Rosicrucian Beacon Magazine - 2012-09 - AMORC
Rosicrucian Beacon Magazine - 2012-09 - AMORC Rosicrucian Beacon Magazine - 2012-09 - AMORC
Does anything really exist outside my own mind?Countless pages have been written on this problem,and it has become evident that the existence of an externalworld, containing solid extended bodies, is not strictlydemonstrable but demands an act of faith. We need faith inthe adequacy of our own psychic processes, in the essentialhonesty of nature of which we are parts, or, as the Frenchphilosopher René Descartes (1596-1650) put it, “faithin the goodness of God, who does not constantly deceive us”.Moreover, philosophy could hardly maintain itsinvestigative nature if there was a lack of faith that realityis somehow rational, purposeful or friendly, so that if weunderstand it and put ourselves in accord with it, it willsupport our highest aspirations. Far from being able todiscard faith, philosophy requires a deeper, more seriousand fundamental faith than religion, which often demandsunquestioning belief in relatively trivial matters.A Way of LifeThe philosopher’s penchant for building vast ‘systems’embracing the whole scope of human knowledge hasbeen disparaged in recent times. Today there are manyphilosophers who restrict their professional activity tothe analysis of the meaning of words and phrases, tological investigations, or to the criticism of science andits methods.In order to avoid errors and place its conclusions ona firm foundation, philosophy needs (and from ancienttimes has found a place for) such preliminary labour; justas biology needs microscopes and astronomy requirestelescopes. But one whose philosophical work stops shortwith details of this sort does not deserve to be called a‘philosopher’ in the traditional meaning of the word. Ifnothing else were essential, then the microscope makerwould deserve to be called a biologist and themanufacturer of telescopes an astronomer. Theseanalyses certainly do not fall under the headingof wisdom, which is what the philosopher hasfrom ancient times aspired to win.Although the philosophic system neednot be as elaborate as the structural concepts erectedby Aristotle in ancient times, or his more moderndescendents, philosophy still attempts to give lifesignificance, coherence and stability by seeing it as a whole,and in relation to a greater whole. At very least it requiresa world view or cosmological doctrine, an interpretationof the nature of man, and an ethic or doctrine of valuesand conduct. These must together form a coherent, selfconsistentbody of thought in order to form a system, orat least the essential framework of one.Because of the continuing incapacity of the stronglyBecause of the continuing incapacity of the strongly established religions toassimilate and adjust their teaching to our modern scientific understandingof the cosmos, life and man, philosophy alone can guide humanity from itspresent deplorable confusion to its ultimate goal.established religions to assimilate and adjust their teachingto our modern scientific understanding of the cosmos, lifeand man, philosophy alone can guide humanity from itspresent deplorable confusion to its ultimate goal. It is ourbest hope. Philosophy at its highest has had aims as loftyas religion at its highest, but its methods are far moreadequate; for it is critical and capable of growth, whereasinstitutional religion clings desperately to outwornnotions of a bygone age.Philosophy, we should never forget, was in the daysof its glory in the ancient world not simply an intellectualexercise but a way of life. The Stoic, the Epicurean, thePythagorean, the Platonist or the Neo-Platonist didPhilosophy alone can guide humanity from itspresent deplorable confusion to its ultimate goal.It is our best hope.not merely learn the principles of his philosophy; helived it. When we consider all that this venerable termimplies, perhaps it is audacious of anyone to claim forthemselves the honourable title of philosopher. But onewho aspires to it must above all endeavour to live like aphilosopher; for the ability to expound philosophicalconcepts and doctrines does not of itself entitle anyoneto this designation. The true philosopher must be readyto accept obligations and endure hardships, to modify hisoccupations and habits, the whole tenor of his life, as hisphilosophy demands.34The Rosicrucian Beacon -- September 2012
In Iran, a garden suddenlyappears before your eyes in the middleof a dry sandy desert. That is why in a villagein Iran, a garden shows off like a jewel. It is unique,it is brilliant, it delights the eye.The distance between a Persian garden andthe outskirts of a village is the distancebetween civilisation and barbarism(Mohammed Ebrahim Bastāni-Parizi.)by Connie James, SRCn THE MARVdASHT plain to the eastof the Zagros Mountains in the Iranianprovince of Fārs, 43 kilometres (27 miles)from Persepolis, lie the scattered remainsof the earliest known recorded garden.It was here, at a site called Pasargadae by the Greeks,from the Persian Pāsārgād, where the real founderof the Persian Empire Cyrus II (the Great) builthis capital and his tomb. Even today, some 2,500years later, you can still see the remains of gleamingwhite columns, set against a background of brown hills.In order to understand the real significance of Persiangardens, both informal and formal, we need to put themin the context of the surrounding countryside of Iran. It’sa land given to extremes in climate, from severe winterswith blizzards, to burning summers with blinding duststorms. The mountains are for the main part barren androcky, and the ever present deserts are covered with dustor a yellow slime where the water doesn’t drain away.Within the desolation are green valleys and hiddenThe Rosicrucian Beacon -- September 201235
