usiness is not approaching <strong>the</strong>m <strong>of</strong>ten for solving problems in <strong>the</strong> respective sector <strong>and</strong> doesnot rely on <strong>the</strong>ir support <strong>and</strong> cooperation.In <strong>the</strong> last years, <strong>the</strong> corruption level in Bulgaria is comparable to <strong>the</strong> corruption level inCentral Europe. Despite <strong>the</strong> efforts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government, <strong>the</strong> civil society, <strong>the</strong> business <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>mass media, a large part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> society continues to believe that considerable results are notyet achieved in <strong>the</strong> anti-corruption practices. Very serious is <strong>the</strong> criticism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EuropeanUnion in that respect. In <strong>the</strong> EU monitoring report dated 26 September 2006 a conclusion hasbeen made that despite <strong>the</strong> progress made in combating corruption <strong>the</strong> latter continues to be aproblem for <strong>the</strong> country.Among <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r problems related to <strong>the</strong> business environment, <strong>the</strong> managers <strong>of</strong> <strong>SME</strong>spointed out <strong>the</strong> tax system.3.3. ROMANIA3.3.1. <strong>SME</strong> SECTOR DEVELOPMENTRomania’s transition, starting in 1990, was in many respects more difficult than in <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r countries <strong>of</strong> Central <strong>and</strong> Eastern Europe. This was partly because by <strong>the</strong> late 1980s, <strong>the</strong>country’s economy was on <strong>the</strong> verge <strong>of</strong> collapse after 40 years <strong>of</strong> rigid central planning thatemphasized self reliance, an excessive focus on heavy industry <strong>and</strong> large, uneconomicinfrastructure projects. Since 2000, <strong>the</strong> Government has implemented macroeconomic policieswhich are supportive <strong>of</strong> growth. Over <strong>the</strong> last years Romania has made significant progresstowards macro-economic stabilization; rates <strong>of</strong> economic growth achieved higher values,inflation <strong>and</strong> interest rates declined steadily, <strong>the</strong> fiscal deficit was brought under control,foreign exchange reserves increased to historic highs, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> external balance was held tocomfortable levels. Export growth remained vigorous, fuelled by private investment <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>initial competitive depreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> currency. The competitiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enterprise sectorwas boosted by productivity gains.As a result <strong>of</strong> greater political <strong>and</strong> economic stability <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong>economic reforms, <strong>the</strong> investment climate has started to improve <strong>and</strong> international investorsare looking at <strong>the</strong> region with a much more positive attitude, seeing Romania as a possibilityfor increasing <strong>the</strong>ir trade on <strong>the</strong> regional market. The Romanian Government recognized <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SME</strong> Sector as <strong>the</strong> basis for establishing <strong>and</strong> developing a modern,dynamic knowledge-based economy <strong>and</strong> supported its development through GovernmentalStrategy for Sustaining <strong>the</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> Small <strong>and</strong> Medium-sized Enterprises in 2004-2008.The priorities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Romanian Government in support <strong>of</strong> <strong>SME</strong> development in <strong>the</strong> period 2004-2008 are:Priority A: Creating a business environment supportive to <strong>SME</strong> establishment <strong>and</strong>development through:• Improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regulatory framework <strong>and</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> administrative <strong>and</strong>technical barriers• <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> institutional capacity <strong>of</strong> NA<strong>SME</strong>C• Improving <strong>the</strong> public - private dialogue with <strong>SME</strong> representative organisations <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rrelevant stake holders.Priority B: Developing <strong>SME</strong> competitiveness through:• Supporting innovation <strong>and</strong> improving <strong>the</strong> access <strong>of</strong> <strong>SME</strong>s to new technologies• Supporting <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> quality st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> quality management systems• Promoting e-business40
