12.07.2015 Views

Software and IT Services in the European Union ... - ITOnews.eu

Software and IT Services in the European Union ... - ITOnews.eu

Software and IT Services in the European Union ... - ITOnews.eu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>’s Programme for Ukra<strong>in</strong>eSupport to <strong>the</strong> Development of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Capacity ofUkra<strong>in</strong>ian SMEs – International DimensionEuropeAid/124928/C/SER/UA<strong>Software</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>Market SurveyThe project is fundedby<strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>The project is implemented bya WYG International led consortium


2SOFTWARE AND <strong>IT</strong> SERVICESIN THE EUROPEAN UNIONMARKET SURVEYCompiled <strong>and</strong> prepared by: Elzbieta LENKIEWICZThe contents of this publication are <strong>the</strong> sole responsibility of WYG International <strong>and</strong> can<strong>in</strong> no way be taken to reflect <strong>the</strong> views of <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>.


TABLE OF CONTENTS1 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................................................41 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................52 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................83 SOFTWARE AND <strong>IT</strong> SERVICES CHARACTERISTICS......................................................................104 DEMAND FOR SOFTWARE AND <strong>IT</strong> SERVICES IN THE EU .............................................................165 SUPPLY OF SOFTWARE AND <strong>IT</strong> SERVICES IN THE EU .................................................................226 THE OFFSHORE/NEARSHORE OUTSOURCING MARKET IN THE EU............................................237 OUTSOURCING LOCATIONS FOR SOFTWARE AND <strong>IT</strong> SERVICES ...............................................318 DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS..............................................................................................................389 PRICES..............................................................................................................................................4210 CONCLUSIONS ON THE EU MARKET OPPORTUN<strong>IT</strong>IES FOR UKRAINIAN SME .........................44ANNEX I USEFUL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON THE EU MARKET FOR <strong>IT</strong> SOFTWARE ANDSERVICES ............................................................................................................................................48ANNEX II A.T.KEARNEY GLOBAL SERVICES LOCATION INDEX METRIX.......................................50ANNEX III EVALUATION OF <strong>IT</strong> OUTSOURCING POTENTIAL OF UKRAINE .....................................51ANNEX IV REFERENCES....................................................................................................................533


41 List of AbbreviationsAM Application ManagementBI Bus<strong>in</strong>ess IntelligenceBPO Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Process Outsourc<strong>in</strong>gBPM Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Performance ManagementCBICentre for Promotion of Imports from Develop<strong>in</strong>g CountriesCRMCustomer Relationship ManagementDC Develop<strong>in</strong>g CountryECODE <strong>European</strong> Center for Offshore DevelopmentE<strong>IT</strong>O <strong>European</strong> Information Technology ObservatoryERP Enterprise Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>gEU <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong>Euro<strong>IT</strong>X<strong>European</strong> Information Technology Exchange – offshoreoutsourc<strong>in</strong>g adviserICTInformation <strong>and</strong> Communications TechnologyIPPIntellectual Property ProtectionISInformation System<strong>IT</strong> Information Technology<strong>IT</strong>O <strong>IT</strong> Outsourc<strong>in</strong>gNDOS Network <strong>and</strong> Desktop Outsourc<strong>in</strong>gSaaS <strong>Software</strong> as a ServiceSAP Systems, Applications <strong>and</strong> Products <strong>in</strong> Data Process<strong>in</strong>gSCM Supply Cha<strong>in</strong> ManagementSME Small <strong>and</strong> Medium EnterpriseSOA <strong>Services</strong> Oriented ArchitectureUASWD Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian Association of <strong>Software</strong> DevelopersUNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade <strong>and</strong> Development4


51 Executive SummaryIntroductionThis survey has been prepared accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> project Terms of Reference (page20, section 4.2.1, activity No 7). which state that: “The Consultant shall conductmarket research <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> appropriate EU countries for <strong>the</strong> identification of niches to beoccupied by Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian SME”. The tender for <strong>the</strong> project <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Inception Report,presented to <strong>the</strong> Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee on 11 December 2007 <strong>and</strong> 18 January 2008,outl<strong>in</strong>ed our concept of <strong>the</strong> market survey for <strong>the</strong> three sectors selected for <strong>the</strong>project support: <strong>IT</strong> services, woodwork<strong>in</strong>g & furniture, mach<strong>in</strong>ery & equipment.The purpose of this survey is to assist <strong>the</strong> small <strong>and</strong> medium-sized exporters ofsoftware (related) services <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> enter<strong>in</strong>g orstreng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g a position <strong>in</strong> EU markets, through:• provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on developments of <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU,• identify<strong>in</strong>g market opportunities <strong>and</strong> potential competitors,• <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g strategies to enter <strong>the</strong> market <strong>and</strong> develop commercial l<strong>in</strong>ks with <strong>the</strong>EU partners.This document is a reference tool. The Centre for Promotion of Imports fromdevelop<strong>in</strong>g countries (CBI) has been <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>formation for this survey.The Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian <strong>IT</strong> companies will need to do <strong>the</strong>ir own <strong>in</strong>-depth research to determ<strong>in</strong>eif <strong>the</strong> EU is <strong>the</strong> suitable market <strong>and</strong> which country or countries are <strong>the</strong> mostpromis<strong>in</strong>g. Useful sources of <strong>in</strong>formation for an <strong>in</strong>-depth study are provided <strong>in</strong> AnnexI to this survey.<strong>Services</strong> coveredThe def<strong>in</strong>ition for software, <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>and</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g that is used <strong>in</strong> this survey is<strong>the</strong> one used by <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Information Technology Observatory (E<strong>IT</strong>O). <strong>Software</strong>products consist of system software <strong>and</strong> application software. <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>in</strong>cludeprofessional <strong>and</strong> support services.The software, <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>and</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g market is a good opportunityfor <strong>IT</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian companies if <strong>the</strong>y wish to participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong>services market. This participation is also advantageous for <strong>the</strong> EU companies. Theycan fulfill <strong>the</strong>ir cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g desire to improve quality <strong>and</strong> reduce costs by profit<strong>in</strong>g from<strong>the</strong> lower costs <strong>and</strong> high-quality skills <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. At <strong>the</strong> moment <strong>the</strong> most promis<strong>in</strong>gsegment for Ukra<strong>in</strong>e is offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>refore it is a major part of thissurvey.Dem<strong>and</strong> for software productsThe total market for software products <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU amounted to €76 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006,<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g 12.9% compared to 2004. The market was expected to realise a solidgrowth of ano<strong>the</strong>r 6.6% <strong>in</strong> 2007. The market consists of system software (€40.5billion <strong>in</strong> 2006) <strong>and</strong> application software (€35.1 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006). Germany was <strong>the</strong>largest market for software products <strong>in</strong> 2005. It was followed by <strong>the</strong> UK, France, <strong>the</strong>Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s, Italy, Sweden, Spa<strong>in</strong>, Belgium <strong>and</strong> Denmark.Dem<strong>and</strong> for <strong>IT</strong> services5


6The total market for <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU was valued at €140 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006, agrowth of 11% compared to 2004. Growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services is anticipated to reachalmost €156 billion (plus 11%) <strong>in</strong> 2008. The UK was <strong>the</strong> largest market for <strong>IT</strong> services<strong>in</strong> 2005. It was followed by Germany, France, Italy, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s, Spa<strong>in</strong>, Sweden,Belgium <strong>and</strong> Denmark.SupplyA consolidation can be seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> market for software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> servicessupply. Open source software is ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> importance. Several governments havepromoted <strong>the</strong> use of open source software. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, near- <strong>and</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g isga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> importance.The EU offshore / nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g marketGrowth of <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g on offshor<strong>in</strong>g is expected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next few years.Op<strong>in</strong>ions on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity of this growth differ. One source expects a 50% year-onyearrise <strong>in</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2007-2008. Ano<strong>the</strong>r source forecasts that <strong>European</strong>spend<strong>in</strong>g will achieve an average growth of 6% over 5 years <strong>and</strong> <strong>European</strong>companies will spend a total of €146 billion <strong>in</strong> 2011. <strong>IT</strong> jobs will move offshore mostrapidly from <strong>the</strong> UK with cont<strong>in</strong>ental countries match<strong>in</strong>g that trend at a lower level ofimpact. Up until now it is ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> larger companies that have started to offshore<strong>and</strong> nearshore <strong>the</strong>ir software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services. Although still develop<strong>in</strong>g slowly, <strong>the</strong>reis a trend <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>European</strong> countries (such as Sweden, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s,Denmark <strong>and</strong> Germany) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK towards a greater <strong>in</strong>volvement of SMEs <strong>in</strong>outsourc<strong>in</strong>g software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services. Offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong>services will be <strong>the</strong> next step for <strong>the</strong>se SMEs. In o<strong>the</strong>r countries such as BelgiumFrance, Spa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Italy, SMEs are not ready for offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g yet.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to experts, <strong>the</strong> SMEs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se countries are only just discover<strong>in</strong>g onshoreoutsourc<strong>in</strong>g.Driv<strong>in</strong>g factors for offshor<strong>in</strong>g are still cost cutt<strong>in</strong>g, access to skilled labour <strong>and</strong>improv<strong>in</strong>g quality. The ma<strong>in</strong> barriers are cultural <strong>and</strong> language differences <strong>and</strong> a lackof trust.The best potential for offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g lies <strong>in</strong> software applications <strong>and</strong>software systems. For professional <strong>IT</strong> services, <strong>the</strong> best chances for offshor<strong>in</strong>g /nearshor<strong>in</strong>g lie <strong>in</strong> implementation <strong>and</strong> operations management services. Supportservices have <strong>the</strong> lowest chance <strong>in</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g.Offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g trendsOffshore / nearshore software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services outsourc<strong>in</strong>g is now accepted as anormal bus<strong>in</strong>ess practice.• Nearshor<strong>in</strong>g is one of <strong>the</strong> most important trends <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU, due to cultural <strong>and</strong>geographical advantages <strong>and</strong> a greater sense of control for EU companies.• Security <strong>and</strong> Intellectual Property Protection are becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important.• Multi-sourc<strong>in</strong>g will emerge. It is characterised by mak<strong>in</strong>g use of several suppliers<strong>and</strong> supply markets to spread risks.• Growth, efficiency <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> availability of a skilled labour force will become moreimportant next to cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs.• A significant <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> project management offices is expected because ofmulti-vendor, multi-model <strong>and</strong> multi-country contract<strong>in</strong>g that is com<strong>in</strong>g up.• India will streng<strong>the</strong>n its position by offer<strong>in</strong>g more extensive choices.• Many mergers <strong>and</strong> acquisitions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services market.6


7• Integrated <strong>IT</strong>O <strong>and</strong> BPO deals will have mixed success.• Ma<strong>in</strong>ly large companies will offshore <strong>and</strong> nearshore <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU.Offshore / nearshore locationsIndia rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> best offshore location by a wide marg<strong>in</strong>, although wage <strong>in</strong>flation<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> emergence of lower-cost countries decreased its overall lead. However,more <strong>and</strong> more <strong>European</strong> countries look to nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations for offshor<strong>in</strong>gtasks. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to some experts, <strong>the</strong>re is a threat of <strong>the</strong> labour pool runn<strong>in</strong>g dry <strong>in</strong>some develop<strong>in</strong>g countries (e.g. India). It may create market opportunities forUkra<strong>in</strong>e which is an emerg<strong>in</strong>g outsourc<strong>in</strong>g location.Distribution channelsIn practice, <strong>the</strong>re are three most common sales channels for service providers fromnon-EU countries:1 st option - establish<strong>in</strong>g a sales office <strong>in</strong> an EU member country could be a verygood option to battle <strong>the</strong> lack of trust <strong>and</strong> credibility among EU companies.2 nd option - work<strong>in</strong>g with an <strong>in</strong>termediary (broker/consultant). An example of a brokeris <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Information Technology eXchange. It focuses on suppliers fromdevelop<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>and</strong> buyers from Europe.3 rd option - build<strong>in</strong>g a partnership with an EU company (e.g. a jo<strong>in</strong>t-venture).Price developmentsAs <strong>the</strong> shortage <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong> professionals <strong>in</strong> EU countries <strong>in</strong>creases, prices for software <strong>and</strong><strong>IT</strong> services will also <strong>in</strong>crease. However, <strong>the</strong>re is also price pressure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> offshore /nearshore market. The price pressure seems to be particularly strong for <strong>IT</strong> serviceswith low requirements for skills <strong>and</strong> experience. Wages for <strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g serviceproviders <strong>in</strong> key offshore markets, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g India, Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong>, are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gby an average 8 to 11% per year, accord<strong>in</strong>g to f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> 2006 by <strong>the</strong> EverestResearch Institute – an outsourc<strong>in</strong>g research <strong>in</strong>stitution. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to CBI experts,<strong>the</strong> EU market will tolerate a small price <strong>in</strong>crease as price is no longer <strong>the</strong> only focalpo<strong>in</strong>t for EU companies that want to offshore / nearshore <strong>the</strong>ir software or <strong>IT</strong>services. The emphasis is also on quality <strong>and</strong> security of <strong>the</strong> projects.7


82 IntroductionObjectiveThe purpose of this survey is to assist <strong>the</strong> small <strong>and</strong> medium-sized exporters of software(related) services <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> enter<strong>in</strong>g or streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g a position<strong>in</strong> EU markets by:• provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on developments of <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU,• identify<strong>in</strong>g market opportunities,• <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g strategies to enter <strong>the</strong> market <strong>and</strong> develop commercial l<strong>in</strong>ks with <strong>the</strong> EU partners,• specify<strong>in</strong>g useful sources of <strong>in</strong>formation for an <strong>in</strong>-depth study which can be undertaken byan <strong>in</strong>dividual company.This document is a reference tool. It has been prepared based on <strong>the</strong> market analysis available<strong>in</strong> Internet. The CBI Market Information Database has been <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>formation for<strong>the</strong> EU market survey 1 . The Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian service provider will need to do his own <strong>in</strong>-depthresearch to determ<strong>in</strong>e if <strong>the</strong> EU is <strong>the</strong> suitable market <strong>and</strong> which country or countries are <strong>the</strong>most promis<strong>in</strong>g. It should be noted that although <strong>the</strong>re are many similarities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU countries,each country must be treated differently. Useful sources of <strong>in</strong>formation for an <strong>in</strong>-depth study areprovided <strong>in</strong> Annex I.<strong>Services</strong> coveredAs a result of a decreas<strong>in</strong>g workforce <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong>-services sector <strong>in</strong> most EUcountries <strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g need for skilled but competitively priced labour, companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>EU have to start look<strong>in</strong>g for o<strong>the</strong>r solutions for <strong>the</strong>ir software development <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong>-services.Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g are solutions that can <strong>the</strong>n be used.This market survey profiles <strong>the</strong> market for software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU. The emphasis ofthis survey lies on <strong>the</strong> potential for offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se services to Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, as it isconsidered as <strong>the</strong> best opportunity for Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian SMEs that offer software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services.This market survey discusses <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g service groups, as <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g forexporters:• <strong>Software</strong> applications,• System software,• Professional <strong>IT</strong> services,• Support <strong>IT</strong> services.ICT sector <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e1 The Centre for <strong>the</strong> Promotion of Imports from develop<strong>in</strong>g countries (CBI) is an Agency of <strong>the</strong>M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs <strong>and</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> development cooperation effort of The Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s. Itsmission is to contribute to <strong>the</strong> economic development of develop<strong>in</strong>g countries by streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>competitiveness of companies from those countries on <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> (EU & EFTA) markets. Ukra<strong>in</strong>eis <strong>in</strong>cluded on <strong>the</strong> OECD list of develop<strong>in</strong>g countries.8


