strong> flap doors <strong>of</strong> BOXNR Wagons. This approval is a pre-requisite in order forcompanies to be eligible to supply side walls <strong>and</strong> end walls for BOXNR Wagons under the BOXNR Guidelines.Our welders have been certified under IS 7310 Part-I <strong>of</strong> the Welder Qualification & Welding ProcedureQualification.Further, our manufacturing facilities have been certified by the Integral Coach Factory (“ICF”), a production unit <strong>of</strong>the Indian Railways, to be adequate for the supply <strong>of</strong> side walls, ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>as</strong>semblies <strong>and</strong> car line pillars for LHBCoaches. We have also been included in the approved vendor list <strong>of</strong> ICF for the supply <strong>of</strong> LHB Design side walls,ro<strong>of</strong> & stainless steel shell construction. We recently bid for a tender from the ICF for the supply <strong>and</strong> installation <strong>of</strong>cattle guards for EMUs, which h<strong>as</strong> been accepted on development b<strong>as</strong>is.We also intend to set up a new factory near Jabalpur in Madhya Pradesh with facilities for the manufacture <strong>of</strong>railway wagons <strong>and</strong> EMU Coaches (“Railway Project”). The Project will be implemented in 2 ph<strong>as</strong>es <strong>and</strong> the totalcost <strong>of</strong> the Project is approximately Rs. 1,303.06 million, out <strong>of</strong> which Rs. 500.00 million will be funded through aloan from Axis Bank <strong>and</strong> the remainder will be financed from internal accruals <strong>and</strong> Net Proceeds <strong>of</strong> the Fresh Issue.The factory would have a manufacturing capacity <strong>of</strong> 1,200 wagons <strong>and</strong> 150 EMU Coaches <strong>and</strong> the first ph<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> theProject is expected to commence commercial production in December 2010. For further details, refer to the section"Objects <strong>of</strong> the Issue" beginning at page 40 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.We have recently bid in the railway tender for the manufacture, fabrication <strong>and</strong> supply <strong>of</strong> 10,739 new wagons. ForFiscal Year 2010 <strong>and</strong> Fiscal Year 2009, our net sales from the railways division were Rs. 502.78 million <strong>and</strong> Rs.26.77 million, respectively.Our Total Income h<strong>as</strong> incre<strong>as</strong>ed from Rs. 522.96 million in fiscal year 2006 to Rs. 1,968.71 million in fiscal year2010, representing a CAGR <strong>of</strong> 39.29%. Our net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> h<strong>as</strong> incre<strong>as</strong>ed from Rs. 25.04 million infiscal year 2006 to Rs. 191.97 million in fiscal year 2010, representing a CAGR <strong>of</strong> 66.40%.Steel Fabrication Job WorkWe have in the p<strong>as</strong>t, executed steel fabrication job works on an ad hoc b<strong>as</strong>is from time to time which h<strong>as</strong>occ<strong>as</strong>ionally contributed significantly to our bottomline. However, such work is not part <strong>of</strong> our regular businessactivities <strong>and</strong> therefore we may not continue this work in the future. For Fiscal Year 2010, our net sales from thesteel fabrication job work w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 114.18 million, while we reported no sales in the Fiscal Year 2009 from thisparticular business activity.As <strong>of</strong> July 15, 2010, our Order Book in the commercial vehicles division w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 5,255.39 million <strong>and</strong> in therailways division w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 981.55 million.Factors Affecting our Result <strong>of</strong> OperationsOur results <strong>of</strong> operations have been, <strong>and</strong> will continue to be, influenced by a number <strong>of</strong> factors, some <strong>of</strong> which arebeyond our control. This section discusses certain specific items which have impacted our results <strong>of</strong> operations inthe fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 <strong>and</strong> 2010.General economic <strong>and</strong> business conditionsAny change in the prevailing conditions in the economy that impacts the overall development <strong>and</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> theIndian economy is likely to affect our business.Regulations <strong>and</strong> policies affecting the transportation <strong>and</strong> logistic sector in India157


The Government <strong>of</strong> India h<strong>as</strong> recently implemented various policies designed to promote the sales <strong>of</strong> CVs in India.Similarly, the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Railways h<strong>as</strong> initiated various schemes which are likely to benefit us. Any change in suchschemes or withdrawal <strong>of</strong> such schemes is likely to affect our growth.Customer ConcentrationHistorically, we have depended significantly on revenues from a limited number <strong>of</strong> customers, <strong>and</strong> may continue todo so in the future. In the fiscal years 2007, 2008, 2009 <strong>and</strong> 2010, we derived 86.36%, 73.91%, 69.23% <strong>and</strong> 52.46%respectively, <strong>of</strong> our net sales from Tata Motors Limited. In the fiscal year 2009 <strong>and</strong> in the fiscal year 2010, wederived 2.39% <strong>and</strong> 27.49% <strong>of</strong> our Company’s net sales from the railways division, all <strong>of</strong> which w<strong>as</strong> accounted forby the Indian Railways.Financial health <strong>of</strong> the Indian RailwaysIn the event the Indian Railways decides to reduce the number <strong>of</strong> wagons to be refurbished or changes the budgetedfunding allocation towards wagon refurbishment, our business <strong>and</strong> financial conditions may be impacted.Our ability to tie up our major raw material requirementsOur business is affected by the availability, cost <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> the raw materials <strong>and</strong> other inputs used by us formanufacturing our products, like steel. In addition, hydraulic jacks are a necessary component for certain vehiclebodies manufactured by us. Any failure to procure these raw material inputs may adversely affect our business.Our customers place orders with us on a purch<strong>as</strong>e order b<strong>as</strong>is rather than through long – term contractsTherefore there can be no <strong>as</strong>surance that we will continue to receive orders from any <strong>of</strong> our customers or our orderbook may get altered, delayed, scaled down, cancelled or not fully paid for by our customers.The availability <strong>of</strong> finance on favourable terms for our business <strong>and</strong> for our customersAny change in interest rates <strong>and</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> finance may affect the dem<strong>and</strong> for CVs or refurbishment <strong>of</strong> railwaywagons <strong>as</strong> this may incre<strong>as</strong>e the costs for our customers.CompetitionWe may also face competition from large Indian <strong>and</strong> international companies who might consider setting upfacilities to manufacture bodies for CVs <strong>and</strong> railway components in India, with whom we might not be able tocompete <strong>as</strong> successfully.Se<strong>as</strong>onality <strong>of</strong> BusinessOur business in the commercial vehicles division is se<strong>as</strong>onal in nature such that typically a substantial part <strong>of</strong> salesare realized during the second half <strong>of</strong> the financial year. A review <strong>of</strong> the sales figures <strong>of</strong> the Company from FY 2006through to FY 2010 shows this. For FY 2006, the split w<strong>as</strong> 26.30% versus 73.70%; FY 2007 recorded 29.14%versus 70.86%; FY 2008 the split w<strong>as</strong> 40.98% versus 59.02%; FY 2009 the split w<strong>as</strong> 59.41% versus 40.59%; <strong>and</strong>FY 2010 the split w<strong>as</strong> 30.10% versus 69.90%. This trend is largely due to incre<strong>as</strong>ed sales in the second half <strong>of</strong> thefinancial year on account <strong>of</strong> activity being slow <strong>and</strong> hence dem<strong>and</strong> being low during the monsoon from the mining<strong>and</strong> road-construction sectors for which a major part <strong>of</strong> our vehicle bodies in the commercial vehicles division areintended..Further, the commercial vehicles industry is inherently cyclical in nature <strong>and</strong> downswings in this industry can havean adverse effect on our performance.With regards to se<strong>as</strong>onality in the railways business, on an annual b<strong>as</strong>is the Railway Budget is presented in February<strong>and</strong> then incorporated into a bill in a few months. Subsequent to this, the tenders are sent out for various works bythe different railway boards <strong>and</strong> zones. However, the time it takes for the various railway zones to send out tenderscan vary substantially. Accordingly, dem<strong>and</strong> in the railways division tends to be low in the first quarter <strong>of</strong> thefinancial year <strong>and</strong> picks up only in the second quarter in response to the Railway Budget announcement in the l<strong>as</strong>tquarter <strong>of</strong> the previous financial year.Therefore, six-monthly or quarterly comparisons <strong>of</strong> our sales <strong>and</strong> operating results should not be relied upon <strong>as</strong>indicators <strong>of</strong> our performance.Significant developments after March 31, 2010 that may affect our future results <strong>of</strong> operations158


<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> in this Prospectus, to our knowledge, <strong>and</strong> in the opinion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Directors</strong>, no circumstances havearisen since the date <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>as</strong>t financial statements <strong>as</strong> disclosed in this Prospectus which materially <strong>and</strong> adverselyaffects or is likely to affect, our operations or pr<strong>of</strong>itability on a b<strong>as</strong>is, or the value <strong>of</strong> our <strong>as</strong>sets or our ability to payour material liabilities within the next twelve months.<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> above <strong>and</strong> elsewhere in this Prospectus, there is no subsequent development after the date <strong>of</strong> theAuditor’s Report which we believe is expected to have a material impact on our reserves, pr<strong>of</strong>its, EPS <strong>and</strong> bookvalue.A. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES :(a) B<strong>as</strong>is for preparation <strong>of</strong> accounts:The accompanying financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles in India <strong>and</strong> the Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards notifiedunder the Companies (Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards) Rules, 2006.(b)Use <strong>of</strong> Estimates:The preparation <strong>of</strong> financial statements, in conformity with the generally accepted accounting principles,requires estimates <strong>and</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumptions to be made that affect the reported amounts <strong>of</strong> <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>and</strong> liabilities onthe date <strong>of</strong> financial statements <strong>and</strong> the reported amounts <strong>of</strong> revenues <strong>and</strong> expenses during the reportedperiod. Differences between the actual results <strong>and</strong> estimates are recognized in the period in which theresults are known/materialized.(c)Fixed Assets:Fixed <strong>as</strong>sets are <strong>stated</strong> at cost net <strong>of</strong> Cenvat. Costs includes all cost incurred to bring the <strong>as</strong>sets to theirworking condition <strong>and</strong> location.The company capitalizes s<strong>of</strong>tware <strong>and</strong> related implementation costs, where it is re<strong>as</strong>onably estimated thatthe s<strong>of</strong>tware h<strong>as</strong> an enduring useful life.(d)Depreciation <strong>and</strong> amortization:i) Depreciation is provided using the written-down method b<strong>as</strong>ed on estimated useful life <strong>of</strong> the <strong>as</strong>sets. Thedepreciation rates, b<strong>as</strong>ed on management’ estimates, used are <strong>as</strong> follows:Block <strong>of</strong> AssetsDepreciation rateFactory Building 10%Non-Factory Building 10%Residential Flat 5%Plant <strong>and</strong> Machinery 15% - 100%Office Equipments 15%Computers 60%Vehicles 25.89%Electrical Installations 20%Furniture <strong>and</strong> Fixtures 18.10%ii)Le<strong>as</strong>ehold l<strong>and</strong> is amortized over the period <strong>of</strong> le<strong>as</strong>e on pro rata b<strong>as</strong>is.iii) Depreciation on <strong>as</strong>sets acquired/purch<strong>as</strong>ed during the year is provided on pro-rata b<strong>as</strong>is fromthe date <strong>of</strong> each addition.iv)Assets having value <strong>of</strong> Rs.5,000/- or less are charged <strong>of</strong>f fully in the year <strong>of</strong> purch<strong>as</strong>e.159


v) Computer S<strong>of</strong>tware is amortized over the period <strong>of</strong> three years.(e)Impairment <strong>of</strong> Assets:At the end <strong>of</strong> each period, the company determines whether a provision should be made for impairmentloss on fixed <strong>as</strong>sets by considering the indications that an impairment loss may have occurred inaccordance with Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ard 28 on ‘‘Impairment <strong>of</strong> Assets’’. Where the recoverable amount <strong>of</strong>any fixed <strong>as</strong>set is lower than its carrying amount, a provision for impairment loss on fixed <strong>as</strong>sets is madefor the difference.(f)Revenue recognition:Revenue from sale <strong>of</strong> built bodies is recognised when products are despatched <strong>and</strong> all significant risks <strong>and</strong>rewards <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> the products are transferred to the customers.Revenue from service contracts is recognised when the services are completed.(g)Inventories:Inventories are valued at lower <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>and</strong> net realisable value. The cost <strong>of</strong> inventories is arrived at on thefollowing b<strong>as</strong>is:Raw materials : On FIFO b<strong>as</strong>is (net <strong>of</strong> Cenvat)Work-in-progressFinished goodsStores <strong>and</strong> spares: On weighted average b<strong>as</strong>is including direct factory overheads: On weighted average b<strong>as</strong>is, attributable overheads <strong>and</strong> Excise duty: On FIFO b<strong>as</strong>is(h)Foreign currency transactions:(i)Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the exchange rates prevailing on the date <strong>of</strong> transaction.Monetary items are translated at the period-end rates. The exchange difference between the rate prevailingon the date <strong>of</strong> transaction <strong>and</strong> on the date <strong>of</strong> settlement <strong>as</strong> also on translation <strong>of</strong> monetary items at the end<strong>of</strong> the period is recognized <strong>as</strong> income or expense, <strong>as</strong> the c<strong>as</strong>e may be.Employee Benefits:(a) Post Employment Benefits <strong>and</strong> Other Long Term Benefits:i) Contributions under Defined Contribution Plans in the form <strong>of</strong> Provident Fund are recognized inthe Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account in the period in which the employee h<strong>as</strong> rendered the service.ii) Defined Benefit <strong>and</strong> Other Long term Benefit Plans :The Company’s Liability towards Defined Benefit Plan in the form <strong>of</strong> Gratuity is funded throughscheme administered by the Life Insurance Corporation <strong>of</strong> India (LIC) <strong>and</strong> administered throughrespective Trusts set-up by the Company. The liability is determined on the b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> actuarialvaluation being carried out at each Balance Sheet date using the Projected Unit Credit Method.The liability for the Interim financial statements is calculated by management on the b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong>latest actuarial valuations. The retirement benefit obligation recognized in the Balance Sheetrepresents the total <strong>of</strong> present value <strong>of</strong> the defined benefit obligation <strong>as</strong> reduced by unrecognizedp<strong>as</strong>t service cost <strong>and</strong> the fair value <strong>of</strong> plan <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>as</strong> at the balance sheet date. Any <strong>as</strong>sets resulting160


from this calculation is restricted to the present value <strong>of</strong> available refunds from the plan orreductions in future contributions to the plan.Actuarial gains <strong>and</strong> losses are recognized immediately in the Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Account in theperiod <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> such gains <strong>and</strong> losses. P<strong>as</strong>t service cost is recognized <strong>as</strong> an expense on <strong>as</strong>traight-line b<strong>as</strong>is over the average period until the benefits become vested to the extent that thebenefits are already vested immediately following the introduction <strong>of</strong> , or changes to, a definedbenefit plan, p<strong>as</strong>t service cost is recognized immediately.(b)Short Term Employee Benefits:Short-term employee benefits are recognized <strong>as</strong> expenses at the undiscounted amount in the Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong>Loss Account <strong>of</strong> the period in which the related services are rendered.(j)Leave enc<strong>as</strong>hment is provided for on the b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> actual costs the Company expects to pay for thecompensated absences.Borrowing costs:Borrowing costs that are attributable to the acquisition or construction <strong>of</strong> qualifying <strong>as</strong>sets are capitalized <strong>as</strong>part <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> such <strong>as</strong>sets. A qualifying <strong>as</strong>set is one that necessarily takes a substantial period <strong>of</strong> time toget ready for its intended use or sale. All other borrowing costs are charged to revenue.(k)Income taxes:Tax expense comprises <strong>of</strong> current tax, deferred tax <strong>and</strong> fringe benefit tax. Current tax is me<strong>as</strong>ured at theamount expected to be paid to/ recovered from the tax authorities, using the applicable tax rates.Deferred income tax reflect the current period timing differences between taxable income <strong>and</strong> accountingincome for the period <strong>and</strong> reversal <strong>of</strong> timing differences <strong>of</strong> earlier years/period. Deferred tax <strong>as</strong>sets arerecognized only to the extent that there is re<strong>as</strong>onable certainty that sufficient future income will beavailable except that deferred tax <strong>as</strong>sets, in c<strong>as</strong>e there are unabsorbed depreciation <strong>and</strong> losses, arerecognized if there is virtual certainty that sufficient future taxable income will be available to realize thesame.Fringe benefits tax is recognized in accordance with the relevant provisions <strong>of</strong> the Income- tax Act, 1961<strong>and</strong> the Guidance Note on Fringe Benefits Tax issued by the Institute <strong>of</strong> Chartered Accountants <strong>of</strong> India.(l)(m)(n)Investments:Investments cl<strong>as</strong>sified <strong>as</strong> long-term investments are <strong>stated</strong> at costs. Provision is made to recognize adiminution, other than temporary, in the value <strong>of</strong> such investments. Investments cl<strong>as</strong>sified <strong>as</strong> currentinvestments are <strong>stated</strong> at lower <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>and</strong> fair value.Operating Le<strong>as</strong>esAssets taken on Le<strong>as</strong>e under which all significant risks <strong>and</strong> rewards <strong>of</strong> ownership are effectively retainedby the lesser are cl<strong>as</strong>sified <strong>as</strong> Operating Le<strong>as</strong>es. Le<strong>as</strong>e payments under Operating Le<strong>as</strong>es are recognized <strong>as</strong>expenses <strong>as</strong> incurred in accordance with the respective Le<strong>as</strong>e Agreements.Contingent Liabilities:These, if any, are disclosed in the notes <strong>and</strong> accounts. Provision is made in the accounts if it becomesprobable that any outflow <strong>of</strong> resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle theobligation.161


Results <strong>of</strong> OperationsThe following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from our re<strong>stated</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> loss statements, ineach c<strong>as</strong>e also <strong>stated</strong> <strong>as</strong> a percentage <strong>of</strong> total income:(Rs. in millions)PARTICULARSFOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,INCOME2010 % 2009 % 2008 % 2007 % 2006 %Sales <strong>and</strong> Income fromOperations 2,409.63 1,708.27 1,987.22 1,663.99 799.82Less : Excise dutyNet Sales580.99 587.81 795.14 707.65 298.311,828.64 92.89% 1,120.46 88.82% 1,192.08 94.27% 956.34 92.49% 501.51 95.90%Other Income47.88 2.43% 47.76 3.79% 57.67 4.56% 26.49 2.56% 16.56 3.17%Incre<strong>as</strong>e in Inventory <strong>of</strong>finished products, workin progress <strong>and</strong> scrap 92.19 4.68% 93.30 7.40% 14.74 1.17% 51.14 4.95% 4.89 0.94%Total Income1,968.71 100.00% 1,261.52 100.00% 1,264.49 100.00% 1,033.97 100.00% 522.96 100.00%EXPENDITUREManufacturing expenses1,390.06 70.61% 1,049.60 83.20% 997.08 78.85% 821.09 79.41% 425.24 81.31%Employee Remuneration<strong>and</strong> Benefits 73.85 3.75% 55.35 4.39% 44.66 3.53% 31.36 3.03% 28.78 5.50%Other Expenses92.08 4.68% 62.6 4.96% 62.29 4.93% 37.96 3.67% 24.33 4.65%<strong>Interest</strong>68.32 3.47% 53.79 4.26% 45.12 3.57% 25.06 2.42% 9.69 1.85%Depreciation /Amortization 36.39 1.85% 16.74 1.33% 9.16 0.72% 7.49 0.72% 2.88 0.55%Total Expenditure1,660.70 84.35% 1,238.08 98.14% 1,158.31 91.60% 922.96 89.26% 490.92 93.87%PROFIT BEFORETAX 308.01 15.65% 23.44 1.86% 106.18 8.40% 111.01 10.74% 32.04 6.13%LESS: PROVISIONFOR TAX 105.02 5.33% 9.35 0.74% 40.97 3.24% 39.43 3.81% 10.30 1.97%NET PROFIT AFTERTAX AS PERAUDITEDFINANCIALSTATEMENTS 202.99 10.31% 14.09 1.12% 65.21 5.16% 71.58 6.92% 21.74 4.16%Adjustments made onaccount <strong>of</strong> restatement-11.02 -0.56% 3.33 0.26% -3.82 -0.30% 13.6 1.32% 3.30 0.63%NET (LOSS) / PROFITAFTER TAX, ASRESTATED 191.97 9.75% 17.42 1.38% 61.39 4.85% 85.18 8.24% 25.04 4.79%Description <strong>of</strong> our Pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>and</strong> Loss Statement Line Items:IncomeOur Total Income consists <strong>of</strong> the following items:• Net Sales (Sales <strong>and</strong> Income from Operations Less Excise Duties) ; <strong>and</strong>162


• Other Income; <strong>and</strong>• Incre<strong>as</strong>e in Inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work in progress <strong>and</strong> scrapSales <strong>and</strong> Income from Operations: Our Sales <strong>and</strong> Income from Operations includes income from the sale <strong>of</strong> vehiclebodies in the commercial vehicle division, income from the manufacture <strong>and</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> components for railwaywagons, coaches <strong>and</strong> locomotives, income from the refurbishment <strong>of</strong> railway wagons <strong>and</strong> income from adhoc steelfabrication job works.Net Sales: Our Net Sales consist <strong>of</strong> Sales <strong>and</strong> Income from Operations less the excise duties paid by us to theGovernment.Other Income: Our other income primarily includes interest income from deposits <strong>and</strong> other sources, income fromtransportation, income from the sale <strong>of</strong> scrap, exchange rate fluctuations (net), excess provision for earlier yearswritten back, provision for doubtful debts written back, provident fund refund, pr<strong>of</strong>it on sales <strong>of</strong> fixed <strong>as</strong>sets (net),<strong>and</strong> miscellaneous income less any tax deducted at source on the interest earned.Incre<strong>as</strong>e in Inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work in progress <strong>and</strong> scrap: This pertains to any incre<strong>as</strong>e / decre<strong>as</strong>e inthe inventory pertaining to finished products <strong>and</strong> the materials which are cl<strong>as</strong>sified <strong>as</strong> work in progress <strong>and</strong> scrap.Total Income: Our total income consists <strong>of</strong> Net Sales, Other Income <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Incre<strong>as</strong>e in Inventory <strong>of</strong> finishedproducts, work in progress <strong>and</strong> scrap.ExpenditureOur expenditure consists <strong>of</strong> the following items:• Manufacturing expenses• Employee Remuneration <strong>and</strong> Benefits• Other Expenses• <strong>Interest</strong>• Depreciation / AmortizationManufacturing Expenses: Our Manufacturing expenses include expenses incurred on the raw materials <strong>and</strong> stores /spares consumed <strong>and</strong> other manufacturing expenses like power <strong>and</strong> fuel charges, entry tax, excise duty on change ininventory <strong>of</strong> scrap <strong>and</strong> general repairs <strong>and</strong> maintenance to buildings, plant <strong>and</strong> machinery in the ordinary course <strong>of</strong>business.Employee Remuneration <strong>and</strong> Benefits: Our expenditure on Employee Remuneration <strong>and</strong> Benefits includes salaries,wages <strong>and</strong> bonus, contribution to provident fund <strong>and</strong> other funds <strong>and</strong> staff welfare expenses.Other Expenses: Our Other expenses include insurance, rent, rates <strong>and</strong> taxes, vehicle expenses, travelling <strong>and</strong>conveyance expenses, postage, telegram <strong>and</strong> telephone expenses, printing <strong>and</strong> stationery expenses, expenditure onaccount <strong>of</strong> fixed <strong>as</strong>sets being written <strong>of</strong>f, loss incurred on account <strong>of</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> fixed <strong>as</strong>sets (net), expense incurred onexchange rate fluctuations (net), expenditure on account <strong>of</strong> capital work in progress being written <strong>of</strong>f, freightcharges, provision for doubtful advances, provision for doubtful debts, expenses on account <strong>of</strong> bad debts <strong>and</strong>advances being written <strong>of</strong>f, legal <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional fees, c<strong>as</strong>h discount, selling expenses, <strong>and</strong> miscellaneous expenses.<strong>Interest</strong>: Our <strong>Interest</strong> expenses pertain to the interest <strong>and</strong> financial charges on term loans, working capital loans <strong>and</strong>c<strong>as</strong>h credit facilities, vehicle loans, other loans <strong>and</strong> finance charges.Depreciation / Amortization: Depreciation / Amortization relates primarily to the depreciation charged on our grossfixed <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>and</strong> is calculated by using the written-down method b<strong>as</strong>ed on estimated useful life <strong>of</strong> the <strong>as</strong>sets.TaxationTax expense comprises <strong>of</strong> current tax <strong>and</strong> deferred tax. Current tax is me<strong>as</strong>ured at the amount expected to be paid to/recovered from the tax authorities, using the applicable tax rates. Deferred tax <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>and</strong> liabilities are recognised163


for future tax consequences attributable to timing differences between taxable income <strong>and</strong> accounting income thatare capable <strong>of</strong> reversal in one or more subsequent period <strong>and</strong> are me<strong>as</strong>ured using relevant enacted tax rates. Thecarrying amount <strong>of</strong> deferred tax <strong>as</strong>sets at each Balance sheet date is reduced to the extent that it is no longer virtuallycertain that sufficient future taxable income will be available against which the deferred tax <strong>as</strong>set can be realized.Net Pr<strong>of</strong>itOur Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax <strong>as</strong> per the audited financial statements, before restatement is calculated <strong>as</strong> our Total Incomeless the Total Expenditure <strong>and</strong> provision for tax. Adjustments have been made to the Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax <strong>as</strong> per theaudited financial statements to arrive at the Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>. For further details regarding theadjustments, kindly refer to the Notes to the Re<strong>stated</strong> Summary Statements beginning on Page F-1 <strong>of</strong> thisProspectus.Comparison <strong>of</strong> Performance <strong>and</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong> Developments for the financial year ended March 31, 2010 vis-à-visfinancial year ended March 31, 2009Sales <strong>and</strong> Income from Operations: Our sales <strong>and</strong> income from operations incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 2,409.63 million in fiscal2010 from Rs. 1,708.27 million in fiscal 2009, representing an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 41.06%. This incre<strong>as</strong>e w<strong>as</strong> mainly onaccount <strong>of</strong> higher sales from built bodies for commercial vehicles in-line with the economic recovery <strong>and</strong> thebusiness activity pick-up experienced during the fiscal year. Also, we ramped up our operations in the railwaysdivision in fiscal 2010, which led to a substantial incre<strong>as</strong>e in our sales <strong>and</strong> income from operations for the railwaysdivisionNet Sales: Our net sales incre<strong>as</strong>ed from Rs. 1,120.46 million in fiscal 2009 to Rs. 1,828.64 million in fiscal 2010,representing an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 63.21%. This incre<strong>as</strong>e in our net sales w<strong>as</strong> much higher <strong>as</strong> compared to the incre<strong>as</strong>e inour sales <strong>and</strong> income from operations mainly on account <strong>of</strong> the lower excise duties in line with the fiscal packageannounced by the Central Government. Our net sales <strong>as</strong> a percentage <strong>of</strong> total income, incre<strong>as</strong>ed from 88.82% infiscal 2009 to 92.89% in fiscal 2010, on account <strong>of</strong> a marginal incre<strong>as</strong>e in other income <strong>as</strong> compared to the incre<strong>as</strong>ein sales <strong>and</strong> income from operations. Our net sales in fiscal 2010, for the commercial vehicles division were Rs.1211.68 million <strong>and</strong> for the railways division were Rs. 502.78 million <strong>as</strong> compared to the net sales in fiscal 2009, forthe commercial vehicles division at Rs. 1,093.69 million <strong>and</strong> for the railways division at Rs. 26.77 million.Other Income: Our other income incre<strong>as</strong>ed marginally from Rs. 47.76 million in fiscal 2009 from Rs. 47.88 millionin fiscal 2010, representing an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 0.25%. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, other income dipped to 2.43% infiscal 2010 from 3.79% in fiscal 2009.Incre<strong>as</strong>e in Inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work in progress <strong>and</strong> scrap: Our inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work inprogress <strong>and</strong> scrap incre<strong>as</strong>ed in fiscal 2010 by Rs. 92.19 million <strong>as</strong> against an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Rs. 93.30 million in fiscal2009. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, this accounted for 4.68% in fiscal 2010 <strong>as</strong> against 7.40% in fiscal 2009.Total Income: Our total income incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 1,968.71 million in fiscal 2010 from Rs. 1261.52 million in fiscal2009, representing an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 56.06%. The key re<strong>as</strong>ons for the incre<strong>as</strong>e in total income were higher sales frombuilt bodies for commercial vehicles in-line with the economic recovery <strong>and</strong> the business activity pick-upexperienced during the fiscal year, ramp-up in the Company’s railways division <strong>and</strong> lower excise duties on account<strong>of</strong> the Government’s fiscal package.Manufacturing Expenses: Our manufacturing expenses incre<strong>as</strong>ed by 32.44% to Rs. 1,390.06 million in fiscal 2010from Rs. 1,049.60 million in fiscal 2009. The net consumption <strong>of</strong> raw materials incre<strong>as</strong>ed from Rs. 921.93 million infiscal 2009 to Rs. 1,180.50 million in fiscal 2010, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 28.05%, <strong>and</strong> the net consumption <strong>of</strong> stores / sparesincre<strong>as</strong>ed from Rs. 67.94 million in fiscal 2009 to Rs. 93.59 million in fiscal 2010, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 37.75%, both <strong>of</strong>which were lower than the corresponding incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 56.06% in the total income <strong>of</strong> the company from fiscal 2009 t<strong>of</strong>iscal 2010. On account <strong>of</strong> the above, the manufacturing expenses, <strong>as</strong> a proportion <strong>of</strong> total income reduced from83.20% in fiscal 2009 to 70.61% in fiscal 2010. This decre<strong>as</strong>e occurred mainly on account <strong>of</strong> the lower prices <strong>of</strong> rawmaterials like steel <strong>and</strong> stores / spares experienced during the fiscal year 2010 <strong>as</strong> compared to fiscal 2009.Employee Remuneration <strong>and</strong> Benefits: Our employee remuneration <strong>and</strong> benefits incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 73.85 million infiscal year 2010 from Rs. 55.35 million in fiscal 2009, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 33.42%. This w<strong>as</strong> on account <strong>of</strong> the salary164


increments given to our employees in fiscal 2010 <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> the incre<strong>as</strong>e in the headcount <strong>of</strong> the company, in linewith the company’s growth. This w<strong>as</strong> however lower than the corresponding incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 56.06% in the total income<strong>of</strong> the company from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010, on account <strong>of</strong> which the employee remuneration <strong>and</strong> benefits, <strong>as</strong> apercentage <strong>of</strong> total income decre<strong>as</strong>ed from 4.39% in fiscal 2009 to 3.75% in fiscal 2010.Other Expenses: Our other expenses incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 92.08 million in fiscal 2010 from Rs. 62.60 million in fiscal2009, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 47.09%. This incre<strong>as</strong>e w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong> a significant incre<strong>as</strong>e in the rent, rates <strong>and</strong>taxes, legal <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional fees incurred during the year <strong>and</strong> the discount expenses borne by the company onaccount <strong>of</strong> the tri-partite bill discounting arrangement with HDFC Bank <strong>and</strong> Tata Motors. These other expensesrepresented 4.68% <strong>of</strong> our total income in fiscal 2010 versus 4.96% <strong>of</strong> our total income in fiscal 2009.<strong>Interest</strong> Expenses: Our interest expenses incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 68.32 million in fiscal 2010 from Rs. 53.79 million infiscal 2009, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 27.01%. This w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong> an incre<strong>as</strong>e in interest paid on the term loanavailed from SBI <strong>and</strong> an incre<strong>as</strong>e in financial charges on account <strong>of</strong> the new term loan availed from Axis BankLimited for the Railway Project, even <strong>as</strong> the interest on working capital <strong>and</strong> c<strong>as</strong>h credit facilities decre<strong>as</strong>ed onaccount <strong>of</strong> the decre<strong>as</strong>e in the interest rates in fiscal year 2010 <strong>as</strong> compared to fiscal year 2009. Consequently, <strong>as</strong> apercentage <strong>of</strong> total income, interest expense fell to 3.47% in fiscal 2010 from 4.26% in fiscal 2009.Depreciation / Amortization: Our depreciation expense for fiscal 2010 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 36.39 million which marks <strong>as</strong>ignificant incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 117.38% over fiscal 2009 when it w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 16.74 million. This w<strong>as</strong> mainly because thedepreciation expense recognized in the fiscal 2009 w<strong>as</strong> only for a certain period during the year, post the completion<strong>of</strong> the capital expenditure activities in that year. In comparison, fiscal 2010 recorded depreciation expense for thefull year on the Indore <strong>and</strong> Jamshedpur plants, which were commissioned during fiscal 2009, while also recordingsome depreciation expense on the capital expenditure incurred by us during fiscal 2010. On account <strong>of</strong> the same, <strong>as</strong>a percentage <strong>of</strong> total income, depreciation expense rose to 1.85% in fiscal 2009 from 1.33% in fiscal 2008.Pr<strong>of</strong>it before Tax: Our pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 308.01 million in fiscal 2010 from Rs. 23.44 million infiscal 2009, representing an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 1214.04%. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax incre<strong>as</strong>edsignificantly to 15.65% in fiscal 2010 from 1.86% in fiscal 2009. The higher pr<strong>of</strong>itability w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong>higher business volumes, execution <strong>of</strong> adhoc high-margin steel fabrication job works <strong>and</strong> the comparatively lowerincre<strong>as</strong>e in the total expenditure <strong>as</strong> compared to fiscal 2009.Provision for Taxation: Our total provision for taxation for fiscal 2010 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 105.02 million, which represented a1023.21% incre<strong>as</strong>e from the provision <strong>of</strong> Rs. 9.35 million made in fiscal 2009, in line with the significant incre<strong>as</strong>e inthe pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax. This accounted for 5.33% <strong>of</strong> the total income for the fiscal 2010 <strong>as</strong> compared to 0.74% <strong>of</strong> thetotal income for the fiscal 2009.Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>: Our net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> for fiscal 2010 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 191.97 million, <strong>as</strong>ignificant incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 1002.01% from fiscal 2009 when we recorded net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> <strong>of</strong> Rs. 17.42million. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, the net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> jumped significantly to 9.75% in fiscal2010 from 1.38% in fiscal 2009.Comparison <strong>of</strong> Performance <strong>and</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong> Developments for the financial year ended March 31, 2009 vis-à-visfinancial year ended March 31, 2008Sales <strong>and</strong> Income from Operations: Our sales <strong>and</strong> income from operations decre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 1,708.27 million infiscal 2009 from Rs. 1,987.22 million in fiscal 2008, representing a decre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 14.04%. This decre<strong>as</strong>e w<strong>as</strong> mainlyon account <strong>of</strong> lower sales <strong>of</strong> built bodies for commercial vehicles <strong>as</strong> an unprecedented dem<strong>and</strong> slowdown w<strong>as</strong>witnessed in the industry, on account <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis. This decline in our sales <strong>and</strong> income fromoperations w<strong>as</strong> much smaller <strong>as</strong> compared to the industry, mainly because we were able to retain our existing clients<strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> add new clients in the FBV space. Also, we commenced our activities in the railways division in fiscal2009 which added to our income from operations.165