• Facilitating access to <strong>the</strong> available assets <strong>of</strong> state owned enterprises <strong>and</strong> to publicprocurement• Improving access to business support <strong>and</strong> information services• Supporting business incubators in <strong>the</strong> productive sector <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> higher added valueservice sector• Supporting <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> industrial parks• Decreasing regional disparities through targeted support to <strong>SME</strong>s.Priority C: Improving <strong>SME</strong> access to finance through:• Improving productive <strong>SME</strong> capitalization• Sustaining a national network <strong>of</strong> <strong>SME</strong> Guarantee Funds development• Financing <strong>SME</strong> start-ups in priority sectors• Pilot innovative instruments for financing <strong>SME</strong>s.Priority D: Improving <strong>SME</strong> access to external markets through:• Stimulating <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> cross-border cooperation <strong>and</strong> regional businesspartnerships• Improving <strong>the</strong> access <strong>of</strong> <strong>SME</strong> to external markets• Promoting an entrepreneurial culture <strong>and</strong> streng<strong>the</strong>ning management performance• Developing an entrepreneurial culture• Training <strong>and</strong> consultancy services for managers <strong>and</strong> entrepreneurs.The following data role represents some indicators <strong>of</strong> <strong>SME</strong> sector in Romanian economy,according to National Agency for Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Enterprises <strong>and</strong> Cooperation (NAMSEC),issued in Annual Report on <strong>SME</strong> sector in Romania 2005:• Number <strong>of</strong> private <strong>SME</strong>s amounts 402.996 (99.7% <strong>of</strong> total <strong>SME</strong>s): 358,242 microenterprises, 36.080 small enterprises <strong>and</strong> 8,674 medium-sized <strong>SME</strong>s.• Share <strong>of</strong> private <strong>SME</strong>s by sector <strong>of</strong> economy: agriculture 2.8%, industry 13.6%,construction 6.2%, services 77.4%.• Number <strong>of</strong> employees in private <strong>SME</strong>s amounts 2,349,725 (56.6% <strong>of</strong> total employees):733,230 in micro enterprises, 726,953 in small enterprises <strong>and</strong> 889,542 in mediumsized<strong>SME</strong>s.• Share <strong>of</strong> employees in private <strong>SME</strong>s by sector <strong>of</strong> economy: agriculture 3.3%, industry34%, construction 10.7%, services 52%.• <strong>SME</strong>s turnover (in million Euros) amounts 65,055.• Labour productivity (as turnover in Euro over employee) amounts 27,686.• Export <strong>of</strong> <strong>SME</strong>s in millions Euro amounts 6,755.• Pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> <strong>SME</strong> sector (as ratio net pr<strong>of</strong>it over turnover, in %) amounts 4.7: 8.6%for micro, 3% for small <strong>and</strong> 2.6% for medium-sized enterprises.3.3.2. LEGISLATION AND STEPS OF DOING BUSINESSLaw no 359/2004 <strong>of</strong> 13 September 2004. (simplifying <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial procedures for <strong>the</strong>registration to <strong>the</strong> Trade Registry <strong>of</strong> natural persons, family associations <strong>and</strong> legal persons,along with <strong>the</strong>ir tax registration <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> legal persons’ authorization for operation, amended<strong>and</strong> completed through GEO No. 75/2004) simplifies <strong>the</strong> registration <strong>and</strong> authorizing procedurein <strong>the</strong> following sense:• It reduces <strong>the</strong> duration for issuing <strong>the</strong> registry certificate <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> remarks certificate to3 days <strong>and</strong> 5 days.• It authorizes <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> a trading agent based on <strong>the</strong> latter’s statement tha<strong>the</strong>/she does not carry out that particular activity or that <strong>the</strong> requirements stipulated inlegislation for that activity have been met.Law no 300 <strong>of</strong> 28 June 2004 (authorizing natural persons <strong>and</strong> family associations whichcarry out independent commercial activities brings in <strong>the</strong> following:41
