12.07.2015 Views

Divergent Trajectories: Healthcare Insurance Reforms in East Asia ...

Divergent Trajectories: Healthcare Insurance Reforms in East Asia ...

Divergent Trajectories: Healthcare Insurance Reforms in East Asia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Illan Nam, Colgate University, Feb 2011Draft <strong>in</strong> progress, please do not quote or citeSecond, the healthcare <strong>in</strong>surance <strong>in</strong>itiatives – as well as other welfare reformssuch as pensions and social assistance programs – were spearheaded by governments onboth sides of the partisan spectrum across the three countries and sometimes with<strong>in</strong>countries. In South Korea, the earlier <strong>in</strong>itiatives to expand coverage were undertaken bya right government (headed by the military regime’s candidate), while the 2001“Integration Reform” that established a s<strong>in</strong>gle-payer system was the legislativeachievement of a left-of-center government. In Thailand, the right-w<strong>in</strong>g Thaks<strong>in</strong>government was the key architect of the “30-baht card” scheme. F<strong>in</strong>ally, Chile’s AUGElegislation was proposed by the left-of-center Concertacion coalition. The lack of aconsistent relationship between partisanship and policy preferences casts doubt upon thepossibility that differences <strong>in</strong> ideological commitments accounted for the outcomes.More <strong>in</strong>trigu<strong>in</strong>gly, even <strong>in</strong> those cases where left parties were responsible for expansivepolicy <strong>in</strong>itiatives, such as the Integration Reform <strong>in</strong> South Korea and Plan AUGE <strong>in</strong>Chile, the ambitions of the reforms did not correspond to the strength and maturity ofparty organization and party system <strong>in</strong>stitutionalization. Party systems <strong>in</strong> South Koreaand Chile, for example, were characterized by significant disparities <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>stitutionalization. On one hand, the Chilean party system rank<strong>in</strong>g as one of the moststable <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America, 10 while on the other, South Korean parties have long beenidentified as short-lived vehicles of electoral ambitions for charismatic politicians thatwere not characterized by any mean<strong>in</strong>gful ideological dist<strong>in</strong>ctions. 11 Accord<strong>in</strong>gly,conventional wisdom would lead us to expect the Concertación to implement more10 See Arturo Valenzuela, Chile: Politics and Society, Scott Ma<strong>in</strong>war<strong>in</strong>g and Tim Scully, Build<strong>in</strong>gDemocratic Institutions: Party Systems <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America, Siavelis, Peter, The President and Congress <strong>in</strong>Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constra<strong>in</strong>ts to Democratic Consolidation11 Chung-In Moon and Jongryn Mo, Democratization and Globalization <strong>in</strong> Korea: Assessment andProspects (Seoul: Yonsei University Press 1999).12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!