Net Sales: Our net sales decre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 1,120.46 million in fiscal 2009 from Rs. 1,192.08 million in fiscal 2008,representing a decre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 6.01%. This decre<strong>as</strong>e in our net sales w<strong>as</strong> much lower <strong>as</strong> compared to the decre<strong>as</strong>e in oursales <strong>and</strong> income from operations mainly on account <strong>of</strong> the lower excise duties in line with the fiscal packageannounced by the Government <strong>of</strong> India. Our net sales <strong>as</strong> a percentage <strong>of</strong> total income, decre<strong>as</strong>ed from 94.27% infiscal 2008 to 88.82% in fiscal 2009, primarily on account <strong>of</strong> an incre<strong>as</strong>e in the inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, workin progress <strong>and</strong> scrap during the fiscal 2009 <strong>as</strong> compared to fiscal 2008. Our net sales <strong>of</strong> the commercial vehiclesdivision for fiscal 2009 were Rs. 1,093.69 million <strong>and</strong> Rs. 26.77 million from the railways division.Other Income: Our other income decre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 47.76 million in fiscal 2009 from Rs. 57.67 million in fiscal 2008,representing a decre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 17.18%.Our other income declined on account <strong>of</strong> lower income from sale <strong>of</strong> scrap <strong>and</strong>lower income from transportation in line with the lower production recorded during the year. As a component <strong>of</strong>total income, other income dipped to 3.79% in fiscal 2009 from 4.56% in fiscal 2008.Incre<strong>as</strong>e in Inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work in progress <strong>and</strong> scrap: Our inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work inprogress <strong>and</strong> scrap incre<strong>as</strong>ed in fiscal 2009 by Rs. 93.30 million <strong>as</strong> against an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Rs. 14.74 million in fiscal2008. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, this accounted for 7.40% in fiscal 2009 <strong>as</strong> against 1.17% in fiscal 2008.Total Income: Our total income decre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 1,261.52 million in fiscal 2009 from Rs. 1264.49 million in fiscal2008, representing a marginal decre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 0.23%. The main re<strong>as</strong>on for the decre<strong>as</strong>e in total income w<strong>as</strong> the trickledown effect <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis, which led to a huge liquidity crisis; the consequential lack <strong>of</strong> availability<strong>of</strong> credit to fund vehicle purch<strong>as</strong>es resulted in the huge fall in dem<strong>and</strong> for commercial vehicles <strong>and</strong> consequentlyresulted in a fall in the net sales. The incre<strong>as</strong>e in the inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work in progress <strong>and</strong> scrapduring the fiscal 2009, <strong>of</strong>fset the fall in net sales, resulting in the above mentioned marginal decre<strong>as</strong>e in totalincome.Manufacturing Expenses: Our manufacturing expenses incre<strong>as</strong>ed by 5.27% to Rs. 1,049.60 million for fiscal 2009from Rs. 997.08 million in fiscal 2008. This saw a significant jump to 83.20% <strong>of</strong> the total income for fiscal 2009from 78.85% in fiscal 2008. This incre<strong>as</strong>e occurred mainly on account <strong>of</strong> higher prices <strong>of</strong> raw materials like steel<strong>and</strong> stores / spares, which is reflected in the 5.09% incre<strong>as</strong>e in the net consumption <strong>of</strong> raw materials to Rs. 921.93million in fiscal 2009 from Rs. 877.30 million in fiscal 2008 <strong>and</strong> the 17.08% incre<strong>as</strong>e in the net consumption <strong>of</strong>stores / spares to Rs. 67.94 million in fiscal 2009 from Rs. 58.03 million in fiscal 2008. As a component <strong>of</strong> totalincome, this accounted for 4.39% in fiscal 2009 <strong>as</strong> against 3.53% in fiscal 2008.Employee Remuneration <strong>and</strong> Benefits: Our employee remuneration <strong>and</strong> benefits incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 55.35 million infiscal 2009 from Rs. 44.66 million in fiscal 2008, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 23.94%. We had envisaged the continuation <strong>of</strong>growth in our business in fiscal 2009 <strong>and</strong> incre<strong>as</strong>ed our headcount from fiscal 2008 in anticipation. We had alsodoled out increments to our work force in order to supplement our estimated higher business volumes.Other Expenses: Our other expenses incre<strong>as</strong>ed slightly to Rs. 62.60 million in fiscal 2009 from Rs. 62.29 million infiscal 2008, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 0.50%. This incre<strong>as</strong>e w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong> writing <strong>of</strong>f certain capital work inprogress, adverse exchange rate fluctuations <strong>and</strong> some net loss on the sale <strong>of</strong> fixed <strong>as</strong>sets. These other expensesrepresented 4.96% <strong>of</strong> our total income in fiscal 2009 versus 4.93% in fiscal 2008.<strong>Interest</strong> Expenses: Our interest expenses incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 53.79 million in fiscal 2009 from Rs. 45.12 million infiscal 2008, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 19.22%. This w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong> an incre<strong>as</strong>e in interest on working capital loans<strong>and</strong> c<strong>as</strong>h credit facilities <strong>and</strong> an incre<strong>as</strong>e in financial charges on account <strong>of</strong> lengthening <strong>of</strong> the working capital cyclein line with the global economic crisis. Consequently, <strong>as</strong> a percentage <strong>of</strong> total income, interest expense rose to4.26% in fiscal 2009 from 3.57% in fiscal 2008.Depreciation / Amortization: Our depreciation expense for fiscal 2009 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 16.74 million which marks anincre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 82.75% over fiscal 2008 when it w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 9.16 million. This w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong> the investmentmade by us during fiscal 2008 <strong>and</strong> the current fiscal the year in the expansion-cum-modernization programme <strong>of</strong> ourRichhai I <strong>and</strong> M<strong>and</strong>la factories in addition to the capital expenditure incurred for the factory in Pithampur nearIndore. Our gross block saw an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 146.83% from Rs. 134.61 million in fiscal 2008 to Rs. 332.26 million t<strong>of</strong>iscal 2009, mainly on account <strong>of</strong> the above capital expenditures, which consequently led to the substantial incre<strong>as</strong>ein depreciation. This incre<strong>as</strong>e in depreciation w<strong>as</strong> lower than the corresponding incre<strong>as</strong>e in the gross block, mainly166


ecause the depreciation expense w<strong>as</strong> recognized only for a certain period during this year, post the completion <strong>of</strong>the capital expenditure activities. The entire impact <strong>of</strong> the completion <strong>of</strong> the capital expenditure activities w<strong>as</strong> felt inthe subsequent fisal year 2010, <strong>as</strong> h<strong>as</strong> been explained above. As a result <strong>of</strong> the foregoing, <strong>as</strong> a percentage <strong>of</strong> totalincome, depreciation expense rose to 1.33% in fiscal 2009 from 0.72% in fiscal 2008.Pr<strong>of</strong>it before Tax: Our pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax decre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 23.44 million in fiscal 2009 from Rs. 106.18 million infiscal 2008, representing a decre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 77.92%. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax dippedsignificantly to 1.86% in fiscal 2009 from 8.40% in fiscal 2008, on account <strong>of</strong> a combination <strong>of</strong> the abovementioned factors.Provision for Taxation: Our total provision for taxation for fiscal 2009 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 9.35 million, which represented a77.18% decline from the Rs. 40.97 million in fiscal 2008 in line with the reduced pr<strong>of</strong>itability. This accounted for0.74% <strong>of</strong> the total income for the fiscal 2009 <strong>as</strong> compared to 3.24% <strong>of</strong> the total income for the fiscal 2008.Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>: Our net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> for fiscal 2009 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 17.42 million, a decline<strong>of</strong> 71.62% from fiscal 2008 when we recorded net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> <strong>of</strong> Rs. 61.39 million. As a component<strong>of</strong> total income, the net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> dipped significantly to 1.38% in fiscal 2009 from 4.85% in fiscal2008. The lower pr<strong>of</strong>itability w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong> lower business volumes, higher raw material costs, higherinterest costs <strong>and</strong> higher depreciation expenses <strong>as</strong> compared to fiscal 2008.Comparison <strong>of</strong> Performance <strong>and</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong> Developments for the financial year ended March 31, 2008 vis-à-visfinancial year ended March 31, 2007Sales <strong>and</strong> Income from Operations: Our sales <strong>and</strong> income from operations incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 1,987.22 million in fiscal2008 from Rs. 1,663.99 million in fiscal 2007, representing an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 19.42%. This incre<strong>as</strong>e w<strong>as</strong> mainly onaccount <strong>of</strong> higher volumes <strong>of</strong> commercial vehicle bodies which were manufactured <strong>and</strong> sold during fiscal 2008 <strong>as</strong>compared to fiscal 2007 in line with the incre<strong>as</strong>ing dem<strong>and</strong> for commercial vehicles by our key customers.Net Sales: Our net sales incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 1,192.08 million in fiscal 2008 from Rs. 956.34 million in fiscal 2007,representing an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 24.65%. We paid excise duties <strong>of</strong> Rs. 795.14 million in fiscal 2008 <strong>as</strong> compared to Rs.707.65 million paid in fiscal 2007. Our net sales <strong>as</strong> a percentage <strong>of</strong> total income decre<strong>as</strong>ed to 94.27% in fiscal 2008from 94.29% in fiscal 2007 on account <strong>of</strong> an incre<strong>as</strong>e in the inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work in progress <strong>and</strong>scrap during fiscal 2008 <strong>as</strong> compared to fiscal 2007.Other Income: Our other income incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 57.67 million in fiscal 2008 from Rs. 26.49 million in fiscal 2007,an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 117.70%. This w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong> a one-time refund from the Provident Fund <strong>and</strong> substantialinterest income from fixed deposits made by the company from part <strong>of</strong> the equity investment amount <strong>of</strong> NYLIM,before the funds were allocated to capital projects. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, other income rose to 4.61% infiscal 2008 from 2.56% in fiscal 2007.Incre<strong>as</strong>e in Inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work in progress <strong>and</strong> scrap: Our inventory <strong>of</strong> finished products, work inprogress <strong>and</strong> scrap incre<strong>as</strong>ed in fiscal 2008 by Rs. 14.74 million against an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Rs. 51.14 million in fiscal2007. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, this accounted for 1.17% in fiscal 2008 <strong>as</strong> against 4.95% in fiscal 2007.Total Income: Our total income incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 1264.49 million in fiscal 2008 from Rs. 1033.97 million in fiscal2007, representing an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 22.29%, on account <strong>of</strong> the above factors.Manufacturing Expenses: Our manufacturing expenses incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 997.08 million for fiscal 2008 from Rs.821.09 million in fiscal 2007, a growth <strong>of</strong> 21.43%. This incre<strong>as</strong>e occurred mainly on account <strong>of</strong> higher prices <strong>of</strong> rawmaterials like steel, which is reflected in the 24.14% incre<strong>as</strong>e in the net consumption <strong>of</strong> raw materials to Rs. 877.30million in fiscal 2008 from Rs. 706.73 million in fiscal 2007. This represented 78.85% <strong>of</strong> the total income for thefiscal 2008 <strong>as</strong> against 79.41% in the fiscal 2007, <strong>as</strong> other expenses grew f<strong>as</strong>ter than manufacturing expenses in fiscal2008 <strong>as</strong> compared to fiscal 2007.Employee Remuneration <strong>and</strong> Benefits: Our employee remuneration <strong>and</strong> benefits incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 44.66 million infiscal 2008 from Rs. 31.36 million in fiscal 2007, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 42.41%. This w<strong>as</strong> on account <strong>of</strong> an incre<strong>as</strong>e in the167


headcount from fiscal 2007 <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> providing an incremental rise in salaries <strong>of</strong> our employees. This represented3.53% <strong>of</strong> our total income for fiscal 2008 <strong>as</strong> compared to 3.03% in fiscal 2007.Other Expenses: Our other expenses incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 62.29 million in fiscal 2008 from Rs. 37.96 million in fiscal2007, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 64.09%. This incre<strong>as</strong>e w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong> a one <strong>of</strong>f pr<strong>of</strong>essional fees in relation to theequity investment <strong>of</strong> NYLIM <strong>and</strong> higher freight expenses due to higher business volumes. This represented 4.93%<strong>of</strong> our total income in fiscal 2008 versus 3.67% in fiscal 2007.<strong>Interest</strong> Expenses: Our interest expenses incre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 45.12 million in fiscal 2008 from Rs. 25.06 million infiscal 2007, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 80.05%. This incre<strong>as</strong>e w<strong>as</strong> mainly on account <strong>of</strong> higher working capital requirements onaccount <strong>of</strong> incre<strong>as</strong>ed sales <strong>and</strong> income from operations. As a percentage <strong>of</strong> total income, interest expenses rose to3.57% in fiscal 2008 from 2.42% in fiscal 2007.Depreciation / Amortization: Our depreciation expense for fiscal 2008 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 9.16 million which marks an incre<strong>as</strong>e<strong>of</strong> 22.30% over fiscal 2007, when it w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 7.49 million. The company embarked on an expansion-cummodernizationplan for the Richhai-I <strong>and</strong> the M<strong>and</strong>la factories from the proceeds <strong>of</strong> the equity investment made byNYLIM in August 2007 on account <strong>of</strong> which the gross block went up from Rs. 84.49 million in fiscal 2007 to Rs.134.61 million in fiscal 2008.Pr<strong>of</strong>it before Tax: Our pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax decre<strong>as</strong>ed to Rs. 106.18 million in fiscal 2008 from Rs. 111.01 million infiscal 2007, representing a marginal decre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 4.35%. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax dipped to8.40% in fiscal 2008 from 10.74% in fiscal 2007, on account <strong>of</strong> a combination <strong>of</strong> the above mentioned factors.Provision for Taxation: Our total provision for taxation for fiscal 2008 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 40.97 million in fiscal 2008, whichrepresented a marginal incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 3.91% from Rs. 39.43 million in fiscal 2007. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income,provision for tax dipped to 3.24% in fiscal 2008 from 3.81% in fiscal 2007.Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>: For the re<strong>as</strong>ons above, our net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> for fiscal 2008 w<strong>as</strong> Rs.61.39 million, a decline <strong>of</strong> 27.93% from fiscal 2007 when the company recorded net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> <strong>of</strong>Rs. 85.18 million. As a component <strong>of</strong> total income, the net pr<strong>of</strong>it after tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong> dipped to 4.85% in fiscal 2008from 8.24% in fiscal 2007. The lower pr<strong>of</strong>itability w<strong>as</strong> on account <strong>of</strong> a significant incre<strong>as</strong>e in employeeremuneration <strong>and</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> a significant incre<strong>as</strong>e in other expenses on account <strong>of</strong> the one <strong>of</strong>f pr<strong>of</strong>essional feesincurred during the private equity investment in the Company.LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCESHistorically, our primary liquidity requirements have been to finance our working capital needs <strong>and</strong> capitalexpenditure. Our business requires a significant amount <strong>of</strong> working capital to finance the purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> raw materials<strong>and</strong> goods for executing orders for building commercial vehicle bodies, refurbishment <strong>of</strong> wagons <strong>and</strong> themanufacturing <strong>of</strong> components in the railway division. We tend to receive payments on an irregular b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>as</strong> work iscompleted <strong>and</strong> only after the client/consultant certifies the extent <strong>of</strong> the progress made on the particular project. T<strong>of</strong>und our capital needs, we have relied on short-term <strong>and</strong> long-term borrowings, working capital financing <strong>and</strong> c<strong>as</strong>hflows from operating activities. Specifically, the secured loans availed by us have incre<strong>as</strong>ed from Rs. 90.28 million<strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2006 to Rs. 544.66 million <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2010. During this five year period, our secured loansincre<strong>as</strong>ed significantly from Rs. 90.28 million <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2006 to Rs. 339.87 million <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2007,mainly on account <strong>of</strong> a significant incre<strong>as</strong>e in our working capital facilities from Rs. 61.73 million <strong>as</strong> at March 31,2006 to Rs. 310.93 million <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2007, in line with the incre<strong>as</strong>e in our income <strong>and</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> operations.We have also undertaken significant capital expenditure during the l<strong>as</strong>t five years, which is seen from the fact thatour gross block h<strong>as</strong> incre<strong>as</strong>ed from Rs. 61.47 million <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2006 to Rs. 364.82 million <strong>as</strong> at March 31,2010. As we continue to exp<strong>and</strong> in the future, our capital needs will incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>and</strong> we may need to raise additionalcapital through further debt finance <strong>and</strong>/or additional issues <strong>of</strong> Equity Shares to fund our operations. For furtherdetails regarding our capitalisation, refer to Annexure XXIV <strong>of</strong> the section “Financial Statements” beginning onpage F-1 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus, which contains the Summary Statement <strong>of</strong> Capitalisation, <strong>as</strong> Re<strong>stated</strong>, prepared inaccordance with the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations.168


CASH FLOWThe table below summarizes our c<strong>as</strong>h flows <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>, for the periods indicated:(Rs. in million)ParticularsFor the year ended March 31,2010 2009 2008 2007 2006Net C<strong>as</strong>h (used in) / from Operating activities (212.23) 292.43 40.70 (190.23) (28.11)Net C<strong>as</strong>h used in Investing activities (198.41) (180.36) (73.47) (19.52) (14.62)Net C<strong>as</strong>h from / (used in) Financing activities 407.56 (286.02) 209.12 239.10 46.76Net incre<strong>as</strong>e / (decre<strong>as</strong>e) in c<strong>as</strong>h <strong>and</strong> c<strong>as</strong>hequivalents(3.08) (173.95) 176.35 29.34 4.03C<strong>as</strong>h flow from operationsOur net c<strong>as</strong>h used in operating activities w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 212.23 million for fiscal 2010. The net pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong><strong>of</strong> Rs. 310.56 million coupled with the non-c<strong>as</strong>h depreciation during the period at Rs. 36.39 million, adjusted forinterest paid <strong>of</strong> Rs. 68.32 million <strong>and</strong> other operational adjustments resulted in an operating pr<strong>of</strong>it before workingcapital changes <strong>of</strong> Rs. 407.82 million for fiscal year 2010 <strong>as</strong> compared to Rs. 86.26 million for fiscal year 2009. Postworking capital changes <strong>and</strong> adjustments for the net income tax, the net c<strong>as</strong>h used in operations during fiscal 2010stood at Rs. 212.23 million, primarily on account <strong>of</strong> a significant jump in the inventories <strong>and</strong> trade <strong>and</strong> otherreceivables <strong>as</strong> compared to fiscal year 2009.Our net c<strong>as</strong>h generated from operating activities w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 292.43 million for fiscal 2009. The net pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax, <strong>as</strong>re<strong>stated</strong> <strong>of</strong> Rs. 26.47 million coupled with the non-c<strong>as</strong>h depreciation during the period at Rs. 16.74 million, adjustedfor interest paid <strong>of</strong> Rs. 53.79 million <strong>and</strong> other operational adjustments resulted in an operating pr<strong>of</strong>it beforeworking capital changes <strong>of</strong> Rs. 86.26 million. Post working capital changes <strong>and</strong> adjustments for the net income tax,the net c<strong>as</strong>h generated from operations during fiscal 2009 stood at Rs. 292.43 million, primarily on account <strong>of</strong>lengthening <strong>of</strong> the working capital cycle in line with the global economic crisis. The company w<strong>as</strong> able to reportpositive operating c<strong>as</strong>h flows during fiscal 2009, despite the difficult business environment, mainly because itscurrent liabilities rose significantly from Rs. 220.58 million <strong>as</strong> at March 31, 2008 to Rs. 485.47 million <strong>as</strong> at March31, 2009, an incre<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 120.09%, which w<strong>as</strong> contributed in part by the incre<strong>as</strong>e in creditors for capital goods to thetune <strong>of</strong> Rs. 79.05 million, on account <strong>of</strong> the capital expenditure incurred during the year.Our net c<strong>as</strong>h generated from operating activities in fiscal 2008 w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 40.70 million. The net pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax, <strong>as</strong>re<strong>stated</strong> <strong>of</strong> Rs. 99.64 million coupled with the non-c<strong>as</strong>h depreciation during the period at Rs. 9.16 million, adjustedfor interest paid <strong>of</strong> Rs. 45.12 million <strong>and</strong> other operational adjustments resulted in an operating pr<strong>of</strong>it beforeworking capital changes <strong>of</strong> Rs. 139.22 million. Post working capital changes <strong>and</strong> adjustments for the net income tax,the net c<strong>as</strong>h generated from operations during fiscal 2008 stood lower at Rs. 40.70 million, primarily because wepared down our outst<strong>and</strong>ing trade payables position towards the year end significantly.C<strong>as</strong>h flow from investing activitiesOur net c<strong>as</strong>h utilized in investing activities w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 198.41 million in fiscal 2010 <strong>and</strong> consisted primarily <strong>of</strong>expenditure on the purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> fixed <strong>as</strong>sets , in line with our capital expenditure plans.Our net c<strong>as</strong>h utilized in investing activities w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 180.36 million in the fiscal 2009 <strong>and</strong> consisted <strong>of</strong> expenditure onexpansion-cum-modernization <strong>of</strong> our Richhai-I <strong>and</strong> M<strong>and</strong>la factories, <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> completing the factory at Pithampurnear Indore.Our net c<strong>as</strong>h utilized in investing activities w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 73.47 million in fiscal 2008. This w<strong>as</strong> primarily due toexpenditure in relation to the expansion <strong>and</strong> modernization <strong>of</strong> our Richhai Factory-I <strong>and</strong> the M<strong>and</strong>la Factory.C<strong>as</strong>h flow from financing activities169


Our net c<strong>as</strong>h flow from financing activities w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 407.56 million for fiscal 2010, primarily due to incre<strong>as</strong>e in oursecured <strong>and</strong> unsecured loans from an aggregate <strong>of</strong> Rs. 71.80 million <strong>as</strong> on March 31, 2009 to Rs. 547.68 million <strong>as</strong>on March 31, 2010.Our net c<strong>as</strong>h outflow from financing activities w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 286.02 million for fiscal 2009, primarily due to reduction inour working capital loans in line with the reduced business activity during the year on account <strong>of</strong> the economic slowdown.Our net c<strong>as</strong>h inflow from financing activities w<strong>as</strong> Rs. 209.12 million for fiscal 2008, which w<strong>as</strong> primarily due to theprivate equity investment <strong>of</strong> Rs. 300.00 million from NYLIM, part <strong>of</strong> which w<strong>as</strong> utilized towards fund the workingcapital requirements.Capital Expenditures:Historically, our company h<strong>as</strong> incurred capital expenditures in the normal course <strong>of</strong> its business in relation to theexpansion <strong>of</strong> existing facilities <strong>and</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> new manufacturing facilities <strong>and</strong> is expected to continueincurring such capital expenditures in the future. Our Company’s capital expenditures, cl<strong>as</strong>sified <strong>as</strong> additions to theGross Block (net <strong>of</strong> deductions) amounted to Rs. 32.56 million for the fiscal year 2010, Rs. 197.65 million for thefiscal year 2009 <strong>and</strong> Rs. 50.12 million for the fiscal year 2008.(i) Unusual or Infrequent Events or transactionsThere have been no unusual or infrequent events or transaction that would have any material impact on theoperations or the performance <strong>of</strong> the company.(ii) Significant economic/ regulatory changesThe Government <strong>of</strong> India had reduced excise duty payable on commercial vehicles from 14% to 10% to 8% <strong>as</strong> part<strong>of</strong> its fiscal package, in light <strong>of</strong> the global economic crisis. However in the Finance Bill 2010-2011, this h<strong>as</strong> beenincre<strong>as</strong>ed back to 10% in light <strong>of</strong> the revival in this industry.Fiscal 2009 turned out to be significantly challenging year for the company on account <strong>of</strong> the plummetingcommercial vehicle sales due to the global economic crisis. However, the event affected all industries <strong>and</strong> sectors<strong>and</strong> we were no exception to the impact <strong>of</strong> the crisis.Apart from the above mentioned, there have been no significant economic or regulatory changes which would haveany material impact on our operations. For details <strong>of</strong> Regulations & Policies ple<strong>as</strong>e refer to the section titled“Regulations <strong>and</strong> Policies” beginning on page 97 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.(iii) Known trends or uncertainties<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> described in the section titled "Risk Factors" beginning on page XIII <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus <strong>and</strong> the sectiontitled "Management’s Discussion <strong>and</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong> Financial Conditions <strong>and</strong> Results <strong>of</strong> Operations" beginning onpage 156 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus, to our knowledge, there are no known trends or uncertainties that have or had or areexpected to have any material adverse impact on sales or income <strong>of</strong> our Company from operations.(iv) Future changes in relationship between cost <strong>and</strong> revenuesOther than <strong>as</strong> described in the section titled “Risk Factors” <strong>and</strong> “Management’s Discussion <strong>and</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong>Financial Conditions <strong>and</strong> Results <strong>of</strong> Operations” beginning on pages XIII <strong>and</strong> 156 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus, to ourknowledge, there are no future relationships between cost <strong>and</strong> income that have or had or are expected to have amaterial adverse impact on our operation <strong>and</strong> finances.(v) Competitive conditions170


For details on competition, ple<strong>as</strong>e refer to the section titled “Our Business” beginning on page 77 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.171


FINANCIAL INDEBTEDNESSAs <strong>of</strong> March 31, 2010, we have Rs. 547.68 million <strong>of</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing indebtednessSecured LoansSet forth below is a brief summary <strong>of</strong> our long term, short term <strong>and</strong> working capital facilities <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> March 31, 2010together with a brief description <strong>of</strong> certain material covenants <strong>of</strong> the relevant financing agreements:1. Name <strong>of</strong> the Lender: State Bank <strong>of</strong> IndiaLoanDocumentationTotalAmount/Lines <strong>of</strong>CreditSanctionedAmountavailed <strong>as</strong><strong>of</strong> March31, 2010<strong>Interest</strong>RateRepayment ScheduleSecurityCreated/GuaranteesProvided(a) SanctionLetter datedMarch 5, 2010bearingreference no.RASMECC/JBP/09-(2), (3), (4),10/738(5), (6) <strong>and</strong> (7).(b) SanctionLetter datedAugust 28,2009 bearingreference no.RASMECC/90—10- 383(c) Letter forgrant <strong>of</strong>individuallimits withinoverall limitdated August29, 2009.(d) Agreement<strong>of</strong> Loan datedFebruary 29,2008(e)SupplementaryDeed <strong>of</strong>Guarantee datedAugust 29,2009 <strong>and</strong> Deed<strong>of</strong> Guaranteefor OverallLimit datedFebruary 29,2008 executedby Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta <strong>and</strong> Mr.Ajay GuptaRs. 437.5million h<strong>as</strong>beensanctioned<strong>as</strong> follows:FundB<strong>as</strong>edLoan:1) C<strong>as</strong>hCredit <strong>of</strong>up to Rs.120 million(includesbook debts)2) Ad HocC<strong>as</strong>hCredit <strong>of</strong>upto 100million(includesbook debts)3) TermLoan <strong>of</strong> upto Rs. 120million4) Car loan<strong>of</strong> Rs. 2.5million5) AdhocC<strong>as</strong>hCredit <strong>of</strong>up to Rs.100 millionNon- FundB<strong>as</strong>ed (8) :6) Letter <strong>of</strong>Credit <strong>of</strong>up to Rs.FundB<strong>as</strong>edLoan:1) C<strong>as</strong>hCredit- Rs.203.478million2) TermLoan- Rs.101.167millionNon- FundB<strong>as</strong>ed (8) :3) Letter <strong>of</strong>Credit- Rs.1.265million4) BankGuarantees-Rs. 29.537million(i) On C<strong>as</strong>hCredit (1) :14.25% p.a.(ii) OnAdhoc C<strong>as</strong>hCredit: 14.5% p.a.(iii) OnTermLoan (1) <strong>and</strong> (7) :13.25% p.a.(iv)Commissionon letter <strong>of</strong>credit <strong>as</strong> perLender’sextantinstructions.(v)Commissionon bankguarantee <strong>as</strong>per the ratesstipulatedby theLender.(vi) On carloan:Depends onthe tenureopted by theCompany.The currentapplicablerates are (a)upto 3 years– 11%; (b)beyond 3years –11.25%; (c)beyond 5years but up(i) C<strong>as</strong>h Credit is valid for a period <strong>of</strong> one yearfrom the date <strong>of</strong> sanction <strong>of</strong> the facility beingAugust 24, 2009, subject to review every sixmonths (1A) .(ii) Adhoc C<strong>as</strong>h Credit shall be valid for a period <strong>of</strong>6 months from the date <strong>of</strong> first rele<strong>as</strong>e.(iii) The term loan is repayable in 33 monthlyinstallments <strong>as</strong> below:Year2009-20102010-20112011-20122012-2013Amount <strong>of</strong>Installments0.20*3 &0.35*4w.e.fSeptember,09No. <strong>of</strong>InstallmentsTotal(inmillion)7 20.000.35 12 420.35 12 420.80*2 2 1633 120(iv) The period for which letter <strong>of</strong> credit facility h<strong>as</strong>been sanctioned is 1 year.(v) The period for which bank guarantee facilityh<strong>as</strong> been sanctioned is 1 year.(i) Primarysecurity:Hypothecation byway <strong>of</strong> first chargeon pari p<strong>as</strong>su b<strong>as</strong>is(shared with HSBCfor its workingcapital finance to theCompany describedbelow), on entirecurrent <strong>as</strong>setsconsisting <strong>of</strong> stocks<strong>of</strong> raw materials,stock-in-process,finished goods,consumables stores<strong>and</strong> spares, bookdebts, outst<strong>and</strong>ingmoneys, receivables<strong>and</strong> bills, etc., at theCompany’s godown,factory premises <strong>and</strong>those in transit<strong>and</strong>/or at such otherplaces <strong>as</strong> may beapproved by theLender from time totime.Term Loan:A first <strong>and</strong> exclusivecharge on thefollowing fixed<strong>as</strong>sets <strong>of</strong> theCompany situated atthe followingpremises <strong>and</strong>equitable mortgage<strong>of</strong> the followingpremises:172


(f)SupplementaryDeed <strong>of</strong>Guarantee datedAugust 29,2009 <strong>and</strong> Deed<strong>of</strong> Guaranteefor OverallLimit datedMarch 11, 2008executed byMs. RekhaGupta(g)SupplementaryDeed <strong>of</strong>Guarantee datedSeptember 11,2009 <strong>and</strong> Deed<strong>of</strong> Guaranteefor OverallLimit datedMarch 7, 2008executed by Mr.Arun Gupta(h)SupplementaryDeed <strong>of</strong>Guarantee <strong>of</strong>2009 <strong>and</strong> Deed<strong>of</strong> Guaranteefor OverallLimit datedMarch 7, 2008executed by Mr.Vineet Gupta87.5million7) BankGuarantees<strong>of</strong> up to Rs.60 millionto 7 years –11.50%IIRichhai FactoryM<strong>and</strong>la FactoryIndore Factory2. CollateralSecurity:• First charge byway <strong>of</strong> extension<strong>of</strong> EquitableMortgage onRichhai Factory Ipari p<strong>as</strong>su withcharge <strong>of</strong> HSBC(credit under itsfacilitiesdescribed below).(SBI’s pari p<strong>as</strong>sushare is 79.79%)<strong>and</strong>hypothecation bythe way <strong>of</strong>charge on theplant <strong>and</strong>machinerysituated atRichhai FactoryI.• Equitablemortgage <strong>of</strong> flatsdescribed at *below• Residual Chargeon the followingcollateralsecurities for theworking capitalfinance. Theirdetails are:1. Richhai Factory II2. M<strong>and</strong>la Factory3. Indore Factory(iii) Secured bypersonal guarantee <strong>of</strong>the following persons:• Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta• Ms. RekhaGupta• Mr. Ajay Gupta• Mr. VineetCh<strong>and</strong>ra• Mr. ArunGupta3. The Lenderwill have a firstcharge on thepr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> theCompany, afterprovision fortaxation <strong>and</strong>dividend whereapplicable, forrepayment <strong>of</strong>installmentsunder term loan173