9For <strong>IT</strong> companies from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services marketprovides a good opportunity for growth. These companies can offer <strong>the</strong> competitively pricedlabour <strong>and</strong> at <strong>the</strong> same time Ukra<strong>in</strong>e has a high number of technically tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> skilled people:<strong>the</strong> sector employs 25,000-30,000 certified programmers <strong>and</strong> many more specialists of differentbackgrounds <strong>and</strong> qualifications beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g from students that work on a part-time basis up torocket scientists <strong>and</strong> aviation eng<strong>in</strong>eers that assist <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g customized programmes forcomplicated technological processes. Ukra<strong>in</strong>e has ca 30,000 <strong>IT</strong> graduates arriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>workforce each year.Ukra<strong>in</strong>e has emerged as a low cost site for high quality software development <strong>and</strong> it isconsidered as an one of <strong>the</strong> most attractive outsourc<strong>in</strong>g dest<strong>in</strong>ation for software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services<strong>in</strong> Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe. If several years ago <strong>the</strong> producers worked mostly alone or <strong>in</strong>small quasi underground groups on outsourced projects ordered from abroad, now <strong>the</strong>re is agrow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest among Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian computer companies to organize software production centresthat could participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational software development projects. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>,established computer development companies started creat<strong>in</strong>g consortia <strong>and</strong> professionalassociations to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong>ir market competitiveness <strong>and</strong> visibility.Key figures on <strong>the</strong> sectorThere is a lack of reliable statistical <strong>in</strong>dicators on <strong>the</strong> sector development <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. Accord<strong>in</strong>gto estimates:• <strong>the</strong> share of <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> GDP is approx. 3%;• <strong>the</strong> computer software development accounts for 10-30 percent of <strong>IT</strong> market revenues;• <strong>the</strong> software development for exports (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g outsourc<strong>in</strong>g) is approx 30-40% of totalsoftware development <strong>and</strong> it grows better than sales <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> domestic market: almost 50% ayear dur<strong>in</strong>g last three years 2 ;• <strong>the</strong> nearshore/offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g market <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e reached $246 million <strong>in</strong> 2006 3 ;however it should be underl<strong>in</strong>ed that approx 90% of <strong>the</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g is done on <strong>the</strong> “blackmarket” 4• average annual export sales for forty lead<strong>in</strong>g software development firms vary from $315,000 to $ 6 million per company;• <strong>the</strong>re are some 1,300 officially registered companies deliver<strong>in</strong>g software-related products<strong>and</strong> services, <strong>in</strong> this approx 300 companies specialize <strong>in</strong> nearshore / offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment projects; company staff varies from 10 to 380 employees;• approx 14,000 <strong>IT</strong> specialists are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g services;• <strong>IT</strong> professionals’ rates per year range between $ 25,920 <strong>and</strong> $ 49,600 (this <strong>in</strong>cludes salary,taxes, office facilities etc.) 5 ;• most of <strong>the</strong> exported software is developed <strong>and</strong> customized based on customer orders;• export is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by legacy systems, solutions for corporate account<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g,bill<strong>in</strong>g systems, embedded solutions, web applications <strong>and</strong> computer games; f<strong>in</strong>ishedsolutions account for 20-30% of exported products.2 Estimates by The Association of <strong>Software</strong> Developers “<strong>IT</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e”3 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to goal<strong>eu</strong>rope.com, a lead<strong>in</strong>g expert on Russian & Eastern <strong>European</strong> software development.4 In 2000 <strong>the</strong> government officially registered 3.1 million USD of <strong>the</strong> offshore software development <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, while<strong>the</strong> real value was estimated at 32 million USD - accord<strong>in</strong>g to data given by <strong>the</strong> UASWD <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> White Paper onOffshore Development <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e produced by <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> Committee of <strong>the</strong> American Chamber of Commerce <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e.5 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to “Central & Eastern Europe <strong>IT</strong> Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Review ‘2007” by Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian HI-TECH Initiative9


10The <strong>IT</strong> sector <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e benefits from geographical proximity to <strong>the</strong> EU market <strong>and</strong> positivechanges <strong>in</strong> social <strong>and</strong> economic life <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country which boost<strong>in</strong>g partnership between EU <strong>and</strong>Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian companies. Frequent changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> government do not affect <strong>the</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>gbus<strong>in</strong>esses, however its policies such as <strong>in</strong>crease of education budget to 6.5% of GDP play apositive role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> long-term prospects of <strong>the</strong> software development <strong>in</strong>dustry. A lack of <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>tegration with <strong>the</strong> EU keeps <strong>the</strong> prices <strong>in</strong> check <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> professionals from leav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> country.Both new <strong>and</strong> old EU member states qualified <strong>IT</strong> resources <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. In particular UK <strong>and</strong>Germany recognize <strong>the</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g opportunity <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to estimations Germancustomers employ 6% of all offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g resources <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e.3 <strong>Software</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>Services</strong> CharacteristicsDef<strong>in</strong>itions software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> servicesIn this survey, <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions for software products <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services from <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong>Information Technology Observatory (E<strong>IT</strong>O) are used. This is a well-reputed source <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>dustry that has very detailed <strong>and</strong> up to date <strong>in</strong>formation available. Table 2.1 presents <strong>the</strong>different product groups with<strong>in</strong> software products <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services.Table 3.1 Product group def<strong>in</strong>ition software products <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services<strong>Software</strong> products • System software; system <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>and</strong> applicationtools• Application software<strong>IT</strong> services• Professional services• Support servicesSource: E<strong>IT</strong>O, modified by Facts Figures Future (2007)<strong>Software</strong> productsAccord<strong>in</strong>g to E<strong>IT</strong>O, software products are ‘commercially available packaged programmes forsale or lease from systems services <strong>and</strong> Independent <strong>Software</strong> Vendors (ISVs)’. Value <strong>in</strong>cludes<strong>the</strong> packaged software fees plus related non-consult<strong>in</strong>g revenue, such as fees for ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<strong>and</strong>/or support. It <strong>in</strong>cludes licence fees for software ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, services, <strong>and</strong>/or support.O<strong>the</strong>r forms of software support would be counted with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> support services category.<strong>Software</strong> products can be categorised <strong>in</strong>to two segments:• System software,• Application software.System softwareIt <strong>in</strong>cludes system <strong>in</strong>frastructure software <strong>and</strong> application tools:• System <strong>in</strong>frastructure software <strong>in</strong>cludes system management software, networkmanagement, security software, storage software, server ware, network<strong>in</strong>g software, <strong>and</strong>system-level software.• Application tools <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> data management software, application design <strong>and</strong>construction tools, application lifecycle management, application deployment platforms,middleware, o<strong>the</strong>r development tools <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation access <strong>and</strong> delivery tools. Examples<strong>in</strong>clude database eng<strong>in</strong>es, 4GL(fourth generation programm<strong>in</strong>g language. Class of computer10


11languages closest to human languages), AMD (Analysis, Modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Design) <strong>and</strong>3GL(third generation programm<strong>in</strong>g language e.g. C, C++, <strong>and</strong> Java).Application softwareIt <strong>in</strong>cludes consumer, commercial, <strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>and</strong> technical programmes <strong>and</strong> code sets designedto automate specific bus<strong>in</strong>ess processes <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dustry or bus<strong>in</strong>ess function. Applicationsoftware <strong>in</strong>creases productivity <strong>and</strong> supports enterta<strong>in</strong>ment, education <strong>and</strong> data process<strong>in</strong>g. Thepackaged application market consists of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g sub segments:• Consumer applications (also known as consumer off <strong>the</strong> shelf software),• Content applications (e.g. content management systems),• Collaborative applications (e.g. groupware or messag<strong>in</strong>g software)• Enterprise applications. This is application software that performs bus<strong>in</strong>ess functions such asaccount<strong>in</strong>g, production schedul<strong>in</strong>g, customer <strong>in</strong>formation management, bank accountma<strong>in</strong>tenance. The segment consists of back-office, eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> CRM (CustomerRelationship Management) applications.<strong>IT</strong> servicesAs mentioned <strong>in</strong> table 2.1, <strong>IT</strong> services can be divided <strong>in</strong>to two product groups:• Professional services,• Support services.Process<strong>in</strong>g services were removed from <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>IT</strong> services as <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glyprovided by bus<strong>in</strong>ess services players as part of <strong>the</strong>ir Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Process Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g (BPO)activities.Professional servicesThese services consist of:• Consult<strong>in</strong>g,• Implementation,• Operations management.Consult<strong>in</strong>gThis product group consists of a wide variety of <strong>IT</strong>-related plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> design activities thatassist clients <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>IT</strong>-related decisions on bus<strong>in</strong>ess direction or <strong>in</strong>formation technology.With<strong>in</strong> consult<strong>in</strong>g, two k<strong>in</strong>ds can be def<strong>in</strong>ed, namely <strong>IT</strong> related bus<strong>in</strong>ess consult<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong>consult<strong>in</strong>g.<strong>IT</strong> related bus<strong>in</strong>ess consult<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cludes:• Corporate strategy assistance.• Process improvement.• Capacity plann<strong>in</strong>g.• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess process re-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. This is consult<strong>in</strong>g aimed at improvements by means ofelevat<strong>in</strong>g efficiency <strong>and</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> processes that exist with<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> acrossorganisations. <strong>IT</strong> plays a role as enabler of new organisational forms, <strong>and</strong> patterns ofcollaboration with<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> between organisations.• Change management services for bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Provid<strong>in</strong>g organisations with a discipl<strong>in</strong>edprocess that can <strong>in</strong>troduce required changes <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment with m<strong>in</strong>imaldisruption to ongo<strong>in</strong>g operations.Excluded are consult<strong>in</strong>g services <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g tax, audits, benefits, f<strong>in</strong>ancial, <strong>and</strong>/or eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>gissues.11


12<strong>IT</strong> consult<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cludes:• Information systems strategy assistance.• Information system <strong>and</strong> network plann<strong>in</strong>g.• Architectural <strong>and</strong> supplier assessments.• Product consult<strong>in</strong>g.• Technical designs for <strong>in</strong>formation technology.• Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance plann<strong>in</strong>g.ImplementationImplementation comprises all activities directly <strong>in</strong>volved with <strong>the</strong> creation of technical <strong>and</strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>IT</strong> solutions. It <strong>in</strong>cludes:• Procur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology.• Configur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology.• Install<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology.• Develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology.• Mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology.• Test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology.• Manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technology.Implementation services also consist of all activities <strong>in</strong>volved with custom applicationdevelopment <strong>and</strong> work performed on packaged applications. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> education is also<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this segment. It comprises activities required for <strong>the</strong> transmission of new behaviours,skills or actions that can be used to start perform<strong>in</strong>g job-specific tasks or improve performance <strong>in</strong><strong>IT</strong>-related functions.Operations managementThis <strong>in</strong>volves tak<strong>in</strong>g responsibility for manag<strong>in</strong>g components of a client’s <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure.Specific activities <strong>in</strong>clude:• Help-desk services.• Asset management services.• Systems management.• Network management.• <strong>Software</strong> update management.• Facilities management.• Back-up <strong>and</strong> archiv<strong>in</strong>g.• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess recovery services.Support servicesThese services <strong>in</strong>clude all activities <strong>in</strong>volved with ensur<strong>in</strong>g that hardware, software <strong>and</strong>network<strong>in</strong>g products are perform<strong>in</strong>g properly as a service to clients. Activities <strong>in</strong>clude allma<strong>in</strong>tenance contracts for hardware, software <strong>and</strong> network<strong>in</strong>g products, as well as services,such as telephone support to resolve problems for clients <strong>and</strong> help with workarounds. <strong>Services</strong><strong>in</strong> this category appear as bundled packages of o<strong>the</strong>r services or st<strong>and</strong>-alone.Def<strong>in</strong>itions of outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, onshor<strong>in</strong>g, offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>gCompanies <strong>in</strong> advanced, ‘high-cost’ economies are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly look<strong>in</strong>g to contract out software<strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services work to companies <strong>in</strong> ‘low-cost’ nations or regions that can offer a skilledworkforce <strong>and</strong> high quality solutions.12


13The contract<strong>in</strong>g out of parts of a bus<strong>in</strong>ess is called outsourc<strong>in</strong>g. This is by far <strong>the</strong> most promis<strong>in</strong>gICT segment for companies <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, <strong>in</strong> this from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. There are differenttypes of outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, namely:• Onshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g• Nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g• Offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gFigure 3.1 Onshore, nearshore <strong>and</strong> offshore market characteristicsSource: neo<strong>IT</strong> (2005)Onshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gIt is <strong>the</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g of a certa<strong>in</strong> part of a bus<strong>in</strong>ess process with<strong>in</strong> your own country.Nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gIt is def<strong>in</strong>ed as outsourc<strong>in</strong>g parts of a bus<strong>in</strong>ess to a neighbour<strong>in</strong>g country or a country that is lessthan 3 hours by plane away from <strong>the</strong> country of orig<strong>in</strong>. Nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations for companies <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> EU are: Eastern Europe (<strong>in</strong> this Ukra<strong>in</strong>e), <strong>the</strong> Baltic states <strong>and</strong> North African countries suchas Morocco <strong>and</strong> Tunisia.Offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gSyntect Informatique – a French research agency specialis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ICT sector- def<strong>in</strong>es offshoreoutsourc<strong>in</strong>g as outsourc<strong>in</strong>g parts of a bus<strong>in</strong>ess overseas (from <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of view). Thismeans outsourc<strong>in</strong>g to countries outside Europe <strong>and</strong> more than 3 hours away by plane from <strong>the</strong>country that is outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess. The most important offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gdest<strong>in</strong>ation for <strong>the</strong> EU companies is India.13


14<strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g is usually chosen by bus<strong>in</strong>esses as a way of concentrat<strong>in</strong>g upon core bus<strong>in</strong>esscompetences, <strong>and</strong> transferr<strong>in</strong>g control of some or all of <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> functions <strong>and</strong> services toprofessional providers that possess <strong>the</strong> required expertise <strong>and</strong> resources. <strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g is avery complex set of relationships, much more sophisticated than outsorc<strong>in</strong>g of o<strong>the</strong>r bus<strong>in</strong>essfunctions such as manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, market<strong>in</strong>g etc. Nearshore/offshore <strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g is a lot morechalleng<strong>in</strong>g for bus<strong>in</strong>ess when compare to domestic <strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> many respects.Companies are embrac<strong>in</strong>g nearshore/offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir competitivelevels. The major reasons <strong>and</strong> value proportions for companies outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir projects abroadare simple: cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs, better product quality, faster delivery times, access to scarce skills <strong>and</strong>improved efficiency. Although <strong>the</strong>re has been some “backlash” <strong>and</strong> return of provision ofnearshore/offshore locations, many companies are still consider<strong>in</strong>g outsourc<strong>in</strong>g possibilities asmanagers <strong>and</strong> executives beg<strong>in</strong> to realise <strong>the</strong> numerous advantages of this approach <strong>in</strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess performance. Apart from <strong>the</strong> above mentioned <strong>in</strong>ternal objectives that companiespursue <strong>in</strong> today’s bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment, <strong>the</strong>re are external forces that assist firms <strong>in</strong> decid<strong>in</strong>g tooutsource. The most notable external sourc<strong>in</strong>g drivers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global economy are globalization,deregulation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> Internet 6 .<strong>Software</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services outsourc<strong>in</strong>gIn this survey we ma<strong>in</strong>ly focus on <strong>the</strong> possibilities for nearshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>the</strong>se are<strong>the</strong> areas that offer <strong>the</strong> best opportunities for Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian companies.<strong>IT</strong> services offshore/nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gThe core <strong>in</strong>terest consists of custom development solutions, web application development,system <strong>in</strong>tegration, database management <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> consultancy services (re-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g,localisation, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, test<strong>in</strong>g, cod<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>IT</strong> security services, web enablement, migration).Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g services that are <strong>IT</strong> driven or require <strong>the</strong> help of <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>and</strong> resources arecalled bus<strong>in</strong>ess process outsourc<strong>in</strong>g (BPO). A few examples of BPO are medical (legal)transcription, onl<strong>in</strong>e education, onl<strong>in</strong>e tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, data process<strong>in</strong>g (data entry), data digitisation <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> call centres. It is important to underst<strong>and</strong> that <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>and</strong> BPO have overlapp<strong>in</strong>g areas.Some examples are data centres, network management, desktop PC management, helpdesksupport, <strong>IT</strong> facility management, imag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g.In general, <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g activities can be considered as <strong>IT</strong>-activities with a high potential foroffshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g:• Activities with a high degree of commoditisation.• Activities with a low degree of customer <strong>in</strong>timacy.<strong>Software</strong> development offshore/nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gOnly very few firms <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries 7 , <strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, are able to build <strong>and</strong> marketapplication software <strong>the</strong>mselves. Success <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir domestic market is essential <strong>and</strong> without anylocal market for packaged software it is almost impossible to f<strong>in</strong>ance export market<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Software</strong>development, large programm<strong>in</strong>g projects <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance are activities with a high6 Busher, J. (2002) What is your Sourc<strong>in</strong>g Strategy?, The Outsorc<strong>in</strong>g Project, Vol. 1,, March 11.7 When referr<strong>in</strong>g to develop<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong> this market surveys, reference is made to <strong>the</strong> group of countries on thisOECD DAC list of January 2006. Ukra<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>in</strong>cluded to this group.14


15(offshore/nearshore) outsourc<strong>in</strong>g potential. To be more specific, <strong>the</strong> actual development ofsoftware could be outsourced more easily than design, specification, <strong>and</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g.Figure 2.2 shows this <strong>in</strong> a simplified manner.Figure 3.2 <strong>Software</strong> development processOnshoreOnshoreApply<strong>in</strong>gDesignSpecificationsReceiv<strong>in</strong>gTest<strong>in</strong>gIf errorsReceivespecificationsConstructCod<strong>in</strong>gSource: Hee, van (2004)Statistical product classificationMeasur<strong>in</strong>g trade <strong>in</strong> software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services for bus<strong>in</strong>ess purposes is very complicated, due tolimitations <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions <strong>and</strong> challenges <strong>in</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> data. There are no well-def<strong>in</strong>edclassifications <strong>in</strong> 6 or 8 digits HS-codes, as is <strong>the</strong> case with trade <strong>in</strong> goods.<strong>Software</strong>Although software is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational merch<strong>and</strong>ise trade statistics, relevant trade dataare difficult to ga<strong>the</strong>r. This is because only <strong>the</strong> trade <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> medium that conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> software ismeasured. As this ma<strong>in</strong>ly concerns consumer products, software for bus<strong>in</strong>ess purposes is hardlydealt with.<strong>IT</strong> servicesIn general, <strong>in</strong>ternational (trade) statistics of services are also hard to measure. This is <strong>the</strong> casefor imports as well as for exports of <strong>IT</strong> services. As an <strong>in</strong>dication, <strong>IT</strong> services are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>trade <strong>in</strong> services statistics of <strong>the</strong> Balance of Payments (BOP) of many countries. <strong>IT</strong> servicesappear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g sections of <strong>the</strong> BOP-system (source UNCTAD):• Computer services (263)• Royalties <strong>and</strong> license fees (266).Focus on offshore/nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gThere are many practical challenges with <strong>the</strong>se def<strong>in</strong>itions. The import statistics just give a veryrough <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>and</strong> detailed statistics are lack<strong>in</strong>g. In fact, outsourc<strong>in</strong>g could be regarded as away of import<strong>in</strong>g software services by <strong>the</strong> EU-countries. For this reason, <strong>and</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ceoffshore/nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g forms a major opportunity for Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian exporters (as statedbefore), this market survey is about offshore/nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> particular.Classification of software outsourc<strong>in</strong>g nations15


