12.07.2015 Views

Divergent Trajectories: Healthcare Insurance Reforms in East Asia ...

Divergent Trajectories: Healthcare Insurance Reforms in East Asia ...

Divergent Trajectories: Healthcare Insurance Reforms in East Asia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Illan Nam, Colgate University, Feb 2011Draft <strong>in</strong> progress, please do not quote or citeThe Chilean health system was a dual public/private system; those <strong>in</strong>dividualswho could afford private <strong>in</strong>surance or who worked for companies that purchased private<strong>in</strong>surance received healthcare at private cl<strong>in</strong>ics. The rest of the population was treated atfacilities <strong>in</strong> the public health sector, which generally was burdened by overcrowd<strong>in</strong>g,long wait<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es, and <strong>in</strong>ferior <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Although the question of dismantl<strong>in</strong>g thisparallel private-public system was never seriously enterta<strong>in</strong>ed, the health reformproposed <strong>in</strong> 2000 (“Plan AUGE”) forded mean<strong>in</strong>gful milestones towards connect<strong>in</strong>g thetwo systems by guarantee<strong>in</strong>g all Chileans timely treatment for 57 “priority diseases” atany facility, public or private. 7An important component of the reform called for apooled fund that would enhance the system’s f<strong>in</strong>ancial solidarity by redistribut<strong>in</strong>g moneyfrom the private to the public system, but the government ultimately abandoned thisproposal. Thus, while the more targeted component of the reform was implemented, theproposal to <strong>in</strong>crease f<strong>in</strong>ancial solidarity between the private and public systems was not.An exam<strong>in</strong>ation of these sets of reforms illustrates that the three cases varied <strong>in</strong>their efforts to achieve greater coverage and equity of benefits. If we map theseoutcomes onto a 2-dimensional graph, with the vertical axis represent<strong>in</strong>g solidarity andthe horizontal axis represent<strong>in</strong>g universality of coverage, we f<strong>in</strong>d that South Koreamoved from low coverage to high coverage and from low to high levels of risk-pool<strong>in</strong>g.Thailand, too, expanded coverage but fell short of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g higher-<strong>in</strong>come formalsector workers <strong>in</strong>to its 30-baht card program. F<strong>in</strong>ally, Chile’s AUGE program achievedgreater access for lower-<strong>in</strong>come workers although its healthcare program alreadydelivered, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple at least, universal coverage. Risk-pool<strong>in</strong>g, on the other hand,7 The list of “priority diseases” was set to be <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>crementally over time.10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!