_____________granted ordeferredpaymentguaranteesexecuted by theLender or otherrepaymentobligation, ifany, due fromthe Company tothe Lender.(1) The interest rates provided above are subject to enhancement <strong>and</strong> penal interest in c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> breach by the Company <strong>of</strong> terms <strong>and</strong>conditions contained in the sanction letter dated August 28, 2009.(1A) Repayable on dem<strong>and</strong>.(2) Some <strong>of</strong> the important actions for which the Company will require prior written permission <strong>of</strong> the Lender are <strong>as</strong> under:a) Effect any change in the Company’s capital structure specifically the shareholding <strong>of</strong> the directors, if any, <strong>and</strong> other principalshareholders <strong>and</strong> promoters <strong>of</strong> the Company;b) Undertake any new project, implement any scheme <strong>of</strong> expansion or acquire fixed <strong>as</strong>sets except those indicated in the funds flowstatement submitted to the Lender from time to time <strong>and</strong> approved by the Lender;c) Enter into borrowing arrangement either secured or unsecured with any other Lender, financial institution, company or otherwiseor accept deposits apart from the arrangement indicated in the funds flow statements submitted to the Lender from time to time<strong>and</strong> approved by the Lender;d) Change the practice with regard to remuneration <strong>of</strong> directors including by means <strong>of</strong> ordinary remuneration or commission, scaleor sitting fees;e) Undertake any trading activity other than the sale <strong>of</strong> products arising out <strong>of</strong> its own manufacturing operations;f) Permit any transfer <strong>of</strong> the controlling interest or make any dr<strong>as</strong>tic change in the management set-up;g) Repay monies brought in by the promoters / directors / principal shareholders <strong>and</strong> their friends <strong>and</strong> relatives by way <strong>of</strong> deposits,loans or advances. Further, the rate <strong>of</strong> interest, if any, payable on such deposits, loans or advances should be lower than the rate<strong>of</strong> interest charged by the Lender on its term loan <strong>and</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> such interest will be subject to regular re-payment <strong>of</strong>installment under term loans granted / deferred payment guarantees executed by the Lender or other repayment obligations, ifany, due from the Company to the Lender;h) Implementation <strong>of</strong> any scheme <strong>of</strong> expansion, modernization, diversification, renovation or acquisition <strong>of</strong> any fixed <strong>as</strong>sets duringany accounting year, except such schemes which have already been approved by the Lender;i) Formulate any scheme <strong>of</strong> amalgamation or reconstruction;j) Invest by way <strong>of</strong> share capital or lend or advance funds to or place deposits with any other concern, including sister / <strong>as</strong>sociate /family / subsidiary/ group concerns;k) Undertake guarantee obligations on behalf <strong>of</strong> any other company, firm or person;l) Declare dividends for any year except out <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its relating to that year after making all due <strong>and</strong> necessary provisions <strong>and</strong>provided further that no default h<strong>as</strong> occurred in any repayment obligations;m) Create any further charge, lien or encumbrance over the <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>and</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> the Company already charged to the Lender infavour <strong>of</strong> any other bank, financial institution, firm or person;n) Sell, <strong>as</strong>sign, mortgage or otherwise dispose <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the fixed <strong>as</strong>sets charged to the Lender;(3) The other significant provisions <strong>of</strong> the loan documentation are <strong>as</strong> follows:a) The Company shall keep the Lender informed <strong>of</strong> the happening <strong>of</strong> any event likely to have substantial effect on their pr<strong>of</strong>it orbusiness, the Company will inform the Lender accordingly, with explanations <strong>and</strong> the remedial steps proposed to be taken.b) The Lender will have the right to appoint a nominee to attend any meeting <strong>of</strong> shareholders, where the right is exercised, theagenda papers <strong>and</strong> proceedings should be sent to the Lender sufficiently in advance.c) The Company is required to confine its entire business including foreign exchange business to the Lender.d) The Lender at its discretion can change the margin cover on the <strong>as</strong>sets.e) Any further issuance <strong>of</strong> shares by the Company would have to be intimated to the Lender.f) Any default by the Company in repayment <strong>of</strong> the term loan along with the interest due on it <strong>and</strong> other applicable charges couldresult in termination <strong>of</strong> the installments <strong>and</strong> the loan becoming payable at dem<strong>and</strong> by the Lender, at its discretion.(4) Letters <strong>of</strong> Credit will be opened for the purpose <strong>of</strong> purch<strong>as</strong>ing raw material <strong>and</strong> consumable stores <strong>and</strong> spares, including imported items,required by the Company in the normal course <strong>of</strong> their business. These will not be opened for the purpose <strong>of</strong> procuring capital goods underthe limit. The goods covered by the letter <strong>of</strong> credit will have to be fully insured against all transit risks. Further, in c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Import Letters <strong>of</strong>Credit an undertaking will have to be furnished by the Company stating that it will bear the exchange fluctuation risks <strong>and</strong> will arrange forforward cover whenever called upon to do so by the Lender.(5) The Lender will share a pari-p<strong>as</strong>su charge with the HSBC on Richhai Factory I in terms <strong>of</strong> an agreement executed between SBI <strong>and</strong> HSBCdated November 7, 2009.The exposure <strong>of</strong> HSBC for which pari p<strong>as</strong>su charge h<strong>as</strong> been created with the Lender in terms <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid agreement is Rs. 80 million<strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the Lender is Rs. 337.5 million.(6) Inter-changeable to the extent <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10 million from bank guarantee to the letter <strong>of</strong> credit limit <strong>and</strong> vice versa.174


(7) The personal guarantees have been furnished by Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, Ms. Rekha Gupta, Mr. Ajay Gupta, Mr. Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra <strong>and</strong> Mr. ArunGupta (collectively referred to <strong>as</strong> the “Guarantors”) for an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 337.5 million (the principal amount <strong>of</strong> the loan taken by theCompany from SBI) alongwith the interest payable on this amount <strong>and</strong> other charges that may be due <strong>and</strong> payable by the Company to theLender. The Guarantors have further agreed to furnish additional security that may be stipulated by the Lender from time to time to fufilltheir guarantee obligations. The Lender will be at liberty to sell such security deposited by the Guarantors upon giving requisite notice to theGuarantors in terms <strong>of</strong> the guarantee agreement. Some <strong>of</strong> the significant terms <strong>of</strong> the guarantee agreements are <strong>as</strong> follows:a) The Guarantors will not be entitled to benefit from the other securities that are held by the Lender in respect <strong>of</strong> the aforesaidcredit facilities.b) The guarantee is irrevocable <strong>and</strong> enforceable against the Guarantors notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing any dispute between the Lender <strong>and</strong> theCompany.* (i) Flat No. 14 on the first floor <strong>of</strong> a doubled storied residential row houses known <strong>as</strong> Dhiraj Apartment, constructed on part <strong>of</strong> Kh<strong>as</strong>ara No.149/1, 150/1, 150/2 out <strong>of</strong> total plot area <strong>of</strong> 9591 Sq. ft, Sr. No. 753 at Mouza-Hathital, Narmada Road, Gorakhpur, Tehsil <strong>and</strong> District-Jabalpur in the name <strong>of</strong> the Company(ii) Flat No. 5 in Ground Floor <strong>of</strong> a doubled storied residential row houses known <strong>as</strong> Dhiraj Apartment, constructed on part <strong>of</strong> Kh<strong>as</strong>ara Nos.149/1, 150/1, 150/2 out <strong>of</strong> total plot area <strong>of</strong> 9591 Sq. ft, Sr No. 753 at Mouza-Hathital, Narmada Road, Gorakhpur, Tehsil & District-Jabalpur in the name <strong>of</strong> the Company(iii) Flat No. 2,3,6,7 along with one single room No. 17 on Ground Floor <strong>and</strong> Flat No. 15 on the first floor <strong>of</strong> a doubled storied residentialrow houses known <strong>as</strong> Dhiraj Apartment, constructed on part <strong>of</strong> Kh<strong>as</strong>ara No. 149/1, 150/1, 150/2 out <strong>of</strong> total plot area <strong>of</strong> 9591 Sq. ft, Sr No.753 at Mouza-Hathital, Narmada road, Gorakhpur, Tehsil & District Jabalpur in the name <strong>of</strong> the Company(iv) Flat No. 9 & 10 on the first floor including terrace <strong>and</strong> porch adjoining to Flat No. 9 <strong>of</strong> a doubled storied residential row houses known<strong>as</strong> Dhiraj Apartment, constructed on part <strong>of</strong> Kh<strong>as</strong>ara No. 149/1, 150/1, 150/2 out <strong>of</strong> total plot area <strong>of</strong> 9591 Sq. ft, Sr. No. 753 at Mouza-Hathital, Narmada Road, Gorakhpur, Tehsil & District-Jabalpur in the name <strong>of</strong> the Company(v) Property situated at Block no. 36, Plot No. 2/29, Pachpedi, South Civil Lines, Jabalpur <strong>of</strong> Mr. Arun Gupta.2. Name <strong>of</strong> the Lender: Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC):Loan DocumentationTotal Amount/Lines <strong>of</strong> CreditSanctionedAmountavailed <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong>March 31, 2010<strong>Interest</strong> RateRepaymentScheduleSecurityCreated/GuaranteesProvideda) Letter agreement datedDecember 14, 2009 bearingreference numberFAL/FTG/MME/BOM/2009023(1), (3), (4) <strong>and</strong> (5)The facility is further renewedvide letter No.FAL/FTG/MME/BOM/21010002dated April 29, 2010b) Personal Guarantee datedDecember 16, 2009 executed byMr.Ajay Gupta.c) Personal Guarantee datedDecember 16, 2009 executed byDr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta.d) Personal Guarantee datedDecember 16, 2009 executed byMs. Rekha Gupta.Rs. 130 million(Including anadhoc limit <strong>of</strong>Rs. 50 million (2)<strong>and</strong> (6) )Rs 129.261million(i) <strong>Interest</strong> will becharged on a dailybalance, at amutually agreedrate, <strong>and</strong> will bepayable monthly inarrears.(i) Vendor financefacility- tenor <strong>of</strong> 90days.• First pari p<strong>as</strong>sucharge on stock &receivables for Rs.80 million.• First pari p<strong>as</strong>sucharge onmoveable fixed<strong>as</strong>sets for Rs. 80million• Personal guarantee<strong>of</strong> Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta, Mr. AjayGupta, Ms. RekhaGupta <strong>and</strong> Mr.Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra (8) .• Undated Chequesfor adhoc facilityamounting to Rs.50 million.• Equitablemortgage onRichhai Factory Ipari p<strong>as</strong>su withcharge <strong>of</strong> SBI.• Corporateguarantee fromCommercialAutomobilesPrivate Ltd. <strong>and</strong>Commercial BodyBuilders, (GroupCompanies <strong>of</strong> ourPromoter Director,Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta),for Rs. 80million.(1) Facilities provided by the Lender will be reviewed on August 30, 2010.175


(2) The Lender h<strong>as</strong> specifically placed a restriction that the adhoc facilities <strong>of</strong> Rs. 50 million can only be utilized for purch<strong>as</strong>es <strong>of</strong> stainless steelfrom the following vendors—Jindal Steel, Lloyd Steel, Pennar Steel, <strong>and</strong> Essar Hypermart. Further that this facility can only be utilized toexecute the railway orders.(3) The Lender h<strong>as</strong> stipulated certain financial covenants for the Financial Year 2011 which are enumerated <strong>as</strong> follows:Particulars (INR M)Minimum Sales 3000Minimum Pr<strong>of</strong>it before tax 500Minimum Tangible Net Worth 2000Maximum external gearingCovenantl.0xMaximum Total gearing 1.0x(4) The other significant provisions <strong>of</strong> the loan documentation are <strong>as</strong> follows:(i) Debtors greater than 90 days will be excluded from drawing power calculation.(ii) Any changes in the capital structure, schemes <strong>of</strong> amalgamation or re-construction must be informed to the Lender prior to it beingundertaken.(iii) Expenditure in new projects must be informed to the Lender unless this is covered by the Company's net c<strong>as</strong>h accruals after providingfor dividends, taxes, investments etc., or is covered by long term funds received for financing projects/expansions.(iv) The Company must inform the Lender prior to making any investment by way <strong>of</strong> share capital in, or lending, advancing funds to,placing deposits with or undertaking guarantee obligations on behalf <strong>of</strong> any other concern. Normal trade credit or security deposits inthe usual course <strong>of</strong> business, or advances to employees, are not covered by this covenant.(v) The Company must inform the Lender before entering into borrowing arrangements <strong>of</strong> any sort with any other bank, financialinstitutions or company.(vi) Dividends declared by the Company must be only out <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its relating to that year.(vii) Monies brought into the Company by principal shareholders/directors/depositors will not be withdrawn without prior intimation to theLender.(viii) The Company is required at all times to maintain sufficient long term funds to cover all long term <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>and</strong> a minimum <strong>of</strong> 25% <strong>of</strong>current <strong>as</strong>sets.(ix) The credit facilities can only be utilized for the purposes for which it h<strong>as</strong> been granted.(5) The Lender will share a pari-p<strong>as</strong>su charge with the SBI on Richhai Factory I in terms <strong>of</strong> an agreement executed between SBI <strong>and</strong> HSBCdated November 7, 2009.The exposure <strong>of</strong> SBI for which pari p<strong>as</strong>su charge h<strong>as</strong> been created with the Lender in terms <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid agreement is Rs. 337.5 million<strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the Lender is Rs. 80 million.(6) The margin on debtors will be 40 percent, while the margin on stocks will be 25 percent.(7) The Lender is entitled to revise the interest rate on the term loans every two years.(8) The personal guarantees have been furnished by Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, Mr. Ajay Gupta, Ms. Rekha Gupta <strong>and</strong> Mr. Vineet Ch<strong>and</strong>ra(collectively referred to <strong>as</strong> the “Guarantors”) in their individual capacities for an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 50 million together with the interest due<strong>and</strong> payable thereon <strong>and</strong> other credits or advances that may be due <strong>and</strong> payable by the Company to the Lender. Some <strong>of</strong> the significantterms <strong>of</strong> the guarantee agreements are <strong>as</strong> follows:a) The personal guarantee furnished by the Guarantors is an irrevocable <strong>and</strong> continuing guarantee.b) The Guarantors have agreed that any security taken by them from the Company in respect <strong>of</strong> this guarantee will not beenforced by the Guarantors to the prejudice <strong>of</strong> the Lender. Further, such security furnished by the Company to the Guarantorwill act <strong>as</strong> security for the Lender in respect <strong>of</strong> the loan <strong>and</strong> will have to be deposited by the Guarantor with the Lender.3. Name <strong>of</strong> the Lender: Yes Bank LimitedLoan DocumentationTotal Amount/Lines <strong>of</strong> CreditSanctionedAmount availed<strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> March 31,2010 <strong>Interest</strong> RateRepaymentScheduleSecurityCreated/GuaranteesProvidedSanction Letter dated Working(5) <strong>and</strong> (6)October 1, 2009Capitaldem<strong>and</strong> loan(including the c<strong>as</strong>hcredit limit) up toRs. 100 millionRs. 100 million 13% per annum (1),(2), (3) <strong>and</strong> (4)1. Working CapitalDem<strong>and</strong> Loan: Thetenure <strong>of</strong> the loan issix months, that is,the credit facility is• First Pari P<strong>as</strong>sucharge on current<strong>as</strong>sets <strong>of</strong> theCompany (7) .176


available until June22, 2011. This loanis repayable by theCompany on thel<strong>as</strong>t business day <strong>of</strong>the term for whichthe Lender h<strong>as</strong>granted the shortterm loan facility tothe Company.• Unconditional<strong>and</strong> Irrevocablepersonalguarantee <strong>of</strong> Mr.Ajay Gupta.2. C<strong>as</strong>h Credit: Thetenure <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>as</strong>hcredit facilityavailed by theCompany from theLender is twelvemonths. However,the availabilityperiod <strong>of</strong> this loan isup to June 22, 2011.This loan isrepayable by theCompany ondem<strong>and</strong>.(1) <strong>Interest</strong> on each advance shall be due <strong>and</strong> payable by the Company on the l<strong>as</strong>t business day <strong>of</strong> the term <strong>of</strong> the loan or on the l<strong>as</strong>tbusiness day <strong>of</strong> every calendar month or at such intervals <strong>as</strong> the Lender may stipulate.(2) <strong>Interest</strong> shall be payable at monthly rests.(3) Excess interest, overdue interest <strong>and</strong> default interest at 2% p.a. or such other rates may be levied by the Lender <strong>as</strong> it deems fit.(4) The rates in interest <strong>and</strong> periodicity <strong>of</strong> payment are subject to Lender’s internal review <strong>and</strong> changes in prevailing regulatory directives.(5) In the event disbursement(s)/ drawal(s) / utilization <strong>of</strong> the credit facility or any part there<strong>of</strong> are made pending creation <strong>and</strong> perfection<strong>of</strong> full <strong>and</strong> final security in favour <strong>of</strong> the Lender unless otherwise agreed by the Lender, the Company will pay additional interest atthe rate <strong>of</strong> 2% per annum over an above the applicable interest, from the date <strong>of</strong> first disbursement/drawal/utilization <strong>of</strong> the creditfacility till the date the security is fully <strong>and</strong> finally created <strong>and</strong> perfected to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Lender.(6) The other significant provisions <strong>of</strong> the loan documentation are <strong>as</strong> follows:(i) The Company is required to procure an insurance policy duly endorsed in Lender’s favour, covering 110% <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong><strong>as</strong>sets hypothecated/mortgaged to with the Lender.(ii) The Company h<strong>as</strong> agreed that it will not undertake or permit any reorganization, amalgamation, reconstruction, takeover orany other schemes <strong>of</strong> compromise or arrangement, nor amend any provision <strong>of</strong> its constitutive documents in such mannerthat will adversely affect the Lender’s rights under this credit facility.(iii) The Company is required to have itself rated by credit rating agency, <strong>as</strong> approved by the Lender, <strong>and</strong> have such rating doneannually or at such intervals <strong>as</strong> may be decided <strong>and</strong> intimated to the Company by the Lender from time to time.(iv) The Company hereby covenants that so long <strong>as</strong> the facilities or any sum there under from the Lender are outst<strong>and</strong>ing, theCompany shall maintain the following covenants:(a) Total Debt/ Net c<strong>as</strong>h accruals


(ix) Creation <strong>of</strong> encumbrance or security over <strong>as</strong>sets specifically charged to the Lender will require prior written permission <strong>of</strong>the Lender.(7) The Company is yet to create security on the aforementioned <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>of</strong> the Company in favour <strong>of</strong> the Lender. For further detailsin respect <strong>of</strong> the failure by the Company to create the specified security in favour <strong>of</strong> the Lender, refer to section on “RiskFactors” beginning on page XIII <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.4. Name <strong>of</strong> the Lender: AXIS Bank(i) Railway Project Loan <strong>and</strong> working capital facility granted in 2010LoanDocumentationTotal Amount/Lines <strong>of</strong> CreditSanctionedAmount availed<strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> March 31,2010<strong>Interest</strong> Rate Repayment Schedule SecurityCreated/GuaranteesProvided (^^)(a) Sanction letterdated March 9, 2010(**)Working CapitalFacilities (*), (^) <strong>and</strong> (~) :1) On c<strong>as</strong>h credit:11.75% p.a.1) C<strong>as</strong>h credit is repayableon dem<strong>and</strong>1) For C<strong>as</strong>h CreditFacility:1) C<strong>as</strong>h Credit <strong>of</strong> upto Rs.80 million2) Letter <strong>of</strong> credit(for other than capitalgoods) <strong>of</strong> upto Rs.80(2), <strong>and</strong> (3)million3) Bank Guarantee<strong>of</strong> upto Rs.80 million(4) <strong>and</strong> (5)Term Loan forRailway Project (#) ,(^) <strong>and</strong> (~)(a) A term loan <strong>of</strong>upto Rs.500 million (6)(**)(b) A Letter <strong>of</strong> Credit(Inl<strong>and</strong>/Import) forpurch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>and</strong> import<strong>of</strong> capital goods:For an amount <strong>of</strong>Rs.500 million. (10)This is a sub-limit <strong>of</strong>the term loan. (3)2) On Letter <strong>of</strong> credit:Charges equivalent to75% <strong>of</strong> the applicablest<strong>and</strong>ard rates <strong>of</strong> theLender.3) On bank guarantee:Commissionequivalent to 1.50%p.a.4) On Term loan:12% p.a.5) On Letter <strong>of</strong> credit(for capital goods):Charges equivalent to75% <strong>of</strong> the applicablest<strong>and</strong>ard rates <strong>of</strong> theLender.2) The letter <strong>of</strong> creditfor both inl<strong>and</strong> letter <strong>of</strong>credit <strong>and</strong> for importletter <strong>of</strong> credit is validfor a maximum usanceperiod <strong>of</strong> 180 days.3) The bank guaranteeis valid for a maximumperiod <strong>of</strong> 24 monthsinclusive <strong>of</strong> the claimperiod.4) The term loan is repayablein 20 equalquarterly installmentsafter a moratoriumperiod <strong>of</strong> 18 monthsfrom the date <strong>of</strong> first(7). <strong>and</strong> (8)disbursement5) The letter <strong>of</strong> credit(other than capitalgoods) is valid for amaximum usanceperiod <strong>of</strong> 180 days.First charge on parip<strong>as</strong>su b<strong>as</strong>is on thecurrent <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>of</strong> theCompany both in present<strong>and</strong> future (1).2) For Letter <strong>of</strong> Credit:• Goods procuredunder the letter <strong>of</strong>credit.• Assets on whichsecurity is createdfor availing thec<strong>as</strong>h credit facility.3) For Bank Guarantees:• All primary <strong>and</strong>collateral securityfurnished by theCompany inrespect <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>as</strong>hcredit facility.• Counter guarantee<strong>of</strong> the Company.4) For Term Loan:• First charge on parip<strong>as</strong>su b<strong>as</strong>is on theentire fixed <strong>as</strong>sets<strong>of</strong> the Company,both present <strong>and</strong>future.• Second charge onpari p<strong>as</strong>su b<strong>as</strong>is onthe current <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>of</strong>the Company, bothpresent <strong>and</strong> future.• Personal guarantees<strong>of</strong> Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta <strong>and</strong> Mr.Ajay Gupta (11) .5) For Letter <strong>of</strong> Credit(Inl<strong>and</strong>/Import) forpurch<strong>as</strong>e/import <strong>of</strong>capital goods:• Capital goodspurch<strong>as</strong>ed orimported under theletter <strong>of</strong> credit .• Assets on whichsecurity is createdfor availing theterm facility.178


(1) The Company is required to maintain margins on the following <strong>as</strong>sets:Raw material 25%Stock-in-process 25%Finished Goods & Packaging Material 25%Stores & Spares 25%Book Debts (Cover period 90 days) 40%(2) The letter <strong>of</strong> credit facility can be used by the Company to purch<strong>as</strong>e raw-material other than capital goods, packaging material, stores <strong>and</strong>spares required for day-to-day operations.(3) The goods procured by the Company under the letter <strong>of</strong> credit will have to be insured against all risks by the Company.(4) The Bank Guarantee will be used by the Company for the following purposes: (a) advance or security deposits in favour <strong>of</strong> sales tax,excise, custom authorities <strong>and</strong> other government department; (b) earnest money for tenders; (c) for any other activity <strong>of</strong> the Company.(5) The Company is required to maintain 100% c<strong>as</strong>h margin in c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> disputes liabilities.(*)Other terms <strong>and</strong> conditions applicable to the working capital facilities:(i) The Company will be given a time period <strong>of</strong> 90 days from the date <strong>of</strong> first disbursement for submission <strong>of</strong> no objection certificate /pari p<strong>as</strong>su letters from other Lenders. In c<strong>as</strong>e the required security interest in favour <strong>of</strong> the Lender is not created within the stipulated(ii)time period, a penal interest <strong>of</strong> 2% will be levied by the Lender.Pending completion <strong>of</strong> formalities in respect <strong>of</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> security interest in favour <strong>of</strong> the Lender, disbursal by the Lender will berestricted to 50% <strong>of</strong> the sanctioned limits.(iii) The Company is required to submit two sets <strong>of</strong> financial follow up reports, the first report within six weeks from the close <strong>of</strong> eachquarter to which it relates <strong>and</strong> the second report within eight weeks from the close <strong>of</strong> the half year to which it relates.(iv) Penal interest may be levied by the Lender in c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> breach by the Company <strong>of</strong> the terms <strong>and</strong> conditions contained in the sanctionletter.(v) The Company is not permitted to divert the working capital fund for long term purposes.(vi) The Company will maintain its net working capital position equal to or above the levels furnished in its projections for working capitalfinance.(6) The term loan will be utilized by the Company for implementing <strong>and</strong> operationalising Ph<strong>as</strong>e-I <strong>of</strong> the Railway Project (**) .(**) General terms <strong>and</strong> conditions applicable to the Railway Project Loan:(i)The Company is required to implement <strong>and</strong> operationalise Ph<strong>as</strong>e-I <strong>of</strong> the Railway Project within a total cost <strong>of</strong> Rs. 770.40 million.(ii) The cost <strong>of</strong> Ph<strong>as</strong>e- I <strong>of</strong> the Railway Project will have to be financed by means <strong>of</strong> equity capital or internal accruals amounting to Rs. 270.40million <strong>and</strong> debt component, that is, Railway Project Loan, <strong>of</strong> Rs.500.00 million. Any overrun in the project cost will be financed by theCompany using unsecured loan from the <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company. The funds availed by the Company from the Promoter will besubordinate to the credit facilities availed from the Lender.(iii) The l<strong>as</strong>t date <strong>of</strong> drawdown <strong>of</strong> the Railway Project Loan is December 31, 2010.(iv) At the time <strong>of</strong> each drawal, the Company will be required to furnish a certificate from a qualified chartered accountant giving details <strong>of</strong> costincurred in relation to the Railway Project <strong>and</strong> the means used to finance the same.(v)The Lender is entitled to withhold disbursement <strong>of</strong> the Railway Project Loan upon occurrence <strong>of</strong> any event that adversely affects theviability <strong>of</strong> the Railway Project or upon occurrence <strong>of</strong> an event <strong>of</strong> default under any agreement executed by the Company for the purpose <strong>of</strong>the Railway Project.(vi) The Company will be required to furnish quarterly reports, duly certified by chartered accountant, to the Lender detailing physical progress<strong>of</strong> the Railway Project including the schedule <strong>of</strong> project implementation, expenditure incurred <strong>and</strong> means <strong>of</strong> finance.(vii) The Lender h<strong>as</strong> stipulated certain financial covenants which are enumerated below:(a) The ratio <strong>of</strong> the total term debt to tangible net worth <strong>of</strong> the Company shall not exceed 2.00.(b) The Company will maintain a minimum fixed <strong>as</strong>set cover <strong>of</strong> 1.50(c) The Company shall maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.50The financial covenants are required to be reported <strong>as</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the monitoring report by the Company.(viii) The Company is required to finalise its selling arrangements in relation to the Railway Project to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Lender.(ix) The Lender h<strong>as</strong> reserved the right to appoint qualified accountants, technical experts, management consultants to examine the books <strong>of</strong>accounts, factories <strong>and</strong> operations <strong>of</strong> the Company. Any cost incurred in this regard will be borne by the Company.(x) The Lender is entitled to re-negotiate the terms <strong>and</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> this Railway Project Loan in c<strong>as</strong>e the Company enters into a loanarrangement on the terms which are more favourable to any other lender.(7) The term loan is valid for a period <strong>of</strong> six <strong>and</strong> half years including a moratorium period <strong>of</strong> 18 months from the date <strong>of</strong> first disbursement.179


(8) The Company shall have the option <strong>of</strong> the pre-payment <strong>of</strong> the term loan, that is, the Railway Project Loan, without any pre-payment penaltyon the specified dates at the end <strong>of</strong> 18 th , 24 th , 30 th <strong>and</strong> 36 th month from the date <strong>of</strong> first disbursement. The Company will be required to givetwo months prior notice to the Bank before exercising the pre-payment option. The pre-payment can be made out <strong>of</strong> the equity funds orinternal accruals.(9) The Company will be required to submit to the Lender on half yearly intervals the following information regarding the Ph<strong>as</strong>e I <strong>of</strong> theRailway Project:i) Physical progress; ii) Expenditure incurred; iii) Source <strong>of</strong> financing; <strong>and</strong> (iv) Adherence to project implementation schedule.(10) This letter <strong>of</strong> credit can be used to purch<strong>as</strong>e capital goods.(11) The Company h<strong>as</strong> agreed it will not make any payment to the guarantors, that is, Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta <strong>and</strong> Mr. Ajay Gupta in the form <strong>of</strong> acommission, brokerage, fees or in any other form, directly or indirectly in respect <strong>of</strong> the guarantees furnished by them under this loan document.(#)Other terms <strong>and</strong> conditions applicable to the term loans:(i) The full value <strong>of</strong> the <strong>as</strong>set charged with the Lender plus 10% <strong>of</strong> its value is required to be insured by the Company against all risks.(ii) The Company will be given a time period <strong>of</strong> 90 days from the date <strong>of</strong> first disbursement for submission <strong>of</strong> no objection certificate / parip<strong>as</strong>su letters from other Lenders. In c<strong>as</strong>e the required security interest in favour <strong>of</strong> the Lender is not created within the stipulated timeperiod, a penal interest <strong>of</strong> 2% will be levied by the Lender.(ii)Pending completion <strong>of</strong> formalities in respect <strong>of</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> security interest in favour <strong>of</strong> the Lender, disbursal by the Lender will berestricted to 50% <strong>of</strong> the sanctioned limits.(^) Other Significant provisions <strong>of</strong> the sanction letter applicable to both the term loan <strong>and</strong> working capital loan:i) The loan availed by the company will be used for the purpose for which it h<strong>as</strong> been sanctioned by the Lender.ii) The Company will not be permitted to pay any commission, brokerage or fees in any form to the guarantors, directly or indirectly.(~) Some <strong>of</strong> the important actions for which the Company will require prior written permission <strong>of</strong> the Lender are <strong>as</strong> under:a) Entry into borrowing arrangement either secured or unsecured with any other Lender, financial institution, company;b) Creation <strong>of</strong> any further charge on the fixed <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>of</strong> the Company;c) Undertaking any expansion or fresh projects or acquire any fixed <strong>as</strong>sets other than in normal course <strong>of</strong> business;d) Formulation <strong>of</strong> any scheme <strong>of</strong> amalgamation or reconstruction;e) Declaration <strong>of</strong> dividends for any year except out <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its relating to that year after making all due <strong>and</strong> necessary provisions <strong>and</strong> providedfurther that no default had occurred in any repayment obligations;f) Change in the management set-up;(^^)The Company is yet to create security on the <strong>as</strong>sets mentioned above. For further details in respect <strong>of</strong> the risk regarding failure to createsecurity in favour <strong>of</strong> the Lender, refer to section on “Risk Factors” beginning on page XIII <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.(ii) Term loan granted in 2006Loan DocumentationTotal Amount/Lines <strong>of</strong> CreditSanctionedAmount availed<strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> March 31,2010<strong>Interest</strong> RateRepaymentScheduleSecurityCreated/GuaranteesProvideda) Sanction Letter datedFebruary 23, 2006 bearingreference numberBB/RAC/HYD/BLAP9/05—(4) <strong>and</strong> (5)06b) Loan agreement datedFebruary 27, 2006 (7)Term Loan <strong>of</strong> Rs.8.1 millionRs 4.796 million9.50% p.a.compounded atmonthly rests<strong>and</strong> (1b)(1) (1a)84 equated monthly 1. Equitable mortgage <strong>of</strong>installments <strong>of</strong> Rs. l<strong>and</strong> adme<strong>as</strong>uring132,387 (2) , (6) 18,062 sq. ft. bearingplot number 2 (new), 14(old), part <strong>of</strong> bunglowNo. 37D, Block 36,situated at Civil LinesWard, Civil Station,Pachpedi, Jabalpur (3).2. Personal guarantee<strong>of</strong> the following:a) Mr. IshwarCh<strong>and</strong>rab) Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Guptac) Mrs. Urmil Guptad) Mr. Ajay Guptae) Mrs. Rekha Gupta3. Personal guarantee <strong>of</strong>Ms. Angoori Devi.(1) Any irregularity on account <strong>of</strong> non-payment <strong>of</strong> interest/charges/installments will attract a penal interest at the rate <strong>of</strong> 2% per annumover <strong>and</strong> above the agreed interest rate.180