16Table 2.2. shows “The 4-tier Taxonomy” model that has been developed <strong>and</strong> can be used toclassify software outsourc<strong>in</strong>g nations. This rigorous taxonomy is based on maturity, cluster<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> export revenues <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global market, <strong>and</strong> can be employed for comparative <strong>and</strong> benchmarkanalysis. The model’s tiers embrace a range of countries from <strong>the</strong> successful nations tocountries with little impact yet on <strong>the</strong> global market.Table 3.2 Taxonomy of Export<strong>in</strong>g NationsTypeNationsTier 1 Major software export<strong>in</strong>g nations Mostly OECD nations such as <strong>the</strong>USA, UK, Germany, etc.Tier 2 Transition software export<strong>in</strong>gnationsTier 3 Emerg<strong>in</strong>g software export<strong>in</strong>gnationsTier 4 Infancy stage software export<strong>in</strong>gnationsSource: Caramel, E.B. (2003)New entrants <strong>in</strong>clude Irel<strong>and</strong>,Israel <strong>and</strong> IndiaOnly Russia <strong>and</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>aSouth Africa, Brazil, Mexico, <strong>the</strong>Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, Malaysia, Pakistan,Pol<strong>and</strong>, Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, Romania,Bulgaria, Hungary, o<strong>the</strong>rsEgypt, Bangladesh, Vietnam,Iran, Indonesia, o<strong>the</strong>rs4 Dem<strong>and</strong> for <strong>Software</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EUDEMAND FOR SOFTWAREThe total market for software products <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU amounted to €76 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g12.9% compared to 2004. The market was expected to realise a solid growth of ano<strong>the</strong>r 6.6% <strong>in</strong>2007 8 . The market consists of system software (€40.5 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006) <strong>and</strong> application software(€35.1 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006). System software was <strong>the</strong> largest grow<strong>in</strong>g segment, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g 14%compared to 2004. For 2007 <strong>the</strong> system software market was expected to grow by 7% to €43billion. The market for application software <strong>in</strong>creased 11.6% compared to 2004. In 2007, <strong>the</strong>market for application software was expected to rise to €37.2 billion (plus 5.9%).When study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Top 200 software vendors present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> market, it is clear thatAmerican software vendors are omnipresent (73 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Top 200, 53 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Top 100, <strong>and</strong> 8 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Top 10), thanks <strong>in</strong> particular to <strong>the</strong>ir position<strong>in</strong>g on software <strong>in</strong>frastructure tools. The three o<strong>the</strong>rlarge countries are Germany (12%), <strong>the</strong> United K<strong>in</strong>gdom (UK) (5%) <strong>and</strong> France (5%).Germany’s position is unique, as it <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> worldwide leader <strong>in</strong> enterprise applications,SAP, which represents 69% of Germany’s weight <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Top 200.Germany was <strong>the</strong> largest EU-market for software products <strong>in</strong> 2006, amount<strong>in</strong>g to almost €17billion. This is an <strong>in</strong>crease of 9.2% compared to 2004. It was followed by <strong>the</strong> UK, with a total of8 Data for 2007 are not available yet.16


17€15.5 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g 17.6% compared to 2004. Ranked third was France (€12.7billion <strong>in</strong> 2006, <strong>in</strong>crease of 15.3% compared to 2004).The fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g countries between 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2006 <strong>in</strong> applications were <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic(+40%), Pol<strong>and</strong> (+36%) <strong>and</strong> Slovakia (+34%). For <strong>the</strong> future (2006-2008), <strong>the</strong> strongest growth<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> applications market is expected <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong> (+30%), Slovakia (+24%), Bulgaria (+24%) <strong>and</strong>Romania (+24%). For <strong>the</strong> systems market, Pol<strong>and</strong> (+37%), Slovakia (+35%) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> CzechRepublic (+34%) have shown <strong>the</strong> strongest growth between 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2006. In <strong>the</strong> near future(’06-’08), Pol<strong>and</strong> (+25%), <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic (+22%) <strong>and</strong> Bulgaria (+22%) will show <strong>the</strong> fastestgrowth. For figures of all EU27 countries, please refer to Table 3.1.Table 4.1 EU software market, by member state, € million, 20062006 Systems ApplicationSystems Application Growth’04-‘06Growth’06-‘08*Growth’04-‘06Growth’06-‘08*EU total 40,531 35,102 14% 15% 15% 12%Germany 8,664 8,306 9% 12% 11% 12%United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 8,597 7,039 18% 17% 33% 12%France 7,073 5,655 15% 13% 12% 11%Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s 2,878 2,465 15% 17% 10% 13%Italy 2,680 2,357 6% 13% 3% 8%Spa<strong>in</strong> 1,723 799 16% 16% 19% 11%Switzerl<strong>and</strong> 1,458 1,333 14% 14% 10% 13%Sweden 1,393 1,425 17% 17% 10% 12%Belgium/Luxemburg 925 989 15% 16% 10% 11%Austria 872 722 13% 14% 11% 12%Denmark 842 834 17% 17% 11% 12%F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> 754 603 15% 15% 11% 12%Norway 722 599 19% 18% 12% 12%Pol<strong>and</strong> 410 440 37% 25% 36% 30%Czech Republic 295 303 34% 22% 40% 21%Portugal 291 240 14% 16% 11% 13%Irel<strong>and</strong> 284 265 15% 12% 14% 16%Greece 220 166 10% 6% 15% 18%Hungary 208 236 16% 18% 17% 20%Slovakia 69 83 35% 22% 34% 24%Romania 61 72 33% 20% 33% 24%Slovenia 44 57 22% 18% 24% 21%Lithuania 20 31 33% 20% 24% 19%Bulgaria 18 33 29% 22% 32% 24%Latvia 17 27 21% 18% 17% 22%Estonia 13 23 8% 15% 15% 13%Malta n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.Cyprus n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.*forecastsSource: E<strong>IT</strong>O (2007)DEMAND FOR <strong>IT</strong> SERVICESThe total market for <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU was valued at €140 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006, a growth of 11%compared to 2004. Growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services is anticipated to reach €156 billion (plus 11%) <strong>in</strong> 2008.Overall, outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> managed services will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> drivers of marketgrowth. This trend, however, shows strong geographic differences, with considerably more17


18contract activity <strong>in</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Europe than <strong>in</strong> Central or Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Europe <strong>and</strong> with Germany <strong>and</strong>Italy cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to show ra<strong>the</strong>r disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g performances. The EU <strong>IT</strong> services market issubdivided <strong>in</strong>to professional services <strong>and</strong> support services. E<strong>IT</strong>O only supplied figures for <strong>IT</strong>services without a fur<strong>the</strong>r specification <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> two different sectors with<strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services(professional services <strong>and</strong> support services).Figure 4.1 EU <strong>IT</strong> services market <strong>in</strong> € million, 2004-20081801601401201008060402002004 2005 2006 2007 2008Source: E<strong>IT</strong>O (2007)E<strong>IT</strong>O has ga<strong>the</strong>red data on professional <strong>and</strong> support services for <strong>the</strong> former EU15 countries. For<strong>the</strong> new EU members, <strong>the</strong> data consist of a total figure for <strong>IT</strong> services. Therefore, <strong>the</strong>re are twoseparate tables for <strong>the</strong>se services (Table 3.2 for <strong>the</strong> EU15 <strong>and</strong> Table 3.3 for <strong>the</strong> new EUmembers).EU15 countriesThe UK was <strong>the</strong> largest EU-market for <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>in</strong> 2006 (as <strong>in</strong> 2005), amount<strong>in</strong>g to almost €31billion, an <strong>in</strong>crease of 14% compared to 2004. Germany was <strong>the</strong> second largest market (€28billion <strong>in</strong> 2006, an <strong>in</strong>crease of 12% compared to 2004), followed by France (€26.5 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006,an <strong>in</strong>crease of 12% compared to 2004), Italy (almost €10 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006, an <strong>in</strong>crease of 1%compared to 2004) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s (€7 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006, an <strong>in</strong>crease of 11% compared to2004).The fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g countries between 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2006 <strong>in</strong> professional <strong>IT</strong> services were Spa<strong>in</strong>(+19%), Irel<strong>and</strong> (+15%) <strong>and</strong> Greece (+15%). In <strong>the</strong> near future (2006-2008), <strong>the</strong> countries with<strong>the</strong> fastest growth <strong>in</strong> professional <strong>IT</strong> services will aga<strong>in</strong> be Spa<strong>in</strong> (+18%), Irel<strong>and</strong> (+15%) <strong>and</strong>Greece (+15%). For support services, Spa<strong>in</strong> (+19%), Austria (+13%) <strong>the</strong> UK (+12%) <strong>and</strong> Greece(+12%) have shown <strong>the</strong> strongest growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 2004-2006. For <strong>the</strong> period 2006-2008,Spa<strong>in</strong> (+19%), Greece (+14%) <strong>and</strong> Norway (+12%) are expected to realise <strong>the</strong> highest growthfigures. Refer to Table 3.2 for more <strong>in</strong>formation.Table 4.2 <strong>IT</strong> services by EU15 country <strong>in</strong> € million, 20062006 Professional Support18


19Professional Support Growth’04-‘06Growth’06-‘08*Growth’04-‘06Growth’06-‘08*EU15 total 99,918 35,803 12% 13% 7% 9%United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 22,544 8,520 14% 11% 12% 11%Germany 20,680 7,387 12% 13% 3% 1%France 19,204 7,320 12% 12% 8% 9%Italy 7,051 2,813 1% 6% -2% 2%Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s 5,713 1,340 11% 12% 9% 10%Spa<strong>in</strong> 3,916 1,479 19% 18% 19% 19%Sweden 3,816 1,421 10% 11% 8% 8%Switzerl<strong>and</strong> 3,587 1,196 8% 11% 5% 7%Belgium/Luxemb 2,790 1,044 11% 12% 7% 9%urgAustria 2,552 864 14% 4% 13% 3%Norway 2,316 771 13% 14% 10% 12%Denmark 2,306 819 11% 8% 11% 8%F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> 1,712 507 9% 12% 9% 10%Portugal 658 213 9% 12% 7% 8%Irel<strong>and</strong> 645 209 15% 15% 11% 11%Greece 517 251 15% 15% 12% 14%Source: CBI Market Information Database* forecasts, source: E<strong>IT</strong>O (2007)”New” EU membersPol<strong>and</strong> (€1.5 billion) is <strong>the</strong> new EU member with <strong>the</strong> highest value <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services. Pol<strong>and</strong> isfollowed by <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic (€1 billion) <strong>and</strong> Hungary (€700 million). When look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong>growth figures <strong>in</strong> Table 3.3, all countries show double digit growth. Pol<strong>and</strong> (+52%), Romania(+41%) <strong>and</strong> Slovakia (+38%) showed <strong>the</strong> strongest growth <strong>in</strong> this period. For <strong>the</strong> period ’06-’08,aga<strong>in</strong> double digit growth is expected for all countries, with Romania (+36%), Pol<strong>and</strong> (+35%)<strong>and</strong> Estonia (+30%) show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fastest growth (refer to Table 3.3).Table 4.3 <strong>IT</strong> services by new EU member <strong>in</strong> € million, 20062006 Growth’04-‘06Growth’06-‘08New EU total 4,204 34% 27%Pol<strong>and</strong> 1,570 52% 35%Czech Republic 1,017 27% 21%Hungary 689 17% 19%Slovakia 288 38% 26%Slovenia 196 12% 11%Romania 191 41% 36%Latvia 69 28% 28%Lithuania 64 28% 28%Bulgaria 63 24% 29%Estonia 57 27% 30%malta n.a. n.a. n.a.Cyprus n.a. n.a. n.a.19


20Source: E<strong>IT</strong>O (2007)MARKET TRENDS FOR SOFTWAREApplication software will be ma<strong>in</strong>ly shaped by <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g trends:• The market for Enterprise Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g (ERP) is expected to show healthy growththroughout 2007-2008. Vendors are show<strong>in</strong>g good results thanks to cont<strong>in</strong>uous dem<strong>and</strong> forboth upgrades <strong>and</strong> new <strong>in</strong>stallations. Growth is ma<strong>in</strong>ly driven by product categories such asf<strong>in</strong>ancials, human capital management <strong>and</strong> procurement.• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Performance Management (BPM), collaboration <strong>and</strong> compliance are three areas <strong>in</strong>which companies are <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to launch <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> short run.Compliance (with rules <strong>and</strong> regulations) needs to become an enterprise-wide concept. Forthis reason, compliance <strong>in</strong>vestments are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly coupled with BPM <strong>and</strong> enterprisegovernance needs. Spend<strong>in</strong>g on analytics tools will <strong>the</strong>refore show high growth rates as <strong>the</strong>yrepresent <strong>the</strong> most important element <strong>in</strong> order to deploy data for both compliance <strong>and</strong>performance monitor<strong>in</strong>g issues.• Collaborative applications are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> importance. The most important areas of growthare <strong>in</strong>tegrated collaborative environments as well as st<strong>and</strong>-alone collaborative applications.There will be specific growth <strong>in</strong> content management platforms, product <strong>in</strong>formationmanagement, enterprise portals <strong>and</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g environments.• Supply Cha<strong>in</strong> Management (SCM) will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to <strong>in</strong>crease its importance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sector.• Customer Relationship Management (CRM) is expected to attract special attention,especially <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>surance <strong>in</strong>dustries. New delivery channels <strong>and</strong> an alteredway of conduct<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess as a result of <strong>in</strong>creased competition creates a need for f<strong>in</strong>ancial<strong>in</strong>stitutions to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> more <strong>in</strong>novative solutions that help <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong>teract better withcustomers.The system software area will be characterised by <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g trends:• Security is an important issue. Terrorism <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly sophisticated phish<strong>in</strong>g attacks arejust two examples of problems that companies need to address. Therefore, modern<strong>in</strong>frastructure software, storage replications solutions, antivirus protection <strong>and</strong> firewalls willsee notable dem<strong>and</strong>.• <strong>IT</strong> simplification <strong>and</strong> optimisations are priorities, especially for large companies. <strong>IT</strong>optimisation can lead to cost reduction through lower ma<strong>in</strong>tenance costs while simplificationcan ensure better <strong>IT</strong> quality <strong>and</strong> can <strong>the</strong>refore lead to improved products <strong>and</strong> services,happier customers <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased revenues.• Dem<strong>and</strong> for Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Intelligence (BI) tools will show healthy growth. The BI softwaremarket is a matur<strong>in</strong>g market <strong>and</strong> BI tools will <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>ir way <strong>in</strong>to midsizecompanies across <strong>the</strong> EU marketplace. A shift can also be seen from st<strong>and</strong>-alone BIsolutions to embedd<strong>in</strong>g BI <strong>in</strong> all bus<strong>in</strong>ess processes. F<strong>in</strong>ancial services, retail,manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> government are <strong>the</strong> largest vertical markets for BI software solutions.• Investments <strong>in</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Oriented Architecture (SOA) are cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to show healthy growthrates. The reasons for this growth are <strong>the</strong> need to speed up <strong>the</strong> development <strong>and</strong>deployment of new bus<strong>in</strong>ess solutions, <strong>the</strong> need for improv<strong>in</strong>g quality of <strong>IT</strong> systems <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>expectations for a considerable cost reduction as a result of us<strong>in</strong>g a SOA approach.• Protection <strong>and</strong> management of data is an important concern for EU organisations. Thecont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> storage software proves this. Revenues <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> storage softwaremarkets are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g at double-digit growth rates. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>and</strong> disasterrecovery, regulatory <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards compliance <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation life-cycle management are20


