GIS Sana Sini - Malaysia Geoportal
GIS Sana Sini - Malaysia Geoportal GIS Sana Sini - Malaysia Geoportal
CadastralRegistration10BULETIN GEOSPATIAL Sektor Awam Edisi 2/2010INTEGRATION OF COMPUTERISEDLAND REGISTRATION SYSTEM(CLRS) AND CADASTRAL DATAMANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CDMS)There could be extensive benefits if these twosystems, which are CLRS of PTG and CDMSof DSMM, are linked together. For that reason,a pilot project being started in Kuala Lumpurin 1st April 1995 to electronically connect andintegrate the CLRS with the CDMS for the wholeKuala Lumpur then to develop the operationalsystems that can subsequently be implementedthroughout the country in Peninsular Malaysia.Therefore, with the integration of attribute datafrom CLRS and spatial data from CDMS andthrough identified application, efficiency of landadministration can be greatly improved. Nordin(2001) stated that the envisaged applicationsinclude on-line registration for survey andpreparation of title, extending DCDB enquirymodule to the land administrators and on theother hand, linking the Qualified Title (QT)information to the DCDB. Although conceptuallytenable, the eventual implementation wouldneed substantial negotiation and compromisingin between PTG and DSMM.With the vast changing in the ICT, such asGIS, internet and web based application andtogether with the initiative of MalaysianGeospatial Data Infrastructure (MyGDI) (NationalSpatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI)), e-Tanah ofMinistry of Natural Resources and Environment(NRE) and e-Cadastre, Electronic Strata Moduleof DSMM, CLRS and CDMS database couldbe integrated electronically. In order to achievethe goal of comprehensive Land InformationSystem from district level up to state andeventually at the national level, the integrationof spatial CDMS database with the textual CLRSdatabase play a preliminary requirement of allthese. Moreover, Mariappan (2005) introduceda mechanism to integrate these two stand-alonedatabases. Coordination among DSMM, PTGand PTD can be provided by the installation ofcentralised server or distributed server at eachof their office which act as the transporters andbridges in exchanging data between CLRSand CDMS. Figure 4 illustrates the conceptualintegration of cadastral survey and titleregistration databases. Although there are alot of benefits from an integrated textual titleregistration database and the graphic as wellas spatial cadastral database, but there are stillmany hurdles to solve at this stage.DistrictLevelPTDPTDPTDJUDJUDJUDStateLevelPTGSDSMNationalLevelJKPTGDSMMMaintenanceLandAdministration& ApprovalLand RelatedAgencyCP Submission& Status ReportUserInternet &E-CommerceLicense LandSurveyorDocumentSearchCPSubmissionCLRSCDMSStateCLRSDatabaseUPIStateCLRSDCDBIntegrationLevelUpdatingIntegrated State DatabaseCLRS + DCDBUpdatingFigure 4 : Conceptual model to integrate CLRS and DCDB(Partly adapted from Mariappan, 2005)
CONCLUSIONSMost traditional cadastral systems are basedon two-dimensional (2D) registers that dealonly with properties on the land surface. Thesesystems are unsuitable for today’s multi-levelreality. To cater to both above and below surfaceconstructions and to enable the registrationof real properties that are not limited to theland surface, it is necessary to amend thelegislation. A three-dimensional (3D) approachfor Cadastral System and Land RegistrationSystem can provide a better means to manageour modern world. The existing Cadastral Systemsdo have a number of inherent advantageslike responsibility for proprietary rights, up todate information coverage and good mapping(Benhamu and Doystsher, 2003). Theseadvantages notwithstanding, they suffer froma number of weaknesses arising from their2D limitations that result in their dealing onlywith properties on the land surface.This paper is part of the research on developinga 3D property registration system in Malaysia.As mentioned earlier, besides this technicalaspect, legal and organisational aspects alsoplay an essential role and cannot be ignoredor separated from the cadastre main body,therefore, all of these aspects should worktogether and concurrently. In short, this papercan be an initial start for research on thelegal and organisational aspects for developingMalaysian 3D Property Registration System.REFERENCESAhmad-Nasruddin, M. H. and Abdul-Rahman(2006). Developing 3D Registration for 3DCadastre. In Abdul-Rahman, A., Zlatanova, S. andCoors, V. (Eds.) Innovations in 3D Geo InformationSystems (pp. 535-546). Berlin, Heidelberg, NewYork: Springer-Verlag.Benhamu, M. and Doytsher, Y., 2003. Towarda Spatial 3D Cadastre in Israel. Computers,Environment and Urban Systems. 