(1a) The Lender h<strong>as</strong> the right to change the rate <strong>of</strong> interest depending on the changes in the prime lending rate <strong>of</strong> the Lender. The Companywill be bound to pay this interest rate on the borrowed amount.(1b) Any default by the Company in respect <strong>of</strong> its payment obligations under the loan agreement will attract penal charges <strong>as</strong> may bedetermined by the Lender.(2) Pre-payment <strong>of</strong> the loan will attract pre-payment charges at the rate <strong>of</strong> 2% <strong>of</strong> the outst<strong>and</strong>ing loan amount.(3) The Company h<strong>as</strong> given an undertaking that it will not <strong>as</strong>sign the le<strong>as</strong>e rentals arising out <strong>of</strong> the property charged to Axis Bank toanyone during the currency <strong>of</strong> this loan.(4) Some <strong>of</strong> the important actions for which the Company will require prior written permission <strong>of</strong> the Lender are <strong>as</strong> under:(a) Effect any major change in the capital structure;(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)Formulate any scheme <strong>of</strong> amalgamation or reconstruction;.Enter into borrowing arrangement either secured or unsecured with any other bank or financial institution, Company orotherwise;Make any dr<strong>as</strong>tic change in its management or substantial change in the constitution <strong>of</strong> the Company;Invest by way <strong>of</strong> share capital in or lend or advance funds to or place deposits with any other concern;Undertake guarantee obligations on behalf <strong>of</strong> another firm/concern/company or subsidiary;Creation <strong>of</strong> any further charge on the security furnished by the Company to the Lender.(5) The Company h<strong>as</strong> agreed that it will keep the Lender informed <strong>of</strong> happening <strong>of</strong> any event, likely to have a substantial effect ontheir production, sales, pr<strong>of</strong>its etc. <strong>and</strong> the remedial steps proposed to be taken by it.(6) The Lender h<strong>as</strong> the right to revise/reschedule the repayment terms <strong>of</strong> the installments or any other amount <strong>and</strong> the periodicity <strong>of</strong>compounding interest outst<strong>and</strong>ing under the loan. The Company will be bound to make all repayment in accordance with theterms <strong>of</strong> the revised repayment schedule.(7) Under the loan agreement dated February 27, 2006, the Lender h<strong>as</strong> reserved the right to procure additional security from theCompany.Unsecured LoansAs at March 31, 2010, our outst<strong>and</strong>ing unsecured loans are Rs. 3.01 million. We have availed the unsecured loanfrom Commercial Automobiles Private Limited, one <strong>of</strong> our Group Companies. For risks regarding unsecured loans,refer to the section “Risk Factors” beginning on page XIII <strong>of</strong> the Prospectus.For further details refer to section “Financial Statements” beginning on page F-1 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.Other Credit FacilitiesThe Company h<strong>as</strong> entered into a tri-partite agreement with HDFC Bank Limited (“HDFC”) <strong>and</strong> Tata MotorsLimited (“TML”) dated January 27, 2009 under which HDFC h<strong>as</strong> agreed to discount the bills <strong>of</strong> exchange drawn bythe Company in relation to the products that are being supplied by the Company to TML from time to time. TheCompany h<strong>as</strong> further agreed to indemnify HDFC for the losses that HDFC may suffer <strong>as</strong> a result <strong>of</strong> this billdiscounting arrangement.181


C<strong>as</strong>es By <strong>and</strong> Against the CompanySECTION VI: LEGAL AND OTHER INFORMATIONOUTSTANDING LITIGATION AND MATERIAL DEVELOPMENTS<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> below there is no (i) litigation, including proceedings relating to tax liabilities, proceedings underthe Companies Act <strong>and</strong> arbitrations, labour disputes, by or against the Company, or against any other companywhose outcome could have a material <strong>and</strong> adverse effect on our results <strong>of</strong> operations or financial position; or (ii)pending criminal proceedings or proceedings regarding economic, statutory or other civil <strong>of</strong>fences by or against theCompany:C<strong>as</strong>es Against the CompanyCriminal MattersS.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/ArbitrationPanel1. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 4/92Union <strong>of</strong> Indiavs.Company <strong>and</strong>Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.1992 Special ChiefJudicialMagistrateKanpur NagarIncome Tax MattersS.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/Arbitration1. CIT (A)-II/1009/ACIT-VI/2004-05/450Companyvs.AOThe AssistantCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Income Tax,Kanpur2. Appeal numbernot yet allottedCompanyDecember21, 2004January 17,2008Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eProsecution<strong>of</strong> accusedNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eAmount underConsiderationRs.Rs. 230,724.50Amount underConsiderationRs.PanelCIT (A) Kanpur Civil suit Rs. 580,905for the AY2002-03.CIT (A) Kanpur Civil suit Rs. 354,515for the AY2003-04.Brief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>eCompany failed to deposit taxdeducted at source by theCompany within theprescribed period whilepaying interest to certain thirdparties for AY 1987-1988. Onthis ground the Income TaxAuthorities have broughtproceedings against theCompany <strong>and</strong> Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta in his capacity <strong>as</strong>director <strong>of</strong> the Company.Brief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>eDispute regardingdisallowance <strong>of</strong> certaincommission paid <strong>and</strong>adjustment <strong>of</strong> purch<strong>as</strong>eprice <strong>of</strong> the goods boughtfrom a sister concern on theb<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> allegedly lowermarket value.Both the Company <strong>and</strong> theIncome Tax departmentwent into appeal to theITAT against the orderp<strong>as</strong>sed by the CIT (A).Matter h<strong>as</strong> been rem<strong>and</strong>edback to CIT (A) with adirection to afford theCompany a re<strong>as</strong>onableopportunity to be heard.Dispute regarding deduction<strong>of</strong> Rs. 756,358 claimed byCompany under Section80IA <strong>of</strong> the Income TaxStatusPending.*StatusPending.*TheCompanyh<strong>as</strong>deposited <strong>as</strong>um <strong>of</strong> Rs.580,905Pending.*182


S.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/ArbitrationPanelvs.AOThe DeputyCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Income Tax,Kanpur3. Appeal numbernot yet allottedCompanyvs.AOThe AssistantCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Income Tax,KanpurNovember30, 2006Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eAmount underConsiderationRs.CIT (A) Kanpur Civil suit Rs. 2,199,069for the AY2004-05.Brief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>eAct, 1961 in relation to theAY 2003-04 beingdisallowed by AO <strong>as</strong> theCompany failed to furnishthe audit report in Form10CCB <strong>as</strong> require underIncome Tax Rules, 1962.Dispute regarding thefollowing expenses beingdisallowed for AY 2004-05:(i) Rs. 2,315,152 <strong>and</strong> Rs.689,568 paid <strong>as</strong> commissionby the Company. AO claimsthat the services claimed tobe availed by the Companycould not be substantiatedwith any documentaryevidence.(ii) Rs. 1,686,400 paid bythe Company in respect <strong>of</strong>sales tax paid by theCompany against defermentscheme <strong>and</strong> interest on salestax.(iii) Legal expenses forpurch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> stamp paper <strong>and</strong>valuation fee in respect <strong>of</strong>stock yard amounting to Rs.224,569. The AO held thesame to be capitalexpenditure.StatusPending.*4. Appeal numbernot yet allotted.Companyvs.AOThe AdditionalCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Income Tax,Kanpur5. Appeal numbernot yet allottedCompanyvs.AOThe DeputyCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Income Tax,KanpurDecember27, 2008December31, 2009CIT (A) Kanpur Civil suit Rs. 760,081for the AY2006-07CIT (A), Kanpur Civil suit Rs. 3,146,823for AY 2007-08Dispute regarding AOdisallowing commission <strong>of</strong>Rs. 1,672,734 paid by theCompany for certainservices provided to it interms <strong>of</strong> agreements enteredinto with certain vendors.The Company h<strong>as</strong> preferredan appeal against the aboveorder before the CIT (A) onthe ground that commissionpaid w<strong>as</strong> against actualservices rendered by thevendor.(i) Dispute regarding AOdisallowing long termcapital loss claimed by theCompany <strong>of</strong> Rs. 332,613 inrespect <strong>of</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> shares <strong>of</strong>Shivam Motors PrivateLimited. (ii) Disputeregarding AO disallowingcarry forward <strong>and</strong> set-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong>unabsorbed capital lossbrought forward from AY2000-01.(iii) Dispute regarding AOdisallowing commission <strong>of</strong>Rs. 475,585 paid to AnimaPending.*Pending.*183


S.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/ArbitrationPanel* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eAmount underConsiderationRs.Brief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>eEnterprise for actualservices rendered.The Company h<strong>as</strong> made aclaim for refund <strong>of</strong> incometaxamounting to Rs.3,146,823; AO h<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sesseda refund <strong>of</strong> only Rs.786,570.StatusExcise MattersS.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/Arbitration1. 86/COMMR/CEX/JBP/2008CEC, Bhopalvs.Company2. 52/COMMR/CEX/JBP/2008CEC, Bhopalvs.CompanyAugust 4,2008April 29,2008PanelCommissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTaxCommissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTaxNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCivil suitCivil suitAmount underConsiderationRs.Excise Duty(i)Rs. 21,896,492(ii)Rs. 3,979,719for the periodDecember 2006to October 2007<strong>Interest</strong>(i)Rs. 1,160,975(ii)Rs. 270,307Plus Penalty <strong>of</strong>Rs. 25,000Excise DutyRs. 44,172,077plus interest <strong>and</strong>penaltyBrief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>e(i) Dispute regarding CECclaiming refund <strong>of</strong> CENVATcredit taken by Company atthe time <strong>of</strong> initial purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis on which it paidexcise duty but failed torefund such credit when itremoved such ch<strong>as</strong>sis toanother unit withoutmanufacturing the body onsuch ch<strong>as</strong>sis, which is a prerequisitefor claimingCENVAT credit.(ii) Dispute seeking payment<strong>of</strong> differential excise duty byCompany <strong>as</strong> it under paidsince it computed liability onthe b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> bodybuilt <strong>as</strong> against therequirement to pay duty onthe value <strong>of</strong> the entirevehicle.CEC claims that Companyunder paid excise duty onbody built by it on job workb<strong>as</strong>is on ch<strong>as</strong>sis supplied byTata Motors Limited since itcomputed the ‘transactionvalue’ on value <strong>of</strong> body <strong>and</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis where<strong>as</strong> the‘transaction value’ shouldhave been computed at thevalue at which motorvehicles are sold by TataMotors Limited in themarket.Status(i) Companyh<strong>as</strong> agreed toits liability topay differentialduty <strong>and</strong> h<strong>as</strong>,in November2007, paid aduty <strong>of</strong> Rs.21,896,492<strong>and</strong>3,979,719(ii) Companycontestingdem<strong>and</strong> forpayment <strong>of</strong>interest <strong>and</strong>levy <strong>of</strong>penalty.Pending.*Matter h<strong>as</strong>been decidedagainst theCompany. TheCompany ispreferring anappeal to theCustoms,Excise <strong>and</strong>Service TaxAppellateTribunal(“CESTAT”).3. 133/COMMR/CEX/JBP/2008CEC, Bhopalvs.CompanyDecember3, 2008Commissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTaxCivil suitExcise DutyRs. 25,876,211plus interest <strong>and</strong>penaltyCEC claims that theCompany h<strong>as</strong> wrongfullyclaimed CENVAT creditsince such credit is beingclaimed on the strength <strong>of</strong>an earlier willfulsuppression <strong>of</strong> facts by theCompany.Chargesagainst theCompany havebeen dropped.184


S.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/ArbitrationPanel4. 58/COMMR/CEX/JBP/09CEC, Bhopalvs.Company5. 109/COMMR/CEX/JBP/09CEC, Bhopalvs.Company6. 2/ADC/CEX/JBP/2008AdditionalBhopalvs.CompanyCEC,7. 5/COMMR/CEX/JBP/2008CEC, Bhopalvs.Company8. 134/COMMR/CEX/JBP/2008 lCEC, Bhopalvs. Company9. 59/COMMR/CEX/JBP/2009CEC, Bhopalvs.May 6,2009November6, 2009January 3,2008January 9,2008December3, 2008May 6,2009Commissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTaxCommissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTaxCustoms,ExciseServiceAppellateTribunal<strong>and</strong>TaxCustoms,Excise <strong>and</strong>Service TaxAppellateTribunalCommissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTaxCommissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTaxNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCivil suitCivil suitCivil suitCivil suitCivil suitCivil suitAmount underConsiderationRs.Excise DutyRs. 21,604,827for the periodApril 2008 toSeptember 2008plus interest <strong>and</strong>penaltyExcise DutyRs. 3,151,583for the periodOctober 2008 toMarch 2009 plusinterest <strong>and</strong>penaltyExcise DutyRs. 3,979,719<strong>Interest</strong>Rs. 267,476PenaltyRs. 250,000Excise DutyRs. 21,896,492for the periodDecember 2006to October 2007<strong>Interest</strong>Rs. 1,153,238PenaltyRs. 1,153,238Excise DutyRs. 25,876,211plus interest <strong>and</strong>penaltyExcise DutyRs. 17,607,465for the periodApril 2008 toSeptember 2008Brief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>eCEC claims that Companyunder paid excise duty onbody built by it on job workb<strong>as</strong>is on ch<strong>as</strong>sis supplied byTata Motors Limited since itcomputed the ‘transactionvalue’ on value <strong>of</strong> body <strong>and</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis where<strong>as</strong> the valueshould have been computedat the value at which motorvehicles are sold by TataMotors Limited in themarket.CEC claims that Companyunder paid excise duty onbody built by it on job workb<strong>as</strong>is on ch<strong>as</strong>sis supplied byTata Motors Limited since itcomputed the ‘transactionvalue’ on value <strong>of</strong> body <strong>and</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis where<strong>as</strong> the valueshould have been computedat the value at which motorvehicles are sold by TataMotors Limited in themarket.Dispute regarding CECclaiming refund <strong>of</strong> CENVATcredit taken by Companyupon initial purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis on which it paidexcise duty but failed torefund the credit when itremoved such ch<strong>as</strong>sis toanother unit withoutmanufacturing the body onsuch ch<strong>as</strong>sis, which is a prerequisitefor claimingCENVAT credit.Dispute regarding CECclaiming refund <strong>of</strong> CENVATcredit taken by Companyupon initial purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis on which it paidexcise duty but failed torefund the credit when itremoved such ch<strong>as</strong>sis toanother unit withoutmanufacturing the body onsuch ch<strong>as</strong>sis, which is a prerequisitefor claimingCENVAT credit.CEC claims that theCompany h<strong>as</strong> wrongfullyclaimed CENVAT creditsince such credit is beingclaimed on the strength <strong>of</strong>an earlier willfulsuppression <strong>of</strong> facts by theCompany.CEC claims that Companyunder paid excise duty onbody built by it on job workb<strong>as</strong>is on ch<strong>as</strong>sis supplied byTata Motors Limited since itStatusPending.*Matter h<strong>as</strong>been decidedagainst theCompany. TheCompany ispreferring anappeal to theCESTAT.Pending.*Matter h<strong>as</strong>been decidedagainst theCompany. TheCompany ispreferring anappeal to theCESTAT.Pending.*Company’ssecond appealbefore theCESTAT ispending.Company’ssecond appealbefore theCESTAT iscurrentlypending wherethedepartment’sorder imposingthe disputedamounts h<strong>as</strong>been stayed onApril 6, 2009.Chargesagainst theCompany havebeen dropped.Pending.*Matter h<strong>as</strong>been decidedagainst the185


S.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/ArbitrationPanelCompany10. 108/COMMR/CEX/JBP/2009CEC, Bhopalvs.Company11. V(87)/15-58/Adj-1/2010/5636CEC, Bhopalvs.Company12. V(87)/15-58/Adj-1/2010/5646CEC, Bhopalvs.CompanyNovember6, 2009May, 6 2010May 6, 2010* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.Commissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTaxCommissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTax, 48,AdministrativeArea, AreraHills,HoshangabadRoad, BhopalCommissioner<strong>of</strong> Customs,Central Excise<strong>and</strong> ServiceTax, 48,AdministrativeArea, AreraHills,HoshangabadRoad, BhopalNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCivil suitCivil suitCivil suitAmount underConsiderationRs.plus interest <strong>and</strong>penaltyExcise DutyRs. 7,448,821for the periodOctober 2008 toMarch 2009 plusinterest <strong>and</strong>penaltyExcise DutyRs. 72,65,810 plus<strong>and</strong> penaltyExcise DutyRs. 1,41,06,718plus interest <strong>and</strong>penaltyBrief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>ecomputed the ‘transactionvalue’ on value <strong>of</strong> body <strong>and</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis where<strong>as</strong> the valueshould have been computedat the value at which motorvehicles are sold by TataMotors Limited in themarket.CEC claims that Companyunder paid excise duty onbody built by it on job workb<strong>as</strong>is on ch<strong>as</strong>sis supplied byTata Motors Limited since itcomputed the ‘transactionvalue’ on value <strong>of</strong> body <strong>and</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis where<strong>as</strong> the valueshould have been computedat the value at which motorvehicles are sold by TataMotors Limited in themarket.CEC claims that Companyunder paid excise duty on bodybuilt by it on job work b<strong>as</strong>is onch<strong>as</strong>sis supplied by TataMotors Limited since itcomputed the ‘transactionvalue’ on value <strong>of</strong> body <strong>and</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis where<strong>as</strong> the ‘transactionvalue’ should have beencomputed at the value at whichmotor vehicles are sold by TataMotors Limited in the market.CEC claims that Companyunder paid excise duty on bodybuilt by it on job work b<strong>as</strong>is onch<strong>as</strong>sis supplied by TataMotors Limited since itcomputed the ‘transactionvalue’ on value <strong>of</strong> body <strong>and</strong>ch<strong>as</strong>sis where<strong>as</strong> the valueshould have been computed atthe value at which motorvehicles are sold by TataMotors Limited in the market.StatusCompany. TheCompany ispreferring anappeal to theCESTAT.Pending.*Matter h<strong>as</strong>been decidedagainst theCompany. TheCompany ispreferring anappeal to theCESTAT.Pending.*Pending.*Matter h<strong>as</strong> beendecided againstthe Company.The Companyis preferring anappeal to theCESTAT.Sales Tax <strong>and</strong> VAT MattersS.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/ArbitrationPanel1. 10/06 (rem<strong>and</strong>)-CentralAssistantJabalpurvs.CompanyCCT,November 2,20072. 534/06-Local December10, 2007AssistantCommissioner,Commercial Tax,JabalpurDeputyCommissioner,Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCivil suitCivil suitAmount underConsiderationRs.Sales TaxRs. 248,788<strong>Interest</strong> on SalesTaxBrief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>eCompany is claiming refund <strong>of</strong> Rs.248,788 since it earlier depositedsales tax <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1,053,639 with theauthorities while its liability w<strong>as</strong>eventually <strong>as</strong>sessed at only Rs.802,551.Dispute regarding the salesturnover reported by the CompanyStatusRefund receivedThe Refund willbe adjustedagainst futureliability. TheCompany is yetto receive theorder <strong>of</strong> theadjudicatingauthorityAppellateauthority h<strong>as</strong> set186


S.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/ArbitrationPanelDeputyJabalpurvs.Company3. 548/06-LocalDeputyJabalpurvs.Company4. 224/07/LocalCCT,CCT,Commissioner(Appeals),Commercial Tax,Jabalpurvs.Company5. 226/07/CentralCommissioner(Appeals),CommercialJabalpurvs.Company6. 342/08/LocalTax,Commissioner(Appeals),Commercial Tax,Jabalpurvs.Company7. 344/08/CentralCommissioner(Appeals),CommercialJabalpurvs.CompanyTax,December12, 2007May 14,2008May 14,2008May 7, 2009May 7, 2009* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.Miscellaneous MattersNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eAmount underConsiderationRs.Commercial Tax,Jabalpur Rs. 19,967DeputyCommissioner,Commercial Tax,JabalpurCommissioner(Appeals),Commercial Tax,JabalpurCommissioner(Appeals),Commercial Tax,JabalpurCommissioner(Appeals),Commercial Tax,JabalpurCommissioner(Appeals),Commercial Tax,JabalpurCivil suitCivil suit<strong>Interest</strong> on SalesTaxRs. 364,977Sales TaxRs. 901,883Brief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>ebeing enhanced by the <strong>as</strong>sessingauthority by Rs. 3,775,370. The<strong>as</strong>sessing authority also leviedinterest <strong>of</strong> Rs. 19,967.Dispute regarding Company notbeing allowed to claimconcessional rate <strong>of</strong> sales tax dueto delay by it in submission <strong>of</strong>forms for claiming concessionalrate <strong>of</strong> sales tax.Dispute regarding whether theCompany is eligible for anexemption from payment <strong>of</strong>surcharge on the sales tax paid byit when it built a body on thech<strong>as</strong>sis which were sold to theVehicle Factory.Civil suit Not <strong>as</strong>certained. The Company failed to file FormC for claiming concessional rate<strong>of</strong> sales <strong>and</strong> therefore theauthorities are claimingdifferential amount <strong>of</strong> tax not paidby the Company.Civil suitSales TaxRs. 1,256,779The Company h<strong>as</strong> sought for anextension <strong>of</strong> time for filing theforms for claiming concessionalrate <strong>of</strong> sales tax.Dispute regarding whether theCompany is eligible for anexemption from payment <strong>of</strong>surcharge on the sales tax paid byit when it built a body on thech<strong>as</strong>sis which were sold to theVehicle Factory.Civil suit Rs. 47,700 The Company failed to file FormC for claiming concessional rate<strong>of</strong> sales <strong>and</strong> therefore theauthorities are claimingdifferential amount <strong>of</strong> tax not paidby the Company.The Company h<strong>as</strong> sought for anextension <strong>of</strong> time for filing theforms for claiming concessionalrate <strong>of</strong> sales tax.Status<strong>as</strong>ideenhancement <strong>of</strong>sales turnover bythe <strong>as</strong>sessingauthority;however, it h<strong>as</strong>upheld the levy<strong>of</strong> interest on theCompany.Company h<strong>as</strong>been allowed toclaimconcessional rate<strong>of</strong> sales tax uponsubmission <strong>of</strong>forms forclaimingconcessional rate<strong>of</strong> sales taxsubject topayment <strong>of</strong>interest <strong>of</strong> Rs.364,977.Company’ssecond appeal inthis matterbefore theCommissioner(Appeals) h<strong>as</strong>been dismissed.Company’ssecond appeal inthis matterbefore theCommissioner(Appeals) h<strong>as</strong>been dismissed.Company’ssecond appeal inthis matterbefore theCommissioner(Appeals) h<strong>as</strong>been dismissed.Company’ssecond appeal inthis matterbefore theCommissioner(Appeals) h<strong>as</strong>been dismissed.1. Mr. Bablu Mehtavs. CompanyNotmentionedMotor VehicleAccidentClaims TribunalMotorAccidentClaimRs. 2,727,042Application filed for claimingcompensation due to lossessuffered <strong>as</strong> a result <strong>of</strong>Pending.*187


* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.accident caused by allegednegligent driving <strong>of</strong> a vehicleowned by Tata MotorsLimited <strong>and</strong> the Company.The Company <strong>and</strong> Mr. Ajay Gupta received a notice dated May 13, 2010 from the Factories Inspector stating thatpursuant to an inspection conducted at the Company’s M<strong>and</strong>la Factory on February 26, 2010, the Company w<strong>as</strong>found to be in violation <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Factories Act, 1948. The inspection w<strong>as</strong> undertaken <strong>as</strong> an accidentoccurred at the Company’s M<strong>and</strong>la Factory while a tipper truck w<strong>as</strong> being reversed within the factory premises.Accordingly, a complaint h<strong>as</strong> been filed under Section 105 <strong>of</strong> the Factories Act, 1948 before the Chief JudicialMagistrate, M<strong>and</strong>la on May 24, 2010. On the said date, the Company h<strong>as</strong> been presented with a letter setting out theallegations against the Company. The letter alleges that the accident involving the tipper truck took place <strong>as</strong> thedriver <strong>of</strong> the vehicle could not see who is st<strong>and</strong>ing behind the vehicle while reversing the tipper truck which w<strong>as</strong> aresult <strong>of</strong> the Company failing to effectively supervise front <strong>and</strong> reverse driving <strong>of</strong> such tipper trucks.C<strong>as</strong>es by the CompanyS.No.Cause Title Dated Name &Address <strong>of</strong> theCourt/ArbitrationPanel1994 High Court <strong>of</strong>Commissioner <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshIncome Tax,Kanpur1. The DeputyMaharaj SinghBhatiaCivil (Secondappeal filed inyear 1994)2. Companyvs.M/s StainalEngineeringWorks.(Filed in 2007)3. Special LeavePetition No. 5408<strong>of</strong> 2009October 4,2007Companyvs.State <strong>of</strong> MadhyaPradesh & Ors.* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.Court <strong>of</strong> JudicialMagistrate, FirstCl<strong>as</strong>s, JabalpurAmountunderConsiderationRs.Rs. 18,000(Amountpaid)Rs.1,689,300Brief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>eThe appellants have filed this appeal against thedecree <strong>of</strong> the lower court granting relief to therespondent for an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 18,000 towardsclaims made during warranty period <strong>of</strong> vehicle.Appellants claim that the respondents havebreached terms <strong>of</strong> the warranty <strong>and</strong> hence notentitled to any relief.Dispute regarding agreement with Defendant formanufacture <strong>of</strong> water bowsers shells for theCompany. Amongst other allegations, Companyclaims that the Defendant h<strong>as</strong> dishonestlymisappropriated Company’s property, <strong>and</strong>refuses to either return it, or reimburse Companyfor the value <strong>of</strong> the same. Complaint is filedunder Sections 403, 405, 415 <strong>and</strong> 420 <strong>of</strong> theIndian Penal Code, 1860 read along with Section200 <strong>of</strong> the Code <strong>of</strong> Criminal Procedure 1973.2009 Supreme Court Nil Petition challenging the constitutional validity <strong>of</strong>the M. P. Entry Tax Act, 1976 w<strong>as</strong> filed by theCompany before the High Court <strong>of</strong> MadhyaPradesh. The High Court dismissed the petitionfiled by the Company, hence this appeal.StatusPending.*Pending.*Pending.*Insurance ClaimThe Company h<strong>as</strong> filed a claim against Oriental Insurance Company Limited for damage to building shed <strong>and</strong>machinery <strong>of</strong> Richhai Factory II on 23 June, 2010 due to heavy wind/storm <strong>and</strong> rainfall. No specific amount h<strong>as</strong>been claimed. Company h<strong>as</strong> requested insurer to register the claim <strong>and</strong> undertake a spot survey to <strong>as</strong>certain thelosses.Provident Fund Refund188


In the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company had paid Rs. 5.8 million towards dem<strong>and</strong> raised by the AssistantProvident Fund Commissioner (APFC), Jabalpur for alleged violation <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> Employees ProvidentFund Scheme, 1952. The Company had filed an appeal against the order <strong>and</strong> during the year ended March 31, 2008the Company received an order from the tribunal qu<strong>as</strong>hing the above order p<strong>as</strong>sed by APFC <strong>and</strong> directing it torefund the amount deposited by the Company. The Company is yet to receive this refund amount. The Company h<strong>as</strong>been regularly following up with the provident fund department in this regard.Pending investigations/claims/notices against <strong>Directors</strong>/Company1. The Company h<strong>as</strong> received a notice bearing number 1313/JDI/I/2007 dated March 18, 2008 from the Office <strong>of</strong>Regional Director, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Corporate Affairs, Government <strong>of</strong> India, alleging violation <strong>of</strong> various provisions<strong>of</strong> the Companies Act by the Company <strong>and</strong> its <strong>Directors</strong>. This notice h<strong>as</strong> been received by the Companypursuant to an inspection <strong>of</strong> its statutory records carried out at its registered <strong>of</strong>fice.The alleged violations are <strong>as</strong> follows:(a) Certain pages <strong>of</strong> the minutes <strong>of</strong> the meeting <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>and</strong> shareholders <strong>of</strong> the Company held during the year2007 were not consecutively numbered <strong>and</strong> the minutes book w<strong>as</strong> not bound <strong>as</strong> is required under Section 193 <strong>of</strong>the Companies Act <strong>and</strong> is punishable with a fine <strong>of</strong> up to Rs. 500 on the Company <strong>and</strong> every <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> theCompany who is in default.(b) The balance sheets <strong>of</strong> the Company for the periods ending March 31, 1993, March 31, 1994, March 31, 1998,March 31, 1999, March 31, 2000 <strong>and</strong> March 31, 2001 did not present a true <strong>and</strong> fair view <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong> affairs<strong>of</strong> the Company since these balance sheets do not have a foot note indicating the contingent liability <strong>of</strong> theCompany undertaken by it by furnishing corporate guarantees towards certain debts incurred by Shivam Motors(which is a Group Company), Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobiles (which is a firm belonging to the Promoter Group) <strong>and</strong>Commercial Motors Finance Limited, resulting in a violation <strong>of</strong> Section 211 <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act which ispunishable with imprisonment for a term <strong>of</strong> up to 6 months or with fine <strong>of</strong> up to Rs. 10,000 or both on themanaging director or manager <strong>and</strong> all <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>and</strong> employees <strong>of</strong> the Company.(c) The Company h<strong>as</strong> not filed certain statutory forms pursuant to confirmation <strong>of</strong> appointment <strong>of</strong> certain directorswho were appointed during the years 2005, 2006 <strong>and</strong> 2007 at shareholder meetings, <strong>as</strong> is required pursuant toSection 303 <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act which is punishable with fine <strong>of</strong> up to Rs. 500 for every day during whichdefault continues on the Company <strong>and</strong> every <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the Company who is in default.(d) The remuneration paid by Company to M/s Mittal Gupta & Company who were auditors <strong>of</strong> the Company forthe Financial Year 2005-2006 w<strong>as</strong> not approved by the Board or the shareholders, <strong>as</strong> is necessary under Section224(8) <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act which is punishable with fine <strong>of</strong> up to Rs. 5,000 on the Company <strong>and</strong> every<strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the Company who is in default <strong>and</strong> in c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a continuing <strong>of</strong>fence, a further fine <strong>of</strong> up to Rs. 500 forevery day (other than the first day) during which default continues.(e) Certain directors <strong>of</strong> the Company failed to provide a notice <strong>of</strong> disclosure <strong>of</strong> their interest for the Financial Years2005-2006 <strong>and</strong> 2006-2007, <strong>as</strong> prescribed by Section 299 <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act which is punishable with fine <strong>of</strong>up to Rs. 50,000 on every director who is in default.(f)The Company h<strong>as</strong> failed to appoint a company secretary after the prescribed levels <strong>of</strong> paid-up capital werecrossed by the Company, <strong>as</strong> is required under Section 383A <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act which is punishable with fine<strong>of</strong> up to Rs. 500 on the Company <strong>and</strong> every <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the Company who is in default for every day duringwhich default continues.(g) Certain contracts were entered into by the Company with Commercial Body Builders, Commercial Auto Centre,Kail<strong>as</strong>h Automobiles, Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders, Tirupati Traders <strong>and</strong> Tirupati Equipments Private Limited, being entitiesin which certain <strong>of</strong> the directors were interested, without complying with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Section 297 <strong>of</strong> theCompanies Act which makes the contracts voidable.189