21important issues with<strong>in</strong> EU organisations. Therefore, <strong>the</strong>y <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> this area. Additionally,<strong>the</strong>se bus<strong>in</strong>ess issues are re<strong>in</strong>forced by <strong>the</strong> more technical trends of archiv<strong>in</strong>g (which isimportant to cut storage costs <strong>and</strong> ensure compliance), cont<strong>in</strong>uous data protection (which isa vital part of bus<strong>in</strong>ess cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>and</strong> disaster recovery), <strong>and</strong> concern about <strong>the</strong> security of<strong>in</strong>formation assets. The fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g sub-market is replication software. So far, <strong>the</strong> use ofreplications software has been limited to disaster recovery of critical systems. With <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g adoption of low-cost hardware, application software will <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly be used forbackup <strong>and</strong> archive purposes.MARKET TRENDS FOR <strong>IT</strong> SERVICES<strong>IT</strong> services will ma<strong>in</strong>ly be characterised by <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g trends:• Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g market segment, despite a tendency towardssmaller (narrower scope, lower-priced) <strong>and</strong> shorter deals.• Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g segments that drive overall market growth <strong>in</strong>clude Application Management(AM) outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, Network <strong>and</strong> Desktop Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g (NDOS), Information System (IS)outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> host<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure services.• Despite a multi-sourc<strong>in</strong>g trend <strong>in</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, many companies still prefer a strategicrelationship with one supplier outsourc<strong>in</strong>g services.• As a result of <strong>the</strong> focus on bus<strong>in</strong>ess efficiency consult<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> system <strong>in</strong>tegration will rema<strong>in</strong>important. <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestments will <strong>in</strong>volve all aspects of bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> an organisation, companiesare not only look<strong>in</strong>g for a strictly technical <strong>IT</strong> solution.• <strong>Software</strong> as a service (SaaS) which <strong>in</strong>cludes software on dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> hosted applicationmanagement (hosted AM) is an addition to exist<strong>in</strong>g applications. SaaS will <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>importance because it can offer <strong>in</strong>creased flexibility, provid<strong>in</strong>g both <strong>the</strong> chance to accessbus<strong>in</strong>ess functions remotely <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> possibility to pay-per-use.• Offshore sourc<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> importance rapidly <strong>and</strong> it is more accepted <strong>in</strong> applicationservices than <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure services. S<strong>in</strong>ce large parts of <strong>in</strong>frastructure outsourc<strong>in</strong>g can beoffshored, with time <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased experience on <strong>the</strong> side of <strong>the</strong> vendors, this area is alsoexpected to grow <strong>in</strong> importance. Customers are also becom<strong>in</strong>g used to <strong>the</strong> fact thatoperations can take place offshore <strong>and</strong> nearshore. Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Europe is less likely to acceptoffshor<strong>in</strong>g than nor<strong>the</strong>rn Europe, but large <strong>and</strong> mid-sized companies from Sou<strong>the</strong>rn<strong>European</strong> countries are also start<strong>in</strong>g to use <strong>the</strong> opportunity. A good option is to choose for anearshore option first, because <strong>the</strong> cultural similarities will overcome many of <strong>the</strong> barriers.The right mix of onshore, nearshore <strong>and</strong> offshore locations will be critical, not only to enlarge<strong>the</strong> customer base but also to spread geographical risk <strong>and</strong> use <strong>the</strong> advantages of differentcompetences <strong>and</strong> time zones.OPPORTUN<strong>IT</strong>IES (+) AND THREATS (-)+ With<strong>in</strong> software applications ERP, BPM, collaborative applications, supply cha<strong>in</strong>management <strong>and</strong> CRM offer good opportunities on <strong>the</strong> market. This can also provideopportunities for SMEs <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e that want to be active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU market for <strong>the</strong>sesoftware applications.+ With<strong>in</strong> system software security, <strong>IT</strong> simplification <strong>and</strong> optimisation, data protection <strong>and</strong>data management <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>telligence tools show healthy growth. This also offersopportunities for SMEs from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e that want to be active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU market for <strong>the</strong>seservices.21


22+ Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g is still <strong>the</strong> most important growth driver. Toge<strong>the</strong>r with outsourc<strong>in</strong>g,offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g also come more <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> picture. This offers good opportunitiesfor SMEs from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. Obligatory tender<strong>in</strong>g for projects of governmental <strong>in</strong>stitutions makes it difficult to apply forSMEs from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e.5 Supply of <strong>Software</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>Services</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EUThis section discusses <strong>the</strong> “production” of software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU. However, software<strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services can hardly be called products. In this case it is better to talk about “supply”.SIZE OF SUPPLYDetailed <strong>and</strong> up-to-date supply data for software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services are very hard to provide. Onlysome rough <strong>in</strong>dications can be given by, for example, <strong>the</strong> supply statistics of <strong>IT</strong> servicecompanies <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir employment level by country <strong>in</strong> 2001. This may be ‘old’ <strong>in</strong>formation, but atleast it gives <strong>in</strong>formation about all 27 EU countries, enabl<strong>in</strong>g a comparison between <strong>the</strong>m.In 2001, <strong>IT</strong> service companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> large EU countries like France, Germany, Italy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> UKgenerated more than 70% of <strong>the</strong> production value <strong>and</strong> added value <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU25. In contrast, <strong>IT</strong>services companies of <strong>the</strong> new EU member states had almost no importance for <strong>the</strong> sector <strong>in</strong>2001. This situation, however, has changed. Many Eastern <strong>European</strong> <strong>IT</strong> service companies arecurrently offer<strong>in</strong>g outsourc<strong>in</strong>g services (nearshor<strong>in</strong>g) to West <strong>European</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses. More<strong>in</strong>formation is provided <strong>in</strong> table 4.1.Table 5.1 Production value of <strong>IT</strong> services, value <strong>and</strong> employment, 2001 (EU 25)Production value<strong>in</strong> € millionProduction value% of EU-25No. of personsemployedEU* 261,799 100% 2,383,666United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 69,379 27% 576,733Germany 51,825 20% 379,175France 36,704 14% 335,532Italy 30,782 12% 340,373Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s 14,902 6% 138,257Sweden 13,613 5% 121,323Spa<strong>in</strong> 10,928 4% 165,489Belgium 7,411 3% 49,446Irel<strong>and</strong> 5,303 2% 22,260Denmark 5,200 2% 45,984Austria 4,118 2% 38,759F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> 3,705 1% 37,505Pol<strong>and</strong> 2,463 1% n.a.Czech Republic 1,424 1% 43,031Portugal 1,186 1% 17,297Hungary 1,154 0% 42,237Luxembourg 566 0% 4,804Slovakia 372 0% 11,616Slovenia 335 0% n.a.Latvia 120 0% 4,534Lithuania 96 0% 4,07022


23Estonia 84 0% 2,804Cyprus 75 0% 1,269Malta 52 0% 1,168* EU without Greece, Romania <strong>and</strong> BulgariaSource: E-Bus<strong>in</strong>esswatch (2005)TRENDS IN SUPPLY• ConsolidationTriggered by <strong>the</strong> long-last<strong>in</strong>g economic downturn after <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> dot-com boom, rivalry<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services market has significantly <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past years. The recentconsolidation process <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> software market, for example, has driven mergers & acquisitiondynamics <strong>and</strong> led to headl<strong>in</strong>es like “In <strong>the</strong> flat enterprise software market <strong>the</strong> message isclear: It is time to hunt or to be hunted”. A prom<strong>in</strong>ent example of this development was <strong>the</strong>hostile takeover of PeopleSoft by Oracle (both active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ERP market). As a consequence,<strong>IT</strong> services companies have to deal with a cont<strong>in</strong>uously chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry structure.• Open sourceThe use of open source software <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards is promoted more <strong>and</strong> more. Evengovernments promote <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong>se “free” software sources <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards. The operat<strong>in</strong>gsystem L<strong>in</strong>ux is ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ground on “paid” systems like Microsoft W<strong>in</strong>dows.• Nearshore / offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gThe labour costs per employee of <strong>IT</strong> enterprises <strong>in</strong> countries like Pol<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Czech Republicor Hungary used to be only about one third of those <strong>in</strong> companies <strong>in</strong> most former EU15countries. These low labour costs toge<strong>the</strong>r with relatively good technical <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guisticexpertise provide <strong>IT</strong> companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se countries with <strong>the</strong> opportunity to offer nearshoreservices. A successful establishment of Eastern <strong>European</strong> nearshore providers could, <strong>in</strong>turn, accelerate <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease of wages with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU. Nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations (ma<strong>in</strong>ly forFrance) can also be found <strong>in</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Africa (e.g. Morocco <strong>and</strong> Tunisia).OPPORTUN<strong>IT</strong>IES (+) AND THREATS (-)In a period when cost cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> at <strong>the</strong> same time deliver<strong>in</strong>g good (superior) quality <strong>and</strong>access to skilled employees are <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> issues, companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly acceptnear- <strong>and</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g. This is an opportunity for SMEs <strong>in</strong> DCs as <strong>the</strong>y can be found <strong>in</strong>nearshore <strong>and</strong> offshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations.± The fast development of Eastern Europe can be a problem for DCs <strong>in</strong> offshore dest<strong>in</strong>ationsas it <strong>in</strong>creases competition. Of course it is an opportunity for DCs <strong>in</strong> nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations. For small DC suppliers, <strong>in</strong>creased competition due to market consolidation can be a threat. Open source software replaces o<strong>the</strong>r (paid) software systems. This is a threat for DCsuppliers as <strong>the</strong>se services are also supplied by <strong>the</strong>m.6 The Offshore/Nearshore Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Market <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU23


24This section specifically focuses on offshore / nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> service.As reliable <strong>and</strong> recent statistics on imports of software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services are hardly available, thissection gives an overview of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> developments <strong>and</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> servicesnearshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU).Because of <strong>the</strong> lack of reliable statistical <strong>in</strong>dicators on global outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> results of marketresearch, on-off surveys <strong>and</strong> case studies have been studied for relevant <strong>in</strong>formation. Thesesources may be coloured, ei<strong>the</strong>r positively or negatively, by <strong>the</strong> specific <strong>in</strong>terests of <strong>the</strong>agencies. Estimates of <strong>the</strong> impact on Europe are vague, especially <strong>in</strong> relation to offshor<strong>in</strong>g tosmaller Asian countries <strong>and</strong> Eastern <strong>European</strong> states. But almost all sources agree: <strong>the</strong><strong>European</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g market is boom<strong>in</strong>g.OVERVIEW OF EU OFFSHORE / NEARSHORE OUTSOURCING MARKETAccord<strong>in</strong>g to Gartner (2006) 9 , <strong>European</strong>-based companies will fuel <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> offshoreoutsourc<strong>in</strong>g with a 50% year-on-year rise <strong>in</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> world market <strong>in</strong> 2006 <strong>and</strong> 2007. ForEurope as a whole, Forrester Research 10 forecasts a susta<strong>in</strong>ed but moderate growth. <strong>European</strong>spend<strong>in</strong>g will achieve an average growth of 6% over 5 years <strong>and</strong> <strong>European</strong> companies willspend a total of €146 billion <strong>in</strong> 2011. Forrester <strong>and</strong> Gartner obviously present different forecasts<strong>and</strong> data. Their work<strong>in</strong>g methods may differ or <strong>the</strong>y may use a different def<strong>in</strong>ition of offshoreoutsourc<strong>in</strong>g. This could expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> difference <strong>in</strong> data <strong>the</strong>y present.Globally, <strong>the</strong> percentage of companies us<strong>in</strong>g high levels of offshore / nearshore activity is set to<strong>in</strong>crease from 13 to 20% <strong>in</strong> 2008-2009. <strong>European</strong> companies will be <strong>the</strong> first to act when newmarkets open up. Dem<strong>and</strong> is largest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nordic countries. As stated earlier, <strong>the</strong>activity is considerably less <strong>in</strong> Central <strong>and</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Europe.The UK <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong> spend a large part of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>IT</strong>-budgets on offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g. This isma<strong>in</strong>ly due to <strong>the</strong> lower language barrier <strong>the</strong>y have to a country like India. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> largest<strong>in</strong>crease is expected to come from <strong>the</strong>se countries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> near future. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to ForresterResearch, <strong>the</strong> UK will account for three quarters of all <strong>European</strong> offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nextfive years. The companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nordic countries are more attracted to nearshor<strong>in</strong>g. Thepresence of a mature nearshore market <strong>in</strong> Eastern Europe <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic States is <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>reason for this. Sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>European</strong> countries are less keen on offshore <strong>and</strong> nearshoreoutsourc<strong>in</strong>g. Especially France is not so eager to engage <strong>in</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g.<strong>IT</strong> jobs go<strong>in</strong>g offshore<strong>IT</strong> jobs will move offshore most rapidly from <strong>the</strong> UK with cont<strong>in</strong>ental <strong>European</strong> countriesmatch<strong>in</strong>g that trend but at a lower level of impact. Across <strong>the</strong> whole of Europe, Forrester expectsthat almost 150,000 pure <strong>IT</strong> jobs will move offshore by 2015 (see Table 5.1).Table 6.1 <strong>IT</strong> jobs mov<strong>in</strong>g offshore by country, 2005-20152005* 2010* 2015*Total 37,482 85,731 150,304UK 26,728 48,597 87,474Germany 2,733 10,163 17,091France 1,480 9,051 15,447Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s 1,475 5,511 9,2369 A worldwide research <strong>and</strong> consultancy firm10 A worldwide research <strong>and</strong> consultancy firm24


25Italy 853 1,771 2,807Sweden 861 3,127 5,358Belgium 310 1,082 1,910Switzerl<strong>and</strong> 424 1,456 2,604Denmark 420 1,548 2,620Spa<strong>in</strong> 345 677 1,132Austria 313 1,218 1,980F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> 285 1,012 1,762Irel<strong>and</strong> 127 231 416Portugal 79 162 259Greece 34 67 111Luxembourg 16 58 98* forecastsSource: Forrester (2004)However, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se large markets <strong>the</strong> competition is fierce. In <strong>the</strong> UK alone, hundreds of offshoreservice providers are try<strong>in</strong>g to f<strong>in</strong>d clients. Small countries can be attractive because competitionis less fierce. Table 5.2 shows that even comput<strong>in</strong>g professionals will face job displacementoffshore.Table 6.2 Forecast: <strong>European</strong> <strong>IT</strong> jobs mov<strong>in</strong>g offshore by job type, 2004-20152004 2010* 2015*Information Technology total 30,855 85,731 150,304Comput<strong>in</strong>g professionals 24,151 65,951 118,712Junior comput<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>and</strong> operatives 6,705 19,780 31,592* ForecastSource: Forrester (2004)Which companies offshore / nearshoreFor most large <strong>European</strong> companies, outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g is becom<strong>in</strong>gcommon ground. This is not yet <strong>the</strong> case for most SMEs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU. Although still develop<strong>in</strong>gslowly, <strong>the</strong>re is a trend <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>European</strong> countries (such as Sweden, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s,Denmark <strong>and</strong> Germany) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK towards a greater <strong>in</strong>volvement of SMEs <strong>in</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g ofsoftware <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services. Offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g of software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services will be <strong>the</strong> nextstep for <strong>the</strong>se SMEs. In o<strong>the</strong>r countries such as Belgium France, Spa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Italy, SMEs are notready for offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g yet. In <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion of experts, <strong>the</strong> SMEs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se countries areonly just discover<strong>in</strong>g onshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g.In <strong>the</strong> UK, ECODE– <strong>European</strong> centre for offshore development- <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Outsourc<strong>in</strong>gAssociation have already tried to promote outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g to SMEs, so far still withoutmuch success. SMEs that are active <strong>in</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g or nearshor<strong>in</strong>g tended to be used to <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>ternational environment because of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>in</strong> (e.g. transportation). Mosto<strong>the</strong>r SMEs still have <strong>the</strong> old fashioned generic image of offshor<strong>in</strong>g. Their view of develop<strong>in</strong>gcountries is that <strong>the</strong>se have little knowledge <strong>and</strong> are <strong>in</strong>capable of offer<strong>in</strong>g high quality services.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to experts, fear of los<strong>in</strong>g control is an important constra<strong>in</strong>t on <strong>the</strong> propensity tooutsource <strong>and</strong> nearshore / offshore services. Experts state that it is a miscomprehension thatoutsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g is only for <strong>the</strong> larger companies. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to EUexperts, it is especially <strong>the</strong> smaller companies that have much to ga<strong>in</strong> from outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g.Contract duration25


26Most offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g projects with<strong>in</strong> software are short term project based contracts.For <strong>IT</strong> services, longer contracts are be<strong>in</strong>g used.Drivers <strong>and</strong> barriers for offshore / nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gRecent research has identified a range of driv<strong>in</strong>g factors for software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> service offshor<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g:• Cost differentials regard<strong>in</strong>g labour <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r costs,• Availability of labour <strong>and</strong> access to knowledge.Cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs has historically always been one of <strong>the</strong> most important drivers for offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>nearshor<strong>in</strong>g. In recent years a shift from costs toward quality, security <strong>and</strong> availability of a skilledlabour force can be seen.The most important barriers that are important for EU companies when offshor<strong>in</strong>g or nearshor<strong>in</strong>gare:• Cultural differences,• Language differences,• Lack of trust.In <strong>the</strong> EU, a trend can also be seen towards a fear of major job losses as a result of offshor<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g. In many countries, <strong>the</strong>re is pressure from unions <strong>and</strong> politics to safeguard jobs.However, experts state that <strong>the</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g of software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services does notnecessarily mean a job loss <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country that is offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g. Often <strong>the</strong> content ofjobs changes from development to project management. Most jobs are saved <strong>and</strong> sometimeseven more people are necessary to manage all outsourced processes.Offshore / nearshore potential per product groupApplication softwareAccord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>IT</strong> experts, <strong>the</strong> potential for offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g of software applications isvery high. The potential depends on <strong>the</strong> level of end-user <strong>in</strong>teraction that is needed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>development process. Development projects with a small need for end-user <strong>in</strong>teraction areeasier to offshore or nearshore. Application software is very sensitive to Intellectual PropertyProtection (IPP).Application outsourc<strong>in</strong>g is expected to be one of <strong>the</strong> quickest grow<strong>in</strong>g categories of <strong>IT</strong> servicesover <strong>the</strong> next five years. F<strong>in</strong>ancial service firms <strong>in</strong> countries like UK, Sc<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>avian countries <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s will be responsible for <strong>the</strong> major part of spend<strong>in</strong>g here (€17 billion <strong>in</strong> 2006 <strong>and</strong>€27.5 billion <strong>in</strong> 2011).There is no real difference between <strong>the</strong> potential for offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g. It depends on<strong>the</strong> need for doma<strong>in</strong> knowledge which country <strong>and</strong> company <strong>the</strong> EU company will choose.System softwareThe potential for offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>se software services is high. <strong>IT</strong> experts statethat <strong>the</strong>re are few companies <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries that are capable of provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>seservices. The ma<strong>in</strong> problem is <strong>the</strong> need for doma<strong>in</strong> knowledge. In reality, most systems stillcome from <strong>the</strong> US. For system software <strong>the</strong>re is no real difference <strong>in</strong> potential for offshore ornearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g.Professional <strong>IT</strong> services26