- Page 3 and 4: Published quarterly by theEnglish G
- Page 5 and 6: and majesty of a higher state, and
- Page 7 and 8: The sacred is revealed as a human a
- Page 9 and 10: “...the pineal gland... is a very
- Page 11 and 12: I found it very peaceful sitting th
- Page 13 and 14: Míletus held a trading concession
- Page 15 and 16: ‘universal ether’. History tell
- Page 17 and 18: y Ralph M Lewis, FRCan WE EVER be c
- Page 19 and 20: The Right ChoiceA little thought wi
- Page 21 and 22: context, the act of transforming me
- Page 24 and 25: the spirit, and changes them into o
- Page 26 and 27: Figure 8: An 18 th century engravin
- Page 28 and 29: tried to understand and embrace the
- Page 30 and 31: Kiva Kachina Dance by Ray Naha: The
- Page 32 and 33: y Alexander F Skutchhilosophy BEGIN
- Page 34 and 35: The term ‘Socratic Dialogue’ re
- Page 38 and 39: The idealised Hanging Gardens of Ba
- Page 40 and 41: which within itself contained the s
- Page 42 and 43: calming environment. They were oase
- Page 44 and 45: Andreas Vesalius illustrated by Ste
- Page 46 and 47: Roland Northoverm I THIS FLESH, the
Does anything really exist outside my own mind?Countless pages have been written on this problem,and it has become evident that the existence of an externalworld, containing solid extended bodies, is not strictlydemonstrable but demands an act of faith. We need faith inthe adequacy of our own psychic processes, in the essentialhonesty of nature of which we are parts, or, as the Frenchphilosopher René Descartes (1596-1650) put it, “faithin the goodness of God, who does not constantly deceive us”.Moreover, philosophy could hardly maintain itsinvestigative nature if there was a lack of faith that realityis somehow rational, purposeful or friendly, so that if weunderstand it and put ourselves in accord with it, it willsupport our highest aspirations. Far from being able todiscard faith, philosophy requires a deeper, more seriousand fundamental faith than religion, which often demandsunquestioning belief in relatively trivial matters.A Way of LifeThe philosopher’s penchant for building vast ‘systems’embracing the whole scope of human knowledge hasbeen disparaged in recent times. Today there are manyphilosophers who restrict their professional activity tothe analysis of the meaning of words and phrases, tological investigations, or to the criticism of science andits methods.In order to avoid errors and place its conclusions ona firm foundation, philosophy needs (and from ancienttimes has found a place for) such preliminary labour; justas biology needs microscopes and astronomy requirestelescopes. But one whose philosophical work stops shortwith details of this sort does not deserve to be called a‘philosopher’ in the traditional meaning of the word. Ifnothing else were essential, then the microscope makerwould deserve to be called a biologist and themanufacturer of telescopes an astronomer. Theseanalyses certainly do not fall under the headingof wisdom, which is what the philosopher hasfrom ancient times aspired to win.Although the philosophic system neednot be as elaborate as the structural concepts erectedby Aristotle in ancient times, or his more moderndescendents, philosophy still attempts to give lifesignificance, coherence and stability by seeing it as a whole,and in relation to a greater whole. At very least it requiresa world view or cosmological doctrine, an interpretationof the nature of man, and an ethic or doctrine of valuesand conduct. These must together form a coherent, selfconsistentbody of thought in order to form a system, orat least the essential framework of one.Because of the continuing incapacity of the stronglyBecause of the continuing incapacity of the strongly established religions toassimilate and adjust their teaching to our modern scientific understandingof the cosmos, life and man, philosophy alone can guide humanity from itspresent deplorable confusion to its ultimate goal.established religions to assimilate and adjust their teachingto our modern scientific understanding of the cosmos, lifeand man, philosophy alone can guide humanity from itspresent deplorable confusion to its ultimate goal. It is ourbest hope. Philosophy at its highest has had aims as loftyas religion at its highest, but its methods are far moreadequate; for it is critical and capable of growth, whereasinstitutional religion clings desperately to outwornnotions of a bygone age.Philosophy, we should never forget, was in the daysof its glory in the ancient world not simply an intellectualexercise but a way of life. The Stoic, the Epicurean, thePythagorean, the Platonist or the Neo-Platonist didPhilosophy alone can guide humanity from itspresent deplorable confusion to its ultimate goal.It is our best hope.not merely learn the principles of his philosophy; helived it. When we consider all that this venerable termimplies, perhaps it is audacious of anyone to claim forthemselves the honourable title of philosopher. But onewho aspires to it must above all endeavour to live like aphilosopher; for the ability to expound philosophicalconcepts and doctrines does not of itself entitle anyoneto this designation. The true philosopher must be readyto accept obligations and endure hardships, to modify hisoccupations and habits, the whole tenor of his life, as hisphilosophy demands.34The <strong>Rosicrucian</strong> <strong>Beacon</strong> -- September <strong>2012</strong>