(h) The notice also <strong>as</strong>ks for details to be provided regarding allegations <strong>of</strong> fraud <strong>and</strong> irregularities in the bidding<strong>and</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> certain l<strong>and</strong> in collusion with a lower court (not identified in the notice) by the “J. N. Group <strong>of</strong>Companies” (also not identified in the notice). The notice also mentions certain legal proceedings in this regard.The Company h<strong>as</strong> filed a reply dated June 25, 2008 to this notice dated March 18, 2008. Subsequently, the Company<strong>and</strong> Mr. Ajay Gupta have received three notices from the Registrar <strong>of</strong> Companies, Kanpur dated May 14, 2009<strong>as</strong>king the Company to show cause why prosecution should not be launched against the Company for a violation <strong>of</strong>Section 193 (pages <strong>of</strong> minutes book not consecutively numbered), 224(8) (non-compliance <strong>of</strong> procedure towardspayment <strong>of</strong> remuneration to auditors) <strong>and</strong> 303(2) (non filing <strong>of</strong> statutory form pursuant to confirmation <strong>of</strong>appointment <strong>of</strong> director) <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act. The Company h<strong>as</strong> filed three separate applications for compoundingthe abovementioned violations under the Companies Act which are currently pending before the Registrar <strong>of</strong>Companies, Kanpur. Pursuant to the order <strong>of</strong> the Company Law Board, New Delhi Bench, New Delhi, datedSeptember 30, 2010 the <strong>of</strong>fence in relation to Section 303(2) have been compounded <strong>and</strong> the compounding fee <strong>of</strong>Rs. 18,000 h<strong>as</strong> been paid.There are no adverse findings against the Company <strong>as</strong> regards compliance with securities laws.2. The Company h<strong>as</strong> received a letter bearing number C.No. V(12)/CEP/JSR/09 dated April 22, 2010 fromthe Office <strong>of</strong> Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Central Excise <strong>and</strong> Service Tax, Jamshedpur enquiring whether the duty onthe goods being supplied to Tata Motors Limited by the Company is being paid in accordance with Rule10A <strong>of</strong> the Central Excise Valuation (Determination <strong>of</strong> Price <strong>of</strong> Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000. Under thisletter the enquiring authority h<strong>as</strong> requisitioned for certain supportive documents. The Company h<strong>as</strong> filed areply to this letter on May 12, 2010 along with the relevant documents. The matter h<strong>as</strong> been pendingwithout any further action by the Office <strong>of</strong> Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Central Excise <strong>and</strong> Service Tax, Jamshedpursince then.<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> below, no penalties have been imposed on the Company by any governmental authority or court:1. A penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs. 39,000 h<strong>as</strong> been imposed by the Court <strong>of</strong> Chief Judicial Magistrate, M<strong>and</strong>la, Madhya Pradeshagainst Ms. Rekha Gupta, former Director <strong>of</strong> the Company, <strong>as</strong> occupier under the Factories Act <strong>and</strong> Mr.Santosh Aggarwal <strong>as</strong> personnel manager <strong>of</strong> the Company, due to a contravention by the Company <strong>of</strong>provisions for safety <strong>and</strong> welfare <strong>of</strong> workmen under the Factories Act, 1948 <strong>and</strong> the Madhya PradeshFactories Rules, 1962 leading to death <strong>of</strong> a workman at the M<strong>and</strong>la Factory premises.2. A penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs. 21,000 h<strong>as</strong> been imposed by the Court <strong>of</strong> Chief Judicial Magistrate, M<strong>and</strong>la, Madhya Pradeshagainst Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, Director <strong>of</strong> the Company, <strong>as</strong> occupier under the Factories Act <strong>and</strong> Mr. AbhishekJaiswal <strong>as</strong> personnel manager, due to a contravention by the Company <strong>of</strong> provisions for safety <strong>and</strong> welfare <strong>of</strong>workmen under the Factories Act, 1948 <strong>and</strong> the Madhya Pradesh Factories Rules, 1962 leading to death <strong>of</strong> aworkman at the M<strong>and</strong>la Factory premises.There are no outst<strong>and</strong>ing statutory dues on the part <strong>of</strong> the Company:<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> below, the Company h<strong>as</strong> not defaulted in any obligations towards any financial institutions orbanks:We have not obtained consent from SBI for other borrowings from Yes Bank, HSBC <strong>and</strong> Axis Bank for the RailwayProject Loan for which a substantial portion <strong>of</strong> the Net Proceeds <strong>of</strong> the Fresh Issue are intended. We have also failedto file Form 8 before the RoC.The Company h<strong>as</strong> not defaulted in dues towards holders <strong>of</strong> any debt-instruments, fixed deposits or preference shares<strong>of</strong> or with the Company.We confirm that neither: (i) the Company, the <strong>Promoters</strong>, Group Companies, the Promoter Group, the <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>and</strong>persons in control <strong>of</strong> the Company nor (ii) companies with which any <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Promoters</strong>, <strong>Directors</strong> or persons incontrol <strong>of</strong> the Company are or were <strong>as</strong>sociated <strong>as</strong> a promoter, director or person in control, are debarred orprohibited from accessing the capital markets under any order or direction p<strong>as</strong>sed by SEBI or any other authority.190


None <strong>of</strong> the Company, the <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>and</strong> the relatives <strong>of</strong> <strong>Promoters</strong> have been declared <strong>as</strong> wilful defaulters by theRBI or any other governmental authority.The <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>and</strong> Group Companies have further confirmed that there are no violations <strong>of</strong> securities lawscommitted by them in the p<strong>as</strong>t or currently pending against them except in relation to Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited(“KAFL”), a BSE listed Group Company, which h<strong>as</strong> committed the following violations:1. Delay in payment <strong>of</strong> listing fees.2. Non appointment <strong>of</strong> Company Secretary.3. Delay in filing <strong>of</strong> quarterly compliances.4. Non appointment <strong>of</strong> registrar <strong>and</strong> share transfer agent.5. Shares were not dematerialized.6. Delay in filing <strong>of</strong> requirements under Regulations 6(2), 6(4) <strong>and</strong> 8(3) <strong>of</strong> the Takeover Code.7. Delay in compliance with clause 41 <strong>of</strong> the listing agreement.8. Non-compliance with clause 49 <strong>of</strong> the listing agreement.9. Failure to make disclosures under Regulation 7(3) <strong>of</strong> the Takeover Code.10. Failure to make disclosures under Regulation 13(6) <strong>of</strong> the SEBI (Prohibition <strong>of</strong> Insider Trading Regulations),1992KAFL had received various reminders <strong>and</strong> show cause notices from BSE setting out that it is not in compliance withthe aforementioned provisions. Also since no trading h<strong>as</strong> taken place in the equity shares <strong>of</strong> KAFL for more than sixmonths, this may result in adverse consequences for KAFL in terms <strong>of</strong> the SCRR.KAFL received a show cause notice from BSE dated February 13, 2009 stating that due to KAFL’s failure to complywith certain provisions <strong>of</strong> the listing agreement, trading in its securities would be suspended with effect from March 16,2009. The notice also mentioned that in c<strong>as</strong>e KAFL rectified these non-compliances, to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> theExchange, on or before March 6, 2009, trading in its securities would only be suspended for a period <strong>of</strong> 5 days i.e. fromMarch 16, 2009 to March 20, 2009.In response to this notice, KAFL replied to BSE on February 27, 2009 providing the requisite documents <strong>as</strong> sought byBSE. Subsequently, BSE, vide its notice dated March 17, 2009, acknowledged that KAFL h<strong>as</strong> complied with theprovisions <strong>of</strong> the listing agreement to the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the Exchange <strong>and</strong> on account <strong>of</strong> the same, the trading in thesecurities <strong>of</strong> KAFL will be suspended only for a period <strong>of</strong> five trading days i.e., from March 16, 2009 to March 20,2009 <strong>and</strong> also that the suspension shall be revoked with effect from March 23, 2009. Accordingly, the suspension <strong>of</strong>trading in the securities <strong>of</strong> KAFL w<strong>as</strong> revoked with effect from March 23, 2009. However, during the five day periodi.e., from March 16, 2009 to March 20, 2009, the investors <strong>of</strong> the company did not have any exit option.Most <strong>of</strong> the remaining non-compliances have been regularized by KAFL, a few days prior to the date <strong>of</strong> thisProspectus.It should also be noted that a public announcement for the purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> shares <strong>of</strong> KAFL by M/s Padma Impex PrivateLimited h<strong>as</strong> been made on May 18, 2010. Our Promoter Director – Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta <strong>and</strong> certain other members <strong>of</strong>the Promoter Group are proposing to sell their entire stake in KAFL to the acquirers.Contingent liabilities <strong>of</strong> the Company <strong>as</strong> set forth in its re<strong>stated</strong> balance sheet <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> March 31, 2010 are Rs. 205.22million.As per the information available with the company, the following are the details <strong>of</strong> dues to the creditors who haveconfirmed their registration under the Micro, Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006: (MSMEDAct)As at March 31Particulars 2010 2009(Rs. in millions)191


a) Principal amount remaining unpaid 1.54 4.47b) <strong>Interest</strong> due thereon 1.25 0.88c) <strong>Interest</strong> paid by the Company in terms <strong>of</strong> section 16 <strong>of</strong>Micro, Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 - -d) <strong>Interest</strong> due <strong>and</strong> payable for the period <strong>of</strong> delay in makingpayment 0.36 0.48e) <strong>Interest</strong> accrued <strong>and</strong> remaining unpaid 1.25 0.88f) Amount <strong>of</strong> interest due <strong>and</strong> payable on previous year'soutst<strong>and</strong>ing amount 0.88 0.41C<strong>as</strong>es By <strong>and</strong> Against the <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> below there is no (i) litigation, including proceedings relating to or alleging violation <strong>of</strong> statutoryregulations, criminal <strong>of</strong>fences, tax liabilities, labour disputes, proceedings under the Companies Act <strong>and</strong> arbitrations,by or against the <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company; or (ii) pending criminal proceedings or proceedings regardingeconomic, statutory or other civil <strong>of</strong>fences, by or against the <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company:C<strong>as</strong>es Against the <strong>Directors</strong>C<strong>as</strong>es against our Promoter Director, Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h GuptaS.No.Cause Title Dated Name & Address<strong>of</strong> the Court/ArbitrationPanel1. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 4/92Union <strong>of</strong> India vs.Company <strong>and</strong> Dr.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta1992 Special ChiefJudicialMagistrateKanpur NagarNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eAmount underConsideration /Remedy claimedRs.Brief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>eCriminal Rs. 230,724.50 Criminal complaint filedagainst Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupt<strong>as</strong>ince the Company failed todeposit tax deducted at sourceby the Company within theprescribed period while payinginterest to certain third partiesfor AY 1987-1988.StatusPending.*2. Labour Inspector,vs. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta, ManagingDirector, CAPL &Others3. Criminal C<strong>as</strong>e No.3107/2006State <strong>of</strong> MP vs.Mr. Ramesh Daga,March24,2004July20,2005Magistrate (Istcl<strong>as</strong>s) LabourCourt RewaCriminalCriminalProsecution <strong>of</strong>accused.CJM, Rewa Criminal CriminalProsecution <strong>of</strong>accused.On this ground the Income TaxAuthorities have broughtproceedings against theCompany <strong>and</strong> Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta in his capacity <strong>as</strong>director <strong>of</strong> the Company.Allegation regarding breach <strong>of</strong>Rules 3(1), 3(3), 4(1), 4(2), 6(2)<strong>and</strong> 7(3) <strong>of</strong> the Payment <strong>of</strong>Gratuity Rules, 1972 relating tocertain procedural irregularitieson the part <strong>of</strong> CommercialAutomobiles Private Limited(“CAPL”), <strong>of</strong> which Dr.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta is a director,regarding maintenance <strong>of</strong> agratuity plan for its employeesunder the Payment <strong>of</strong> GratuityAct, 1972.Matter involving a truck thathad allegedly been purch<strong>as</strong>edby the complainant from athird party on hire purch<strong>as</strong>e,Pending.*Pending.*192


Mr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta& others4. CriminalComplaintNo.2125/2001Mr. Gulab RamPathak Vs.Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta<strong>and</strong> others5. Ms. Asha Yadavvs. Kail<strong>as</strong>hTraders, PartnerKail<strong>as</strong>h GuptaOctober 10,2007July12,2002* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.JMFC,SonebhadraAMACT,AllahabadCriminalMotorAccidentClaimCriminalprosecution <strong>of</strong> theaccusedRs.1,250,000that w<strong>as</strong> taken over by arepossession agent when thecomplainant defaulted inpayment <strong>of</strong> hire-purch<strong>as</strong>einstallments for the truck.Originally this complaintnamed only the financiers <strong>of</strong>the truck <strong>and</strong> the repossessionagent <strong>as</strong> parties <strong>and</strong> allegedthat parts <strong>of</strong> the truck had beenstolen while underrepossession. The complainantlater named Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta<strong>as</strong> director <strong>of</strong> CAPL <strong>as</strong> anadditional accused, allegingthat he had colluded with theother parties to steal parts <strong>of</strong>the truck. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Guptah<strong>as</strong> filed an application forqu<strong>as</strong>hing <strong>of</strong> the proceedingsagainst him <strong>and</strong> other <strong>of</strong>ficials<strong>of</strong> CAPL named by thecomplainant on the groundsthat neither he nor CAPLplayed any role in the mattersalleged.Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, <strong>as</strong> director<strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto FinanceLimited (“KAFL”) h<strong>as</strong> beennamed in criminal proceedingsregarding repossession <strong>of</strong> avehicle taken on finance fromKAFL, which acts <strong>as</strong> arecovery agent for certainvehicle manufacturers. Theproceedings allege criminalintimidation <strong>and</strong> theft underthe Indian Penal Code, 1860.Application filed for claimcompensation by legal heirs <strong>of</strong>dece<strong>as</strong>ed for death resultingdue to accident by vehiclebelonging to Kail<strong>as</strong>h Traders.Pending.*Pending.*C<strong>as</strong>es against our Promoter Director, Mr. Ajay Gupta1. The Company <strong>and</strong> Mr. Ajay Gupta received a notice dated May 13, 2010 from the Factories Inspectorstating that pursuant to an inspection conducted at the Company’s M<strong>and</strong>la Factory on February 26, 2010,the Company w<strong>as</strong> found to be in violation <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Factories Act, 1948. The inspection w<strong>as</strong>undertaken <strong>as</strong> an accident occurred at the Company’s M<strong>and</strong>la Factory while a tipper truck w<strong>as</strong> beingreversed within the factory premises.Accordingly, a complaint h<strong>as</strong> been filed under Section 105 <strong>of</strong> the Factories Act, 1948 before the ChiefJudicial Magistrate, M<strong>and</strong>la on May 24, 2010. On the said date, the Company h<strong>as</strong> been presented with aletter setting out the allegations against the Company. The letter alleges that the accident involving thetipper truck took place <strong>as</strong> the driver <strong>of</strong> the vehicle could not see who is st<strong>and</strong>ing behind the vehicle whilereversing the tipper truck which w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong> a result <strong>of</strong> the Company failing to effectively supervise the front<strong>and</strong> reverse driving <strong>of</strong> such tipper trucks.2. The Company <strong>and</strong> Mr. Ajay Gupta have received three notices from the Registrar <strong>of</strong> Companies, Kanpurdated May 14, 2009 <strong>as</strong>king to show cause why prosecution should not be launched for a violation <strong>of</strong>Section 193 (pages <strong>of</strong> minutes book not consecutively numbered), 224(8) (non-compliance <strong>of</strong> proceduretowards payment <strong>of</strong> remuneration to auditors) <strong>and</strong> 303(2) (non filing <strong>of</strong> statutory form pursuant to193


confirmation <strong>of</strong> appointment <strong>of</strong> director) <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act. We have filed three separate applicationsfor compounding the above mentioned violations under the Companies Act which are currently pendingbefore the Registrar <strong>of</strong> Companies, Kanpur. Pursuant to the order <strong>of</strong> the Company Law Board, New DelhiBench, New Delhi, dated September 30, 2010 the <strong>of</strong>fence in relation to Section 303(2) have beencompounded <strong>and</strong> the compounding fee <strong>of</strong> Rs. 18,000 h<strong>as</strong> been paid.C<strong>as</strong>es By the <strong>Directors</strong>C<strong>as</strong>es by our Promoter Director, Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h GuptaSr. Cause TitleNo.1. F.A. No. 140/09SMPL (Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta) vs. SantoshKumar Agrawal &State<strong>of</strong>ChhattisgarhDate <strong>of</strong>filingAugust 10,2009Forum/CourtHigh Court<strong>of</strong>ChattisgarhNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCivil SuitMonetaryamountNot<strong>as</strong>certained.SummaryShivam Motors Private Limited(“SMPL”), through its directorDr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, h<strong>as</strong> filedfirst appeal for setting <strong>as</strong>ideorder dismissing SMPL’scounter claim in a matterinvolving tenant’s refusal topay rent <strong>and</strong> allegation made bytenant regarding existence <strong>of</strong> anagreement to sell the propertyin question to the tenant.StatusPending.*There are no adverse findings against <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company <strong>as</strong> regards compliance with securities laws.<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> below, no penalties have been imposed on <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company by any governmentalauthority or court:A penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs. 21,000 h<strong>as</strong> been imposed by the Court <strong>of</strong> Chief Judicial Magistrate, M<strong>and</strong>la, Madhya Pradeshagainst Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, Director <strong>of</strong> the Company, <strong>as</strong> occupier under the Factories Act, due to a contravention bythe Company <strong>of</strong> provisions for safety <strong>and</strong> welfare <strong>of</strong> workmen under the Factories Act, 1948 <strong>and</strong> the MadhyaPradesh Factories Rules, 1962 leading to death <strong>of</strong> a workman at the M<strong>and</strong>la Factory premises. Also, a penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs.39,000 h<strong>as</strong> been imposed by the Court <strong>of</strong> Chief Judicial Magistrate, M<strong>and</strong>la, Madhya Pradesh against Ms. RekhaGupta, former Director <strong>of</strong> the Company, <strong>as</strong> occupier under the Factories Act, due to a contravention by theCompany <strong>of</strong> provisions for safety <strong>and</strong> welfare <strong>of</strong> workmen under the Factories Act, 1948 <strong>and</strong> the Madhya PradeshFactories Rules, 1962 leading to death <strong>of</strong> a workman at the M<strong>and</strong>la Factory premises.There are no outst<strong>and</strong>ing statutory dues on the part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company.There are no p<strong>as</strong>t c<strong>as</strong>es in which <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company h<strong>as</strong> been found guilty <strong>of</strong> economic or other <strong>of</strong>fences.Neither SEBI, nor any stock exchanges have taken any disciplinary action against <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company.<strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company have not defaulted in any obligations towards any financial institutions or banks.The <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company have not defaulted in dues towards holders <strong>of</strong> any debt-instruments, fixed deposits orpreference shares <strong>of</strong> or with the Company.C<strong>as</strong>es By <strong>and</strong> Against the <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>and</strong> Group Companies<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> below there is no (i) litigation, including proceedings relating to tax liabilities, proceedings underthe Companies Act <strong>and</strong> arbitrations, labour disputes by or against the <strong>Promoters</strong>; or (ii) pending criminalproceedings or proceedings regarding economic, statutory or other civil <strong>of</strong>fences by or against the Company:C<strong>as</strong>es Against the <strong>Promoters</strong>194


S.No.Cause Title Dated Name & Address<strong>of</strong> the Court/ArbitrationPanel1. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 4/92Union <strong>of</strong> India vs.Company1992 Special ChiefJudicialMagistrateKanpur NagarNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eAmount underConsideration /Remedy claimedRs.Brief Description <strong>of</strong> C<strong>as</strong>eCriminal Rs. 230,724.50 Criminal complaint filedagainst Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupt<strong>as</strong>ince the Company failed todeposit tax deducted atsource by the Companywithin the prescribed periodwhile paying interest tocertain third parties for AY1987-1988.StatusPending.*2. Labour Inspector,vs. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta, ManagingDirector, CAPL &Others3. Criminal C<strong>as</strong>e No.3107/2006State <strong>of</strong> MP vs.Mr. Ramesh Daga,Mr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta& othersMarch 24,2004July 20,2005Magistrate (Istcl<strong>as</strong>s) LabourCourt RewaCriminalCriminalProsecution <strong>of</strong>accused.CJM, Rewa Criminal CriminalProsecution <strong>of</strong>accused.On this ground the IncomeTax Authorities havebrought proceedings againstthe Company <strong>and</strong> Dr.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta in hiscapacity <strong>as</strong> director <strong>of</strong> theCompany.Allegation regarding breach<strong>of</strong> Rules 3(1), 3(3), 4(1),4(2), 6(2) <strong>and</strong> 7(3) <strong>of</strong> thePayment <strong>of</strong> Gratuity Rules,1972 relating to certainprocedural irregularities onthe part <strong>of</strong> CommercialAutomobiles PrivateLimited (“CAPL”), <strong>of</strong>which Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta isa director, regardingmaintenance <strong>of</strong> a gratuityplan for its employees underthe Payment <strong>of</strong> Gratuity Act,1972.Matter involving a truckthat had allegedly beenpurch<strong>as</strong>ed by thecomplainant from a thirdparty on hire purch<strong>as</strong>e, thatw<strong>as</strong> taken over by arepossession agent when thecomplainant defaulted inpayment <strong>of</strong> hire-purch<strong>as</strong>einstallments for the truck.Originally this complaintnamed only the financiers<strong>of</strong> the truck <strong>and</strong> therepossession agent <strong>as</strong>parties <strong>and</strong> alleged thatparts <strong>of</strong> the truck had beenstolen while underrepossession. Thecomplainant later namedDr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta <strong>as</strong>director <strong>of</strong> CAPL <strong>as</strong> anadditional accused, allegingthat he had colluded withthe other parties to stealparts <strong>of</strong> the truck. Dr.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta h<strong>as</strong> filed anapplication for qu<strong>as</strong>hing <strong>of</strong>the proceedings against him<strong>and</strong> other <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> CAPLnamed by the complainanton the grounds that neitherhe nor CAPL played anyrole in the matters alleged.Pending.*Pending.*195


4. CriminalComplaintNo.2125/2001Mr. Gulab RamPathak Vs.Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta<strong>and</strong> others5. Ms. Asha Yadavvs. Kail<strong>as</strong>hTraders, PartnerKail<strong>as</strong>h GuptaOctober10, 2007July 12,2002* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.JMFC,SonebhadraAMACT,AllahabadCriminalMotorAccidentClaimCriminalprosecution <strong>of</strong> theaccusedRs.1,250,000Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, <strong>as</strong>director <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h AutoFinance Limited (“KAFL”)h<strong>as</strong> been named in criminalproceedings regardingrepossession <strong>of</strong> a vehicletaken on finance fromKAFL, which acts <strong>as</strong> arecovery agent for certainvehicle manufacturers. Theproceedings allege criminalintimidation <strong>and</strong> theft underthe Indian Penal Code,1860.Application filed for claimcompensation legal heirs <strong>of</strong>dece<strong>as</strong>ed for death resultingdue to accident by vehiclebelonging to Kail<strong>as</strong>hTraders.Pending.*Pending.*C<strong>as</strong>es By the <strong>Promoters</strong>C<strong>as</strong>es by our Promoter Director, Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h GuptaSr. Cause TitleNo.1. F.A. No. 140/09SMPL (Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta) vs. SantoshKumar Agrawal &State<strong>of</strong>ChhattisgarhDate <strong>of</strong>filingAugust 10,2009* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.Forum/ CourtHigh Court <strong>of</strong>ChattisgarhNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamountSummaryCivil Suit Not <strong>as</strong>certained. Shivam Motors PrivateLimited (“SMPL”), throughits director Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta,h<strong>as</strong> filed first appeal forsetting <strong>as</strong>ide order dismissingSMPL’s counter claim in amatter involving tenant’srefusal to pay rent <strong>and</strong>allegation made by tenantregarding existence <strong>of</strong> anagreement to sell the propertyin question to the tenant.StatusPending.*C<strong>as</strong>es Against the Group CompaniesCommercial Automobiles Private Limited (“CAPL”)S.No.Cause Title1. Labour Inspector,vs. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta, ManagingDirector, CAPL &Others2. State <strong>of</strong> MP vs. Mr.Ramesh Daga, Mr.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta &othersDate <strong>of</strong>FilingMarch 24,2004July 20,2005ForumMagistrate (Istcl<strong>as</strong>s) LabourCourt RewaNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCriminalMonetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedNotAscertainedCJM, Rewa Criminal NotAscertainedSummaryAllegation regarding breach<strong>of</strong> Rules 3(1), 3(3), 4(1), 4(2),6(2) <strong>and</strong> 7(3) <strong>of</strong> the Payment<strong>of</strong> Gratuity Rules, 1972relating to certain proceduralirregularities on the part <strong>of</strong>CAPL regarding maintenance<strong>of</strong> a gratuity plan for itsemployees under the Payment<strong>of</strong> Gratuity Act, 1972.Matter involving a truck thathad allegedly been purch<strong>as</strong>edby the complainant from athird party on hire purch<strong>as</strong>e,that w<strong>as</strong> taken over by aStatusPending.*Pending.*196


S.No.Cause Title3. CAPL <strong>and</strong>Company vs. Mr.Maharaj SinghBhatia4. CS No. 7A/95Bajaj AutomobilesLtd vs. CAPL5. Suit No. 263A/94Administrator CityCorporation,Jabalpur vs. CAPLDate <strong>of</strong>FilingForumNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e1994 High Court Civil(secondappeal)1997 High Court Civil (firstappeal)2001 High Court Civil (1 stAppeal)Monetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedRs. 18,000(Amount paid)Qu<strong>as</strong>hing <strong>of</strong>decree <strong>of</strong>ejectment frompropertysituated inRewa p<strong>as</strong>sedagainst BajajAutomobilesLimited.Rs. 100,000Summaryrepossession agent when thecomplainant defaulted inpayment <strong>of</strong> hire-purch<strong>as</strong>einstallments for the truck.Originally this complaintnamed only the financiers <strong>of</strong>the truck <strong>and</strong> the repossessionagent <strong>as</strong> parties <strong>and</strong> allegedthat parts <strong>of</strong> the truck hadbeen stolen while underrepossession. Thecomplainant later named Dr.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta <strong>as</strong> director <strong>of</strong>CAPL <strong>as</strong> an additionalaccused, alleging that he hadcolluded with the otherparties to steal parts <strong>of</strong> thetruck. Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta h<strong>as</strong>filed an application forqu<strong>as</strong>hing <strong>of</strong> the proceedingsagainst him <strong>and</strong> other<strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> CAPL named bythe complainant on thegrounds that neither he norCAPL played any role in thematters alleged.CAPL <strong>and</strong> the Company havefiled this appeal against thedecree <strong>of</strong> the lower courtgranting respondent anamount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 18,000 towardsclaims made during warrantyperiod <strong>of</strong> a vehicle. CAPL<strong>and</strong> the Company claim thatthe respondents havebreached terms <strong>of</strong> thewarranty <strong>and</strong> hence are notentitled to any relief.CAPL had filed a civil suitagainst their tenant, BajajAutomobiles Limited tovacate the petrol pumppremises <strong>and</strong> pay arrears <strong>of</strong>Rent <strong>and</strong> mesne pr<strong>of</strong>it.Decree w<strong>as</strong> p<strong>as</strong>sed in favour<strong>of</strong> CAPL by Ist AdditionalDistrict Judge Rewa on May16, 1997 against which thetenant h<strong>as</strong> filed first appeal.CAPL had filed a civil suitagainst Administrator CityCorporation seeking<strong>as</strong>sessment <strong>of</strong> le<strong>as</strong>e rent/le<strong>as</strong>erenewal charges for le<strong>as</strong>edproperty.StatusPending.*Pending.*Pending.*Court <strong>of</strong> 12 th AdditionalDistrict Judge, Jabalpur hadp<strong>as</strong>sed a decree grantingrelief <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100,000 in favour<strong>of</strong> CAPL. The corporationh<strong>as</strong> filed an appeal against thedecree.6. No. 6/93 Ms. 2008 Court <strong>of</strong> 11 th Recovery Rs. 239,440 Accident caused by le<strong>as</strong>ed Pending.*197


S.No.Cause TitleSukhia Bai vs. Mr.Shyamsunder &CAPL7. No. 14/93 Mr.Ramkumar vs.CAPLDate <strong>of</strong>Filing(originalapplicationfiled inyear 2005at MACT,Katni)2008(originalapplicationfiled inyear 2005at MACT,Katni)ForumMotor AccidentClaims Tribunal,JBPCourt <strong>of</strong> 11 thMotor AccidentClaims Tribunal,JBPNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e<strong>of</strong> awardedamountRecovery<strong>of</strong>AwardedamountMonetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedRs. 242,360Summaryvehicle <strong>of</strong> CAPL.Award p<strong>as</strong>sed against CAPLfor payment <strong>of</strong> Rs. 83,000with interest at 12% p.a. fromNovember 21, 1989. Thisapplication is for recovery <strong>of</strong>that amount.Accident caused by le<strong>as</strong>edvehicle <strong>of</strong> CAPL.Award p<strong>as</strong>sed against CAPLfor payment <strong>of</strong> Rs. 82,000with interest at 12% p.a. fromNovember 21, 1989. Thisapplication is for recovery <strong>of</strong>that amount.StatusPending.*8. Ms. Siya Kumarivs. TDLF & CAPL9. Mr. KrishnaKanihya Gotia vs.TELCO & CAPL10. Ms. C. N.Thankamani vs.TML & CAPL1999 Labour Court,Satna2006 NCDRC, NewDelhiApril 07,2009MPSCDRC,BhopalWorkman’sCompensationConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeRs. 213,057Rs. 450,000Claim amountRs. 62,350Accident caused by le<strong>as</strong>edvehicle <strong>of</strong> CAPL.Legal heirs <strong>of</strong> dece<strong>as</strong>ed areclaiming Rs. 213,057 <strong>as</strong>compensation.A Civil c<strong>as</strong>e had been filed byMr. Krishna Kanihya Gotiaagainst TELCO & CAPL fordeficiency in service, ch<strong>as</strong>siscrack, oil leakage &suspension. The c<strong>as</strong>e w<strong>as</strong>dismissed by DistrictConsumer Forum, Satna <strong>and</strong>State Commission Bhopal.Hence this revision petitionNo. 1597/06 h<strong>as</strong> been filed.A civil c<strong>as</strong>e h<strong>as</strong> been filed byagainst CAPL before theDistrict Consumer Forum,Damoh for manufacturingdefects in the vehicle sold(clutch disk <strong>as</strong>sembly, clutchcover <strong>as</strong>sembly, fly wheeletc.). A refund claim for anamount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 27,350 paid forthe repair along withcompensation <strong>and</strong> costs.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -December 12,2010.11. Mr. AnkitSaxena vs. CAPL12. Dr. HimleshCharan Dubey vs.TML <strong>and</strong> CAPLJune 5,2008January 6,2009DCF JabalpurDCF, JabalpurConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeRs. 60,000Rs. 106,066An order w<strong>as</strong> p<strong>as</strong>sed on July4, 2007 by the DistrictConsumer Forum, Damohdismissing the said complaint.Hence this appeal (AppealNo. 1625/2009) before thestate commission.A civil suit w<strong>as</strong> filed by Mr.Ankit Saxena against CAPLseeking Rs. 60,000 <strong>as</strong>compensation for losssuffered due to delay in repair<strong>of</strong> vehicle.A civil suit w<strong>as</strong> filed by Dr.Himlesh Charan Dubeyagainst CAPL for supply <strong>of</strong>defective vehicle resulting inPending.*Pending.*198


S.No.Cause TitleDate <strong>of</strong>FilingForumNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedSummaryrepeated break down <strong>of</strong> thevehicle causing physical,mental <strong>and</strong> financialhar<strong>as</strong>sment.Status13. Mr. JagmohanPrajapati vs. CAPL14. Ms. DevendraPathak vs. SeniorManager, CAPL<strong>and</strong> TML15. Mr. NaveenShankar P<strong>and</strong>ey vs.TML <strong>and</strong> CAPL16. Ms. Kiran Kapoorvs. CAPL <strong>and</strong> TML17. Mr. Abbu Khan vs.CAPLMarch 3,2009March 24,2009May 25,2008July 3,2009July 23,2009DCF, JabalpurDCF, JabalpurDCF, JabalpurDCF, JabalpurDCF, SatnaConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeRs. 42,950Rs. 30,000Rs. 522,270Rs. 64,000Rs. 55,000The complainant h<strong>as</strong> claimedreplacement <strong>of</strong> the vehiclealong with registration <strong>and</strong>insurance charges for the newvehicle <strong>and</strong> a compensation<strong>of</strong> Rs. 106,066 with cost <strong>of</strong>litigation.A civil c<strong>as</strong>e h<strong>as</strong> been filed byMr. Jagmohan Prajapatiagainst CAPL seeking refund<strong>of</strong> labour charges forchanging particular product invehicle without permission <strong>of</strong>the complainant claiming Rs42,950. Complainant claimscost <strong>of</strong> litigation <strong>as</strong> well.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed byMs. Devendra Pathak againstCAPL claiming that CAPLfailed to provide benefitsamounting to Rs. 10,000 <strong>as</strong>promised under a salespromotion scheme to thecomplainant upon purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong>vehicles. Complainant alsoseeks a further compensation<strong>of</strong> Rs. 10,000 along withlitigation charges <strong>of</strong> Rs.10,000.A civil c<strong>as</strong>e had been filed byMr. Naveen Shankar againstTML complaining aboutmajor problems in a vehiclele<strong>as</strong>ed from CAPL such <strong>as</strong>heavy smoke, engine,injection nozzle, turbo chargeetc. If not solved thenreplacement or refund <strong>of</strong> theamount <strong>as</strong> appropriate.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed byMs. Kiran Kapoor againstCAPL <strong>and</strong> TML fordeficiency in service,claiming that the front axelwhich w<strong>as</strong> within warrantyw<strong>as</strong> not changed.A Civil Suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed byAbbu Khan against CAPL fordeficiency in service by not<strong>as</strong>sisting in transfer <strong>of</strong> vehiclein favour <strong>of</strong> complainant.Complainant also claims Rs.25,000 on depreciation <strong>of</strong>spare parts, Rs. 7,416 forinsurance <strong>and</strong> Rs. 17,000 <strong>as</strong>RTO tax plus costs <strong>of</strong>litigation.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Order p<strong>as</strong>sedby DCF, Satnaon February18, 2010directingCAPL toproceed beforethe RTO totransfervehicle infavour <strong>of</strong>complainant<strong>and</strong> providerelevant199