27Potential for offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>IT</strong> services depends on <strong>the</strong> amount of client<strong>in</strong>teraction that is needed. In consult<strong>in</strong>g, most companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU still prefer hav<strong>in</strong>g an EUconsultant or a person from <strong>the</strong> developed world; <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> potential for offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>nearshor<strong>in</strong>g of consultancy is not very high. This concerns trust <strong>and</strong> cultural differences. Inimplementation services <strong>the</strong>re are chances <strong>in</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g for configuration,development, test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> management. Although <strong>the</strong>se services have a good potential foroffshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>IT</strong> experts <strong>the</strong>re are only very few SMEs fromdevelop<strong>in</strong>g countries that are capable of provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se services. The same counts foroperations management. Although <strong>the</strong> potential for near / offshor<strong>in</strong>g is good, <strong>the</strong>re are only veryfew SMEs <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries that offer <strong>the</strong>se services.Support <strong>IT</strong> servicesChances for offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se services are <strong>the</strong> lowest with<strong>in</strong> software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong>services. These services depend more on languages <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical presence of ama<strong>in</strong>tenance man. In nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>the</strong> language barrier could be smaller. Thesenearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations, <strong>the</strong>refore, offer better chances for support <strong>IT</strong> services, but <strong>the</strong> overallpotential for offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g still rema<strong>in</strong>s low.Offshore / nearshore potential per countryIt is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to see that countries such as Germany <strong>and</strong> France qualify nearshor<strong>in</strong>g as moreimportant than offshor<strong>in</strong>g, especially for software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services for which <strong>the</strong> potential foroffshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g is not so high. This is ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to language <strong>and</strong> culturalresemblances. In <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>and</strong> Sweden this is less <strong>the</strong> case. This might alsohave to do with <strong>the</strong> fact that offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g are already more common <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>secountries. Belgium is not ready for offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> is a very specialcountry as it is profil<strong>in</strong>g itself as a nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ation for o<strong>the</strong>r EU countries.OUTSOURCING DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN EU COMPANIESTo give <strong>the</strong> exporter an idea on how decisions are made by EU companies that offshore /nearshore, this section discusses some of <strong>the</strong> most important decisive factors for EU companiesto offshore / nearshore <strong>and</strong>, more importantly, which dest<strong>in</strong>ation to choose. They are divided <strong>in</strong>tocountry-specific <strong>and</strong> service provider specific elements.Country-specific elements1 Cost sav<strong>in</strong>gCost sav<strong>in</strong>g is an important issue for EU companies to survive. The price is <strong>the</strong>refore animportant issue, although this does depend on <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> service. For example, languageproficiency is important for language-based services (e.g. help desk <strong>and</strong> service desk). Thelevels of doma<strong>in</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> skills generally also <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> possibility of cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs.2 Availability of skilled professionalsThe nature of <strong>the</strong> service determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> for specific skills. In general, <strong>the</strong> morecomplex <strong>the</strong> services, <strong>the</strong> higher <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> for highly skilled professionals.3 Language & cultureLanguage is important for both <strong>the</strong> provider <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> client to be able to communicate efficiently.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, culture is a very important issue. In <strong>the</strong> past, differences <strong>in</strong> culture led to problemsdur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> execution of projects. Language is a tremendous asset for some <strong>IT</strong> service providers.27


28For some o<strong>the</strong>r services, like software applications development <strong>and</strong> software systems, it is lessimportant. In programm<strong>in</strong>g a software application <strong>the</strong>re, is no need for specific language abilities.Many companies <strong>in</strong> Europe see language <strong>and</strong> cultural differences as a possible source ofproblems. As shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.1, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Germany perceive <strong>the</strong> most h<strong>in</strong>drancefrom <strong>the</strong>se differences; even <strong>in</strong> a typical offshor<strong>in</strong>g country like <strong>the</strong> UK, 56% of <strong>the</strong> companiesconsider <strong>the</strong>se differences to be a problem. The relatively low level of h<strong>in</strong>drance perceived byFrench companies is surpris<strong>in</strong>g. However, as most French companies offshore to Frenchspeak<strong>in</strong>g regions <strong>in</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Africa, <strong>the</strong> problems may also be smaller than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> EUwhere <strong>the</strong> language <strong>and</strong> cultural difference with offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g countries is oftenmuch larger.Figure 6.1 Cultural <strong>and</strong> language problems as obstacle for offshor<strong>in</strong>g, % of companies percountry90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%FranceGermanyThe Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>sUKSource: D<strong>eu</strong>tsche Bank research (2004) from Forrester (2006)4 Personal connectionOne of <strong>the</strong> most important factors driv<strong>in</strong>g outsourc<strong>in</strong>g decisions is <strong>the</strong> existence of a personalconnection between <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> client company <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> foreign country. A foreign officerwith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> client company <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU could very well favour outsourc<strong>in</strong>g. This is also calledengag<strong>in</strong>g “diaspora”.5 Political stabilityPolitical stability is an important issue for outsourc<strong>in</strong>g decisions. This is especially true forservices, as contractual relationships <strong>in</strong> this field often have a longer duration.6 Time zone differenceIn projects where communication is important, time zone differences could be an obstacle. It is<strong>the</strong> opposite for services, where this is regarded as one of <strong>the</strong> major benefits. S<strong>in</strong>ce operat<strong>in</strong>gnight shifts is expensive, offshore options have become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly attractive.7 Country imageOne of <strong>the</strong> largest barriers (or opportunities) for Ukra<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se services may be <strong>the</strong> countryimage.28


298 Western bus<strong>in</strong>ess practicesDespite hav<strong>in</strong>g good technical expertise, <strong>the</strong> lack of bus<strong>in</strong>ess, market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> managementknowledge can impede <strong>the</strong> smaller software provider with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. EU companies tendto select companies whose management team is tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> conducts bus<strong>in</strong>ess accord<strong>in</strong>g toWestern bus<strong>in</strong>ess practices <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards.9 Telecommunications <strong>in</strong>frastructureAlmost all <strong>IT</strong> services depend on voice <strong>and</strong> data telecommunication services. An EU companywould be look<strong>in</strong>g for an outsourc<strong>in</strong>g provider that has <strong>the</strong> availability of a reliable <strong>in</strong>frastructure.Moreover, <strong>the</strong> b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>and</strong> its costs are important issues as well.10 Government supportGovernment support plays a critical role <strong>in</strong> near/offshore outsorc<strong>in</strong>g. The degree of governmentsupport provided <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global market differs from country to country. Some countries likePhilipp<strong>in</strong>es have managed to raise large offshore <strong>in</strong>dustries with little or no government support.O<strong>the</strong>rs, notably market leaders as India <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>, have enjoyed great support from <strong>the</strong>irgovernments that has allowed <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry to progress faster. For example support <strong>in</strong> Indiaranges from provid<strong>in</strong>g education <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure facilities <strong>and</strong> technology parks,to sett<strong>in</strong>g up a M<strong>in</strong>istry of Information Technology <strong>and</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sector <strong>in</strong> a structuredmanner. Egypt is ano<strong>the</strong>r good example. Companies here are very well supported by <strong>the</strong>government <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir efforts to become active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU market. Countries than do not have agovernment support for <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> sector are at a disadvantage.11 Legal <strong>and</strong> regulatory environmentThe regulatory environment <strong>and</strong> legal framework of a country can offer protection to thosecompanies that utilize near/offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g resources.Service provider specific elementsAside from country-specific elements discussed earlier, when it comes to select<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> offshoreservice provider, some o<strong>the</strong>r elements may be applied. These <strong>in</strong>clude:1 Decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g authorityOne of <strong>the</strong> major issues that EU companies could consider is where <strong>the</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>gauthority is allocated with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> offshore service provider. For example, many Indian firms arestill Indian-centric, forc<strong>in</strong>g delays when major decisions must be made. Some customers mayconsider it necessary to get fast decisions under certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances, without hav<strong>in</strong>g to waitfor eight or sixteen hours.2 Doma<strong>in</strong> expertiseExpertise <strong>in</strong> specialised technologies can be an important asset for some service providers. Inboth software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services this is a very important requirement. The availability of specificdoma<strong>in</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> expertise highly <strong>in</strong>fluences <strong>the</strong> choice for a certa<strong>in</strong> company.3 Quality <strong>in</strong>itiativesQuality certification should play an important role with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>and</strong> Indian<strong>and</strong> Irish firms often use this to ga<strong>in</strong> competitive edge.4 Global presence29


30This will become more important <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future.5 O<strong>the</strong>r elementsO<strong>the</strong>r elements that affect <strong>the</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>in</strong>clude:• Ample project expertise,• Commitment,• Customer references,• End-user vs. product expertise,• F<strong>in</strong>ancial stability,• Flexibility on contract terms,• Innovative solutions,• Market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sales capability,• Ongo<strong>in</strong>g Research & Development (R&D),• Process methodologies,• Proven offshore methodologies,• References <strong>and</strong> reputation,• Size of vendor,• Specialities,• Staff retention,• Strategic plan <strong>and</strong> vision,• Superior service delivery.TRENDSOne of <strong>the</strong> most important trends <strong>in</strong> Europe is nearshor<strong>in</strong>g. Many <strong>European</strong> companies startchoos<strong>in</strong>g this option because of <strong>the</strong> geographical <strong>and</strong> cultural advantages. Ano<strong>the</strong>r importantpo<strong>in</strong>t is <strong>the</strong> greater sense of control over <strong>the</strong> outsourced process that EU companies feel <strong>in</strong> anearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ation. Nearshore countries with potential are: <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic, Hungary,Pol<strong>and</strong>, Slovakia, Russia, Romania, Bulgaria, <strong>the</strong> Baltic States, Egypt, Morocco <strong>and</strong> SouthAfrica. Although <strong>the</strong>se dest<strong>in</strong>ations might be more expensive than certa<strong>in</strong> Asian countries, costsis no longer <strong>the</strong> only important factor. It is <strong>the</strong> cultural fit with <strong>the</strong> customers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> closerl<strong>in</strong>guistic fit that is important. The ability to deliver more complex concepts is important too.Russia is also develop<strong>in</strong>g a niche <strong>in</strong> global <strong>IT</strong> <strong>and</strong> R&D offshor<strong>in</strong>g, based on its strong humanresources. The Czech Republic, Hungary, Pol<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Slovakia will profit from <strong>the</strong> advantage oflow costs, strong skills, <strong>the</strong> implementation of EU regulations <strong>and</strong> solid <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Romania,Bulgaria <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic States will offer <strong>the</strong> same skills at an even lower price <strong>and</strong> are <strong>the</strong>reforeexpected to see a flow of new <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> EU.O<strong>the</strong>r trends• Offshore / nearshore software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services outsourc<strong>in</strong>g is now accepted as normalbus<strong>in</strong>ess practice.• Security <strong>and</strong> Intellectual Property Protection are becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important.• Multi-sourc<strong>in</strong>g will emerge. Multi-sourc<strong>in</strong>g is characterised by mak<strong>in</strong>g use of severalsuppliers <strong>and</strong> supply markets to spread risks.• Growth, efficiency <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> availability of a skilled labour force will become more importantbeside cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs.• A significant <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> project management offices is expected because of multi-vendor,multi-model <strong>and</strong> multi-country contract<strong>in</strong>g that is com<strong>in</strong>g up.• India will streng<strong>the</strong>n its position by offer<strong>in</strong>g more extensive choices.• Many mergers <strong>and</strong> acquisitions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services market.• Integrated <strong>IT</strong>O <strong>and</strong> BPO deals will have mixed success.30


31OPPORTUN<strong>IT</strong>IES (+) AND THREATS (-) As <strong>the</strong> acceptance of offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g grows, chances for Ukra<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EUmarket are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g importance of multi-sourc<strong>in</strong>g offers opportunities for Ukra<strong>in</strong>e as companieswant to spread risks <strong>and</strong> divide projects <strong>in</strong>to pieces that are all managed by one of <strong>the</strong>companies. Price is no longer <strong>the</strong> only factor companies from Europe look at. This can be an opportunityfor companies that can offer high quality but are not able to offer <strong>the</strong> lowest prices. It canalso be a threat for companies that can only offer <strong>the</strong> lowest price <strong>and</strong> are unable to meet<strong>the</strong> higher quality requirements. India’s stronger position is an opportunity for Indian companies but a threat for companiesfrom o<strong>the</strong>r develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, <strong>in</strong> this from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e.7 Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Locations for <strong>Software</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>Services</strong>This section provides an overview of <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g countries for location of software<strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services outsourc<strong>in</strong>g. Exporters from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e can use this <strong>in</strong>formation to get a view of<strong>the</strong>ir competitive environment <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dicative manner.OVERVIEW OFFSHORE / NEARSHORE LOCATIONSThis subsection shows a global overview of offshore locations by us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g sources:• Global rank<strong>in</strong>g by AT Kearney,• Neo<strong>IT</strong> Offshore Attractiveness Index.These sources give an overview of <strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g countries for offshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nearshor<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> general. This means <strong>the</strong>y are not focused on software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services specifically, but can b<strong>eu</strong>sed for <strong>the</strong>se service groups.Table 6.1 shows a global overview of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> offshore countries, based on a study by ATKearney (2007). The A.T. Kearney Global <strong>Services</strong> Location Index analyses <strong>the</strong> top 50 serviceslocations worldwide aga<strong>in</strong>st 50 measurements <strong>in</strong> three major categories: cost (f<strong>in</strong>ancialattractiveness), people <strong>and</strong> skills availability, <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment. These categoriesreflect important drivers for offshor<strong>in</strong>g decisions Information on detailed measurements across<strong>the</strong>se three categories is provided <strong>in</strong> Annex 1 to this survey. The table can give Ukra<strong>in</strong>ianexporters some help <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir competitive position.Countries from Asia such as India, Malaysia, Thail<strong>and</strong>, Indonesia, <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gaporehave <strong>the</strong> highest total scores. Interest<strong>in</strong>g to see is <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>th place for Bulgaria, <strong>the</strong> onlynearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top 10. Chile <strong>and</strong> Brazil (both South America) are also rankedamong <strong>the</strong> top 10. The Asian countries are considered to be <strong>the</strong> top service locations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>world. In <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong> list <strong>the</strong> more nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations for Europe can be found. Theyare more attractive than most EU countries <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> USA.Table 7.1 A.T Kearney attractiveness of global services locations, 2007CountryF<strong>in</strong>ancialattractivenessPeople <strong>and</strong> skillsavailabilityBus<strong>in</strong>essenvironmentTotalscoreIndia 3.22 2.34 1.44 731


32Ch<strong>in</strong>a 2.93 2.25 1.38 6.56Malaysia 2.84 1.26 2.02 6.12Thail<strong>and</strong> 3.19 1.21 1.62 6.02Brazil 2.64 1.78 1.47 5.89Indonesia 3.29 1.47 1.06 5.82Chile 2.65 1.18 1.93 5.76Philipp<strong>in</strong>es 3.26 1.23 1.26 5.75Bulgaria 3.16 1.04 1.56 5.75Mexico 2.63 1.49 1.61 5.73S<strong>in</strong>gapore 1.65 1.51 2.53 5.68Slovakia 2.79 1.04 1.79 5.62Egypt 3.22 1.14 1.25 5.61Jordan 3.09 0.98 1.54 5.6Estonia 2.44 0.96 2.2 5.6Czech Republic 2.43 1.1 2.05 5.57Latvia 2.64 0.91 2 5.56Pol<strong>and</strong> 2.59 1.17 1.79 5.54Vietnam 3.33 0.99 1.22 5.54United Arab Emirates 2.73 0.86 1.92 5.51United States (tier two) 0.48 2.74 2.29 5.51Uruguay 2.95 0.98 1.54 5.47Argent<strong>in</strong>a 2.91 1.3 1.26 5.47Hungary 2.54 0.95 1.98 5.47Mauritius 2.84 1.04 1.56 5.44Tunisia 3.03 0.9 1.5 5.43Ghana 3.27 0.9 1.25 5.42Lithuania 2.6 0.83 1.98 5.42Sri Lanka 3.18 0.96 1.22 5.36Pakistan 3.23 1 1.11 5.34South Africa 2.52 1.18 1.6 5.3Jamaica 2.83 0.96 1.49 5.29Romania 2.88 0.87 1.53 5.28Costa Rica 3 0.86 1.36 5.22Canada 0.77 2.09 2.3 5.16Morocco 2.92 0.9 1.33 5.14Russia 2.61 1.38 1.16 5.14Israel 1.97 1.27 1.86 5.1Senegal 3.19 0.82 1.05 5.06Germany (tier two) 0.46 2.19 2.4 5.05Panama 2.88 0.75 1.4 5.02United K<strong>in</strong>gdom (tier0.5 2.16 2.35 5.01two)Spa<strong>in</strong> 1.18 1.71 2.06 4.95New Zeal<strong>and</strong> 1.53 1.12 2.25 4.91Australia 0.89 1.69 2.31 4.89Portugal 1.59 1.14 2.11 4.84Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 2.76 0.98 1.09 4.83France (tier two) 0.45 2.07 2.27 4.79Turkey 2.06 1.31 1.41 4.78Irel<strong>and</strong> 0.4 1.54 2.29 4.18Source AT Kearney (2007)Additional f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs:32


