Incubators host on average 11 <strong>SME</strong>, which is lower than <strong>the</strong> EU BIC average <strong>of</strong> 34enterprises hosted. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>SME</strong>s hosted belong to <strong>the</strong> service <strong>and</strong> industry sector, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re isnot a clear sector targeting <strong>of</strong> potential tenants.All incubators provide business consulting services, such as advise for company set up<strong>and</strong> business planning, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y contribute thus to enlarge <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> advisory services. Threeincubators do not provide <strong>of</strong>fice space 5, although <strong>the</strong>y have conference <strong>and</strong> training facilities<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>and</strong> secretarial services. Ten incubators provide ICT services, <strong>and</strong> only twoincubators have laboratory facilities. These figures will probably change as soon as moretechnology-specific incubators are established to promote innovative enterprises working inhigh value added sectors.A second survey was carried out by ANIMMC to analyze <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> businessincubator. The survey’s findings show that only 16% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incubators’ managers haveattended a specific training course. Incubators’ managers think that <strong>the</strong>ir success relies onrenting appropriate <strong>and</strong> well-equipped <strong>of</strong>fice space, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y do not consider <strong>the</strong> supply <strong>of</strong>advisory services as <strong>the</strong>ir core business.Incubators’ managers declared that <strong>the</strong>ir priorities for <strong>the</strong> next future focus on betterpromoting <strong>the</strong>ir image among potential clients, <strong>and</strong> on diversifying <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> services <strong>of</strong>fered.They also expect to receive more support from public authorities, since <strong>the</strong>y deem <strong>the</strong>re ismuch scope for improvement. Interviewed persons see Romania’s accession to EU as a catalystfor new investments in <strong>the</strong> <strong>SME</strong> sector, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y also think that this will lead to a morecompetitive business environment.According to <strong>the</strong> OECD recommendations, “2004 Enterprise Policy PerformanceAssessment Romania” <strong>and</strong> to <strong>the</strong> Governmental Strategy for developing <strong>the</strong> <strong>SME</strong>, <strong>and</strong>, basedon <strong>the</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> “Study regarding <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>of</strong> Business Incubators in Romania”, NA<strong>SME</strong>Cmade important progresses in elaborating <strong>the</strong> “Strategy for developing <strong>the</strong> incubators networkin Romania”. This strategy aims at making more dynamic <strong>the</strong> business environment <strong>and</strong>supporting start-ups through specific financial instruments directed to local level, <strong>and</strong>supported stained by local <strong>and</strong> governmental authorities. The strategic objectives are:• Collaboration in Innovation <strong>and</strong> technology with research centers <strong>and</strong> universities, tolaunch innovative products <strong>and</strong> services;50
• Regional development, promoting balanced development by channeling resources todisadvantaged regions <strong>and</strong> weak sectors;• Supply chain development, <strong>of</strong>fering specialized components <strong>and</strong> creating spin-<strong>of</strong>fs,through linkages with key manufactures, facilitating <strong>the</strong> downsizing <strong>of</strong> big industrialfirms;• Internationalization, supporting foreign companies willing to enter <strong>the</strong> local market inpartnership with local businesses, or using <strong>the</strong> BI as a basis for exporting to thirdmarkets;• Specialized development addressing specific industrial sectors.Industrial <strong>and</strong> technology parks are relatively new concept in Romania. TheGovernmental Decision 65 as <strong>of</strong> 30 August 2001 sets <strong>the</strong> administrative framework for <strong>the</strong>establishment <strong>and</strong> functioning <strong>of</strong> industrial parks, while <strong>the</strong> Governmental Decision 14 as <strong>of</strong> 24January 2002 rules <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> industrial <strong>and</strong> technology parks. The decision statesthat industrial park infrastructure can be created as independent business <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y can receivefinancial support ei<strong>the</strong>r from local public administrations or from Governmental authorities.Responsibility for choosing <strong>the</strong> most suitable location, establishing <strong>and</strong> developing <strong>the</strong> industrialpark is with <strong>the</strong> company that is administering <strong>the</strong> park. Tax rate deductions are applicable to<strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it, in order to promote <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> new infrastructures or to exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>existing ones.By supporting <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> this infrastructure <strong>the</strong> government aims at:ˆ Creating new job opportunities,ˆ Attracting more free direct investment,ˆ Creating knowledge based society.The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Administration <strong>and</strong> Internal Affairs <strong>of</strong>ficially registered 30 industrialparks, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> full list is enclosed to this publication as an Annex E. Few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m areoperational, <strong>and</strong> most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m are working well below <strong>the</strong>ir capacity. The functioning parkshoused on average 18 companies within <strong>the</strong>ir premises, out <strong>of</strong> which 98% are <strong>SME</strong>s. Most <strong>of</strong>companies located in industrial parks belong to <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector, while firms in service<strong>and</strong> trade sector take a smaller share.All industrial parks provide modular <strong>and</strong> functional space, <strong>and</strong> most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m providesecurity, cleaning, meeting room <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice services. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m also provide businessadvisory services. It is remarkable that only two parks have technically equipped laboratoriesthat are usually available in technology parks.The geographical distribution <strong>of</strong> industrial parks follows an inverse pattern than thoseobserved for business incubators. Indeed, industrial parks, being mainly driven by privatesector investment, tend to locate in wealthier area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country close to big industrial hubwhere foreign direct investments also prosper.The Government is continuously promoting <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> Industrial parks. Its decision(GD) No. 406/2003 is concerning <strong>the</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> specific methodological rule about constitute,function, methods <strong>of</strong> evaluation <strong>and</strong> accredit entities from innovation infrastructure <strong>and</strong>technological transfer, also about <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> sustaining <strong>the</strong>m. The GD No. 128/2004 isconcerning <strong>the</strong> approval <strong>of</strong> National Plan “The <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> innovation infrastructure <strong>and</strong>technological transfer – INFRATECH”. In 2004. was adopted GD no. 1232/2004 for approval <strong>the</strong>Protocol between NA<strong>SME</strong>C Romania <strong>and</strong> United Nation Program regarding National multiannualprogram for setting up <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> technological <strong>and</strong> business incubatorsduring 2002 – 2005. The procedure <strong>of</strong> implementing <strong>the</strong> program was approved by <strong>the</strong>President Order <strong>of</strong> NAMSEC (PONAMSEC) no. 215/2004 <strong>and</strong> completed with PONAMSEC nr.197/2005. In 27. July 2005. <strong>the</strong> program was <strong>of</strong>ficial roll on by <strong>the</strong> State Minister forcoordinating <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> business environment <strong>and</strong> <strong>SME</strong>s, NAMSEC, UN <strong>Development</strong>51
- Page 4 and 5: 1. SME DECLARATION AND WORKING GROU
- Page 6 and 7: While comparing the BSEC and EU doc
- Page 8 and 9: cooperation with the United Nations
- Page 10 and 11: GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF THE BSEC WG O
- Page 12 and 13: “Armenia's new law introduces a n
- Page 14 and 15: (iii)Share of the labor force of SM
- Page 16 and 17: The following data represents some
- Page 18 and 19: RankDocuments for export(number)Tra
- Page 20 and 21: • Industrial zones/Business incub
- Page 22 and 23: 3.1.4. FINANCING SMEsProf. Dr. Sela
- Page 24 and 25: • the loan is secured with movabl
- Page 26 and 27: 3.1.4.3. Mutual and loan guarantee
- Page 28 and 29: introduction of e-signatures, only
- Page 30 and 31: The Code of Conduct for Civil Serva
- Page 32 and 33: Trading Across Borders Enforcing Co
- Page 34 and 35: as with all non-governmental organi
- Page 36 and 37: Bulgarian SMEs obtain additional ca
- Page 38 and 39: • Project BG 2004/016-711.11.04 -
- Page 40 and 41: usiness is not approaching them oft
- Page 42 and 43: • Romanian citizens are recognize
- Page 44 and 45: The preparatory project of the NDP
- Page 46 and 47: • To support participation in eco
- Page 48 and 49: In 2004, the National Institute of
- Page 52 and 53: Programs. The program is implemente
- Page 54 and 55: development instrument is extremely
- Page 56 and 57: accounting standards, including med
- Page 58 and 59: corporations and open held corporat
- Page 60 and 61: promoting SME sector, cooperation w
- Page 62 and 63: • for unemployed (micro credit)
- Page 64 and 65: are private pension funds, broker h
- Page 66 and 67: very early steps of its democratic
- Page 68 and 69: Another negative factor that is mor
- Page 70 and 71: economy. The so called in the organ
- Page 72 and 73: Federal funds, private capital, esp
- Page 74 and 75: 4.3. MOLDOVATable 14.Dimensions Neg
- Page 76 and 77: Related andsupportingindustriesDome
- Page 78 and 79: Technological:Internetaccessibility
- Page 80 and 81: Domesticdemand• Still not many pe
- Page 82 and 83: international investments• Govern
- Page 84 and 85: 3. Hamel, G., Prahalad, C.K. (1994)
- Page 86 and 87: 5.2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE SME SECTOR I
- Page 88 and 89: General Characteristic of SME Devel
- Page 90 and 91: Index of SME Development in Armenia
- Page 92 and 93: The same problem exists in getting
- Page 94 and 95: SME support infrastructure in Armen
- Page 96 and 97: 5 million was provided by UNDP and
- Page 98 and 99: 5.3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE SME SECTOR I
- Page 100 and 101:
Diagram 1. The number of small ente
- Page 102 and 103:
The privatization process of object
- Page 104 and 105:
13.Cabinet Provision on “Distribu
- Page 106 and 107:
5.3.3. SME support infrastructure i
- Page 108 and 109:
The role of the state in technical
- Page 110 and 111:
General situation of credit marketT
- Page 112 and 113:
After creation and starting impleme
- Page 114 and 115:
At the meantime, small enterprise s
- Page 116 and 117:
Table. 32.Ease of businessDoingBusi
- Page 118 and 119:
people who start small businesses t
- Page 120 and 121:
are salaried and the medium - sized
- Page 122 and 123:
Technology Foresight in Greece 2001
- Page 124 and 125:
Greek VC market started to develop
- Page 126 and 127:
In the area of bankruptcy and restr
- Page 128 and 129:
enterprises. According to TURKSTAT,
- Page 130 and 131:
small size enterprise or micro ente
- Page 132 and 133:
industrial enterprises. Undersecret
- Page 134 and 135:
individuals, rather than well struc
- Page 136 and 137:
7. SUGGESTIONS FOR THE SME DEVELOPM
- Page 138 and 139:
Annex 1.MAP OF THE BLACK SEA COUNTR
- Page 140 and 141:
17-18 June 2005 1 st Moscow Interna
- Page 142 and 143:
ARMENIASTRENGTHS• Application of
- Page 144 and 145:
BULGARIASTRENGHT• Flexibility and
- Page 146 and 147:
GREECESTRENGHT• They have a vital
- Page 148 and 149:
ROMANIASTRENGHTWEAKNESS• Stabilis
- Page 150 and 151:
REPUBLIC OF SERBIASTRENGHT• Longe
- Page 152 and 153:
UKRAINESTRENGTHS• Well educated l
- Page 154 and 155:
In compliance with the Resolution m
- Page 156 and 157:
1. Please provide definition of SME
- Page 158 and 159:
7. Did you establish a dedicated bo
- Page 160:
11. Do you have any suggestions for