S.No.Cause Title18. Mr. RajendraPratap Singh vs.CAPL19. Mr. Brijnath Kewatvs. CAPL & Ors20. Appeal No.2317/09 Mr.Rajnesh Singh vs.CAPL & others21. Mr. DharmendraSharma vs.CommercialAutomobiles &TML22. Mr. S<strong>and</strong>eep SinghArora vs. TataMotors & others23. Mr. S<strong>and</strong>eep SinghArora vs. TataMotors & others24. Mr. Deen DyalChour<strong>as</strong>iya vs. TataEngineering &Locomotive Co.Ltd. & others25. Mr. LalitShriv<strong>as</strong>tava vs.CAPL26. Mr. Sanjay Jaiswalvs. Tata MotorsLtd. & CAPL27. Mr. SukhendraSingh vs. NationalDate <strong>of</strong>FilingFebruary 3,2009July 23,2009March 17,2010March 22,2010March 7,2007March 7,2007December03, 2008February17, 2009November11, 2008October17, 2008ForumDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forumspa, JabalpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, ShahdolStateCommissionBhopalM.P.StateConsumerDisputesRedressalCommissionBhopalM.P.StateConsumerDisputesRedressalCommissionBhopalM.P.StateConsumerDisputesRedressalCommissionBhopalM.P.StateConsumerDisputesRedressalCommissionBhopalM.P.StateConsumerDisputesRedressalCommissionBhopalM.P.StateConsumerDisputesRedressalCommissionBhopalM.P.StateConsumerNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedRs. 197,000Rs. 150,000Rs. 403,664NotAscertained.NotAscertained.NotAscertained.Rs. 81,970Rs. 1,000Rs. 81,970Rs.350,000SummaryComplainant h<strong>as</strong> filedcomplaint for issue <strong>of</strong> noobjectioncertificate fortransfer <strong>of</strong> vehicle incomplainant’s name <strong>and</strong>claiming compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs.197,000.Complainant h<strong>as</strong> filedcomplaint due to problem inair-conditioning <strong>and</strong> gear box<strong>of</strong> vehicle seekingcompensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 150,000.An Appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filedagainst the order datedAugust 12, 2009 p<strong>as</strong>sed byDistrict Consumer Forum,Rewa alleging deficiency inservice by CAPL.An appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filedagainst the order dated May27, 2009 p<strong>as</strong>sed by DistrictConsumer Forum, Rewaalleging deficiency in serviceby CAPL.An appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filedagainst the order dated May27, 2009 p<strong>as</strong>sed by DistrictConsumer Forum, Rewaalleging deficiency in serviceby CAPL.An appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filedagainst the order dated April29, 2008 p<strong>as</strong>sed by DistrictConsumer Forum, Rewaalleging deficiency in serviceby CAPL.An appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filedagainst the order <strong>of</strong> theDistrict Consumer Forumdismissing applicationclaiming deficiency <strong>of</strong> serviceby CAPL.An appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filedagainst the order <strong>of</strong> theDistrict Consumer Forumdismissing applicationclaiming deficiency <strong>of</strong> serviceby CAPL.An appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filedagainst the order <strong>of</strong> theDistrict Consumer Forumdismissing applicationclaiming deficiency <strong>of</strong> serviceby CAPL.An appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filedagainst the order <strong>of</strong> theStatusdocuments <strong>and</strong>pay Rs. 5,000<strong>as</strong> loss <strong>and</strong> Rs.10,000 fordeficiency inservice <strong>and</strong>unfair tradepractice.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*200


S.No.Cause TitleInsurance Co. &others.28. Mr. Bhailal Tiwarivs. Mr. Vive KSoni & Ors29. Mr. Jitendra Mishravs. CAPL30. Mr. Ramvil<strong>as</strong>Gupta vs. TataMotors & Ors31. Mr. RamakantAw<strong>as</strong>thi vs.Agrawal Motors &Ors32. Mr. NitinShriv<strong>as</strong>tav vs.ICICI LombordGeneral InsuranceCo. Pvt. Ltd. Ors33. Mr. Sudhir Jainvs. CAPL & Ors34. Mr. ShatrughanSingh vs. CAPL& Ors35. Mr. R. K. Samaiyavs. CAPL & Ors36. Ms. Amrata Yadavvs. Tata Motors &Ors37. Mr. Ashok KumarAgrawal vs. TataMotors & OrsDate <strong>of</strong>FilingApril 25,2009December16, 2008January 29,2009February 1,2010January 23,2010September2, 2010September2, 2010January 17,2010December28, 2010December18, 2009ForumDisputesRedressalCommissionBhopalDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, ShahadolDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, JabalpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, SidhiDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, SatnaDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, SahdolDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, KatniDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, SidhiDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, JabalpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, JabalpurDistrictConsumerDisputesNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedRs. 40,000Rs. 170,000Rs. 437,718Rs.148,314Rs. 50,000Rs. 380,000Rs. 281,000Rs. 430,305Rs. 146,993NotAscertained.SummaryDistrict Consumer Forumwhere an application claimingdeficiency in service providedby CAPL h<strong>as</strong> been upheld.CAPL h<strong>as</strong> paid compensation<strong>of</strong> Rs. 350,000 to theapplicant.An appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filedagainst the order <strong>of</strong> theDistrict Consumer Forumdismissing applicationclaiming deficiency <strong>of</strong> serviceby CAPL.A complaint h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe applicant before theDistrict Consumer Forumalleging deficiency in servicesprovided by CAPL.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant againstCAPL claiming the balanceportion <strong>of</strong> insurance on value<strong>of</strong> stolen car not being paidfor by the insurance company.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant claiming Rs.148,314 due to a problemfaced by him in thefunctioning <strong>of</strong> the vehicle.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant against theinsurance company forrejecting the claim raised bythe claimant <strong>and</strong> h<strong>as</strong> addedCAPL <strong>as</strong> a party to theproceeding.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant for facingvarious problems in his car<strong>and</strong> is claiming Rs. 25,036 forrepairing the fuel meter <strong>and</strong>Rs. 300,000 towards mentalagony caused along withother expenses incurredamounting to Rs. 50,000.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant due to theproblems faced by him in thehydraulic system claiming Rs.281,000 <strong>and</strong> other chargesincurred.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant claimingdeficiency in services inrepairing a car, claiming acompensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 430,305.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant claimingdeficiency in servicing <strong>of</strong> hisvehicle, claiming acompensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 146,993A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant claimingdeficiency in serviceStatusPending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*201


S.No.Cause Title38. Mr. Santosh Morvs. Tata Motors &Ors39. Mr. Liyakat Alivs. CommercialAutomobiles (p)Ltd.40. Mr. Ashok KumarShukla vs. TataMotor & 2 Others41. Mr. Vinay KumarVishwakarma vs.Oriental Insurance& Ors42. Mf. Amarjeet KaurChhabra vs. M/sSanghi Brothers &Ors43. Mr. GyanendraSingh vs.CommercialAutomobiles & Ors44. Mr. Suresh Patelvs. CommercialAutomobiles &others45. Mr. GhanshyamTiwari vs.CommercialAutomobiles &others46. Mr. DevendraGautam vs.CommercialAutomobiles &othes47. Mr. Ram Nath vs.Tata Motors Ltd. &others48. Mr. D<strong>as</strong>si AlisRamesh Paroha vs.Mr. PraladhBurmanDate <strong>of</strong>FilingMarch 3,2010April 3,2010January 8,2010March 12,2010January 8,2010February 5,2010February18, 2008October12, 2002March 9,2009January 17,2009October30, 2006ForumRedressal Forum, ChhatarpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, JabalpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, JabalpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, NarsinghpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, NarsinghpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, NarsinghpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, NarsinghpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, M<strong>and</strong>laDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, AllahabadDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, RewaDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressal Forum, SonbhadraHigh CourtNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>eCivil (MiscAppeal)No.3900/06Monetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedRs. 413,014Rs. 892,396Rs. 87,880Rs. 455,000Rs. 10,000Rs. 200,000Rs. 116,000Rs. 116,000Rs. 175,000Rs. 25,000Rs. 304,500SummaryA civil Suit h<strong>as</strong> been filedseeking replacement <strong>of</strong>vehicle purch<strong>as</strong>ed fromCAPL or refund <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> thevehicle along with thecompensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 50,000<strong>and</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> Rs. 5,000.A civil Suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant claiming amanufacturing defect in thevehicle, seeking replacement<strong>of</strong> the vehicle along with acompensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 150,000.A civil Suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant seekingchange <strong>of</strong> the ch<strong>as</strong>sis frameunder warranty or refund <strong>of</strong>Rs. 47,880 <strong>and</strong> to pay anamount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 40,000 onaccount <strong>of</strong> losses suffered.CAPL h<strong>as</strong> been added <strong>as</strong> aparty to a civil suit filed bythe complainant against theinsurance company claimingpayment for total loss <strong>of</strong> thevehicle which w<strong>as</strong> parked <strong>and</strong>being repaired at CAPL’sworkshop in Ghana.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant seekingchange <strong>of</strong> gear box <strong>of</strong> thevehicle <strong>and</strong> claiming Rs.10,000 <strong>as</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> litigation.A complaint h<strong>as</strong> been filedseeking a direction to CAPLfor change <strong>of</strong> nozzle pump <strong>of</strong>the vehicle <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong>compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 200,000.A civil Suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant seekingdirection for rele<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong>vehicle <strong>and</strong> payment <strong>of</strong>compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 116,000.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant seekingdirections for rele<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong>vehicle <strong>and</strong> payment <strong>of</strong>compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 185,000.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant seekingdirections for rele<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong>vehicle <strong>and</strong> payment <strong>of</strong>compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 175,000.A civil suit h<strong>as</strong> been filed bythe complainant for seekingdirection for rele<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong>vehicle <strong>and</strong> payment <strong>of</strong>compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 25,000An appeal for enhancement<strong>of</strong> award dated June 30, 2006p<strong>as</strong>sed in Motor Vehicle C<strong>as</strong>eNo. 77/2006 by ThirdStatusPending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*202


S.No.Cause Title49. Rahul Gautam vsNational InsuranceCodes50. Rajnesh Singh vs.Telco <strong>and</strong> others51. Devendra Gautamvs. Tata MotorsLtd.52. Arjun Khelwani vs.CAPL53. Bhagwan Pr<strong>as</strong>adSahu vs. Manager,CAPL54. Rishab Dev P<strong>and</strong>eyvs. CAPL55. S<strong>and</strong>eep Chapra vs.CAPL56. Sajjan Singh vs.Manager CAPL57. Kamlesh Dubey vs.CAPL58. Ranjeet Singh vs.CAPL59. Satyendra Golwanivs. CAPLDate <strong>of</strong>FilingFebruary 3,2010March 17,2010April 7,2010April 22,2010April 22,2010June 9,2010June 24,2010January 19,2010April 23,2010February26, 2010September17, 2010ForumCJM II, RewaDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum, BhopalDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum,SonbhadraDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum, RewaDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum, JabalpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum, RewaDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum, ShahdolDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum, RewaDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum, ShahdolDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum, KatniDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCivil C<strong>as</strong>e.C<strong>as</strong>e No.8B/09ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e No.A2317/09ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e No.52/09ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e No.102/210ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e No.146/2010ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e No.99/10ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e No.31/10ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e. No.503/09ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e. C<strong>as</strong>eNo. 35/10ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e No.15/10ConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e No.371/09Monetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedRs. 22,000Rs. 403,664Rs. 657,000Rs. 166,050Rs. 120,000Rs. 183,00Rs. 130,000Rs. 223,000Rs. 432,075Rs. 373,849Rs. 499,717SummaryAdditional AMACT, Katniwhereby awarded only Rs.45,500.Suit for refund <strong>of</strong> amountclaimed from insurancecompany against accident <strong>of</strong>vehicle along with interest at12% per annum with costs<strong>and</strong> compensationAppeal against order p<strong>as</strong>sedby District Consumer Forum,Rewa in executionproceedings where an arrestwarrant issued against theconsumer <strong>and</strong> in relation toattachment <strong>of</strong> immovableproperty <strong>of</strong> the guarantorComplaint filed allegingdeficiency in service providedby CAPL.Complaint filed againstCAPL alleging deficiency inservice provided by CAPL.Complaint filed againstCAPL alleging deficiency inservice provided by CAPL.Complaint filed againstCAPL alleging deficiency inservice provided by CAPL.Complaint filed againstCAPL alleging deficiency inservice provided by CAPL.Complaint filed againstCAPL alleging deficiency inservice provided by CAPL.Complaint filed againstCAPL alleging deficiency inservice provided by CAPL.Complaint filed againstCAPL alleging deficiency inservice provided by CAPL.Complaint filed againstCAPL alleging deficiency inservice provided by CAPL.StatusPending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 29,2010.Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing –October 23,2010Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing –203


S.No.Cause Title60. MunnalalKushwaha vs.CAPL61. MadanlalChowthwani vs.CAPLDate <strong>of</strong>FilingFebruary18, 2010December21, 2009* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.ForumForum, JabalpurDistrictConsumerDisputesRedressalForum, M<strong>and</strong>laTehsildar Nazul,JabalpurNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eConsumerC<strong>as</strong>e No.20/10Civil C<strong>as</strong>e.No. 15 A-6A/2009-10Monetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedRs. 480,000Not availableSummaryComplaint filed againstCAPL alleging deficiency inservice provided by CAPL.Suit filed by plaintiff formutation <strong>of</strong> his name in therelevant l<strong>and</strong> records inrelation to certain excess l<strong>and</strong>alleged to have been occupiedby CAPL over <strong>and</strong> above thel<strong>and</strong> purch<strong>as</strong>ed by it.StatusOctober12,2010Pending.*Pending.*List <strong>of</strong> PenaltiesS. No. Forum/Penalising Authority Details <strong>of</strong> Penalty/Findings <strong>of</strong> Guilt1. Collector <strong>of</strong> Stamps, Jabalpur Rs. 5000 under Section 40(b) <strong>of</strong> the Indian Stamp Act by orderdated August 14, 2007 in c<strong>as</strong>e No. 143/B -103/ Section33/06-072. JMFC, Labor Court, Rewa Fine Rs. 600 by order dated January 28, 2008 in c<strong>as</strong>e no.170/MWA/05 for breach <strong>of</strong> Section 22A Minimum Wages Act,1948Shivam Motors Private Limited (“SMPL”)Sr. Cause TitleNo.1. F.A. No. 11/08Mr. Santosh KumarAgrawal vs.SMPL2. App. No. MCA1316/97Mr. Kulpati Yadav &Ors. vs.Mr. Alok Chatterjee &Ors. & SMPL &N.I.Co.3. App. No. MCA1047/07Ms. Kol Gail Ammavs. SMPL & Ors.4. App No. MCA 572/01Mr. Santosh Kumar vs.SMPL & Ors.Date <strong>of</strong>filingJanuary 18,2008January 9,1998February 3,2000February 3,2000Forum/CourtDistrictJudge KorbaHigh Court<strong>of</strong> MPHigh Court<strong>of</strong> MPHigh Court<strong>of</strong> MPNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamountSummaryCivil Suit Rs. 200,000 Suit filed against SMPL torecover arrears <strong>of</strong> rentfrom SMPL with respect tole<strong>as</strong>ed property inquestion.MotorAccidentClaimMotorAccidentClaimMotorAccidentClaimRs. 500,000Rs.1,020,000Rs. 650,000Claim filed by complainantclaiming compensation forloss suffered due toaccident caused by therelevant vehicle in questionbelonging to SMPL.Claim filed by complainantclaiming compensation forloss suffered due toaccident caused by therelevant vehicle in questionbelonging to SMPL.Claim filed by complainantclaiming compensation forloss suffered due toaccident caused by therelevant vehicle in questionbelonging to SMPL.Pending.StatusMatter conditionallystayed by HighCourt<strong>of</strong>Chhattisgarh <strong>and</strong> Rs.200,000 paid earlierby SMPL have beenrefunded to it.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*5. App No. 859/04Raju Urf Rajendra vs.February 23,2004High<strong>of</strong> MPCourtMotorAccidentRs. 169,853Claim filed by complainantclaiming compensation forPending.*204


Sr.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong>filingForum/CourtNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamountSummarySMPL & 3 Ors. Claim loss suffered due toaccident caused by therelevant vehicle in questionbelonging to SMPL.March 1, High Court Motor Rs. 50,0002004 <strong>of</strong> MP AccidentClaim6. App. No. 628/07Pappu Urf SurendraSinghvs. SMPL UII & 2 Ors.7. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 151/07Mr. Ashok KumarDhulyanivs.SMPL & TM8. 193/08Mr. Ashish Ku. Guptavs.SMPL & TML9. 105/09Maheswari CoalBeneficiationvs.TML & SMPL10. 159/04 Mr. Vik<strong>as</strong>hGoelvs.SMPLMarch242008July132009/SMPLOctober132009/ TMLNovember 5,2009August 3,2004C.D.R.F.BSPC.D.R.F.BSPC.D.R.F.BSPC.D.R.F.BSPConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeClaim filed by complainantclaiming compensation forloss suffered due toaccident caused by therelevant vehicle in questionbelonging to SMPL.Rs. 100,000 Complaint filed againstSMPL alleging deficiencyin service provided bySMPL.Rs. 91,000 Complaint filed againstSMPL alleging deficiencyin service provided bySMPL causing loss <strong>and</strong>mental agony tocomplainant.Rs. 250,000 Complaint filed againstSMPL alleging deficiencyin service provided bySMPL.Rs. 4,000 Complaint filed againstSMPL alleging deficiencyin service provided bySMPL.Pending.*Pending.StatusNext date <strong>of</strong> hearing-November 4, 2010Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing-November 19, 2010Pending.*H<strong>as</strong> been decided infavour <strong>of</strong> theCompany on March25, 201011. 265/09 Ms.Bhagirathi Brijw<strong>as</strong>ivs.SMPL & TMF12. 294/08 Mr.Charan Singhvs.SMPL & TMF13. 242/09 Ms.Shanti Devivs.SMPL & TMF14. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 577/09Ms. Phoolmani Tirkivs.SMPL15. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 32B/08SMPL vs.Mr. Shiv Agrawal16. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 38B/08SMPL vs.Mr. S.H.Z. NaqviJuly 13,2009November12, 2009July 2, 2009November24, 2009February 6,2008May 6, 2008C.D.R.F.BSPC.D.R.F.BSPC.D.R.F.BSPCivil CourtAmbikapurCivilJudge/BSPCivilJudge/BSPConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeRs. 100,000 Complaint filed againstSMPL alleging deficiencyin service provided bySMPL.Rs. 20,000 Complaint filed againstSMPL alleging deficiencyin service provided bySMPL.Complainant also seekingno-objection certificatefrom Tata Motors FinanceLimited for transfer <strong>of</strong>vehicle in name <strong>of</strong>complainant.Consumer NotComplaint filed againstDispute <strong>as</strong>certained SMPL alleging deficiencyin service provided bySMPL.Consumer NotComplaint filed againstDispute <strong>as</strong>certained SMPL alleging deficiencyin service provided bySMPL since the vehicle inquestion w<strong>as</strong> repossesseddue to default in payment<strong>of</strong> installments.Civil Suit Not available Suit filed by SMPL forrecovery <strong>of</strong> monies due onaccount <strong>of</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> vehicle.ExecutionPetitionRs. 17,266with interestat the rate <strong>of</strong>6%Execution proceedingsfiled by SMPL to recoverarrears <strong>of</strong> rent due forproperty le<strong>as</strong>ed by SMPL.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing-November 9, 2010Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing-October 20, 2010H<strong>as</strong> been decidedagainst Tata MotorsFinance on July 26,2010C<strong>as</strong>e h<strong>as</strong> beenrejected by the CivilCourtMatter h<strong>as</strong> beencompromised withparty <strong>and</strong> moniesreceived.C<strong>as</strong>e h<strong>as</strong> beendecreed against theparty205


Sr.No.Cause Title17. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 18B/07SMPL vs.Mr. Santosh KumarAgrawal18. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 16B/07SMPL vs.Mr. Santosh KumarAgrawal decree19. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 25A/08SMPL vs.Bank <strong>of</strong> India & 2 Ors.20. C<strong>as</strong>e No. -/08SMPL vs.Mr. Shyamlal Vidhani21. App. No. 578/09Mr. K.K. Agrawal vs.SMPL & TML22. App. No. 250/09TML & SMPLvs.Mr. Narendra KumarHalwai23. App. No. 577/09Mr. Phool Mani Tirkivs.TML & SMPL24. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 173/06Mr. Manoj Lala vs.SMPL25. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 132/04SMPL vs.Mr. Rajesh Sriv<strong>as</strong>tav26. C<strong>as</strong>e No. BSP-58/WCA/COC/ B/08Mr. Yogesh ChndraNevar & 3 Ors. vs.SMPL27. Appeal number not yetallottedMr. Vijay KumarSawdia v. SMPL&TML28. App. No.: 71/10Mr. Virendra KumarSingh v. SMPL &TML29. App. No.: 242/09Shanti Devi Nathani v.TFL & SMPLDate <strong>of</strong>filingDecember 6,2007Forum/CourtDistrictJudge/Korba2003 DistrictJudge/KorbaSeptember17, 2002October 10,2008October 14,2009May 21,2009November24, 2009September19. 2006October 19,2004June 26,2008February 25,2010March 16,2010July 9, 2010CivilJudge/BSPCivilJudge/BSPStateCommissionRaipurStateCommissionRaipurStateCommissionRaipurC.D.R.F.BSPC.D.R.F.BSPLabourCourt/BSPStateCommissionRaipurStateCommissionRaipurStateCommissionRaipurNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamountSummaryMatter h<strong>as</strong> been decreed infavour <strong>of</strong> SMPL.Civil Suit Rs. 4,61,231 Suit filed by SMPL torecover arrears <strong>of</strong> rent duefor property le<strong>as</strong>ed bySMPL to Mr. SantoshKumar Agrawal.ExecutionPetitionCivil Suit Rs. 42,439<strong>and</strong>Rs. 5,440Rs. 516,708 Execution proceedingsfiled by SMPL to recoverarrears <strong>of</strong> rent due forproperty le<strong>as</strong>ed by SMPL.Matter h<strong>as</strong> been decreed infavour <strong>of</strong> SMPL.Suit filed by SMPL againstBank <strong>of</strong> India <strong>and</strong> 2 othersseeking directions forissuance <strong>of</strong> duplicatecheques since originalcheques were depositedwith Bank <strong>of</strong> India,Bil<strong>as</strong>pur but were lost intransit during collection <strong>of</strong>the amount.Civil Suit Rs. 34,285 Suit filed by SMPL forrecovery <strong>of</strong> monies due onaccount <strong>of</strong> repair <strong>of</strong>vehicle.Consumer Rs. 95,100 Suit filed against SMPLalleging deficiency inservices by SMPL.Deficiency inserviceRs. 550,463Suit filed against SMPLalleging deficiency inservices by SMPL <strong>and</strong>claiming replacement <strong>of</strong>defected vehicle.Consumer Rs. 263 000 Suit filed against SMPLalleging deficiency inservices by SMPL.Consumer Not available Suit filed against SMPLalleging deficiency inservices by SMPL.Consumer Rs. 106,000 Suit filed against SMPLalleging deficiency inservices by SMPL.Labour Rs. 438,820 Suit filed by workmen forDisputeclaiming compensationunder WorkmenCompensation Act, 1923for injury caused.Consumer Rs. 7,800 Suit filed against SMPLalleging deficiency inservices by SMPL.ConsumerRs.1,594,169Suit filed against SMPLalleging deficiency inservices by SMPL.Consumer Not available Suit filed against SMPLalleging deficiency inservices by SMPL.Pending.*Pending.*StatusExecutionproceedings havebeen stayed sinceMr. Santosh KumarAgrawal h<strong>as</strong> paidthe arrears <strong>of</strong> rent onJanuary 14, 2010.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing-October 30, 2020C<strong>as</strong>e h<strong>as</strong> beenrejected by the CivilCourtPending.*Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing-December 4, 2010Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing– November 27,2010Pending.*Pending.*206


Sr. Cause TitleNo.30. App. No.: 100/10Vishwa Nath Singhalv. SMPL* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.Date <strong>of</strong>filingJuly 5, 2010Forum/CourtStateCommissionRaipurNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamountSummaryConsumer Not available Suit filed against SMPLalleging deficiency inservices by SMPL.Pending.*StatusList <strong>of</strong> Notices Issued by SMPLSr.No.DateNoticeIssued ByNotice Issued To Summary Monetary Amount1. March 18, 2009By Registered ADSMPL/BSP Not <strong>as</strong>certained. Recovery <strong>of</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing dues towardspurch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> turbo charger by the party.Rs. 14,0622. November 11, 2009By Register AD3. October 20, 2009By Register AD4. August 17, 2009By Register AD5. March 11, 2010By Register ADSMPL/BSPSMPL/BSPSMPL/BSPMr. Ram Bharose TehsilM<strong>and</strong>eragarh JilaKoriyaMr. Prajeshwar Soni &Mr.Anil GuptaMr. Dushyant SinghNetamSMPL/BSP Ms. Vimla SinghThakurNotice issued against Mr. Ram Bharose whoh<strong>as</strong> defaulted in paying installments towardsvehicle purch<strong>as</strong>ed due to which it w<strong>as</strong>repossessed <strong>and</strong> sold by Tata Finance Limited.Notice issued in connection with recovery <strong>of</strong>balance sums towards purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> vehicle. Noobjectioncertificate from Tata FinanceLimited for transfer <strong>of</strong> vehicle can only beissued subsequent to receipt <strong>of</strong> balance sums.Notice issued by SMPL for recovery <strong>of</strong>balance amounts towards purch<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> vehicle.The vehicle h<strong>as</strong> been repossessed by TataFinance Limited due to not having paidinstallments <strong>and</strong> interest.Notice issued by SMPL for claim against theft<strong>of</strong> vehicleNot <strong>as</strong>certained.Not <strong>as</strong>certained.Rs. 96,028Rs. 458, 9366. March 31, 2009By Register ADSMPL Mr. Manjeet Singh Hora Notice issued by SMPL for recovery <strong>of</strong>amount for dishonour <strong>of</strong> chequeRs. 161,378Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited (“KAFL”)Sr.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/ Court Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e1. Criminal October 10, JMFC, CriminalComplaint 2007SonebhadraNo.2125/2001Mr. Gulab RamPathak Vs.Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>hGupta <strong>and</strong> others2. C<strong>as</strong>e No. MA-2001/2002 Mr.Lakhan Lal vs.KAFL & others3. C<strong>as</strong>e No.MCC-927/2006OrientalInsurance Co. vs.KAFL4. C<strong>as</strong>e No. MA-372/2004 Mr.Ramkumar vs.Baijnath &KAFL2001 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2006 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2004 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradeshMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMonetaryamountCriminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accusedRs. 250,000Rs. 544,411Rs. 245,000SummaryKAFL h<strong>as</strong> been named incriminal proceedingsregarding repossession <strong>of</strong>a vehicle taken on financefrom KAFL, which acts <strong>as</strong>a recovery agent forcertainvehiclemanufacturers. Theproceedings allegecriminal intimidation <strong>and</strong>theft under the IndianPenal Code, 1860.Appeal filed by KAFLagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalenhancing award <strong>of</strong>compensation to Rs.250,000.C<strong>as</strong>e filed against order <strong>of</strong>MACT in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toStatusPending. *Pending. *Pending. *Pending. *207


Sr.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/ Court Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e5. C<strong>as</strong>e No. MA-363/2004 Mr.Rakesh vs.Baijnath &KAFL6. C<strong>as</strong>e No. MA-370/2004Mr. Ramesh vs.Baijnath &KAFL7. C<strong>as</strong>e No. MA-2412/2001Mr. Nemuddinvs. Mr. ChannuLal Choubey &others8. C<strong>as</strong>e No..MA-3024/2004 Mr.Ramdulare vs.Mr. Mohd.Sammim &others9. C<strong>as</strong>e No. MA-871/2004 Mr.Ch<strong>and</strong>an vs.Mr. Vaijnath &KAFL10. C<strong>as</strong>e No. MA-3035/2004 Mr.Ch<strong>and</strong>an Singhvs.Mr. Vaijnath &KAFL11. C<strong>as</strong>e No. MANo. 4309/06 Mr.Ram Narayan vs.Mr. Baijnath &others12. M.A. No.1460/2001Ms. Uamadevivs.M/s ShivamCommercialServices Ltd.13. F.A. No. 405/07KAFL vs.Nanka & others14. F.A. No. 545/02O.I.C. vs.Ms. Mohani &others15. C<strong>as</strong>e No.MACT-244/99Ms. Rajkumari &othersvs.2004 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2004 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2001 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2004 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2004 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2004 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2006 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2001 High Court <strong>of</strong>MadhyaPradesh2007 High Court <strong>of</strong>Allahabad2002 High Court <strong>of</strong>Allahabad1999 AMACTSihoraMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMonetaryamountRs. 245,000Rs. 245,000Rs. 706,346Rs. 1,970,000Rs. 260,000Rs. 500,000Rs. 793,000Rs. 500,000Not <strong>as</strong>certained.Rs. 830,000Rs. 1,420,000SummaryKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Appeal filed by applicantagainst order <strong>of</strong> tribunalgranting award in matterinvolving accident causedby vehicle belonging toKAFL.Claim filed by applicant inmatter involving accidentcaused by vehiclebelonging to KAFL.StatusPending. *Pending. *Pending. *Pending. *Pending. *Pending. *Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*208


Sr.No.Mr. Ambey Lal16. MACT C<strong>as</strong>e No.09/93Ms. Manju Devivs.Ms. ChintamaniCause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/ Court Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e& others (KAFL)17. MACT C<strong>as</strong>eNo.11/93Ms. Tara Devi vs.SCSL & others18. C.P. No.529/2008Mr. ManojKumar MishraVs. ShivamCommercialServices & others19. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 01/02Ms. Sushila Devi& others vs.KAFL & others20. MACTNo.48/2003Mr. Raju Khaticvs.KAFL&other21. C.P.NO.248/2004Ms. Rekha bai &other vs.KAFL&other22. C<strong>as</strong>e No.395/WCA/02Mr. Niw<strong>as</strong> Tiwari& others vs. M/sRamniw<strong>as</strong> &others23. C<strong>as</strong>e No.70/2004Mr. Amit Kumarvs.KAFL24. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 77/2008Mr. Gulab RamPathak vs.KAFL25. C<strong>as</strong>e No.160/2004Mr. N<strong>and</strong>Kishore Singh vs.Kail<strong>as</strong>h AutoFinance Ltd.1993 VI ADJAllahabad1993 VI ADJAllahabad2008 Ist ADJAllahabad2002 XI ADJDhanbadMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccidentMotorAccident2003 MACT Ratlam MotorAccident2004 MACTNagpur2002 CommissionerW.C. LabourCourt Rewa2004 DCF,Ch<strong>and</strong>auli2008 DCF,Sonbhadra2004 D.C.F.Gazipur (U.P.)26. T.S. No. 65/95 1995 C.J. Sr.Mr. GaneshDivision AskaP<strong>and</strong>a Vs.KAFL* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.MotorAccidentMotorAccidentConsumercomplaintConsumercomplaintConsumercomplaintMonetaryamountRs. 500,000Rs. 500,000Rs. 1,000,000Rs. 160,000Rs. 490,000Rs. 400,000Rs. 216,810SummaryClaim filed by applicant inmatter involving accidentcaused by vehiclebelonging to KAFL.Claim filed by applicant inmatter involving accidentcaused by vehiclebelonging to KAFL.Claim filed by applicant inmatter involving accidentcaused by vehiclebelonging to KAFL.Claim filed by applicant inmatter involving accidentcaused by vehiclebelonging to KAFL.Claim filed by applicant inmatter involving accidentcaused by vehiclebelonging to KAFL.Claim filed by applicant inmatter involving accidentcaused by vehiclebelonging to KAFL.Claim filed by applicant inmatter involving accidentcaused by vehiclebelonging to KAFL.Rs. 67,500 A claim h<strong>as</strong> been madeagainst KAFL before theDistrict Consumer Forumalleging deficiency inservice by KAFL.Rs. 1,900,000 Suit filed claimingcompensation recovery <strong>of</strong>monies under HP ContractNo. SCSL-279. during theperiod 1994 to January 8,2008).Rs. 237,000 A claim h<strong>as</strong> been madeagainst KAFL before theDistrict Consumer Forumalleging deficiency inservice by KAFL due todefect in vehicle underwarranty.Civil Suit Rs. 300,000 Civil suit pending beforeCivil Judge, Sr. DivisionAska.StatusPending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Kail<strong>as</strong>h TradersSr. Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/ Nature <strong>of</strong> MonetarySummaryStatusNo.Court C<strong>as</strong>e amount1. Ms. Asha Yadav July 12, 2002 AMACT, Motor Rs.1,250,000 Application filed for Pending.*209