33 The wage cost advantages of offshore locations will last for at least ano<strong>the</strong>r 20 years. The relative cost advantage of <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g offshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations has decl<strong>in</strong>ed, while <strong>the</strong>irscores for people skills have <strong>in</strong>creased. It can be said that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> people skills hascompensated for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g labour costs. Failure to improve skills of <strong>the</strong> work force <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment will likely translateto a loss of competitiveness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fast-mov<strong>in</strong>g offshore / nearshore services bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Thisaga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong> shift from cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs as <strong>the</strong> most important reason to offshore /nearshore towards better quality <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> for a highly skilled labour force. India <strong>and</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be <strong>the</strong> best offshore locations by a wide marg<strong>in</strong>. Their decl<strong>in</strong>es<strong>in</strong> cost advantage are offset by improved talent <strong>and</strong> enhanced bus<strong>in</strong>ess environments. Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asian countries are <strong>the</strong> primary replacements for India <strong>and</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Countries likeMalaysia, Indonesia, <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, S<strong>in</strong>gapore, Thail<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Vietnam rank among <strong>the</strong> top20 locations. Newcomers <strong>in</strong> Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe are outgrow<strong>in</strong>g more established locations.Bulgaria, Slovakia <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic states move ahead, while <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic, Hungary<strong>and</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r slip or rema<strong>in</strong> unchanged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g. The Middle East <strong>and</strong> Africa appear to be <strong>the</strong> next frontier <strong>in</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g ascountries such as Egypt, Tunisia, Ghana, South Africa, Israel, Turkey <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> United ArabEmirates perform well. Egypt <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r North African nations stress <strong>the</strong>ir unique comb<strong>in</strong>ationof <strong>European</strong> language skills, technical proficiency <strong>and</strong> low wages.Ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g table to f<strong>in</strong>d out more <strong>in</strong>formation about competitors for Ukra<strong>in</strong>e companiesis Table 6.2. It details each country’s suitability on a variety of bus<strong>in</strong>ess factors. As shown, Indiaoffers practically every k<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>IT</strong>O service mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> table. Of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r develop<strong>in</strong>gcountries <strong>the</strong>re is not one that offers <strong>the</strong> same number of <strong>IT</strong>O services. When look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong>countries <strong>in</strong> Eastern <strong>and</strong> Central Europe it can also be said that <strong>the</strong>y offer a large number (most)of <strong>the</strong> services mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> table.When look<strong>in</strong>g at services alone, it shows that all countries offer CAD services. Practically everycountry present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> table also offers application management & support, multimedia &animation <strong>and</strong> web-based applications.Table 7.2 <strong>IT</strong>O competency-dest<strong>in</strong>ation matrix, 2005BrazilCanadaCh<strong>in</strong>aCzech Rep.HungaryIndiaIrel<strong>and</strong>MalaysiaMexicoPhilipp<strong>in</strong>esPol<strong>and</strong>RomaniaRussiaSouthAfricaCAD • • • • • • • • • • • • • •QA/test<strong>in</strong>g • • • • •Application • • • • • • • • • •Management& Support<strong>IT</strong> Consult<strong>in</strong>g • • • •System • • • • • • • •Integration/ EAIPackaged S/W • • • • •ImplementationS/W• • • • •LocalisationInfrastructure • • • •33


34Management<strong>Services</strong>E-bus<strong>in</strong>ess • • • • • •Embedded• • •TechnologyMultimedia & • • • • • • • • • • • •AnimationWeb-based • • • • • • • • • • •ApplicationsWireless• • • • •technologyEA (ERP, CRM, • • • • • •SCM, DW/DI,KM)Source: neo<strong>IT</strong> (2005)As an addition to this <strong>in</strong>dex, Neo<strong>IT</strong> also developed <strong>the</strong> ‘offshore location map’ (2005). Itcompared <strong>the</strong> most important offshore locations on <strong>the</strong>ir strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses (see Figure6.1 <strong>and</strong> Table 6.3)Figure 7.1 <strong>IT</strong>O <strong>and</strong> BPO Industry size <strong>in</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g dest<strong>in</strong>ation countries, 200434


35Source: neo<strong>IT</strong> (2005)35


36Table 7.3 Growth opportunities, threats <strong>and</strong> future prospects36


3737


38Nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>in</strong> Eastern Europe are ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> popularity among EU companies thatwant to outsource <strong>the</strong>ir software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services. These nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations have certa<strong>in</strong>advantages over offshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations like Asian countries. Especially German <strong>and</strong> Frenchcompanies mention <strong>the</strong> cultural <strong>and</strong> language aspects <strong>in</strong> Eastern Europe as important factors forchoos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se countries as a dest<strong>in</strong>ation for <strong>the</strong>ir outsourc<strong>in</strong>g projects. What’s more, <strong>the</strong>centralisation of many k<strong>in</strong>ds of services <strong>in</strong> a ra<strong>the</strong>r small area is an advantage that can be found<strong>in</strong> Eastern <strong>European</strong> nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations. Accord<strong>in</strong>g experts, nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations are alsoespecially <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g for SME companies. They feel more comfortable with <strong>the</strong>se nearshoredest<strong>in</strong>ations because of <strong>the</strong> geographical closeness <strong>and</strong> a better underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> EUculture. Nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations for French companies are often found <strong>in</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Africa.TRENDS• Nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations are appeal<strong>in</strong>g to EU (SME) companies.• In some develop<strong>in</strong>g countries (e.g. India) <strong>the</strong> labour pool starts to dry up.OPPORTUN<strong>IT</strong>IES (+) AND THREATS (-) The trend towards nearshor<strong>in</strong>g can be a good opportunity for nearshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations.However, for develop<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong> offshore dest<strong>in</strong>ations this can be a threat.The labour pool dry<strong>in</strong>g up can be an opportunity for countries that do not have <strong>the</strong>se problems. Itis a threat for countries like India that face <strong>the</strong> problem of a shortage <strong>in</strong> professionals.8 Distribution ChannelsIn general, <strong>the</strong> best possibilities for Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian exporters <strong>in</strong> software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services def<strong>in</strong>itely lie<strong>in</strong> offshore <strong>and</strong> nearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g. Supply<strong>in</strong>g software products on <strong>the</strong> EU market woulddem<strong>and</strong> such a huge <strong>in</strong>vestment of resources <strong>and</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g costs that no company or group ofcompanies could afford it. It is very difficult to build distribution <strong>and</strong> support channels. Nicheproducts are an exception. A specialist firm that can supply a specific piece of software for a keysector could have a chance of success. But even <strong>the</strong>n, market<strong>in</strong>g costs will be huge. Someimportant success factors would <strong>in</strong>clude:• Specialised software for a niche market.• A solid <strong>and</strong> proven global client base.• High-level support services.• Compet<strong>in</strong>g (price, features, quality, reliability, etc.) aga<strong>in</strong>st global market leaders <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir owncategory.In practice it becomes very clear that mult<strong>in</strong>ationals, like bank<strong>in</strong>g company ABN AMRO <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r large companies perform <strong>the</strong>ir outsourc<strong>in</strong>g processes on <strong>the</strong>ir own. They set up <strong>the</strong>ir ownoffices (captive offshor<strong>in</strong>g) or make agreements with o<strong>the</strong>r major outsourc<strong>in</strong>g providers. Thetrend towards multi-sourc<strong>in</strong>g as a way to spread risk, does make exceptions to this rule more<strong>and</strong> more common. However, for Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian exporters, <strong>the</strong> SMEs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU still form <strong>the</strong> besttarget group.A dist<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution channels <strong>in</strong> software offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> servicesoffshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g should be made. First, <strong>the</strong> level of education differs. Develop<strong>in</strong>gsoftware requires advanced technical knowledge, while only basic tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is needed for <strong>IT</strong>services. Second, language proficiency is a requirement <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>and</strong> not so much <strong>in</strong>software. Although English is <strong>the</strong> primary language <strong>in</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> for outsourc<strong>in</strong>g38


39services <strong>in</strong> languages such as German <strong>and</strong> French is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g (aga<strong>in</strong> especially <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong>services). An example of <strong>the</strong> need for language proficiency is on-l<strong>in</strong>e support.Third, <strong>the</strong> nature of both areas of outsourc<strong>in</strong>g differs. <strong>Software</strong> offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g is acommunication <strong>in</strong>tensive bus<strong>in</strong>ess, <strong>in</strong> which some programmers spend about 50% of <strong>the</strong>ir time<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with o<strong>the</strong>rs. It <strong>in</strong>volves an <strong>in</strong>teractive process of build<strong>in</strong>g, check<strong>in</strong>g, revis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>test<strong>in</strong>g. Almost every project is unique, requir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same time-<strong>in</strong>tensive attention. This differsfrom <strong>IT</strong> services. For <strong>IT</strong> services, <strong>the</strong> complexity is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> start-up process. Once <strong>the</strong> process isestablished, <strong>the</strong>re is far less need for communication. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> “end consumers” forsoftware are mostly EU software companies, while for <strong>IT</strong> services end users can be both EU <strong>IT</strong>services companies but also o<strong>the</strong>r EU companies <strong>in</strong> need of <strong>IT</strong> services. The level of education,language proficiency <strong>and</strong> communication that is needed will <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> trade structure ofsoftware <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services.SOFTWARE OUTSOURCINGFigure 7.1 shows <strong>the</strong> most common distribution channels for develop<strong>in</strong>g country offshor<strong>in</strong>g /nearshor<strong>in</strong>g service providers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU software <strong>in</strong>dustry.Figure 8.1 Distribution channel software offshor<strong>in</strong>g / nearshor<strong>in</strong>g<strong>Software</strong> company DCMiddle man(BrokerConsultant)Own Office/Captiveoffshor<strong>in</strong>gpartnership<strong>European</strong> (software) companyAny<strong>in</strong>dustrySource: Facts Figures Future (2007)Offshore <strong>and</strong> nearshore service providers <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e that are consider<strong>in</strong>g enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> EUmarket generally have five options: Partnership with an EU (software) company. Your own sales office <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU. Middle man. Direct to EU company. Captive offshor<strong>in</strong>g.Partnership with an EU (software) companyThis trade channel is considered as <strong>the</strong> best for SMEs from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. S<strong>in</strong>ce enter<strong>in</strong>g a market <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> EU is very difficult for SMEs from develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, hav<strong>in</strong>g a jo<strong>in</strong>t venture (or any o<strong>the</strong>rpartnership with an EU company) can make <strong>the</strong> entrance on a market much easier. A jo<strong>in</strong>t39


40venture is <strong>the</strong> establishment of a cooperation with a software provider <strong>in</strong> an EU country. Thisprovider <strong>the</strong>n offshores work to an SME from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. This is a good way to enter an EUcountry. Once you can prove that you already do work for a company from <strong>the</strong> EU country it ismuch easier to get o<strong>the</strong>r offshor<strong>in</strong>g projects. In <strong>the</strong> case of a jo<strong>in</strong>t venture it is <strong>the</strong> SME fromUkra<strong>in</strong>e that actively needs to search for possibilities to cooperate.Sales office <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EUEstablish<strong>in</strong>g a sales office <strong>in</strong> an EU member country is ano<strong>the</strong>r option. It could be wise to do this<strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t effort. For example, <strong>the</strong> government or <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry association might contribute to sucha presence, allow<strong>in</strong>g several companies at a time to profit from <strong>the</strong> office <strong>and</strong> facilities.Cooperation with a middlemanAno<strong>the</strong>r possibility is to cooperate with a middleman, a specialised broker <strong>and</strong>/or outsourc<strong>in</strong>gconsultant. In practice, <strong>the</strong>re are differences between <strong>the</strong>se two, as brokers more or less focuson matchmak<strong>in</strong>g. They typically establish relationships with multiple offshore providers, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>nchannel work to <strong>the</strong>se firms as <strong>the</strong>y acquire bus<strong>in</strong>ess. A disadvantage of a broker is that resultsare not guaranteed <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of no results <strong>the</strong> broker still has to be paid.Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g consultants have <strong>in</strong>-depth knowledge of <strong>the</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess, as well asextensive bus<strong>in</strong>ess networks that <strong>the</strong>y utilise to secure new contracts. Beside matchmak<strong>in</strong>g,consultants advise <strong>and</strong> provide a wide range of support services on <strong>the</strong> whole outsourc<strong>in</strong>gprocess as well.An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g example of a broker is <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Information Technology exchange (Euro<strong>IT</strong>X).It is a <strong>European</strong> one-stop-shop that provides <strong>in</strong>formation for both buyers <strong>and</strong> suppliers ofoffshore / nearshore software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> (enabled) services outsourc<strong>in</strong>g. Their websitehttp://www.<strong>eu</strong>roitx.com has three units: Intelligence, Market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Supply-Dem<strong>and</strong>. TheIntelligence unit conta<strong>in</strong>s, creates <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation, papers, external resources<strong>and</strong> news. The Market<strong>in</strong>g unit promotes <strong>the</strong> associated service providers from develop<strong>in</strong>gcountries. The Supply-Dem<strong>and</strong> unit manages <strong>and</strong> develops <strong>the</strong> database of company profiles.This database conta<strong>in</strong>s both suppliers <strong>and</strong> buyers. It focuses on suppliers from develop<strong>in</strong>gcountries <strong>and</strong> buyers from Europe.Work<strong>in</strong>g with an EU company directlyAlthough almost any <strong>in</strong>dustry could be a potential outsourcer of software development projects,<strong>in</strong> direct outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>European</strong> software companies <strong>the</strong>mselves are <strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g targetgroup for <strong>the</strong> exporter from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. Industries <strong>in</strong> Europe do not turn directly to service providers<strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries very often. Usually, EU <strong>in</strong>dustries contact an EU software company thatsometimes outsources <strong>the</strong> project partially or fully to develop<strong>in</strong>g countries.Captive offshor<strong>in</strong>gEspecially larger <strong>European</strong> software companies set up bus<strong>in</strong>esses <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<strong>the</strong>mselves. This is called captive offshor<strong>in</strong>g. In this model, <strong>European</strong> companies establishsubsidiaries abroad. This is useful if large amounts of software need to be created. For thispurpose, enterprises such as Philips, Vanenburg <strong>and</strong> Invensys/Baan have set up subsidiaries <strong>in</strong>India. The ABN Amro Bank (recently taken over by Banco Sant<strong>and</strong>er/Fortis/Royal bank ofScotl<strong>and</strong>) operates a software facility <strong>in</strong> Lahore (Pakistan). Ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>IT</strong>-firm recently set up anoffice <strong>in</strong> Kathm<strong>and</strong>u (Nepal).<strong>IT</strong> SERVICES OUTSOURCING40


41Figure 7.2 shows <strong>the</strong> most common distribution channels with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services outsourc<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dustry. It has <strong>the</strong> same options as software, although <strong>the</strong>re are some differences <strong>in</strong> extrapossibilities. For outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>IT</strong> services -as <strong>in</strong> software-, local presence by hav<strong>in</strong>g a salesoffice, a partnership with an EU <strong>IT</strong> services company or us<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>termediary(brokers/consultants) are <strong>the</strong> three most common channels as well. For example, TataConsultancy <strong>Services</strong>, one of <strong>the</strong> large Indian firms, has offices <strong>in</strong> many <strong>European</strong> cities.In general, it has been difficult for companies <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries to enter <strong>in</strong>to partnershipswith large service providers (system <strong>in</strong>tegrators) <strong>in</strong> Europe directly, such as CMG <strong>and</strong> CapGem<strong>in</strong>i or o<strong>the</strong>r large professional services companies like Accenture, Ernst & Young,Dimension Data, EDS, IBM, PWC Consult<strong>in</strong>g, Unisys <strong>and</strong> Xansa. Although <strong>the</strong>se companiesmay not actively promote <strong>the</strong>ir offshore capabilities, <strong>the</strong>y will make use of DC suppliers <strong>in</strong> orderto reduce project costs <strong>and</strong> shorten delivery time scales.Contrary to <strong>the</strong> software outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, exporters of <strong>IT</strong> services from Ukra<strong>in</strong>e couldcontact <strong>the</strong> end-user organisations, such as banks <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions, directly. Some of<strong>the</strong>se already use services from develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. These <strong>in</strong>clude, for example, companiesthat outsource data entry (BPO). They also tend to be larger <strong>and</strong> are frequently mult<strong>in</strong>ationalcorporations. However, this is probably not a viable model for new entrants <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>gfield s<strong>in</strong>ce most <strong>European</strong> companies enter <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>ir outsourc<strong>in</strong>g relationships through a<strong>European</strong>-based company. This is especially true for smaller companies.The follow<strong>in</strong>g pattern can be dist<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> purchas<strong>in</strong>g strategy of <strong>European</strong> companiesdivided by size:• The Fortune 1000 do bus<strong>in</strong>ess directly with offshore suppliers or have <strong>the</strong>ir own company.• The large caps (companies with a turnover of over €300 million) do bus<strong>in</strong>ess with offshoresuppliers, local <strong>in</strong>termediaries or local suppliers.• Large companies <strong>and</strong> medium sized companies do bus<strong>in</strong>ess with local <strong>in</strong>termediaries <strong>and</strong>local suppliers.Figure 8.2 Distribution channel outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>IT</strong> services<strong>IT</strong> service provider DCBroker /Consultant<strong>European</strong> <strong>IT</strong>companyOwnofficeEnd-user organisationSource: Facts Figures Future(2007)41


