12.07.2015 Views

Divergent Trajectories: Healthcare Insurance Reforms in East Asia ...

Divergent Trajectories: Healthcare Insurance Reforms in East Asia ...

Divergent Trajectories: Healthcare Insurance Reforms in East Asia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Illan Nam, Colgate University, Feb 2011Draft <strong>in</strong> progress, please do not quote or citefollow<strong>in</strong>g decade. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong> South Korea, while trade did not change mean<strong>in</strong>gfullybetween the two decades, averag<strong>in</strong>g around 66% of GDP <strong>in</strong> both decades, the level ofFDI/GDP <strong>in</strong>creased from below 2% <strong>in</strong> 1990 to around 12% by 2000, while portfolio<strong>in</strong>vestment rose more significantly from 1% <strong>in</strong> 1990 to 23%. In Chile, the level ofFDI/GDP <strong>in</strong>creased from 30% <strong>in</strong> 1990 to 61% <strong>in</strong> 2000 while portfolio <strong>in</strong>vestments rosefrom around 8% to 13%. 18LITERATURE REVIEWTo expla<strong>in</strong> the divergent outcomes of healthcare <strong>in</strong>surance reform <strong>in</strong> South Koreaand Chile, my argument emphasizes the degree of solidarity between the formal and<strong>in</strong>formal sectors as well as the different <strong>in</strong>centives that electoral competition <strong>in</strong> weakly<strong>in</strong>stitutionalized and regionalized party systems generated versus more robustly<strong>in</strong>stitutionalized and nationalized party systems. This argument builds upon and extendsseveral important schools of thought with<strong>in</strong> the welfare state literature. I briefly reviewthese major contributions, evaluat<strong>in</strong>g both their shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the puzzle Iexplore <strong>in</strong> this project as well as the ways <strong>in</strong> which they <strong>in</strong>formed my own argument.The globalization argumentOne of the most vigorous debates <strong>in</strong> the welfare state literature centers on thecapacity of governments to susta<strong>in</strong> welfare spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the face of <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>tegration<strong>in</strong> the markets for goods, capital, and services. The conventional wisdom aboutglobalization was that the competitive pressures brought about by <strong>in</strong>creased trade <strong>in</strong>goods and services and greater openness to capital flows would make it more difficult forstates to provide social welfare. Because these programs are f<strong>in</strong>anced by taxes on capital18 International F<strong>in</strong>ancial Statistics and Government F<strong>in</strong>ancial Statistics, various years (IMF)15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!