Sr.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/Courtvs. Kail<strong>as</strong>hAllahabadTraders* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eAccidentClaimMonetaryamountSummaryclaiming compensation bylegal heirs <strong>of</strong> dece<strong>as</strong>ed fordeath resulting due toaccident by vehiclebelonging to Kail<strong>as</strong>hTraders.StatusC<strong>as</strong>es By the Group CompaniesCommercial Automobiles Private Limited (“CAPL”)S.No.Cause Title1. WP No.784/2004CAPL vs. State<strong>of</strong> MP2. WP No.429/2008CAPL vs. State<strong>of</strong> MP3. Civil suit no.14B/09 CAPLvs. Shivam AutoMotors4 Civil suit no.15B/09 CAPLvs. M/s AnuMotors5. CAPL vs.Central Bank <strong>of</strong>IndiaDate <strong>of</strong>FilingForum2004 High Court<strong>of</strong> MP2008 High Court<strong>of</strong> MPFebruary 7,2009February 7,2009VII CJI,JabalpurVII CJI,Jabalpur2001 12thAdditionalDistrictJudge (JBP)Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCivil SuitCivil SuitMonetaryamount,injunctionor otherremedyclaimedMutation inle<strong>as</strong>ed plot<strong>and</strong> renewalMutation inLe<strong>as</strong>ed plot<strong>and</strong> renewalCivil Suit Rs. 15,519plus costs <strong>of</strong>litigationCivil Suit Rs. 11,961plus costs <strong>of</strong>litigationDecreeExecution(Civil)Rs. 37,515SummaryWrit petition filed by CAPL againstthe order dated August 2, 2003 p<strong>as</strong>sedby Revenue Secretary in C<strong>as</strong>e No.69/97 in which the le<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> plot No.<strong>124</strong> (area 16,875 sq. ft.) granted infavour <strong>of</strong> CAPL w<strong>as</strong> cancelled.Writ petition filed by CAPL againstthe order dated October 20, 2007p<strong>as</strong>sed by Revenue Board in C<strong>as</strong>e No.69/97 pursuant to which an order formutation <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> in the revenue recordin favour <strong>of</strong> CAPL p<strong>as</strong>sed by thetehsildar w<strong>as</strong> set <strong>as</strong>ide.Civil suit filed against Shivam AutoMotors for recovery <strong>of</strong> monies dueamounting to Rs. 15519 with interest at12% p.a. towards debit balance in theaccount.Civil suit filed against M/s Anu Motorsfor recovery <strong>of</strong> monies due amountingto Rs. 11,961 with interest @ 12% p.a.towards debit balance in the account.Civil suit filed by Central Bank <strong>of</strong>India against CAPL for recovery <strong>of</strong> Rs.1,700,000 against a fake dem<strong>and</strong> draftsubmitted by CAPL which in turn w<strong>as</strong>received by it from a purch<strong>as</strong>er <strong>of</strong>vehicle.StatusPending.*Reply <strong>of</strong>governmentawaited.Pending. *Reply <strong>of</strong>governmentawaited.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*6. GM, CAPL vs.Amar BahadurSingh7. GM, Telco &CAPL vs.Motilal Gupta2008 MPSCDRC,Bhopal2008 MPSCDRC,BhopalConsumerDisputeConsumerDisputeRs. 25,700Monetarycompensation<strong>of</strong> Rs. 500 perday <strong>and</strong>compensation<strong>of</strong> Rs. 100,000Suit w<strong>as</strong> dismissed with costs. CAPLh<strong>as</strong> filed an execution application forRs. 37,515 <strong>as</strong> costs.A civil c<strong>as</strong>e h<strong>as</strong> been filed by Mr.Amar Bahadur Singh against CAPL formanufacturing defect in the engine.Order w<strong>as</strong> p<strong>as</strong>sed by the DistrictConsumer Forum in favour <strong>of</strong> Mr.Amar Bahadur Singh to repair thevehicle free <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>and</strong> to pay acompensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 25,000 along withRs. 500 <strong>as</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> litigation. An appealh<strong>as</strong> been filed against the above order.Mr. Moti Lal Gupta had filed a civilc<strong>as</strong>e against Telco claimingreplacement <strong>of</strong> the old vehicle with anew one along with monetarycompensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 500 per day <strong>and</strong>compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 100,000 forPending.*Pending*Both theappeals havebeenconsolidated.210


S.No.Cause Title8. CAPL vs. Ms.Sheela SinghDate <strong>of</strong>FilingSeptember15, 2008ForumMPSCDRC,BhopalNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eConsumerDisputeMonetaryamount,injunctionor otherremedyclaimedtowardsmental agony<strong>and</strong> Rs. 500 <strong>as</strong>cost <strong>of</strong>litigationRs. 55,000 <strong>as</strong>compensationwith interestat 10% p.a.<strong>and</strong> cost <strong>of</strong>litigationamounting toRs. 1,000.Summarymental agony suffered. The DistrictConsumer Forum, Rewa p<strong>as</strong>sed anorder in favour <strong>of</strong> Mr. Moti Lal Gupta(c<strong>as</strong>e no 283/2004) to change thech<strong>as</strong>sis free <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>and</strong> if the ch<strong>as</strong>sish<strong>as</strong> been replaced by the complainanthimself, to pay him the cost <strong>of</strong> thech<strong>as</strong>sis <strong>as</strong> prevailing on January 2004along with compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 45,000<strong>and</strong> Rs. 500 <strong>as</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> litigation. Hencean appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filed (appeal no.1460/2008). The complainant h<strong>as</strong> als<strong>of</strong>iled an appeal (c<strong>as</strong>e no.1131/2008)A civil c<strong>as</strong>e h<strong>as</strong> been filed by Ms.Sheela Singh against CAPL before theDistrict Consumer Forum, Sidhiclaiming replacement <strong>of</strong> the engine orreplacement <strong>of</strong> the disputed vehiclewith a new one.An order h<strong>as</strong> been p<strong>as</strong>sed in favour <strong>of</strong>Ms. Sheela Singh on August 30, 2008to change the pump within 30 daysalong with the compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs.55,000 with interest at 10% p.a. <strong>and</strong>Rs. 1,000 <strong>as</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> litigation.StatusPending.Both appealshave beenconsolidated<strong>and</strong> are fixed forfinal hearing onDecember 04,2010.9. CAPL vs. Mr.AwadeshSinghaniaMay 22,2009MPSCDRC,BhopalConsumerDisputeClaimAmountRs. 20,000plus cost <strong>of</strong>litigation.An appeal h<strong>as</strong> been filed (appeal no.2679/2808) by CAPL against the saidorder. Complainant h<strong>as</strong> also filed anappeal (c<strong>as</strong>e no.2363/2008).A civil c<strong>as</strong>e h<strong>as</strong> been filed by Mr.Awadesh Singania against CAPL forexcess smoke emission <strong>and</strong> nonfunctioning <strong>of</strong> fuel pumps, claimingrepair <strong>and</strong> refund <strong>of</strong> Rs. 10,286 alongwith compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 20,000 formental agony.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 09,2010.An order h<strong>as</strong> been p<strong>as</strong>sed by theDistrict Consumer Forum directingCAPL to refund a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs. 9,500with interest at 9% p.a. within 30 days.10. CAPL vs. Mr.YogeshChaudharyJanuary 6,2010MPSCDRC,BhopalConsumerDisputeRs. 115,500plus cost <strong>of</strong>litigation.Hence present appeal is filed beforethe State commission.A civil suit w<strong>as</strong> filed by Mr. YogeshChaudhary against CAPL for repair <strong>of</strong>the vehicle or replacement <strong>of</strong> thevehicle <strong>and</strong> a compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs.115,500 along with the cost <strong>of</strong>litigation.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -December 16,2010.11. CAPLvs. M/s Ak<strong>as</strong>hJanuary 3,2008Court <strong>of</strong>JudicialCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eRs. 13,980The order dated December 7, 2009w<strong>as</strong> p<strong>as</strong>sed in favour <strong>of</strong> Mr. YogeshChaudhary by the District ConsumerForum, Damoh directing repair <strong>of</strong> thevehicle within a period <strong>of</strong> one month<strong>and</strong> compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 4,000 alongwith costs <strong>of</strong> litigation. Hence theappeal h<strong>as</strong> been filed before the Statecommission.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>Pending.211


S.No.Cause TitleAutomobilesDindori12. CAPL vs. Mr.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Bihari13. CAPL vs. Mr.DeepakShriv<strong>as</strong>tata14. CAPL vs. Mr.Nilimesh Khare15. CAPL vs. Mr.Heera LalJaiswal16. CAPL vs. Mr.Pradeep Tiwari17 CAPL vs. Mr.RajeshCh<strong>and</strong>wani18. CAPL vs. Mr.Bimla Dutta19. CAPL vs. Mr.Hari DeenGupta20. CAPL vs. Mr.Dinesh KumarChoubey21. CAPL vs. Ms.Sushila Bai22. CAPL vs. M/sBiswanathPatnaikDate <strong>of</strong>FilingJanuary 16,2008July 22,2008March 29,2008September27, 2008December10, 2007January 29,2008July 27,2007February 15,2007September27, 2008July 27,2007November28, 2005ForumMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFiNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamount,injunctionor otherremedyclaimedRs. 115,499Rs. 51,000Rs. 10,000Rs. 100,000Rs. 38,500Rs. 29,310Rs. 82,555Rs. 17,769Rs. 150,000Rs. 66,700Rs. 800,000Summarycheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.StatusNext date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 26,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -January 27,2011.Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 02,2010.Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 25,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -December 06,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 15,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 26,2010.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*212


S.No.Cause Title23. CAPL vs. Mr.J<strong>as</strong>pal Singh24. CAPL vs. Mr.Digpal Singh25. CAPL vs. SonuAutomobiles26. CAPL vs. Mr.Mahadeo Pr<strong>as</strong>adGovind Ram27. CAPL vs. Mr.Hemant SinghBaghel28. CAPL vs. M/sUm<strong>as</strong>hriConstruction29. CAPL vs. M/sSonuAutomobiles30. CAPL vs. Mr.Ram MuratYadav31. CAPL vs. Mr.Shiekh Aliy<strong>as</strong>32. CAPL vs. Mr.Narendra singh33. CAPL vs. Mr.Yogesh P<strong>and</strong>eyDate <strong>of</strong>FilingNovember15, 2007December19, 2008May 9, 2008February 26,2007April 24,2008December10, 2008May 9, 2008March 1,2008August 13,2007April 15,2005October 12,2007Forumrst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamount,injunctionor otherremedyclaimedRs. 7,500Rs. 31,000Rs. 8,944Rs. 18,200Rs. 32,095Rs. 435,000Rs. 7,000Rs. 166,519Rs. 193,000Rs. 20,423Rs. 8,697SummaryCriminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.StatusPending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 15,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 20,2010.Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 22,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 06,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing –January 27,2011.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -December 06,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 13,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 26,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>213


S.No.Cause Title34. CAPL vs. Mr.Ashish Mishra35. CAPL vs. Mr.Ram Abhil<strong>as</strong>hDubey36. CAPL vs. Ms.Rajkumari37. CAPL vs. Mr.Daljeet Singh38. CAPL vs. Mr.Daljeet Singh39. CAPL vs. Mr.Daljeet Singh40. CAPL vs. Mr.Shiekh Aliy<strong>as</strong>41. CAPL vs. Mr.Kirti Yadav42. CAPL vs. Mr.Um<strong>as</strong>hankerPatel43. Mr. SardarNarendra Singhvs. MegammaFinance & Ors44. CAPL v.Bombay Motor45. CAPL v.Deepak SinghDate <strong>of</strong>FilingOctober 12,2008October 12,2008July 26,2008September 9,2002September 9,2002September 9,2002August 13,2007February 11,2010September5, 2009April 2,2008March 1,2008March 19,2010ForumFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurCourt <strong>of</strong>JudicialMagistrateFirst Cl<strong>as</strong>sJabalpurJMFC,JabalpurDJ, SagourHon'ble VIIIADJJabalpur(MP)JMFC,JabalpurJMFCNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamount,injunctionor otherremedyclaimedRs.42, 666Rs. 20,408Rs. 38,880Rs. 25,000Rs. 25,000Rs. 25,000Rs. 193,000SummaryCriminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Criminal Rs. 86,000 Criminal complaint under NegotiableInstruments Act alleging dishonour <strong>of</strong>cheque by respondent.Civil(DecreeExeution)CriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eCriminalC<strong>as</strong>eRs. 214,067Rs. 55,000Rs. 9,000Rs. 25,000Application h<strong>as</strong> been made seekingexecution <strong>of</strong> decree to recover Rs.214,067 against Mr. Um<strong>as</strong>hankerPatel towards vehicle recoverycharges.Complaint filed under section 138 <strong>of</strong>Negotiable Instruments Act fordishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque against Mr. S.Narendra Singh.Complaint filed under section 138 <strong>of</strong>Negotiable Instruments Act fordishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque.Complaint filed under section 138 <strong>of</strong>Negotiable Instruments Act fordishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque.Statushearing -October 25,2010.Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 26,2010Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 26,2010.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 30,2010.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -February 24,2011Pending.*Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -214


S.No.Cause TitleDate <strong>of</strong>Filing* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.ForumNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eMonetaryamount,injunctionor otherremedyclaimedSummaryStatusDecember 16,2010Shivam Motors Private Limited (“SMPL”)Sr.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/Court1. F.A. No. August 10, High Court140/092009<strong>of</strong>SMPL (Dr.ChattisgarhKail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta)vs. SantoshKumar Agrawal& State <strong>of</strong>Chhattisgarh2. C<strong>as</strong>e No.169/2010SMPL vs.BukhariAssociatesNovember 26,2009CJM, BSPNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eCivil SuitCriminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.MonetaryamountNot<strong>as</strong>certained.SummarySMPL h<strong>as</strong> filed first appeal forsetting <strong>as</strong>ide order dismissingSMPL’s counter claim in amatter involving tenant’srefusal to pay rent <strong>and</strong>allegation made by tenantregarding existence <strong>of</strong> anagreement to sell the propertyin question to the tenant.Rs. 150,000 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.StatusPending.*Pending.*Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 09,20103. C<strong>as</strong>e No.170/2010SMPL vs.BukhariAssociatesNovember 26,2009CJM, BSPCriminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.Rs. 97,491 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Pending.*Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 09,20104. C<strong>as</strong>e No.1385/09SMPL vs.AlvinBengamin5. C<strong>as</strong>e No.114/09SMPL vs.Jaini BaiNot <strong>as</strong>certained. CJM, BSP Criminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.September 11,2009CJM, BSPCriminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.Rs. 4,240 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 10,000 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Pending.*Pending.*Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -November 26,20106. C<strong>as</strong>e No.1063/09SMPL vs.Bermali P<strong>and</strong>aNot <strong>as</strong>certained. CJM, BSP Criminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.Rs.1,100,000Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Pending.*Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 19,20107. C<strong>as</strong>e No.1373/07SMPL vs.Mohd. TayabApril 12, 2007 CJM, BSP Criminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.Rs. 170,000 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Pending.*Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 18,20108. C<strong>as</strong>e No.350/09July 30, 2009 CJM, BSP Criminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>Rs. 24,173 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument ActPending.*215


Sr.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/CourtSMPL vs.Mahalaxmi9. C<strong>as</strong>e No.NR/05SMPL vs.Abrar AhmedNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>eaccused.March 18, 2005 CJM, BSP Criminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.MonetarySummaryamountalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 47,000 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.StatusPending.*Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing -October 18,201010. C<strong>as</strong>e No.1451/09SMPL vs.Sindhvani11. C<strong>as</strong>e No.639/09SMPL vs.Consul MoversKorba12. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 1036 /10SMPL vs.Manjeet SinghHora13. C<strong>as</strong>e No.10B/08SMPL vs.Ashok KumarJaiswalJuly 2009 CJM, BSP Criminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.April 5, 2009 CJM, Korba Criminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.June 18, 2010 CJM, BSP Criminalprosecution <strong>of</strong>accused.April 31, 2008* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited (“KAFL”)CivilJudge/BSPCivil suit forrecovery <strong>of</strong>dues.Sr.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/ Court Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e1. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 2006 Shri R.P. Criminal28242/06Mishra JMFC ProsecutionKAFL vs.JabalpurMr NarendraSingh2. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 2006 Shri R.P. Criminal28246/06Mishra JMFC ProsecutionKAFL vs.JabalpurMr NarendraSingh3. C<strong>as</strong>e No.5540/06KAFL vs.Mr NarendraSingh4. C<strong>as</strong>e No.5541/06KAFL vs.Mr NarendraSingh5. C<strong>as</strong>e No.20288/06KAFL vs.Kulbeer Singh6. C<strong>as</strong>e No.20290/06KAFL vs.Kulbeer Singh2006 Shri R.P.Mishra JMFCJabalpur2006 Shri R.P.Mishra JMFCJabalpur2006 Shri SantoshKol JMFCJabalpur2006 Shri SantoshKol JMFCJabalpurCriminalProsecutionCriminalProsecutionCriminalProsecutionCriminalProsecutionRs. 120,700 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 245,000 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 161,376 Criminal complaint underNegotiable Instrument Actalleging dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 373,939 Civil suit filed by SMPLagainst Mr. Ashok KumarJaiswal for recovery <strong>of</strong> duestowards repair vehiclesMonetarySummaryamountRs. 100,000 Criminal complaint filedunder section 138 <strong>of</strong> NIAfor dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 125,000 Criminal complaint filedunder section 138 <strong>of</strong> NIAfor dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 50,000 Criminal complaint filedunder section 138 <strong>of</strong> NIAfor dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 75,000 Criminal complaint filedunder section 138 <strong>of</strong> NIAfor dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 30,000 Criminal complaint filedunder section 138 <strong>of</strong> NIAfor dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 36,000 Criminal complaint filedunder section 138 <strong>of</strong> NIAfor dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Next date <strong>of</strong>hearing –October 18,2010Pending.Publication <strong>of</strong>noticescheduled onSeptember 16,2010 <strong>as</strong> party isavoiding notice.StatusPending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*216


Sr.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/ Court Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e7. C<strong>as</strong>e No. 2004 Sanjay Sahi Criminal27323/2004JMFC ProsecutionKAFL vs.JabalpurJyotshanaMahapatra8. Execution C<strong>as</strong>e 1998 City Civil ExecutionNo. 804/1998Judge at ProceedingsKail<strong>as</strong>h AutoBangaloreFinance Ltd. vs.Fayaz p<strong>as</strong>ha<strong>and</strong> others9. Execution C<strong>as</strong>e 1998 City Civil ExecutionNo. 806/1998Judge at ProceedingsKail<strong>as</strong>h AutoBangaloreFinance Ltd. vs.Fayaz p<strong>as</strong>ha<strong>and</strong> others10 Execution C<strong>as</strong>e 1998 City Civil ExecutionNo. 807/1998Judge at ProceedingsKail<strong>as</strong>h AutoBangaloreFinance Ltd. vs.Fayaz p<strong>as</strong>ha<strong>and</strong> others11. Execution C<strong>as</strong>e 1998 City Civil ExecutionNo. 808/1998Judge at ProceedingsKail<strong>as</strong>h AutoBangaloreFinance Ltd. vs.Fayaz p<strong>as</strong>ha<strong>and</strong> others12. FD C<strong>as</strong>e No. 2007HubliExecution38/07 Kail<strong>as</strong>hProceedingsAuto FinanceLtd. vs. RamDutta Builders13. Execution C<strong>as</strong>e 2007 Hubli ExecutionNo.339/07ProceedingsKail<strong>as</strong>h AutoFinance Ltd. vs.Ram DuttaBuilders* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.Kail<strong>as</strong>h Motors Finance Private Limited (“KMFL”)MonetarySummaryamountRs. 384,898 Criminal complaint filedunder section 138 <strong>of</strong> NIAfor dishonour <strong>of</strong> cheque byrespondent.Rs. 496,332Rs. 496,332Rs. 496,332Rs. 496,332Rs. 970,748Rs. 1,036,700Execution application filedfor recovery <strong>of</strong> decreetalamount Rs. 4 96,332.Execution application filedfor recovery <strong>of</strong> decreetalamount Rs. 496,332.Execution application filedfor recovery <strong>of</strong> decreetalamount Rs. 496,332.Execution application filedfor recovery <strong>of</strong> decreetalamount Rs. 496,332.Execution application filedfor recovery <strong>of</strong> decreetalamount Rs. 970,748.Execution application filedfor recovery <strong>of</strong> decreetalamount Rs. 1,036,700.StatusPending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Pending.*Sr.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> filing Forum/CourtNature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e1. KMFL vs. M/s. 2004 CJM ExecutionRamaProceedingsAutomobiles &another* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.MonetaryamountRs.964,913with interestSummaryExecution proceedings forrecovery <strong>of</strong> amount notdecreed in favour <strong>of</strong>appellant.StatusPending.*Commercial InstalmentS.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> Filing Forum Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e1. CIJ vs. State <strong>of</strong>M. P.January 29, 2008AdditionalCollector,JabalpurCivilMonetary amount,injunction or otherremedy claimedTransfer <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> fromGovernmentSummarySuit filed byCommercialInstalment seekingtransfer <strong>of</strong>government l<strong>and</strong>situated at villageGhana (areaapproximately 1,970hectares)StatusPending forsending reportto the relevantgovernmentalauthority bythe AdditionalCollector.217


Commercial Body BuildersS.No.Cause Title Date <strong>of</strong> Filing Forum Nature <strong>of</strong>C<strong>as</strong>e1. CBB vs. DeepakAroraDecember 15,2004* Next date <strong>of</strong> hearing yet to be notified.12 th ADJ,JabalpurExecutionproceedingsMonetaryamount,injunction orother remedyclaimedRs. 159,357SummaryWe have filedapplication forrecovery <strong>of</strong>decreedamount.StatusPending.*There are no litigations or defaults by any companies with which the <strong>Promoters</strong> were <strong>as</strong>sociated in the p<strong>as</strong>t wherethe names <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Promoters</strong> have not been deleted from the pending litigations or other proceedings:There are no adverse findings against the <strong>Promoters</strong> <strong>as</strong> regards compliance with securities laws:<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> below, there are no adverse findings against the Group Companies <strong>as</strong> regards compliance withsecurities laws:The only listed Group Company <strong>of</strong> our promoters, Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto Finance Limited, had committed the followingviolations :1. Delay in payment <strong>of</strong> listing fees.2. Non appointment <strong>of</strong> Company Secretary.3. Delay in filing <strong>of</strong> quarterly compliances.4. Non appointment <strong>of</strong> registered transfer agent.5. Shares were not dematerialized.6. Delay in filing <strong>of</strong> requirements under SEBI (Substantial Acquisition <strong>of</strong> Shares <strong>and</strong> Takeovers) Regulations,1997.7. Delay in compliance with clause 41 <strong>of</strong> the listing agreement.8. Non-compliance with clause 49 <strong>of</strong> the listing agreement.9. Failure to make disclosures under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition <strong>of</strong> Shares <strong>and</strong> Takeovers) Regulations,199710. Failure to make disclosures under SEBI (Prohibition <strong>of</strong> Insider Trading Regulations), 1992For details, refer to the section “Risk Factors” beginning on page XIII <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.In respect <strong>of</strong> the above violations, the Company <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers responsible for its affairs are liable to fines <strong>of</strong> upto Rs.250 million for failure to comply with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the listing agreement with the BSE. The <strong>of</strong>ficers responsibleare also liable to imprisonment in this regard. Since no trading h<strong>as</strong> taken place in the equity shares <strong>of</strong> Kail<strong>as</strong>h AutoFinance Limited for more than six months, this may result in adverse consequences for Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto FinanceLimited in terms <strong>of</strong> the SCRR.<strong>Except</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> below, no penalties have been imposed on the <strong>Promoters</strong> by any governmental authority or court:A penalty <strong>of</strong> Rs. 21,000 h<strong>as</strong> been imposed by the Court <strong>of</strong> Chief Judicial Magistrate, M<strong>and</strong>la, Madhya Pradeshagainst Dr. Kail<strong>as</strong>h Gupta, Promoter Director <strong>of</strong> the Company, <strong>as</strong> occupier under the Factories Act <strong>and</strong> Mr.Abhishek Jaiswal <strong>as</strong> personnel manager <strong>of</strong> the Company, due to a contravention by the Company <strong>of</strong> provisions forsafety <strong>and</strong> welfare <strong>of</strong> workmen under the Factories Act, 1948 <strong>and</strong> the Madhya Pradesh Factories Rules, 1962 leadingto death <strong>of</strong> a workman at the M<strong>and</strong>la Factory premises.No penalties have been imposed on Group Companies by any governmental authority or court:There are no outst<strong>and</strong>ing statutory dues on the part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Promoters</strong>:218


There are no outst<strong>and</strong>ing statutory dues on the part <strong>of</strong> Group Companies:There are no p<strong>as</strong>t c<strong>as</strong>es in which the <strong>Promoters</strong> have been found guilty <strong>of</strong> economic or other <strong>of</strong>fences:There are no p<strong>as</strong>t c<strong>as</strong>es in which Group Companies have been found guilty <strong>of</strong> economic or other <strong>of</strong>fences:Neither SEBI, nor any stock exchanges have taken any disciplinary action against the <strong>Promoters</strong>:Neither SEBI, nor any stock exchanges have taken any disciplinary action against Group Companies:The <strong>Promoters</strong> have not defaulted in any obligations towards any financial institutions or banks:The Group Companies have not defaulted in any obligations towards any financial institutions or banks:The <strong>Promoters</strong> have not defaulted in dues towards holders <strong>of</strong> any debt-instruments, fixed deposits or preferenceshares <strong>of</strong> or with the CompanyThe Group Companies have not defaulted in dues towards holders <strong>of</strong> any debt-instruments, fixed deposits orpreference shares.Note on entries under “Liability/Amount under Consideration” in this sectionAll entries under the heading “Amount under Consideration” in the tables presented above are estimates only <strong>and</strong>are made on the b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> the issues in dispute. The actual monetary, criminal or other liability when the outst<strong>and</strong>inglitigation is finally decided by the court, tribunal or other authority before which the matter is pending may be moreor less than that <strong>stated</strong> under this head.Material Developments since the L<strong>as</strong>t Balance Sheet DateIn the opinion <strong>of</strong> the Board, other than <strong>as</strong> disclosed in this Prospectus, there h<strong>as</strong> not arisen, since the date <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>as</strong>tfinancial statements set out herein, any circumstance that materially or adversely affects our pr<strong>of</strong>itability or the value<strong>of</strong> our <strong>as</strong>sets or our ability to pay our material liabilities over the next twelve months.219


GOVERNMENT AND OTHER APPROVALSOn the b<strong>as</strong>is <strong>of</strong> the indicative list <strong>of</strong> approvals provided below, the Company can undertake this Issue <strong>and</strong> its currentbusiness activities <strong>and</strong>, except <strong>as</strong> <strong>stated</strong> below, no additional major approvals from any Government or regulatoryauthority, including the RBI, are required to undertake the Issue or continue these activities. Unless otherwise<strong>stated</strong>, these approvals are valid <strong>as</strong> <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.Approvals for the IssueThe following approvals have been obtained or will be obtained in connection with the Issue:The Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company h<strong>as</strong>, pursuant to resolutions p<strong>as</strong>sed at its meetings held on January 10, 2010authorized the Fresh Issue subject to the approval by the shareholders <strong>of</strong> the Company under Section 81(1A) <strong>of</strong> theCompanies Act, <strong>and</strong> such other authorities <strong>as</strong> may be necessary. The shareholders <strong>of</strong> the Company have, pursuant toresolutions dated March 18, 2010 p<strong>as</strong>sed at their extraordinary general meeting under Section 81(1A) <strong>of</strong> theCompanies Act, authorized the Fresh Issue. The Board h<strong>as</strong> approved <strong>and</strong> authorized this Prospectus pursuant to itsresolution dated March 29, 2010.The Company h<strong>as</strong> obtained in-principle listing approvals dated June 15, 2010 <strong>and</strong> June 3, 2010 from the NSE <strong>and</strong>BSE respectively.The Company h<strong>as</strong> also obtained necessary contractual approvals required for the Issue. For further information, seethe section “Government <strong>and</strong> Other Approvals” beginning on page 220 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.The Offer for Sale h<strong>as</strong> been authorized <strong>as</strong> follows:(a) in respect <strong>of</strong> 1,285,101 Equity Shares included in the Offer for Sale, by NYLIM pursuant to a resolution <strong>of</strong> itsBoard <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> dated March 2, 2010;(b) in respect <strong>of</strong> 243,486 Equity Shares included in the Offer for Sale, by Commercial Automobiles pursuant to aresolution <strong>of</strong> its Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> dated March 19, 2010.The Company <strong>and</strong> the Selling Shareholders have obtained an approval from the RBI dated June 8, 2010 in respect <strong>of</strong>the <strong>of</strong>fer in this Issue <strong>of</strong> the Equity Shares included in the Offer for Sale.Approvals for the BusinessWe require various approvals to carry on our business in India. Set forth below is a brief summary <strong>of</strong> approvalsobtained by us for our business. It may be noted that some <strong>of</strong> these approvals require annual renewal. Where ourapplications for renewal are pending, there can be no guarantee that renewals will be granted on the terms <strong>of</strong> theoriginal approval or at all. In addition, the relevant authorities may impose conditions on the renewal <strong>of</strong> approvalsthat may impose new or enhanced limitations on the production capacity, manufacturing processes, number <strong>of</strong>persons employed or engaged <strong>as</strong> contract labour or motive power used at the relevant factory.The approvals that we require include the following:Approvals for Richhai Factory INo./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/RemarksFactory License under the MadhyaPradesh Factories Rules, 1962 under theFactories Act, 1948No. 7/07849/jbp/2miChief Inspector <strong>of</strong>Factories,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya Pradesh.January 27, 2009Subject to approval <strong>of</strong> renewal applicationdated November 25, 2009 filed by theCompany.The license is subject to the followingconditions:Maximum number <strong>of</strong> workers to be engaged220


No./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/Remarksat the factory per day: 500Sanction <strong>of</strong> Building PlanRegistration under Contract Labour(Regulation <strong>and</strong> Abolition) Act, 1970Registration No.:87/CL/JBP/84Approval under Indian Electricity Rules,2003 issued under the Electricity Act,2003 to Operate Diesel GeneratorsLetter No.:L.N.T./722/S.E.Environmental ClearancesConsent to Operate under Water(Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act,1974No. EI/Jabalpur/2008/MPPCB 69/127Chief Inspector <strong>of</strong>Factories <strong>and</strong>Gram PanchayatLicensing Officer,RegisteringAuthority,Jabalpur Division,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshSuperintendingEngineer(Electricity Safety)& Deputy ChiefElectricityInspector,Government, <strong>of</strong>Madhya Pradesh,Madhya PradeshPollution ControlBoard,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshGranted by ChiefInspector <strong>of</strong>Factories on June1, 2007 <strong>and</strong> GramPanchayat on May14, 2007December 13,1984August 12, 2008September 9, 2008Maximum installed motive power permittedfor manufacturing process: 250 Horse PowerThe license permits the Company toundertake the business <strong>of</strong> ‘body fabrication’.Maximum number <strong>of</strong> contract labourers to beengaged at the factory: 45Approval granted for using diesel generator<strong>of</strong> 1x500 K.V.A. 33/.433 K. V.Subject to approval <strong>of</strong> renewal applicationdated November 13, 2009 filed by theCompany.The clearance is for the following products tobe manufactured in not more than thefollowing numbers:• Tippers <strong>and</strong> Trucks - 3000 per year• Trailer Bodies - 50 per year• Water Browser <strong>and</strong> Water Tankers –400 per year• Load Bodies - 300 per year• Light Recovery Vehicles – 40 per year• Car Carriers – 5 per year• Short Hood, Long Hood, Cabin forDiesel Locomotive Works - 100 peryear.Consent to Operate under Air (Prevention& Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act, 1981No. 7714/TS/MPPCB/2008Madhya PradeshPollution ControlBoard,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshSeptember 11,2008Subject to approval <strong>of</strong> renewal applicationdated November 13, 2009 filed by theCompany.The clearance is for the following products tobe manufactured in not more than thefollowing numbers:• Tippers <strong>and</strong> Trucks - 3000 per year• Trailer Bodies - 50 per year• Water Browser <strong>and</strong> Water Tankers –400 per year• Load Bodies - 300 per year• Light Recovery Vehicles – 40 per year• Car Carriers – 5 per year• Short Hood, Long Hood, Cabin forDiesel Locomotive Works - 100 peryear.Authorisation under Hazardous W<strong>as</strong>teMadhya PradeshPollution ControlApril 19, 2010The authorisation will be in force for a period221