42Over <strong>the</strong> last decade, frontl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>IT</strong> services firms have relied on growth from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>side of <strong>the</strong>company. Through <strong>the</strong> 1990s, <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services firms set up global delivery centres bit-by- bit, on<strong>the</strong>ir own, across <strong>the</strong> world. Over <strong>the</strong> last four years, <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services firms have changed tack<strong>and</strong> are scal<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>the</strong>se centres to provide customers with a blended model: an on-shore, nearshore <strong>and</strong> off-shore capability, depend<strong>in</strong>g on what customers want.As an addition, outsourc<strong>in</strong>g service providers of software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services could use <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>gmodel as well. Local offices of mult<strong>in</strong>ationals <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> home country of <strong>the</strong> service provider couldbe used as a bridge to get <strong>in</strong>to contact with its o<strong>the</strong>r offices spread all over <strong>the</strong> world. Forexample: once an Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian service provider has worked for Shell <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, it could do <strong>the</strong>same job for Shell <strong>in</strong> EU country.9 PricesAs it is quite difficult for suppliers of software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services to give exact prices, it is also hardto obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation about current price levels. <strong>Software</strong> products can be broken down <strong>in</strong>tolicence prices per module <strong>and</strong> number of current or named users. The licence prices are usuallyfound on <strong>the</strong> websites of <strong>the</strong> software suppliers. Information on implementation costs can befound <strong>in</strong> reports concern<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess software, also giv<strong>in</strong>g ranges of costs for software <strong>and</strong>implementations. Outsourcers / exporters have access to this <strong>in</strong>formation by us<strong>in</strong>g severalsources. The ma<strong>in</strong> ones are:• CIO magaz<strong>in</strong>e- http://www.cio.com/archive/071506/2006_global_outsourc<strong>in</strong>g_guide.pdf• Everest Research Institute - http://www.everestresearch<strong>in</strong>stitute.com• Industry associations.• Neo<strong>IT</strong> - Offshore <strong>and</strong> Nearshore <strong>IT</strong>O <strong>and</strong> BPO Salary Report – http://www.neoit.com• Offices for statistics (per country).• Salary expert – http://www.salaryexpert.com - Choose <strong>the</strong> job position <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> country to see<strong>the</strong> salary level for that position <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country.• Trade press.• Visit<strong>in</strong>g trade fairs.• Websites of competitors.Neo<strong>IT</strong> predicts that prices for offshore / nearshore software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services will appreciateslightly. Offshore / nearshore service providers have demonstrated <strong>the</strong> ability to offer more thancost sav<strong>in</strong>gs to clients; bus<strong>in</strong>ess transformation opportunities are provided as well. As a result,established providers will be able to ask premium pric<strong>in</strong>g.But <strong>the</strong>re is also a price pressure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> offshore / nearshore market. The price pressure seemsto be particularly strong for <strong>IT</strong> services with low requirements on skills <strong>and</strong> experience. Inaddition, <strong>the</strong> consult<strong>in</strong>g company Meta Group expects decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g prices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditional softwaremarket (supply of st<strong>and</strong>ard software) of up to 35% by 2008 <strong>and</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r 15% by 2010.Therefore, <strong>IT</strong> service providers face a challenge to ei<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>d new ways of avoid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>competitive pressure on prices, or deal with it by lower<strong>in</strong>g costs. New developments <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fieldof <strong>IT</strong> <strong>and</strong> e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess may help meet <strong>the</strong>se challenges. The <strong>in</strong>tegration of open sourcecomponents or <strong>the</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g of development tasks to offshore providers, for example, arefrequently discussed strategies for focus<strong>in</strong>g on core competencies <strong>and</strong> lower<strong>in</strong>g costs.Wages for <strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g service providers <strong>in</strong> key offshore markets, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g India, Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong>Pol<strong>and</strong>, are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g by an average 8 to 11% per year, which is nearly half of what has been42


43commonly reported, accord<strong>in</strong>g to f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> 2006 by Everest Research Institute –an outsourc<strong>in</strong>gresearch <strong>in</strong>stitution. The lower figures reflect <strong>in</strong> part <strong>the</strong> efforts that offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>gsuppliers have been mak<strong>in</strong>g to control ris<strong>in</strong>g labour costs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> expansion of <strong>the</strong>iroperations <strong>in</strong>to second-tier, lower-cost cities <strong>and</strong> countries, as well as exchange rate movements<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r factors. Despite salary <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> key offshore markets, <strong>the</strong> idea that India <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rkey markets will price <strong>the</strong>mselves out of <strong>the</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> short run is unfounded.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to experts, <strong>the</strong> EU market will tolerate a small price <strong>in</strong>crease as price is no longer <strong>the</strong>only focal po<strong>in</strong>t for EU companies that want to offshore / nearshore <strong>the</strong>ir software or <strong>IT</strong> services.The emphasis is also on quality <strong>and</strong> security of <strong>the</strong> projects.In Table 8.1 it can be seen that <strong>the</strong> countries <strong>in</strong> Asia are <strong>in</strong> fact <strong>the</strong> least expensive outsourcedest<strong>in</strong>ations. Popular dest<strong>in</strong>ations like India <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>es are still among <strong>the</strong> leastexpensive outsourc<strong>in</strong>g countries. However, as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> those dest<strong>in</strong>ations mature, labourcosts will also rise. But, as stated before, <strong>the</strong>se countries will not be priced out of <strong>the</strong> market.Although <strong>the</strong> countries <strong>in</strong> Eastern <strong>and</strong> Central Europe are more expensive, <strong>the</strong>y still offer a lot ofcost-sav<strong>in</strong>g opportunities. O<strong>the</strong>r advantages that companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se countries have are <strong>the</strong>language abilities <strong>and</strong> cultural compatibilities that are often better than <strong>in</strong> countries <strong>in</strong> Asia. Withone or two exceptions, growth figures for 2005 until 2010 are below 8% <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore on amoderate level.Table 9.1 <strong>IT</strong> Salary levels <strong>in</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g countries, 2005AveragesalaryEntryLevelTeamLeaderProjectManagerGrowthPercentage’05-‘10*Vietnam 6,131 3,440 5,782 9,171 7.3%India 9,896 5,715 9,374 14,597 8.7%Ch<strong>in</strong>a 10,095 5,678 9,609 14,997 7.2%Thail<strong>and</strong> 11,340 5,951 10,632 17,438 3.9%Philipp<strong>in</strong>es 12,522 7,277 11,887 18,402 6.8%Romania 15,743 9,085 14,606 23,536 4.8%Brazil 15,935 9,410 15,068 23,326 5.4%Slovakia 17,395 9,285 15,050 27,850 4.2%Russia 21,018 12,131 19,690 31,235 7.2%Costa Rica 21,083 11,794 19,995 31,460 7.2%Malaysia 21,823 12,953 20,712 31,803 4.4%Mexico 22,484 13,176 21,029 33,246 4.8%Czech 22,500 12,010 19,500 36,096 6.5%RepublicHungary 25,174 14,606 23,322 37,595 5.8%Pol<strong>and</strong> 29,393 16,536 27,567 44,076 5.3%South Africa 39,696 20,357 34,694 55,036 4.0%S<strong>in</strong>gapore 41,512 24,003 38,873 61,660 3.3%Canada 43,841 25,845 41,894 63,785 3.9%Irel<strong>and</strong> 57,072 32,130 53,002 86,085 3.2%Israel 39,880 23,038 38,294 58,307 3.1%US 79,107 46,194 75,166 115,962 3.6%*forecastSource: Neolit (2006)43


44Marg<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> trade channelsTo give an <strong>in</strong>dication of how prices are built up <strong>and</strong> to give an <strong>in</strong>dication of <strong>the</strong> use of marg<strong>in</strong>swith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> most important trade channels, <strong>the</strong>se will be discussed below.Partnership with an EU companyThe <strong>in</strong>vestment needed here is not very high. The partner’s network <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU can be used tof<strong>in</strong>d customers <strong>and</strong> to get acqua<strong>in</strong>ted with <strong>the</strong> EU market. This is a real advantage over <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rentry strategies. However <strong>the</strong> problem with a partnership is <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> right partner <strong>and</strong> if apartner has been found to make sure that <strong>the</strong> price that is paid for your services is fair.IntermediariesGenerally speak<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> contracts that brokers <strong>and</strong> especially consultants negotiate could havetight pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> somewhat lower marg<strong>in</strong>s than <strong>the</strong> current <strong>in</strong>dustry levels. Thesebrokers/consultants have a clear underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> detailed cost structure of <strong>the</strong> provider <strong>and</strong>,moreover, have relationships with several service providers. As a result, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>in</strong> a position tonegotiate <strong>the</strong> best deal for <strong>the</strong> client <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU. In most cases, service providers are asked towork out <strong>the</strong>ir breakeven costs (even exclud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sales <strong>and</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g overheads), <strong>and</strong> offer a20-25% mark-up on <strong>the</strong>se costs, mean<strong>in</strong>g a net marg<strong>in</strong> of 17-20% on sales. The number ofcontracts be<strong>in</strong>g negotiated through such brokers is exp<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g.Some practical examples: <strong>in</strong> general, consultant Neo<strong>IT</strong> (http://www.neoit.com) is known as priceaggressive <strong>and</strong> will negotiate <strong>the</strong> lowest possible price for its clients. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>,consultants such as McK<strong>in</strong>sey (http://www.mck<strong>in</strong>sey.com) <strong>and</strong> Gartner (http://www.gartner.com)are more likely to emphasise <strong>the</strong> qualitative aspects of <strong>the</strong> service providers.Brokers/consultants often recommend clients to adopt a multi-vendor strategy to have at leastone lead<strong>in</strong>g customer <strong>and</strong> one mid-size vendor, <strong>in</strong> order to put pressure on <strong>the</strong> prices of bothservice providers.Local sales officeIn general, marg<strong>in</strong>s will be higher when a middle man is not needed. But, once aga<strong>in</strong>, price isnot <strong>the</strong> only issue to consider, as credibility <strong>and</strong> trust play an important role as well. The firststart-up of your own sales office is a very large <strong>in</strong>vestment that cannot be made by <strong>the</strong> majorityof <strong>the</strong> SMEs <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e.Adaptive Sourc<strong>in</strong>gForrester (2006) proposes a new outsourc<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess model — Adaptive Sourc<strong>in</strong>g. It conta<strong>in</strong>sflexible contracts, pric<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> service delivery that adapts over time to customer needs <strong>and</strong>expectations.10 Conclusions on <strong>the</strong> EU Market Opportunities for Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian SMEThere are many Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services companies posed to play a role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global<strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian outsourc<strong>in</strong>g providers have <strong>the</strong> ability to compete significantly on a costbasis, which is considerably lower than <strong>in</strong> more developed countries, <strong>and</strong> also <strong>in</strong> its Eastern<strong>European</strong> neighbours. Therefore nearshore/offshore clients can expect up to 50-60% costsav<strong>in</strong>g.In <strong>the</strong> past, most nearshore/offshore work performed by Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian providers has beensoftware development <strong>and</strong> web design. With market maturation <strong>in</strong> recent years, <strong>the</strong>se providers44


45are now compet<strong>in</strong>g for more sophisticated project <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g software eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, applicationeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, ERP systems <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> consult<strong>in</strong>g. Experts described Ukra<strong>in</strong>e is need<strong>in</strong>g to “go forbroke” due to <strong>the</strong> high economic barriers to entry <strong>and</strong> several already established <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustryplayers, although it has higher perceived geopolitical risks <strong>and</strong> major (often foreign)<strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> parts of <strong>the</strong> country 11 .Market opportunities - <strong>the</strong> most promis<strong>in</strong>g servicesTrend analysis to identify market threats <strong>and</strong> opportunitiesThe number of different services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services market is verylarge. With<strong>in</strong> one service, every contract is different <strong>and</strong> company specific. Beside<strong>the</strong> large range of services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services market, <strong>the</strong> market is alsovery dynamic. This causes trends, conditions <strong>and</strong> requirements for software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong>services to change very quickly. As a result, opportunities <strong>and</strong> threats <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> marketoften change. Therefore it is important for <strong>the</strong> exporter to cont<strong>in</strong>uously analyse <strong>the</strong>market <strong>and</strong> country that <strong>the</strong> company is active <strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> order to be able to react to <strong>the</strong>changes <strong>in</strong> that market.A trend may be an opportunity for one company but at <strong>the</strong> same time represents athreat to ano<strong>the</strong>r company. A good example of this can be given by analys<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>current trend towards better quality, added value <strong>and</strong> expertise. SMEs that can offer<strong>the</strong>se high quality services have good opportunities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU, while SMEs that onlyrely on offer<strong>in</strong>g services aga<strong>in</strong>st low costs, without look<strong>in</strong>g at quality requirements,will face <strong>the</strong> threat of be<strong>in</strong>g left out.Every opportunity becomes a threat if <strong>the</strong> company is not able to respond to thistrend <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> company is los<strong>in</strong>g terra<strong>in</strong> to o<strong>the</strong>rs that can respond to <strong>the</strong> trendsuccessfully. By do<strong>in</strong>g thorough <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous market research <strong>the</strong> company willbe able to discover <strong>the</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> country or market.Based on analysis of current trends <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU market as well as analysis of export potential ofUkra<strong>in</strong>ian software <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services <strong>in</strong>dustry we can conclude that <strong>the</strong> best opportunity forUkra<strong>in</strong>ian SMEs that want to establish commercial relationship with <strong>the</strong> EU companies isnearshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g.<strong>Software</strong> application neashore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g has a high potential, <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong> relation todevelopment projects with a small need for end-user <strong>in</strong>teraction. However it is very sensitive toIIP <strong>and</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian legislation <strong>in</strong> this area is not regarded as strong enough. <strong>Software</strong> applicationoutsourc<strong>in</strong>g is expected to be one of <strong>the</strong> quickest grow<strong>in</strong>g categories of <strong>IT</strong> services. In particularERP, BMP, collaborative applications, SCM <strong>and</strong> CRM may provide good opportunities for <strong>the</strong>SMEs <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e.Although <strong>the</strong> potential for neashor<strong>in</strong>g of system software services is high, however for Ukra<strong>in</strong>iancompanies, as well as for companies from o<strong>the</strong>r outsourc<strong>in</strong>g locations, it may be difficult to be11Vichniakova A.; (2005) Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Opportunities <strong>in</strong> Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe, Presentation toGlassmeyer/McNamee Center for Digital Strategies, April 20 th , Darmouth University, USA;Dr. D’Cruz B.; (2007), Offshore <strong>IT</strong> Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Transition Economies: A Critical Comparison of Pol<strong>and</strong>, Hungary<strong>and</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, 5 th International Critical Management Studies Conference, July 11-13.45


46able to provide <strong>the</strong>se services. The ma<strong>in</strong> problem is <strong>the</strong> need for doma<strong>in</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> mostsystems still come from <strong>the</strong> USA. System software security, <strong>IT</strong> simplification <strong>and</strong> optimization,data protection <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>telligence tools can provide opportunities for Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian SMEs thatwant to be active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU market for <strong>the</strong>se services.With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> best chances are for professional <strong>IT</strong> services, <strong>in</strong> particularimplementation services, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g configuration, development, test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> management.The most promis<strong>in</strong>g EU partnersEU companies prefer nearshor<strong>in</strong>g due to cultural <strong>and</strong> geographical advantages <strong>and</strong> a greatersense of control which is very important for <strong>the</strong>m. Many large companies already nearhore.Dem<strong>and</strong> is <strong>the</strong> largest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nordic countries.Nearshor<strong>in</strong>g is becom<strong>in</strong>g an area of grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest also for small <strong>and</strong> medium companies fromsuch countries like Sweden, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s, Denmark <strong>and</strong> Germany.It is expected that with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> software application outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> major part of spend<strong>in</strong>g will bemade by f<strong>in</strong>ancial service companies <strong>in</strong> UK, Sc<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>avian countries <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s.Ukra<strong>in</strong>e may become for <strong>the</strong> German <strong>and</strong> Swiss <strong>IT</strong> services sector an <strong>in</strong>tegrated part of <strong>the</strong>ircross-boarder value cha<strong>in</strong>. These delivery models comb<strong>in</strong>e nearshore <strong>and</strong> onshore servicecomponents <strong>and</strong> go along with a high organizational maturity level.Ma<strong>in</strong> areas of focus to improve competitive positionAccord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> global rank<strong>in</strong>g by AT Kearney (2007), Ukra<strong>in</strong>e occupies <strong>the</strong> 47 th place on <strong>the</strong>list of top 50 <strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g locations. In terms of three major categories that reflect importantdrivers for near/offshore decisions, Ukra<strong>in</strong>e is ranged as follows:• Cost (f<strong>in</strong>ancial attractiveness) – <strong>the</strong> 27 th , but <strong>the</strong> 4 th <strong>in</strong> Europe (after Bulgaria, Slovakia <strong>and</strong>Romania);• People <strong>and</strong> skills availability – <strong>the</strong> 34 th (<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> 12 th <strong>in</strong> Europe);• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment – <strong>the</strong> 48 th (only Indonesia <strong>and</strong> Senegal fare worse).It should be underl<strong>in</strong>ed, that Ukra<strong>in</strong>e belongs to ten countries that were added to <strong>the</strong> AT KearneyIndex <strong>in</strong> 2007, which reflects <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g number of countries compet<strong>in</strong>g to become viableremote services locations, <strong>and</strong> companies’ <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g near/offshore locations outside <strong>the</strong>established locations. The Index highlights <strong>the</strong> major strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e’ asan outsourc<strong>in</strong>g dest<strong>in</strong>ation.To occupy <strong>the</strong> market niches <strong>and</strong> successfully compete on <strong>the</strong> EU market <strong>the</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian <strong>IT</strong>companies need to improve <strong>the</strong>ir weaknesses (see annex III to this survey). The follow<strong>in</strong>g majorrecommendations have been formulated based on <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry surveys:• For <strong>IT</strong> companies <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> area of concentration should be on develop<strong>in</strong>gbus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> project management skills. No doubt Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian companies have <strong>the</strong> requiredtechnical expertise, but lack of underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of appropriate bus<strong>in</strong>ess culture. Successfulnear/offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g depends on achiev<strong>in</strong>g expected objectives, hence supplier-clientrelationships become imperative for operational effectiveness.• For firms <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong> services outsourc<strong>in</strong>g CMM/ISO certification is important. The highestlevels of relevant certification from recognized <strong>in</strong>ternational certification bodies is necessaryto successfully compete with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global market.46