- Page 4 and 5: 1. SME DECLARATION AND WORKING GROU
- Page 6 and 7: While comparing the BSEC and EU doc
- Page 8 and 9: cooperation with the United Nations
- Page 10 and 11: GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF THE BSEC WG O
- Page 12 and 13: “Armenia's new law introduces a n
- Page 14 and 15: (iii)Share of the labor force of SM
- Page 16 and 17: The following data represents some
- Page 18 and 19: RankDocuments for export(number)Tra
- Page 20 and 21: • Industrial zones/Business incub
- Page 22 and 23: 3.1.4. FINANCING SMEsProf. Dr. Sela
- Page 24 and 25: • the loan is secured with movabl
- Page 26 and 27: 3.1.4.3. Mutual and loan guarantee
- Page 28 and 29: introduction of e-signatures, only
- Page 30 and 31: The Code of Conduct for Civil Serva
- Page 32 and 33: Trading Across Borders Enforcing Co
- Page 34 and 35: as with all non-governmental organi
- Page 36 and 37: Bulgarian SMEs obtain additional ca
- Page 38 and 39: • Project BG 2004/016-711.11.04 -
- Page 42 and 43: • Romanian citizens are recognize
- Page 44 and 45: The preparatory project of the NDP
- Page 46 and 47: • To support participation in eco
- Page 48 and 49: In 2004, the National Institute of
- Page 50 and 51: Incubators host on average 11 SME,
- Page 52 and 53: Programs. The program is implemente
- Page 54 and 55: development instrument is extremely
- Page 56 and 57: accounting standards, including med
- Page 58 and 59: corporations and open held corporat
- Page 60 and 61: promoting SME sector, cooperation w
- Page 62 and 63: • for unemployed (micro credit)
- Page 64 and 65: are private pension funds, broker h
- Page 66 and 67: very early steps of its democratic
- Page 68 and 69: Another negative factor that is mor
- Page 70 and 71: economy. The so called in the organ
- Page 72 and 73: Federal funds, private capital, esp
- Page 74 and 75: 4.3. MOLDOVATable 14.Dimensions Neg
- Page 76 and 77: Related andsupportingindustriesDome
- Page 78 and 79: Technological:Internetaccessibility
- Page 80 and 81: Domesticdemand• Still not many pe
- Page 82 and 83: international investments• Govern
- Page 84 and 85: 3. Hamel, G., Prahalad, C.K. (1994)
- Page 86 and 87: 5.2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE SME SECTOR I
- Page 88 and 89: General Characteristic of SME Devel
- Page 90 and 91:
Index of SME Development in Armenia
- Page 92 and 93:
The same problem exists in getting
- Page 94 and 95:
SME support infrastructure in Armen
- Page 96 and 97:
5 million was provided by UNDP and
- Page 98 and 99:
5.3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE SME SECTOR I
- Page 100 and 101:
Diagram 1. The number of small ente
- Page 102 and 103:
The privatization process of object
- Page 104 and 105:
13.Cabinet Provision on “Distribu
- Page 106 and 107:
5.3.3. SME support infrastructure i
- Page 108 and 109:
The role of the state in technical
- Page 110 and 111:
General situation of credit marketT
- Page 112 and 113:
After creation and starting impleme
- Page 114 and 115:
At the meantime, small enterprise s
- Page 116 and 117:
Table. 32.Ease of businessDoingBusi
- Page 118 and 119:
people who start small businesses t
- Page 120 and 121:
are salaried and the medium - sized
- Page 122 and 123:
Technology Foresight in Greece 2001
- Page 124 and 125:
Greek VC market started to develop
- Page 126 and 127:
In the area of bankruptcy and restr
- Page 128 and 129:
enterprises. According to TURKSTAT,
- Page 130 and 131:
small size enterprise or micro ente
- Page 132 and 133:
industrial enterprises. Undersecret
- Page 134 and 135:
individuals, rather than well struc
- Page 136 and 137:
7. SUGGESTIONS FOR THE SME DEVELOPM
- Page 138 and 139:
Annex 1.MAP OF THE BLACK SEA COUNTR
- Page 140 and 141:
17-18 June 2005 1 st Moscow Interna
- Page 142 and 143:
ARMENIASTRENGTHS• Application of
- Page 144 and 145:
BULGARIASTRENGHT• Flexibility and
- Page 146 and 147:
GREECESTRENGHT• They have a vital
- Page 148 and 149:
ROMANIASTRENGHTWEAKNESS• Stabilis
- Page 150 and 151:
REPUBLIC OF SERBIASTRENGHT• Longe
- Page 152 and 153:
UKRAINESTRENGTHS• Well educated l
- Page 154 and 155:
In compliance with the Resolution m
- Page 156 and 157:
1. Please provide definition of SME
- Page 158 and 159:
7. Did you establish a dedicated bo
- Page 160:
11. Do you have any suggestions for