27(2003),359-374.Chong, S. C. (2006). Towards a 3D Cadastrein Malaysia-An Implementation Evaluation.M.Sc. Thesis. Delft University of Technology,Delft, the Netherlands.Doytsher, Y., Forrai, J. and Kirschner, G. (2001).Initiatives Toward a 3D Gis-Related Multi-layerDigital Cadastre in Israel. Survey of Israel, Israel.Ji, Mingru. (2007). Registration of 3D Cadastralobjects in China. M.Sc. Thesis. Internationalinstitute for Geoinformation Science and EarthObservation, Enschede, the Netherlands.Mariappan, G. (2005). Isu-isu PengintegrasianPangkalan Data Ukur Kadaster dan SistemPendaftaran Tanah Berkomputer. M.Sc. Thesis.Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor,Malaysia.Mitrofanova, E. (2002). Property Rights and3D Determination. In Suchasni dosyagnennyageodezychnoyi nauky ta vyrobnyctva (Modernachievements of geodetic science andproduction). Zbirnyk naukovyh prac’ (Collectionof scientific works). Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine.Nordin, A. F. (2001). Institutional Issues in TheImplementation of a Coordinated CadastralSystem for Peninsular Malaysia : A Study on TheLegal and Organisational Aspect. M.Sc. Thesis.Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor,Malaysia.Paulsson, J. (2007). 3D Property Rights-AnAnalysia of Key Factor Based on InternationalExperience. Ph.D. Thesis. Royal Institute ofTechnology, Stockholm, Sweden.Sandberg, H. (2003). Three-dimensional Partitionand Registration of Subsurface Space. Israel LawReview, Vol. 37, 120-167.Stoter, J. E. (2004). 3D Cadastre. Ph.D. Thesis. DelftUniversity of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.Stoter, J. E. and Ploeger, H. D. (2002). MultipleUse of Space: Current Practice of Registration andDevelopment of a 3D Cadastre. In E. M. Fendel,K. Jones, R. Laurini et al. (Eds.); Proceedings ofUDMS 2002, 23rd Urban Data ManagementSymposium (pp. I.1-I.16). Prague, CzechRepublic: UDMS.Tan, L.C., Hussin, K. and Ernest Khoo, H.O. (2009).Malaysian 3D Property Legislation: A PreliminaryApproach. In: Proceedings of ISPRS InternationalWorkshop on Multidimensional & Mobile DataModel (ISPRS WG II-5). 21-22 October 2009.Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor,Malaysia.UN-ECE (1996). Land Administration Guidelines.Meeting of Officials on Land Administration,United Nations Economic Commission ofEurope. ECE/HBP/96.Valstad, T. (2006). Development of 3D Cadastrein Norway. TS 14-3D and 4D Cadastres, In:Shaping the Changes, XXIII FIG Congress.8-13 October 2006. Munich, Germany.Van-Oosterom, P. J. M., Lemmen, C., Ingvarsson,T., Molen, P. V. D., Ploeger, H., Quak, W., Stoter,J. And Zevenbergen, J. (2006). The Core cadastralDomain Model. Computers, Environment andUrban Systems. 30(2006), 627-660.CadastralRegistration11BULETIN GEOSPATIAL Sektor Awam Edisi 2/2010
- Page 2 and 3: dari meja Ketua EditorAssalamualaik
- Page 4: MappingSpecies2BULETIN GEOSPATIAL S
- Page 8 and 9: CadastralRegistration6BULETIN GEOSP
- Page 10 and 11: CadastralRegistration8BULETIN GEOSP
- Page 14 and 15: Kearah BandarSelamat12BULETIN GEOSP
- Page 16 and 17: Kearah BandarSelamat14JENIS-JENIS D
- Page 18 and 19: Kearah BandarSelamat16BULETIN GEOSP
- Page 20 and 21: Kearah BandarSelamat18BULETIN GEOSP
- Page 22 and 23: Kearah BandarSelamat20BULETIN GEOSP
- Page 24 and 25: Kearah BandarSelamat22BULETIN GEOSP
- Page 26 and 27: EstablishingQuantum GIS24BULETIN GE
- Page 28 and 29: EstablishingQuantum GIS26BULETIN GE
- Page 30 and 31: EstablishingQuantum GIS28BULETIN GE
- Page 32 and 33: GIS Sana Sini30BULETIN GEOSPATIAL S
- Page 34 and 35: GIS Sana Sini32negeri kedah dan sel
- Page 36 and 37: GIS Sana Sini34Bengkel TEKNOLOGI DA
- Page 38 and 39: GIS Sana SiniKAMPUS NRE36BULETIN GE