47• The Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian government needs to establish a coherent support strategy for <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>IT</strong><strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>and</strong> have more responsibility for its technology policy. In particular it would benefit<strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry if <strong>the</strong> government paid more attention to <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>IT</strong> governance <strong>and</strong>account<strong>in</strong>g st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>in</strong> order to establish more transparent f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>and</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g systems,as well as legal forms for ensur<strong>in</strong>g strong IPP. The government needs to put more effort <strong>in</strong>todevelop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> awareness of its <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>and</strong> companies as credible outsourc<strong>in</strong>g suppliers<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global world. Market<strong>in</strong>g campaigns, exhibitions <strong>and</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g conferencesorganized by government agencies will draw attention to <strong>the</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global arena<strong>and</strong> potentially br<strong>in</strong>g new customers.47


48Annex I Useful Sources of Information on <strong>the</strong> EU market for <strong>IT</strong> software <strong>and</strong>servicesMarket <strong>and</strong> trends• EURO<strong>IT</strong>X – http://www.<strong>eu</strong>roitx.com ‘market <strong>and</strong> trends’ for more <strong>in</strong>formation)• <strong>European</strong> Information & Communications Technology Industry Association (EICTA) -http://www.eicta.org• <strong>European</strong> Information Technology Observatory (E<strong>IT</strong>O) – http://www.eito.comSupply <strong>and</strong> trends• Ebus<strong>in</strong>esswatch –http://www.ebus<strong>in</strong>ess- watch.org/resources/ict_itservices/SR10a_<strong>IT</strong>S_2005_web.pdf• E-commerce <strong>and</strong> Development Report 2003, Unctad: open source software: Implications forICT policy <strong>and</strong> development –http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/ecdr2003ch4_en.pdf• <strong>European</strong> Information & Communications Technology Industry Association (EICTA) -http://www.eicta.org• <strong>European</strong> <strong>Software</strong> Association - http://www.<strong>eu</strong>ropeansoftware.org• MIMOS Open Source - http://opensource.mimos.my• Open source <strong>in</strong>itiative - http://www.opensource.org• Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g center - http://www.outsourc<strong>in</strong>g-center.comThe EU Offshore / Nearshore Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Market• CIO magaz<strong>in</strong>e - http://www.cio.com/topic/1521/Offshor<strong>in</strong>g - offers an aggregation of articlesfocused on offshor<strong>in</strong>g.• EURO<strong>IT</strong>X – http://www.<strong>eu</strong>roitx.com - EURO<strong>IT</strong>X offers a section for technology specificallywith useful sources <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation.• Forrester – http://www.forrester.com - mostly paid reports, but <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>summary that is freely available.• Gartner – http://www.gartner.com - both paid <strong>and</strong> free reports on <strong>in</strong>formation technology• Neo<strong>IT</strong> – http://www.neoit.com - go to “knowledge <strong>and</strong> research” to view <strong>the</strong> free “whitepapers”.• Offshore Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Best Practices - http://www.oobp.org/default.aspx• Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g center - http://www.outsourc<strong>in</strong>g-center.com• Ventoro – http://www.ventoro.com/Offshore2005ResearchF<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.pdfOffshore / Neashore Locations• AT Kearney - http://www.atkearney.com• CIO magaz<strong>in</strong>e - http://www.cio.com/archive/071506/2006_global_outsourc<strong>in</strong>g_guide.pdf• EIU - http://graphics.eiu.com/files/ad_pdfs/eiuOffshor<strong>in</strong>gWP.pdf• Neo<strong>IT</strong> – http://www.neoit.comCh<strong>in</strong>a• Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>Software</strong> Industry Association (CSIA) – http://www.csia.org.cn• Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s software <strong>in</strong>dustry – http://zl<strong>in</strong>.ba.ttu.edu/papers/Outgo<strong>in</strong>g/G<strong>IT</strong>M-<strong>IT</strong>C-3.pdf - currentstatus <strong>and</strong> development (PDF file).Czech Republic• Asociace pro poradenství v podnikání - http://www.asocpor.cz48


49Hungary• Hungarian <strong>Software</strong> Alliance (HSA) - http://www.h-s-a.huIndia• NASSCOM – http://www.nasscom.org• Outsource2<strong>in</strong>dia - http://www.outsource2<strong>in</strong>dia.comPhilipp<strong>in</strong>es• <strong>European</strong> I.T. Service Center (E<strong>IT</strong>SC) – http://www.eitsc.com• Foundation for Information Technology Education <strong>and</strong> Development (F<strong>IT</strong>-ED) -http://www.fit-ed.org• Outsourcephillip<strong>in</strong>es - http://www.outsourcephilipp<strong>in</strong>es.orgPol<strong>and</strong>• American Chamber of Commerce <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong> - http://www.amcham.com.pl• Polish Chamber of Information Technology <strong>and</strong> Telecommunications - http://www.piit.org.plRussia• Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g-Russia - http://www.outsourc<strong>in</strong>g-russia.com - Select ‘database of RussianOffshore <strong>Software</strong> Development companies’ for an overview of companies.Distribution Channels• <strong>European</strong> Information & Communications Technology Industry Association (EICTA) -http://www.eicta.org• Offshore Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Best Practices - http://www.oobp.org/default.aspx• Ventoro – http://www.ventoro.com/Offshore2005ResearchF<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.pdf49


50Annex II A.T.Kearney Global <strong>Services</strong> Location Index MetrixCategory Sub-category MetricsF<strong>in</strong>ancialattractiveness(40%)Compensation costs• Average wages• Median compensation costs for relevantpositions (call-center representatives, BPOanalysts, <strong>IT</strong> programmers <strong>and</strong> local operationsmanagers)Infrastructure costs• Rental costs• Commercial electricity rates• International telecom costs• Travel to major customer dest<strong>in</strong>ationsTax <strong>and</strong> regulatorycosts• Relative tax burden• Corruption perception• Currency appreciation or depreciationPeople <strong>and</strong>skillsavailability(30%)Remote servicessectorexperience <strong>and</strong>qualityrat<strong>in</strong>gs• Size of exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>IT</strong> <strong>and</strong> BPO sectors• Contact center <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> center qualitycertifications• Quality rat<strong>in</strong>gs of management schools <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong>tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gLabor forceavailability• Total work force• University-educated work force• Work force flexibilityEducation <strong>and</strong>language• Scores on st<strong>and</strong>ardized education <strong>and</strong>language testsAttrition risk • Relative <strong>IT</strong> <strong>and</strong> BPO sector growth <strong>and</strong>unemployment ratesBus<strong>in</strong>essenvironment(30%)Country environment • Investor <strong>and</strong> analyst rat<strong>in</strong>gs of overall bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>and</strong> political environment• A.T. Kearney Foreign Direct InvestmentConfidence IndexTM• Security risk• Regulatory burden <strong>and</strong> employment rigidity• Government support for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong>communications technology (ICT) sectorInfrastructure• Overall <strong>in</strong>frastructure quality• Quality of telecom, Internet, <strong>and</strong> electricity<strong>in</strong>frastructureCultural exposure • Personal <strong>in</strong>teraction score from A.T. KearneyGlobalization IndexTMSecurity of<strong>in</strong>tellectualproperty (IP)• Investor rat<strong>in</strong>gs of IP protection <strong>and</strong> ICT laws• <strong>Software</strong> piracy rates• Information security certificationsSource: A.T. Kearney50


51Annex III Evaluation of <strong>IT</strong> Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Potential of Ukra<strong>in</strong>eFactor Evaluation results: positive (+) negative (-)Related to Country InfrastructurePoliticaleconomicstability<strong>and</strong>Government <strong>and</strong>associatedsupportLegal <strong>and</strong>regulatoryenvironmentCommunications<strong>in</strong>frastructure(+) Country focuses on foster<strong>in</strong>g closer <strong>in</strong>tegration with <strong>the</strong> rest of<strong>the</strong> world.(- +) Although Ukra<strong>in</strong>e is considered by some to be more stablecountry than India or Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> geopolitical <strong>and</strong> economic terms,<strong>the</strong>re are still some political uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties (e.g. <strong>the</strong> country’sstability has been constra<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest of large Ukra<strong>in</strong>ianf<strong>in</strong>ancial groups <strong>and</strong> several parliamentary divisions).(-+)The Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian near/offshore <strong>in</strong>dustry has relatively recentlybeen regarded as a priority sector by <strong>the</strong> government.(-) No evidence of practical governmental <strong>in</strong>itiatives to supportnear/offshore <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e; officially <strong>the</strong> governmentsupports “<strong>in</strong>formatization”, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g software export development,however <strong>in</strong> practice <strong>IT</strong> providers <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e have to rely purely on<strong>the</strong>ir own capabilities <strong>and</strong> resources.(+) A few organizations have been established to support softwarefirms <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e (Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian Association of <strong>Software</strong> developers,Association <strong>IT</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>IT</strong> Committee of <strong>the</strong> American Chamber ofCommerce).(+) portal by trans-national support organisation OffshoreOutsourc<strong>in</strong>g Best Practice (OOBP).(-) Ukra<strong>in</strong>e has unfavourable legal <strong>and</strong> regulatory environment, <strong>in</strong>particular <strong>in</strong> such areas as taxation, visa regulations <strong>and</strong>import/export regulations.(-) Ukra<strong>in</strong>e is not adequately prepared <strong>in</strong> this area due to lack ofnational <strong>in</strong>vestment. The communications <strong>in</strong>frastructure isadequate <strong>in</strong> terms of b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>and</strong> connectivity, but not wellprepared for near/offshore outsourc<strong>in</strong>g; majority of firms are wellequipped with essential communications technologies (faxfacilities, multil<strong>in</strong>gual web sites, groupware platforms are quitecommon tools), never<strong>the</strong>less Ukra<strong>in</strong>e’s telecommunications<strong>in</strong>frastructure does not allow most of <strong>the</strong> software providers tohave advanced facilities such as video-conferenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> satelliteconnections.Related to Human Expertise <strong>and</strong> ResourcesQuality<strong>in</strong>itiativesAvailability ofskilled labourresources(- +) Majority of Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian firms concentrate <strong>the</strong>ir efforts on twomajor types of certification: ISO <strong>and</strong> SEI/CMM, however only ¼software development companies has obta<strong>in</strong>ed any form of qualitycertification (mostly due to f<strong>in</strong>ancial difficulties <strong>and</strong> lack ofcertification bodies with<strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e).(+) UASWD has already undertaken <strong>the</strong> first steps towardsbecom<strong>in</strong>g a formal CMM certification centre <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e.(+) The Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian labour force has traditionally significant softwaredevelopment skills. The UASWD estimated <strong>in</strong> 2000 that <strong>the</strong>re were40,000-60,000 people <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong> potentially able to be engaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>IT</strong>development activities. A high level of up-today technical skills <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> labour force was reported by an America Chamber ofCommerce survey (2003). Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian companies also have a strongresearch <strong>and</strong> development tradition. Both <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>and</strong> local51


52Labour costEducationalsystemForeignlanguageproficiencyMarket<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r bus<strong>in</strong>essskillsRelated to cultural issuesCulturalcompatibilityrecruit<strong>in</strong>g agencies operate on <strong>the</strong> domestic HR-market, so that<strong>the</strong> hir<strong>in</strong>g process is ra<strong>the</strong>r efficient for companies wish<strong>in</strong>g to avail<strong>the</strong>mselves of <strong>IT</strong>-resources throughout Ukra<strong>in</strong>e.(+) More str<strong>in</strong>gent visa <strong>and</strong> work permit regulations seem to be <strong>the</strong>major <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g factor <strong>in</strong> terms of prevent<strong>in</strong>g Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian workersleav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> country, which suggests that <strong>the</strong> potential fordevelop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g an <strong>IT</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry through <strong>the</strong>offshore model <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e could be potentially susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>longer term, assum<strong>in</strong>g economic <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r necessary conditionsimprove.(+) Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian software developers’ wages are still significantlylowered than those <strong>in</strong> more developed countries.(+) Ukra<strong>in</strong>e has an advantage over competitor countries due to awell established educational system. The Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian educationsystem <strong>in</strong>herited from <strong>the</strong> Soviet <strong>Union</strong> had recognized strengths<strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> technical discipl<strong>in</strong>es. Many software developers<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country have an applied ma<strong>the</strong>matics <strong>and</strong> physicsbackground, which has traditionally been as beneficial to <strong>the</strong>growth of <strong>the</strong> comput<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. Although <strong>the</strong> skills of recent <strong>IT</strong>graduates are not always up-to-date due to rapid technologychanges, but still satisfactory to <strong>the</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian software companies.The educational system is also well supported by mult<strong>in</strong>ationalcompanies like: Motorola, HP <strong>and</strong> Dell which have providedequipment <strong>and</strong> support for some of Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian educational<strong>in</strong>stitutions.(+) Higher education <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e provides foreign language coursesfor students study<strong>in</strong>g computer discipl<strong>in</strong>es, so that softwaredevelopers can obta<strong>in</strong> adequate language skills. The percentageof <strong>the</strong> foreign language-speak<strong>in</strong>g workforce varies considerablybetween companies <strong>and</strong> largely depend on <strong>the</strong> provider’s marketorientation. However, on average, more than 50% of a firm’sworkforce has foreign language proficiency <strong>and</strong> English ispredom<strong>in</strong>ant foreign language.(-) Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian companies only started to employ western practicefollow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependence, so this area is still develop<strong>in</strong>g. Only <strong>the</strong>bigger, well-established software providers have <strong>the</strong> resources toemploy experienced expatriates, MBA graduates, or o<strong>the</strong>rspecialists from abroad who are familiar with global bus<strong>in</strong>esspractices – this is necessary to deal with <strong>in</strong>ternational companies.(+ - ) Geographically <strong>and</strong> historically, Western Ukra<strong>in</strong>e is EasternEurope <strong>and</strong> is keen to forge closer l<strong>in</strong>ks with Western Europe.O<strong>the</strong>r parts of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e are more allied to Russia, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>deed moreoften Russian speak<strong>in</strong>g with a very different “cultural fit”. Theoverall perception is that <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> look of Ukra<strong>in</strong>ians <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>desire to embrace western practices are positive factors, althoughthis has to be set with<strong>in</strong> a political <strong>and</strong> cultural context.Source: adapted from Dr. D’Cruz B.; (2007), Offshore <strong>IT</strong> Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Transition Economies: ACritical Comparison of Pol<strong>and</strong>, Hungary <strong>and</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, 5 th International Critical Management StudiesConference, July 11-1352


53Annex IV References• Central & Eastern Europe <strong>IT</strong> Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Review ‘2007, Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian HI-TECH Initiative, 2007• From Survey to Success. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Export<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Software</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>Services</strong> to <strong>the</strong> EU, CBI,December 2007;• Mapp<strong>in</strong>g Offshore Markets Update 2005, neo<strong>IT</strong>, 2005• Offshore <strong>IT</strong> Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Transition Economies: A Critical Comparison of Pol<strong>and</strong>,Hungary <strong>and</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, Dr. D’Cruz B.; 5 th International Critical Management StudiesConference, July 11-13, 2007;• Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Opportunities <strong>in</strong> Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe, Vichniakova A.; Presentation toGlassmeyer/McNamee Center for Digital Strategies, 20 April 2005, Darmouth University,USA;• The potential of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Global <strong>IT</strong> Offshore Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Market, NorthamptonBus<strong>in</strong>ess School, December 2002;• The <strong>Software</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>IT</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Market for Offshore <strong>and</strong> Nearshore Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU,CBI, December 2007;• What is your Sourc<strong>in</strong>g Strategy?, Busher, J.; The Outsorc<strong>in</strong>g Project, Vol. 1, 11 March2002;• The White Paper on Offshore Development <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, The <strong>IT</strong> Committee of <strong>the</strong> AmericanChamber of Commerce <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, 2002• Information on websites <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Annex I53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!