No./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/Remarks(Management, H<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> TransboundaryMovement) Rules, 2008No. 761/HSMD/MPPCB/JJ-08/2010Tax RegistrationsRegistration under Finance Act, 1994 forService TaxNo. AAACC5823EST002Registration under Central Excise Rules,2002 issued under the Central Excise Act,1944 for Central ExciseNo. AAACC5823EXM001Board,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshOffice <strong>of</strong> theAssistantCommissionerCustoms &Central ExciseOffice <strong>of</strong> theSuperintendent <strong>of</strong>Central ExciseAugust 24, 2009Not available<strong>of</strong> 5 years from November 16, 2007.The authorisation h<strong>as</strong> been granted to theCompany to operate a facility for collection,reception, treatment, storage, transport <strong>and</strong>disposal <strong>of</strong> hazardous w<strong>as</strong>te.Approvals Required but not Obtained for Richhai Factory IThe Company h<strong>as</strong> not amended its registration certificate granted under Contract Labour (Regulation <strong>and</strong> Abolition) Act, 1970 to reflect latestnumber <strong>of</strong> contract labour engaged which could expose the Company <strong>and</strong> every person in charge <strong>of</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> its business to imprisonment orfine or both.Pending Applications for Approval or Renewal for Richhai Factory IThe Company is currently awaiting the following approvals <strong>and</strong> renewals. There can be no guarantee that these approvals will be granted on theterms applied for or at all. In addition, the relevant authorities may impose conditions on the grant <strong>of</strong> such approvals that may impose limitationson the production capacity, manufacturing processes applied, number <strong>of</strong> persons employed or motive power used at Richhai Factory I:1. approval under Hazardous W<strong>as</strong>te (Management, H<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008.2. renewal <strong>of</strong> approval under Madhya Pradesh Factories Rules, 1962 read with Factories Act, 1948.3. renewal <strong>of</strong> consent to operate under Water (Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act, 1974.4. renewal <strong>of</strong> consent to operate under Air (Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act, 1981.Approvals for M<strong>and</strong>la FactoryNo./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/RemarksFactory License under the Madhya PradeshFactories Rules, 1962 under the FactoriesAct, 1948Registration No: 129/08582/MDL/2m(i) –2010Chief Inspector <strong>of</strong>Factories,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshMarch 10, 2010The license is subject to the followingconditions:Maximum number <strong>of</strong> workers to be engaged atthe factory per day: 500Maximum installed motive power permittedfor manufacturing process: 500 Horse PowerSanction <strong>of</strong> Building PlanRegistration under Contract Labour(Regulation <strong>and</strong> Abolition) Act, 1970Registration No.:118/MDC/CL/05Approval under Indian Electricity Rules,2003 issued under the Electricity Act, 2003to Operate Diesel GeneratorsLetter No.:Chief Inspector <strong>of</strong>Factories <strong>and</strong>Gram PanchayatLicensing Officer,RegisteringAuthority, Subdivision- M<strong>and</strong>la,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshSuperintendingEngineer(Electricity Safety)& Deputy ChiefGranted by ChiefInspector <strong>of</strong>Factories on June1, 2006. Date onwhich sanctiongranted by GramPanchayat notmentioned.September 3, 2005May 11, 2009The license permits the Company to undertakethe business <strong>of</strong> ‘engineering <strong>and</strong> fabrication’.Maximum number <strong>of</strong> contract labourers to beengaged at the factory: 250Approval granted for using alternator <strong>of</strong>Crompton Greaves make with engine number13071260094 in place <strong>of</strong> diesel generator <strong>of</strong>1x500 K.V.A. 415 volts222


No./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/RemarksT./157/S.E.Environmental ClearancesConsent to Operate under Water(Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act,1974No: 801/TS/MPPCB/2010Consent to Operate under Air (Prevention& Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act, 1981No: 803/TS/MPPCB/2010ElectricityInspector,Government, <strong>of</strong>Madhya Pradesh.Madhya PradeshPollution ControlBoard,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshMadhya PradeshPollution ControlBoard,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshJanuary 29, 2010 Valid till September 30, 2010.The clearance is for the following products tobe manufactured in not more than thefollowing numbers:• Trucks <strong>and</strong> Trippers - 575 per year.January 29, 2010 Valid till September 30, 2010.The clearance is for the following products tobe manufactured in not more than thefollowing numbers:Tax RegistrationsRegistration under Finance Act, 1994 forService TaxService Tax Registration No.:GTA/512/CEBBCOUT-II/R-III/06Registration under Central Excise Rules,2002 issued under the Central Excise Act,1944 for Central ExciseRegistration No.: AAACC5823EXM002Office <strong>of</strong> theSuperintendentCustoms &Central ExciseOffice <strong>of</strong> theDeputyCommissioner/AssistantCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Central ExciseMarch 8, 2006May 16, 2005• Trucks <strong>and</strong> Trippers - 575 per yearPending Applications for Approval for M<strong>and</strong>la FactoryThe Company is currently awaiting the following approvals <strong>and</strong> renewals. There can be no guarantee that these approvals will be granted on theterms applied for or at all. In addition, the relevant authorities may impose conditions on the grant <strong>of</strong> such approvals that may impose limitationson the production capacity, manufacturing processes applied, number <strong>of</strong> persons employed or motive power used at the M<strong>and</strong>la Factory:1. renewal <strong>of</strong> approval under Madhya Pradesh Factories Rules, 1962 read with Factories Act, 1948..2. renewal <strong>of</strong> approval under Hazardous W<strong>as</strong>te (Management, H<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008.Approvals for Indore FactoryNo./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/RemarksFactory License under the MadhyaPradesh Factories Rules, 1962 under theFactories Act, 1948No: 10/13646/DHR/2m(i)Chief Inspector OfFactories,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshApril 24, 2010The license is subject to the followingconditions:Maximum number <strong>of</strong> workers to be engaged atthe factory per day: 100Maximum installed motive power permittedfor manufacturing process: 500 Horse PowerSanction <strong>of</strong> Building PlanRegistration under Contract Labour(Regulation <strong>and</strong> Abolition) Act, 1970Registration No.:106/PTR/2008Approval under Indian ElectricityRules, 2003 issued under the ElectricityAct, 2003 to Operate Diesel GeneratorSet <strong>and</strong> AlternatorChief Inspector <strong>of</strong>FactoriesLicensing Officer,Registering Authority,Sub-division -M<strong>and</strong>la, Government<strong>of</strong> Madhya PradeshSuperintendingEngineer (ElectricitySafety) & DeputyChief ElectricityGranted by ChiefInspector <strong>of</strong>Factories onDecember 15,2008Date notmentionedMarch 3, 2009The license permits the Company to undertakethe business <strong>of</strong> body building.Maximum number <strong>of</strong> contract labourers to beengaged at the factory: 7Approval granted for using diesel generator <strong>of</strong>1x320 K.V.A. along with an alternator.223


No./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/RemarksLetter No.:Tec./1990/S.E.Environmental ClearancesConsent to Establish under Air(Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act,1981 <strong>and</strong> Water (Prevention & Control<strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act, 1974)No. 226/TS/MPPCB/2008Inspector,Government, <strong>of</strong>Madhya Pradesh.Madhya PradeshPollution ControlBoard, Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshJanuary 12, 2009This approval is valid for the followingproducts <strong>and</strong> production capacity:Tipper Body, Truck Body, Load Body, TrailerBody <strong>and</strong> Bus Body - 4000 per yearTax RegistrationsRegistration under Central ExciseRules, 2002 issued under the CentralExcise Act, 1944 for Central ExciseRegistration No.: AAACC5823EXM003Office <strong>of</strong> the AssistantCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Central ExciseNovember 11,2008Approvals Required but not Obtained for Indore FactoryThe Company h<strong>as</strong> not obtained a registration certificate under Contract Labour (Regulation <strong>and</strong> Abolition) Act, 1970 for engaging contract labourwhich could expose the Company <strong>and</strong> every person in charge <strong>of</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> its business to imprisonment or fine or both.Pending Applications for Approval for Indore FactoryThe Company is currently awaiting the following approvals <strong>and</strong> renewals. There can be no guarantee that these approvals will be granted on theterms applied for or at all. In addition, the relevant authorities may impose conditions on the grant <strong>of</strong> such approvals that may impose limitationson the production capacity, manufacturing processes applied, number <strong>of</strong> persons employed or motive power used at the Indore Factory:1. renewal <strong>of</strong> approval under Madhya Pradesh Factories Rules, 1962 read with Factories Act, 19482. consent to operate under Air (Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act, 1981 <strong>and</strong> Water (Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act, 1974)3. approval under the Hazardous W<strong>as</strong>te (Management, H<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008Approvals for Richhai Factory IINo./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/RemarksFactory License under the MadhyaPradesh Factories Rules, 1962 under theFactories Act, 1948No: 122/13551/JBP/2miChief Inspector OfFactories,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshJanuary 22, 2010 Valid till December 31, 2010.The license is subject to the followingconditions:Maximum number <strong>of</strong> workers to be engaged atthe factory per day: 100Maximum installed motive power permittedfor manufacturing process: 100 KVA - 250Horse Power.Sanction <strong>of</strong> Building PlanApproval under Indian ElectricityRules, 2003 issued under the ElectricityAct, 2003 to Operate Diesel GeneratorLetter No.:T/765Tax RegistrationsRegistration under Central ExciseRules, 2002 issued under the CentralChief Inspector <strong>of</strong>Factories <strong>and</strong> GramPanchayatSuperintendingEngineer (ElectricitySafety) & DeputyChief ElectricityInspector,Government, <strong>of</strong>Madhya Pradesh.Office <strong>of</strong> the DeputyCommissioner/Granted by ChiefInspector <strong>of</strong>Factories onOctober 17, 2008<strong>and</strong> GramPanchayat onOctober 2, 2009August 20, 2008November 17,2008Approval granted for using diesel generator <strong>of</strong>1x315 K.V.A.224


No./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/RemarksExcise Act, 1944 for Central ExciseRegistration No.: AAACC5823EXM004AssistantCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Central ExciseApprovals Required but not Obtained for Richhai Factory IIThe Company h<strong>as</strong> not obtained the following approvals <strong>and</strong> licenses:1. a registration certificate under Contract Labour (Regulation <strong>and</strong> Abolition) Act, 1970 for engaging contract labour which could exposethe Company <strong>and</strong> every person in charge <strong>of</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> its business to imprisonment or fine or both.2. consent to operate under the Air (Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act, 1981 <strong>and</strong> Water (Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act,1974 which could expose the Company <strong>and</strong> every person in charge <strong>of</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> its business to imprisonment or fine or both.3. consent under the Hazardous W<strong>as</strong>te (Management, H<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008 which could expose theCompany <strong>and</strong> every person in charge <strong>of</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> its business to imprisonment or fine or both.Approvals for Jamshedpur FactoryNo./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/RemarksSanction <strong>of</strong> Building PlanApproval for Electricity SupplyLetter No.: PBD/PSK/146/09/09-10Registration under Contract Labour(Regulation <strong>and</strong> Abolition) Act, 1970Registration No.:160/154Managing Director,Adityapur IndustrialArea DevelopmentAuthorityChief Engineer <strong>and</strong>Commercial PowerServices Division,Jamshedpur Utilities<strong>and</strong> ServicesCompany LimitedLicensing Officer,Registering Authority,Jamshedpur Division,Government <strong>of</strong>Madhya PradeshGranted by theAdityapurIndustrial AreaDevelopmentAuthority onDecember 6, 2007October 1, 2009October 21, 2009Mithila Motors, with whom the Companyjointly operates the Jamshedpur Factorypursuant to the Joint Project Agreement, h<strong>as</strong>been allotted a capacity <strong>of</strong> 200 KVA for theJamshedpur Factory.The license permits the Company to undertakethe business <strong>of</strong> fabrication, erection,mechanical, electrical <strong>and</strong> civil heat treatment,welding, painting, shot bl<strong>as</strong>ting, housekeeping,painting, loading <strong>and</strong> unloading.Registration under Jharkh<strong>and</strong> Shops<strong>and</strong> Establishments Act, 1954Tax RegistrationsRegistration under Central ExciseRules, 2002 issued under the CentralExcise Act, 1944 for Central ExciseRegistration No.: AAACC5823EXM005Registration under Finance Act, 1994for Service TaxService Tax Registration No.:AAACC5823EST003Shram AdhishakNarekshiOffice <strong>of</strong> the AssistantCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Central ExciseOffice <strong>of</strong> theSuperintendentCustoms & CentralExciseMaximum number <strong>of</strong> contract labourers to beengaged at the factory: 200.October 26, 2009 Valid till: December 31, 2010.October 14, 2009October 16, 2009The registration permits the Company to onlyemploy up to 20 employees on any given day.Approvals Required but not Obtained for Jamshedpur FactoryThe Company h<strong>as</strong> not obtained a renewal <strong>of</strong> nor amended its registration certificate granted under Jharkh<strong>and</strong> Shops <strong>and</strong> Establishments Act, 1954to reflect latest number <strong>of</strong> contract labour engaged which could expose the Company <strong>and</strong> every person in charge <strong>of</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> its business toimprisonment or fine or both.Pending Applications for Approval for Jamshedpur Factory225


The Company is currently awaiting the following approvals <strong>and</strong> renewals. There can be no guarantee that these approvals will be granted on theterms applied for or at all. In addition, the relevant authorities may impose conditions on the grant <strong>of</strong> such approvals that may impose limitationson the production capacity, manufacturing processes applied, number <strong>of</strong> persons employed or motive power used at the Jamshedpur Factory:1. For grant <strong>of</strong> factory license under the Factories Act, 1948, for which Company h<strong>as</strong> filed an application dated December 11, 2009under Factories Act, 1948.2. For grant <strong>of</strong> consent to operate under the Air (Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong> Pollution) Act, 1981 <strong>and</strong> Water (Prevention & Control <strong>of</strong>Pollution) Act, 1974.Other approvals obtained by the CompanyNo./Description <strong>of</strong> Permit/License Issuing Authority Date Comments/RemarksRegistration under MadhyaPradesh VAT Rules, 2002 issuedunder the Madhya Pradesh VATAct, 2002 for Value Added TaxNumber: 23296001778Registration under Central SalesTax (Registration <strong>and</strong> Turnover)Rules, 1957 issued under the SalesTax Act, 1956 for Central SalesTaxNumber: 23296001778Registration under Jharkh<strong>and</strong>Value Added Tax Act, 2005 forValue Added TaxNumber: 20090905684Certificate <strong>of</strong> Importer-ExporterCodeRegistration Certificate forManufacturerRegistration No.:DGS&D/REGN/KAN/S-30/04/CControllerate <strong>of</strong> QualityAssurance (Vehicles)Registration No.: CQAV/CAR/C-157/QAV-6Vanijeyak KarAdhikariVanijeyak KarAdhikariDeputyCommissioner <strong>of</strong>Commercial Tax,JamshedpurDirectorate General<strong>of</strong> Foreign Trade,Ministry <strong>of</strong>Commerce,Government <strong>of</strong> IndiaDirectorate General<strong>of</strong> Supplies <strong>and</strong>Disposals,Government <strong>of</strong> IndiaDirectorate General<strong>of</strong> QualityAssurance, Ministry<strong>of</strong> Defence,Government <strong>of</strong> IndiaGranted witheffect fromOctober 18, 1983Granted witheffect fromOctober 18, 1983December 30,2009April 15, 2004January 7, 2005 Valid till January 6, 2010.Renewal application dated December 31, 2009 ispending.March 18, 2009 Valid till March 17, 2012The Company h<strong>as</strong> been registered to manufacture thefollowing defence items in the following quantities:(a) Fabrication <strong>of</strong> Rear Bodies/Set <strong>of</strong> Panel for LoadBodies – 100 per month(b) Simple Pressed Fabricated Items for Cabins – 100 permonthIntegral Coach Factory, ChennaiLetter No.: MD/D/Vendor/60/XLVResearch Designs & St<strong>and</strong>ardsOrganisationLetter No.: MW/BOXNR/QAPOffice <strong>of</strong> theCDE/Mech,Ministry <strong>of</strong>Railways,Government <strong>of</strong> IndiaDirector General,Research Designs &St<strong>and</strong>ardsOrganisation,Ministry <strong>of</strong>Railways,Government <strong>of</strong> IndiaDecember 4,2009December 11,2009(c) Special Body Building for Caravans - 5 per month;Ambulances - 5 per month; Light Recovery Vehicles - 5per month; Bus Bodies - 5 per monthThe manufacturing facilities <strong>of</strong> the Company have beencertified by the Integral Coach Factory, Chennai, aproduction unit <strong>of</strong> the Indian Railways, to be adequatefor the supply <strong>of</strong> Side-Walls, ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>as</strong>semblies <strong>and</strong> car linepillars for LHB Coaches.The Quality Assurance Plan submitted by the Companyh<strong>as</strong> been approved by the Research Designs & St<strong>and</strong>ardsOrganisation for fabrication <strong>of</strong> Side-Walls, End-Walls<strong>and</strong> flap doors <strong>of</strong> BOXNR Wagons.226


Authority for the Fresh IssueOTHER REGULATORY AND STATUTORY DISCLOSURESThe Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Company h<strong>as</strong>, pursuant to resolutions p<strong>as</strong>sed at its meetings held on January 10, 2010authorized the Fresh Issue subject to the approval by the shareholders <strong>of</strong> the Company under Section 81(1A) <strong>of</strong> theCompanies Act, <strong>and</strong> such other authorities <strong>as</strong> may be necessary. The shareholders <strong>of</strong> the Company have, pursuant toresolutions dated March 18, 2010 p<strong>as</strong>sed at their extraordinary general meeting under Section 81(1A) <strong>of</strong> theCompanies Act, authorized the Fresh Issue.The Company h<strong>as</strong> also obtained all other necessary contractual approvals required for the Issue. For furtherinformation, see the section “Government <strong>and</strong> Other Approvals” beginning on page 220 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.Authority for the Offer for SaleThe Offer for Sale h<strong>as</strong> been authorized <strong>as</strong> follows:(a) in respect <strong>of</strong> 1,285,101 Equity Shares included in the Offer for Sale, by NYLIM pursuant to a resolution <strong>of</strong> itsBoard <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> dated March 2, 2010;(b) in respect <strong>of</strong> 243,486 Equity Shares included in the Offer for Sale, by Commercial Automobiles pursuant to aresolution <strong>of</strong> its Board <strong>of</strong> <strong>Directors</strong> dated March 19, 2010.The Selling Shareholders confirm that the Equity Shares being <strong>of</strong>fered by them in the Offer for Sale have been heldfor a period <strong>of</strong> atle<strong>as</strong>t one year prior to the date <strong>of</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus with SEBI <strong>and</strong> are free <strong>and</strong> clear <strong>of</strong> anyliens <strong>and</strong> encumbrances.The Company <strong>and</strong> the Selling Shareholders have obtained an approval from the RBI dated June 8, 2010 in respect <strong>of</strong>the <strong>of</strong>fer in this Issue <strong>of</strong> the Equity Shares included in the Offer for Sale.Prohibition by SEBI, RBI or governmental authoritiesWe confirm that neither (i) the Company, the <strong>Promoters</strong>, members <strong>of</strong> the Promoter Group, <strong>Directors</strong>, GroupCompanies, persons in control <strong>of</strong> the Company, nor (ii) companies with which any <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Promoters</strong>, <strong>Directors</strong> orpersons in control <strong>of</strong> the Company are or were <strong>as</strong>sociated <strong>as</strong> a promoter, director or person in control, nor (iii) any <strong>of</strong>the Selling Shareholders are debarred or prohibited from accessing the capital markets under any order or directionp<strong>as</strong>sed by SEBI or any other authority.None <strong>of</strong> our <strong>Directors</strong> are <strong>as</strong>sociated with the securities market <strong>and</strong> there are no actions initiated by SEBI againstany Director.None <strong>of</strong> the Company, Group Companies, the <strong>Promoters</strong> or relatives <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Promoters</strong> (<strong>as</strong> per Companies Act,1956), or the Selling Shareholders have been declared <strong>as</strong> wilful defaulters by the RBI or any other governmentalauthority <strong>and</strong> there h<strong>as</strong> been no violation <strong>of</strong> any securities law committed by any <strong>of</strong> them in the p<strong>as</strong>t <strong>and</strong> no suchproceedings are pending against any <strong>of</strong> them except for violation by our Group Company, Kail<strong>as</strong>h Auto FinanceLimited, being the only company, <strong>of</strong> its obligations under the listing agreement, the Takeover Code <strong>and</strong> the SEBI(Prohibition <strong>of</strong> Insider Trading Regulations), 1992. For details refer to sections “Risk Factors” <strong>and</strong> “Outst<strong>and</strong>ingLitigation <strong>and</strong> Material Developments” beginning on pages XIII <strong>and</strong> 182 <strong>of</strong> this Prospectus.Eligibility for the IssueThe Company is eligible to make the Issue in terms <strong>of</strong> Regulation 26(1) <strong>of</strong> the ICDR Regulations, in accordancewith which the Company satisfies the following criteria:227


(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)it h<strong>as</strong> net tangible <strong>as</strong>sets <strong>of</strong> at le<strong>as</strong>t Rs. 30 million in each <strong>of</strong> the preceding three full years (<strong>of</strong> twelvemonths each), <strong>of</strong> which not more than 50% are held in monetary <strong>as</strong>sets;it h<strong>as</strong> a track record <strong>of</strong> distributable pr<strong>of</strong>its in terms <strong>of</strong> section 205 <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act, not countingextraordinary items, for at le<strong>as</strong>t three out <strong>of</strong> the immediately preceding five years;it h<strong>as</strong> a net worth <strong>of</strong> at le<strong>as</strong>t 10 million rupees in each <strong>of</strong> the preceding three full years (<strong>of</strong> twelve monthseach);the aggregate size <strong>of</strong> the Fresh Issue does not exceed five times the pre-Issue net worth <strong>of</strong> the Company,which is Rs. 711.71 million <strong>as</strong> per the audited balance sheet for FY 2010, <strong>as</strong> re<strong>stated</strong>;it h<strong>as</strong> changed its name only to delete the word “Private” from its name in the l<strong>as</strong>t one year, to be renamedCommercial Engineers & Body Builders Co. Limited.Further, in accordance with Regulation 26(4) <strong>of</strong> the ICDR Regulations, the Company shall ensure that the number <strong>of</strong>prospective Allotees to whom Equity Shares will be Allotted in the Issue shall not be less than 1,000, failing whichthe entire application monies will be refunded forthwith. In c<strong>as</strong>e <strong>of</strong> delay, if any, in refund, the Company shall payinterest on the application money at the rate <strong>of</strong> 15% per annum for the period <strong>of</strong> delay. In addition, in accordancewith Rule 19(2)(b) <strong>of</strong> the SCRR, a minimum <strong>of</strong> two million securities are being <strong>of</strong>fered to the public <strong>and</strong> the size <strong>of</strong>the Issue shall aggregate at le<strong>as</strong>t Rs.1,000 million <strong>and</strong> the Issue is made through the Book Building method with60% <strong>of</strong> the Net Issue size allocated to QIBs <strong>as</strong> specified by SEBI.Disclaimer Clause <strong>of</strong> SEBIAS REQUIRED, A COPY OF THIS DRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TOSEBI. IT IS TO BE DISTINCTLY UNDERSTOOD THAT SUBMISSION OF THE DRAFT RED HERRINGPROSPECTUS TO SEBI SHOULD NOT IN ANY WAY BE DEEMED OR CONSTRUED THAT THEDRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN CLEARED OR APPROVED BY SEBI. SEBI DOESNOT TAKE ANY RESPONSIBILITY EITHER FOR THE FINANCIAL SOUNDNESS OF ANY SCHEMEOR THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THE ISSUE IS PROPOSED TO BE MADE OR FOR THECORRECTNESS OF THE STATEMENTS MADE OR OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THE DRAFT REDHERRING PROSPECTUS. THE BOOK RUNNING LEAD MANAGERS, ICICI SECURITIES LIMITEDAND EDELWEISS CAPITAL LIMITED, HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THE DISCLOSURES MADE IN THEDRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS ARE GENERALLY ADEQUATE AND ARE IN CONFORMITYWITH THE SEBI (ISSUE OF CAPITAL AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2009IN FORCE FOR THE TIME BEING. THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO FACILITATE INVESTORS TOTAKE AN INFORMED DECISION FOR MAKING INVESTMENT IN THE PROPOSED ISSUE.IT SHOULD ALSO BE CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD THAT WHILE THE COMPANY AND EACHSELLING SHAREHOLDER (IN RESPECT OF STATEMENTS ABOUT OR IN RELATION TO IT) AREPRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORRECTNESS, ADEQUACY AND DISCLOSURE OF ALLRELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE DRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS, THE BOOK RUNNINGLEAD MANAGERS, ICICI SECURITIES LIMITED AND EDELWEISS CAPITAL LIMITED, AREEXPECTED TO EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE TO ENSURE THAT THE COMPANY AND (WHEREAPPLICABLE) THE SELLING SHAREHOLDERS DISCHARGE THEIR RESPONSIBILITYADEQUATELY IN THIS BEHALF AND TOWARDS THIS PURPOSE, THE BOOK RUNNING LEADMANAGERS, ICICI SECURITIES LIMITED AND EDELWEISS CAPITAL LIMITED, HAVEFURNISHED TO SEBI, A DUE DILIGENCE CERTIFICATE DATED MARCH 29, 2010 INACCORDANCE WITH THE SEBI (MERCHANT BANKERS) REGULATIONS, 1992 WHICH READS ASFOLLOWS:“WE HAVE EXAMINED VARIOUS DOCUMENTS INCLUDING THOSE RELATING TOLITIGATION LIKE COMMERCIAL DISPUTES, PATENT DISPUTES, DISPUTES WITHCOLLABORATORS, ETC. AND OTHER MATERIAL IN CONNECTION WITH THE FINALIZATIONOF THE DRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS PERTAINING TO THE SAID ISSUE;ON THE BASIS OF SUCH EXAMINATION AND THE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE COMPANY, ITSDIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS, THE SELLING SHAREHOLDERS, OTHER AGENCIES, ANDINDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THE STATEMENTS CONCERNING THE OBJECTS OF THE228


ISSUE, PRICE JUSTIFICATION AND THE CONTENTS OF THE DOCUMENTS AND OTHER PAPERSFURNISHED BY THE COMPANY, WE CONFIRM THAT:a) THE DRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS FILED WITH SEBI IS INCONFORMITY WITH THE DOCUMENTS, MATERIALS AND PAPERSRELEVANT TO THE ISSUE;b) ALL THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE ISSUE AS ALSO THEREGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, INSTRUCTIONS, ETC. FRAMED/ ISSUED BYSEBI, THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND ANY OTHER COMPETENTAUTHORITY IN THIS BEHALF HAVE BEEN DULY COMPLIED WITH;c) THE DISCLOSURES MADE IN THE DRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS ARETRUE, FAIR AND ADEQUATE TO ENABLE THE INVESTORS TO MAKE A WELLINFORMED DECISION AS TO THE INVESTMENT IN THE PROPOSED ISSUEAND SUCH DISCLOSURES ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA (ISSUE OF CAPITAL AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS)REGULATIONS, 2009 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS;WE CONFIRM THAT, BESIDES OURSELVES, ALL THE INTERMEDIARIES NAMED IN THEDRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS ARE REGISTERED WITH SEBI AND THAT TILL DATE SUCHREGISTRATION IS VALID;WE HAVE SATISFIED OURSELVES ABOUT THE CAPABILITY OF THE UNDERWRITERS TOFULFILL THEIR UNDERWRITING COMMITMENTS - NOTED FOR COMPLIANCEWE CERTIFY THAT WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE PROMOTERS HAS BEEN OBTAINEDFOR INCLUSION OF THEIR EQUITY SHARES AS PART OF PROMOTERS’ CONTRIBUTIONSUBJECT TO LOCK-IN AND THE EQUITY SHARES PROPOSED TO FORM PART OF PROMOTERS’CONTRIBUTION SUBJECT TO LOCK IN SHALL NOT BE DISPOSED / SOLD / TRANSFERRED BYTHE PROMOTER DURING THE PERIOD STARTING FROM THE DATE OF FILING THE DRAFTRED HERRING PROSPECTUS WITH SEBI TILL THE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LOCK-INPERIOD AS STATED IN THE DRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS.WE CERTIFY THAT REGULATION 33 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OFINDIA (ISSUE OF CAPITAL AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2009, WHICHRELATES TO SPECIFIED SECURITIES INELIGIBLE FOR COMPUTATION OF PROMOTERSCONTRIBUTION, HAS BEEN DULY COMPLIED WITH AND APPROPRIATE DISCLOSURES AS TOCOMPLIANCE WITH THE SAID REGULATION HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE DRAFT RED HERRINGPROSPECTUS - NOTED FOR COMPLIANCEWE UNDERTAKE THAT SUB-REGULATION (4) OF REGULATION 32 AND CLAUSE (C) AND (D)OF SUB REGULATION (2) OF REGULATION 8 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OFINDIA (ISSUE OF CAPITAL AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2009 SHALL BECOMPLIED WITH. WE CONFIRM THAT ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THATPROMOTER’S CONTRIBUTION SHALL BE RECEIVED AT LEAST ONE DAY BEFORE THEOPENING OF THE ISSUE. WE UNDERTAKE THAT AUDITORS’ CERTIFICATE TO THIS EFFECTSHALL BE DULY SUBMITTED TO SEBI. WE FURTHER CONFIRM THAT ARRANGEMENTS HAVEBEEN MADE TO ENSURE THAT PROMOTERS’ CONTRIBUTION SHALL BE KEPT IN AN ESCROWACCOUNT WITH A SCHEDULED COMMERCIAL BANK AND SHALL BE RELEASED TO THEISSUER ALONG WITH THE PROCEEDS OF THE PUBLIC ISSUE. – NOT APPLICABLEWE CERTIFY THAT THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPANY FOR WHICH THEFUNDS ARE BEING RAISED IN THE ISSUE FALL WITHIN THE ‘MAIN OBJECTS’ LISTED IN THEOBJECT CLAUSE OF THE MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION OR OTHER CHARTER OF THE229


COMPANY AND THAT THE ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT UNTIL NOW AREVALID IN TERMS OF THE OBJECT CLAUSE OF ITS MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION.WE CONFIRM THAT NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ENSURE THATTHE MONEYS RECEIVED PURSUANT TO THE ISSUE ARE KEPT IN A SEPARATE BANKACCOUNT AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF SUB-SECTION (3) OF SECTION 73 OF THE COMPANIESACT, 1956 AND THAT SUCH MONEYS SHALL BE RELEASED BY THE SAID BANK ONLY AFTERPERMISSION IS OBTAINED FROM ALL THE STOCK EXCHANGES MENTIONED IN THEPROSPECTUS. WE FURTHER CONFIRM THAT THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEENTHE BANKERS TO THE ISSUE AND THE COMPANY SPECIFICALLY CONTAINS THISCONDITION. – NOTED FOR COMPLIANCEWE CERTIFY THAT A DISCLOSURE HAS BEEN MADE IN THE RED HERRING PROSPECTUSTHAT THE INVESTORS SHALL BE GIVEN AN OPTION TO GET THE SHARES IN DEMAT ORPHYSICAL MODE. – NOT APPLICABLEWE CERTIFY THAT ALL THE APPLICABLE DISCLOSURES MANDATED IN THE SECURITIESAND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (ISSUE OF CAPITAL AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS)REGULATIONS, 2009 HAVE BEEN MADE IN ADDITION TO DISCLOSURES WHICH, IN OUR VIEW,ARE FAIR AND ADEQUATE TO ENABLE THE INVESTOR TO MAKE A WELL INFORMEDDECISION.WE CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING DISCLOSURES HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE DRAFTRED HERRING PROSPECTUS:(A)(B)AN UNDERTAKING FROM THE COMPANY THAT AT ANY GIVEN TIME, THERESHALL BE ONLY ONE DENOMINATION FOR THE EQUITY SHARES OF THECOMPANY; ANDAN UNDERTAKING FROM THE COMPANY THAT IT SHALL COMPLY WITH SUCHDISCLOSURE AND ACCOUNTING NORMS SPECIFIED BY SEBI FROM TIME TOTIME.WE UNDERTAKE TO COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS PERTAINING TOADVERTISEMENT IN TERMS OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (ISSUE OFCAPITAL AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2009 WHILE MAKING THE ISSUE.WE ENCLOSE A NOTE EXPLAINING HOW THE PROCESS OF DUE DILIGENCE HAS BEENEXERCISED BY US IN VIEW OF THE NATURE OF CURRENT BUSINESS BACKGROUND OF THECOMPANY, SITUATION AT WHICH THE PROPOSED BUSINESS STANDS, THE RISK FACTORS,PROMOTERS EXPERIENCE ,ETC.WE ENCLOSE A CHECKLIST CONFIRMING REGULATION-WISE COMPLIANCE WITH THEAPPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (ISSUE OFCAPITAL AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2009, CONTAINING DETAILSSUCH AS THE REGULATION NUMBER, ITS TEXT, THE STATUS OF COMPLIANCE, PAGENUMBER OF THE DRAFT RED HERRING PROSPECTUS WHERE THE REGULATION HAS BEENCOMPLIED WITH AND OUR COMMENTS, IF ANY.”THE FILING OF THE RED HERRING PROSPECTUS DOES NOT, HOWEVER, ABSOLVE THE COMPANY,OR WHERE RELEVANT WITH RESPECT TO THEIR EQUITY SHARES INCLUDED IN THE OFFER FORSALE, THE SELLING SHAREHOLDERS, FROM ANY LIABILITIES UNDER SECTION 63 OR SECTION 68OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 OR FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF OBTAINING SUCH STATUTORYAND OTHER CLEARANCES AS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED ISSUE.SEBI, FURTHER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE UP, AT ANY POINT OF TIME, WITH THE BOOKRUNNING LEAD MANAGERS ANY IRREGULARITIES OR LAPSES IN THIS RED HERRINGPROSPECTUS.230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!