CONCLUSIONSMost traditional cadastral systems are basedon two-dimensional (2D) registers that dealonly with properties on the land surface. Thesesystems are unsuitable for today’s multi-levelreality. To cater to both above and below surfaceconstructions and to enable the registrationof real properties that are not limited to theland surface, it is necessary to amend thelegislation. A three-dimensional (3D) approachfor Cadastral System and Land RegistrationSystem can provide a better means to manageour modern world. The existing Cadastral Systemsdo have a number of inherent advantageslike responsibility for proprietary rights, up todate information coverage and good mapping(Benhamu and Doystsher, 2003). Theseadvantages notwithstanding, they suffer froma number of weaknesses arising from their2D limitations that result in their dealing onlywith properties on the land surface.This paper is part of the research on developinga 3D property registration system in <strong>Malaysia</strong>.As mentioned earlier, besides this technicalaspect, legal and organisational aspects alsoplay an essential role and cannot be ignoredor separated from the cadastre main body,therefore, all of these aspects should worktogether and concurrently. In short, this papercan be an initial start for research on thelegal and organisational aspects for developing<strong>Malaysia</strong>n 3D Property Registration System.REFERENCESAhmad-Nasruddin, M. H. and Abdul-Rahman(2006). Developing 3D Registration for 3DCadastre. In Abdul-Rahman, A., Zlatanova, S. andCoors, V. (Eds.) Innovations in 3D Geo InformationSystems (pp. 535-546). Berlin, Heidelberg, NewYork: Springer-Verlag.Benhamu, M. and Doytsher, Y., 2003. Towarda Spatial 3D Cadastre in Israel. Computers,Environment and Urban Systems. 27(2003),359-374.Chong, S. C. (2006). Towards a 3D Cadastrein <strong>Malaysia</strong>-An Implementation Evaluation.M.Sc. Thesis. Delft University of Technology,Delft, the Netherlands.Doytsher, Y., Forrai, J. and Kirschner, G. (2001).Initiatives Toward a 3D Gis-Related Multi-layerDigital Cadastre in Israel. Survey of Israel, Israel.Ji, Mingru. (2007). Registration of 3D Cadastralobjects in China. M.Sc. Thesis. Internationalinstitute for Geoinformation Science and EarthObservation, Enschede, the Netherlands.Mariappan, G. (2005). Isu-isu PengintegrasianPangkalan Data Ukur Kadaster dan SistemPendaftaran Tanah Berkomputer. M.Sc. Thesis.Universiti Teknologi <strong>Malaysia</strong>, Skudai, Johor,<strong>Malaysia</strong>.Mitrofanova, E. (2002). Property Rights and3D Determination. In Suchasni dosyagnennyageodezychnoyi nauky ta vyrobnyctva (Modernachievements of geodetic science andproduction). Zbirnyk naukovyh prac’ (Collectionof scientific works). Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine.Nordin, A. F. (2001). Institutional Issues in TheImplementation of a Coordinated CadastralSystem for Peninsular <strong>Malaysia</strong> : A Study on TheLegal and Organisational Aspect. M.Sc. Thesis.Universiti Teknologi <strong>Malaysia</strong>, Skudai, Johor,<strong>Malaysia</strong>.Paulsson, J. (2007). 3D Property Rights-AnAnalysia of Key Factor Based on InternationalExperience. Ph.D. Thesis. Royal Institute ofTechnology, Stockholm, Sweden.Sandberg, H. (2003). Three-dimensional Partitionand Registration of Subsurface Space. Israel LawReview, Vol. 37, 120-167.Stoter, J. E. (2004). 3D Cadastre. Ph.D. Thesis. DelftUniversity of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.Stoter, J. E. and Ploeger, H. D. (2002). MultipleUse of Space: Current Practice of Registration andDevelopment of a 3D Cadastre. In E. M. Fendel,K. Jones, R. Laurini et al. (Eds.); Proceedings ofUDMS 2002, 23rd Urban Data ManagementSymposium (pp. I.1-I.16). Prague, CzechRepublic: UDMS.Tan, L.C., Hussin, K. and Ernest Khoo, H.O. (2009).<strong>Malaysia</strong>n 3D Property Legislation: A PreliminaryApproach. In: Proceedings of ISPRS InternationalWorkshop on Multidimensional & Mobile DataModel (ISPRS WG II-5). 21-22 October 2009.Universiti Teknologi <strong>Malaysia</strong>, Skudai, Johor,<strong>Malaysia</strong>.UN-ECE (1996). Land Administration Guidelines.Meeting of Officials on Land Administration,United Nations Economic Commission ofEurope. ECE/HBP/96.Valstad, T. (2006). Development of 3D Cadastrein Norway. TS 14-3D and 4D Cadastres, In:Shaping the Changes, XXIII FIG Congress.8-13 October 2006. Munich, Germany.Van-Oosterom, P. J. M., Lemmen, C., Ingvarsson,T., Molen, P. V. D., Ploeger, H., Quak, W., Stoter,J. And Zevenbergen, J. (2006). The Core cadastralDomain Model. Computers, Environment andUrban Systems. 30(2006), 627-660.CadastralRegistration11BULETIN GEOSPATIAL Sektor Awam Edisi 2/2010