at new <strong>social</strong> categories (e.g.: the self-employed); on the other hand, the existing benefits(pensions, unemployment benefits and family benefits) were also subject to a positive evolution.This brought along changes in the financing as well: the government's financial input increased.Gradually, our <strong>social</strong> <strong>security</strong> system evolved from a simple insurance against <strong>social</strong> risks toa guarantee for subsistence <strong>security</strong> for everybody. The 1974 law on the subsistence minimum(now <strong>social</strong> integration income) is to be seen in that context.When the crisis hits in the mid-1970s, the unemployment grows, the number of beneficiariesincreases and it gets difficult to contain the costs of <strong>social</strong> <strong>security</strong>. The only solution was toincrease the revenue side and to cut down on <strong>social</strong> benefits. As from 1982, a crisis policy ispursued. Different categories in the unemployment schemes were introduced then. The cut-downin benefits particularly struck couples living together, single persons and young persons duringtheir 'waiting period' (the period before you can receive unemployment benefits).To enhance the competitiveness of companies, the employers' <strong>social</strong> <strong>security</strong> contributions weredrastically lowered over the last few years and partly replaced by 'alternative financing sources'(from VAT revenues).However, as far as the benefits are concerned, minimum pensions have been raised and thelegislations on the '<strong>social</strong> integration income' (the former 'subsistence minimum') and the'income guarantee for the elderly' (the former 'guaranteed income for the aged') have beenchanged. Moreover, since 2008, self-employed persons are also entitled to reimbursements for"small risks".Finally, in 2009, equal treatment for women and men has been completed as to pension age forsalaried persons and self-employed persons. From now on the normal pension age is establishedat 65 years for both men and women.C. Ideological backgroundSocial <strong>security</strong> in the various countries is based on two systems, following the reflections of twopioneers: Bismarck and Beveridge.Bismarck, Germany's Chancellor at the end of the 19th century, elaborated a <strong>social</strong> <strong>security</strong>system in which the financing is borne by both employees and employers, completed with agovernment contribution for pensions. Benefits are salary-linked, for the aim was to guaranteethat all workers could maintain their living standard if particular risks would appear. The Bismarcksystem is a form of solidarity between the workers.Lord Beveridge, who lived in the first half of the 20th century, stated that not only the workers,but also the total population was entitled to subsistence <strong>security</strong>. Regardless of the type ofemployment, he provides - by means of taxes - the same lump sum benefit for every citizen, incase of unemployment, sickness, pension, etc.The Belgian system combines features of both tendencies. For instance, pensions (except for theminimum and maximum amounts) are established through the <strong>social</strong> contributions you havepaid for them (Bismarck), but (almost) everyone is entitled to reimbursement of hospital costs(Beveridge). The <strong>social</strong> assistance systems are to be seen in the light of the Beveridge conceptas well.8
The various <strong>social</strong> <strong>security</strong> systems existing in our neighbouring countries are often (partly orcompletely) based upon the Bismarck system (Germany) or are inspired by the basic ideas ofBeveridge (United Kingdom).D. OrganisationIn the organisation of the Belgian <strong>social</strong> <strong>security</strong> system, a first distinction should be madebetween the three systems.In the system for salaried persons - the largest of the three - the National Office for SocialSecurity (RSZ - ONSS) is the central institution. The RSZ - ONSS collects both the employers' and theemployees' <strong>social</strong> <strong>security</strong> contributions. Payment of benefits is made by payment institutions,called semi-public institutions ('parastatal'). Every <strong>social</strong> <strong>security</strong> sector has a specific semi-publicinstitution:RKW - ONAFTSRVA - ONEMRVP - ONPRIZIV - INAMIFAO - FATFBZ - FMPRJV - ONVANational office for family allowancesNational employment officeNational pension officeNational institute for sickness and invalidity insuranceFund for accidents at workFund for occupational diseasesNational office for annual vacationSelf-employed persons are insured for five <strong>social</strong> <strong>security</strong> sectors (medical care, incapacity forwork or invalidity, maternity insurance, family benefits, pensions and bankruptcy). Self-employedpersons join and pay <strong>social</strong> contributions to a <strong>social</strong> insurance fund for self-employed people or tothe National Auxiliary Fund for Social Insurance of the Self-Employed, controlled by the Nationalinstitute for the <strong>social</strong> insurances of self-employed persons (RSVZ - INASTI). Social insurance fundsare also charged with paying other benefits to self-employed persons (family benefits, maternityaid, benefits from the insurance for bankruptcy and unconditional pensions).The RSVZ - INASTI has two major tasks:a) collect the <strong>social</strong> contributions;b) coordinate the payment of benefits (except for medical care and invalidity benefits).Civil servants can be divided into two categories: staff of local and provincial authorities andthat of other administrations. The first category of civil servants depends of the National SocialSecurity Office for the Local and Provincial Administrations (RSZPPO - ONSSAPL). For the other civilservants, the authority that employs them shall be responsible for the collection and payment ofcontributions, except for the contributions for medical care, which are allocated to the salariedpersons' scheme.9